The founder of this philosophical system was Kapila.1 Some assert that the followers of this school do not believe in God. The fact is, however, that they do not affirm the existence of a creator, and creation is ascribed to Nature (Prakṛiti), and the world is said to be eternal. All that is veiled by non-existence is not believed to be non-existent1 but the caused is absorbed in the cause, as a tortoise retracts its feet within its shell. They accept the doctrine of freedom of will in actions, and of hell, of heaven, and the recompenses of deeds. With regard to emancipation, they agree with the Mímáṃsá. Proof (pramáṇa), is of three kinds.2 They do not believe in the soul (átman).3 Analogy and comparison are not accounted sources of knowledge, nor are time and space, substances, but caused by the motion of the sun. The word tattva (first principle) is used in their treatises for padártha, of which there are twenty-five, and these are comprised under four heads. 1. Prakṛiti (Nature), which is evolvent and not evolute. (2). Prakṛiti-vikṛiti (developments of Nature), evolvent and evolute; these are of seven kinds, viz., mahat (the great one, Buddhi or Intellect), ahankára (consciousness or egotism), and the five tanmátra (subtile elements). 3. Vikṛiti (modifications), are evolutes only, and are not more than sixteen, namely the eleven indriya—(five senses, five organs of action and manas) and the five gross elements (ether, air, light or fire, earth and water). (4). The fourth is neither Nature, nor modification, nor evolvent nor evolute, and is called Purusha,1 that is Átman, the soul.
The first of the principles above-mentioned is primordial matter,
From this exposition it is clear that the seven substances mentioned (intellect, consciousness, and the five subtile elements) are on the one hand evolvents, and on the other evolutes, and the sixteen, that is, the eleven organs and the five gross elements, are evolutes. The soul (átman) is considered neither evolvent nor evolute. The five senses are held to be organs of perception, and manas discriminates between advantage and detriment. Consciousness cognizes itself by act or the omission of act, and intellect determines one or the other. From the five gross elements, other productions are evolved, but as tattvas, are incapable of further creations, causality is not attributed to them
The elemental order of creation is sixfold:—(1). svarga-loka, the world above, in the constitution of which goodness prevails: (2). mṛityuloka, (world of death), the abode of men, in which foulness or passion predominates: pátála-loka, the world beneath, in which darkness is prevalent: devatá: (superior order of being) in which the element of goodness is predominant. Through their extraordinary power they can appear in divers shapes, and assume astonishing appearances, and from the transparency of their essence their true forms are invisible to the sight. There are eight orders of these:—(1). Bráhmya, blessed spirits, that inhabit the abode of Brahmá. (2). Prájápatya1: Prajápati is the name of a great divinity to whom is assigned a sphere, and those that dwell therein are thus styled. (3). Aindra: Indra, is the regent of the heavens, to whom a sphere is likewise referrible, and its dwellers are thus denominated. (4). Paitra2: the belief of the Hindu sage is that each individual's progenitors that have died after a life of good works, will receive celestial shapes and enjoy their recompense in a special abode. The devatás therein, are called by this name. (5). Gándharva: this is said to be a sphere where the heavenly choristers reside. (6). Yáksha: in this sphere the Yakshas dwell; they are great ministering spirits, the guardian of the north. (7). Rákshasa, is a sphere inhabited by the Rákshasas, who are the malignant fiends of these orders and who slay men. (8). Piśácha: by this name an order of beings is defined who are characterized by an evil nature and perverted intelligence. They are less powerful than the Rákshasas, and are assigned a special sphere, and extraordinary legends are related of each of these orders.3
The Animal creation (tiryagyonya)1 is one in which the mode rajas (passion or foulness), prevailed at its production and is of five kinds:— (1). paśu, domestic animals: (2). mṛiga, wild animals: (3). pakshí, birds: (4). sariśṛipa, creeping things applied to the different reptiles and fishes: (5). sthávara,2 the vegetable kingdom. Mánushya,3 man, was produced through excess of the quality of passion. The general opinion adopts this division and belief. At the dissolution of the world, these creations perish with the five elements, and the elements are absorbed in the five tanmátras (rudimentary elements) which again are veiled in egotism (ahankára), and this in turn is absorbed in the secret recesses of mahat, intellect, which is (finally) lost in the pure depths of Prakṛiti (Nature).
Pain is of three kinds:—(1). ádhyátmika, intrinsic pain, both bodily and mental: (2). ádhidaivika, supernatural pain or calamity from a divine source, and (3). ádhibhautika, extrinsic pain arising from the natural source of the elements. Bandha, bondage, is the source of all that fetters the spirit and debars it from emancipation.
Prákṛitika signifies one who holds Nature (Prakṛiti), in place of God. Vaikṛitika4 is one who from ignorance assumes the eleven organs (of action and sense), (indriya) to be the Supreme Being. Dakshina (religious offerings or oblations in general) implies the being attached to the performance of works and believing them to be the ultimate aim of spirituality.
They affirm that he whose mind is concentrated upon one object (of contemplation) and the fruition1 of the celestial abode, if the subject of his absorption be the first-mentioned and his thoughts be thus continuously applied in efficacious devotion, he attains to the enjoyment of bliss in the sphere above for a hundred thousand manvantaras,2 after which he returns to this world; in the organs of sense and action (indriya), during ten manvantaras, in the elements during one hundred, in consciousness (ahankára), during one thousand, and in intellect (mahat), during ten thousand, he enjoys the fruition of heavenly delights; after which term he reverts to this earth.3 A manvantara is one and seventy enumerations of the four ages.4 For each good action a period of heavenly bliss is allotted: for instance, he who gives to a Brahman sufficient ground for the erection of a house, will be recompensed by ten kalpas in heaven, a kalpa being equivalent to four yugas. He who bestows a thousand cows in charity, passes one kroṛ and 14,000 kalpas in paradise, and after numerous alternations of earth and heaven, the severance between nature (Prakṛiti) and the soul (Purusha) is evolved before the vision, and right apprehension arises. This is the goal of emancipation and the renewal of embodiments ceases for ever.
This school also like that of the Vedánta, recognises two kinds of body, the liṇga saríra, or subtile frame, consisting of eighteen members, viz., the eleven organs of action and sense with manas, the five subtile elements, with intellect and consciousness. The other is the sthúla saríra or gross body, and death signifies the divulsion of the one from the other, the subtile frame continuing till final liberation.
The subjects of this system are treated in sixty tantras which like the term adhyáya1 is used for division or chapter.
The first treats of the existence of Nature and the soul: the second describes Nature as one: the third, shows the distinction between the soul and Nature: the fourth, that there is no effect without a cause: the fifth that Nature exists as the root-evolvent of all other forms: the sixth, that all evolved action must be associated with one of three qualities; the seventh, that the separation of the soul from Nature is attained through perfect knowledge: the eighth, the association of these two with Ignorance: the ninth, that in the light of perfect knowledge when Nature ceases from alternations of embodiment, if for a time the elemental form should continue to endure, it is solely through the residuum2 of ignorance otherwise it would also perish: the tenth, that causality lies in Nature and not in the soul, and it treats of the five states of the five afflictions (kleśa), viz., ignorance, egotism, desire, aversion and ardent attachment to life,3 as briefly alluded to in the Pátañjala school. Twenty-eight topics treat of the defect of the twenty-eight faculties of the eleven indriya, and the seventeen injuries of Intellect.4 Nine topics treat of the nine distinctions of acquiescence (tushṭi):—(1). Prakṛiti-tushṭi, (relating to matter), concentration of thought on Nature and contemplation thereof, in the belief that Nature will increase knowledge and sever the soul from itself: (2). Upádána-tushṭi (relating to means), the knowledge that Nature of itself will solve no difficulty, and that until the heart is detached from all objects, the end is not attainable: (3). Kálatushṭi, (relating to time), the notion that all desires are fulfilled by the passing a way of time, upon which therefore, the mind should be fixed while the heart is detached: (4). Bhágya-tushṭi (relating to fortune); in the knowledge that to the many the world passes away and effects nothing, to understand that the solution of difficulties rests with fortune and to turn thereunto freeing the mind from all other attachment: (5). Pára-tushṭi, withdrawal from all wordly unsubstantial pleasures in the assurance that thousands have sought them with pain and profited nothing thereby, and hence to abandon their pursuit: (6). Supára-tushṭi, to detach the heart from personal possessions, in the view that they have no stability, since tyrants may take them by force, and thieves may by cunning, steal. (7). Párápára-tushṭi, abstinence from pleasures of sense with the knowledge that even if followed by personal gratification, they must cease, and to such as these, attachment is vain:1 (8). Anuttamámbhas-tushṭi detachment from all enjoyments, from consciousness of pain in their loss: (9). Uttamámbhastushṭi, detachment from pleasure with the motive of avoiding injury to others.2
Eight tantras or topics treat of the eight perfections (siddhi): (1). úha-siddhi (reasoning), without the necessity of reading to understand a subject by the light of reason: (2). śabda siddhi (oral instruction), without need of teaching, to understand by the mere hearing of the words: (3). adhyayana-siddhi (study), becoming wise by the perception of truths: (4). suhṛidprápti-siddhi, attaining knowledge by intercourse of friends: (5). dána-siddhi, (gift), serving one who accepts an invitation to a repast, or the bestowal of a gift on him, and manifesting a desire of knowledge and success in obtaining it.
The founder of this system was the sage Patañjali.1
With regard to the predicaments and the nature of proof and other
points, he follows the Sánkhya, but he acknowledges a Supreme Being
whom he holds to be absolute existence and intelligence. The creation1
of
the five subtile elements (tanmátra), he believes to proceed directly from
intellect (mahat) without the intermediate agency of ahaṇkára (consciousness.)
From vaikṛita ahaṇkára (modified consciousness), when the
mode of goodness prevails, the five external senses are produced, and from
taijasa ahaṇkára,2
(ardent consciousness), when the mode of passion is predominant,
the five organs of action (karmendriya) arise, and from the
combined influence of goodness and passion springs manas or mind.
They believe that the subtile frame (súkshma saríra) is subject to extinction,
but receives new birth when another body is produced until final
liberation is accomplished. But this is not attained without Yoga which
is the cardinal doctrine of this attractive system. The thinking principle,
Chitta,3
is the substrate of manas. Vṛitti (function), is the action of manas
in the acquisition of good and evil qualities. Nirodha (suppression) is
the restraint of those functions in action and the attainment of quiescence.1
Yoga or meditation is then secured when the foot of desire is obstructed
from advance. Certain means to this end are laid down, and I here make
a brief abstract in the hope that it may prove of value to the heart-stricken
in the path of search. It is said that through the union with Mahat
(Intellect) of manas and the three qualities, five conditions or states of
the thinking principle arise which are called the five stages (bhúmi).
These are, (1). kshipta, (restless activity),2
the heart from the predominance
of passion being never at rest: (2). múḍha (bewildered), from excess
of darkness, being quiescent without attaining the object sought.3
(3).
vikshipta (voluptuousness), from excess of the quality of goodness, the
goal is reached and a certain repose is secured, but through excess of
passion (rajas), this is not lasting, and the mind becomes dissipated;
(4). Ekágra (concentration), through excess of goodness, power is obtained
to keep the mind from wandering from the subject of meditation:
(5). Niruddha (the suppressive state) is a condition in which by dissolution
of the three qualities, the mental residua (
Under the first three conditions, Yoga or meditation, is rarely obtained. They assert that under the first condition manas is the recipient of unrighteousness: under the second, of ignorance; under the third, of sensuousness (avirága) and impotence (anaiśvarya); under the fourth, of virtue, (dharma), absence of passion (virága), and supernatural power (aiśvarya); and under the fifth, the residua of good and evil are suppressed and functions (vṛitti), are dissolved. These latter are of two kinds, klishṭi (painful), tendency to evil works, and aklishṭi, tendency to good works and each according to its good or evil tendency is five-fold. (1). Pramáṇa-vṛitti (right notion); perception of things by proof is attained through prevalence of sattva (goodness); (2). viparyaya, (mis-conception) arises from prevalence of goodness and darkness. If this abides in the person forming a definite conclusion it is called viparíti, (perverted) but if he be in uncertainty whether a thing be itself or some thing else, it is called sanśaya, doubt; (3). vikalpa (fancy)1, ambiguity regarding a thing, arising from goodness and darkness: (4). nidrá (sleep), the state of sleep arising from excess of darkness in which consciousness is lost.2 The opinion of other Hindu philosophers is that the mind is withdrawn from its peculiar association with the senses: (5). smṛiti (memory), is the recovery through the influence of goodness of what has passed from the mind. In the fourth state, the second, third and fourth functions cease and in the fifth, the first and fifth are dissolved and final liberation is attained.
Although this sublime contingency does not occur save by prosperous fortune and the divine favour, yet the sagacity of the experienced base its acquisition on twelve principles.
I. Meditation on the divinity (Iśvara-upásaná), that is, to illuminate the interior spirit by constant thought of God and to be conscious of its freedom from four things, afflictions, works, deserts, desires. Kleśa (affliction) signifies the sum of grief and pain, and this is five-fold, (1). avidyá, ignorance of the reality of things: (2). asmitá (egotism,) conceiving oneself to possess that which one has not: (3) rága, desire for one's own gratification: (4). dvesha, aversion, or anger; (5) abhiniveśa (ardent attachment to life), fear of death.1 Karma (works), signifies merit and demerit (from works). Vipáka, (deserts), the recompense of actions. A´śaya, thought regarding merits and demerits which after effacement may recur.
Those who have reached the goal in this path, assert that assiduous meditation on God after this manner, annihilates all evil propensities and exterminates nine depredators of the road. These are (1). vyádhi sickness: (2). styána (langour), indisposition (of the thinking principle) to efficacious work: (3). sanśaya; doubt regarding the (practicable) means of meditation and its results: (4). pramáda (carelessness), forgetfulness of the duties of meditation: (5). álasya slothfulness in the performance of these duties: (6). avirati, (worldly mindedness), propensity (of the thinking principle) to enjoy the pleasures of the world: (7). bhránti-darśana, error in perception, (such as mistaking mother of pearl for silver): (8). alabdha-bhúmikatva, (non-attainment of any stage), the non-attainment of the fourth out of the five states: (9). anavasthitatva (instability), not abiding in the fourth stage and receding from it.
II. ´Sraddhá,2 (inclination), zeal in following the Yoga and making it the sum of desire.
III. Vírya (energy), seeking the fulfilment of the object sought with much eagerness.
IV. Smṛiti (memory), retaining in view the transcendent advantages and great results of this devotion, and never relaxing attention.
V. Maitrí (friendliness), desiring the welfare of humanity.
VI. Karuṇá, (compassion), being distressed at the sorrows and affliction of mankind, and resolving to relieve them.
VII. Muditá, (gladness), being pleased in the happiness of others.
VIII. Upekshá, (indifference), avoiding the wrong-doer lest evil principles be acquired, and yet not entertaining malevolence nor rebuking him.3
IX. Samádhi, (meditation), unity of intention and contemplation of one object.
X. Prajṅná (discernment), allowing only understanding, rectitude, and the search after truth to enter the mind.
XI. Vairágya, (dispassion), is of various kinds, its ultimate stage being detachment from all, and contentment with only the Supreme Being.
XII. Abhyása (exercise), being unintermittingly assiduous in the control of knowledge and action till this (steadfastness) becomes habitual.1
In the works on this system, Iśvara-upásaná, vairágya and abhyása are treated together: five separate expositions are allotted to vírya, śraddhá, smṛiti, samádhi and prajṅna, and the four following maitri, karuṇá, muditá and upekshá are likewise separately discussed. They have all been concurrently reviewed in this work.
In this field of philosophy, Yoga is regarded as two-fold, (1) samprajṅnáta-samádhi (conscious meditation), directing the easily distracted mind to one object and gradual concentration on the ideal conception of the Divine Being; and (2) asamprajṅnáta (unconscious meditation), in which this ideal conception of the divinity ceases, and absorption in unitive communion with its essence is obtained. The first is of three kinds, (I) Gráhya-samápatti (Tangible Forms), meditation on one of the five gross elements. With regard to the gross and subtile elements it is two-fold. The latter is termed vitarkánugati, (attendant argumentation) and the former vicháránugati, (attendant deliberation). Vitarkánugati is of two kinds; savitarka (argumentative meditation), when the cogitation is regarding the relation of words to their meanings, and nirvitarka (non-argumentative), when it is independent of this relation. Vicháránugati is cogitation on one of the eight principles, viz., nature, intellect, consciousness, and the five subtile elements. If the element be considered in its relation to time and space, it is called savichára (deliberative), and if otherwise nirvichára2 (non-deliberative).
II. Grahaṇa-samápatti (Acceptance Form), is cogitation on one of the organs of sense which with reference to time, space, and cause is termed savitarka, and if in regard to the inherent meaning only, vitarka, and both kinds are called Sánanda (joyous).1
III. Gṛihitri-samápatti (Form of the taker). In this stage the votary withdraws himself from all other pre-occupation, and is merged in the single contemplation of the Supreme Soul. This also in relation to time and space receives the two names above-mentioned, and both kinds are termed Asmitá (Egotism).
Asamprajṅnáta is two-fold:—(1). Bhavapratyaya (caused by the world), not distinguishing Nature from the soul, nor holding it to be separate from the elements or the organs of action and sense. If Nature is cognized as soul, this meditative state is called Prakṛitilaya (resolved into nature), and if the elements and organs be so cognized, it is termed videha, (unembodied). (2). Upáya-pratyaya (means of ascertainment); by good fortune and a happy destiny, under the guidance of the twelve principles above-mentioned, the cognition of the soul is attained and the fruition of bliss secured at the desired goal where final emancipation presents itself to view.
The devotees of the Yoga practice are of four classes. The first, called Práthama kalpika, (entering upon the course) is he who with firm resolve and steadfast foot enters upon this waste of mortification. The second, Madhubhúmika (in the honey-stage), is he who by mortification of the senses and right conduct, effaces rust from the mirror of the heart to such degree that he can divine the reflections in another's mind and see whatever from its minuteness is imperceptible to others. The third, Prajṅnájyotis (illuminated), by happy fortune and zealous endeavour subdues the organs of sense and the elements, and the far and the near, with reference to sight and hearing, &c., become relatively the same to him, and he acquires power to create and destroy. The fourth, Atikránta bhávaníya (attaining the highest dispassion), is one to whom the past becomes present.
It is said that conscious meditation consists of eight particulars and these are, as it were, intrinsic parts thereof, in contradistinction to the twelve principles which are accounted extrinsic means. They are called Ashṭánga-Yoga (meditation on eight particular parts of the body). These are:—(1). Yama, (2). Niyama, (3). A´sana, (4). Práṇáyáma, (5). Pratyáhára, (6). Dháraṇa, (7). Dhyána, (8). Samádhi.
Yama, restraint, is five-fold:—(1). Ahinśá (non-slaughter),1 avoiding destruction of life and injury (to others). When this habit is formed, in a devotee, enemies are conciliated: (2). Satya (veracity) is the habitual practice of speaking the truth, and thus securing acceptance of his desires2: (3). Asteya, (non-theft), the non-appropriation of goods beyond what is customarily permitted: the keys of the world's treasures are entrusted to the observer of this principle: (4). Brahmacharya (continence), to abstain from women, by which means the ignorant will be able to light the lamp of knowledge from the inspired efficacy of his will. (5). Aparigraha (non-avarice), retaining nothing of worldly goods which, being regarded as the capital source of pain, should be abandoned and by this the future will be revealed.
Niyama (obligation), is also five-fold:—(1). ´Saucha (purification), internal and external3 purity, avoiding association with men, and acquiring self-control; (by this means) the mind is rendered essentially stainless, commendable desires bear fruit, and the fourth state is reached: (2). Santosha (contentedness), desisting from improper desires and being satisfied with the fulfilment of this excellent devotion. Happiness is thus obtained and worldly pleasures have no relish: (3). Tapas, (penance), mortification of the spirit and body and enduring heat, cold, hunger, thirst, and silence, until all five afflictions are effaced from the tablet of the mind. Through this practice the votary gains the faculty of seeing things distant, concealed or minute, and can assume any form at will. (4). Svádhyáya4 (sacred study), repetition of the names of the deity, and recounting his attributes and all that is conducive to liberation. If there is inability to read, then by the constant repetition of the word Oṃkára5, the deities and other celestial spirits associate with him and vouchsafe him their assistance. (5). I´śvara-praṇidhána (devotion to God), is absolute resignation to the will of God; by this means various faculties of knowledge are acquired and illumination regarding all the degrees of perfection is attained.
A´sana (posture), signifies sitting. The austere recluses of this temple of retirement, give the number of these as eighty-four, of which thirteen are esteemed the most efficacious, and each has a special mode and a separate name. Under their influence, cold, heat, hunger and thirst are little felt. Some learned Hindu authorities reckon the same uumber of sitting attitudes for those who are still attached to worldly concerns but of a different kind. The writer of these pages who has witnessed many of these postures, has gazed in astonishment, wondering how any human being could subject his muscles, tendons and bones in this manner to his will.1
Práṇáyáma, regulation of the breath at will, is three-fold.—(1). Púraka (inspiration), drawing in the breath by the nose in the following manner: with the thumb of the right hand let the left nostril be closed and the breath slowly inspired by the right nostril. (2). Kumbhaka2 (suspension), to retain the breath within and to make as long an inspiration as possible closing both nostrils with the thumb and little finger of the right hand. The ascetics of this country can so hold their breath that they will breathe but once in twelve years. (3). Rechaka (expiration), letting out the drawn breath, very gradually, with the thumb pressed below the right nostril and removing the little finger from the left nostril, suffering it to escape. In short, to inspire with the right and expire with the left nostril. These three functions constitute the Práṇáyáma. It is said that the breath extends as far as sixteen fingers from the nose, and some say twelve. By this operation the mind is quiescent, and perfect knowledge is obtained; but this is secured only through the assistance of an experienced master of this knowledge.
At this time the devotee should abstain from meat, hot spices and acid and saline food, and be content with a little milk and rice. He must also avoid the society of women lest his brain be distracted and melancholy ensue.
Pratyáhára (abstraction), is the withdrawal of the five senses from their respective objects of perception. When the mind is quiescent, these perforce cannot escape. Thus objects may present themselves before him without exciting desire.
Dhárana (steadiness), is the confinement of the thinking principle to one place, such as the navel, the crown of the head, between the eyebrows, the point of the nose, or the tip of the tongue.
Dhyána (contemplation), is uninterrupted reflection on what is before the mind, and the absence of every thing but the object, the thought, and the thinking principle of the individual contemplating.
Samádhi (meditation); in this the thinker and the consciousness of thought are both effaced. At this stage the degrees of conscious meditation are surmounted and unconscious meditation begins, till perfect knowledge is attained and Yoga is finally reached. This condition is called Samádhi.1
The first and second of these eight processes are likened to the sowing of seed in a field: the third and fourth are as the commencement of growth: the fifth is the flower; the sixth, seventh and eighth are regarded as the stages of fructification.
The last-named three-fold acts are termed Sanyama.1 At this period, the most extraordinary powers are witnessed in the adept which astonish the beholder.
The occult powers are termed Aiśvarya and are eight in number.
(1). Animá (molecularity), the power of minute disintegration so as to pass through the tissues of a diamond. (2). Mahimá (illimitability), capacity of prolongation so as to touch the moon. (3). Laghimá (tenuity), to possess such extreme levity as to ascend to the upper regions on a beam of light. (4). Garimá (gravity) to acquire illimitable ponderosity. In some works the word Prápti2 (accessibility), is used for the fourth term, and signifies to reach to any point at will. (5). Prákámya (irresistible will), to sink into the earth and to rise up elsewhere as if in water. (6). I´śitva (sovereignty), the power of creating or destroying. (7). Vaśitva (subjugation), to command the elements and their products. (8). Kámávasáyítva (self control), the fulfilment of every wish.3
Although this language may seem incredible in the eyes of those affected by the taint of narrow custom, those who acknowledge the wonderful power of God will find in it no cause of astonishment.
The doctrines of this great system are comprised in one Adhyáya or section, divided into four charaṇa,4 (feet or) chapters. The first is an exposition of the nature of Yoga meditation. The second on the means of its acquirement. The third, on the wonders of the occult powers. The fourth on the liberation of the soul.
The founder of this wonderful system was Jina, called also Arhat1 or Arhant. With regard to the Supreme Being, and the doctrines of voluntary actions, rewards, punishments, hell and heaven, they follow the Mímáṃsá and the Sánkhya. In Svar-loka twenty-six degrees are assigned to the last mentioned abode (heaven) in three groups of twelve, nine and five, in the highest of which dwell the most perfect among the chosen of God. Bodies are believed to be compounded of indivisible atoms. The four elements are composed of homogeneous atoms, and the substrate of each element is different. The world regarded in its atoms is eternal, but non-eternal in its form. Existence takes place on the union of five principles:— (1). Niyata (crude matter) potentiality of cause. (2). Kála, determinate time. (3). Svabháva inherent nature. (4). A´tmá the rational soul: (5). Púrvakṛita, the result of good and evil in former births. Some Ḥindu philosphers ascribe the creation to God, some to Time, and others to the results of actions, and others again to inherent nature (svabháva). Their belief is that the whole universe will not perish, but that some of every kind will survive from the whirlwind of non-existence whence creation will be renewed.
This sect allow only two predicaments:—Pramáṇa (proof) and Prameya (objects of thought). The first of these is two-fold:—(1) Pratyaksha, perception by the five external senses, and by the mind and the soul. The Nyáya, applies this term to the means by which perfect knowledge is obtained. (2). Paroksha (imperceptiblity), knowledge obtained not mediately through the senses.
