Akbar-nāmah - The Akbarnāma of Abū Fazl, Volume 1

The Book of Akbar

Text ID: 000701021 • View Author
CHAPTER III.
DESCRIPTION OF THE AUSPICIOUS HOROSCOPE WHICH WAS CAST AT THE
TIME OF THE GLORIOUS BIRTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ALTITUDES OF THE GREEK ASTROLABE.
VERSE.

Approach heaven-weighing observer,
Regard with understanding the connexion of the spheres,
Look at the beautiful horoscope of the Lord of conjunction,69a
Behold the auspicious charter of two worlds,
Contemplate this glorious rescript,
Fortune upon fortune, light upon light.

When the victory-grasping standards were leaving the fort of Amarkōṭ, Maulānā Cānd, the astrologer, who was possessed of great acuteness and thorough dexterity in the science of the astrolabe, in the scrutinizing of astronomical tables, the construction of almanacs, and the interpretations of the stars,—was deputed to be in attendance at the portals of the cupola of chastity (Miryam Makānī, Akbar's mother), in order that he might observe the happy time and ascertain exactly the period of birth. He69b reported in writing to the exalted camp that, according to altitudes taken by the Greek astrolabe, and by calculations based on the Gurgānī tables (Canon of Ulugh Beg)70a the figure of the nativity was as follows:—

FIGURE70b
I.
AKBAR'S HOROSCOPE.

Although Virgo is a Bicorporal71a Sign, partly Fixed and partly Tropical, yet in this frontispiece of felicity, the fixity of the horoscope is, on close observation and careful consideration, indicated by two circumstances. One is that the cusp72a of the Ascendant is 7°,72b and so belongs to the first third72c (decanate) of the Sign which, astrologers are agreed, denotes fixity. The other is that Virgo is an earthy72d Sign, and fixity72e is the property of the earthy element. These are two proofs of the fixity of the throne of sovereignty and of the stability of the cushion (masnad) of the Khilāfat. Moreover, Mercury, the Lord of the Ascendant, is in this glorious nativity posited by the Greater Fortune,72f for Jupiter, i.e., the Greater Fortune, is beside him, and Mercury is a planet who makes good luck, better luck. Venus, the Lesser Fortune, is in Mercury's72g House (Virgo) and Mercury, in hers, viz., Libra.72h He signifies wisdom, knowledge, dexterity and ingenuity, and both by equal distribution of (mundane) Houses and by Sign, he is in the Second House which is connected73a with the means of livelihood and the support of life. He bestows on the Native73b amplitude of perfect reason and understanding, so that he adorns the universe with the light of intellect in the affairs of this life and the next, and opens knots, whether spiritual or temporal, with the very finger-tips of his understanding.73c As Venus who is renowned for auspiciousness and prosperity and who signifies joy and pleasure,—is in this horoscope, (i.e., the Ascendant or First House) she keeps ever ready the things of joy and gladness and the materials of magnificence and glory. It is a remarkable circumstance that whilst the lord of the Ascendant (Mercury) is in the House of wealth (the Second), the lord of the House of wealth (Venus)74a is in the Ascendant (the First or House of Life.) Thus the two together signify personal and circumstantial felicity, and bestow a life of power and pleasure. Jupiter—the Greater Fortune—who signifies justice, integrity, magnanimity, firmness of soul and civilization,74b is also in the Second House and, as he is in sextile74c to the Fourth House which is that of finality, he keeps perfection of power and pleasure closely associated with the glorious condition of his Majesty, down to the very end. The double-natured (dipsychus) Mercury has acquired extreme auspiciousness, by reason of his vicinity to the Greater Fortune, and has heaped felicity upon felicity. He signifies that the Native will, by greatness of genius and loftiness of development, become the apex of mankind, and he indicates assemblages of the masters of understanding and reason and of the lords of perception and penetration. The philosophers of the age and sages of every sect will attend the wisdom-protecting Court, and ingenious wits of all countries will forsake their native lands, and donning the pilgrim's garb, will circumambulate his sublime threshold. Whatever the ray of illumination shall have darted into his inspired soul, will be consonant with reason and reality. Having opened the gates of justice and equity to all mankind, he will in every action hold fast by the principles of rectitude and protection (diyānat u ṣiyānat). He will apply his genius to founding magnificent buildings such as have rarely been constructed in the times of former princes, and in those choice mansions he will pass his time in varieties of joys and happinesses and in all manner of ease and independence.

Among remarkable74d circumstances we have this,—that Venus is in the House of Mercury and Mercury in the House of Venus. Thus three happy influences are combined;—viz., 1°. the happy influence of Jupiter,—2°. the happy influence of Venus;—3°. the happy influence which Mercury has imbibed from the fortunate twain. This is something very uncommon.

The Great Light (the Sun), the benefactor of the universe and moderator75a of the affairs of mortals, and the special bestower of glory, power, pomp and prestige is in the Third House and in a Fixed Sign (Scorpio), signifying the grant of dignity, glory, greatuess and magnificence. As he has come out of his fall75b and his face is set toward his exaltation, he has made the Native's glory increase, day by day, and as he is in aspect75c to the Ninth House (Taurus) which is that of travel, the standards75d of victory and conquest will always be upraised on the march,75e while he himself protects mankind from the confusions and calamities of the age and is the light-giver of the world.

As the Third House which is that of kindred, is Scorpio, it is significant of Scorpion-kinsmen.76a (◌ aqārib-i-‘aqārib.) Saturn there sends those alien relatives (distant-near ones) by calamities and disasters, to the nethermost hell of destruction and perdition.

The Fourth angle76b is Sagittarius and is the House of the final issue of things. Jupiter, its lord, is in sextile to it and is contiguous76c to the ameliorated Mercury,76d and in his own term76e and triplicity.76f Whatever the Native deigns to undertake, will be accomplished with the greatest ease, and the terminations of his works will be prosperous.

The Fifth House is that of offspring and is Capricornus, a sign indicative of many77a children. Mars, the soldier's planet, is there and is a kadkhudā77b of the Ascendant which is the centre77c of the laws of life. It is a glorious thing that this warlike planet is in his House of exaltation, and by face,77d triplicity,78a darijān,78b ādarjān78c and dodecatemorion78d has endowed the Native with long life, and has given him the enjoyment of many sons and grandsons. His sons, too, will be fortunate and capable. He will also have world-traversing, victorious soldiers. It is a beautiful coincidence that in the horoscope of the Lord of Conjunction, (Timur) Mars is in the Fifth House, as mentioned in the Ẓafarnāma.78e Experienced philosophers have laid stress on the power of Mars in the horoscopes of princes. The present powerful and holy horoscope excels that of the Lord of Conjunction in that this majestic planet is in his House of exaltation (Capricornus) and has the other dignities mentioned above. This signifies glory and greatness, lofty rank, victory and dominion, and that yet his glory will be greater and better from his youth upwards. The Moon who is the intermediary79a between the celestial influences and the terrestrial elements, having come as an increaser79b of light, points the way to daily increasing dominion.

She is also the hyleg, which is the tabernacle of the soul and guardian of the body, and is in the Fifth House. As she is separating (munṣarif) from Mars and is in trine to Venus, she is a cause of continual health, soundness of constitution and bodily strength.

The Sixth House is Aquarius and signifies armies. Saturn is the dominant and he is in the Third House which is that of allies and helpers. The Dragon's Head (Rās80a or Anabibazon) is there and signifies soldiers of loyal and devoted clans.

The Seventh angle (i.e., the Descendant or west angle) is Pisces at the seventh degree, which is the term80b of Venus and belongs to her triplicity80c and ādarjān.80d She gives80e chaste veiled ones who are constant in pleasing service and respects; and she makes the Native happy and prosperous by their good offices.

The Eighth House is Aries; Mars is its lord and his benefic influences have already been described. He is in trine to the Ascendant and signifies the Divine protection80f in positions of fear and hidden dangers.

The Ninth House (Taurus) is that of travel. As its regent (Venus) is posited in the Ascendant—Virgo, she holds in readiness, tranquillity and pleasure in distant journies and makes them a cause of increase of territory.

The Part of Fortuno (Pars Fortunae)81a is in the Tenth angle which is that of dominion and prosperity (iqbāl). Its lord, the auspicious Mercury, is in trine to it. As the Greater Fortune (Jupiter) is also in trine to it, this signifies majestic sovereignty, perfect reason and justice, and brings the world's treasures into the powerful grasp of the Native.

The Eleventh House (Cancer) is that of Hope. Its lord is the crescent Moon. She is in the Fifth House of the horoscope, and as she is in trine to the Ascendant, she is a cause of safety and of the attainment of desires.

The Twelfth House (Leo) is that of enemies. The Dragon's Tail81b (Ẕanab) being posited in it, makes the enemies of eternal fortune downcast and contemptible. It turns every wretch who averts his face from the altar of obedience, topsyturvy into the wilderness of annihilation. Its lord, the Sun, being posited in the Third House, viz., that of allies and helpers, will bring many opponents to repentance and the path of submission and devotion. A wonderful thing in this horoscope is that the Tenth House, that of dominion and sovereignty, is in Gemini of which the lord of the Ascendant, (Mercury) is the regent. It is established that every lord of the Ascendant desires to promote his own signification (or perhaps, what is committed to him), but that he may be frustrated by obstacles to his power. Now in this auspicious horoscope, Mercury's House is also that of dominion and sovereignty. Seeing that dominion (daulat) is posited in his own (Mercury's) House, why should he (Mercury) hold back from carrying out his own signification (or, from what has been committed to him)?

NOTE I. (from page 78.)

◌ darījān. Vullers describes this as an astrological rule according to which a Sign is divided into three parts and a planet assigned to each. The original Persian form is ◌ darīgān. It is the dreshkāna or drekkāna of the Hindus. Albīrūnī (II. 222) says, “Further, there are the triangles, called drekkāna. There is no use in enlarging on them, as they are simply identical with the so-called draijānat of our system.” Unfortunately Albīrūnī did not foresee a time when Arabian and Persian astrology would be forgotten and his Canon Masudicus a sealed book. Sachau speaks of it (there are four copies in Europe and one in the Mullā Fīrōz Library at Bombay) as awaiting the combination of two editors a scholar and an astronomer, but probably, a third, an astrologer, would also be required. Colebrooke says (Asiatic Researches IX. 367) that the dreshkāna answer to the decāni of European astrologers. The decāni also correspond to the wajh of Arabian astrologers and according to the Lucknow editor of the Akbarnāma, are called by Hindus ṣūrat, face. Decanus, according to Scaliger's notes on Manilius, (329) comes from the Latin and not from the Greek. The Luck. ed. gives an explanation of the word darījān (27) and the corresponding term drekkāna is explained in Bengali books on astrology. It seems that every sign is divided into three parts each of 10°, that the planet who presides over the sign, is lord of the first 10°, that the next 10° are ruled by the planet who presides over the Fifth Sign from that under division, and that the third 10° or drekkāna is ruled by the planet presiding over the Ninth Sign from that under division.

(With reference to the “triangles” in the above quotation from Sachau, it should be observed that the word in the original is ◌ alaṯlāṯ, the plural of ṯāliṯ and should be translated thirds and not triangles. The drekkāna are not triangles but ten degrees or thirds of a Sign.)

NOTE II. (from page 78.)

◌ ādarjān. This word puzzled me for a long time. It is not to be found in the dictionaries except under the form ◌ or ◌. They however do not explain even this word; saying only that it means “certain figures and mysteries in astrology.” (See Vullers 78 and Steingass.) The Lucknow editor (27) says that ādarjān is the same as wabāl, and he repeats this explanation at page 30. He there says also that ādarjān, is a fortitude or dignity superior to that of the darījān, but inferior to that of the wajh face. It is clear therefore that it cannot bear the same meaning as wabāl which is a debility and corresponds to the English detriment. Perhaps the editor connected it with auj, apsis or exaltation. Another explanation was sent me from India, to the effect that when two planets were in the same muṯallaṯat or triplicity, each was said to be the ādarjān or partner of the other. If this were so, the word might be connected with the Arabic ◌ or ◌ idraj or idrāj, a fold or folding; but I now believe this explanation is quite incorrect. The fact seems to be that ādarjān or ādarajān is merely a form of the word darījān and is probably nothing but that word with the Arabic article al prefixed. The word occurs in the Mafātīḥu-l-‘ulūm (ed. Vloten, Leyden 1895, 226) under the forms aldahaj and aldaraj and is there explained as synonymous with wajh, ṣūrat and dārījān. The editor says it is the same as the Greek ◌. That this explanation is correct appears from the Latin translation of an early treatise on Astrology by an Eastern writer, commonly known as Alchabitius, but whose real name was ‘Abdu-l-‘azīz ibn ‘Uṯmān Alqabīsī and who, according to the Biographie Universelle lived in the 10th century. He wrote a Madkhal or Introduction to Astrology which was translated into Latin by Johannis Hispalensis and was several times reprinted. Its Arabic title is given in Ḥājī Khalfa's Lexicon (V. 473) as Madkhal fī ‘ilm-al-nujūm. In the Differentia Quarta (Cap. IV. The pages are not separately numbered, but this chapter is a few pages after dd4.) of this work, there is the following passage:—

“Modus inveniendi dominum decani.”

“Et ex hoc adorogen, hoc est ut dividas ascendens in tres partes; et sit omnis divisio 10 graduum; dabisque divisionem primam domino ascendentis; et secundam domino quinti signi ab eo; et tertium domino noni; nam ascendens, 5, et 9 una semper sunt triplicitas. Verbi gratiâ, ab initio Arietis usque in decimum gradum ejus est dorogen i. (i.e.) decanus est Martis. Et si fuerit ex 10 gradu usque 20 gradum erit ejus dorongen sol, dominus Leonis. Et si fuerit 20 usque in finem ejus erit dorongen Jupiter, dominus Sagittarii.”

The same volume contains a commentary on Alchabitius by John of Saxony and at M.M. 3, we have these words, “Et ex hoc adoringen. Hic docet invenire decanum.” This commentary, it seems, was written in 1331, though apparently not printed till 1485.

The book is in the British Museum, and there is another copy of Alchabitius and of John of Saxony's Commentary which was printed at Venice in 1521. In this, too, we have the expression, “Et ex hoc adorogen” and “et ex hoc adorogen.” This is the passage according to the Venetian editions of 1485 and 1521. In another edition, printed at Bologna in 1473 (B.M. press-mark 8610 d. 10.) we have the form abdorungen, but otherwise the wording is the same. It begins, “Et ex hoc abdorungen” and lower down has the important expression “ejus abdorungen, id est, decanus, est Mars.” The occurrence of the letter b certainly seems to favour the supposition that the first syllable is merely the Arabic article, the b being a misprint for l. As for the expression et ex hoc, the explanation is that the Differentia Quarta is a glossary of astrological terms and that et ex hoc seems a literal rendering of the Arabic ◌ wa-minhu. The difficulty arising from A.F.'s using the word as if it were of different meaning. from darījān, his speaking, for instance, both of the darījān and ādarjān in the same passage.

This is due, I think, to the fact that each House of a horoscope consists of about 30° i.e., of three decanates or darījāns. Hence, in mentioning the dignities or properties of a House, instead of saying darījān and darījān or using the word wajh (face) three times over, he varies the expression for the sake of euphony. What the exact etymology of the word ādarjān or darījān is, I am unable to say. The varieties of spelling lead one to suppose it a foreign word. It is clear from Alchabitius, that ādarjān or ādarajān is the proper spelling, and that the form aradjān of the Bādshāhnāma and the Dictionaries is incorrect.