Pratyaksha (perception) is two-fold. (I). Vyávahárika1
(conventional,
or practical): this is acquired by the five senses and manas, is employed
in external affairs, and called mati-jṅnána (mind-knowledge). This is
also two-fold, namely, that which (
Paroksha (imperceptibitity) is five-fold. (1). Smaraṇa,2 recollection of what is unseen. (2). Praty-abhijṅnána, knowledge derived from the witness of another. (3). Tarka, the knowledge of the mutual relation between subject and predicate. (4). Anumána, knowledge from inference, which is established in a series of ten terms, given in detail. (5). ´Sabda, the knowledge obtained from the narration of a speaker without partiality or affection, of clear understanding and true in speech.
Prameya (objects of thought) are six-fold and each is regarded as an eternal substance, and not an aggregate of a determinate measure of atoms; they are likewise held to be imperceptible to the eye and pervade all space. The first is the soul which is a subtile substance in which intelligence abides. It is to the body as the light of a lamp to a house and is believed to be the active agent, or passive recipient of good and evil. It is, of two kinds, Parátmá and Jivátmá. The first is restricted to the Supreme Being and is distinguished by four attributes. Ananta-jṅnána or analytic knowledge extending to the most minute atoms. Ananta-darśana or synthetic knowledge of things collectively. Ananta-vírya, infinite power. Ananta-sukha, infinite happiness.
They do not accept the doctrine of divine incarnations but believe that a man by virtue becomes omniscient, and his utterances in regard to the things appertaining to the spiritual and temporal life are the word of God, and such a one is termed Sákára-Paramesvara (Divinity in bodily form). In the six aras,3 of which mention has been made in a previous section, twenty-four such beings come into existence, and in the third and fourth, their earthly existence terminates.1
The first being of this series was A´dinátha, and the last, Mahávíra. Each of them is named a Jina, and wonderful legends are told of them which will be briefly noted later on. The Supreme Being is called Nirguṇa Paramesvara, or the Deity without qualities.
Jivátmá (soul) is variously distinguished. It may be two-fold, viz., locomotive and immovable, as a man or a tree: or three-fold, as man, woman, hermaphrodite: or four-fold namely, forms of men, of vegetable life, of beings of heaven, and those of hell: or five-fold, possessing but one sense,2 as the four elements and trees. And these also are of two kinds; (1). such as can be seen, (2). such as are too minute to be perceptible. Each of these (last) five possesses life and has the sense of touch. There are those that possess (at least) two senses,3 touch and taste, such as shell-fish, leeches &c. those with three, as the ant which has the additional sense of hearing: those of four, viz. flies and wasps which to the above three senses, add that of sight: those of five, mankind. There is a further division of soul into two kinds; those possessing an internal sense and such as are without it, as a leaf.4 The Nyáya school also hold this opinion. Since the first and fifth are of two kinds, animal life collectively does not exceed seven, and each may be classed under two heads: (1) Prajá-pati possessor of six powers, namely, of bodily form, of reception of food, of organs of sense, of the powers of speech of breathing, and the internal sense (manas): (2) Aprajá-pati, life which is incapable of these functions. All that possess but one sense, have four faculties, viz., capability of nourishment, assuming form, command of the organs of sense, inspiration and expiration of breath. All that possess two, three, four or five senses, without the internal sense, have five faculties, viz., the four former and that of speech. Those that possess the internal sense have six faculties.
They consider the conjunction in the soul of ten qualities, entitles it to be called living, otherwise it is dead; they are severally called práṇa,1 viz., the five senses, the internal sense, faculty of speech, reception of form, inspiration of breath, duration of life. Those that possess five senses are of four classes. (1). Devatá (celestial spirit); (2). Manusha (man); (3). Náraki (inhabitant of the infernal regions); (4). Tiryagyoni (animal creation). The Devatá is formed of a subtile luminous substance by the volition of the Deity, without the process of birth. Their bodies are not of flesh and bone, nor defiled by impurities, and their breathings are redolent of fragrance. They suffer not from maladies, nor does age steal away the freshness of youth. Whatever they desire is fulfilled; they can assume a thousand shapes, and they move at four fingers' breadth above the surface of the earth. They are of four classes:—
1. Bhavana-pati. The Jainas believe the earth to consist of seven tiers superimposed one above the other. The earth inhabited by mankind includes a space of 180,000 yojanas. The intervening region between one thousand yojanas and as many below, is the location of the Bhavana-patis. They are of ten2 orders, each governed by two rulers, one for the northern, the other for the southern region. The colour, appearance, raiment, food and modes of life of each are separate. Their duration of life extends between a minimum of ten thousand and a maximum of an ocean (ságara) of years, and this is considered the lowest order of all.
2. Vyantara. These inhabit a region extending between a thousand yojanas above and a hundred below, and they pass likewise into the sphere allotted to men. They are of sixteen orders, each governed by two rulers. Their age extends from ten thousand years to one palyopáma.1
3. Jyotishka. Their location is seven hundred and ninety yojanas above the level the earth, and one hundred and ten yojanas is its eastern2 limit. They consist of five orders (of luminaries), the first are stars: the second, suns throned at a distance of ten yojanas above the stars: the third are moons, eighty yojanas higher than the suns: the fourth, constellations of twenty-eight mansions: the fifth, planets at an altitude of four yojanas above the mansions, eighty-eight in number. Of these the five most important are Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Mars and Saturn with an interval of three yojanas in altitude between them severally. The duration of life of each of the five, ranges between the eighth part of a palya at the lowest, to one palya and a hundred thousand years as an extreme limit.
4. Vaimánika. Their abode is the highest of all, and they are of two orders. The first, kalpupapanna, (existing age), dwell in twelve zones of heaven each with a special presiding deity, but four have (only) two regents. These ten principalities possess ten illustrious distinctions, (1) a just prince, (2) a capable minister, (3) a benevolent sage, (4) loyal counsellors, (5) sword bearers, (6) guards, (7) commanders of seven armies of elephants, horses, chariots, bulls, footmen,3 sword players and musicians, (8) administrators of state, (9) news reporters, and (10) sweepers. This sublime order is said to dwell at a little less than the distance of a ráju1 in altitude. The second order is kalpátíta (past age). They do not occupy themselves with others, but keep aloof from friendship, enmity, governance and subjection, and are engaged only in contemplation of the Deity. Above these again are twelve abodes of rest in nine tiers,2 one above another, and five others like a face, two above, and one below and one between, making fourteen tiers in all.
They consider the world to be composed of three spheres.3 (1). Manusha-loka, nine hundred yojanas from the lowest extremity of the earth to nine hundred above. This is the sphere of men. The earth is said to be one ráju in length and the same in breadth, and within 4,500,000 yojanas of this space, mankind dwell. Below this is (2). Patála-loka. Its extent is nine hundred yojanas less than seven rájus. The second is twice the size of the first, and to each tier is added a ráju so that the seventh is something less than seven rájus. (3). Svarga-loka is the celestial region, and is a little less than seven rájus high. Its inhabitants possess five organs of sense. Among them the Vaimánikas dwell in twenty-six orders which represent paradise. They attain to these bodies and enjoy happiness through good works. Eight orders of Vaimánikas dwell within five rájus, and four in the sixth ráju. Fourteen orders of the inferior class occupy one ráju. A ráju is the distance traversed by an iron ball of three and a half Akbari ser's weight, thrown downwards and continuing to fall for a period of six months six days and twelve ghaṛis. It is said that for six karoh above the twenty-six orders aforesaid, there is a circular area like crystal.1 Its length is 4,500,000 yojanas and its breadth the same, with a height of eight yojanas. After traversing a distance of three and five-sixth of a Karoh upwards, the sacred haven of final liberation is reached where men are absorbed in the divinity as light in light.
The ages of the gods extend from something less than a palyopama to not more than a Ságara.2 The four classes of deities including two orders of the Vaimániḳas have a stature of seven cubits; the third and fourth are of six cubits; the fifth and sixth, of five; the seventh and eighth, of four; from the ninth to the twelfth, of three: from the thirteenth to the twenty-first of two, and from the twenty-second to the twenty-sixth of one cubit, but all of them possess the power of assuming various shapes. All the deities are said to have the desire of food, but it is not taken by the mouth, as they are satisfied by mere volition. Each of the deities who arrives at the age of ten thousand years, requires food every other day, and breathes once during the time in which a healthy man would breath forty-nine times. Those whose age extends beyond this term to one Ságara, eat once between a minimum and maximum of three and nine days and breathe once between four and eighteen gharis. Those who live beyond the period of a Ságara, eat once after a thousand years, and breathe once in fifteen days. Such as live to a still greater term than this, for each Ságara, allow upwards of a thousand years to elapse before they touch food, and in the same proportion of time, increasing intervals of fifteen days pass before a breath is drawn. They also believe that all the deities including two orders of the fourth class, (the Vaimánika), have sexual intercourse after the manner of mankind, but pregnancy does not take place: the third and fourth orders by conjunction and the sense of touch: the fifth and sixth by sight, and the seventh and eighth, by hearing; four other orders, by mere effort of imagination, while fourteen orders of the second class are innocent of this intercourse. These are said to attain to this eminence by good works. Extraordinary legends are told of these beings, of which let this little from among much be a sufficiency.
The mundane (manushya), consists of (souls) of two kinds:—(1). Saṃjña, possessing the power of apprehension, and (2). Asaṃjña, without power of apprehension. The latter appear (as animalcula) in the flesh, blood and saliva of men and do not live more than the space of two ghaṛis. The Saṃjña class is sub-divided into two. The Jainas apportion the earth into two parts, and assign one to each division. In the first, commands and prohibitions are in full force, and happiness and misery are the recompense of good and evil actions. Fifteen considerable portions of the earth are allotted to this division.
The Jainas believe that during the six aras, the extent of which has been mentioned in a former section, twelve Chakravartís successively appear. Thirty-two thousand kingdoms are beneath his sway, and thirty-two thousand princes are subject to him. He possesses 8,400,000 elephants and as many horses and chariots. He has likewise fourteen thousand ministers of state, nine hundred and thirty millions of footmen, eighty thousand sages, three hundred thousand cuirassiers, five hundred thousand torch-bearers, thirty millions of musicians, sixty-four thousand wedded wives, one hundred and twenty-eight thousand female slaves, sixteen thousand mines of gems, nineteen thousand mines of gold and twenty-eight thousand of other minerals, sixteen thousand provinces of barbarians (mlechchhas), that is, of races foreign to his institutions, thirty-two thousand capital cities, sixteen thousand royal residencies, three hundred and sixty millions of cooks for the royal table,1 and three hundred and sixty for his private service.2 Many other endowments are attributed to him. The first cycle of these began with Rájá Bharata (Chakravarti), son of A´dinátha. Some of these on account of their good works, are translated to heaven while others go down to hell. They assert that nine other individuals are born, entitled Vásudevas, which is a rank possessing half the powers of a Chakravartí, and they believe that these dignitaries descend into a hell, and that Kṛishṇa is among their number. Nine other persons, designated Baladevas, are said to exist who possess half the powers of a Vásudeva.5 Over all these, the Tirthankara, who will be presently described, is the supreme head. Much has been written regarding the denizens of this sphere.
There is another extensive region, where its people have garments of the leaves of its trees1 and their food is wild fruits or the sweet verdure produced by its soil. They are beautiful of countenance and pleasing in disposition. Their stature varies from one to three karoh, in height. One son or daughter is born to them after which they die. They are called Juglyah2 and when they grow to adolescence, they marry, and their duration of life extends from one to three palyopama.
It is said that those who have not been charitable in deed, nor practised good works, pass after death among this race, and obtain the recompense thereof and bear no burden of pain.
The Nárakis, like the devatás, can assume various shapes and many of their conditions, but their aspect is terrible and always in dejection and gloom. In the six degrees in which hell is said to be divided, they are agitated in burning torment, and though in agony are ever maleficent and from innate wickedness torture each other.
The class called Bhavana-pati have ingress to three degrees of this sphere and are the ministers of chastisement to these fiends. The stature of the dwellers in the first degree is from three to thirty one cubits and six fingers, and their age between ten thousand years and one Ságara. The stature of those in the second degree is double that of the first, and this proportion of increase runs through the remaining degrees: the duration of life in the second degree is from one to three Ságaras. The age of the denizens of the third degree extends from a minimum of three Ságaras and attains to a maximum of seven: of the fourth, from seven to ten; of the fifth, to seventeen; of the sixth, to twenty-two; and of the seventh,3 to thirty-three.
Tiryagyoni signifies the rest of the animal creation and is three-fold:— (1). aquatic: (2). terrestrial: (3). aerial. The first named order is five-fold, viz., (1). acquatic animals like the Súśmár,1 which resemble men, elephants and horses &c. (2). fishes of various kinds: (3). the tortoise: (4). the Karáh,2 an animal in the shape of a tent-rope, four yards long and more, which twines itself round the legs of elephants and other animals and prevents their getting out of the water: (5). the crocodile.
The second order is of three kinds: quadrupeds like cattle: those that creep on their bellies, as snakes: and such as can move upon two feet like the weasel.
The third order is of four kinds: two domesticated with man, viz., whose pinions are of feathers, like the pigeon, or of skin, like the bat; and two others that fly in the blissful abodes of the gods, each of which is described with its peculiar characteristics, and many circumstances are related of them. The duration of life in the first class is from two ghaṛis3 to one púrva which is equal to seventy kṛors of lakhs and fifty-six thousand kṛors of years. (70,560,000,000,000). The second and third classes in their minimum are like the first, but the second does not extend beyond three palyopama, while the third has no determinate limit. They assert that the duration of age among such as have but one sense, if formed of the subtile elements, is two ghaṛis, and the gross body of the earth does not endure above twenty-two thousand years, nor that of water, above seven thousand; nor of fire, above three days, nor of wind, above three thousand years. Such as have two organs of sense live twelve years; such as possess three organs, forty-nine days, and four organs, six months. The animal creation possessing five organs of sense together with mankind have a life of three palyopama, while the Nárakis and devatás live thirty-three Ságaras but not beyond this term.
In the interchange of embodiment of these four4 classes, they allow twenty-four habitations to the soul which enters into air, fire, water, earth, the vegetable creation of two, three and four organs of sense, quadrupeds born of the womb, the ten classes of the infernal regions, the Bhavanapati, Vyantara, Jyotishka, Vaimánika, men and devatás. After death, it enters into one of the following five, viz., mankind, the animal creation with five organs of sense, water, earth, and vegetable forms. The souls of men may come and go through twenty-two forms and when they pass into air or fire, no more assume human shape. Hell-bodies may assume two forms, those of men or of animals with five senses born of the womb, and their lives like those of the Juglyah1 class are not of any considerably length, nor do they ever enter paradise. Those of the seventh degree of hell, do not even enter human bodies, but each of the (other) three kinds of animals having five organs of sense, have entry and exit through all the twenty-four habitations.2
The arithmeticians of this sect apply the term laksha to one hundred thousand, which the vulgar pronounce lakh. Ten lakhs make a prayuta,3 and ten prayutas are termed a koṭi, called generally a kṛor. One hundred kṛors make an arba (Ṣansk-arbuda), and ten arba a kharba, and ten kharbas a nikharba,4 ten nikharbas, a mahá-saroja,5 called also padma. Ten padmas make a ´Sankha, ten ´Sankha, a Samudra, called also Korákor.
They state that if of a seven day's child of the Juglyah age, the hair, being four thousand and ninety-six times as thick as the hair of the Delhi people, be taken and cut up till further sub-division be impracticable, and a well, four kaṛoh in length, breadth and depth, be filled with such particles, and a single one of the aforesaid particles be taken out of the well at the expiry of each hundred years till the well be emptied, this period would constitute a palyopama. The lapse of ten Samudra of a palyopama constitutes a Ságara.
Having now discussed the first of the (six) objects classed under Prameya, I briefly mention the other five. The second, A´káśa, ether, is a subtile substance, eternal and all-pervading, possessing neither intelligence nor soul. The third, kála, time, is a substance like the preceding, but not all-pervading. It circumscribes the terrestrial abode of man. The fourth Pudgala6 (matter or substance), is four-fold. If not divisible (atomic), nor compounded with another body, it is called pramáṇa, and if in conjunction, pradeśa. When, several pradeśa unite, they are called deśa, and the conjunction of several deśas is termed śkandha.7 The first is accounted eternal and has five qualities, colour, odour, phlegm, and two out of eight opposite states of gravity or tenuity, rigidity or softness. heat or coldness, greediness or its contrary.1 The fifth is Dharmástikáya, (the predicament virtue). It is a substance by the instrumentality of which, the rational soul and mind (manas), and matter (pudgala), are capable of movement, as a fish by means of water. The sixth is Adharmástikáya (the predicament vice). This is a substance, quiescent, and favourable to repose.2 In some works there is mention of nine first principles called tattvas, viz., (1). Jíva,3 soul; (2). Ajíva, the contrary to this, as ether, time, &c. (3). Punya; (4). Pápa. By the conjunction of a multiplicity of matter and soul-forms, joy and sorrow, ease and pain are produced and this conjunction is termed karman (works), and is also distinguished as prakṛiti.4 All that is productive of virtue is called punya, and pápa is vice. Karman is eight-fold: (1).—Jṅnáná-varaṇiya (shrouding of knowledge), forms of matter that by their conjunction veil each of the five kinds of knowledge that have been noticed. (2). Darśana-varaṇíya (shrouding of study), shrouds apprehension by the five organs of sense. (3). Vedaníya (individual consciousness), conjunction of matter by means of which the soul is affected by joy or sorrow. (4). Mohanîya, (producing delusion), conjunction of atoms which causes good to be mistaken for evil and the reverse. (5). Áyus (age), conjunction of atoms on which depends the continuance of animal life. (6). Náman, (name), conjunction of things5 which is the creative complement of genus, species and individual existence. (7). Gotra (race), the conjunction of atoms by which the soul assumes the forms of eminent and ignoble persons. (8). Antaráya (interference), conjunction of atoms by which men abstain from works, are unable to take nourishment, have no inclination for sexual intercourse, take no profit in trade nor practise liberality or mortification.
V. A´srava1 (flow, movement), evil actions of five kinds, viz bodily injury, falsehood, theft, incontinence, unbridled desire.
VI. Saṃvara (stopping), is abstention from the above five actions.
VII. Bandha (bondage), is the union of matter with soul.
VIII. Nirjará is the gradual disruption of conjoined atoms by the mortification of the body.2
IX. Moksha, called also mukti, is the total disseverance of atoms, which cannot be attained without knowledge and works. As when a firo takes place in the dwelling of a lame and a blind man, neither of them alone can escape, but the blind man may take the lame on his back, and by the vision of the one and the movement of the other they both may reach a place of safety.
It is said that without the concurrence of three conditions, this great end cannot be secured: (1). knowledge of the Supreme Being: (2). the acquisition of a guide who makes no distinction between praise and blame, wounding and healing: (3). constancy in good works. These three take rise in obedience and service, by which knowledge is gained. This latter is the chief source of a passionless state (virága) which annihilates the impulse (ásvara) of the embodied spirit, whence proceeds the closing (saṃvara) of the passage to such impulses, and this again incites men to austerity whereby they are occupied in the mortification of the spirit and the body. This mortification is of twelve kinds:—(1). not to eat at particular times. Formerly abstinence from solid food for a whole year was practised, and by some for nine months, but in these days six months is the longest duration: (2). to eat sparingly, and to beg for food from not more than five houses, and to fast till the next day if none be forthcoming, and to abstain from five things: viz., milk, curds, butter, oil of sesame and sweets1: (3). mortification of the body in enduring the sun's heat: (4). to take rest on hot sand, (5). to endure nakedness in cold: (6). to draw up the arms and legs and sit on the haunches. They say that it requires a long time before these six practices can be successfully accomplished, and many fail in their performance.
Regarding the expiation of sins, strange penances are prescribed for each transgression, such as, obedience to the religious director; service of ascetics; reading of voluminous books; bowing the head in meditation. This latter must not be for less than two ghaṛis, and some among former devotees continued it for twelve years: to stand with the arms hanging down. and to refrain from movement. These six exercises quickly lead to perfection.
There are forty-five great texts among this sect, of which twelve are termed Angas, considered to be sacred books. (1). A´cháránga, rule of conduct for ascetics. (2). Sútrakṛitánga,2 containing three hundred and sixty precepts of devotees and demonstrations of each. (3) Sthánánga, in which from one to ten (acts) essential to purity are enumerated, beginning with one, applicable to the upper and lower worlds, and so throughout the series to ten. (4). Samaváyánga; herein from ten to ten millions are enumerated and divers other truths. (5). Bhagavatyánga; this contains thirty-six thousand questions put by Gautama to Mahádeva1 and the answers thereto. (6). Jṅnátádharmakathá, containing thirty-five million ancient legends. (7). Upásakadaśá, an account of ten devotees of Mahadeva.1 (8). Antakṛiddaśá, on those who have attained the eternal beatitude of liberation. (9). Anuttaropapáti-kadaśánga,2 on the blessed who for their good works have passed into the twenty-sixth degree of paradise. (10). Praśnavyákaraṇánga, mentions various works, the source of good and evil acts. (11). Vipákaśrutánga, former consequences of actions, which having borne the recompense of good and evil are forever laid to rest. (12). Chaudah-púrvánga (anga of fourteen Púrvas), containing questions that concern mankind generally, with various reflections and classes of acts.
The twenty-four Tírthankaras having in these deliverances revealed the will of the Supreme Being, their successors collected them and reduced them to writing. Twelve of them are termed Upángas, in which the purport of the former books has been concisely recorded with some additional matter. Four books are called Múla-Sútras, in which are given the usages of religious preceptors, the mode of begging, manner of life, mortification, worship of God and rules of composition. Six works are termed Chedda-grantha, on expiation of sin. Ten others are called Páinna,1 explanation of the anatomy of the limbs, the manner of birth in animals, and all that takes place at the dissolution of elemental connection, and other subjects. Another work designated Nandi-Sútra, treats of the five kinds of knowledge, which have been already mentioned.
The devotees of this sect are called Yatis.2 ´Sishya (disciple), is an inquirer who enters on this path. Ganeśa-śishya3 is an ascetic who for six months at a stretch restrains the inordinate spirit within the prison of freedom from desire. If he eats one day, he fasts two, and defiles not his hand with milk, curds, butter, oil nor sweets. He eats only of a little parched wheat thrown into hot water, and begs for alms only from one house; his nights are spent till morn in prayer, and five hundred times during each night he prostrates himself in worship, and in the day reads the book of Bhagavati.1
The Pravartaka (founder), has much the same character, but on account of his zeal and experience is nominated by the chief religious authority of the time over the pilgrims in this desolate wilderness, to superintend their daily actions and appoint suitable penance for such as are indolent and inclined to ease. The Sthávira (elder), is an assistant to the preceding who controls the refractory and aids the languishing. The Ratnádhika, or Paṇíyása as he is also called, is zealous in the service of God wherever duty calls and thither speeds to remedy disorder: he also prepares the place for the A´chárya or spiritual teacher, and has the care of his garments and the settlement of disputes among the ascetics is committed to him. The Upádhyáya (sub-teacher), has nearly the same rank as an Áchárya, and the disciples verify under his direction the words of the sacred texts and the questions thereto appertaining. These teachers possess nothing of their own but the garments which will be particularised later. The A´chárya is a personage of a genial disposition, reverent of aspect, pleasant of speech, gráve, learned and benevolent. He must be acquainted with the proofs of the doctrines of his sect, and learned in the precepts of the other eight schools and skilled to refute them, and no treatise should be unknown to him. The burden of the care of his flock lies upon his shoulders, and to promote the welfare of his institute must be his chief aim. Garments and books that are in excess of ordinary requirements are in his keeping for supply at need to inquirers of this road. The Gaṇadhara by fullness of knowledge and good works arrives at an exalted degree of wisdom, and possesses the eight miraculous endowments mentioned in the Pátañjala system. He is the representative of the Jina. The Jina who is also called Tírthankara (creating a passage through the circuit of life), surpasses this dignity and attains omniscience, is beautiful of countenance, and perfect in the moral order. His breath is redolent with fragrance and his words full of wisdom. His flesh and blood are white, and none has ever seen him eat or defecate. Neither sickness nor sweat nor dirt contaminate his holy person. His nails and hair grow not long. His words fall so harmoniously that every listener might deem that his speech was music. In whatsoever land he resides, snakes, scorpions and other venomous reptiles disappear, neither excess nor deficiency in rainfall occurs, and war, pestilence and drought cease. When he moves abroad, the trees are voiceful in praise, and many ministering spirits attend to guard him. It is said that his beatified soul is imprisoned in the ventricular cavity of his form by a special connection, and in contradistinction to men in general, he is illumined by three kinds of apprehension, obtains cognition through the organs of sense and mind (manas) and the purport of all books is laid open to him. He discerns all that has form whether far or near, and after being born, and through the discipline of austerities, he becomes cognisant of the secret thoughts of men and arrives at the sublime degree of omniscience. These qualities belong to the whole twenty-four Tírthankaras of whom mention has been made.
The ascetics of this body have no intercourse with women, and avoid the spot where the sound of her voice is heard. They abstain from meat, fruit and sweemeats. They cook no food in their own dwellings, and at the meal-time of others, they approach a house and there stand and announce themselves by the words, “dharma lábha” that is, ‘he who doeth good, receiveth a reward,” and without importunity, take whatever of daily cooked food is brought. They may not take away1 milk, oil and rice together for food, and without being covetous of the taste thereof must speedily swallow their meal. And they must not knowingly accept food cooked especially for them or for the sake of mendicants in general, nor which has been brought from out of a dark room, nor fetched by mounting from a low to an elevated place, nor for which the lock of a door has been opened nor brought out having been previously purchased.1 They drink nothing but warm water and do not eat or drink2 during the night. They never light a lamp nor have a fire in the house in which they dwell. They may not pick up any thing fallen nor wash any member of the body but that which is actually soiled. They must avoid avarice and anger, and abstain from falsehood, from injury to life and from theft, and may have no worldly goods, but only necessary raiment. This, in other than winter time, consists of three robes. One of these is used as a loin cloth, a second thrown over the shoulder like a belt and the third worn over the uncovered head.3 In winter a special woollen garment is added. They have also a cloth a little more than a span and a half in length and breadth which they keep folded in four. This is placed over the mouth when reading and the two ends are stuffed into the ears so that no insect may enter and be injured, nor the person nor the book be defiled by saliva. They also carry a Dharmadhvaja4 made of woollen hairs like a tassel, bound with scarlet cloth and fixed in a wooden handle. As they constantly sit on the ground, they first gently sweep it with both hands that nothing may remain beneath. The elders of this sect, who have been briefly mentioned, spread an old woollen cloth by way of carpet, and spend their days profitably in fasting and good works. Every six months they pull out the hairs of their head with their hands and nails, and go barefoot among thorns and stony places, but in the rainy season they do not stir abroad.5
The laity of this sect are called ´Srávaka. They observe, firstly, the following twelve rules. I. Never to injure the innocent. II. To avoid (the following) five kinds of untruths which are accounted great falsehoods; (1) false testimony, (2) breach of trust, (3) regarding land, (4) in praise and and blame of others, (5) concerning a cow. III. Not to stain their hands with dishonesty. IV. Not to look upon the wife of another. V. To be content with a moderate share of worldly goods. VI. To give the surplus in charity. VII. On journeys, to move stated distances. VII. To determine the daily need of food and other necessaries, and to live accordingly. IX. Not to approach a spot where a satí has taken place or a robber executed. X. To set apart two or three ghaṛis of the twenty-four hours, and with complete detachment of heart to employ these in devotion to the bountiful Creator. XI. At the hour of sleep to resolve on abstention from further food, and effacing the suggestions of desire, to lay down to rest. XII. On the 8th, 14th, 15th, and 1st day of the 1st quarter of the moon, to abstain from food and drink throughout the day, and to feed the first beggar (met with) on the morn of the break of fast. The points aforesaid should be gone over every day and at the time of rest, and the conscience be therein examined.
The claim of rectitude of life in this austere sect is applicable to a man who fulfils the following conditions:—He should constantly listen to the reading of the sacred texts, perform works of charity, make a practice of praising the virtuous, defile not his tongue in disparagement of another, especially of temporal rulers. He should take in wedlock one who is his equal, and be ever in fear of committing sin. He should conform to the laws of the land wherever he abides, and should so choose his dwelling that it be not public to every passer-by, nor yet so secluded that none can discover it, and it should not have more than two or three doors. He should choose good neighbours and associate only with the virtuous. He should be dutiful to his father and mother, and avoid a city or a province invaded by foreign troops. He must regulate his expenses in accordance with his income, and make his dress conform to the same standard. He must be assiduous in reading the divine books, and avoid an unrestrained spirit in the regulation of his life.1 He must take his meals at stated times, and observe due measure in his regard for worldly wealth, and the getting thereof and attachment thereunto, and should be zealous in hospitality to a guest, an ascetic, and in the care of the sick. He should not be self-opiniated, nor a lover of his own speech. He must prize learning. He must not journey out of season, nor into a country where he cannot practise his religion, nor enter into a quarrel without discerning his ally from his enemy. He must sympathize with his kindred, and be provident and far-sighted, and recognize the claims of gratitude, and so bear himself in his outward conduct that men may hold him in regard. He must be modest, gentle and courteous in demeanour, and exert himself in the interests of others, and subduing his internal enemies, hold his five senses under the control of reason.
The prohibitions to be observed by both the ascetics and the laity are, to abstain from flesh-meat, wine, honey, butter, opium, snow, ice, hail, everything that grows beneath the earth, fruits whose names are unknown, or that contain small seeds, and from eating at night.
The Jaina institutes recognize two orders, the Svetambaras (clad in white), and Digambaras (sky-clad). The latter wear no clothes and go naked. According to the Digambaras, a woman cannot attain final liberation.1 They say that when any one arrives at the sublime degree of mukti, he needs no food till he dies. They are at one with the Svetambaras on many points. The writer has met with no one who had personal knowledge of both orders and his account of the Digambaras has been written as it were in the dark, but having some acquaintance with the learned of the Svetambara order, who are also known as ´Sewra2 he has been able to supply a tolerably full notice. From ancient times, throughout the extent of Hindustan, the Bráhmans and Jains have been the repositories of knowledge and ceremonial observance, but from shortsightedness have held each other in reproach. The Bráhmans worship Kṛishna as a deity, while the Jainas relegate him to service in hell. The Bráhmans deem it better to face a raging elephant or a ravening lion than to meet with one of this sect. His Majesty, however, in his earnest search after truth, has partially dispelled the darkness of the age by the light of universal toleration, and the numerous sectaries, relinquishing their mutual aversion, live in the happy accomplishment of a common harmony.
The founder of this rational system of faith is known as Buddha, and is called by many names.1 One of these is ´Sákyamuni, vulgarly pronounced Shákmúni. It is their belief that by the efficacy of a life of charity, he attained to the highest summit of wisdom, and becoming omniscient, secured the treasure of final liberation His father was Rája Sudhodana, prince of Behár, and his mother's name was Máyá. He was born by way of the navel2 and was surrounded by a brilliant light, and the earth trembled, and a stream of the water of the Ganges showered down upon him. At the same time he took seven steps, uttered some sublime words, and said, “This will be my last birth.” The astrologers foretold that on his attaining the age of twenty-nine years and seven days, he would become a mighty ruler, institute a new religion, and accomplish his final liberation. At the very time foretold, be renounced the world and retired into the desert. For a short period he lived at Benares, Rájgir,3 and other sacred places, and after many wanderings reached Kashmír.
Many of Hindu race, and from the coasts, and from Kashmír, Tibet and Scythia were converted by him. From the date of his death to the present time, which is the fortieth year of the Divine Era, two thousand nine hundred and sixty-two years have elapsed.1 He possessed the gift of an efficacious will and the power of performing miracles. He lived one hundred and twenty years.2 The learned among the Persians and Arabs, name the religious of this order Bhikshus;3 in Tibet they are styled Lámas. For a long time past scarce any trace of them has existed in Hindustan, but they are found in Pegu, Tenasserim and Tibet. The third time that the writer accompanied His Majesty to the delightful valley of Kashmír, he met with a few old men of this persuasion, but saw none among the learned, nor observed anything like what is described by Háfiz A´bru and Banákati. The Bráhmans regard him as the ninth avatára, but do not accept the doctrine commonly ascribed to him, and deny that he is their author.
They hold the Deity to be undefiled by incarnation, and with the Sánkhya, Mímáṃsá, and Jaina systems, do not consider him the author of creation. The world, they deem to be without beginning or end, and the whole universe to be at one moment resolved into nothingness, and at another created again as before.1 They accept the doctrine of the recompense of good and evil deeds, and of hell and heaven, and knowledge, according to them, is a quality of the rational soul. The ascetics of this religion shave their heads, and wear garments of leather and red cloth.
They are frequent in their ablutions, and refuse nothing that is given them as food, and hold all that dies of itself as killed by the act of God, and therefore lawful. They hold no commerce with women, and kill nothing that has life, and looking on plants as possessing it, they refrain from digging them up or cutting them.
Their spiritual energies are directed to six objects: the repression of anger, the pursuit of wisdom, soliciting alms,1 true understanding of the worship of the Supreme Being, fortitude in austerities, perpetual commune with God. Three things are affirmed by them to be the source of goodness: knowledge, disinterestedness, freedom from envy; and twelve seats the source of good and evil, viz., the five senses, their faculties,2 the common sensory, and intellect. These twelve, they term A´yatana (seats).
There are four objects of thought which in place of padártha (categories), they call (chaturvidha) A´rya-satya, four sublime truths. The first is Duḥka-satya reality of misery, which is of five kinds. (1). Vijṅnána, (sensation). (2). Vedaná, consciousness, the recompense of good or evil. (3), Sanjñá, name or denomination of things. (4). Sanskára, (impression), aggregate of merit and demerit. Some assert that since all things are in a state of momentary flux and reflux of existence, the intellectual consciousness thereof is designated by this term. (5). Rúpa (form), comprehends the five elements, and their evolutes, and because all these five produce bodily sufferance, they are distinguished under this head.3
The second, Samudaya-Satya (progressive accumulation of evil), is all that arises from desire and anger, and which under its influence says, ‘I am,’ or, ‘that is mine.’
The third is Márga-satya (reality of means), the habit of thought that the world is in momentary annihilation and reproduction. The fourth is Nirodha-satya (reality of annihilation) which they call Mukti or final liberation. Ten conditions are necessary to attain this degree: (I). Charity. (II). Abstention from evil and practising virtue, that is, to refrain from the following ten actions, viz., taking life, molesting, taking that which is not given, incontinence, falsehood, speaking ill of the good, irascibility, idle speech, evil intention, intercourse prohibited by religious precept. Seven duties are to be fulfilled. Respect for the religious guide and spiritual director; veneration of idols; observing the service of others;1 praise of the good; influencing to good works by gentle speech; perseverance through success or failure in sustaining others in virtue: learning the duties of worship. (III). To be neither elated nor depressed by praise or blame. (IV). To sit in a particular posture. (V). To introduce an idol into a temple which they call chaitya. (VI). To regard the things of the world as they really are. (VII). To be zealous in the seven practices of Yoga prescribed in the Pátañjala system. (VIII). To acquire the habit of five duties: viz., a true and firm acceptance of the commands of the religious director; to be mindful of them and to carry them out: to reduce the body and spirit by rigid austerities; to efface from the heart all external impression; to keep the mind fixed only on the Supreme Being. (IX). To strengthen the bonds of knowledge so that they cannot be broken. (X). To enter upon the knowledge by which final liberation is accomplished. Pramáṇa, proof, with this sect, consists of pratyaksha (perception), and átman2 (self), and there are two causes of knowledge, evidence of the senses, and demonstration. The first is four-fold, viz., apprehension by the five senses, or perception by the common sensory or apprehension of the knowledge of the things themselves, or when by reason of the mortification3 of the senses, the non-apparent and the visible become identical.
In regard to inference and the exposition of the external percipibile4 their argumentation is lengthy and extremely subtile.
The Bauddhas are divided into four sects.
1. The Vaibháshikas, like the Nyáya school, believe in separate indivisible atoms for each of the four elements but perceptible by the eye; and with them existence is predicable of two entities, cognition and its objects, the latter being apprehended by the senses.
2. The Sautrántikas affirm that objects are cognised by inference.
3. The Yogácháras admit only intellect which produces the forms of objects.
The Mádhyamikas hold both cognition and objects to be void (śúnya Hindi sun) and confound existence and non-existence.1
Many treatises have been written on each of these divisions and there is considerable variance of opinion on questions of objective and subjective existence. Three sciences are regarded by them as important; the science of proof: the science of administratiou: the science of the interior life.
Chárváka, after whom this school is named, was an unenlightened Bráhman. Its followers are called by the Bráhmans, Nástikas or Nihilists. They recognise no existence apart from the four elements, nor any source of perception save through the five organs of sense. They do not believe in a God nor in immaterial substances, and affirm faculty of thought to result from the equilibrium of the aggregate elements. Paradise, they regard as a state in which man lives as he chooses, free from the control of another, and hell the state in which he lives subject to another's rule. The whole end of man, they say, is comprised in four things: the amassing of wealth, women, fame and good deeds. They admit only of such sciences as tend to the promotion of external order, that is, a knowledge of just administration and benevolent government. They are somewhat analogous to the sophists in their views and have written many works in reproach of others, which rather serve as lasting memorials of their own ignorance.
(Aṭhára Vidyá).
Having taken a brief survey of the nine schools of philosophy existing in this country, I proceed to state some of the points on which the Bráhmans of the first six systems are agreed and thus brighten the interest of this exposition.
They say that he has attained the summit of knowledge who has garnered his stores of wisdom from this number of sciences and by fathoming their depths, satisfied the desire of his heart.
The first division consists of the Ṛig Veda: the second is the Yajur Veda: the third is the Sáma Veda; and the fourth, the Atharvan.
These four are considered to be divine books, as already mentioned. Each of them treats of four matters:—(1). Vidhi, precept and its cogency; (2). Arthaváda,1 praise and its recompense; (3). Mantra, invocation and prayer which are profitable in particular cases; (4). Námadheya, appellation of important acts. Each of them also treats of three things:—(1). Karma, exterior works; (2). Upásaná, religious meditation; (3). Jṅnáná, perfected knowledge.
The fifth, the Puráṇas. Eighteen distinct works are styled by this name. They explain in a clear manner the difficulties occurring in the four Vedas above mentioned, and each of them treats of the following five subjects:— (1). The creation of the world. (2). The dissolution thereof. (3). Genealogies of various families. (4). Account of the fourteen Manvantaras. These are fourteen Manus or holy spirits who, during the whole life of Brahmá, will appear successively for the guidance of mankind, and sustain by their power the burden of the world. The life of each is seventy-one times the four ages, a revolution of the four ages being four million three hundred and twenty thousand years.1 They likewise mention the fourteen Indras associated with them, (for they say that during Brahmá's life, fourteen deities will successively rule the celestial regions), and the actions by means of which they attain to this dignity. There are further the legendary narratives of celebrated monarchs.
The names of the Puráṇas are:—(1) Matsya. (2). Márkaṇḍa. (3). Bhavishya. (4). Bhágavata. (5). Brahma-vaivarta. (6). Brahmáṇḍa. (7). Brahma. (8). Váyu. (9). Vámana. (10). Vishṇu. (11). Váráha. (12). Agni. (13). Nárada. (14). Padma. (15). Linga. (16). Kúrma. (17). Skanda. (18). Garúḍa.2
There are eighteen other books called Upa-puráṇas, explanatory of the foregoing, which are said by some to be of recent origin.3 Their names are:—(1). Sanatkumára, originally Saura, so called from the name of its compiler. (2). Náradíya. This was also the name of a Puráṇa and the same may be said of some others. The Upa-puráṇas in fact, contain accounts not given in the Puráṇas, and they are styled by the designations of their originals. (2). Nárasinha. (3). ´Sivadharma. (4). Durvásasa. (5). Kápila. (6). Mánava. (7). ´Sáukara.4 (8). Auśanaśa. (9). Váruṇa. (10). Brahmáṇḍa. (11). Kálí and also Káliká. (12). Máheśvara. (13). Nánda. (14). ´Sámba. (15). A´ditya. (16) Páráśara. (17). Bhágavata. (18). Kúrma.
The sixth of the sciences is called Dharma-´Sástra, (institutes of the law) or doctrine relating to good works. This is also taken from the Vedas, and accompanied by a multiplicity of detail. It is also called Sṃriti,1 and has a similar number of divisions. The principal subjects of these books are three. The duties of the four castes regarding religious worship, the duties of administration, and the expiation of sins.
The names of the eighteen codes of memorial law (smṛiti) are as follows:—
(1). Manu. (2). Yájṅnavalkya. (3). Atri. (4). Angiras. (5). Uśanas (6). Gautama. (7). Paráśara. (8). ´Sankha Likhita. (9). Vishṇu. (10). Háríta. (11). Vasishṭha. (12). Yama. (13). ´Sátátapa. (14). A´pastamba. (15). Kátyáyana. (16). Vṛihaspati. To these some have added the following two. (17). Vyása. (18). Daksha.2
The names of the eighteen Upa-smṛiti or minor law codes are—
(1). Angiras. (2). Jábáli. (3). Náchiketa. (4). Skanda. (5). Laugákshi. (6). Káśyapa. (7). Vyása. (8). Sanatkumára. (9). Shatrzu.3 (10). Janaka. (11). Vyághra. (12). Kátyáyana. (13). Játukarṇya. (14). Kapinjala. (15). Baudháyana. (16). Kaṇáda. (17). Viśvámitra. (18). Sumantu.
The seventh is ´Sikshá (Phonetics), the science of letters.1
The eighth is Kalpa, ceremonial, a science which treats of ten kinds of duties from the beginning of marriage to the time when the son is invested with the Brahmanical thread; viz., the marriage; cohabitation: the third month from pregnancy to the fifth: the sixth to the eighth: the birth: the naming of the child: carrying him out to see the sun: feeding him: cutting his hair: investing him with the sacred thread. At each of these times special prayers and important ceremonies are required.
The ninth is Vyákaraṇa, the science of grammer and linguistic
analysis, upon which are based the rules for the composition of letters.
Firstly, they reckon fifty-two letters under three kinds. Fourteen
are vowels (Svara) which are both letters and diacritical accents, and can
be pronounced without extraneous adjunct: These are, a
(
Such is the exposition of the Sanskrit alphabet as far as I have been able to transcribe it. Some points which it has been beyond my power adequately to explain I have but alluded to. The last five letters are employed with vowels and consonants alike, and each consonant is capable of being vocalized with the fourteen vowels. At the present day the fourteen vowels (svara) are called mátra2 and two being commonly omitted,3 twelve only are employed. Each written letter is separate and unconnected with the next. Letters are of four kinds. If without a moveable vowel a letter is called (vyáṅnjana). If it be a simple short vowel or if it add one mátra to a quiescent long vowel, it is called hrasva.4 Twice the prosodial time of a short vowel is called dírgha, and if longer than two (i. e. three mátras) it is called pluta or prolated.
Eight modes of utterance are reckoned, viz., from the middle of the chest: the throat: the root of the tongue: between the teeth: the nose: the palate: the lip: and the crown of the head. There is considerable diversity of opinion in all that they discuss but I have chosen the most generally accepted view. Before the writer had gained any acquaintance with this language, he considered the grammatical structure of Arabic to be without a rival, but he is now more fully aware of the immense labours of Hindu philologists, and the powerful regulative influence of their system.
The tenth science is Nirukta, (etymology), a detailed commentary of Vedic texts.5
The eleventh Jyotisha1 is on astronomy and its wonders.
The twelfth Chandas2 is on metre and the classes of verse.
The last six are called Angas,3 that is to say that a knowledge of these six is necessary to the comprehension of the Vedas.
The thirteenth is the Mímáṃsá of which the three kinds have been already mentioned.
The fourteenth is the Nyáya which has been summarily treated among the sciences.
The fifteenth is the A´yur-veda, the science of anatomy, hygiene, nosology and therapeutics. It is taken from the first Veda.4
The sixteenth is Dhanur-veda, the science of archery and of the use of various other weapons, taken from the second Veda.1
The seventeenth is Gíndharva-veda, the science of music, vocal, instrumental and practical, taken from the third or Sáma-veda.
The eighteenth is Artha-śástra, treating of the acquisition of wealth and its profitable employment.2 These four are termed subordinate or Upa-vedas.
The arts and sciences cultivated throughout the extent of Hindustan are too numerous to mention, but somewhat of them shall be briefly reviewed as an acceptable offering to the curious, in the hope that it may prove interesting as well as an incentive to inquiry.
Or the ripening of actions.3 This is a system of knowledge of an amazing and extraordinary character, in which the learned of Hindustan concur without dissentient opinion. It reveals the particular class of actions performed in a former birth which have occasioned the events that befall men in this present life, and prescribes the special expiation of each sin, one by one. It is of four kinds.
THE FIRST KIND discloses the particular action which has brought a man into existence in one of the five classes into which mankind is divided, and the action which occasions the assumption of a male or female form. A Kshatriya who lives continently, will, in his next birth, be born a Bráhman. A Vaiśya who hazards his transient life to protect a Bráhman, will become a Kshatriya. A ´Súdra who lends money without interest and does not defile his tongue by demanding repayment, will be born a Vaiṣya. A Mlechchha who serves a Bráhman and eats food from his house till his death, will become a ´Súdra. A Bráhman who undertakes the profession of a Kshatriya will become a Kshatriya, and thus a Kshatriya will become a Vaiśya, and a Vaiśya a ´Súdra, and a ´Súdra a Mlechchha. Whosoever accepts in alms a Kṛishṇájina1 or skin of the black antelope, or the bed on which a man has died, or a buffalo, or receives an alms in the shrine of Kurukshetra, will, in the next birth, from a man become a woman. Any woman or Mlechchha, who in the temple of Badari-Náráyaṇa2 sees the form of Náráyaṇa, and worships him with certain incantations, will in the next birth, if a woman, become a man, and if a Mlechchha, a Bráhman. This shrine is in the hills north of Hardwár. They say that for any one who has not an accurately defined caste, the horoscope of the result of any particular action is taken, and the place of Mars is observed. Whatever may be its position, the dominus domûs shows the caste of the inquirer, and the dominant of the seventh house of Mars shows the caste of the inquirer in his former birth. If Venus and Jupiter, his caste is Bráhman: if the sun and Mars, a Kshatriya: if the moon, a Vaiśya: if Saturn, a ´Súdra: if the head and tail of the Dragon, a Mlechchha.3
THE SECOND KIND shows the strange effects of actions on health of body and in the production of manifold diseases. Physicians attribute these to constitution, but this science to the results of former conduct. Hindu philosophers class diseases under three heads:—(1). Those that can be cured by medicinal treatment; (2). Those that are removable by observing the following courses of procedure; (3). Those that require the application of both. To diagnose each of these, certain symptoms are recognised which are classed under three states, viz., (1). actions deliberately committed in a state of wakefulness; (2). such as are unconsciously done in that condition;1 (3). and those that are effected during sleep. In the first, the sickness is incapable of remedy; in the second a remedy can be applied; in the third case, medicinal treatment to some extent restores health, but there is liability to relapse. Disorders of the heart, they consider, as originating in intention, and those of the body from inadvertency and error. Volumes have been written on this subject and the advice of physicians disregarded as unprofitable. Some of these causes of sickness are here set down for purposes of illustration.
HEADACHE is caused by former violent language used to father or mother. The remedy is to make the images of Kaśyapa2 and Aditi of two tolahs of gold and give them to the poor. The first of these two is regarded as the father of the Devatás, and the latter as the mother.
MADNESS is the punishment of disobedience to father and mother. The cure is to perform the Chándráyaṇa,3 which is to eat one mouthful on the first day, and to increase the food daily by the same quantity for one month, and then to decrease in the same measure till one mouthful is again reached, and to make two images as above of two tolahs of gold and bestow them in alms with one cow.
EPILEPSY results from having administered poison to another at the command of a superior. The cure consists of these two images, a cow, a piece of land and thirty-two sers of sesame-seed, with a repetition of some incantations in the name of Mahádeva.
PAIN IN THE EYES arises from having looked upon another's wife. The cure is Chándráyaṇa.
BLINDNESS is the punishment of a matricide which is followed by many years of suffering in hell. The cure is Prájápatya,1 which is of five kinds:—(1). Bestowing a cow in charity; (2). Or one tolah of gold; (3). Or feeding twelve Bráhmans; (4). Or throwing into the fire ten thousand times a mixture of sesame-seed, butter, honey and sugar; (4). Or walking a yojana, bare foot to a shrine. Let one or several of these be done in charity thirty times. Or let him make a boat of four tolahs of gold, the mast of silver, and six paddles of copper. Or, if it be a punishment of disobedience to father and mother, the cure is, as already described, the images of Kaśyapa and Aditi. These should not be of less than two tolahs.
DUMBNESS is the consequence of killing a sister. The cure is to bestow in charity a cow made of four tolahs of gold, its horns being of two tolahs of silver, its hump of two or three máshas of copper with a brass vessel for milk, and for seven days he should eat a mixture of curds, butter, urine and cowdung.
COLIC results from having eaten with an impious person or a liar. The cure is to fast for three days, and to give twelve tolahs of silver in charity.
STONE IN THE BLADDER2 is the punishment of incest with a step-mother. The cure is Madhu-dhenu (honey-milch cow). Let it be supposed that a milch-cow of honey is formed thus:—Fourteen vessels full of honey, each of which shall contain a man and a quarter, must be placed with one tolah of gold in front to represent the mouth; four sers of sugarcandy must represent her tongue; thirty-two sers of fruit, her teeth; pearls for the two eyes; and two sticks of lignum aloes for her horns; two plantains stand for her two ears; and barley-flour for her teats, with three sticks of sugar-cane for each leg. A white woollen cloth is thrown over the vessels to represent her hide, and Dába,1 which is a particular kind of grass, is strewn above it. The hoofs are to be of silver, the hump of a ser and a quarter of copper: the tail of silk, thirty fingers in length, with skeins2 of silk eleven fingers long hanging therefrom. Two pieces of red cloth must be thrown over her neck, and seven heaps of grain, each of two sers weight, must be made, and a brass vessel placed in front, and another vessel full of honey set near to represent her calf, and a copper3 vessel filled with sesame-seed. Next, certain incantations are made, and prayers are said, and alms given.
LAMENESS is the result of having kicked a Bráhman. The cure is to bestow in charity a horse made of a tolah of gold, and to feed one hundred and eight Bráhmans.
FEVER arises from killing an innocent Kshatriya. The cure: thirteen Bráhmans should read incantations in the name of Mahádeva one hundred times, and sprinkle water over his image.
CONSUMPTION is the punishment of killing a Bráhman. A lotus flower of four tolahs weight of gold should be made, and the ceremony of the Homa4 performed and alms given to righteous Bráhmans.
TUMOUR is caused by killing a wife without fault on her part. The cure is to spread a black antelope-skin (Kṛishṇájina) and place thereon a heap of sesame-seed and a hundred tolahs or more of gold, and read incantations and perform the Homa oblation. But the acceptance of such an offering is considered blameable.
ASTHMA results from having accepted of this oblation, or of one of the sixteen great offerings, or of an alms at Kurukshetra. The cure is to take a buffalo of iron, with hoofs and horns of lead, and to make a sectarial mark of stone on its forehead, garland it with flowers of the Kaṇer (Nerium odorum), and place upon it a black blanket and four tolahs of gold, and three man and a half of pulse (Másh, Phaseolus mungo). The performer must have a sectarial mark drawn upon his forehead with the finger. The accepter of this charity is not well regarded.
DYSENTERY is the punishment for robbing a house. The cure is to give in alms a house and its necessary furniture, and seven kinds of grain, thirty-two sers of each kind, a handmill, a pestle and mortar, a repository for drinking water, a kitchen-hearth, a broom, a cow, and money according to means.