Most probably the word comes from the Greek ◌, a triangle. I do not think it can come from ◌, for I do not see how the letter r came to be inserted. It appears, from Sachau's Albīrūnī, that the word which in our dictionaries is spelled darījān is in Arabic draijān. I have suggested above that the first syllable or letter of ādarjān is the Arabic article, but there may be another explanation. As Persian does not admit of conjunct consonants at the beginning of words, it is possible that when the word was borrowed from the Arabic or the Greek, the dr or the tr of the Greek necessitated either a prosthetic or a medial vowel. Thus trīgonon or draijān became in Persian, either adrajān or darījān. In a similar manner we have both Iskandar and Sekandar as transliterations of Alexander and dirham for the Greek drachme, Firangi for Frank, etc. But if ādarjān comes from trigonon and not from decānus, it must still be acknowledged that it came to have the same meaning as decanate in English or drekkāna in Sanscrit, and is stated by Alchabitius to be the equivalent of decānus.

If anything were necessary to prove that the word ādarjān is identical in meaning with wajh, facies, I think it is furnished by the fact that Haly, (i.e., Abu-l-ḥasan ‘Alī ibn Abī-'l Rajāl al-Shaibānī) in his elaborate work on astrology, says nothing about darījān or ādarjān, though he has a chapter De Faciebus or, (as the Arabic has it) Fi-l-wujūh.

Moreover Guido Bonatus has this passage (ed. Basle 1550 825) De dorungez non dico hic (the passage occurs in a chapter on the triplicities) aliquid quoniam videtur spectare ad considerationem facierum, de quibus latius ac sufficienter dictum est superius in Tractatu primo in cap. ed Faciebus.

Scaliger has yet another spelling of darījān; he calls it dorogen and says the Arabs apply the term to the dodecatemoria. (Notes on Manilius 179 1.38.) This seems to be a mistake.

CHAPTER IV.
SCHEME OF THE SKY-ADORNING NATIVITY OF HIS MAJESTY, THE KING OF
KINGS; AND SUMMARY OF THE STELLAR INFLUENCES,85a
ACCORDING TO
THE METHODS OF THE ASTROLOGERS OF INDIA.85b

By the calculations of the Indian astrologers, his Majesty's auspicious horoscope falls under Leo which is a Fixed Sign and is significant of perfect supremacy, victory, energy and superiority. The Sun, which takes more note85c of kings than of all the other objects in the universe, is the dominant, and this is a clear indication that the Native will be victorious and paramount over famous sovereigns and mighty rulers.

The pillars of his sovereignty and government will gain stability and strength, day by day, and the regulations of his exaltation and glory will be carried out firmly and with permanence. The rays85d of his wrath will85e consume the fore-arms85f of stiff-necked, evil-disposed ones, and the beat of his war-drums will turn to water the courage of rank-breaking, tiger-hearted men.

The scheme of the holy nativity is hereby set down in accordance with the writing of the foremost of Indian astrologers, the Jotik86a Rai who was one of the servants of the royal threshold.

FIGURE II.

Notwithstanding86b the perfect simplicity and unceremoniousness of his Majesty, the King of Kings, such rays of glory and power87a stream from the forehead of his might as to indicate that the Indian astrologers are not far from truth when they assert that his noble horoscope belongs to Leo. In their books of stellar influences, it is laid down that the Native of this Ascendant is wealthy, victorious over enemies, forgiving towards offenders, ruling according to just and equal laws, and accomplishing his purposes by force of his own reason and by firmness in his own opinions. He will be fond of travel87b and will reap benefit from it. And he is lord of excellent and obedient children. The meeting87c of Jupiter and Venus in the Second House makes the Native a guide in various arts and sciences.

As the Greater Fortune (Jupiter) is in the House of Mercury, he (the Native) will be endowed with beauty of form, proportional admixture of the elements, gravity of speech, social graces, lofty understanding, and sublime apprehension in theology and divine worship, and will be adorned with well-doing, and with ability to accomplish everything in accordance with propriety.

Venus in Virgo, takes charge of the adornment of virtuous veiled ones and provides for the increase of beauty87d and elegance. As the Sun is in the Third House,87e he (the Native) will accomplish whatever great undertaking he desires to compass, without reference to any other person. He will be powerful and his brethren will not attain to him. Indeed the star of the brothers' horoscope is occulted.87f Men will be united and agreed in love of him. As Mercury is in the Third House, he (the Native) will be talented, versed in business, and disliking idleness, a subduer of difficulties, and a slayer of enemies (mashaqqat-kash u dushman-kush). His acute thoughts will revel in theology and other philosophies and will attain the rank of ecstacy. And as (Mercury) is in Libra, he will be famed throughout the world, and his good deeds will be widely known. He will be world-conquering and world-ruling for lengthened periods of time, and excellent contrivances and ingenious plans are indicated. As Saturn is in the Third House, he (the Native) will enjoy repose and much tranquility, and will have attached servants innumerable, but he will act according to his own personal courage and his own ripe reason. As (Saturn) is in Libra, and in exaltation,88a he (the Native) will be master of the treasures of the world, and as Saturn is under the shade of the venerable, world-warming Sun, his boundless treasures will last for lengthened periods and will remain unaffected by prolonged usage of them.

He will make delightful journeys with success and accomplishment of his objects. And there will not be a greater than he upon earth. Mighty88b black beasts (elephants) will await at his gate. As he grows in years, his power will increase, and he will, without trouble or pains, acquire great armies and perfect dominion and glory. His power and his felicity will be lasting, for there is no slower88c planet than Saturn, and among his gifts are extent of fortune, permanence of sovereignty, and length of days. The Sun, Saturn and Mercury are in one Sign. He will, therefore, be friend-cherishing, foe-subduing, well knowing the laws of amity and inimity. Mars being in Sagittarius, mankind will glorify him. For Mars is in the triplicity88d of the ascendant; and in the house of his friend.88e This powerful friend is the Greater Fortune and puts away the sorrows and the apprehensions of the nations. And he will be happy and joyful. And by power visible and invisible, essential and accidental, he becomes Great of the Great and King of Kings. The glory of his renown embraces the world and the fame of his majesty extends from shore to shore. Many princes and rulers will be subject to him, and, being afraid of him, will be obedient and submissive. And as Mars is in the House of Jupiter and the Sun is in sextile to him, the princes throughout the world will place their heads on the line of his command and make the dust of his threshold the adoration-spot of their obedience. The Moon is in the Sixth House; he may have powerful enemies but they will not reach him, nor be able to withstand the scorching lightning of his wrath and might, and they will always endeavour to gain his friendship so that by borrowing89a the lights of his alliance, they may be in safety from evil.

As the Moon's detriment89b is in Capricorn, the weakness of his enemies is signified. And there comes a sweet reasonableness to the Native which enables him to decide disputes according to equity and the real merits of the cases.

And having examined contradictory faiths, and different dispositions, he guides every sect in the way of good works. His desire is that men should leave the hollow of imitative routine, and emerge into the straight highway of inquiry. And as Jupiter is in aspect towards him,89c the royal power and might will be beyond calculation. He will become possessed of tractable children and, as Venus is in aspect, high-minded chaste ones of excellent actions will serve him for long periods of life and he89d will have obedient and amiable children.

SUNDRY RULES OF INDIAN ASTROLOGY.

There are certain principles, too, to be found in the books of Indian philosophers which prove the grandeur of this holy nativity. If a planet occupy the twelfth (dodecatemorion) of the Moon, the Native will have pleasure throughout a long life, and the dust of sickness will hardly touch the garment-hem of his health and, while in the fullness of his powers, and having become a manifestation of planetary dignities90a and having attained the acme of felicity,— he will obtain a great kingdom, and will have long life and abundant blessings, and will be joyful in sublime stations and lofty palaces. Now, as in this horoscope Mars occupies the dodecatemorion of the Moon, all these things are fully proved and established. He will be lord of victorious armies, and be line-breaking and foe-scattering on the battle-fields, and everyone on whom the glance of his wrath shall fall, will be melted by his terrible majesty. And if an auspicious planet be in the dodecatemorion of the Sun, the honoured Native will be a mild prince, eloquent and wise, firm and fortunate. And in emergencies when the brave in battle and men of men may hesitate, the owner of these happy omens will never swerve, but will keep a steady foot on the skirt of fortitude and great-heartedness, and the trace90b of doubt and the smallest vestige of change will not reach the court of his circumspection. Now in this holy horoscope, the meeting90c of the two Fortunes in the dodecatemorion shows abundant auspiciousness. If the Sun be lord of the Ascendant, and be in the Third House, the noble Native will be advanced to lofty sovereignty. Now this glory is visible in the fortunate frontispiece (the diagram of the horoscope). If Jupiter, Mercury and Venus be all three in aspect to the Moon, this signifies that the Native will open up countries and will rule over them. Now in this embellished tablet (the diagram) they (the three planets) are kindling the lamp of dominion.

If the cusp of the Ascendant or the Moon be in the nuhbahr90d of a Sign and four planets or more are in aspect to the Moon, the Native will have 22 Kingdoms92a and many countries will be permanently in his possession. Now, in this horoscope, not only are the cusp of the Ascendant and the Moon in their nuhbahr, but five planets are in aspect to the Moon, viz., the Sun, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn and Mercury. And in this holy nativity, the lord of the ascendant (the Sun) is in the Third House. If the Native have a brother, the latter will not be long-lived93a but many devoted friends will gather round him (the Native) and he will be beneficent, bounteous (or forgiving) and powerful and will enjoy sovereignty, free from calamity, and prosperity without end.

The lord of the Second House (Mercury) is in the Third and so, he (the Native) will do great things and will bring wondrous works to pass. He will devise laws of dominion and wisdom and be a terror to the evil-minded, and no alarm on this account will touch the hem of his lofty spirit.

The lord of the Third House is in the Second. The Native will assist the helpless and downcast, and deal benignantly with well-disposed kindred. And all those who walk rightly will experience his bounty and benevolence, and will gather fruits from the gardens of his bounties and liberalities. It is certain that if the lord of the Third House be auspicious, the Native will attain great sovereignty. Now in this holy nativity, the Lesser Fortune93b (Venus) is lord of the Third House. This signifies a great Khilāfat and majestic Government.

The lord of the Fourth House is Mars and he is posited in the Fifth. His (Akbar's) venerable sire will help him from his place94a in heavenly secret aids and his noble children will be long-lived and will be great and famous for dominion and fortune.

The lord of the Fifth House (Sagittarius) is Jupiter and he is in the Second. He (the Native) will have ample treasures and great countries will come under his sway. And as Venus is also in the Second House, he will be acute and discriminating in musical notes,94b in subtle harmonies and in the secrets of melody.

Saturn,94c the lord of the Sixth House (Capricornus) is in the Third; so some of his (the Native's) servants will put forth evil thoughts and be trodden under foot by his wrath.

Saturn, the lord of the Seventh (Aquarius), is in the Third House; he (the Native) will perform works of majesty and splendour by his own well-directed exertions. And there rises the longing in his heart, “Oh!94d that I might have a brother who would rise high in my service!”

Jupiter, the lord of the Eighth (Pisces) is in the Second House. He (the Native) will gather abundance of goods and incalculable treasures by his own exertions. It may also happen that an inheritance95a will enure to him.

Mars, the lord of the Ninth House (Aries) is in the Fifth, viz., (Sagittarius) the House of Jupiter. This signifies strength of retention. He will have a powerful memory and whatever he transacts with mortals, will be done in a becoming manner. Fitting worship of the Creater is also indicated. And he will excel in good regulations for the prosperity of his subjects and the administration of justice. He will have fortunate and truthful children and they will be respectful and obedient.

Venus the dominant of the Tenth House (Taurus) is in the Second. He (the Native) will be respectful and submissive to his parents and the elders of his family.

Mercury, the dominant of the Eleventh95b House (Gemini) is in the Third. He (the Native) will love the attendants and servants of the Court and will protect mankind. His enemies will be turned into nothingness without any trouble or exertion on his part.

The Moon, the lord of the Twelfth House (Cancer) is in the Sixth (Capricornus). He (the Native) will have many blasphemers and opponents but they will be dispersed and scattered by the reverberating sound of his war-drums and the tumult of his majestic onset, and will descend with loss and frustration into the abode of annihilation. And if Jupiter or Saturn be in the Second House, the fortunate Native will be a great monarch and will prevail over his enemies. And whenever the Moon is in Capricorn, which is the House of Saturn and is in the nuhbahr of Saturn, this is a proof that much of the world will be submissive to the illustrious Native. His territories will be bounded by the ocean95c and his auspicious reign be long. It is also certain that, if in the nativity, Saturn be in exaltation, the noble Native will attain great empire and have long life. Now all these principles and significations are illustrated in this auspicious horoscope:

CHAPTER V.
DESCRIPTION OF THE HOROSCOPE OF AUSPICIOUS CHARACTERS WHICH WAS
CAST BY THE ERUDITE OF THE AGE, ‘AẒDU-D-DAULAH96a
AMĪR
FATḤU-L-LĀH OF SHĪRĀZ.

In the year in which the pattern of natural philosophers, sifted flour of erudition-amassing doctors, delicate balance of sciences, key of the locks of opinions, raised to lofty dignities, expounder of material truths, assayer96b of the jewels of verity, solver of Greek problems, render of the curtain between light and darkness, discerner of the stations and motions of earthly and heavenly bodies, soaring phoenix (‘anqā), very learned of the Age, ‘Aẓdu-d-daulah Amīr Fatḥu-l-lāh of Shīrāz, under the guidance of good fortune, was elevated to the pedestal of the lofty throne and obtained a robe of honour, together with degrees of exaltation and steps of advancement,—the writer of this noble volume one day remarked to him that the horoscopes of the auspicious nativity were discrepant, and expressed the hope that he would examine them according to the true namūdār, and weigh them in the trutine of inquiry. The honoured Mīr, having after complete investigation, deduced the horoscope from the Persian rules and the Greek canon, found that the birth was in Leo. As in the opinion of the writer, this is the most reliable horoscope, he gives its figure here, together with some specimens of the prognostications.

ERRATA.
Page 2,noteline 11,for Manāsabat read Munāsabat.
Page 2,noteline 11,4 lines from end read Dīwān.
Page 3,note 2,Delete the i after Z in Zi kāf and read birūn for barūn.
Page 3,note 3,read ‘ālam.
Page 7,note 1,line 4,read ◌ kaun.
Page 12,note 1,line 4,ārāī.
Page 12,note 4,line 2,ṭāq for ṭāqt.
Page 13,note 1,line 1,shāyistagī.
Page 17,noteline 1,Fundgruben.
Page 17,note 6,Ādam.
Page 18,note 6,line 5,rumūz.
Page 20,note 1,line 4,bazmgāh.
Page 20,note 1,line 5,naẓar.
NOTE to p. 7.

Dr. Bloch has kindly pointed out to me that there is an iẓāfat after ḥarf in the second hemistich of the third verse on p. 2 of text, and that the metre requires this. My translation therefore appears to be wrong and the true translation probably is—“For this is the case (ḥarf) of the Muslin and the moonlight.”

If this be so, the preceding line should apparently be translated “Think not that there is a letter of it (i.e., of God's Praise) in the (i.e. the writer's) book.”

FIGURE III.

97a97b

The cusp98a of the glorious Ascendant in this holy horoscope which is a masterpiece of the revolutions of the stars and planets, is 28° 36' Leo. The angles98b are in Fixed Signs and as the cusp of the fortunate-starred Ascendant is in the Sun's House, no planet is its dominant. It is the term of Mars, and Jupiter is lord of the triplicity,98c in companionship with the Sun and with Saturn in attendance. There are the face and darījān99a of Mars, the nuhbahr of Jupiter, ādarjān and haftbahr99b of Mars, twelfth of the Moon and detriment99c of Saturn. The degree is masculine and lucid, free from misfortune. The Sun is dominant over the Ascendant with intent towards an alliance with Saturn. Venus is in 26° 23' 37" Virgo. Admittedly the Part99d of children is 24° 23' (Virgo); that of wealth, 25° 7'; that of father's death 24° 23'; that of brethren 8° 47'; and that of the number of brethren 14° 12' Virgo.