THE THIRD KIND indicates the class of actions which have caused sterility and names suitable remedies.
A WOMAN whose husband dies before her, was in a former birth of a great family and followed a stranger and on his death consigned herself to the flames. The cure is self-martyrdom by austerities, or suicide by throwing herself into snow.
A WOMAN who does not menstruate, in a former existence while in her courses, roughly drove away the children of her neighbours who had come as usual to play at her house. The cure is to fill an earthen vessel with water from a hundred wells, and to throw therein a betel-nut and one másha of gold, anoint it with perfumes and give it to a Bráhman. She should also give five, seven, nine or eleven kinds of fruit to children to eat.
STERILITY1 is occasioned by a man or woman in a former birth having sold the children of other people, or the young of an oviparous animal, or reproached others for barrenness. Cure: the man and woman should enter the water at the meeting of two streams, wrapped in a single sheet, and bathe, and reciting certain incantations, pray to Mahádeva and give one mohur each to eleven Bráhmans, and a cow in alms on certain conditions, and make two images of Kaśyapa and Aditi of two tolahs of gold each, and making an image of Vishṇu in his dwarf incarnation (Vámana), bestow it in charity. And they should also fill eight winnowing-baskets with seven kinds of grain, and lay upon it a cloth and cocoanuts and various kinds of fruit, with flowers of saffron, and sandal-wood, and give each of these to a virtuous woman, and hear the recital of the Harivanśa,2 which is the conclusion of the Mahábhárata.
A WOMAN whose son dies shortly after his birth is thus punished for
having in a former birth followed a common practice in Hindustan of exposing
any child to die that is born when the moon is in the lunar station
called Múla (
A WOMAN who gives birth to only daughters is thus punished for having contemptuously regarded her husband from pride. The cure is to plate the horns of a white cow with four tolahs of gold and burnish its hoofs with four tolahs of silver, and make a hump of one ser and a quarter of copper and a vessel of two sers and a half of brass, and bestow this in charity. One hundred Bráhmans should also be fed and she should fashion a figure of the deity of ten máshas and two surkhs1 of gold, and reciting incantations, give alms and feed fifty Bráhmans.
A WOMAN who has had but one son, is punished for having taken away a calf from its dam. Cure: let her giveaway a fine milch-cow with ten tolahs of gold.
A WOMAN who has given birth to a son that dies and to a daughter that lives, has, in her former existence, taken animal life. Some say that she had killed goats.2 The cure is the fast of the Chándráyaṇa, a cow given in charity and the feeding of twelve Bráhmans.
A WOMAN who has continued in a state of pregnancy for sixteen years, has in a former birth been burnt when pregnant; the cure is an alms of Hiraṇya-garbha.3
BEING A MAID-SERVANT is the punishment for having in a former existence, from ignorance, had criminal intimacy with the husband of another and been burnt for his sake. The cure is, if she be in the house of a ´Súdra, to convey her to the house of a Vaiśya, and thus by gradation of caste to a Bráhman's, where she should remain in service till her death.
In order to discover whether these punishments are for the deeds of the man or the woman, they should both take the horoscopes of the results of particular actions. If in the horoscope, either the fifth or eleventh (mansion), shows the ascendens to be the Sun, Mars, or Saturn or the head or tail of the Dragon (ascending or descending node), and these affect the character of the woman (as based on the three modes of goodness, passion and darkness) which is considered under the influence of Saturn, the punishment is reckoned to be that of the woman, otherwise it appertains to the man. If in both mansions, the results apply to both.1
THE FOURTH KIND treats of riches and poverty, and the like. Whoever distributes alms at auspicious times, as during eclipses of the moon and sun, will become rich and bountiful (in his next existence). Whoso at these times, visits any place of pilgrimage, especially Ilahábás (Allahabad), and there dies, will possess great wealth, but will be avaricious and of a surly disposition. Whosoever when hungry and with food before him, hears the supplication of a poor man and bestows it all upon him, will be rich and liberal. But whosoever has been deprived of these three opportunities, will be empty-handed and poor in his present life. The cure is to fulfil scrupulously the duties of his state to whichsoever of the five classes he belongs, and also at Kurukshetra, in times of eclipse of the moon and sun, to bury in the ground a piece of gold, if it be but one másha, as an oblation.
Works have been written on each of these four kinds, detailing the causes, symptoms, and remedies of these actions. I have but adduced a little as an exemplar of much by way of illusration.
Is the extraordinary science of predicting events by observing the manner in which breath issues from the nostrils. The expiration of breath from the nostrils is in three ways. The first is when it comes principally from the left nostril, and this they ascribe to the influence of the moon. It is then called Iḍá (vital spirit), or Chandra-náḍi.1 The second is chiefly from the right nostril, and is called Pingala (sun, or fire) and Súrya-náḍi. The third is when the breath issues from the nostrils equally, which is styled Sushumná and also Sambhú-náḍi. This is attributed to the influence of Mahádeva.
Experts in this science distinguish the excess or even breathings by placing the thumb beneath the nostril. Two and a half ghaṛis is the time usually allotted to the two former kinds. The third occupies the time taken to pronounce a long vowel (guru), that is, a prolated vowel, as in má, thirty-six times. From the first tithi called pariwá2 to the third tithi, the order of breathing is the Chandra-náḍi, followed by the Súryanáḍi for the same period, and, so on, alternately, to the end of the month. Some authorities regulate the order by weeks, allotting Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday to the Súrya-náḍi, and Monday, Wednesday and Friday to the Chandra-náḍi: others, according to the sun's course through the Zodiacal signs, beginning with Aries for the Súrya-náḍi breathings, Taurus for Chandra-náḍi, and so alternately through the signs to the close of the year. Others again take the retardation of the moon in the Zodiacal signs in the same manner. All are however agreed that irregularity in the prescribed order is productive of temporal misfortune. If the intermission continue for two or three days, quarrels will ensue; if for ten days, a misfortune will befall the wife; if for fifteen days, a severe illness will disturb the happiness of the house. Should it last for a month, the brother will die. If the Súrya-náḍi breathings are in excess for one day and night, the man will die after the expiration of a year. If this anomaly continues for two and three days at a time, he will live a year for every day after the close of the year, according to the number of days. But if it continue for one month, he will die in a month. If the excess of the Chandra-náḍi be a day and night, the man will fall ill after the expiration of the year, and in the same way, according to the number of days, after the close of the year, his sickness will continue. If the irregularity last for one month continuously, he will be ruined in estate. If the excess of Sushumná continues for ten days, the man will die at the entry of the sun into Aries. If Chandra-náḍi last this period, perturbation of mind and sickness will ensue. If Chandra-náḍi continues in operation throughout sixteen days after the entry of the Sun into Aries, symptoms of sickness will supervene. When the Sun is in Scorpio, if Chandra-náḍi continues in operation for two or five days, the man will die in eighteen years, but if the Sun be in Virgo, in fifteen years. All are agreed that if at sun-rise, either Súrya-náḍi or Chandra-náḍi be operative, and the reverse of either at its setting, good fortune will result, otherwise a calamity will ensue, and if the Chandra-náḍi breathing be reversed in four ghaṛis, it is a sign of the occurrence of fortunate events.
According to the varied conditions of hours, days, Zodiacal signs, planetary movements, and manner of breathing in the three ways, divers events attended with joy or sorrow and other circumstances may be predicted. The Súrya-náḍi and Chandra-náḍi are each five-fold, and each division is named after one of the five elements. In two ghaṛis and a half, twenty pals are allotted to air; thirty pals to fire; forty pals to water; fifty pals to earth; and ten to ether.1 Some however give five pals to ether, ten to air, fifteen to fire, twenty to water, and twenty-five to earth, which are altogether equal to a ghaṛi and a quarter. When this revolution is completed, the recurring series begins with earth, followed by water, fire, air and ether. Some suppose one ghaṛi to be allotted severally to the elements of earth, water, fire, air and ether, and each element is distinguished by the manner of the breathing. If it rise upwards, it appertains to the element of fire; if laterally and not beyond the measure of four fingers' breadth, to that of air; if it descend, to that of water, its motion being sensible at a distance of twelve fingers. If the impulse be on a level with the nostril, neither upwards nor downwards, nor high nor low, and extending to a distance of eight fingers, it belongs to ether.
In what relates to the particular conditions affecting human actions, this science also furnishes information. Repose betokens the elemental influence of earth; love of sensual pleasures and interior coldness signifies that of water; anger and the conditions that dispose the good inclinations of men to evil are the result of the fiery influence; and that of ether produces states of divine contemplation, and the emptying of the interior soul of extraneous affections.
They also erect a gnomon on a level surface of ground, and take the extent of its shadow according to determinate finger-measures, counting the length of one finger for Sunday, two for Monday, and so on, up to seven fingers for Saturday. To this they add twelve more and divide the whole into five parts. If no digit-index is left, it is ascribed to ether; if one, to air; if two, to fire; if three, to water; and if four, to earth.
Another practice is to insert the two thumbs in the orifices of the ears, and to close the mouth with the little and fourth fingers of each hand, while the middle fingers press each nostril, and the corners of the eyes are drawn down by the fore-fingers, and the glance is directed between the brows. A spherule then becomes visible. If it have a quadrangular shape, and as if liquescent, it appertains to the element of earth; if it be the shape of a half-moon, and incline to white and appear hard and cold, it is of water; if it be round, bright, hard and black, and variously spotted, it is thought to belong to the element of air; if triangular and luminous, to that of fire, and if no spherule be visible, it is the effect of ether.
Imparting instruction, donations, visiting religious teachers and guides, repairing to the presence of idols, entering a city or house, and other particulars of movement and change of place, and (according to one opinion), undertaking a journey into a foreign country (and in accordance with general custom), buying and selling, the antidotes to various poisons, the repelling of ominous stellar influences, conditions of friendship, culling medicinal plants and herbs in the woods, operations in alchemy, works relating to Yoga and other duties of the same gracious character, are believed to be most salutary during the Chandra-náḍi period; while entering the presence of kings, and undertaking war are best during the Súrya-náḍi. In the Chandra-náḍi times, in battle, the enemy should be engaged from the left; during the Súrya-náḍi, from the right. Bodily safety is generally ascribed as dependent on the particular side of the breathing. The conquest of a province and (according to one opinion) travelling in one's own country, eating, sexual intercourse, bathing, imprisonment, withdrawing from any work, obstructing another's affections, and the like inauspicious actions, are suitable to the Súrya-náḍi. In the Sushumná period, no work is undertaken.
All works of an auspicious nature are undertaken under the influence of the elements of water and earth, while those that are to be durable are chosen with reference to the elements of fire and air. No good work is ascribable to ether. When proceeding to any place, that foot is first lifted on whichever side the breathing is greatest, and if a person meets a superior to whom reverence is due, or from whom he expects to receive a favour, he takes care in his movements to keep that personage on the side on which he himself breathes;1 but an evil-disposed person, or a creditor, and the like, should be kept on the non-respiratory side. They also say that upper and forward situations are dominated by Chandra-náḍi, and those inferior and behind, by Súrya-náḍi, and in both cases the parties must continue in their several positions till the action is concluded.
Should any one inquire whether a child about to be born, will be a boy or a girl, the person questioned must ascertain from which of his own nostrils the breathing is greater. If the questioner be on that side, he will gladden him with the news of a son; if not, he will reply that it will be a girl. If he breathes equally through both nostrils, there will be twins. If it should so happen that during the inquiry, he should breathe through one nostril more than another, he will predict the extinction of that life. Another opinion is that if the questioner stand on the Chandra-náḍi side, it will be a girl; if on the Súrya-náḍi, a boy, and if the breathing be of the kind Sushumná, an hermaphrodite. Some say that the times referrible to the elements of earth and water, indicate a boy, and those of fire and air, a girl, and ether implies death. If the inquiries relate to matters concerning study, tuition, marriage, menial service or its employment, attendance on the great, and buying and selling, the element of water prognosticates speedy success; that of earth, more tardy; of air, the success will be small; of fire, gain followed by loss. Ether shows no benefit. If the inquiry be regarding rain, the elements of earth and water indicate that rain will fall, but in the latter there is greater evidence of a plentiful supply to the crops. The element of air predicts clouds without rain; and fire, gentle showers. Regarding questions as to crops, water and earth show that they will yield the revenue, and in the latter case a full harvest; air indicates a moderate crop, and fire that it will be burnt up. No evidence of result is shown by ether. Should the inquiry be relative to sickness, and if the period be Chandra-náḍi, and the questioner be on the Súrya-náḍi side, or vice versa, the sick person will die, but if he stand on the Chandra-náḍi side, the patient will quickly recover. Should the question be made on the Súryanáḍi side, the illness will be protracted, but recovery will follow. Others look to the manner of the breathing. If the question be put during an inspiration which is called living breath, it is a sign of life; but if during an expiration, which is styled lifeless breath, the patient will die; in all inquiries this rule is regarded. A man bitten by a snake or under demoniacal possession, or mauled by a hyæna1 is accounted among sick persons.
Should the question be regarding invasion by a foreign force: if the period be Chandra-náḍi, and the questioner stand on that side, it indicates an affirmative; if he stand on the Súrya-náḍi side, a negative. Others say that if the times appertain to the elements of earth and water, no invasion will occur, but those of fire and air denote an advance. Ether gives no response. If the inquiries be concerning war and peace, Chandra-náḍi implies the latter, and Súrya-náḍi the former. Some maintain that the earth-periods predict a severe engagement and that many will be wounded, while fire, air and ether point to losses on both sides. Water signifies a peace. If the question relate to the issue between the querist and his enemy, earth implies war, and that many will fall; fire predicts victory to the questioner; air defeat, and ether his death in the engagement; water indicates a coming peace. If information be sought regarding the result of hostilities between defenders of a country and foreign troops, Chandra-náḍi denotes victory to the former, and Súrya-náḍi to the latter. Some are of opinion that if the questioner stand on the left, and the period be Chandra-náḍi, if the letters of the name of the questioner be even, he will be successful: if he stand on the right, and it be Súrya-náḍi, and the number of the letters be odd, victory will rest with the latter. If both names have an equal number of letters, and the questioner be on the side of the breathing nostril, the former will have the advantage; if on the side of the non-breathing nostril, the latter.
If information is asked, regarding a person absent, the water-periods indicate his speedy arrival; earth, that he is settled where he is; air, that he has emigrated to another country, and fire implies his death. Ether reveals nothing. If the thoughts of the questioner refer to any subject of the animal, vegetable and mineral kingdoms, earth-periods imply the vegetable; water and air, the animal, and fire, the inorganic and mineral; the ether-periods point to the absence of these thoughts from the mind of the questioner.
Such is this strange account, of which let the foregoing suffice:—
is a doctrinal treatise on incantations relative to things that will produce advantage or repel hurt, increase knowledge and remedy diseases, augment wealth, destroy enemies, cement friendship, secure conquest and advance good government, and the like.
or augury,1 is the extraordinary art of predicting events from the motions of birds. Their song, their silence, their movements and repose, and indications of pleasure and sadness, and similar signs, discover the present and the future. There are many in this country who are skilled in this important science. One day, in a royal preserve, two mainás1 sat perched side by side chirping low together. His Majesty deigned to inquire the subject of their converse from an expert in this divination, who replied that were he to reveal their confidence to his Majesty, he would not be believed. The male desired to pair while the female excused herself. It was not improbable that if the nest were searched stains of blood would be found. On examination being made, his words were found to be true. The sooth-sayers of Hindustan foretell future events chiefly by means of five methods, the stars, breathing from the nostrils, augury, incantations, and kevala2, which is divination by the throwing of dice, and it comprises various other kinds of prognostication.
or Palmistry, predicts events from observation of the character of the members of the body and their movements, and from lines and marks, and the results are generally accurate.
is a science treating of snakes, scorpions, and other venomous reptiles, the effects of whose injuries it averts. By reciting incantations and repeating the genealogical descent (of the person affected) and praising his ancestry, the animal is made to appear. An extraordinary circumstance is the following:—They take an old snake of a particular kind, and after certain incantations they make it bite a Bráhman. When the poison works, the man becomes senseless, in which state he answers any questions put to him, and these prove correct. The Hindu sages believe that during the Kali cycle, nothing can be more true than these revelations of the unknown, and several works containing these answers are still extant.
is the art of sorcery, of magical spells, and sleight of hand. The wonders performed by these means are beyond the power of expression.
or Alchemy, is the science of the fusing of mercury (rasa), gold, silver, copper, and the like. It is by this art that the elixir, or philosopher's stone, is produced.
is the art of testing jewels and precious stones of various kinds, and treats of their production, properties, value, and kindred subjects.
treats of the generation of the human race.
or rhetorical composition, is a science comprising various kinds of knowledge. It sets forth the shades of signification in words, appropriateness of expression, and solecisms of language. They hold the Supreme Being to be its author. The meaning underlying a word is said to be four-fold:—(1). ´Sakti (power of a word), is denotation and its conventional relation to the thing designated. (2). Lakshaná (indication),1 communicates the applied meaning desired. (3). Gauṇa, (qualitative), illustrates figuratively the thing compared. (4). Vyanjañá (suggestion), is to say one thing and mean another which has no apparent application. As, for example, a woman sent her maid-servant with a message to call her husband who, when she entered his private apartment, used criminal familiarity with her and sent an excuse by her for his not returning. When she took back the message, from the pallor of her face and the obliteration of her marks of sandal-wood and collyrium, and of the colour (from her lips), the wife understood what had really occurred. Though much pained, she showed no signs of it in her speech, but said,—‘You are speaking an untruth; you never went to fetch him, but you went to the banks of the stream and bathed, for the collyrium is no longer round your eyes nor the sandal-wood unguent on your person.” By this delicate irony she discovered her knowledge of what had taken place, and her own distress of mind.1
Some consider the figurative sense (gauṇa), to belong to the second head, and they describe with peculiar force and elaborate detail all that makes for literary ornament and grace of expression. It is held to be the highest form of dramatic poetry, of rhetorical art, and metrical composition.2 This science also comprises the Navarasa,3 or the nine sentiments, which inspire universal interest. The first is ´Sṛingára-rasa (the erotic passion), that is, the mutual affection of men and women, and all that relates to their union and separation. Secondly, Hásya-rasa, mirth of various kinds. This is produced, they say, by variations in person, speech, action and dress. It is three-fold:—1. Smita, (smile), a slight alteration in the cheek, eye and lip. (2). Vihasita (gentle laugh), in which the mouth is a little open. (3). Apahasita, laughter accompanied by sound of the voice.4 Thirdly, Karuṇa-rasa, pity or regret, as at the loss of a friend or property. Fourthly, Raudra, anger. Fifthly, Víra (heroism), the admiration produced by acts of munificence, clemency and valour. Sixthly Bhayánaka, terror. Seventhly, Bíbhatsa, aversion. Eighthly, Adbhuta, wonder, as at the sight of any (extraordinary) object. Ninthly, Sánta (quietism), the tranquillity that comes of knowledge and the indifference which regards friend and foe as alike. Of these they make various sub-divisions and illustrate them by delightful examples.1
The relations between the sexes are also considered in this branch of knowledge, and the passion of love amply discussed. In Irán and Ṭúrán, this affection chiefly subsists between men; in Hindustan and Ḥijáz, between men and women. Devotion to the female sex is the characteristic of the Arab, while the native of India includes both sexes alike in his regard.
The Hindus term a heroine (in dramatic poetry), náyika, and three kinds are named. (1). Svíyá, (own wife), a virtuous woman devoted to her husband: from modesty she looks neither to the right hand nor to the left, but only from the corner of her eyes so that her glance is rarely seen: her laugh does not pass beyond her lips and her teeth are not disclosed: she speaks seldom and never loudly: she rarely loses her temper, and if she be provoked to anger, it is restrained within her heart and does not appear in her eyes or manner. (2). Parakíyá, (belonging to another), is one who clandestinely carries on an intrigue with other than her husband. If a married woman she is called Prauḍha; a maiden, Kanyaká. Other classifications of this kind are carried to an indefinite extent.2 Sámányá (courtesan), is the property of none, and is concerned only in making money.
Svíyá is classed under three heads:—(1). Mugdhá, (artless), one who from her childish age and inexperience goes3 out-of-doors, and in whom youth begins to grow headstrong, and who may be to some extent conscious of her beauty or otherwise, and shrinks from the embraces of her husband. When she retires to sleep, she regards him furtively and pretends to slumber lest he should enter into conversation but from fear of him sleeps not. The age of such a one ranges from eight to twelve and at times to thirteen. (2). Madhyá (middling or adolescent) is one in whom modesty and love for her husband are combined in an equal degree. She may speak in anger but never thus to her husband. Her age does not exceed thirty-two. (3). Pragalbhá (bold or mature) makes her love and address pleasing to her husband and captivates him by her experienced arts. The age of this kind extends to fifty-two years.
The last two are further subdivided into three classes. (1). Dhírá (constant). If her husband pay attention to another woman, though fired by jealousy, she becomes more assiduous in her devotion and service and by this means makes him ashamed of his conduct. (2). Adhírá (capricious). Such a one takes no notice of his infidelity and holds her peace, but she will address him cheerfully so as to cover him with confusion and say:— “It is strange that while you are wakeful, my eyes glance love and while you are drunk with wine, my heart is in agitation.” (3). Dhírá Adhírá, is one who unites both these dispositions and sighs to show that she understands. Some add a conversation after the manner above indicated.1
Svíyá is also of two kinds. (1). Jyeshṭhá (pre-eminent, eldest), is one who is preferred by her husband above all women. (2). Kanisṭhá (inferior, youngest) is one for whom her husband's affection is less strong.
Parakíyá is of five kinds. (1). Guptá (guarded) covers her conduct, and skilfully conceals her past indiscretions and her future designs, feigning plausible excuses. If for instance she has been scratched by her lover's nail, she will say “I cannot sleep in this room:—a cat chases a mouse, and in the scramble gives me this scratch.” (2). Vidagdhá (adroit or artful). By her persuasive speech she acquires influence and her winning manners secure it. (3). Lakshitá (notorious), shows her affection openly and without fear. (4). Kulaṭá (unchaste), has many lovers and retains the affections of each without pecuniary considerations. (5). Anuśayáná (regretting), is one who from timidity does not keep her assignation and is fearful lest her lover come and not find her.
They also class women under eight heads:—(1). Proshita-bhartṛiká is one whose husband is abroad, and she is distressed at his absence from her, or he is on the point of setting out and she is disquieted by her fears. Other opinions subdivide this, making nine classes. (2). Khaṇḍitá is one who is disconsolate at being betrayed by her husband or lover. (3). Kalahántaritá is one who has quarrelled with her lover and is penitent and wishes to appease him. (4). Vipra-labdhá goes to an assignation but is disappointed at not finding her lover. (5). Utká1 is disconsolate at her lover's not coming, and seeks the cause thereof. (6). Vásakasajjá is joyful at the coming of her lover, and is dressed in her ornaments to receive him. (7). Svádhína-patiká, (independent—having her own way), is a woman whose lover is obedient to her wishes. (8). Abhisáriká, is one who invites her lover, or herself goes to him.
Another classification of women is of three kinds:—(1). Uttamá (best), is one who is in love with her husband though he show her no affection. (2). Adhamá (worst), opposite of the above. (3). Madhyamá (intermediate), is sometimes united in harmony and affection with her husband and at times is unfriendly and estranged.
A further division is four-fold:—(1). Padminí, is incomparable for her beauty and good disposition, and is tall of stature. Her limbs are perfectly proportioned; her voice soft, her speech gracious though reserved, and her breath fragrant as the rose. She is chaste and obedient to her husband. (2). Chitriṇí, is somewhat inferior to the former; is neither stout nor thin, has a slender waist and a full bust. (3). ´Sankhiní, is fat and short, constantly quarrelling with her husband and has a violent temper. (4). Hastiní, is repulsive in appearance and manners.
All these are treated at length, with the particular classes of men that are suited to each. Mána signifies indignation in a woman at misconduct on the part of her husband. It is of four kinds:—(1). Laghu, (trifling), when she gives herself airs at the least caress or endearment of her husband or lover. (2). Madhya (middling), is when she is estranged by some slight provocation. (3). Guru (weighty), when after much fond2 entreaty on his part, she lays aside her wayward humour. (4). Rasábhasa (simulated sentiment), is when she refuses reconciliation.
The lover or hero (in a drama) is called Náyaka. These also are
named suitably to the heroines, but are restricted to three:—(1). Pati
(lord or husband), chooses in wedlock only a Hindu woman. (2). Upapati,3
(
Each of these is subdivided into four kinds:—(1). Anukúla, (faithful), is attached to one woman only. (2). Dakshiṇa (impartial), pays his addresses to many, and adroitly secures the favours of all. (3). Dhṛishta, (cool or impudent), is one whom the heroine in her indignation repels while he caresses and flatters her the more. (4). ´Saṭha, (perfidious), by cunning and simulating affection wins her heart (though attached to another.)1
In the treatment of love-episodes, the greatest art is shown in the situations of the hero and heroine and the dramas abound with the most felicitous passages.
Sakhi is the term for the usual female confidante on whose faithful service the heroine relies. Her advice and devotion are of the greatest comfort. She jests and amuses her mistress and never fails her in the time of need. She arranges her ornaments and assists in tiring her. By her persuasive representations she removes the misunderstandings between husband and wife and effects a reconciliation. She is ever ready with her counsel and good offices, and is entrusted with messages. Such a female is called dúti; if a man, dúta. She is conversant with all the mysteries of union and separation and is an expert in matters connected with love and rivalry.
In this art the manners and bearing of the hero and the heroine2 are set-forth with much variety of exposition, and illustrated by delightful examples. The works on this subject should be consulted by those who are interested in its study.
is the art of singing, accompanied by music and dancing. The subject is treated in seven chapters (adhyáyas).
THE FIRST is Svarádhyáya, on musical tone which is of two kinds. (1). Anáhata, sound produced without cause (i. e., otherwise than by percussion). This is considered to be one and eternal. If a man close both orifices of his ears with his fingers, he will be conscious of a resonance, and this is signified by the above term. They believe this to proceed from Brahmá, and when the consciousness of it becomes habitual and it is heard without mediate aid, final liberation (mukti) is then attained. (2). A´hata, sound produced by a cause, which, like speech, is accounted a quality of air and is produced by percussion and protrusion. They say that in each of the three locations of the abdomen, the throat, and the head, twenty-two fibres or chords have been divinely created. The primary movement of air is from the navel, and the volume of sound produced depends upon the strength or softness of the initial force exerted.1
They consider that the fifth, sixth, eighteenth and nineteenth chords are mute and the remaining eighteen are classed under the seven primary notes in the following order:—
(1). Shaḍja,1 is taken from the note of the peacock (and extends to the fourth chord). (2). Ṛishabha, is taken from the note of the Papíha (Coccystes Melanoleucos), and beginning after the fourth chord (omitting the fifth and sixth), extends from the seventh to the tenth. (3). Gándhára, is from the bleating of a he-goat and its compass extends from the ninth to the thirteenth. (4). Madhyama, resembles the cry of the Coolen Crane2 (Ardea Sibirica), and its compass is from the thirteenth to the sixteenth. (5). Paṇchama, is taken from the note of the Ko'il (Cuculus Indicus), and is attuned on the seventeenth. (6). Dhaivata, is like the croak of the frog, and its compass extends from the twentieth3 to the twenty-second. (7). Nisháda is taken from the sound of the elephant1 and its compass is from the twenty-second to the third of the next series (of twenty-two). Each heptachord occurs successively in each series, and in the third, Nisháda, cannot, of course, go beyond the twenty-second chord.
A system of intervals in which the whole seven notes of the gamut are employed, is termed Sampúrṇa. If there be only six, the fundamental must be one of them, and it is styled Sháḍava; if five, Auḍava, the fundamental being of necessity one of them. None has fewer than these, but the tána which is a separate intonation may consist of two.2
THE SECOND is Rága-vivekádhyáya, on divers musical compositions and their variations.3
Their origin is ascribed to Mahádeva and (his wife) Párvati. The first-mentioned had five mouths,1 from each of which issued a melody in the following order:—
(1). ´Srí-rága. (2). Vasanta. (3). Bhairava. (4). Pañchama. (5). Megah. (6). Nata-Naráyaṇa was produced by Párvati. Each of these six modes is called in Sanskrit Rága, and they are reckoned the primary orders of sounds. Each of them has numerous variations.
The ´Srí-rága has the whole seven notes (sampúrna) of the gamut. In this, Rishabha has a compass to the eighth chord, Gándhára to the tenth, Madhyama to the thirteenth, and Dhaivata to the twenty-first: Nisháda is allotted but one. And in like manner other changes occur throughout all the modifications.
1. VARIATIONS OF ´SRÍ-RÁGA:—(1). Málaví. (2). Tirovaní.2 (3). Gaurí. (4). Kedárí. (5). Madhu-mádhaví. (6). Vihárí.
2. VARIATIONS OF VASANTA:—(1). Desí. (2). Devagirí. (3). Vairátí.1 (4). Toḍí. (5). Lálitá. (6). Hindólí.
3. VARIATIONS OF BHAIRAVA:—(1). Madhya-mádi2. (2). Bhairaví. (3). Bángah. (4). Varátaka.3 (5.) Sindaví.4 (6.) Punarjṅneya.5
4. VARIATIONS OF PA@~NCHAMA:—(1). Vibhása.6 (2). Bhúpáli. (3). Kánará.7 (4). Baḍhansiká. (5). Malaśri. (6). Padhamanjari.8
5. VARIATIONS OF MEGHA:—(1). Malár. (2). Sorathí. (3). A´sávarí.9 (4). Kaisukí.10 (5). Gándhárí. (6). Harsingárí.11
6. VARIATIONS OF NÁṬA NARÁYAṆA:—(1). Kámodí. (2). Kalyáṇ.12 (3). Ahírí.13 (4). ´Suddhanáṭa.14 (5). Sálak.15 (6). Naṭ-Hamíra.16
Some allow only five variations to each mode and numerous other differences occur. Others in place of Vasanta, Pañchama and Megha, substitute Málakauśika,17 Hindola and Dípaka, and make five instead of six variations to each, with a few other discrepancies of less importance. Others again, in place of the second, third, fourth and fifth modes, have ´Suddha-bhairava, Hindola, Deśakára and ´Suddha-náṭa.
Songs are of two kinds. The first is called Márga or the lofty style as chanted by the gods and great Ṛishis, which is in every country the same, and held in great reveration. The masters of this style are numerous in the Dekhan,18 and the six modes abovementioned with numerous variations of which the following are examples, are held by them to appertain to it.
(1). Surya-prakáśa. (2). Pañcha-táleśvara. (3). Sarvato-bhadra. (4). Chandra-prakáśa. (5). Rága-kadamba. (6). Jhúmara. (7). Svaravartaní.
The second kind is called Deśi or applicable to the special locality, like the singing of the Dhurpad in Agra, Gwalior, Bári and the adjacent country. When Mán Singh1 (Toṇwar) ruled as Rájá of Gwalior, with the assistance of Náyak Bakshú, Macchú, and Bhanú, who were the most distinguished musicians of their day, he introduced a popular style of melody which was approved even by the most refined taste. On his death, Bakshú and Machhú passed into the service of Sulṭán Maḥmúd of Gujarát where this new style came into universal favour.
The Dhurpad2 (Dhruva-pada) consists of four rhythmical lines without any definite prosodial length of words or syllables. It treats of the fascinations of love and its wondrous effects upon the heart. In the Dekhan these songs are expressed in their language by the term Chind, and consist of three or four lines, and are chiefly laudatory. In the Tilanga and Carnatic dialects they are called Dhruva, and their subject is erotic. Those of Bengal are called Bangula, and those of Jounpúr, Chuṭkala, while the songs of Dehli are called ḳaul and tarána. These last were introduced by Amír Khusrau, of Dehli, in concert with Ṣámit and Tatár, and by combining the several styles of Persia and India, form a delightful variety. The songs of Mathura are called Bishn-pad, (Vishṇu-pada) consisting of four, six and eight lines, sung in honour of Vishṇu. Those of Sind are styled Kámi and are amatory. Those in the dialect of Tirhút are called Lahchárí, and are the composition of Biddyá-pat, and in character highly erotic. In Lahor and the adjacent parts, they are called Chhand; those of Gujarát, Jakri.1 The war songs and heroic chants called Karkha, they term Sádara, and these consist also of four, six, and eight lines, and are sung in various dialects.
Besides these that have been named, there are numerous other modes, amongst which are the following:—
Sárang; Púrbí; Dhanáśrí; Rámkalí; Kuráí, (which His Majesty has styled Sughrái);2 Súha; Deśakála and Désákha.
THE THIRD is called Prakírṇádhyáya or a chapter of miscellaneous rules and treats of Alápa,3 which is of two kinds. (1). Rágálapa, the development of the rága, commonly termed (in Persian) adá and taṣarruf, and (2). Rúpálápa: which comprises the metrical setting of the words to the air and their vocal expression.
THE FOURTH, or Prabandhádhyáya, is on the art of composing a rhythmic measure (gíta)1 to vocal music. It consists of six members, viz. (1). Svara, (notes as sa, ṛi, &c., taken at their proper pitch). (2). Viruda, panegyric. (3). Pada, name of its object. (4). Tená, a cadence of notes on a symbolic standard, as tena, tená, and the modulation of the lines. (5). Páṭa, the continuous imitation of sounds (proceeding from percussion instruments) as tena, tená, máná, &c., from three letters to twenty, in a specific order as a supplementary guiding measure. (6). Tála, rhythm expressed by beat. If the whole six members be present, the composition (prabandha) is called mediní;2 if one less, it is termed ánandiní; if two less, dípaní; if three less, bhávaní, and if four less, tárávalí; but with only two it does not (commonly) occur.
These four adhyáyas treat of the various refinements of melody.
THE FIFTH is Táládhyáya, on the nature and quantity of the musical beats.
THE SIXTH is Vádyádhyáya, on the various musical instruments. These are of four kinds.
(1). Tata, stringed instruments. (2). Vitata, instruments over which skin is stretched. (3). Ghana, all that gives resonance by the concussion of two solid bodies. (4). ´Sushira, wind instruments.
Colebrooke suspects that this personage was altogether mythical. He is variously asserted to have been a son of Brahmá and incarnations of Vishṇu and of Agni. The latter fable may be accounted for by the signification of the word kapila which besides that of tawny, bears also the meaning of fire. He is mentioned in the Puráṇas as one of the great sages. Davies, in the preface to his exposition of the Sánkhya system, creits him with being a historical personage, and says that he was born in Northern India before the date of Gautama Buddha. The name of a city called Kapila-vastu, (the tawny site) mentioned in the Pali Dáthavanisa as having been built by the permission of the sage Kapila, seems to be authority for this belief, but it may be also rendered, as Prof. Wilson remarks (II. 346) “the substance of Kapila,” intimating the Sánkhya philosophy upon which the fundamental elements of Buddhism are evidently based. His life and times are however quite uncertain. Tradition makes him a recluse but he survives only in the system connected with his name. This, says Davies, remains only a philosophical theory, preserved only as an intellectual product understood and accepted by a small inner circle of free thinking men. “The name Sánkhyá is derived from the noun which signifies ‘number,’ and the precision of reckoning observed in the enumeration of its principles, is aid to be the origin of the term as applied to this philosophy. The derivative meaning of reasoning or judgment, which the word also implies, points to the application of this term to the exercise of judgment which is its characteristic, and this interpretation is supported by a passage of the Mahábhárata (xii. 11409–10) which runs: ‘They exercise judgment (Sánkhyá) discuss nature, and (other) twenty-four principles, and therefore are called Sánkhya.” v. Colebrooke, I, 241.
This scholar observes that the text of the Sánkhya philosophy from which the sect of Buddha seems to have borrowed its doctrines, is not the work of Kapila himself, though vulgarly ascribed to him; but it purports to be composed by I´śvarakṛishna, who is stated to have received the doctrine mediately from Kapila, through successive teachers, after its publication by Panchaśikha, who had been himself instructed by A´suri, the pupil of Kapila: I. 93. Max Mûller and Oldenberg do not acknowledge the debt of Buddhism to the Sánkhya philosophy, nor any definite similarity between them. Names as eminent and more numerous, Colebrooke, Wilson, Bournouf, Hodgson, Lassen, St. Hilaire, Weber, L. von Schroeder, Dr. Mitra are opposed to this denial, and lately Dr. Garbe in the preface to his translation of Aniruddha's Commentary on the Sánkhya Sútras, adds the force of his testimony to the stronger side, and adduces, under the authority of Prof. Ernst f Leumann, the Jaina legend as placing Kapila before the time of Buddha and Mahávíra. Dr. Banerjea ascribes precedence in date to the Buddhist doctrine.
↩That is, that the existent is produced from the existent only, as the Sánkhyas hold. Thus, cloth is not distinct from the threads as it abides in the latter. “As the limbs of a tortoise when retracted within its shell are concealed, and when they come forth are revealed, so the particular effects as cloth, &c., of a cause, as threads &c., when they come forth and are revealed, are said to be produced; and when they retire and are concealed, are said to be destroyed: but there is no such thing as the production of the non-existent, or the destruction of the existent.” Sarva Darśana Sangraha. Cowell, Gough, pp. 225–26, and Colebrooke, I. 266.
↩Perception, inference, and fit testimony.
↩It exists as pure inward light without any instrumentation by which it can become cognisant of the external world. This has been supplied, but it is foreign to the soul and as objective to it as any form of matter. Like Kant, the Sánkhyas hold that there is no knowledge of an external world save as represented by the action of our faculties to the soul, and they take as granted the objective reality of our sense-perceptions. The soul is different in kind from all material things, and will be finally severed from them by an eternal separation. It will then have no object and no function of thought, and will remain self-existent and isolated in a state of passive and eternal repose. v. Davies, pp. 18–20.
↩Identical with A´tman. It is multitudinous, individual, sensitive, eternal, unalterable, immaterial. Colebrooke, I. 256. In the Bhagavad Gíta, the Supreme Purusha is the male creative power in the person of Kṛishna identified with Brahma. XIII. 22. Davies' translation. From Nature (Prakṛiti), issues the great principle (Mahat, Intellect) and from this, consciousness or the Ego: from consciousness, the whole sixteen entities and from five of the sixteen, the five gross elements. Davies, p. 54. In its primal form, matter is eternal and self existing. From it all things emanate except soul which has an independent existence both a parte ante and a parte post, p. 17. The text has incorrectly begun a new paragraph with the word átman, which should terminate the paragraph preceding.
↩The theistical Sánkhya, as opposed to the system of Kapila, understands by Purusha, not individual soul alone, but likewise God (I´śvara) the ruler of the world. Colebrooke. I. 256.
↩ A variant has
That is, not the exaltation but the predominance of self in thought to the supreme conviction of the sole subjective personality of the thinker. v. Davies and Colebrooke.
↩Signifies belonging to or derived from Prajá-pati and is a patronymic of Vishṇu, Hiraṇya-garbha, and other deities. Prajápati or the lord of creatures, is an epithet in the Veda, applied to Savitṛi, Indra, Agni and others, and later to a separate god presiding over procreation, and identified in more recent hymns with the universe. It is also an epithet of the ten (according to some authorities, seven)lords of created beings first created by Brahmá. v. Monier Williams. Sansk. Dict.
↩Relating or consecrated to the Manes.
↩ An account of these various orders
will be found in the Vishṇu Puṛána.
They are familiar names in Hindu theology,
and all are emanations from Brahmá
under various states of his curiously
complex organisation. In a form composed
of the quality of foulness was
produced Hunger, from whom Anger was
born, and in darkness, Brahmá put forth
beings of hideous aspect and emaciate
with hunger. Such of them as exclaimed,
‘Oh preserve us,’ were called Rákshasas,
from
This should include minerals, the Sanskrit term signifying fixed things. Mánushya is transliterated in the text manishu.
↩According to the Vishṇu Puráṇa both the qualities of darkness and foulness predominated at this inauspicious birth. Its products were termed arváksrotas from the downward current of their nutriment.
↩From vikṛiti, a production or development, as derived mediately from the first principle Prakṛiti. I do not find these sects thus specifically named. The successive stages of creation are the nine so-called sargas (creations), viz., the Mahat, Bhúta, Aindreyaka, Maukhya, Tairyaksrotas, U´rddhasrotas, Arváksrotas, Anugraha, and Kaumara, or matter, the elements, the senses, the earth, animals, gods, men, goblins and Brahmá's sons. The three first are called Prákṛita or elementary, and the six last Vaikṛita or secondary, the elements being only made to assume Vikṛiti or a change of form. Wilson Essays, I. 148. The terms Prákṛita and Vaikṛita are translated by Wilson in the Vishṇu Puráṇa as primary and secondary (creation). Kapila acknowledges a being issuing from Nature, who is intelligence absolute, source of all individual intelligences and origin of other existence necessarily evolved and developed. Yet that being is finite, having a beginning and an end, dating from the development of the universe, to terminate with its consummation, but an infinite being, creator and guide of the universe, he positively denies. Passages that seem to countenance the existence of God are interpreted by Kapila to signify the liberated soul or a mythological deity or the sublime production of the mundane egg. v. Colebrooke, I, 264.
↩ I read
12,000 years of the gods or 4,320,000 mortals.
↩ The text is wrongly punctuated.
There should be full stop after
| Thus the | Kṛita Yuga | 4,800 | |
| Tretá ” | 3,600 | ||
| Dvápara ” | 2,400 | ||
| Kali ” | 1,200 | ||
| ——— | |||
| 12,000 | years of the gods. |
By multiplying each of the above by 360, a year of men being a day of the gods, the total is 4,320,000 for a Maháyuga or great age: this multiplied by 71 = 306,720,000. According to the Vishṇu Puráṇa there is a surplus which Wilson shows to be the number of years required to reconcile two computations of the Kalpa. The latter is equal to 1,000 great ages or 4,320,000 × 1,000= 4,320,000,000. But a day of Brahmá is also 71 times a Great Age, multiplied by 14: or 4,320,000 × 71 × 14 = 4294,080,000 or less than the preceding by 25,920,000 and it is to make up this deficiency that an addition is made to the computation by manvantras. See the V. P. p. 24. n. 6. Abul Fazl makes a Kalpa to consist of four Yugas only.
↩See p. 150.
↩See this translation of Sanskára at p. 135, note. The meaning is, that by attainment of perfect knowledge, virtue and the rest become causeless, but the soul continues awhile invested with its body, as the potter's wheel continues whirling from the effect of previous impulse. Vide: Sánkhya-Káriká, LXVII. Colebrooke, I, 278.
↩Depravity of the eleven organs, together with injuries of the intellect, are pronounced to be disability. The injuries of intellect are seventeen by inversion of acquiescence and perfectness. From defect of instruments there are twenty-eight distinctions of disability. Vide Colebrooke I, 277. translation of the Sánkhya Káriká.
↩See on this Dr. Richard Garbe's translation of Aniruddha's Commentary on the Sánkhya Sútras. These first four are termed by Dr. Garbe the subjective acquiescences, and are figuratively named by the commentator, water (ambhas), wave (salila), flood (ogha), rain (vṛishti), respectively. The next three, ‘crossing,’ ‘happy crossing’ and ‘most excellent crossing,’ pâra, supára, párapára, together with the last two ‘excellent water’ (anuttamámbhas) and ‘most excellent-water’ (uttamámbhas) belong to the five objective acquiescences. Dr. Garbe observes that all Sánkhya Commentaries have preserved these strange terms without explanation. They are probably metaphorical expressions representing the passage of the soul across the river of existence, and are gradations of acquiescence rising in intensity from partial, to more complete, and finally to absolute detachment. The rationale all of these acquiescences is given by the commentator.
↩Three kinds of prevention of pain which would make up the eight, have been for some reason omitted by Abul Fazl, and he has accounted for only fifty-five out of the sixty topics. The remainder are partly included in those mentioned, and may be seen in Colebrooke, and in Dr. Garbe's translation of Aniruddha's Commentary. In the latter, the three first perfections are called tára, sutára, and táratára, mystical terms of the kind descriptive of the three acquiescences, of which the true meanings are probably lost. The fifth perfection (dána), according to Aniruddha's catachrestical interpretation, is purification which means the clearing of discriminative knowledge, as the word dána is derived from the root dai to clear, but the root da has both the meanings given by Abul Fazl to dána, viz., liberality and instruction.
↩The accounts of this philosopher and grammarian are like those of the founders of the preceding systems, meagre and legendary. The period in which he flourished is disputed. Barth places him in the second century before Christ (Religions of India). Weber (Hist. of Indian Lit.) leaves it an open question whether he is to be identified with the author of the Mahábháshya, the great commentary on the grammar of Páṇini, which Dr. Rájendralála Mitra unhesitatingly ascribes to him as “the noblest monument of profound erudition, keen critical acumen, of unrivalled philological perception which has been left to us by any ancient author in any part of the world.” Weber describes him as in all probability connected with the Vedic Kápya Patamchala, misled according to the learned Hindu doctor, by phonetic resemblance in the name. He is also regarded as a fractional incarnation of Vishṇu. Some hints thrown out in his commentary by the sage himself, allow it to be inferred that his mother's name was Gonika and his birth-place in the eastern country, and Goldstücker in his essay on Páṇini, shows that he temporarily resided in Kashmír. He calls himself Gonardiya; a word given in the Káśiká to exemplify names of places in the East. His birthplace was therefore Gonarda, and he is regarded as one of the Eastern grammarians. All that is known of him in short is, that he was the son of a Bráhman priest, devoted to literary studies and author of two great works, his great commentary, and the Yoga Sútra. Though he is said to have lived after the time of Buddha, the Sánkhya and Yoga systems were current before the age of Buddha. Dr. Rajendralála evidences this from Buddha's own notices. The meditations he practised were in accord with the rules of the Yoga system and their nomenclature was the same. But though the antiquity of the system is undoubted, it is not the case with the text-books which are, of all the systems, of later date than Buddha. The Yoga Sútra takes for granted the twenty-five categories of the Sánkhya as the basis of its doctrine and copies some of its aphorisms verbatim. I have previously mentioned the common references to each other of the text-books of the other schools. The cardinal difference between the Sánkhya and the Yoga lies in their theistic and atheistic belief, and hence, it is that the Hindus call the Yoga the Seśvara Sánkhya or theistical, as opposed to the atheistical or Niriśvara Sánkhya. Isolation from the thinking principle is the ultimate aim of both, the Yoga attempting to reconcile the philosophy of Buddha and Kapila with a theistic religion. D. Mitra states that the Yoga text-book must be considered as posterior to that of the Sánkhya, and both later than Buddha, though the doctrine of the two schools are very old. He considers them the immediate Hindu archetypes of the nihilist theory of Buddha, and indirectly of the pessimism of Schopenhauer and Hartmann. The term Yoga is derived from the root Yuj which means both “to join” and “to meditate” and both meanings are adopted and explained by their several adherents. Technically it signifies detachment of thought from the world to concentrate it on the peculiar meditation which produces the detachment. It is also applied to almost every phase of devotion, and thirteen out of eighteen chapters of the Bhagavad Gíta treat on the same number of separate Yogas. For a fuller account of this system than is given in the following pages by Abul Fazl, I refer the reader to Dr. Ballantyne's translation of the first two chapters of Yoga Sútras and the more complete version and commentary of Dr. Mitra.
↩The punctuation in the text is incorrect and misleading and must be altered in accordance with the translation. The physical substratum of consciousness is affected by the modes like every other emanation of Prakṛiti. From the influence of ‘goodness,’ it produces the ten organs and the manas which are called, ‘good’ because of their utility: but it is only when affected by the mode ‘darkness’ that inanimate matter is created. The passion-mode, (taijasa) ardent or glowing, being the exciting mode, must co-operate in the production of all. Davies, p. 60. The Supreme Being with this system is a soul untouched by affliction, action, fruit or stock of desert, who of his own will assumed a body to create. Sarva Darśana Sangraha. He facilitates according to Dr. Mitra the attainment of liberation, but does not directly grant it and though the creator of the world is absolutely unconnected with it.
↩In this sense tejas and rajas are synonymous, vide. p. 171 where taijasa ahaṇkára is the result of rajas: vide also Colebroke, I, 261.
↩This is the same as the Sánkhya mahat and the Buddhists buddhi, or what Schopenhauer understands by Will, the absolute existence from which primordial root all organic and inorganic being proceed. Dr. Mitra thinks the term would be better interpreted by Will than by the thinking principle which is the definition of Dr. Ballantyne: v. Preface vii. It is defined later by Dr. Mitra as the form of goodness without taint: Yogi Aphorisms. 4.
↩ Or more literally, the effacement
of the reverting residua (of mental impressions).
I suspect that
According to Dr. Mitra, the object of the reversed order of conditions is that unless activity is made intelligible, no suppression of it can be grasped. The object of placing the quality of goodness last is this, that by its excess the two subsequent conditions become fit for Yoga. By concentration or Yoga, the external functions cease and on that cessation there is a complete dissolution of all functions with their residua. In both these conditions Yoga is practicable. Yoga aphorisms pp. 5–6.
↩Interpreted by Dr. Mitra, as addiction to evil actions without distinguishing between what should be done or not done.
↩ I read
“A notion without reference to the real character of the object”. I reproduce the term and definition of Dr. Mitra.
↩The aphorism is, “sleep is that function (of the thinking principle) which has for its object the conception of nothing;” that this is a functiou of the thinking principle and not a mere blank is said to be proved by our recollection on arising from sleep of having slept well which could not happen without a consciousness of it Yoga. Aph. 12.
↩That is the fear arising from the memory of pain endured in a former life. A´śaya is accepted in the aphorisms as the equivalent of vásaná and sanskára, that is, the unconscious impression in the mind of past actions producing pleasure or pain according as they were good or evil, not at once manifesting their results but remaining latent to a subsequent life.
↩The text has Saddha. I follow the nomenclature of Dr. Mitra.
↩This indifference is to be acquired both as to pleasure and pain, by friendliness towards the happy, compassionating the sorrowful, being content with the virtuous and neither encouraging nor reproving the vicious. This condition of mind facilitates the meditation called Samádhi, in its external aspect by removing distractions, and producing concentration, through cheerfulness of mind.
↩Exercise is the repeated effort that the thinking principle shall remain in its functionless state. Aversion from sensuous objects is produced by ‘dispassion ’ resulting from the knowledge of the evil influence of those objects on the thinking principle, and steadfastness is acquired by exercise which makes it a source of happiness and quiet, and by the conjoined effect of the two, the functions of the thinking principle are suppressed. Yoga. Aph. pp. 13–14.
↩ The text has by misprint
The commentator explains that when the quality of goodness of the internal organ, tinctured with a little of the qualities of foulness and darkness, is pondered, then consciousness being under the influence of goodness, becomes Sánanda or joyous. Yoga Aphorisms p. 18.
↩The reason for this negation of the prohibited deed being set down instead of the deed itself is that as, slaughter should be avoided at all times, its absence implied by non-slaughter, is first mentioned. Yoga Aph. p. 92.
↩Another reading runs ‘and thus desires cease to be inclined to evil.’
↩ External purity means the cleansing
of the body with earth or water, &c., and
the internal is the washing by means of
friendliness and the like, of all dirt
from the thinking principle. Yoga Aph.
p. 94. I read
The word properly signifies the study of the Vedas, but is here used in the technical sense of the inaudible repetition a great many times, of some selected mantra or mystical verse. Yoga Aph. 101.