The cusp of the Second House is 28° 43' Virgo; it is the House and exaltation of Mercury, and term of Saturn. The Moon is master of the triplicity in companionship with Venus and the doryphory99e of Mars. There are the face and nuhbahr of Mercury, darījān of Venus, ādarjān of the Moon, twelfth of the Sun, haftbahr and fall of Venus and detriment of Jupiter. The Moon is dominant over the House. The degree is masculine, void of darkness or light, of good or bad fortune. Jupiter is posited in 15° 13' 37" and Mercury in 25° 24' Libra. The Part of hope is 12° 53'; that of victory and conquest is 1° 17' Libra. The place of anterior conjunction is 24° 50' Libra.

The cusp of the Third House is 28° 1' Libra. It is the House of Venus, exaltation of Saturn, term of Mars, and Mercury is lord of the (aerial) triplicity in companionship with Saturn and attended by Jupiter. There are the face of Jupiter, the darījān, nuhbahr, twelfth and haftbahr of Mercury, ādarjān and fall of the Sun, and detriment of Mars. Saturn is paramount over this House. The degree is feminine, lucid, and void of good or bad fortune. Saturn is in 10° 40' 33" Scorpio. The Part of Fate is 17° 50' Scorpio. The Part of good Fortune, according to Ptolemy100a and Muḥyī'u-d-dīn Maghribī,100b is 18° 9' Scorpio. The Part of true friends and of welfare100c (?) and that of servants are admittedly 23° 12.' The Part of ailments is admittedly 17° 21'. The Sun is 0° 45' 57" Scorpio.

The cusp of the Fourth House is 27° 21' Scorpio. This is a cardinal point (angle) and is the House of Mars, term of Saturn, face, twelfth and detriment of Venus. The Lord of the triplicity is Mars in companionship with Venus and attended by the Moon, and there are the darījān of Mercury and the nuhbahr and haftbahr of Jupiter. Mars is paramount over this House. The degree is masculine, fixed (qayyima) and void of good or bad fortune. The Part of land journeys is 12° 28' Sagittarius. The Part of law-suits is 28° 32 Scorpio.

The cusp of the Fifth House is 27° 11' Sagittarius. It is the House and nuhbahr of Jupiter and the exaltation of the Dragon's Tail (Katabibazon), the term of Mars and face of Saturn; the lord of the triplicity is Jupiter in companionship with the Sun and with Saturn in attendance. There are the Sun's darījān, the ādarjān of Venus, the twelfth of Mars, the nuhbahr of Jupiter and haftbahr of Saturn, the fall of the Dragon's Head (Anabibazon) and the detriment of Mercury. Jupiter is paramount over the House with an inclination for the alliance of Saturn. This degree is masculine, fixed and void of good or bad fortune. The Part of sovereignty and territory is 28° 39' Sagittarius. Cygnus and Aquila are in 25° Capricorn and Mars is in 10° 48' 23". The Moon is in 19° 48" 14' Capricorn.

The cusp of the Sixth House is 26° 46' Capricorn. It is the House of Saturn, exaltation and term of Mars and face of the Sun. The Moon is master of the triplicity in companionship with Venus and attended by Mars. There are the darījān and nuhbahr of Mercury, ādarjān and twelfth and fall of Jupiter, the haftbahr and detriment of the Moon. Mars is paramount over this House in companionship with Saturn and the Moon. The degree is masculine, lucid and unfortunate. The Dragon's Head is 27° 29' 13" Aquarius. The Part of war101a and of captives is 24° 44' Capricorn. The Part of the deaths of brethren is 2° 1' Aquarius.

The cusp of the Seventh House is 28° 36' Aquarius. It is the House and twelfth and term of Saturn. The lord of the triplicity is Mercury in companionship with Saturn and attended by Jupiter. There are the face of the Moon, the darījān of Venus, ādarjān and nuhbahr of Mercury, haftbahr of Jupiter and detriment of the Sun. Saturn is paramount over this House in companionship with Mercury and with inclination to the companionship of Jupiter. The degree is masculine, dark and void of good or bad fortune. The Part of friendship, constancy, firmness and love is 20° 8' Pisces.

The cusp of the Eighth House is 28° 43' Pisces. It is the House and nuhbahr of Jupiter, exaltation of Venus, term,101b face, darījān and ādarjān of Mars who is lord of the triplicity in companionship with Venus and the doryphory of the Moon. It is the term, haftbahr and twelfth of Saturn and the fall of Mercury. Venus is paramount over this House in companionship with Mars and with inclination to alliance with the Moon. The degree is masculine, fixed, and void of good or evil fortune. The Part of excellence is 20° 8' Aries and the Part of valour 2° 53' of the same.

The cusp of the Ninth House is 28° 1' Aries. It is the House of Mars, the exaltation102a of the Sun, the term,102b fall102c and ādarjān of Saturn, and face and detriment of Venus. The lord of the triplicity is Jupiter, in companionship with the Sun, and the doryphory of Saturn. It is the darījān, nuhbahr, twelfth and haftbahr of Jupiter. Mars is paramount over this House in companionship with Jupiter and with inclination towards alliance with Saturn. The degree is masculine, light and belonging to the deep or pitted102d degrees. The Part of male children is admittedly 23° 49 Taurus. The Part of sea-voyages is 2° 36'. The Part of messengers102e is 5° Taurus.

The cusp of the Tenth House is 27° 21' Taurus. It is the House and ādarjān of Venus, the exaltation of the Moon who is master of the triplicity in companionship with Venus, and with attendance of Mars, the darījān of Saturn, the nuhbahr and haftbahr of Mercury, the twelfth term and detriment of Mars. Venus is paramount over this House in complete companionship with the Moon and in companionship with Mars. The degree is masculine, lucid and void of good or bad fortune. The Part of good fortune is admitted by all with the exception of Ptolemy and Muḥyī‘u-d-dīn Maghribī to be 9° 22' Gemini. The Part of reason and of speech is 9° 51' Gemini. The Part of disease is 25° 27' Gemini. The Part103a of male offspring is admittedly 29° 40' Taurus. The Part of abstinence (temperance) is 4° Gemini. The Part of possessions is 19° 36'. The Part of enemies is admittedly 25° 27' Gemini.

The cusp of the Eleventh House is 27° 11' Gemini. It is the House and nuhbahr of Mercury and he is lord of the triplicity in companionship with Saturn and with attendance of Jupiter. It is the exaltation of the Dragon's Head (Anabibazon) and the term and darījān of Saturn, the face of the Sun, ādarjān of Jupiter, twelfth and haftbahr of Venus. This degree is feminine and fixed, and void of good and evil fortune. The Part of the conclusions of actions and the Part of marriage are 14° Cancer. Mercury is paramount over this House in companionship with Saturn.

The cusp of the Twelfth House is 26° 46' Cancer. It is the House and face of the Moon and the exaltation,103b nuhbahr and the darījān of Jupiter. It is the term and detriment of Saturn. Mars is lord of triplicity in companionship with Venus and with the Moon in attendance. It is the ādarjān, dodecatemorion, haftbahr and fall of Mars. The Moon is paramount over this House with Jupiter, Mars, Venus and Saturn. The degree is feminine, lucid and void of good or evil fortune. The Dragon's Tail is in 27° 29' 13" Leo. The Part of knowledge and clemency (al-‘ilm wa-l-ḥilm) of superiority and victory is 18° 22'. The Part of offspring is admittedly 2° 49' The Part of fear and pain is 22° 15'. The Part of life is 2° 49' The Part of the father is 18° 22' Leo.

The hyleg104a in this horoscope is;—firstly, the point104b of anterior conjunction; secondly, the Part of Fortune; and thirdly, the Ascendant. As regards the hyleg, the kadkhudā104c is Saturn and then Jupiter; as regards105a the Part of Fortune, Jupiter comes first, then Saturn; as regards the Ascendant, the Sun comes first, then Mars.

CHAPTER VI.
EXPLANATION OF THE JUDGMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS WONDROUS
HOROSCOPE WHICH IS A BRACHIAL AMULET OF THE STARS
AND HEAVENS, AND THE CROWN-TALISMAN OF
GENERATIONS AND CYCLES.

As the foundation of the holy horoscope has been firmly laid, it is indispensable that an explanation of a few out of its many wonderful judgments should be given.

JUDGMENTS OF THE FIRST HOUSE (aḥkām).

As the cusp of the Ascendant is Leo which is the Sun's House, this signifies lofty genius and excellence, and that the holy frame106a will be strong and athletic, with a large head, broad forehead, wide chest, strength and length, courage, majesty, gravity, beauty of feature and powerful brain. As most of the degrees of the Ascendant (First House) belong to the Sign of Virgo, which is the House and exaltation of Mercury who is in the House of Venus (Libra) or Second House of the horoscope, and is near106b Jupiter and in his own term and triplicity, it is fitting that the Native should fall back upon his own exquisite intellect in all affairs of finance and state, and should accomplish his momentous enterprises by his own excellent plans. As the Sun is regent of the noble Ascendant in alliance with Saturn, the Native will have complete sovereignty over all the countries of India and over part of the fourth106c climate. And as, with reference to position,107a the Sun comes after Saturn, the empire of Hindūstān will precede that of the fourth climate. And as the lord of the second cusp, viz., Mercury, is near the lord of the Ascendant (the Sun), this is a proof that prosperity and principality (māl u mulk) will be easily acquired. As the Ascendant, the Part of Fortune and the place of prior conjunction of the Sun and Moon belong to Signs possessing many planets,107b there is strong evidence of length of life and duration of sovereignty.

JUDGMENTS OF THE SECOND HOUSE.

As the cusp of the Second House belongs to Virgo, which is the House of Mercury who is near the Sun, and most of it belongs to Libra, the House of Venus, and as Venus is in the Ascendant107c which is the House and exaltation of Mercury,—this signifies that wealth and territory will be acquired by means of excellent contrivances and perfect reason, and that the Native will obtain the office of king. And Jupiter's being in this House in his own term, and Mercury's being near him, are a strong proof of this and also that the Viziers will manage affairs by the abounding reason of the Native and not by their own plans. On the contrary, their ideas will not endure in the presence of the designs of the Lord of the Age. And as the lord of the Second House (Mercury)108a is in the Ascendant, he (the Native) will collect countless treasures; and as Jupiter is in this House, he will spend his wealth in ways pleasing to God, and will walk in God's paths and his property will increase daily.

And the fact of Jupiter's being in his own term, is a proof of long life, so that he will have honoured grandchildren and these fortunate ones will grow up under his discipline.

As Saturn is in the Second House and in exaltation, harm will never come to his (the Native's) treasures. The hyleg which is the degree of first conjunction (qu. conjunction prior to the nativity?) is in this House and is a strong proof of the above statement. The kadkhudā (lord of the geniture) which is Saturn and is in exaltation, and his companion Jupiter having come into this House, give to the holy life the influences of two kadkhudā(s). Mars is the third (kadkhudā) so that the Native will exceed the natural period of life, viz., 120 years.108b The Moon's being paramount over this House is another corroboration of the well-groundedness of this blessing.

JUDGMENTS OF THE THIRD HOUSE.

As the lord of the Ascendant (the Sun) is in the Third House, this signifies perfect mildness, sedateness, constancy and reverence and the succouring of kinsmen. But this tribe, out of short-sightedness, will not be single-minded. However as that centre (markaz) where the lord of the Ascendant (Scorpio) is, is the House of Mars and also his triplicity, term, decanate, ādarjān and darījān, and as he himself is in the Fifth House which is his House of exaltation109a and his gaudium (faraḥ) and is the triplicity and face of Jupiter, and the ādarjān of the lord of the Ascendant,—the improper thoughts of this faction will become a cause of increased glory and enhanced dominion to the Native. And as the beginnings of the Third House which have to do with brethren, are a station109b of the Sun's majesty, this signifies that brethren will be of no account alongside the glory of the holy being (Akbar) and that they will quaff the cup of anguish to the dregs. The middle and last portions of the Third House, which signify allies and helpers109c are, according to Ptolemy, the Part of Fortune and they are also the face of the Sun and he is co-partner with the kadkhudā (Saturn). This signifies that friends and loyalists will be on the carpet of union (lit: one colour) and devotion, and be steadfast in respect, and will be advanced by the Native to prosperity and wealth. And as this place of the Third House has connection with Mars who is in his exaltation, and that House is the gaudium and House of Saturn who is a foremost kadkhudā and who is also in his exaltation,—friends will always be in honour and glory, And as Saturn who is a kadkhudā and is in exaltation, is paramount in the House, this is a convincing proof of these things. And the lord (Mars) of the Third House being in the Fifth, is a proof of the establishment of noble children, and also signifies that there will be travelling and short110a excursions110b which will be provocative of joy.

One of the wonderful things is that the part of the other world, according to all, and the Part of Fortune, according to Ptolemy and Muḥyī'u-d-dīn Maghribī, are in one110c place; to wit, 18° Scorpio in the Third House. This rarely occurs in horoscopes, and forcibly indicates that good fortune upon good fortune will come in succession from the other world, and is also strong evidence for information about hidden matters, so that the enlightened mind of the Native will be a rendezvous of mysteries.

JUDGMENTS OF THE FOURTH HOUSE.

As Mars is lord of the cusp (markaz) of this House, and he is in his exaltation,110d face, and his own trigon (muṯallaṯa) and is dominant over this House and it is the term of Jupiter, what is signified is that in the beginning of his (the Native's) career territory will come into possession through the exertions of military officers. And as this House is a Fixed Sign, and its lord (Mars) is in exaltation and has a beneficent111a aspect, territory will continually be coming into the possession of the King's111b servants and whatever so comes will remain there permanently.

As the 8th and 4th111c of the degrees which belong to the beginning of Scorpio are Gemini (Jauzā') whose lord (Mercury) is occulted by the Sun's rays, this signifies that when the Native shall arrive at years of discretion, the might of his intellect will become displayed, and that his honoured112a father will at this time, have his face turned towards the hidden and inner world and will depart to the eternal city. As most of this House belongs to Sagittarius and the lord of the term (Jupiter) is in the Second House of the horoscope, the Native will be affectionate and grateful to his father and will receive an appanage112b from his dominions.

JUDGMENTS OF THE FIFTH HOUSE.

As the lord of most of the Third House which is connected with lovers and sincere friends and helpers, to wit, Mars, is in the Fifth and in exaltation, this signifies the glorious condition of the sons of the Native and their sincerity and affection. And as Saturn is paramount over this House, is in exaltation and in his own triplicity and is a kadkhudā,—and as Jupiter is in his face and triplicity and is associated with the kadkhudā (Saturn) and is lord of the cusp of this House,—this signifies that the sons of the Native will be fortunate and be defenders of the State and that they will not remove the head of respect from the plane of well-pleasing. Aquila, who is of the constitution of Mars, and Jupiter and Cygnus, who is of the constitution of Jupiter and Venus, are in this House and forcibly indicate an abundant catch (ṣaid) of pleasure and auspiciousness.

JUDGMENTS OF THE SIXTH HOUSE.

As the master (Saturn) of this House (Capricorn) is in his exaltation, and the Dragon's Head is in this House, they signify the lasting sovereignty of the Native and the acquisition of abundant wealth and property, and permanence of elemental health, and equability of disposition. Should a little sickness affect the hem of his holy constitution, it will speedily terminate in perfect health. And as Mars is paramount over this House, in co-partnership with Saturn, and both are in exaltation, there will be numerous auspicious servants113a and attendants.

JUDGMENTS OF THE SEVENTH HOUSE.

As the lord of the cusp of the Seventh113b House is Saturn113c and he is in exaltation, the Native will in his first youth, marry113d chaste veiled ones from the ruling families of India. And as Saturn is in the Second House,113e this may indicate that those chaste, curtained and holy ones will belong to his tributary and wealth-increasing princes. And as the Part of friendship and love is this House, this signifies increasing relish of friendship and love, especially as the Part of affection is in Pisces which is the House of Jupiter and the exaltation of Venus.

JUDGMENTS OF THE EIGHTH HOUSE.