↩The abbreviated form of this ejaculatory prayer, Oṃ, is a combination o three letters a, u, m, invested with a peculiar sanctity. According to Wilson (Vish. Pur.) it is typical of the three spheres of the world, the three steps of Vishṇu, &c., and in the Vedas is said to comprehend all the gods, and one text of the Vedas, “Om, the monosyllable Brahma,” is cited in the Váyu Puráṇa, which devotes a whole chapter to this term, as signifying by the latter word, either the Supreme Being or the Vedas collectively, of which the monosyllable is the tpye. Barth (Religions of India), states that each of these three letters represent the Brahman, the absolute, in his three manifestations of Brahma, Vishṇu, and ´Siva. He observes that the sectarian writers interpret the Triad conformably to their own predilections, one of the persons, either Vishṇu or ´Siva, being identified with the Supreme Being and the other two, especially Brahma, playing a subordinate part.
↩Dr. Mitra mentions 8,400000 as the number practised or recommended by Gorakshanátha, a Yogí of great renown. The names of some of these sufficiently indicate their contortions and perhaps their utility, the Staff, the Bedstead, the Seated Heron, the Seated Elephant, the Seated Camel, the Cow's mouth, the Fowl posture, the Tortoise, the Turned Tortoise, the Lion, the Lotus, the Bow-string and the Peacock. The latter is assumed by holding the ground with both hands, placing the elbows on each side of the navel and keeping the body erect. The Cow's mouth is produced by crossing the right and left ankles on the left and right sides of the chest, but the favourite with the Yogís is the Lion, in which the ankles being crossed under the seat, the hands are placed on the knees, the fingers extended, the mouth wide open, and the eyes directed to the tip of the nose in deep contemplation. The Yoga aphorism recommends such postures as ensure steadiness and comfort. It would require considerable practice before any degree of either could be appreciated by the sitter in these attitudes, but as the aim of the Yoga meditation is the suppression of the thinking principle, there is fortunately no mental strain, and the physical difficulties alone have to be overcome.
↩This term is derived from kumbha, a jar, because the vital air at that time remains quiescent as water in a jar. Dr. Mittra observes without incredulity or suspicion that when perfect control has been attained in this respect, the Yogí can live buried under earth for months and years without performing any organic functions whatever. No doubt much depends on the word when.
↩This is a more advanced stage of contemplation than Dhyána in which the ideas of other objects other than the one in view are suppressed, but not altogether effaced. In samádhi the effacement is complete, and thinking merges into thought which is the sole residuum. The body is then in a state of catalepsy or trance, and is not influenced by external objects: v. Yoga Aph. p. 124.
↩The word is derived from the intensive particle sam prefixed to yama, restraint, and means vow, binding or confinement, and indicates three means of accomplishing the Yoga.
Yoga. Aph. p. 125.
↩Prápti is substituted for Mahimá in Dr. Mitra's Yoga Aphorisms.
↩The suppression of all carnal desires. Ibid. p. 121.
↩According to Dr. Mitra, pada, which has the same meaning. The number of the aphorisms is 194.
The relation of modern spiritualism to the Yoga has been noticed by Dr. Mitra who regards it as based on this doctrine. The eternity of the soul is acknowledged by both: both recognise a course of gradual progress which has perfection for its goal; the powers of commanding departed souls to be visible to, and to hold converse with, man; the regulation of breath and other exercises to attain occult powers of the most transcendental kind; the projection of body to any place at will and the like. There is however, a difference in the motive of their acquisition of these powers, the mode of life of the Yogí ascetic precluding the idea of material comfort as their object, while it is the profession of the medium and his source of daily bread. Apart from the demonstrative and experimental sciences, of which the law is progress, the archetypes of most modern discoveries in the fields of metaphysics and natural theology, will be found in India and Greece.
↩The Jainas take this name from the term Jina, a deified Saint, a being worthy of universal adoration and having subdued all passions, equivalent to Arhat, Jinésvara, Tírthankara and other synonyms of this incarnate being. Colebrooke (Essay II, 171) mentions 24 Jinas or Arhats, who have appeared in the present Avasarpiṇi age, 24 others who have appeared in the past Utsarpiṇi period, and 24 others who will appear in the future. The genealogies of the 24 of the present period are briefly given, but will be read rather for curiosity than instruction. Their stature varies from 500 to 15 poles, and their duration of life between 8,400,000 and 100 great years. The Avasarpiṇi and Utsarpiṇi ages together equal 2000, 000, 000, 000, 000 oceans of years. An ocean of years is the time that would elapse before a vast cavity filled with chopped hairs could be emptied at the rate of one piece of hair in a century: the time requisite to empty such a cavity measured by a Yojana every way is a palya and that repeated 1000 000, 000 000 000 times is an ocean or Ságara. The most celebrated of the Jinas, was Párśvanátha of the race of Ikshwáku, and is thought by Colebrooke and Lassen to be the real founder of the sect. He was born at Báṇárasi in Kattiwár and died according to the Kalpa Sútra, a work of great authority among the Jains, 1280 years before the date of that book, which Colebrooke calculates was composed about 1500 years ago, though Weber will not admit a date earlier than the twelth or thirteenth century. The last, Jina, was, Vardhamana, named also, Víra, Mahávíra &c., and surnamed Charama tírthakṛit, or last of the Jinas, emphatically called ´Sramaṇa, or saint. His life and institutions form the subject of the Kalpa Sútra translated both by Stevenson (very faultily according to Weber,) and Jacobi. His death according to tradition, occurred more than 2400 years ago or 250 years after the apotheosis of the preceding Jina. Colebrooke discusses and rejects the opinion that the religion and institutions of the orthodox Hindus are more modern than the doctrines of Jina and Buddha. Barth observes that viewed as a whole, Jainism is so exact a reproduction of Buddhism that there is difficulty in accounting for both, their long existence side by side and the cordial hatred between them. The Jainas maintain that Gautama Buddha was a disciple of their founder, and their 24 Jinas correspond exactly with the 24 predecessors of Buddha the last of whom, like the last Jina, was of the royal race of Kaśyapa. They deny with the Bauddhas or Saugatas, the divine authority, of the Vedas, and admit like the Sánkhya philosophy, the eternity of matter and the perpetuity of the world. Their avoidance of injury to life is wellknown, and the Jaina monks usually bear a broom to sweep insects out of their way lest they should unconsciously destroy being. They distinguish five kinds of bodies or involucra connected with the soul at various periods of its eternal existence. The soul is never completely separated from matter until it obtains a final release by deification through disengagement from good and evil in the person of a beatified Saint. Intermediately it receives retribution for the benefits or injuries it has given or inflicted in precedent existences, receiving pain or pleasure from the same individual it had thus affected. Like the Buddhists they are divided into a clerical body, Yatis or ascetics, and laity, Sravakas, (hearers) and observe the rules of caste without attaching any religious significance to it.
In the south of India, according to Wilson (Essays I, 335), the Jainas preserve the distinction of castes: in Upper India, they profess to be of one caste, the Vaiśya, but the admission to the Jain communion was originally independent of it. Mahavíra, their object of worship, was himself the son of a King and therefore a Khsatriya; his chief disciples were Bráhmans; his especial attendant, Gośála, was an outcaste, and his followers of both sexes were of every caste. They have adapted themselves to the prevailing form of Hiuduism at various places. Jain inscriptions at Abú begin with invocations of ´Síva and Dekhan Edicts of Bukka Ráya of Vijayanagar proclaim their identity with the Vaishnavas. A Jain on renouncing his sect, takes his place as a Kshatriya or a Vaiśya, among orthodox Hindus, and their priests are recruited from the Bráhman caste itself. Barth observes that it is to them and to the Buddhists that the first literary culture of the Canarese and Tamil languages can be traced. Before the tenth centuary they were the dominant caste in the Dekhan, but at the present time they are reduced to very inconsiderable numbers. In Western India they are generally wealthy and given to trade. In Hazáribágh District where the sanctuary Párasnáth is still an object of pilgrimage, they number about 5,000 souls among a Hindu population of nearly 6,50,000. (Stat. Acct. of Bengal XVI, 82). Into the disputed question of the origin and development of the religion and its kinship with, or descent from, Buddhism I do not enter. Hermann Jacobi in his preface to the Jaina Sútras, with Colebrooke and Stevenson asserts the independent rise of the Jaina creed against the combined authority of Lassen, Wilson, Weber and Barth, His arguments though ingenious are not convincing. Other scholars have entered the lists and the controversy is undecided. Weber rightly lays much stress on the fact that Rájagṛiha was the scene of Máhavíra's labours as well as of those of Buddha, and he considers that the whole tenor of Máhavíra's legend strengthens the conclusion that it is but a variation of that of Buddha. (v. Fragment der Bhagavati p. 194. II, and 241, and introduction to Vol. I). In his contribution to the Indian Antiquary on the sacred literature of the Jains, he again deliberately states his conclusion that the Jains are one, though the oldest, of the Buddhistic sects. The number and significance of common features in both traditions in reference to the life and labours of their founders, out-weigh any arguments that make for the contrary opinion. The Jain texts it is to be remembered, were codified in writing 1,000 years after the death of their founder; an interval which allows considerable scope for the cumulative forces of tradition. Weber thinks it marvellous that the texts, in the face of such a fact, contain so much that is original. The wonder is rather that there is not more.
↩The text has two variant readings and a prefix of Sáṃ to Vyávahárika.
↩That is, the abolition of hindrances causes their right intuition.
↩By the absence of all envy, by sympathy and the like.
↩Ābul Fazl writes this word Sumarana and many of his transliterations are in Hindi or Prákrit e. g. biddiya for vidya as at p. 11. Throughout this exposition of Hindu philosophy I have adhered to the proper Sanskrit spelling.
↩These are the six periods into which each of the Utsarpiṇi and Avasarpiṇi ages are divided. Their names are given in Major Mackenzie's account of the Jains in Vol. IX. As. Research, p. 257. These two great ages revolve for ever in ascending and descending periods like the increase and wane of the moon. In the declining period men pass from extreme felicity to extreme misery; in the rising period this order is reversed. In the first ages the lives of men extend to oceans of years and their stature to leagues, and they subsist on the fruit of miraculous trees that yield food, apparel, light, habitation and the necessaries and ornaments of life. In the fourth age the limit of life decreases to 10 million years, and their stature to 500 poles. In the fifth, one hundred years is the normal age and the limit of stature is seven cubits. In the sixth, it is reduced to 16 years and the height to one cubit. In the next period the succession of ages is reversed and afterwards they recommence as before. Colebrooke.
↩This passage is doubtful in the text and I am not sure of my interpretation, but in Colebrooke's catalogue of the 24 Arhas their apotheosis occurs at various periods of the third and fourth ages.
The periodical creations and destructions of the world form part of the Pauranic legends and of the Jaina creed. The heavens and earth in general, are supposed to be eternal, but this portion of the earth, A´rya or Bharata, is liable to destruction and renovation. It is destroyed by a poisonous wind after which a shower of fire consumes the whole region. It is restored by a shower of butter, followed by one of milk, and another of the juice of the sugarcane. Men and animals migrate from the other five regions into which Jambu-dwípa is divided and inhabit the new Arya or Bharata-kánḍa. The inhabitants of five of the Kánḍas are called mlechchhas or barbarians. Bharata-kánḍa is divided into fifty-six provinces (desas) or antara-dwípas. v. Dr. Buchanan's notice of the Jains. As. Res. IX, p. 282.
↩Namely, touch, see the Sarva Darśana Sangraha, p. 51.
↩This is applicable to the “locomotive” trasa, as distinguished from the immovable, (sthavara).
↩More correctly, the division of souls is into ‘mundane’ and ‘released.’ The “mundane” pass from birth to birth and are divided into two, those possessing an internal sense (samanaska) and those destitute of it (amanaska). The former possess saṃjṅná, the power of apprehension, talking, acting or receiving instruction, and the latter are without this power. These last are again divided into the locomotive and immovable. Those that possess only the one sense of touch are considered as ‘released,’ as incapable of passing into any other state of existence. Among the latter are the souls embodied in earth, fire, water and air and are only perceptible when an infinite number of them are united. They possess but the one organ of touch, have undeveloped (avyakta) intellect and feelings (vedanâ) but no limbs. Water-lives are divided into the sentient, senseless, and mixed. Only that water which is the abode of senseless lives can be used, therefore water must be strained, after which process only the senseless lives remain. v. Sarv. Darś. Sang. and Jacobi's Jaina Sútras, p. 5. n.
↩In its primary signification vital action and chiefly respiration. In a secondary acceptation, the corporeal organs of sense and action. These are variously stated from seven to thirteen; see Colebrooke I, 380–81.
↩These ten are the progeny of Asuras, Serpents, Garuda, Dikpálas, Fire, Air, the Ocean, Thunder and Lightning, who are supposed to reside in the several hells or regions below the earth. The Vyantaras, have eight orders. These are the Piśáchas, Bhútas, Kinnaras, Gandharvas and other monstrous divinities inhabiting woods, and the lower regions and air. The third has five orders, the Sun, Moon, Planets, Asterisms and other heavenly bodies. The fourth includes the gods of present and past Kalpas. Of the first kind are those born in the Heavens Saudharma I´śána, Mahendra, Brahmá Sanatkumára, ´Sukra, &c., to the number of twelve. The last class reside in two divisions of five and nine heavens, the five termed Vijaya, Vaijayanta, Jayanta, Aparájita, the middle being Sarvártha-Siddha: the second termed Anuttara, because there are none beyond them, as they crown the triple construction of the universe. A great number of Indras are recognised, but ´Sukra and I´śána the regents of the North and South are the chief. Above all these rank in dignity as objects of worship the twenty-four Tírthankaras or with those of the past and future periods, seventy-two. Wilson (Essays 1, 320)
↩Or palya, vide n. p. 188.
↩
The izáfat after
A measure of space through which the gods are able to travel in six months at the rate of 2,05,7152 Yojanas of 2,000 Krośa each in the twinkling of an eye. Colebrooke, II, 198. but Abul Fazl gives another measure lower down.
↩The nine tiers represent a necklace (graiveyaka).
↩The world, writes Colebrooke, (Essays II, 198) which according to the Jains is eternal, is figured by them as a spindle resting on half of another, or as three cups of which the lowest is inverted and the uppermost meets at its circumference the middle one. They also represent it as a woman with her arms akimbo. Her waist, the meeting of the lower cups, is the earth. The spindle above, answering to the superior portion of the woman's person, is the abode of the gods, and the inferior part of the figure comprehends the infernal regions. The earth which they suppose to be a flat surface, is bounded by a circle of which the diameter is one ráju. The lower spindle comprises seven tiers of inferior earths or hells, at the distance of a ráju from each other and its base is measured by seven rájus.
These seven hells are Ratna-prabhá, ´Sarkará-prabhá, Báluka-parbhá, Pankaprabhá, Dhúmá-prabhá, Tamaprabhá and Tamatamaprabhá. The upper spindle is also seven rájus high and its greatest breadth is five rájus. Its summit which is 4,500,000 yojanas wide, is the abode of the deified saints: beneath this are five Vimánas or abodes of gods. Next, at the distance of one ráju from the summit, follow nine tiers of worlds representing a necklace. Under these are twelve (the Digambaras say sixteen) other regions in eight tiers from one to five rájus above the earth filled with Vimánas or abodes of various classes of gods called Kalpavásis. These gods are mortal except, perhaps, the luminaries. The earth consists of numerous distinct continents in concentric circles separated by seas forming ways between them of which the first is Jambu-dwípa with the mountain Meru in the centre. The remaining continents are almost a repetition of these already described by Abul Fazl at page 28 of this volume and do not here need a further notice.
↩ A variant has
Var. “three Ságaras.”
↩“Je sens un grand embarras,” says Mr. Barthélemy Saint Hilaire, referring to similar extravagances of Buddhist belief, “à exposer toutes ces absurdités, qui ont aussi peu de grace que du bon sens, et je voudrais les épargner au lecteur, si je ne tenais a lui donner une idée fidèle de ces monuments, vénérés par tant de peuples, quelque déraisonnables et monstrueux quils soient.” Legende du Bouddha. p. 71.
↩ The text has
Colebrooke's order for these personages, runs: 24 Jinas or Tírthankaras, 12 Chakravartis, 9 Vasudevas, 9 Baladevas, and 9 Prativásudevas. Mackenzie's list appears from Colebrooke's note, to be incorrect.
↩These are the kalpa-vṛikhas or celestial trees, of which Major Mackenzie mentions nine varieties. Their gradual disappearance portends the destruction of the world.
↩For Prákrit, Jugala, Sanskrit, Yugala, a pair, turned into adjectival form. Major Mackenzie names the people of the three ages, 1st uttama-bhoga-bhúmi-pravartaka or “supremely happy inhabitants of the earth” when the miraculous trees were in full produce: 2nd Madhyama-bhoga-bhúmi-prav.; moderately happy inhabitants; 3rd Jaghanya-bhoga, &c., or least happy inhabitants, when the trees were straitened in produce. In the fourth age no miraculous fruits were produced.
↩This stage is presumably above or below the first or last zone.
↩Derived from the Sanskrit ´Siśumára (child-killing), the Gangetic porpoise: in Persian it commonly means a species of lizard.
↩Probably some kind of eel, but I do not trace the word in any dictionary.
↩In the text read ghaṛi for gari.
↩See p. 193.
↩V. p. 198. n.
↩ To make sense of this passage I
have been compelled to omit the
Spelt differently at p. 50 of the text, and p. 111 of this volume.
↩The text has bikharba through the correct term is rightly given at p. 51 of the text.
↩Lake-born; an epithet of the lotus which in Sanskrit is also called padma.
↩Compounds sometimes arise from separation and conjunction combined and hence are called pudgalas, because they “fill” (púr) and “dissolve” (gal.) ´Sarva, Sangr, Darśana, p. 52. Weber translates it Atom-Stoff. Fragment der. Bhag. p 236. Abul Fazl transliterates Putgal.
↩This word signifies the elements of being or the forms of mundane consciousness of which there are five in the Buddhist philosophy. Pradeśa, one of the forms of the soul's bondage, is the entrance into the different parts of the soul by the masses, made up of an endless number of parts, of the various bodies developed by the consequences of actions. S. S. Darśana' p. 56. I do not find pramáṇa as a division of pudgala in Colebrooke nor in the S. S. D.
↩Pudgala possesses colour, odour, savour and tactility according to Colebrooke: as wind, fire, water, earth; either atoms or aggregates of atoms; individual body, collective worlds, &c.
↩The former of these two last-named, is said to be inferrible from a right direction of the organs. Dharma is explained as a substance or thing (dravya), from which may be concluded, as its effect, the souls's ascent to the region above. The latter is the reverse of the foregoing. Adharma causes the soul to continue embarrassed with the body notwithstanding its tendency to soar. The word astikáya signifies a predicament or category, or conformably with its etymology, that of which it is said (káyate), that “it is” (asti).
↩Lebens-geist. Weber. There are three descriptions of this:—the perfect soul of the deified saints: the liberated soul: and the soul in bondage. Ajíva comprehends the four elements and all that is fixed, as mountains, or moveable, as rivers, and is synonymous with Pudgala.
↩The synonymous terms Dharma and Adharma are used by Colebooke, and in S. S. Darśana for punya and pápa. The latter work mentions the eight prakṛitis or mula-prakṛitis called the eight Karmans in Govindánandas' gloss, (Ved. Sút.), p. 55.
↩ I read the variant
This means the movement or natural impulse of the soul to act, called Yoga. As a door opening into the water is called A´srava, because it causes the stream to descend, so by this impulse, the consequences of acts flow in upon the soul. It is the association of the body with right or wrong deeds and comprises all the karmans. All these eight classes of acts are mentioned in the Bhagavati. v. Weber's Fragment der Bhagavati, p. 166, II.
↩Nirjará is that which entirely (nir), wears and antiquates (jarayati), all sin previously incurred and the whole effect of works It consists chiefly in mortification. Bondage is that which binds the embodied spirit by association of the soul with deeds. Moksha is its deliverance from the fetters of works, v. ColebrookeI, p. 407. The Sarva Sang-Darś. enumerates the tattvas according to different authorities as two, five or seven. The seven are jíva, ajíva ásrava, bandha, saṃvará, nirjara and moksha: the five, jíva, ákáśa, dharma, adharma and pudgala: two, jíva and ajíva: Wilson mentions nine.
↩These are mentioned passim in the Akáranga Sútra as delicacies to be avoided. Jacobi.
↩I correct the transliterations from H. H. Wilson's text (Essays I, 284). The Sthánángam, is on the organs in which life abides, or the ten acts essential to purity. The Samaváyángam, on the hundred Padárthas or categories. The Bhagavatyangam, on the ritual or rules for worship. The Jṅnátádharmakathá, an account of the acquisition of knowledge by holy personages. The Upásakadaśá, rules for the conduct of ´Srávakas or secular Jains, apparently in ten lectures. The Antakṛiddaśá, on the actions of the Tírthankaras in ten lectures. The ninth is on the principal or final births of the Tírthankaras in ten lectures. The tenth is a grammar of questions, probably on the code of the Jains. The eleventh on the fruits or consequences of actions. To this list which is taken from Hemachandra of the Svetambara sect, who was a zealous propagator of the Jain doctrines in the twelfth century, a supplementary twelfth Anga, called Dṛishtiváda is added, divided into five portions. Besides these which profess to be derived from the oral instructions of Mahávira himself to his disciples and especially to Gautama, there is a class of works fourteen in number, enumerated by Hemachandra, called Púrvas because they were drawn up by the Gaṇadharas before the Angas. Abul Fazl has taken this aggregate of fourteen works, as the entire twelfth Anga to which he prefixes Púrva with the Hindi numeral chaudah. The Púrvas, treat of the doctrine of existence, and non-existence, of holy knowledge, discussion of truth, investigation of spirit, nature of corporeal life and the like.
The tradition of the Svetambaras runs that the fourteen Púrvas had been incorporated in the twelfth Anga, the Drishṭiváda, which was lost before 1000. A. V. A detailed table of contents of it and the Púrvas has survived in the fourth Anga, the Samaváyánga and in the Nandi Sútra. Jacobi: Jaina Sútras p. XLV). I refer the reader to Weber's Sacred Lit. of the Jains published in the Indian Antiquary for an exhaustive criticism on the Angas and Púrvas, their tenor and antiquity. The existing Siddhánta belongs exclusively to the Svetámbaras, and the loss of the Drishṭiváda, he conjectures, is due to the influence of their orthodoxy, as it had direct reference to the doctrines of the schismatics. It had been added to the other eleven as a secondary addition and its incongruity with the rest led to its suppression. Uncertainty and want of fixity attach to the entire Jain writings; the oldest portions of their literature are but disjecta membra, and as regards the date of their composition, separated from each other by extensive periods. I. A. Part CCXIII, p. 285.
↩An error for Mahávíra.
↩An error for Mahávíra.
↩In the text Anuttaro-vayánga.
↩The Sanskrit for this Prákrit word is Prakirṇa, and signifies a collection of miscellaneous rules.
Weber in his Sacred literature of the Jains says that the third group of texts of the Siddhánta is formed by the ten páinnas, a name which denoting ‘scattered, hastily sketched” pieces, well suits their real nature as a group of texts corresponding to the Vedic paríśishtas. It is as yet undetermined how old is their position as the third part of the Siddhánta and what caused their location there. They are with few exceptions in metre and a considerable portion of them refers to the proper sort of euthanasy, the confession required for this end and the abjuration of everything evil. Physiology, mythology and astrology and hymns are also treated. (I. A. Part CCLIX. April 1892,) Weber is unable to make out the significance of the title Múla-Sútra, of which there are four. The text is composed in metre and principally ślokas. The entire Siddhánta according to Weber, at present embraces 45 texts divided into six groups. (1). eleven or twelve Angas. (2). twelve Upángas. (3). ten Painnas. (4). six Cheddasútras. (5). two Sútras without a common name, Nandi and Anuyògadváram. (6). four Múla-Sutras.
The names of all these will be found in I. A. Part CCXIII, October, 1888,
↩The term ´Sramana (in Prákrit and Hindi, written Samana) is also applied by the Jainas to the Yati with the same meaning, and is similarly employed by the Buddhists: and Wilson (I. 175) supposes that the Sommonacodom of Siam is merely a corruption of the words ´Sramana Gautama, the holy Gautama or Buddha.
↩From Gaṇa-iśa lord of troops; Gaṇa with the Jains signifies a school or a school derived from one teacher, and Gaṇadhara, the head thereof. Abul Fazl employs either the Hindi or Prakrit forms for these words. ´Sishya is Síkh, commonly applied to the followers of Nának.
↩ This work is mentioned by Wilson
(I. 281. Essays 1862, Rost) as one of
the eleven primary works of the Jainas,
an instruction in the various sources of
wordly pain, or in the paths of virtue,
and consists of lessons given to Gautama
by Mahávíra and is in Prákrit, in 36,000
stanzas. The Bhagavati is named by
Hemachandra in his enumeration of the
sacred Angas or Jaina scriptures, in the
fifth place. Its title signifies ‘the
blessed’ (i. e.,) “instruction” or
I read
I translate with diffidence this crabbed and ungrammatical sentence. The A´káranga Sútra lays down rules for these cases. The reason for the prohibition regarding food set on a loft, or platform or elevated place, is that the layman might fetch and erect a stool or ladder and fall from it and thus hurt his person or injure other living beings in his descent. Neither should a monk or nun accept food prepared overthe fire, (Jacobi, p. 105, 113) nor accept food which for the sake of another has been put before the door, if the house-holder has not permitted him to do so or if he gives it to him. (p. 118), nor which he knows has been prepared for the sake of many ´Sramaṇas, and Bráhmaṇas, guests, paupers and beggars. (91).
↩ The text has
Two of the three robes are linen under garments, Kshaumikakalpa, and one woollen upper garment (aurṇikakalpa). Besides these (kalpatrya), the monk possesses an alms-bowl (pátra), with six things belonging to it, a broom (rajoharaṇa), and a veil for the mouth (mukhavastrika). Jacobi, p. 67, n. 3.