As the cusp of this House belongs to Pisces and its lord, Jupiter, is in the Second, in his own term and triplicity and the Part113f of excellence is in this House, and as Venus is paramount over this House in co-partnership with Mars who is in exaltation,—this signifies the absence of fear113g and danger, and the being rendered safe by the protection and defence of God.

JUDGMENTS OF THE NINTH HOUSE.

As the cusp of this House is in the Sign of Aries and its lord, Mars, is in his exaltation and gaudium (faraḥ) and is dominant over this House, the Native will reap benefit from travel,114a and the journies which take place, will be accompanied by acquisition of territory.

JUDGMENTS OF THE TENTH HOUSE.

As the cusp of this House belongs to Taurus, which is the House of Venus, and she is dominant over it and is in the Ascendant, this signifies perfect felicity and general superiority, which is an expression for a great kingship; also that this sublime dignity will long be in the possession of the Native, especially as this House is the exaltation of the Moon. And the Moon is in an aspect114b towards this House and towards the Ascendant which is one of entire friendship. And as the Part of Fortune is, by the opinion of the majority, in this House, this signifies perfect fortune and increase of State, and that the Native will spend most of his days in managing and arranging the affairs of Church and State. And as the Part of reason and speech is in this House, it signifies that his reason and speech will be king of reasons and at the head of utterances. Much too of the specialties of Venus, who is lord of pleasure and joy, will be bestowed on him.

JUDGMENTS OF THE ELEVENTH HOUSE.

As the cusp of this House belongs to Gemini and its regent (Mercury) is in the Second House, which is that of wealth, this signifies that the hopes which he forms with regard to fortune and territory will be realized to his heart's desire. It also proves that he will have sincere friends and that the masters of wisdom and knowledge will arrive at high rank in his service. And as the Part of the conclusions of actions is in this House, this signifies that his hopes114c and desires will have a happy termination.

JUDGMENT OF THE TWELFTH HOUSE.

As the cusp of this House belongs to Cancer and its lord, the Moon, is in detriment114d and gaudium (faraḥ), this proves that the enemies of the State will be constantly in adversity and distress to whatever extent may be agreeable to the Native. And the fact of the Dragon's Tail115a (Katabibazon or Ẕanab) being there in the first degree, is strong evidence of this. And as the Part of knowledge and clemency is in this House, it signifies that the Native will, together with his insight (into character), be clement and forgiving to the short-sighted and cross-grained ones. And patience, breadth of view and general benevolence will be among his necessary attributes.

May Almighty God prolong the life of the Lord of Fortune for generations and cycles, since the attributes of greatness,—which are the root and flower of universal sovereignity and world-adornment, and are a cause of capturing the hearts of friends and foes, and attract souls and knit together the thoughts of high and low,—are revealed in all their perfection and (as it were) on an open highway (Praise be to the gracious God for it) in the aggregation of refined qualities of this Doctor of the High School of Unity; and have made him by his idiosyncracy and fundamental nature, sole owner of sublime dignity and peculiar grace. And of a certainty, all those admirable qualities and dispositions have, without effort or vaunting, become the blissful possession of this celestial Being, so that from this fountain-head of justice, they are distributed by the garden-channel of the lords115b of liberality.

Verse.

For ever, and so long as there are stars in the firmament,
For ever, and so long as there are bodies with souls,
May there be no revolution of the spheres without thy pleasure,
No movement of the heavenly bodies except according to thy will.

This is a sketch of the judgments of the auspicious horoscopes; but if the gifts of the stars, the blessings of the aspects, and the significations of the Houses, were fully set forth, registers would be compiled and books composed.

Verse.116a

His exquisite exaltations cannot be reckoned up,
Star-gazing mathematicians can but adumbrate them.

CHAPTER VII.
DIAGRAM OF THE HOLY HOROSCOPE, CAST BY MAULĀNĀ ALYĀS OF
ARDABĪL,117a
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ĪLKHĀNĪ TABLES.

At the time of writing these pages which are a record of auspiciousness, a horoscope came under my view which had been drawn by the very erudite Maulānā Alyās of Ardabīl who held high rank among mathematicians and was one of his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshiyānī's courtiers.

This horoscope also has been copied in sketch117b but without details of the influences of the Houses and the Judgments. It has been copied partly in consideration of the repute of the drawer,117c and partly because, unlike the others, it is based on the Īlkhānī Tables.

FIGURE IV.

CHAPTER VIII.
ACCOUNT OF THE DESIGN OF PROVIDENCE (Ḥikmat) IN THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THE GREEK PHILOSOPHERS AND THE INDIAN ASTROLOGERS
IN THE MATTER OF HIS MAJESTY'S AUSPICIOUS HOROSCOPE.

Some scientific men used to think that the disagreement between the Indian and Greek astronomers,—the former placing the horoscope in Leo and the latter in Virgo, was due to a difference of opinion among philosophers about the movement of the Zodiacal Heaven. A crowd119a of ancient philosophers, including Aristotle, were agreed that the Eighth119b Heaven had no motion. The philosopher Hipparchus contended that it did move, but he did not ascertain the rate of progression. Ptolemy said the motion was one degree in a century and that the revolution was completed in 36,000 years. Most philosophers hold that the rate is one degree in seventy years and that the revolution is completed in 25,200 years. Another school say that a degree is traversed in sixty-three119c years and that the revolution is completed in 22,680 years. The cause of such discrepancies is a difference in the equipment and instruments of the observatories and difference in the profundity and subtlety120a of the observations.

The fact is, the earliest philosophers did not suspect the motion of the Fixed Stars, on account of its exceeding slowness. For this reason, they did not get sufficient time to observe it.120b

At the time when the Signs of the Zodiac were determined, the figure Leo which was regarded as a constellation of several fixed stars, was opposite to and in front of a (certain) part of the Heaven of Heavens,120c and now, owing to the movement of the Zodiacal Heaven,120d it has moved from that part and is in the station where Virgo then was. Similarly Virgo has moved to the station of Libra, Libra to Scorpio and so on, up to the last Sign. Now the calculation of Indian astrologers121a is in accord with the observations of the ancient philosophers which were based on the notion that the Fixed Stars did not move. The calculation of the new observations121b is founded on the movement of the Zodiacal Heaven which has caused the constellation Leo to move to the House of Virgo. The difference between the two calculations is 17°,122a each Sign having moved 17° from its place. From this it may be known that 1190 years have elapsed from the observations of the Indian philosophers to the new ones, assuming that a degree is traversed every seventy years, and most philosophers are agreed that we should multiply 17 by 70. On the view of Ptolemy that the movement is one degree a century, the interval between the two sets of observations is 1700 years.

Keen-sighted inquirers after truth and subtle perceivers of the secrets of the skies fell into the valley of perturbation on account of these discrepancies. Now that the pattern of the philosophers of the Age, ‘Aẓdu-l-daulah Amīr Fatḥu-l-lāh of Shīrāz, has shewn by the Greek Canon and the Persian rules that his Majesty's auspicious horoscope is in Leo as has been stated above, it clearly appears that the explanation of the disagreement is not, as was commonly supposed, that the Indian philosophers deny the existence of the spheres, as has been set forth in the Second Volume.122b Rather it was the Divine wisdom (ḥikmat-i-ilāhī) and the Divine jealousy which demanded that the description of this cavalier122c of the plain of majesty and confidant of the sublime cabinet, should remain hidden from the gaze of keen-sighted, penetrating, minute inquirers, as well as from the eyes of the evil-disposed and inwardly blind.

It was from this cause, that his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshiyānī, who in astrolabic investigations and studies of astronomical Tables and observations, was at the head of the enthroned123a ones of acute knowledge and was a second Alexander,—in spite of his perfect labours and exertions in the matter of the horoscope of the Lord of the Age, did not attain to the truth (did not reveal the whole truth). And likewise all those others who were versed in the secrets of astrology, remained within the curtain of contradiction and did not arrive at a perfect knowledge of the mystery. And notwithstanding the identity of the canons of calculation and the inquiries of right-thinkers,—for natural philosophers do not materially disagree in these matters,—owing to the jealousy of God, the truth of the holy nativity remained under the veil of concealment and was hidden behind the curtain of contradiction. But on the whole, if each of the horoscopes be looked at with the eye of judgment—and a sketch of each has been given,—it becomes plain that in the matter of power, dignity and sublimity, external and internal, there is nothing equal to them. Though the horoscopes are discrepant, they agree in external and internal splendour and congratulate the Native as supreme over the visible and invisible worlds. And those intimate friends of his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshiyānī, whose outward and inward beings were clothed with truth and righteousness, have been heard to tell that when his Majesty had the auspicious horoscope shewn to him and had considered it, it happened several times that when in his private chamber and with the doors all closed, he fell a'dancing, and from excess of exultation, revolved with a circular motion. Why indeed should not sitters in the front ranks of the pavilion of true glory, and tasters of the trays of eternal knowledge—who have partaken of the sweets of ecstacy and the knowledge of God, indulge in transports of joy at the sweets of this revelation, and why should they not chaunt strains of rapture? For these perfections are steps or stages of exaltation and are the essence of Divine knowledge. And his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshiyānī was by the perfection of his personality, enlightened by flashes of forthcoming events and glimpses into the future, and his senses were warmed by the auspicious advent of his Majesty, the King of Kings. And all these lights were seen, before realization in the ranks of actions, in the mirror of the wondrous horoscope. And he many times said to those who were privileged to converse with him, that the horoscope of this Light of Fortune was superior, in several respects and by sundry degrees, to that of his Majesty, the Lord of Conjunction124a (Tīmūr) as indeed clearly appears to the scrutinizing students of the prognostications. And when these two auspicious documents are compared, and the gifts of the planets and the blessings of the heavens124b are weighed in the balance of reflection, it will be seen what are the communications of the horoscope of the Lord of Conjunction, and what are those of the holy horoscope. Praise be to God! notwithstanding the remoteness of the horoscopists in time, place and condition, and the discrepancy of their canons, every one of the glorious schemes agrees—as has been shewn—in this, that the Native will attain lofty, spiritual and temporal rank, and that his holy personality will be a collection of inward and outward excellencies and will be possessed of various perfections and will have sway over the visible and invisible world. He will have various kinds of sovereignties and various degrees of rule, and will attain lofty rank in worship of the Truth and in theology. He will befriend the poor and humble, and will have long life and soundness of body and an equable disposition and will be praised by high and low and thanked by great and small. He will have perfect knowledge of the world, and will rule countries and guard the paths of righteousness, and will perform the duties of government and of the administration of the world.

It is a remarkable circumstance that all those qualities which astrologers have come to know by toil and meditation, are read by simple-minded persons who know nothing of the diagrams of stellar mysteries, by dint of their own insight, on the forehead-page125a of his Majesty's career, though they have humbly to acknowledge the inability of language to expound them.

Verse.

Thy attributes have made tongues incoherent,
Thy glorious personality has changed certainty into conjecture.

NOTE ON THE HOROSCOPES OF AKBAR.

Abu-l-faẓl gives four horoscopes. The first and fourth however appear to be substantially the same. Both were made by Muḥammadan servants of Humāyūn,—the first by Maulānā Cānd and the fourth by Maulānā Alyās of Ardabīl. Maulānā Cānd's was drawn up according to the “New Tables,” i.e., those of Ulugh Beg Mīrzā who was Tīmūr's grandson. These were calculated for 1437. Maulānā Ilyās' horoscope was cast according to the Īlkhānī or Imperial Tables, i.e., those made by Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī at Marāgha— about 50 miles S. by W. of Tabrīz—in the reign of Hulāgū Khān cir. 1272.

Abu-l-faẓl, writing in the 40th year of Akbar, (1596) says (Jarrett II, 4.) that 362 years had elapsed since Naṣīru-d-dīn built his observatory and 156 since Ulugh Beg built his at Samarqand. This gives a date of 1440 for Ulugh Beg's Tables and of 1234 for Naṣīru-d-dīn's, but the latter is certainly wrong, and probably there is some clerical error in the text. If Hulāgū Khān first established him in Marāgha, it is assuredly wrong, but A. F. evidently thinks he was there earlier. (Āīn II, 11.)

The second horoscope was made by Jotik Rai, Akbar's astrologer. We do not know its exact date but it was, of course, drawn many years after Akbar's birth and after the construction, by Humāyūn's orders, of the first and fourth horoscopes.

The third was made by Fatḥu-l-lāh of Shīrāz and could not have been drawn earlier than 991 (1583), for this astronomer did not come to Akbar's Court till that year. Indeed A. F. tells us that it was in the first year of Fatḥu-l-lāh's service that he asked him to compare the horoscopes and reconcile their discrepancies.

Both Maulānā Cānd and Maulānā Alyās put the birth under Virgo and there is no doubt this is correct,—if correctness can be predicated of such matters. The Indian astrologers probably put the birth in Leo because that Sign is the House of the Sun, between whom and Akbar there was supposed to be a mysterious connection. Possibly however, the earlier date of their Tables warranted them in putting the birth under Leo, as A. F. has explained in his chapter on the discrepancies. But granting that this was so, we are not told why their Tables should be preferred to those of Naṣīru-d-dīn and Ulugh Beg. And indeed Abu-l-faẓl does not prefer them. He tells us that Indian Tables agree with the observations of those philosophers who are not aware that there was a movement of the Fixed Stars. In other words, he admits that they are wrong.

If the precession of the equinoxes account for the difference between the Tables, why stop short at the Hindū observations? A. F. calculates that these were made 1190 years before Ulugh Beg's, i.e., about 1336 before Fatḥu-l-lāh cast Akbar's horoscope. According to Bābar (Erskine 51.) the Hindū Tables were made at Ujjain in the time of Vikramāditya, i.e., cir. 57 B.C. According to Tod, (Rājpūtānā) Hindū astronomers now follow the Tables of Jai Singh which were made in 1728. (See Dr. Hunter's paper, Asiatic Researches V, 177.) But why did not he or Fatḥu-l-lāh carry the calculation further back and ascertain the position of the constellations of the Zodiac at the time, say, of the birth of Adam or at least, of Enoch or Idris who, according to Muḥammadans, is the father of astronomy? Some astrologers professed to know the position of the stars at the time of the Creation and held that Adam was born under 1° Capricorn (See infra for A. F.'s account of Adam). And at all events A. F., who seems to have accepted the chronology according to which Adam was born about 7000 before his own time, could have had no difficulty in calculating the position of the constellations at that period, allowing one degree for every seventy years.

According to A. F. the difference between the Indian astrologers and Maulānā Cānd amounts to 17°. But apparently Fatḥu-l-lāh did not adopt the Indian calculations, which indeed he probably could not read. (He was a Persian and we are told in the Āīn (Blochmann 104) that he superintended the translation of part of Ulugh Beg's Tables, though, if as has been supposed, these were originally written in Persian, one does not see what necessity there was for translating them. There is however a doubt on the point and A. F.'s remark implies that Ulugh Beg's Tables were written in a foreign language, e.g., Arabic or Turkish. According to D'Herbelot, they were first written in Arabic but Sédillot has no doubt that Persian was their original language). Fatḥu-l-lāh, we are told, based his calculations on the Greek and Persian Tables, not on the Indian, and found the cusp of the Ascendant to be 28° 36' Leo.

Leo is the Sign immediately preceding Virgo, and if the difference of the Hindū and Persian calculations be 17°, the cusp according to the former, should apparently be 20° Leo, for Maulānā Cānd's horoscope brought out the cusp of the Ascendant as 7° Virgo. We are not told what Tables Fatḥu-l-lāh used and are left in the dark as to his modus operandi. The difference between his calculations and those of Maulānā Cānd was apparently, about 81/2° viz., from 28° 36' Leo to 7° Virgo. If, as A. F. does, we take the rate of precession to be one degree in 70 years, Fatḥu-l-lāh must have used Tables made about 600 years before Ulugh Beg's. This would give a date of about 830 A.D., which approximates to the Baghdād observations of the Khalīf Māmūn referred to in the Āīn (Jarrett II. 3.)

If we take the more correct rate of precession, viz., one degree in 72 years, we get a still closer approximation for 81/2°=612 years and this, deducted from 1434=822 A.D.

I regret that I have not been able to translate the four horoscope chapters in a satisfactory manner. They are difficult, for several words of frequent use in them, are not to be found in our dictionaries, at least not with their astronomical meaning. Dozy's Supplement is of little or no use for astrological terms, and Lane appears to ignore them altogether. Unfortunately with all his amplitude of detail, A. F. fails us at the very pinch of the case. That is, he gives no explanation of Fatḥu-l-lāh's modus operandi and does not tell us how he managed to bring the horoscope into Leo.

It is probable that in places, the text is corrupt.

Books on astrology are very numerous. One of the best of the old treatises is De Judiciis Astrorum by ‘Alī Abu-l-ḥasan (Albohazan Haly Aben Rajal). He, it appears, was born in Spain, for he is styled Ash-Shaibānī and Ash-Shabīlī (Hispaliensis) and his full name is Abu-l-ḥasan ‘Alī Ibn Abi-r-rajālu-sh-shaibānī.

In Hammer-Purgstall's History of Arabian Literature, (6436) he is styled ‘Alī Ibn Rajāl and we are told that Europeans called him Aben-Ragel and that he was born at Cordova and lived in the beginning of the 5th century of the Hijra.

His work on astrology, “Opus magnum de astrologia, octo partibus comprehensum,” was first translated from Arabic into Spanish by order of Alphonso, the king of Castile, and afterwards from Spanish into Latin. He appears also to have been a poet, for a poem of his on astrology is mentioned in Casiri's catalogue of the Escurial Library I, 128 and 344. The best edition of Haly's work appears to be that by Anthony Stupa, Basle, 1551. There is a copy of this in the British Museum and bound up with it, is an elaborate treatise on astrology by Guido Bonatus and also a commentary on the Tetrabiblos.

Guido Bonatus, also called Guido Bonatti and Bonati, was a noted astrologer of the 13th century. He was a native of Florence, but is commonly called Foroliviensis or De Foro Livii, the modern Forli, a town on the eastern side of the Appenines and not far from Ravenna. He is said by his astrological skill to have saved Forli from a siege. Eventually he became a monk and died in 1296.

Lilly quotes Abu-l-ḥasan under the name of Haly and Sir Walter Scott makes Guy Mannering refer both to him and to Guido Bonatus. Délambre says, in his History of astronomy in the Middle Ages, that Abu-l-ḥasan's book “est l'un des plus clairs, des plus méthodiques, and des plus complétes que nous ayons. C'est une compilation de tout ce que les sages de différents pays et de différents siécles avaient écrit sur ce sujet futile.” It appears that Haly was a Christian. There is a MS. copy of his work in the British Museum written in beautifully clear Arabic characters. It is numbered 23,399. See Codices Arabici 623b. It is to be hoped that some day an Arabic scholar will print and edit it.

Lilly's Christian Astrology and the works of Zadkiel are useful and so also are Wilson's Dictionary of Astrology (London, 1819), and a work by E. Sibley in two quarto volumes and published in 1817. For Hindū astrology, I can recommend two Bengali books kindly sent me by Dr. Grierson, viz., the Jyōtiṣa Prakāça (Beni Madhab De & Co., Calcutta, 1882, Sak. 1804) and the Varāha Mihira of Kali Prosanna Chattarji (1891, Fasli 1300). I have also found the notes of Muḥammad Ṣādiq ‘Alī the Lucknow editor of the Akbarnāma very useful and I have obtained some light from the two elaborate horoscopes of Shāh Jahān,—one of his birth and the other of his accession,—which are given in ‘Abdu-l-ḥamīd's Bādshāhnāma.

Mr. Rehatsek's Catalogue of the Mullā Fīrōz Library in Bombay shews that it is very rich in Persian works on astrology.

To the useful books on Astrology may be added the treatise of Julius Firmicus Maternus, a Latin writer of the 4th century A.D. A good and cheap edition of this work is in course of publication at Leipsic under the editorship of Charles Sittl. Firmicus describes the Dodecatemoria, p. 48, the Decani, p. 41, and has a chapter, p. 233, on empty and full degrees, the full being degrees where the Decani are found, and the empty where their influence does not operate.

CHAPTER IX.
STATEMENT OF THE HONOURED NAMES OF THE BLISSFUL NURSES AND
SPIRITUALLY-MOULDED CHERISHERS129a
(qawābil-i-rūḥānī-qawālib)
OF HIS MAJESTY, THE KING OF KINGS.

When the lightsome day of his creation arrived, at once was Heaven envious of Earth for his passing,129b and Earth exultant o'er Heaven for his august advent. The status of knowledge and insight became exalted, and with rites which are the glory of the ministers of outward show, was that holy essence and pure pearl —already washed and cleansed at the fountain-head of Divine Light and in the ocean of infinite knowledge (ma‘rifat)—bathed and composed by the hands of shade-loving, radiance-darting, chaste, rose-bodied nymphs. Even-tempered, spiritually-minded nurses swathed the divine form and heavenly body in auspicious swaddling-bands, purer than angelic veils, and laid him with respect and reverence in the sacred arms and bosoms of pure-dispositioned ones. And then his honied129c lips being brought in contact with the benign breasts, his mouth was sweetened by the life-giving fluid.

Verse.

He drew forth milk by the bounty of his lips,
Milk and sugar were commingled.
It was not milk he drank from the breast of hope,
'Twas water from the Sun's fountain that he imbibed.

As the nobly-born Shamsu-d-dīn Muḥammad of Ghaznī had done a good service at Kanauj,130a his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshyānī, shortly before the rising of this light of fortune, (Akbar) in magnificent recompense of his deed, made him hopeful of eternal bliss by promising him the majestic boon, that his high-souled, chaste-natured consort—who has now the lofty title of Jījī130b Anaga—should be clothed with the glorious head-dress (mi‘jar) and mantle of distinction, by obtaining the auspicious service of nursing this new fruit of the spring-tide of sovereignty and fortune, and should have the blissful charge130c of the nosegay of the house-garden of greatness and glory.

Accordingly her Majesty, Maryam-makānī, Qadasī-arkānī (Pillar of Purity) having sent for that adorner of Heaven's table (i.e., celestial caterer) placed in an auspicious moment, the child-treasure in her hopeful bosom. But as the period of pregnancy130d of this purely-framed nurse was not yet fulfilled, her Majesty ordered that receptacle of chastity, Dāya Bhāwal—a special servant of his Majesty Jahānbānī, and distinguished for virtue and purity—to suckle the infant. It appears that first of all, he accepted the milk of his royal mother. Then Fakhr-i-nisā,130e wife of Nadīm Koka was honoured by the charge, then Bhāwal Anaga, then the wife of Khwāja Ghāzī,130f then Ḥakīma. After these, the chaste Jījī Anaga, in accordance with her wish, obtained external and internal felicity. After her, Kokī Anaga, wife of Tōgh Begi131a and after her, Bībī Rūpā131b had their turn of this auspicious service. Then Khāldār (i.e., the mole-marked) Anaga, mother of Sa‘ādat Yār Koka,131c was selected for this great boon. And at last, that chaste matron, Pīja Jān Anaga,131d mother of Zain Khān Koka, acquired a stock of everlasting greatness by obtaining her wish for this great blessing. Many other fortunate cupolas of chastity were exalted by the excellence of this service. It was as if there were Divine wisdom in thus implanting varied temperaments131e by this series of developments (i.e., the wet-nurses) so that the pure entity,131f advancing by gradations, might become familiar with the divers methods of Divine manifestation. Or it might be designed that the acute and discerning should perceive that this nursling of fortune belonged to the limpid streams of Divine bounty and was not such as to make spiritual progress by outward nutriment, for as to the spiritual nature of this company (of nurses),132a it is evident to all of what kind that was, as also are the lofty degrees of the holy stages of this chosen one.

Among other wondrous indications there was this, that contrary to the way of other infants, his Majesty, the king of kings, at his birth and at the first opening of his eyes on the visible world, rejoiced the hearts of the wise by a sweet smile.132b Penetrating physiognomists recognized the smile as the herald-augury of the smiles of the spring of dominion and fortune and saw in it, the opening bud of hope and peace.

After that (i.e., the suckling), in a cradle lighter than a phantom (which the carpenters of the throne of sovereignty had framed of sandal-wood and lign-aloes, and where they had, as it were, commingled civet132c and rose-leaves, and on whose corners and sides they had hung rubies and pearls of price) was laid with gentlest movement that unique Pearl of nine mothers o'pearl,132d and then they softly swayed and rocked him. For cheer and soothing, they chaunted with musical (mūsīqī) rhythm the name—auspicious to begin with and fitting as a close—of the Creator, the Lord of Glory and Bounty. The inmates132e of holy hermitages and those who live in the throng of men who are the stewards of time and the terrene and hold together the spheres of the universe, attained their desires and thus were benefits bestowed on the world and on mankind. They sang this gratulatory strain to the darling133a of the skies.

Verse.

Hail to thee to whom is committed reason's exaltation.133b
The kingly revolution of the universe is for thee.
Like thee, the earth has no garden;
Like thee, heaven's vault no lamp.
Creative ocean rolled many a wave
Till it cast ashore a pearl like thee.
Fate's pencil drew many a sketch
Till she made a portrait like thee.
The world's book is but an allusion133c to thee,
Heaven's volume but an analysis133d of thee.

MĀHAM ANAGA.

It is singular that this name does not occur in the list of Akbar's nurses. This may be due to Māham Anaga's being a title and not a proper name, and it is possible that the lady who was afterwards thus designated, is mentioned in the list under some other appellation. She may, for instance, be the nurse described as the wife of Khwāja Ghāzī and whose own name is not given. But even if the title were not bestowed till a later period, one would have expected A. F. to have added it to his description, just as he mentions Shamsu-d-dīn's wife by her title of Jījī Anaga. The true explanation of the omission probably is that Māham Anaga means Head or Superintendent of the nurses rather than chief nurse and that the Māham Anaga of the Akbarnāma was not a wet-nurse. She certainly was not the chief nurse in the sense that the child Akbar drew most of his nourishment from her, for we are told that Jījī Anaga was chief in this respect, so much so that the other nurses accused her of practising witchcraft in order to prevent the infant prince from accepting any breast but her own.

Though Anaga seems primarily to mean a wet-nurse, it has not always this meaning. Pavet de Courteille says (Turkish Dictionary, 57) “◌ et ◌, nourrice, sage-femme, gouvernante; on donne aussi à la mère du Khān le titre de ◌.” We find also that the mother of Cingīz Khān had this title, her name being given in the Akbarnāma (I. 72, top line) as “Olun Anaga” though Erdmann spells it Eke. Apparently the Turkish pronunciation is Enge. See Redhouse s. v. He states that it means a sister-in-law, the wife of an elder brother or lady-relative of a bridegroom who is sent to fetch the bride home. A. F. sometimes calls Māham Anaga, Māham Bega and Māham Āgha, and it is generally by the title of Bega that Bāyazīd Sulṭān speaks of her in the so-called Tārīkh-i-humāyūn. (I. O. Ms. No. 216). He calls her (15) Māham Bega and adds the explanation ke āgha anaga Nawāb-i-īshān būd, i.e., who was head of the Prince's nurses. And then follows the statement that she was accompanied by Jījī Anaga, wife of Shamsu-d-dīn Mu. Ghaznawī who was the Prince's nurse (anaga). (Unless indeed the word is atgah and refers to Shamsud-dīn.)

In the Akbarnāma (II. 55) we are told that Māham Anaga had served the prince from his cradle, but it does not follow that she first did so in the capacity of wet-nurse. It may be remarked too that the fact of our not hearing that she had a husband or a child of about Akbar's age militates against the notion that she was his wet-nurse. Though her son, Adham Khān was a young man at the time of his death, he was probably several years older than Akbar as otherwise Bāyazīd would hardly have named him in the list of servants in Akbar's train at the time when Humāyūn marched to India.

CHAPTER X.135a
ACCOUNT OF THE ARRIVAL OF HIS MAJESTY AT THE WORLD-TRAVERSING
CAMP135b
OF HIS MAJESTY JAHĀNBĀNĪ JANNAT-ĀSHYĀNĪ, FROM THE
FORT OF AMARKOṬ AND OF THE AUSPICIOUS135c
CONJUNCTION.

As the world-seeing eye and auspicious glance of his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat-āshyānī was looking for the glorious vision of the king of kings, a gracious order was issued that he should be brought to the curtain135d of honour and encampment of fortune, in charge of her Majesty Maryam-makānī. Khwāja Mu‘aẓẓam,135e Nadīm Kūkal-tāsh and Shamsu-d-dīn Mu. of Ghaznī were sent to be in attendance on the auspicious litter. Accordingly his Majesty left Amarkoṭ, on the 11th Sha‘bān135f in a fortunate hour, under the care and in the arms of her Highness Maryam-makānī and departed in a travelling litter.135g

Verse.

Ere the cradle had fulfilled its season,
His exalted fortune (bakht) sat on a throne, (takht)136a
Eye unopened, but with the eye of the mind,
He looked to the ordering of religion and realm;
Hand unopened, but his heart desiring
To put the world 'neath his signet-ring,
Of his thousand roses, not one in bloom,
Yet the world was culling flowers from the garden of his fortune.

When the travelling litter of his Majesty, the king of kings, the ambulatory treasury of Divine knowledge, had nearly arrived and but two stages remained, a world-obeyed order was issued that the chief officers136b and pillars of the State and the general public, small and great, should turn towards the altar of fortune and go to meet the ka‘ba of hopes. Avant-couriers of good tidings were arriving every minute and bringing, from time to time, the news of the appropinquating of the glorious advent.

Verse.

The cavalcade approaches with the king of both worlds in its wake,136c
The caravan of joy goes forth to meet him.

And on the last day of Sha‘bān which was the day for the glorious alighting, and when the camp of good fortune was only one stage distant, his Majesty (Humāyūn) was pleased to observe “Assuredly the child is compact of auspiciousness, of potent horoscope and has the good fortune of the two worlds enfolded in him, for, as he draws nigh, there is another136d assemblage of spectators in the upper world who exhibit a virgin joy.” What marvel is it that the pure soul and illumined intellect of his Majesty Jahānbānī Jannat -āshyānī should be cognizant of the Divine secrets and be aware of the truths hidden in celestial treasuries? Or how is it strange that there should be an epiphany on the apparition of his Majesty, the king of kings, the shadow of God, the archetype of the strange frontispieces of the universe, and collection of the catalogues of the perfections of the sons of Adam? And in an hour which held the auspicious influences of the conjunctions of the two Fortunes137a and of the two luminaries (the Sun and Moon), his Majesty (Akbar) alighted with felicity and dominion at the majestic and glorious enclosure, and became fortunate by arriving at the station of light and took repose under the shadow of the phoenix (humā) of eternal prosperity. The blessed crown (tārak, i.e., crown of the head) of his Majesty, the king of kings, was made fortunate by touching the throne-brushing feet of his Majesty Jahānbānī and by becoming united to a perfect saint (pīr). The latter took him lovingly in his arms and kissed him on the luminous brow, the tablet of the fortunes of the two worlds and title-page of happiness everlasting.

Verse.

Whiles he held him to his lip, whiles to his heart, and whiles to his head.

After gazing on this holy light, the inspired tongue engaged in returning thanks to the Lord God, Most High and Most Glorious, and the pole-star-like137b head was lowered in supplicating prostration at the portals of the All-sufficient One.

Verse.137c

Not only was the head ever bowed,
Each hair of his body also bent in adoration.

The guardians of the Divine bounty and the treasurers of infinite auspiciousness delivered that deposit of eternities—past and future—into the king's gracious bosom and warbled, sweet and low, this strain of thanksgiving.

Verse.