↩“The emblem or ensign of religion.” This term is commonly applied in Sanskrit to a hypocrite, as one who hangs out a flag of religion to cover other designs. Their broom is called ‘rajoharaṇa, dust remover.
↩The reason of this is, that many living beings are produced and many seeds spring up, the footpaths are not recognisable. (Jacobi) p. 136.
↩There are various readings to this passage, one being exactly the reverse of the prohibitory injunction in the text.
↩There is a division between the Digambaras and Svetambaras on this point, the latter conceding the doubtful privilege of final annihilation to women also. The other points of difference may be read in Wilson's Essays I. p. 340. They are not of sufficient importance to record in a note, but not too trivial to create the bitterest rancour between the orders. The priestly caste among the Jainas, as among the Brahmanical Hindus, is divided into four orders; the student (Brahmacharya), the householder (gṛihastha), the hermit (vánaprasha) and the mendicant (bhikshuka).
↩
Among these are, Bodhi-sattva (essence of intelligence) ´Sramaṇa Gautama, Mahá ´Sramaṇa (the great ascetic), Tathágata (one who hath gone, i. e., proceeded like his predecessors, the Buddhas), Sugata (the Welcome) Bhagavat (the divine), Arhat, Sarvártha-Siddha (all fulfilled) Devatideva (god of gods) and others. E. Rockhill. (Life of Buddha) and Saint-Hilaire (Le Bouddha et sa religion). Abul Fazl gives the name of the father as Siddhodan, Bishop Bigandet, Thoodaudana, doubtless the Burmese prononciation of the palatal sibilant.
↩According to Foucaux (Histoire du Bouddha Sakya Mouni), from the right-side of his mother ‘sans que le côté droit de sa mére fút brisé, de méme qu’ autrefois quand il y etáit entré (p. 97.) A plate taken from a bas-relief of the Calcutta Museum is given by Foucaux in the appendix to his volume, showing the birth of Buddha in the fashion described. The earthquakes take place when a Buddha enters and leaves the womb of his mother, and when he passes into Nirvána, (59). The light filled the world at the time of his leaving the Tushita, or fourth heaven, accompanied by hundreds of millions of deities, to enter the womb of his mother, and again broke forth eclipsing the sun and moon, and the splendours of Brahmá and Indra at his birth. His steps were made in the direction of the cardinal points, and according to the Tibetan account of Rockhill, looking to the East he said, ‘I will reach the highest Nirvána:’ to the South, ‘I will be the first of all creatures:’ to the West, “this will be my last birth:” to the North, “I will cross the ocean of existence:” but the directions, the sentences, the manner of the steps, differ in Rockhill, Bigandet, Hardy, and Foucaux. I may conclude with Saint-Hilaire; “je ne citerais point ses folies si elles ne servaient d' abord à faire connaître la tournure d'esprit des Bouddhistes, et ensuite à montrer a'quelle hauteur ils placent leur Bouddha au dessus de tous les dieux du Panthéon brahmanique.”
↩The ancient Rájágṛiha of which the ruins may still be seen in the Patna district, identified by Genl. Cunningham as the residence of Buddha and the capital of the ancient Magadha, called also, by him Kuśágára-púra (town of the Kúsa-grass); Kusinárá and Kusinagara in Rockhill. It was visited and described by the Chinese pilgrims Hiouen Thsang and Fa-Hian. It is girdled by its five hills, one of which Baibhár, is the Webháro Mountain of the Páli annals, containing the Sattapanni cave, in front of which the first Buddhist Synod was held in 543, B. C. Another cave is in the Ratnagiri hills, which in the Lalita Vistara, is said to have been the scene of Buddha's meditations: V. Anc. Geog. of India.
↩The 40th year of the Iláhi era, corresponding with A. D., 1596, would make the date of the Buddha's death B. C., 1366. The supposed date of this occurrence differs widely, as Mr. Cowell observes (Colebrooke. Essays I. 414, n.) in the various, Buddhist countries, the most probable being B. C. 543 or 477. Foucaux gives fourteen dates found in the Tibetan works, viz., B. C. 2422, 2148, 2135, 2139, 1310, 752, 653, 546, 880, 837, 576, 884, 1060, 882 (from Csoma, Tibetan Grammar, p. 199–201.) Trans. Lalita-vistara, Introd, xi.
↩In the Tibetan version of the Maháparinirváṇa Sútra, “The Book of the Great Decease,” are related the events of the last year, the seventy-ninth of the Buddha's life; v. Rockhill, p. 122.
↩In the text Bakhshi. This word occurs in Marco Polo (Yule I. 293) as Bacsi and in a note (p. 305) it is explained to be a corruption of Bhikshu, the proper Sanskrit term for a religious mendicant and in particular for Buddhist devotees. The word was probably applied, adds the note, to a class only of the Lámas but among the Turks and Persians became a generic name for them all, and this passage from the Ain is quoted in support. It continues, that according to Pallas the word among the modern Mongols is used in the sense of teacher, and is applied to the oldest and most learned priest of a community, who is the local ecclesiastical chief. Among the Kirghiz Kazzáks the word survives in Marco Polo's sense of a “medicine-man” or conjurer. In Western Turkistán it has come to mean a Bard. From its association with persons who could read and write, it seems to have gradually passed into the sense of a clerk. Under the Mahomedan rule, it was applied to an officer who performed duties analogous to those of Quarter-master General and thence came to mean a paymaster.
↩There are four well-known sects which have arisen among the Bauddhas. The Mádhyamikas or Nihilists maintain, on a literal interpretation of Buddha's sútras, that all is void. The Yogácháras or Subjective Idealists, acknowledge all else but internal sensation or intelligence to be void. The Sautrántikas, or Representationists, allow no external objects apprehensible by perception. The Vaibháshikas, acknowledge the direct perception of exterior objects. Both these latter think that objects cease to exist when no longer perceived; they have a brief duration like a flash of lightning, lasting no longer than the perception of them. Their identity is momentary; the atoms or component parts are scattered, and the concourse or aggregation was momentary. The Sarva Sangraha Darśaṇa, discusses the subtile position at some length. The momentariness of fleeting things, the colour blue, &c., is to be inferred from their existence; thus whatever is, is momentary like a bank of clouds, and all these things are. An existence of practical efficiency is established by perception to belong to the blue and other momentary things, and the exclusion of existence from that which is not momentary is established, provided we exclude from it non-momentary succession and simultaneity, as exclusion of the continent is exclusion of the contained. Practical efficiency is contained under succession and simultaneity. It cannot reside under the permanent because during its exertion of present practical efficiency it has no such power over the past or future. Hence succession and simultaneity being excluded from the non-fluxional, and the latter being without practical efficiency, the existence of the alternative of momentariness is established. Professor Gough in a note, illustrates this view by a quotation from Ferrier's Lectures and Remains, in which he considers the heavens glowing with a thousand hues continually changing, so that no abiding colour can be seen, even for the shortest time. In the millionth part of a second, the whole glory of the painted scene undergoes an incalculable series of mutations; it is a series of fleeting colours, no one of which is, because each of them is continually melting into and vanishing in another.
↩This reading is in the notes to the text, which selects a variant having a directly opposite meaning, but this would be in contradiction to the common practice of the Bhikshus, and of Buddha himself, v. Rockville pp. 56–57.
↩ So in the Sarva Sangraha Darśana,
“After acquiring wealth in abundance,
the twelve inner-seats are to be thoroughly
reverenced: what use of reverencing
aught else below.” The five
organs of knowledge, the five organs of
action, the common sensory, and the intellect
have been described by the wise
as the twelve inner seats.” For
These five are termed Skandhas (in Páli. Khandhas) that is the elements and attributes of being. They embrace all the essential properties of every sentient being, possessed in a greater or less degree, according to the being. When a man dies, his Khandhas perish, but by the force of his merits (Kamma) a new set starts into existence, and a new being appears in another world, who though possessing different Khandhas, and a different form, is in reality identical with the deceased, because his Kamma is the same. v. Colebrooke, I. 418, n. from Childers. Prof. Cowell observes that thus according to the stricter schools of Buddhist philosophy, as represented in Ceylon, soul does not exist apart from the five Skandhas, and is simply their aggregation, and consequent ly, any real transmigration cannot properly be affirmed of Buddhism.
↩A variant has—‘Seeking to do the pleasure of others.’
↩The Bauddhas do not recognize soul (Jíva or átman) distinct from intelligence (chitta). This latter dwelling within the body and possessing individual consciousness, apprehends objects and subsists as self. In that view only is átman, self or soul. Colebrooke I, 47.
↩ The full stop after
An external percipibile is not admissible in consequence of the following dilemma. Does the object cognitively apprehensible arise from an entity or not? It does not, for that which is generated has no permanence, nor is it non-resultant, for what has not come into being is non-existent. Or do you hold that a past object is cognitively apprehensible as begetting cognition? If so, it is nonsense because it conflicts with the apparent presentness of the object, and on such a supposition, the sense organs might be apprehended. Further is the percipibile, a simple atom or a complex body? The latter it cannot be, this alternative being ejected by the dilemma as to whether the whole or part is perceived. The former alternative is equally impossible, an atom being supersensible. Intellect having therefore no other percipibile but itself, is shown to be its own percipibile, and luminous with its own light. Sarv. Sang Dar. p. 24.
↩The derivation of these terms is thus given by the Sarva. Sang. Dar.
The Nihilists are excellent in assenting to that which their religious teacher announces, and defective in interrogation, hence their conventional designation of Mádhyamikas or Mediocre. The Yogácháras are so styled because while they accept the four points of view proclaimed by their spiritual guide, and the void of external things, they ask ‘why has a void of the internal (or baselessness of mental phenomena) been admitted. ’ The name Sautrántika arose from the fact that the Buddha said to certain of his disciples who asked what was the ultimate purport (antra), of the aphorism (sútra). ‘As you have inquired the final purport of the aphorism, be Sautrántikas. Those that reject belief in a void, and that sensation alone is reality and that sensible objects are inferrible, hold all this to be absurd language (viruddhá-bháshá) and are known as Vaibháshikas.
Whether the same sects yet subsist among the Bauddhas of Ceylon, Tibet and trans-gangetic India and in China, Professor Gough thinks deserves inquiry. It may be safely affirmed that their continuity is as little enduring as that of the doctrine from which they sprung. One hundred and ten years after Buddha's death ten propositions were put forward by the Bhikshus of Vaisáli, which were not of the master's teaching, and condemned by that Council. V. Rockhill. Chap. IV. The history of eighteen schools produced by a great schism is briefly sketched in the following chapter.
↩This term signifies one who disowns the existence of a future life. Chárváka is mentioned in the Mahábhárata, according to Prof. Cowell. (Colebrooke, I. 426, n.), as a rákshasa who endeavoured by a false report of Bhíma's death to win the Páṇḍavas in the moment of their triumph. The founding of the sect is ascribed to Vṛihaspati, whose aphorisms, (Várhaspatya Sútras) quoted by one of the commentators of the Vedánta, were made the object of a long and fruitless search in India by Dr. Fitz Edward Hall. (Dr. Muir. Journ. R. A. S. 299–314). Dr. Muir is not aware how far this sect can be traced back in Indian literature. Nástikas (Nihilists), Páshaṇḍís (heretics), and revilers of the Vedas are mentioned in many parts of Manu's Institutes, but it is not clear what sects are comprised under these terms: traces of a sceptical spirit are found throughout Indian and indeed all literature, the common parasitic growth on all systems of belief. Dr. Banerjea, clearly shows the results of philosophical speculations on the Brahmanical creed, and how small was the essential difference between the heretical and so-called orthodox schools. The Lokáyatikas (worldlings or prevalent in the world, from loka-áyata) are a branch of this sect according to Colebrooke, but the term is employed as a synonym for the Chárvákas in the Sarva-Sangraha Darśaṇa. This latter work gives an exposition of their doctrine, which in brief is that the end of man is enjoyment of sensual pleasure, the only hell, mundane pain, the only Supreme, an earthly monarch and the only liberation, death. The four elements are the original principles from which when transformed into the body, intelligence is produced, as sugar with a ferment and other ingredients becomes an intoxicating liquor, or as betel, areca, lime and extract of catechu chewed together, possess an exhilarating property not found in those substances severally. The soul being identical with the body, the attribution of qualities, as fatness, leanness, &c., to the body is intelligible as being the seat of self-consciousness. Inference is not admitted, (as smoke from fire), because the invariable connection of the middle term with the major, found likewise in the minor, does not possess its power of causing inference by virtue of its existence, as the eye, &c., are the causes of perception, but through its being known. The means of this connection being known, is not perception neither external, because in the case of the past and future, the universal proposition, embracing the invariable connection of the major and middle terms, cannot in every case be known, nor internal, since the mind is dependent on the senses; it is not inference, because every inference requires another to establish it, causing a retrogression ad infinitum; it is not testimony, nor comparison, and since the knowledge of the condition must precede the knowledge of its absence, it is only in the former case that a knowledge of the universality of the proposition is possible, that is, a knowledge in the form of such a connection between the middle term and major term, as is distinguished by the absence of such a condition, and as, again, the knowledge of the condition depends on that of the invariable connection, the fallacy of reasoning in a circle is produced. Hence by the impossibility of knowing the universality of a proposition inference is impossible. The chapter concludes with a quotation from Bṛihaspati in recommendation of the maxim ‘eat and drink, for to-morrow we die,’ imputing the invention of religious rites to the desire of gaining a livelihood, and the authorship of the Vedas to buffoons, knaves, and demons. Abul Fazl's concluding words are fully justified. It is this sect which appears to be denounced in the Bhagavad Gíta (XVI. 10 ff.), “Giving themselves up to insatiable lusts, full of deceit, vanity and folly, they cherish immoderate thoughts ending in death, accounting the enjoyment of their lusts their chief good. ‘This’ they say, ‘I have gained to-day; that desire of my heart I shall obtain. This possession is now mine: that also shall be mine hereafter. I am rich, I am noble. What other man is like unto me. I will give largesse. I will be merry.’ Tossed to and fro by many thoughts, enveloped in the meshes of delusion, devoted to their lusts, they go down to hell.” The Bhagavad Gíta was probably not written before the third century, A. D., and the thoughts and language strikingly recall the Christian Scriptures from which it is suspected with much reason, that it drew its inspiration.
↩In the Mimáṃsá, “Vidhi refers to those passages of the Veda, which being in the potential, imperative, or passive future participle, have a directly injunctive force; Arthaváda refers to those which explain and illustrate the object of some act enjoined by a former Vidhi.” (Colebrooke, I. 327, note by Prof. Cowell.) A sketch of the general tenor of the Vedas will be found in Colebrooke, I. 8–102. The Ṛigveda contains mantras or prayers, chiefly encomiastic whence the name, from the verb ṛich to praise, and the term has become applicable to such passages of any Veda as are subject to rules of prosody. The first Veda in Vyása's compilation comprises most of these texts and is called the Ṛig Veda. The Yajur Veda relates chiefly to oblations and sacrifices as its name implies, from the root Yaj, to worship. It contains some passages called ṛich as being in metre. It is divided into two the white Yajur Veda and the Black. The first is the shortest of the Vedas, and both contain prayers and invocations. The distinction of colour is from the disgorging of the original Veda by a disobedient disciple at the command of his preceptor Vaiśampáyana, the rest of whose disciples were instructed to pick up and swallow the soiled texts, which were then called ‘black.’ This they did in the form of partridges, (tittiri) hence the name Taittiriya, applied to it. The disciple over whelmed with sorrow, invoked the sun who supplied a new revelation, called the white or pure. The Sámaveda derives its name from its efficacy in removing sin (from the root Sho, to destroy). The prayers in this are intended to be chanted (Colebrooke I. 71). The Atharvaveda, consists of formulas obviating the effects of error, or untoward incident in the performance of a sacrifice, and is essentially different from the other three Vedas, which are sometimes mentioned without any notice of the fourth, from the difference in its use and purport. The derivation of the word is said to be, according to Monier Williams, from an obsolete word athar, fire, and hence a priest who has to do with fire and Soma; and Atharvan is also the name of the priest, represented as a Prajápati, who was the first to obtain fire and offer Soma, and the author of the Veda.
↩See n. 4, p. 174 of this volume.
↩A few variations occur in these names, some lists of the Puráṇas omitting a few and substituting others. Their general contents are given in Wilson's preface to his translation of the Vishṇu Puráṇa.
↩The text is here doubtful, but this reading seems to be tenable. The greater number of these are not procurable, and the names of only a few are specified in the least objectionable authorities. In the few instances known (I quote Wilson) they differ little in extent or subject from the Puráṇas themselves.
↩This name does not occur in either of Wilson's lists, which substitute Saura, the name given by Abul Fazl, as the original of the first, Sanatkumára. These lists are taken from the Deví Bhágavata and the Revá-Khánda, authorities of questionable weight. The former pretends to be considered the authentic Bhágavata which Wilson does not admit. The name of Bhágavata, he says, does not occur in any authentic list amongst the Upa-puráṇas, and it has been placed there to prove that there are two works so entitled, of which the Puráṇa is the Deví Bhágavata, and the Upa-puráṇa, the Sṛí Bhágavata. The true reading should be Bhárgava, the Puráṇa of Bhṛigu,: the Deví Bhágavata is not even an Upa-puráṇa.
↩Besides the evidence of precept from an extant revelation (sruti), another source of evidence is founded on the recollections (smṛiti) of the ancient sages. These recollections have come down by unbroken tradition, and are known under the title of Dharma-´Sástra, the institutes of law, civil and religious. This sacred code of law comprises a system of duties, religious and civil. The latter includes law, private and criminal, the forms of judicial procedure, rules of pleading, law of evidence, adverse titles, oaths, ordeal, &c. By the terms Sruti and Smṛiti, it is signified that the Veda has preserved the words of revelation, while the system of law records the sense expressed in other words. It has been promulgated by thirty-six ancient sages, named in three verses of the Padma Puráṇa. The Hindus revere these institutes as containing a system of sacred law, confirmed by the Veda itself in a text thus translated by Sir W. Jones.
“God, having created the four classes, had not yet completed his work; but in addition to it, lest the royal and military classes should become insupportable through their power and ferocity, he produced the transcendent body of laws: since law is the King of Kings, far more powerful and rigid than they. Nothing can be mightier than the law, by whose aid as by that of the mightiest monarch, even the weak may prevail over the strong.” V. Colebrooke, pp. 337-466.
↩These legislators are sometimes classed, according to Monier Williams, in three divisions under the three heads of Sáttvika, Rájasa and Támasa, according to the tendency of their writings.
↩Or Shatarzu. Doubtless the Shattrinśa a well-known work on law. The Shattrinśanmata was a collection of the opinions of 36 Munis of whom the names of all 18 mentioned in the above list, occur; and several of the second. In Janaka, and Játúkarṇya, Abul Fazl writes z for j.
↩For these following six doctrines of Phonetics, Prosody, Grammer, Etymology, Astronomy and Ceremonial, commonly called the Vedángas, see Max Müller's History of Sanskrit Literature, p. 113, ff. The first are considered requisite for reading the Veda, the two next for understanding it, and the last two for employing it at sacrifices ´Sikshá is derived from śak to be able and means a desire to know. The doctrine of the ´Sikshá was embodied in the A´raṇyakas, and perhaps the Bráhmaṇas. Kalpa or Ceremonial is the fifth and most complete Vedânga. The ceremonies mentioned by Abul Fazl, are described in the Gṛihya-Sútras and are briefly alluded to by Müller: p. 264.
↩In Hindi binjan, as Abul Fazl transliterates. I think it better to adhere, for the sake of uniformity, to the Sanskrit orthography throughout, rather than alternate from one to the other as the text does and not seldom with corrupt or unintelligible readings.
The third Vedanga is Vyákaṛaṇa or Grammar, represented by the Grammarians ending with Pâṇini, whose work however, superseded those of his predecessors to such an extent that little but their names and a few rules under their authority have come down to us, V. Hist. Sansk. Lit.
↩ This and the upadhmáníya spirants
are regarded by Whitney as pure grammatical
abstractions, devised like the
long l vowel in order to round out the
alphabet to greater symmetry. Their
use is to take the place of s or r before
a surd labial or guttural and their sound
is in the direction of the German c h. and
f. sounds; when written at all they are
commonly transliterated by
This is the anunásika sign
Properly the prosodial time of a short vowel.
↩These are the long i and the long l: the latter does not occur in a single genuine word in the language, and is added, says Whitney, for the sake of an artifical symmetry.
↩Abul Fazl writes rhasva for hrasva.
↩This is the fourth Vedánga as represented by the Nirukta of Yâska and applies to Vedic etymologies exclusively. Like Páṇini's Grammar where the science of Vyâkaraṇa took shape as a Vedánga, so Yáska was one of the last authors to embody the lexicography of Vedic terms in one work. It is important to distinguish his Nirukta, the text of which is usually called Nighaṇṭu, from his commentary of the Nirukta to which the term Nirukta alone is often applied. The Nirukta consists of three parts; the Naighaṇṭuka, the Naigama, and the Daivata, in five chapters, containing lists of synonyms, words and Divinities. Max Müller points out that the Greeks and Hindus alone of all nations have had independent conceptions of the sciences of Logic and Grammar, but they started from opposite points. The Greeks began with philosophy and endeavoured to adjust its terminology to the facts of language. The Hindus began with etymology and their generalisations never went beyond arrangement of grammatical forms, partly due to the sacred character of the Vedic hymns, wherein a mispronunciation might mar their religious effect. Thus the grammar of the latter has ended in a colossal pedantry, while that of the Greeks still influences modern culture throughout the civilised world. It is remarkable that while the Greeks were long in arriving at a complete nomenclature of the parts of speech, Plato knowing but two, the noun and the verb, and the preposition not occurring till the time of Aristarchus, the Hindus had early an exhaustive classification. V. Hist. Sansk. Lit. p. 160, ff.
↩Jyotisha is the last of the Vedángas. Its literature is scanty and is mainly represented by a small treatise representing the earliest stage of Hindu astronomy. Its practical object is not to teach this science but to convey such knowledge of the heavenly bodies as is necessary for fixing the auspicious times for Vedic sacrifices. It is in fact a sacred calendar, the moon being looked upon as the chief means of measuring time, a fact indicated by its etymology, its name being the same in Sanskrit, Greek and German and derived from a root that originally means to measure. The connection between the names of moon and month likewise indicates the existence of an ancient lunar chronology. Ibid.
↩Chandas or Metre is the second Vedánga and is represented by Pingalanága's Metric which treats of Prákrit as well as Sanskrit metres, and is not older than the Mahábháshya, the famous commentary on Páṇini. Ibid.
↩Lit, ‘a limb.’ It is said of Sváha the wife of Agni, the goddess presiding over burnt-offerings, that her body consists of the four Vedas, and that her limbs are the six Angas, or members of the Veda. The name does not imply the existence of six distinct books, but the admission of six subjects of study for the reading, understanding, and sacrificial employment of the Vedas. Ibid.
↩It contains eight departments: 1 ´Salya, surgery; 2. ´Sálákya, inquiry into diseases of the head and its organs: 3. Káya-chikitsá, treatment of diseases affecting the whole body: 4. Bhúta-vidya, treatment of diseases of the mind supposed to be produced by demoniacal influence: 5. Kaumára-bhṛitya, treatment of children: 6. Agada-tantra, doctrine of antidotes: 7. Rásáyana-tantra, doctrine of elixirs. 8. Vájíkaṛana-tantra, rules for increasing generative powers. Monier Williams. Sansk. Dict.
↩Regarded as an Upa-veda connected with the Yajur-veda, and ascribed to Viśvá-mitra; or, according to others, to Bhṛigu. Ibid.
↩According to Monier Williams, it is the science of polity, or moral and political government.
↩That is, the good and evil consequences in this life of human acts performed in previous births. This work of Viśveśvara-bhaṭṭa explains expiatory rites to be performed in cases of disease, supposed to be the punishment of offences committed in a previous state of existence, written in ´Slokas in the form of a dialogue between ´Sakuntalá Bharaṭa and ´Sátátapa-Bhṛigu. Monier Williams.
↩Probably on account of its sacred uses as in the ceremony of binding the Brahmanical thread and serving religious students for a couch or covering. The skin of the antelope is taken as a symbol of the Brahmachárin state, because the pupil wears a skin. Müller. Hist. Sanst. Lit. p. 409. The Brahmachárin is a Hindu religious student bound by vows of obedience and chastity.
↩Commonly Badrináth, a peak of the Himalayan range in Garhwál Dist. N. W. P. reaching to a height of 23,210 feet above the sea. Its glaciers are the source of the Alaknanda river. On one of its shoulders at an elevation of 10,400 feet, and 56 miles N. E. of ´Srinagar, is another shrine of Vishṇu bearing the same name. The existing temple is said to have been erected 800 years ago by ´Sankara Swámí who brought up the figure of the deity from the bottom of the river. Below the shrine is a sacred tank in which pilgrims bathe. The god is daily provided with food, and served on vessels of gold and silver. Immense numbers of pilgrims visit Badrináth annually, 50,000 persons having in some years attended the great festival. I. G.
↩The last chapter of Albirúni's Indica is occupied with the complicated explanation of the astrological calculations of the Hindus. I refer the curious reader to the tabular representations of the different planets, their aspects, influences, houses and indications, together with the tables of the Zodiacal signs and their dominants which are there given. The science has always been more profitable to the astrologer than to the dupe, and its truth subordinated to its emoluments. Jupiter, Venus and the moon are accounted the lucky planets, while Saturn, Mars, the Sun and the Dragon's head, though the latter is not in reality a star, unlucky. Mercury is variable and depends for its fortune on the planet with which it is combined. Sometimes two planets indicate the same thing, exercise the same influence and stand in the same relation to the event in question, in which case the preference is given to the larger. The friendship and enmity of the planets among each other, and the influence of their dominus domûs is of great importance, and at particular times their dominium, the time of which is computable, loses its original character. Many of Albirúni's terms are taken directly from the Greek.