This is the Divine deposit.
Ask of this treasury whatever thou desirest,
This is he in whose heart they placed
Essential substance, verity absolute.
This is he whose threshold's ka‘ba138a
Is seized upon by kings as their altar (qibla).
This is he who hath the foot of dominion,
Enlightener of the throne royal.

Readers of the page of the human countenance beheld him with the eye of meditation and reflection and physiognomists perused him with the glance of consideration and contemplation.

Verse.

What did they see? A picture such as never
Did they see in Creation's tables.
From astonishment naught did they say, save
Hail, Light of Wisdom, Eye of Insight, hail.

Kingly lights shone from his lustrous brow. The letters “Shadow of God” were apparent in the lines of his palm. The witnesses of Reason were visible in the composite of his substance. The notes of Theosophy were manifest in his whole being. Justice was demonstrated in the evenness of his temperament. Proofs of beneficence were revealed in the essence of his nature. The characters of a Lord of Conjunction shone out from the fair schedules of his ephemeris. Knowledge of occult sciences was evidenced in the illumined records of his constitution. Remote mysteries were revealed by his keen sight. Far-reaching thoughts streamed out from his lofty glance.

CHAPTER XI.
ACCOUNT OF SOME OF THE WONDERFUL ETEOSTICS ON THE AUSPICIOUS
BIRTH OF HIS MAJESTY, THE KING OF KINGS.

Ingenious men made eteostics in prose and verse on the noble nativity and composed gratulatory odes. They tendered them for acceptance at the Court of his Majesty Jahānbānī which was the assay-room of human jewels, and received glorious gifts.

Among them, this chronogram by Maulānā Nūru-d-dīn Tarkhān139a received the palm of applause and approbation.

Quatrain.

When the fateful pen of destiny wrote the record,
It added a comment to the immortal verse
And wrote, “From the birth-boon of the world's king of kings
The date is Shāhinshāh Jahāngīr.”139b (World-seizing king of kings.)

And this wonderfully apposite chronogram was discovered by one of the learned of the Age.

Verse.

Laus Deo! there has come into being
He who is the world's epitome,
A king greater139c than the kings of the Earth,

Akbar his name, Jalāl (Glorious) his title.
The year, the month, nycthemeron of birth
Are “Sunday night, five Rajab.”140a (949 H.)

CHAPTER XII.
THANKSGIVING OF ABŪ'L-FAẒL, THE AUTHOR OF THIS NOBLE VOLUME,
FOR HAVING BEHELD THE TIME OF THIS SOVEREIGNTY AND FOR
HAVING LONG SERVED HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF KINGS.

Although it be a heavy sorrow that, at the rising of the Luminary of Fortune, the author of this noble volume was in the abode of non-existence,141a without being or the adornment of Divine worship, yet how can he discharge his debt of thanks for the grand mercy of his having witnessed the era of the subjectively and objectively Great One, the ruler of the visible and the invisible? and of having been one on whom has fallen the glance of his favour and guidance? And hundreds more of thanks for this, that, ere he had seen the holy horoscope, or its noble secrets and wondrous glories had been revealed to him, he had understood that perfection of sanctity and sovereignty which is beyond the reach of the astrologer's science, and was a slave of the Divine power.141b And praise upon praise be to God that I am not, like Imāmu-l-kalām, Ḥassānu-l-‘ajam, Lisānu-l-ḥaqīqat, Ḥakīm Khāqānī,141c sighing for the Lord of the Age who is indispensable for the control of the visible and invisible worlds. For instance he has written thus:—

Quatrain.

They say that every thousand years of the world
There comes into existence a true man.
He came before this, ere we142a were born from nothingness,

He will come after this when we have departed in sorrow. Elsewhere he says,

Every now142b and then, the world is saturated with wretches,
Then a shining soul comes down out of the sky.
Khāqānī! seek not in this Age for such a thing,
Sit not by the way for the caravan will come late.

By auspicious good fortune, I obtained the service of this issuer of universal orders and explicator of the ways, and by the favour of his patronage and exalted kindness, comfort was brought to my soul,— perturbed by the deceptions of the day and dumb-founded in a wilderness of wants,—and no connexion with the world nor anxiety remained save to acquire his favour which indeed is tantamount to the pleasing of God. And my mind being freed from the bondage of secularity and the restraints of the world, was neither agitated142c by regret for the past nor longing for the future. Hereafter142d there will be given in its proper place, an account of my obtaining the blessing of his service, of my reaching the shade of favour and kindness, and of my being exalted above the apices of honour and eminence to the Seventh142e Heaven of cognition (ma‘rifat).

CHAPTER XIII.
ARRANGEMENT OF THE LOFTY-TITLED LINE AND LIST OF THE NOBLE
NAMES OF THE EMINENT ANCESTORS OF HIS MAJESTY,
THE KING OF KINGS.

The following list gives the excellent appellations of the heaven-descended forefathers of his Majesty, who are linked to celestial143a ancestors by degrees of exaltation and gradations of greatness, and all of whom came as kings, kings of kings, kingdom-bestowers and king-makers, and governed the world by God-given wisdom and true insight, such as justice and equity require, so that they have left behind them on this earth the reverberation of a good name, which is a second life, or rather, is life eternal.

List.143b
1.Adam. Peace be upon him.
2.Seth. (Text, Shīṯ.)
3.Enosh.
4.Kenan.
5.Mahalalil. (Text, Mahalāīl.)
6.Jared. (Text, Yarid.)
7.Enoch. (Ikhnūkh, Text.)
8.Methusalah.
9.Lamech.
10.Noah.
11.Japheth. (Text, Yāfiṯ.)
12.Turk.
13.Alinja Khān.
14.Dīb Bāqūī.
15.Kayūk Khān. (Text, Gayūk.)
16.Alinja Khān.
17.Mughal Khān.
18.Qarā Khān.
19.Aghuz Khān. (Text, Aghur.)
20.Kun Khān.
21.Āī Khān.
22.Yaldūz Khān.
23.Mangalī Khān. (Text, Mankalī.)
24.Tingīz Khān.
25.Īl Khān.
26.Qīyān.
144a144b
(Here there is a break.)

Of the descendants of Qīyān are;—

27.Tīmūr Tāsh.
28.Mangalī Khwāja.
29.Yaldūz.
30.Jū'īna Bahādur.
31.Ālanqū'ā, daughter of the preceding.
32.Būzanjar Qā'ān, son of the preceding.
33.Buqā Qā'ān.
34.Ẕūtamīn Khān. (Also Dūtamīn.)
35.Qāydū Khān.
36.Bāysanghar Khān.
37.Tumana Khān.
38.Qāculī Bahādur.
39.Iradam-cī Barlās.
40.Sūghuj-cī.
41.Qarācār Nuyān.
42.Ical Nuyān.
43.Alankīr Bahādur. (Var. infra, Ailanyar Khān.)
44.Amīr Barkal.
45.Amīr Ṭarāghāī.
46.Ṣāḥib Qarān Quṭbu-d-dunyā wa-d-dīn, Amīr Tīmūr Gūrgān.
47.Mīrān Shāh.
48.Sulṭān Muḥammad Mīrzā.
49.Sulṭān Abū Sa‘īd Mīrzā.
50.‘Umar Shaikh Mīrzā.
51.Ẓahīru-d-dīn Muḥammad Bābar Pādshāh.
52.Naṣīru-d-dīn Muḥammad Humāyūn Pādshāh.
53.Abū'l-Muẓaffar Jalālu-d-dīn Muḥammad Akbar Pādshāh.
145a145b145c145d145e145f145g145h145i

Let it not be concealed that the auspicious record of these high-born ones is implanted and contained in the breast-pages146a of the transmitters of words, and recorded and expressed by the conserving tongues of the writings of epochs, as far as Yaldūz who is the 25th146b (i.e., counting upwards) in ascent from his Majesty and that for the period from Mangalī Khwāja to Īl Khān146c which may be reckoned as 2,000146d years, nothing has come to light. The cause of this will be explained hereafter.

From Īl Khān to Adam there are 24146e persons. These have been described by historians, and a brief account of them will be given.

Far-sighted philosophers who with ripe judgment and God-given wisdom, have investigated the records of the past, and who have made the recognition of truth a sacred trust, and who exhibit research in the weighing of facts, are aware that the hearsay reports and traditions about man's origin occurring 7,000 years ago is a thing not to be accepted by sages who contemplate the rise147a and decay of the world and (can appreciate all the tones) of the seven climes.

In these matters, right-thinking and far-seeing Reason, after true and just investigation, sometimes answers in the negative, and sometimes, out of caution—that baiting place of tranquillity and station of wisdom—delays either to admit or to deny.

By help of Reason—the glory of the world,—and the assistance of trustworthy records and reliable statements about the world, such as the ancient books of India and Cathay (Khiṭā), etc., which have been preserved from the agitations of accidents and with which agree the principles of astronomy and the conclusions of astronomical observations, (and such things yield trustworthy evidence) and also from the successive series of the biographies of the sages of those countries and the catena of opinions of this disciplined body (philosophers), it appears that the beginning of the world and of mortals and the source of the manifestations of the Divine attributes has not been discovered. Either it is eternal, as was the opinion of many ancient philosophers, or of such antiquity as to approximate to eternity.

The sect of Sīūrhā147b (Jains) who are preëminent in all the countries of India for austerity, asceticism and science, divide time— called kāl in the Indian language—into two parts. One is Avasarpiṇī (descending cycle), i.e., the period whose beginning is joyful and end grievous, and the other is Utsarpiṇī (ascending cycle), i.e., the opposite of the first. Each of these periods is divided into six parts, called āras.148a Each āra has a distinct name in accordance with its speciality.

The first āra of the Avasarpiṇī is called Sukhmān-sukhmān, the meaning of the reduplication being that this portion brings joy upon joy and happiness upon happiness. The length of this happy time is four kōrākōr-sāgar. The name of the second āra is Sukhmān, i.e., a time of felicity and joy. Its duration is three kōrākōr-sāgar. The name of the third āra is Sukhām (Sukhmān) Dukhmān, i.e., sorrow and misfortune crop up in the time of joy. Its duration is two kōrākōr-sāgar. The fourth āra is called Dukhmān-sukhmān, i.e., joy and freedom from care rise up in the time of grief and sorrow. Its duration is less than one kōrākōr by 42,000148b years.

The fifth āra is Dukhmān being the opposite of the second which was Sukhmān. The duration of this āra is 21,000 years. The sixth āra is Dukhmān-dukhmān being the opposite of the first. Its length is likewise 21,000 years. The names of the āras of the second period (Utsarpiṇī) are the same but the first of them corresponds to the sixth āra of the first period, the second to the fifth, the third to the fourth, and the fourth to the third, the fifth to the second, and the sixth to the first of the first period. Their opinion is that at the present day, two thousand and odd years of the fifth āra of the first period have elapsed.

Be it known149a that the arithmeticians of India call 100,000 a lak; ten laks a prayūt, ten prayūts a krōr, one hundred krōrs an arb, ten arbs a kharba, ten kharbs a nikharb, ten nikharbs a mahāsarūj or padm, ten padms a sankha, and ten sankhas a samudr or kōrākōr.

Be it known also that their opinion is that in a former period, in a particular place, a son and a daughter were born at each birth, a notion also prevalent amongst ourselves.149b

This sect thinks also that the hair of the infants of the district of Delhi is 4096 times coarser than the hair of those beings whom they call juglī149c (yugala).

And they say that if the hair of a seven days old juglī infant, which is excessively fine, be subdivided to the uttermost and an abyss (lit., a well) ten miles150a in depth, breadth and length, be filled with such particles and after a lapse of a hundred150b years, one segment be taken out, the time in which, at this rate, the abyss will be emptied is a palūpam (? ◌ palya). And when ten samudr,—an explanation of which term has already been given,—of palūpam(s) have elapsed, the period is a sāgar. The durations of the aforesaid cycles transcend, in their opinion, the power of calculation or description. Their opinion also is that for the management of the visible and invisible world, twenty-four venerable men (ādam) come forth from the hidden universe into the apparent one, every six āras and then pass150c away. The name of the first of these is Ādināth and they call him also Raghunāth. The sway of this chosen one of God lasts fifty krōrs of laks of sāgaras. The name of the last is Mahāvīra.150d His sway lasts for 20,000 years, of which 2,000 have elapsed at the present day. And the belief of this sect is that these twenty-four have come into existence many times and will come again many times.

OPINIONS OF THE BRĀHMA.

The Brāhma of India whose teachings and practices are observed by the majority of Indians, are agreed that the revolutions of the world consist of four Ages. The first, the period of which is 1,728,000 years, they call the Sat Yug. In this Age every single action of mankind is right, and high and low, rich and poor, great and small make truth and uprightness their rule, and show a walk and conversation pleasing to God. The natural life of man in this Age is 100,000 years.

The second Age is called Trētā and lasts 1,296,000 years. In it, three-fourths of mankind follow ways well-pleasing to God, and the natural duration of life is 10,000 years.

The third Age is called the Dwāpar and lasts 864,000 years. In it, one-half of mankind speak and act rightly, and the natural life is 1,000 years.

The fourth Age is the Kal Yug. Its period is 432,000151a years. During it, three-fourths of mortals follow ways of falsehood and unrighteousness, and the natural life is 100 years.

This school firmly believes that every now and then the Life-Giver of mankind and producer of beings, brings an ascetic and sage151b from the veil of concealment and non-existence to the palace of manifestation and existence and makes him the instrument for the creation of the world. This mighty one is called Brahmā. Their belief is that a Brahmā lives 100 years, each consisting of 360 days151c and every day151d and every night is equal to a thousand times four Ages (Mahāyug.) In their opinion, the number of Brahmās who have come into existence cannot be known by the human intellect, but they say that according to what has been received from authorities152a on the subject of Brahmā, the present Brahmā is the thousand and first, and that fifty years and half152b a day of the life of this wondrous being have elapsed at the present time.

The writer of this divine masterpiece has written the account of these two doctrines according to the translation of learned and pious Indians152c from their venerated books. Also in the writings of Shaikh Ibn ‘Arabī152d and Shaikh Sa‘du-d-dīn153a Ḥamūī who were great saints and masters of exposition and ecstacy, it is stated in the explanation of Divine (Ilāhī) days and of Rabbānī153b days that each Rabbānī day is made up of 1,000 years and every Divine day of 50,000. And the author of Nafā'isu-l-funūn153c has related that in the histories of Cathay, it is written that from the time of Adam Abū-l-bashar (Father of mankind) till now (i.e., the date when the author of the Nafā'is was writing) which is 735 H., (1334 A.D.) 8863 wans154a (Text, 863) 9,800 years have elapsed.

A wan with them is 10,000 years. Such is the wide expanse of God's kingdom that it is not improbable that these tales and traditions may be true. There may have been many Adams. Indeed it is stated by Imām Ja‘far Ṣādiq, (Peace be on him!) that there have been thousands upon thousands of Adams before the Adam who was our father. And Shaikh Ibn ‘Arabī says it is not improbable that after a Divine (Rabbānī) week, which is 7,000 years and the period of the cycle154b of the sovereignty of the seven planets, one race is terminated and another Adam puts on the robe of existence.

And now, giving truce to length of words and littleness of matter, I proceed to sketch in this glorious record, without converting154c it into extensive histories, the blissful biography of those fifty-two persons who extend154d from Adam down to his Majesty, the king of kings, so that it may be a cause of increase of knowledge. As I know that this exposition of grandeur will be a complement to the account of his Majesty, the king of kings, I shall treat it with the concision which is the adornment of an author.

CHAPTER XIV.
ACCOUNT OF ADAM (PEACE BE UPON HIM!)

It is well-known that he came into existence about 7,000155a years ago through the perfect power of God, without the intervention of a father's loins or a mother's womb and that he was equably compounded of the four elements. His soul emanated from the fountain of bounty in perfection proportionate to his body. He was entitled man (insān) and received the name of Adam.

At that time the first degree of Capricorn155b coincided with the eastern horizon, and Saturn was in that Sign, while Jupiter was in Pisces, Mars in Aries, the Moon in Leo, the Sun and Mercury in Virgo, and Venus in Libra. Some have said that at that time, all the planets were in their degrees of exaltation, but clearly this does not accord with astronomy for there is a difficulty about Mercury,— the Sun's exaltation being in Aries and Mercury's in Virgo. But Mercury can never be more than 27° distant from the Sun, how then can he be in exaltation when the Sun is in exaltation, or how can the Sun be in exaltation when Mercury is so? And reflecting on the astrological principle that Mercury takes the nature of whatever planet he be associated with, it has occurred to me that Mercury may have been in the condition of applying155c to some other planet which was in exaltation.

Adam was of lofty stature, of a wheaten colour, had curling hair and a handsome countenance. There are different accounts of the stature of this patriarch, but most agree that he was sixty cubits high. Almighty God produced Eve from his left side and gave her in marriage to him, and by her he begat children. Historians have told many strange and wondrous things about this hero and though there be no difficulty about the extent of God's power, yet experienced and practical men of the world, on looking to the course of nature, rather hesitate about accepting them. It is said that at the time of his death, he had 40,000 descendants, and that his immediate children were 41, viz., 21 boys and 20156a girls, but some say there were 19 girls. Seth was the most eminent of them all.

Some have said that Adam wrote about elixirs156b (?) (ta‘fīnāt) and other occult sciences. For example the very learned Shahrazūrī157a has so stated in his “Lives of Philosophers.” It is said Adam died in India and was buried on a mountain in Ceylon158a (an island) which lies towards the south and which is now known by the name of Qadamgāh-i-ādam (Adam's footprint, i.e., Adam's Peak.) He was ill 21 days and Eve died, according to one account, a year, according to another, seven years and according to a third, three days after him. Seth, his successor and administrator, buried her by Adam's side, and it is reported that Noah brought their coffin on board the Ark at the time of the Deluge, and afterwards buried them on Abū qubais.158b According to another account, they were buried in Jerusalem, and according to a third tradition, in Najf-Kūfa.158c

SETH—PEACE BE UPON HIM

Was the most excellent of Adam's immediate descendants, and was born after the catastrophe of Abel. It is said that whenever Eve became pregnant, she gave birth to a son and a daughter, but that Seth was born alone. Iqlīmīyā,158d the (twin) sister of Cain was given in marriage to him (Seth.) When Adam reached the age of a thousand, he made Seth his successor, and enjoined all to submit to him. In succession to Adam, he carried on, by his weighty intellect, the administration of the temporal and spiritual worlds. He always conducted himself with outward composure and inward efficiency, and his were the only descendants who survived Noah's Flood. He is called the first Uria,159a a word which in Syriac means teacher. He occupied himself with the medical,159b mathematical and theological sciences, and spent most of his life in Syria. Many of his descendants abandoned secular affairs and practised asceticism in hermitages. He left the world when he was 912 years old. Some say that he was Adam's grandson and that his father was Sulha,159c but this tale is without foundation.

ENOSH.

Enosh was born when Seth was 600 years old. A number of writers say that his mother was an immaculately-born160a one who, like Adam, was clothed with the garment of life without the instrumentality of father or mother. He succeeded his father in accordance with a testament, and was the first who in this cycle, laid the foundations of sovereignty.160b They say he reigned 600 years. According to Jewish and Christian160c traditions, he lived 965 years,— according to Ibn Jauzī,160d 950,—and according to Qāẓī Baiẓāwī,160e 600. He had many children.

KENAN.160f

Kenan was the most enlightened, fortunate and sagacious of the sons of Enosh. After his father's death, this hero, in accordance with a testamentary disposition, swayed the affairs of mankind and walked in the ways of his illustrious ancestors. He erected the buildings of Babylon and founded the city of Sūs.160g They ascribe to him the first establishment of houses and gardens.

The numbers of mankind greatly increased during his time. By his wisdom, he distributed them (over the earth), and himself settled with the descendants of Seth in Babylonia. He lived 926 years, but some say he drank the water of life, (i.e., lived) 640 years, and one school says that he consoled the sorrows of the world, (i.e., reigned) for about a century.

MAHALALIL.

Mahalalil was the best of Kenan's sons. Kenan placed him on the throne when he himself had attained the age of 900. He ruled for 300 years. He lived either 928 or 840 or 895 years.

JARED (TEXT, Īrad.)

Jared was the most right-minded of the sons of Mahalalil and by his honoured father's orders, he administered the affairs of the world. He made canals and conduits, and attained the age of 962 or, according to some, of 967 years.

All these magnates of the household of fortune came into existence during Adam's lifetime.

ENOCH (TEXT, Ikhnūkh.)

Enoch is generally known as Idrīs, and was the distinguished son of Jared and born after Adam's death. Though the last-born of Jared's sons, he was, in wisdom and intelligence, older than all of them, and was before them all in felicity and understanding. He is the first lawgiver since the time of Seth. Some say that Idrīs was 100 years old at the time of Adam's death and some that he was 360 years. He was unrivalled in his knowledge of the science of government and the refinements of contrivance. Though some assign all sciences and arts to Adam, yet, according to most, astronomy, writing,161a spinning, weaving and sewing were introduced by Enoch. He learned wisdom from Agathodæmon161b of Egypt whom they call Uria the Second.

Among his lofty titles is that of Harmasu-l-harāmasa161c (Hermes of Hermeses or Trismegistus) and he is also called the third Uria. He attained high rank in theology and summoned162a mankind to worship in seventy-two languages. He founded 100162b cities, of which Madīna-i-roha162c was the least. It was a city of Mesopotamia (Jazā'ir) though some place it in the Ḥijāz (Petrœa Arabia). It was inhabited up to the time of Hulākū Khān who, it is said, destroyed it for the sake of the honour of the country and the well-being of the people.162d

He (Idrīs) instructed every tribe and every rank of mankind by a special procedure in accordance with their capacities. They say that he guided men to the reverence of the Great Light (the Sun) for most of them, before his time, were without his abounding wisdom and did not give thanks for that light of lights. He regarded it as the stock of visible and invisible fortune, and prescribed a great festival at the time of its passing162e from one Sign to another which is a special time of glory, and above all when it enters Aries. And whenever the planets, who are fed from the bounteous table of its rays, entered their own Houses or attained their exaltation, he regarded them as of special dignity, and gave thanks for the wonders of creation. Such seasons he looked upon as stations and manifestations of the favour of God, and he spent all his days in the service of holy spirits and pure forms.

He also built the pyramids of Egypt which are known as the Domes of Haramān (Gumbaẕ-i-haramān). And in those lofty buildings, all the arts and their tools have been depicted, so that if the knowledge of them be lost, it may be recovered. It is recorded that he deputed one of his nobles to lay the foundations of these pyramids whilst he himself traversed the entire world, eventually returning to Egypt.

Abū Ma‘shar163a of Balkh relates that there have been many Hermes but that three were preëminent;—(1). Harmasi-harāmasa (Hermes of Hermeses) or Idrīs whom the Persians call the grandson of Kayūmarṯ.163b (2). Hermes of Babylon who built Babylon after the Deluge. Pythagoras was one of his disciples. By the exertions of this Hermes of Babylon, the sciences which had been lost in Noah's Flood were resuscitated. His home was in the city of the Chaldeans (Kaldānīn)163c which is called the city of the philosophers (wise men) of the East (Madīna-i-filāsafa-i-mashriq). (3) The Hermes of Egypt who was the teacher of Esculapius (Asqlīnus).163d He too excelled in all sciences, especially in medicine and chemistry and spent much time in travel.

The birth-place of Harmasu-l-harāmasa (Idrīs) was Manīf (Memphis) now known by the name of Manūf,163e in the land of Egypt. Before the founding of Alexandria, it was called the city of philosophers, but when Alexander built that city,164a he brought the philosophers of Memphis and other places to Alexandria.

Among the sayings of Enoch is this, “The three164b most excellent things are truth when angry, bounty when poor and mercy when strong.” Wonderful stories are told in histories about his departure from this world, which wise men hesitate about accepting. One tradition is that he was then 865, another that he was 405 and a third that he was 365.

METHUSALAH.

Methusalah was the son of Enoch. He had many children, so that it is difficult to enumerate them. After his father, he was the head of his tribe and called men to Divine worship. When he was 900, he had a son whom he called Lamech. After that he lived 290 years.

LAMECH.

Lamech was the unique of his time for lofty character and exalted virtue. After his father, he became firmly seated on the throne. The period of his life was 780 years. And some call him Lamkān, Lāmak, and Lāmakh.

NOAH (NŪḤ).

Noah, the son of Lamech, was born under the Sign of Leo, 126 years after Adam's death. He was strong in the ways of religion and firmly based on the foundation of justice. The story of his calling164c mankind to the worship of God, the disobedience of his people and the event of the Flood, etc., are well-known.

Historians have mentioned three floods. First, a flood which occurred before our Adam came into existence. Thus165a the very learned Shahrazūrī says, “Adam belongs to the first cycle which commenced after the world had been devastated by the first flood.” The second flood was in the time of Noah and began at Kūfa, in the oven165b of Noah's house. It lasted six months, and there were eighty persons in the Ark (kishtī). On this account the place where they disembarked and settled was called the Eighty-Market165c (Sūqu-ṯ-ṯamānīn). The third165d flood was in the time of Moses and was confined to the Egyptians. Although romancing historians,165e in treating of the floods, make the last two also extend over the whole world, it is evident that this was not so, for in India,165f where they have books many thousand years old, there is not even a trace of these two floods. To be brief, in a short space of time, all the eighty occupants of the Ark died except seven, viz., Noah, his three sons, Japheth, Shem and Ham, and their wives. Noah assigned Syria, Mesopotamia, ‘Irāq and Khurāsān to Shem; the western countries, and Abyssinia, Indian, Scinde and the Sūdān165g to Ham; and China, Sclavonia166a and Turkistān to Japheth. And in the opinion of historians, the aboriginal inhabitants of those countries at the present day, are descended from these three, and the lineage of mankind from the days of the Flood is derived from them. Noah died when he was either 1600 or 1300 years old. There are other stories too about his age, such as that he lived for 250 or 350 years after the Flood and that he was born either 126 years after Adam's death or in Adam's last days, and that he sat upon the throne of guidance, (i.e., became a prophet) when he was 50, or 150, or 250, or 350 years old, and that he was a guide to mortals for 950 years.

Ham166b had nine sons, viz., Hind, Sind, Ẕanj (Zanzibar), Nūba, Canaan, Kush, Qabṭ (copt),166c Berber, Ḥabsh (Abyssinia), and some have written that Ham had six sons. They omit Sind and Canaan and make Nūba the son of Ḥabsh.

Shem also had nine sons, viz., (1) Arfakhshad,166d (2) Kayūmarṯ who is the progenitor of the kings of Persia, (3) Asūd166e who founded Madā'in166f (the twin-cities of Seleucia and Ctesiphon), etc., Ahwāz166g and Pahlū (? Peleg) are his sons and Fārs is the son of Pahlū, (4) Īghan166h the father of Shām (Syria) and Rūm (Asia Minor), (5) Būraj,166i of whom historians tell nothing except the name, (6) Lāüz (? Lud) from whom the Pharoahs of Egypt are descended, (7) Elam who built the cities of Khuzistān; Khurāsān and Tambāl166j are his sons, and ‘Irāq is the son of Khurāsān, and Kirmān (Carmania) and Makrān167a are sons of Tambāl, (8) Aram from whom the tribe of ‘Ād is descended, (9) Būẕar whose sons are Āẕarbaijān, Arān, Arman and Farghān.

Some say that Shem too had only six sons and omit Kayūmarṯ, Būraj and Lāüz. In short, there is much discrepancy about the descendants of those two (Shem and Ham).

JAPHETH. (YĀFIṮ.)

Japheth was the most just of Noah's sons. The lofty line of his Majesty, the king of kings, is linked with him, and the Khāns of the eastern cities and of Turkistān all derive from him. He is called the Father of Turk (Abū-l-turk), and some historians call him Alūnja Khān. When Japheth left Sūqu-ṯ-ṯamānīn with his wife and family, to go to the eastern and northern countries which had been assigned to him, he begged his father to teach him a prayer by which he might have rain whenever he wanted it. Noah gave him a stone which had the property of bringing rain, and indicated that he had pronounced over it the Ineffable Name167b (lit. Great Name) with the design that the foolish should not comprehend the matter and transgress his precepts, or perhaps he really recited the Ineffable Name over it. And at present there are many of these stones among the Turks which they call yedatāsh. The Persians call them sang-i-yada167c and the Arabs ḥajaru-l-maṭar, (rain-stone). And Japheth, on going to those regions, became a dweller in deserts, and whenever he wished, the cloud of God's bounty, came down in rain through the virtue of that stone. In course of time, children were born to Japheth and he established excellent laws among them, which were at once comforting to the short-thoughted and joy-increasing to lofty minds. He left eleven sons, viz., 1, Turk, 2, Cīn, 3, Ṣaqlāb, 4, Mansaj,168a also called Mansak, 5, Kamārī,168b also called Kaimāl, 6, Khalaj, 7, Khazan, 8, Rūs, 9, Sadsān, 10, Ghaz,168c 11, Yāraj.168d Some books mention only eight sons, omitting Khalaj, Sadsān and Ghaz.

TURK.

Turk was the eldest son of Japheth, and the Turks call him Yāfiṯ Ōghlān.168e He excelled all his brothers in wisdom, management and care for his subjects. On his father's death, he sat upon the throne of sovereignty and dispensed gentleness, manliness and relief of the oppressed. He settled in a place which the Turks call Sīl-ūk168f or Salīkāī and which had hot and cold springs and delightful meadows. He made dwellings of grass and wood and constructed tents, and made clothes by sewing together the skins (and furs) of beasts of burden and of prey. Salt168g was discovered in his time. One of his laws was that the son should inherit naught but a sword and that whatever was wanted should go to the daughter. They say he was contemporary with Kayūmarṯ, and that as the latter was the first king of Persia, so Turk was the first sultan of Turkistān. He lived to the age of 240.

ALINJA KHĀN.169a

Alinja Khān was the best of Turk's sons. When the measure of Turk's years was fulfilled, Alinja Khān was placed on the throne by the will of the chiefs. He made far-sighted wisdom his rule, and spent his days in the administration of justice. When he became old, he went into retirement (i.e., became a hermit).

DĪB BĀQŪĪ.169b

Dīb Bāqūī became king on his father's retirement and in accordance with his appointment.

KĪYŪK KHĀN.

Kīyūk was the worthy son of Dīb Bāqūi. When the father bade adieu to the world, he made over the throne of the Khānate to Kiyūk who, knowing the duties of sove eignty, acted up to them.

ALINJA KHĀN.

Alinja Khān was the son of Kīyūk and became heir-apparent in the end of his father's days. He was extravagant in his liberalities, and in his reign the Turks became intoxicated169c by the world and strayed from the path of wisdom. After a long time, twin-sons were born to him. One was named Mughul and the other Tātār. When they came to years of discretion, he divided his kingdom into two portions and gave one half to Mughul and one half to Tātār. When their illustrious father died, each of the two sons reigned in his own territory, in harmony with one other.

As this lofty line (Akbar's) has no connection with Tātār and his eightfold169d branches (i.e., generations) I pass them over and proceed to relate the history of Mughul and his noble descendants.

MUGHUL KHĀN.

Mughul Khān was a wise prince. He so conducted himself that the hearts of his subjects were attached and obedient to him and all tried to serve him properly. The generations of the Mughuls are nine in number, beginning with Mughul Khān and ending with Īl170a Khān. The Mughuls have taken the usage of Tuqūz170b (nine) from this, and they consider this number most excellent in all matters. The Creator bestowed on Mughul Khān four sons, Qarā Khān, Āẕar Khān, Kar Khān and Ūz Khān.