↩“By what is a man impelled, O Várshṇeya!” says Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gítá, “when he commits sin even against his will, as if compelled by force?” “It is lust;” replies Kṛishṇa “it is wrath born from the ‘passion’ mode: know, that this all-devouring, all-defiling is here our foe. Knowledge is enveloped by this which is the eternal foe of the wise man … and is an insatiable flame.” Davies' Translation.
↩One of the Prajápatis or mind-born sons of Brahmá. He married thirteen of the daughters of Daksha, of whom the first was Aditi by whom he had the twelve A´dityas. See the Vishṇu Pur. Wilson. v. also Vol. II. 38.
↩This expiatory penance is continued increase and diminution of food by one mouthful during the dark and light fortnights of the moon, beginning with 15 at the full moon, to 0 at the new, and increasing in like manner. If this penance begins with the full moon it is called Pipilíká-madhya (having the middle thin like an ant): if with the new moon, Yava-madhya, having the middle thick like a barley-corn. Monier Williams, Sansk. Lex.
↩Sacred to Prajápati. It signifies the giving away of the whole of one's property before entering on the life of an ascetic. It is also a kind of fast lasting twelve days and likewise a form of marriage. Monier Williams.
↩ Abul Fazl writes
The Kuśa, Poa Cynosaroides; a sacrificial grass. A Bráhman when he reads the Vedas, must, according to Manu (Institutes, II. 75), sit on kuśa grass with the points to the east.
↩ The word in the text is incomplete,
probably
A variant reads thirty for this word.
↩This is an oblation to the gods made by casting clarified butter into the fire, accompanied by prayers and invocations.
↩Suturwan, lit. mule-like, and signifies a barren woman, or having but one child.
↩See, p. 285, Vol. II. The name signifies the family of Kṛishṇa (as identified with Vishṇu). It is supplementary to the great epic on the history and adventures of Kṛishṇa and his family. It contains 16,374 verses in three sections; 1. Harivanśa, a description of the creation of the world, and the history of the solar and lunar races; 2. Vishṇu-parvan, a biography of Kṛishṇa; 3. Bhavishya-parvan, an account of the future condition of the world and its corruptions. Monier Williams.
↩See p. 354, Vol. II.
↩One variant “with arrows.”
↩That is, the figure of Brahmá. See p. 163. The text has incorrectly separated these two words and carried ‘Garbha’ to the next paragraph.
↩Each of the Zodiacal signs has peculiar qualities, and these have been tabulated by Albirúni, from the Laghujátakam. The cardinal points of Hindu astrology, as he observes, are the planets, zodiacal signs and the houses. The nature of the aspect of every sign depends upon the nature of the ascendens which at a given moment rises above the horizon. The aspect between one sign and the fourth or eleventh following, is a fourth part of an aspect: that between one sign and the fifth or ninth following, is half an aspect; between the sixth and tenth, three quarters, and between a sign and the seventh following, a whole aspect. If a planet stand in signs which in relation to its rising, are the 10th, 11th, 12th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th signs, its nature changes for the better: if in other signs for the worse. The Houses indicate severally, various parts of the body, future events as to life, property, disposition, the influences of particular planets and Zodiacal signs, &c. Some of the signs are male and others female alternately from Aries to Pisces. The first half of each male sign is unlucky, as under the influence of the sun which produces males, while the second half is lucky under the influence of the moon which produces females. Women are indicated by the seventh House which is under the influence of Saturn, as Abul Fazl rightly observes.
↩In Hindi sur. The word signifies sound or musical tone, or air breathed through the nostrils.
↩Abul Fazl transliterates Chandr-nári and Sarúj-nári, as in Hindi. Náṛi, or properly, Náḍi, signifies in Sanskrit any tubular organ of the body, vein, &c.
↩A lunar day, or the thirtieth part of a whole lunation, the first of which is called pariwâ. See Vol. II, p. 17.
↩Two and a half ghaṛis = 60 minutes, and a pal is equal to 24 seconds.
↩ The
That is, a mad hyæna, which only in that state is supposed to attack a man.
↩The word signifies a bird in general, and has no precise application to any particular kind, though it is loosely rendered, kite, vulture, and sometimes a hen-sparrow.
↩Acridotheres tristis. The word is sár in the Persian, a starling. The Sturnus vulgaris, or common starling, is the teliyá mainá.
↩This word in the Pátañjala system signifies the isolation of the soul from the bondage of all worldly ties (Kaivalya). With the Jainas, Kevala signifies the pure unalloyed knowledge such as ascetics seek by penance The definition of Abul Fazl I can nowhere discover.
↩This is the name of the 17th Puráṇa relating to the birth of Gáruda, the mythical bird or vulture, half-man, half-bird, on which Vishṇu rides. He is the king of birds, descended from Kaśyapa and Vinatá, a daughter of Daksha, and a great enemy of serpents; a hatred inherited from his mother, who had quarrelled with her co-wife Kadru, the mother of serpents. He is represented as having the head, wings, and talons of an eagle, and the body and limbs of a man, and has many names and epithets. According to the Mahábhárata, his parents gave him liberty to devour wicked men, but he was recommended not to touch a Bráhman. Curiosity, or hunger, however, once prevailed, and he is said to have swallowed a Bráhman and his wife together; but his throat was so burnt in the act that he was glad to disgorge them. It is probably this circumstance which gave rise to the practice mentioned by Abul Fazl.
↩This term is thus explained in the Sáhitya Darpaṇa, by Viśvanátha Kavirája, to which work Abul Fazl is apparently indebted for his information. ‘The power by which in such an expression as “the impetuous Kalinga,” a word such as “Kalinga,” incompatible with the epithet ‘impetuous,’ if taken in its own sense of a particular country on the Coromandel coast, causes one to think not of the country, but the men connected therewith …. this power communicated to it, other than that which belongs to it naturally, is called Indication. Of this element in the drama there are 6 kinds. The treatise classes a word according to the three-fold accident of its function, as Expressive, Indicative and Suggestive. The expressed meaning is termed Váchya, conveyed to the understanding by the word's denotation (abhidha, literally, power or sense of a word) as a ‘cow,’ or ‘horse;’ the meaning indicated is held to be conveyed by the word's indication, lakshaná, as above explained: the meaning suggested (vyangya), is conveyed by the word's Suggestion (vyañjaná). “Indication” has a further eight-fold subdivision, into pure (suddha), and qualitative (gauṇa), which latter Abul Fazl classes separately, though acknowledging, later on, its inclusion by some authors under the second head. v. p. 16 and ff. of Pramadà Dása Mitra's translation of the above treatise.
↩This identical example occurs in the Sáhitya Darpaṇa.
↩This refers to Chapters IV and V. on what is called “Suggestive poetry,” which is regarded as its chief beauty. The Sanskrit term for this figurative style is Dhvani, and it is said by the author of the work of this name, “Like a beautiful woman with a single member ornamented, the sentence of a good poet shines with ‘Suggestion’ displayed by a single word.”—Sahitya Darpaṇa, p. 150.
↩Nauras in Hindi, as Abul Fazl transliterates. He also gives the following Hindi transliterations differing from the Sanskrit forms, Singár-rasa, Hási-rasa. For Bíbhatsa, he writes bibhichha. Rasa signifies ‘flavour’, from the verb ras, to taste or relish, and implies the emotions which give a zest to the representations of character. ´Sṛingara is from ´Sṛinga, a horn, and means the budding of love. S. D., p. 111.
↩A fourth division is mentioned in the S. D., viz., Atihasita, convulsion of laughter, where the limbs lose all control.
↩A tenth is sometimes added, vátsalya, paternal fondness; but according to others there are only eight rasas, the last two being omitted. These affections are supposed to lend to dramatic composition its relish and interest, and examples are culled from works that illustrate their force and beauty, as for instance, Bhava-bhúti's drama of the Víra-charita exemplifies the rasa of heroism, the Mahábhárata that of quietism or tranquillity, &c. These various sentiments are discussed and evidenced by instances from dramatic poetry, in the Sáhitya-darpaṇa.
↩The Sáhitya Darpaṇa gives 384 kinds, and alludes to other divisions too numerous to mention.
↩This appears to be an error. The Sáhitya Darpaṇa says that she ‘never goes out of the inner apartments, no longer laughs unconstrainedly, but practises every moment some bashful restraint. Little she speaks,” &c. Verses, taken from the marriage of Prabhávati by the author.
↩This sentence is, I think, connected with the one preceding, as I have rendered, and should not begin a new paragraph as in the text.
↩Utkaṇthitá is the more correct term in the heroic drama for a woman who longs after her absent lover or husband.
↩ I read
Abul Fazl transliterates Upati, and for Dhṛishta, Dhishta.
↩These four divisions are subdivided into sixteen. The cool or impudent lover is thus amusingly exemplified in the Sáhitya Darpaṇa ‘Perceiving her countenance crimson with passion, I went near intending to kiss her. She spurned me with her foot; but having humbly caught hold of it, I burst out laughing. O my friend, the anger of the fair-browed one, shedding tears, from her then being unable to do anything, prolongs, whenever thought of, the amusement of my mind,” p. 59.
↩Their characteristics are described with considerable detail and much unconscious humour in the Sáhitiyâ-darpaṇa, p. 56 and ff. Mitra's translation.
↩The doctrine of the vital airs has already preceded in the account of the schools of Hindu philosophy. The abdomen is supposed to be the seat of the fire which keeps up the heat of the body, and this fire is surrounded and retained in place by the airs called Samána. In the Pátañjala system, by the subdual of this air, the perfected Yogin appears illumined by the radiance of the flame which then escapes from the body. The same internal heat plays an important part in the production of the voice. According to Rájah Sir Sourindro Mohun Tagore, in his pamphlet, “The Twenty-two Musical ´Srutis of the Hindus,” when the animal soul wishes to speak, the mind acts on the abdominal fire which mixes with the vital air pervading the ligament known as Brahma Granthi, below the navel. This vital air thus expands, causing in the navel the ati súkshma náda, or the very minute sound; in the chest, the súkshma or the minute; in the throat, the pushta, or the developed; in the head, the apushta, or suppressed; and in the mouth, the kṛitrima, or artificial. Connected with or based upon these chords, are the twenty-two śrutis, or particles of sound sensible to the ear, which are essential to the formation of the Hindu Saptaka, or heptachord.
The voice is distinguished according to its Grámasthána or the appropriate organs concerned in its modulation, as mandra, madhya, and tára. The first is supposed to proceed from the chest, the second from the throat, and the third, or tára, from the head, varying in quality and pitch according to its place of origin: the throat-voice vibrating twice as rapidly as the chest-voice, and so on. In each of these places there are twenty-two śrutis, and as the compass of the voice is limited to within three octaves, the śrutis of the lowest are said to belong to the mandra-sthána, or mandra octave, those of the middle to the madhya, and those of the highest to the tára. Thus, the Hindu Saptaka, is divided into 22 intervals, or ´Srutis mathematically equal or unequal accordingly as the scales are harmonical or of equal temperament; in the former case, the series rises by geometrical progression, four śrutis being allotted to the major tones, three to the minor, and two to the semi-tones, indicating that a semi-tone is half a major tone, and the minor three quarters of the major tone, or one and a half times the semi-tone. Its serial progression obviously resembles to a great extent the enharmonic genus of the Greeks. That the śrutis are capable of exact musical expression, has been denied by Mr. C. D. Clarke in his well-known article in the Calcutta Review (No. CXVI. of 1874) in which he complains of the want of a precise definition of the term and of the vibration number of the intervals. He shows that the intervals between C and D and A and B, measured by the ratio of their vibration number, are harmonically the same, viz., as 1 to @9/8, while the interval between G and A is a little less, viz., 1 to @10/9; and taking the tone from C to D as 4 śrutis, from G to A as 3, and A to B as 2, he asks,—What is a ´Sruti?—His error lies in starting with the sa as C instead of as D, because by taking the former as the tonic of the Sharja gráma he turns a minor into a major interval and a semi-tone into a minor, it being of importance to remember that the notes of the Hindu Sharja scale when being termed of four or other number of śrutis, represent the intervals from their immediate lower notes and not the higher. The neglect of this condition has been the capital source of all the mistakes made in regard to the scales and the modes. Therefore the interval between G and A which he rightly says is a little less than between C and D, according to Western computation, is not so in the Sanskrit Sharja scale, but only in the Madhyama which latter tallies almost exactly with the English scale, assuming of course that D and not C is the note corresponding to sa. The Madhyama-gráma differs from the Sharja in the note pa only which is one śruti lower in the former than in the latter. Gandhára-gráma has ga and ni of four śrutis, ma, pa, dha, sa, three śrutis and ṛi of two. This was rarely or never employed. Sir S. M. Tagore maintains that the perfect modulation of these delicate intervals is neither impracticable nor difficult, and is constantly performed by practised singers. The point can be decided, not by the mathematician, but by a fine ear trained to this modulation. A nomenclature of Hindu technical terms, in the language of Western Music, is still a desideratum. It is strange that, though the śrutis form the basis of Hindu Music, Abul Fazl does not mention the term nor allude to them except by implication as vocal chords in the human frame.
The ´Srutis are personified as Nymphs, and have each their name, though varying in different writers. The 21 múrchhanás, which also play an important part in Hindu Music, are omitted by Abul Fazl. They have been confounded with the śrutis even by native musicians and were not correctly understood by Sir W. Jones. Mr. Patterson's erroneous view of them is their use to the learner, teaching him to rise and descend by tones and semi-tones and greater intervals. Captain Day (“Music of Southern India”) states at p. 23, that it is doubtful what these múrchhanás signified, and at p. 39, he defines them incorrectly. According to the ´Sangíta Ratnakára, (Ed. Vedantavágíśa and Sáradá Prasáda Ghósha, p. 61) the seven different orders in the succession of intervals in each of the three scales or grámas, caused by taking each note seriatim as the fundamental, in the ascending and descending series, were known as múrchhanás. Seven necessarily are formed in each scale and they are 21 in all. The first múrchhaná of the Sharja scale begins from sa of the middle heptachord the second from ni, and so on. The first of the madhyama scale begins from ma, (the initial indicative of the name, and the characteristic note) the second from ga, &c. The first of the Gándhára begins similarly from ga, the second from ṛi and so on. They are therefore simply such changes of scale as would be analogous to our diatonic series taken successively first from C, then D, E, F, &c. This is called ´Suddha, simple or unmixed, and omitting the Gándhára scale as little or never used, there are 7 múrchhanás in each of the two lower scales or 14 in both. By the introduction of a modification or ??ikṛiti-svara in the ni, the ga, and both ni and ga simultaneously, called respectively kákalí, santára and santára kákalí, three different sets or modifications of scale were furnished, each capable, like the simple form, of 14 expressions, making 56 múrchhanás in all. These Múrchhanás and not the rágas may be said to correspond to the Greek modes of the Æolian, Lydian, Ionic, Doric or Phrygian, so named according to the character of the sentiments they inspired. The effect of the different múrchhanás when played on the sitára, is very striking.
↩Pronounced Sharja. It means literally six-born; i. e., the fundamental from which the other six notes arise.
↩According to the Sangíta Darpaṇa the note is that of the Krauñcha, or heron (Ardea Jaculator).
↩ The text has eight, which must be
an error of
and the ´Srutis are allotted to the several notes, as follows: to Sa, ma and pa, four; to ṛi and dha, three; to ga and ni, two. The authority for Abul Fazl's division of the vocal chords among the notes of the octave I have not been able to trace. It appears to be taken from the idea of the division of the 22 strings. After dividing the heptachord into 22 parts, the ancients fixed the 7 notes in different places to construct the scales. Assuming the sound of the 4th string for sa, those of the 7th, 9th, 13th, 17th, 20th and 22nd were assigned to the remaining 6 notes and thus their principal or Sharja-gráma scale was formed.
↩The Sangíta Darpaṇa describes the sound as that made by the elephant when goaded by its mahout. These notes of birds and animals as they are termed, really signify the compass of their several calls and thus represent the number of śrutis of the scale-notes of which they become the equivalents.
↩ By the term naghma which I have
rendered system of intervals, a múrchhaná
must be meant. Each múrchhaná is
said to be sampúrṇa, or complete, when
all seven notes are employed, and asampúrṇa
when defective. When wanting
one it is called Sháḍava (
So I render “maḳám” and “shụbah” by which Abul Fazl signifies rágas and rágiṇís. Willard and Carey dispute the usual translation of rága by mode, and Sir S. M. Tagore confirms their dissent by his own; he says there is no corresponding term in English for rága. Carey calls rága a tune, which Willard disallows, but himself gives nothing better. He shows that various rágas and rágiṇís may be played on one adjustment of frets on the sitára, while the frets have to be shifted for others. These fret-adjustments permit only those tones to be sounded which are proper for the mode to which the frets have been transferred and each adjustment, called ṭháṭh, or a frame-work, he would style ‘mode.’ Several rágiṇís, by a varied order of succession, may be adapted to the same ṭháṭh, but they must belong to it and cannot be played but on their proper ṭháṭh which determines the relative distances of the sounds of the heptachord, while the rága disposes their succession and marks their principal effect. From an able article in the Cal. Rev., CXXXVII. of 1879, by Sárada Prasáda Ghósha, the learned co-editor of the Sangíta Ratnakára, to which I am already indebted for the substance of this information on the múrchhanás and tánas, I borrow the following explanation of the rága. It is defined as a musical composition consisting of not less than five notes of a MÚRCHHANÁ (mark this term) in accordance with certain rules with a view to a particular æsthetic effect. The chief rules are that a note is assumed with which the Rága begins. This is called graha; another with which it must invariably end, called nyása; a third, which is the tonic or predominant, repeated oftener than the others, and perhaps more noticeable also in the time, and called anśa or bádí: a fourth, which is 9 or 13 śrutis above or below the bádí, used almost as frequently and termed sambádí. A rága differs from another consisting of notes of a different múrchhaná, when a bádí, sambádí or gráha, &c., in the one is not the same in the other. Other distinctions and subtleties of interchange and mutilations of the scale produce countless varieties of the rága. It will be thus seen that the rága depends chiefly on its múrchhaná which can produce only rágas in a certain setting, the change of the múrchhaná, bádí and sambádí altering the class of the rága.
↩The Sangíta Darpaṇa names the particular mouths from which the Rágas respectively issued. They are represented as minor deities wedded to their five Rágiṇís or variations, and the rest of this chapter in the above work treats of them and their pictorial representations symbolic of their characters and seasons. Sir W. Jones considers that the fancy of Shakspeare and the pencil of Albano might have been finely employed in giving speech and form to these aërial beings. Were they trammelled by the traditional types of the Sangíta Darpaṇa, the genius of both would, in my opinion, have failed to raise them to any standard of beauty that Western ideas could appreciate or recognise.
↩I take the following variants from the Sangíta Darpaṇa,—Trivaṇá, Kedárá, and Pahári.
↩Varáti.
↩Gurj arí.
↩Reva.
↩Guṇakrí.
↩ This is a blunder through ignorance of
Sanskrit from which Abul Fazl's pandits
should have saved him. This list is taken
from Hanumán who gives but five Rágiṇís
in the exact order of the names in
Abul Fazl and concludes the fifth in the
S. D., with the śloka
Vibhasaśvá.
↩Karnáṭi.
↩Paṭamanjari.
↩Savérí.
↩Kauśiká.
↩Harsṛingára.
↩Kalyání.
↩Abhírí.
↩Náṭiká.
↩Sálangí.
↩Naṭa Hambhírá.
↩In the S. D. the term mála is explained as the garland of the heads of his enemies worn by this Rága in his symbolic representation. His Rágiṇís are Ṭoḍí, Kambhávalí, Gaurí, Guṇakrí and Kakubhá. Those of Hindola are Velavalí, Rámakalí, Deśa, Patamanjari and Lalitá. Those of Dípaka are Kedarí, Kánara, Deśí, Kamodí and Náṭaka.
↩According to Capt. Day (“The Music and Musical Instruments of Southern India,” Chap. VIII), from early times Tanjore has been the chief seat of Music in Southern India, and most of the chief Karnâtik musicians have either lived there or were educated in the Tanjore School.
↩See p. 611. n. Vol. I. The fame of the Gwalior School of Music dates from the reign of this prince. Bakshú continued at the court of Bikramájít, the son of Mán Singh, and after his death entered the service of Rájá Kírat of Kálinjar, whence he was invited to the court of Gujarát. Blochmann, who does not state his authority, gives the name of the Gujarát prince as Sulṭán Bahádur who reigned from 1526 to 1536. He was succeeded by Sulṭán Maḥmúd in the latter year. The names Macchu and Bhanu have several variants in the notes to the text. They do not appear in Blochmann's list of musicians at p. 612. Bayley in his “History of Gujarát,” speaks of a minstrel called Bacchu attached to Sulṭán Bahádur's court, who was taken before Humáyún on the capture of Mandu in 1535. The Emperor had given orders for a general massacre, but being told that this musician had not his equal in Hindustan, he was directed to sing and so charmed the royal ear, that he was given a dress of honour and attached to the court. He subsequently fled to Sulṭán Bahádur who was so rejoiced at his return that he declared his every wish fulfilled and sorrow banished from his heart. Bayley notes that the name is variously written and that it seems to be either Bacchu or Chittú. Willard mentions the following as the most renowned of the Náyaks or masters; Gopál, a native of the Dekhan who flourished under Sulṭán Aláu'ddín; his contemporary Amír Khusrau of Delhi; Sulṭán Hosain Sharḳi of Jounpúr; Rájá Mán Singh of Gwalior, and “Byjoo, Bhoonoo, Pandvee, Buksoo and Lohung. The four following lived at the time of Rájáh Mán of Gualiar,— Jurjoo, Bhugwan, Dhoondhee and Daloo.” Among these names, the spelling of which I leave unaltered, Bhoonoo and Buksoo are evidently the two mentioned in the text. His list contains other names which I need not here record.
↩Willard calls the Dhurpad the heroic song of Hindustan, the subject being frequently the recital of the memorable actions of their heroes, and also treating of love and even of trifling and frivolous topics. Its origin he ascribes to Rájá Mán Singh whom he calls the father of Dhurpad singers. He describes it as having four tuks or strains: more correctly, rhythmic cadences or lines as A´bul Fazl expresses it. They are severally named like the divisions of the alápa in Sir S. M. Tagore's “Six Principal Ragas,” p. 39. Two of these Dhurpads are given in the Brajbihár of Naráyan Swámi, one being in the Sárang mode. Specimens of others will be found in the Súr Ságar of Súr Dás, a contemporary of Akbar. Chind in the text I suspect to be an error for Chhand, (Sansk. Chhandas) a sacred hymn and also a musical measure; Dhruva signifies the introductory stanza or recurring verse of a poem or song repeated as a refrain. Chuṭkala is a jest or pleasantry and these songs resemble probably the ancient Fescennine verses designed to catch the coarse and indelicate humour of the mob. The Bishan-pad according to Willard, was introduced by the blind (súr) poet and musician Súr Das. His name occurs in Blochmann's list, p. 617, I. Of Sámit and Tatár I find no mention. Some of these singers came from Mashhad, Tabríz, Kashmír, and from beyond the Oxus.
↩By Willard, Zikri, a much more probable name, as they are on the subject of morality. This class of religious song was introduced into Hindustan by Kazi Maḥmúd. V. Willard's treatise on “The Music of Hindustan.”
↩Probably to change the ominous name, Kuráí, signifying stocks for the feet, and Sughrái, beauty or grace.
↩Sir S. M. Tagore explains in his ‘Six Principal Rágas,” that it is a practice with singers, before commencing a song, to develop the character of the rága by means of gamakas, and tánas. This is called alápa in which the notes peculiar to the rága are sung as a prelude to show its character. There is no fixed rule as to the time, but it should be in general keeping with the whole movement. Willard calls it a rhapsodical embellishment which after going through a variety of ad libitum passages, rejoins the melody without interfering with it, the musical accompaniment keeping time throughout,—these passages are not essential to the melody but introduced as grace notes, according to the fancy of the singer, but restricted to the characteristic notes of the melody and to its time. On account of the brevity of the melodies in general, a singer of pretensions does not go through the song more than once in its simple form, but on its repetition, introduces these embellishments to avert monotony. v. Capt. Day's “Music of Southern India,” p. 41.
↩Pada technically is a sentence formed of words having a meaning. Tena, meaningless words used by singers to exhibit the air alone, unaccompanied by words. The six members of the Gita may be thus briefly exemplified:—
1st (Svara), sa, ga, ṛi, sa.
2nd (Viruda), Thou art my God.
3rd (Pada), I look to thee.
4th (Tena), Tena, na, te, na.
5th (Páta), Dha, Dhin, Kath, Thege.
6th (Tála), beats by hand at equal intervals.
The sounds commonly sung are dha kath, thege, dhrigra, ghena, trikat, &c., imitative of the resonance of the instrument, as analogous sounds might be employed in English. I must here once more express my obligation to the courteous aid of Bábu Sáradá Prasáda Ghósha whose knowledge of the theory of Western, and both the theory and practice of Hindu music has been at my service both in his writings and his practical explanation of them on the instrument of which he seems a master.
↩Abul Fazl writes, medaní and ánadani. I follow the S. D. Sir S. M. Tagore makes tála synonymous with chhandas, or metre, and guiding its movement. The beat conforms to the variety of the metre, upon the rhythmic feet of which is based, as with the Greeks, their musical measure. Willard limits the variety of beats now practised to ninety-two, the musical values of which he tabulates. Tála, the rhythm, is not to be confounded with laya, musical time properly so called, divided into slow (vilambita), moderate (madhya), and quick, (druta), with which the beats accord. The bars are measured by mátras, or prosodial quantity of vowels (v. p. 223) of which the divisions are explained by Sir S. M. Tagore in his work on the Rágas, p. 44, ff. Cf. Capt. Day's “Music of Southern India,” Chaps. II and IV.
↩