QARĀ KHĀN.170c

Qarā Khān was both the eldest son and preëminent in justice and the art of government. He sate upon the throne in succession to his illustrious father and made his summer (ailāq) and winter (qishlāq) quarters in Qarāqūm170d near two mountains called Irtāq170e and Kirtāq.

AGHŪZ171a
KHĀN.

Aghūz Khān was the worthy son of Qarā Khān, and was born of his chief wife during the time of his rule. Romancing story-tellers relate things about his naming himself and about his progress in the path of piety, which a just-judging intellect is not disposed to credit. He was admittedly an enlightened, pious and just ruler and framed excellent institutions171b and laws whereby the varied world was composed and the contrarieties of the Age conciliated. Among Turki kings, he was like Jamshīd among the kings of Persia. By his ripe wisdom, lofty genius, felicity and native courage, he brought under his sway the countries of Īrān (Persia) Tūrān,171c Rūm171d (Asia Minor), Egypt, Syria, Europe (Afranj),171e and other lands. Many nations came within the shadow of his benevolence, and he established titles among the Turks suitable to their ranks and which are on men's tongues to the present day, such as Aīghūr,172a Qanighlī, Qibcāq, (Kipcāk), Qārligh, Khalaj, etc. He had six sons, viz., Kūn (sun), Āī (moon), Yūlduz (star), Kōk (or Gōk) (sky), Tāgh (mountain), and Tangīz (sea). The three elders were called Buzmaq172b and the three others Ujūk. His sons and sons' sons became 24 branches, and all the Turks are descended from these magnates. The term Turkomān did not exist in old times, but when their posterity came to Persia (Īrān) and propagated there, their features came to resemble the Tājīks. But as they were not Tājīks, the latter called them Turkomāns, i.e., Turk-like. But some say that the Turkomāns are a distinct tribe and not related to the Turks. It is said that after Aghūz Khān had conquered the world, he returned to his own settlement (yūrat), and seating himself on the throne of dominion, held a Khusrū-like feast and conferred royal gifts on each of his fortunate sons, faithful officers and other servants, and promulgated lofty ordinances and excellent canons as guides for the perpetuation of prosperity. He laid it down that the right wing, which Turkomāns call Burānghār, and the succession should appertain to the eldest son and his descendants, and the left wing, i.e., the Jarānghār and the executive (wakālat) to the younger sons. And he decreed that this law should always be observed, generation after generation;—hence at the present day, one half of the twenty-four branches is associated with the right wing and one half with the left. He ruled for 72 or 73 years and then bade adieu to the world.

KUN KHĀN.

Kun Khān took his father's place, in accordance with his testament and acted in administration and government by his own acute understanding, and173a the sage counsels of Qabal173b Khwāja who had been Vizier to Aghūz Khān. He so arranged about his brothers, his children and his nephews—who were 24 in number, for each of the six brothers had four sons—that each recognized his position and assisted in the management of the State. Having reigned for 70 years, he appointed Āī Khān his successor and departed.

ĀĪ173c
KHĀN.

Āī Khān observed the laws of his illustrious father, adorned justice with amicability, and combined wisdom with good actions.

YULDŪZ KHĀN.

Yuldūz Khān was the eldest173d son and successor of Āī Khān. He attained high rank in world-sway and in the dispensing justice.

MANGALĪ KHĀN (MICHAEL).173e

Mangalī Khān was the beloved son of Yuldūz Khān and sate upon the throne in succession to him. He was distinguished for devotion to God, and for praising the pious.

TANGĪZ KHĀN.

Tangīz Khān conducted the affairs of sovereignty after his honoured father's death and wore the crown of dominion in Mughulistān for 110 years.

ĪL KHĀN.

Īl Khān was his noble son. When the father became old and weak, he gave Īl Khān the management of affairs, and alleging the number of his years as an excuse, went into solitary retirement.

QIYĀN.173f

Qiyān was the son of Īl Khān and, by the mysterious ordinances of Divine wisdom, he became a resting-place (maurid) of adversities. When the God of wisdom desires to bring a jewel of humanity to perfection, He first manifests sundry174a favours under the cover of disfavours of misfortune, and grants him the robe of existence after having made some great and pure-hearted ones his ransom and sacrifice (fidā). There is an instance of this in the story of Īl Khān who, after the turn of sovereignty came to him, was passing his life according to a code which provided for the control of the outer world and the contemplation of the world of reality, and was binding up the hearts of the distressed, until that Tūr, the son of Farīdūn, obtained sway over Turkistān, and Transoxiana (Mā-wārāu n-nahr) and in conjunction with Sunij Khān, the king of the Tātārs and Aighūrs, made a great war upon Īl Khān. The Mughul army, under the excellent dispositions of Īl Khān, made a desperate struggle, and many of the Turks, Tātārs and Aighūrs were slain. In the combat, Tūr and the Tātārs were unable to resist and fled. They took refuge in stratagems and vulpine tricks and dispersed. After going a little way, they hid in a defile, and then at the end of the night, suddenly made an onslaught on Īl Khān's army. Such a massacre took place that of Īl Khān's men not one escaped except his son Qiyān, his cousin Takūz174b and their two wives174c who had hidden themselves among the slain. At night, these four withdrew to the mountains and with many troubles and difficulties, traversed the valleys and ravines, and came to a meadow which had salubrious springs and fruits in abundance. In their helpless state, they regarded this pleasant spot as a godsend and settled in it. The Turks call it Irganaqūn and say that the terrible calamity happened 1000 years after the death of Aghūz Khān.

The sage knows that in this wondrous destiny there lay the plan for the production of that all-jewel, his Majesty, the king of kings, so that the status of sacrifice might be attained and also that the ascents of banishment, seclusion, and hardship might, in this strange fashion, be brought together to the end that the unique pearl, his Majesty, the king of kings,—who is the final cause of the creation of the glorious series (ṭabaqa) and also the material for this record of Divine praise,—might become the aggregate of all the stages of existence and be acquainted with the grades of humanity, which might thus arise,—and should achieve spiritual and temporal success, and that in this way there be no defective round (girdī) on the periphery of his holiness.

In fine, after Qiyān and his companions had settled in that place, they begat children and grew into tribes. Those who sprang from Qiyān were called Qiyāt and those who descended from Takūz were called Darlgīn. No account is forthcoming of the descendants of Qiyān while they were in Irganaqūn—a period of about 2,000 years. Presumably in that place and age reading and writing were not practised. After the lapse of about 2000 years and in the last period of Nūshīrwān's175a reign, the Qiyāt and Darlgīn desired to leave the place, as it was not large enough for them. A mountain which was a mine of iron barred their way at the beginning. Able minds devised deer-skin bellows (gawazn, perhaps elk) and with these they melted that iron mountain and made a way. Then they rescued their country from the hands of the Tātārs and others, by the sword, and contriving vigour, and became firmly seated on the throne of success and world-rule. From the circumstance that in four175b thousand years previous to this event, (i.e., the emigration from Irganaqūn) there were twenty-eight lofty ancestors and twenty-five in the millenium after it, sagacious calculators conjecture that during these two thousand years (spent in Irganaqūn) there were twenty-five ancestors.

Be176a it remembered that Mughulistān is to the eastward and far from civilization. Its circuit is seven or eight months' journey. On the east, its boundary extends to Cathay (Khiṭā) and on the west, to the country of the Aīghūrs; on the north, it touches Qargaz and Salīkā (? Kirghiz and Selenga) and on the south, it adjoins Tibet. The food of its people is the produce of hunting and fishing and their clothing the skins and fur of wild and tame animals.

TĪMŪR TĀSH.

Tīmūr Tāsh is of the auspicious stock of Qiyān. He was exalted by sovereignty and command.

MANGALĪ KHWĀJA.

Mangalī Khwāja is the worthy son of Tīmūr Tāsh. He exalted the crown of dominion and auspiciousness and possessed the dīvān of power and justice.

YULDŪZ KHĀN.

Yuldūz Khān was the high-thoughted successor of Mangalī Khwāja who at the coming out of the Qiyāt and Darlgīn was the chief and leader. From the time of Qiyān, his (Qiyān's) descendants had reigned generation after generation in Irganaqūn. Yuldūz Khān, by the help of the fortunate star of his dominion, gradually emerged from the horizon and civilized the tribes of the Mughuls. He was powerful and magnanimous and among the Mughul families, he is counted of good blood and fashion who can trace his origin up to Yuldūz Khān.

JŪĪNA177a
BAHĀDUR.

Jūīna Bahādur was the worthy son of Yūldūz Khān and when the cup of his father's years was full, sate on the throne of world-government.

Ṣāḥib-qirān. This title which properly belongs to Tīmūr and was afterwards bestowed on Shāh Jahān, seems to be applied here to Akbar because, according to the Indian horoscope (viz., No. 2.), Jupiter and Venus were in conjunction at his birth. (See text 28, l.6.) The title may however, mean only Lord of epochs.

↩

Maulānā Cānd also cast the horoscope of Jahāngīr (Salīm) in the 14th year of Akbar, 977 = 1570. Text II. 346.) He is mentioned in Jai Singh's preface to the Muḥammad Shāhī Tables, under the name of Mullā Cānd, and as the author of the Taṣhīlāt-i-Akbar Shāhī. (Dr. Hunter, Asiatic Researches, V. 177.)

↩

Ulugh Beg Mīrzā was a grandson of Tīmūr and son of Shāhrukh. For information about his Tables see the works of Hyde, Greaves and Sédillot. He was born in 1393 and put to death by his own son in 1449. His Tables were first published in 1437. See Jarrett II. 5n., and an interesting paragraph and note in Erskine's Bābar (51.)

↩

I have added the numbers of the Houses to the diagram, and have inserted the date of birth. It will be seen that there is a difference of form between the horoscope as here given and the more elaborate diagrams to be found in European books. In the latter, the observer is supposed to be looking south and the First House or Ascendant is on his left hand. In the horoscopes of the text, the observer appears to be looking east, for the First House or Ascendant is in front of him.

Although I have used capital letters for the designation of the Signs, it should be remembered that the Houses are those of the figure and not of the heavens, i.e., they are mundane and not celestial. They do not correspond exactly with the celestial Houses, for the First House, i.e., the Ascendant or horoscope, and which is that of life, begins at 7° of Virgo.

↩

This is the Greek ◌. The signs of the Zodiac were divided into three groups, viz., Tropical, Fixed and Bicorporal. Each group contained four Signs and the list is as follows:—

Tropical.Fixed.Bicorporal.
Aries.Taurus.Gemini.
Cancer.Leo.Virgo.
Libra.Scorpio.Sagittarius.
Capricornus.Aquarius.Pisces.

Astrologers also divided the Signs into three groups of four each, thus:—

Tropical.Aries.Cancer.Libra.Capricornus.
Fixed.Taurus.Leo.Scorpio.Aquarius.
Bicorporal.Gemini.Virgo.Sagittarius. Pisces.

A. F. seems to say that the term bicorporal, like common, meant that a Sign possessed the properties of the Signs on either side of it; e.g., Virgo was bicorporal because between the Fixed Leo and the Tropical Libra.

The Signs were also divided into Tropical, Fixed, Equinoctial and Bicorporal: and into Moveable, Fixed and Common. Acccording to Lilly's “Christian Astrology,” the Bicorporal Signs were those represented by two bodies, such as Gemini and Pisces. Sagittarins is bicorporal because a centaur. But Virgo is also bicorporal, as may be seen from the table in Albīrūnī's India (Sachau, II. 218). Apparently this is because the figure was regarded as that of a hermaphrodite. Lilly (86. 2nd. ed. 1659) says “Signs are constituted between moveable and fixed and retain a property or nature partaking both with the preceding and consequential Sign.” So also Ptolemy says, “The Bicorporal Signs severally follow the Fixed Signs; and being thus intermediately placed between the Fixed and Tropical Signs, they participate in the constitutional properties of both from their first to their last degree.” (Tetrabiblos, Ashmand, 35.) This explains A. F.'s description of Virgo, for she is between the Fixed Leo and the Tropical Libra. Lilly (96) describes Virgo as a “barren Sign, but also human,” and as “an earthly, cold, melancholy, barren, feminine, nocturnal, southern (northern?) Sign, the house and exaltation of ☿ (Mercury), of the earthly triplicity.”

↩

◌, juzw-i-ṭāli‘, i.e., part or degree of the Ascendant or horoscope. I think it here means cusp, i.e., the place where the House begins. The phrase occurs again in the text, 30. l.2.

↩

Badāonī (Lowe, 269), mentions that on the festival of the 8th of Virgo, Akbar used to show himself marked on the forehead like a Hindu, and had strings of jewels tied on his wrists by Brahmans. Apparently this was because it was the anniversary of his birth. The 8th degree of Virgo might correspond to 8th Ābān.

↩

Each Sign contains 30° and is divided into three parts of 10° each. It may be noted that 7° 7' Virgo is said to be Mercury's term. A.F. here calls these parts thirds, but they are commonly called decanates or faces.

↩

The Signs are also divided into four groups or triplicities, corresponding to the four elements. Taurus, Virgo and Capricornus constitute the earthy triplicity.

↩

Referring to the Ptolemaic notion of the earth's being fixed and in the centre of the universe.

↩

Jupiter is called Sa‘d-i-Akbar or the Greater Fortune (Fortuna Major) and Venus Sa‘d-i-Aṣghar or the Lesser Fortune (Fortuna Minor.) Saturn and Mars are called the Infortunes.

↩

Mercury is regarded as a planet of mixed disposition and the character of his influence depends on his associate. Here, because he is near Jupiter, he is benefic. Virgo is his House and place of exaltation. According to the Lucknow editor, his culmination or highest point of exaltation is 7° 4' Virgo, but according to the Jyōtiṣa-Prakāça it is 15°. Haly in his De judiciis astrorum says (16), Mercurius fortunatus est cum fortunatis, et infortunatus, cum infortunatis.

↩

Libra is the diurnal House of Venus, while it is the hubūṭ or fall of the Sun. Hence the distich in the Anwār-i-Suhailī (Cap: IX. Story 3. 417. Hertford ed.) “Libra is the mansion of the star of amusement and joy, but the fall of the king of the planets. (sc. the Sun.) There is another astrological allusion in the same story, (416) where it is said that certain sailors made, like the Moon, their mansion in a watery tower (burj). I believe this refers to the fact that the Moon's mansion is Cancer which is a watery Sign, i.e., belongs to the watery triplicity of Cancer, Scorpio and Pisces.

↩

The Second House is that of fortune, wealth, or property, the First being that of life.

↩

The technical name for the subject of a horoscope.

↩

◌ taswiyat. In the dictionaries, this word is defined as meaning making equal or parallel. Here it refers to the division of the horoscope into twelve parts or Houses. “There are two kinds of Houses in astrology,” says Wilson in his Dictionary of Astrology, “mundane and planetary. Mundane Houses are each a twelfth part of a figure (a horoscope) and begin their number at the east angle which is the First House (Ascendant), and proceed according to the order of the Signs. The Second House is the left, under the Earth, and is what they call Succedent, because it succeeds to the angle. The Third is to the left of the Second and is called Cadent, because it falls from the angle of the Fourth. The Fourth is the north angle or Imum Coeli.”

The full expression appears to be ◌ taswiyatu-l-buyūt—and not merely taswiyat as in the text. Chapter XII of Ulugh Beg's Prologomena (Part III. Sédillot 141) is headed ◌ and Sédillot translates this (198), “Déterminer la distribution régulière des douze maisons célestes.” It appears from Rieu's Catalogue of Arabic MSS. (Suppl. 519a), that there is a chapter in Albīrūnī's Canon Masudicus (Fol. 242b), on the Taswiyatu-l-buyūt. See also, for the full expression, Akbarnāma II. 711. 2 and 4 fr. foot. Cf. also Bādshāhnāma of ‘Abdu-l-ḥāmid (99 1.4 fr. foot), where reference is made to the two ḥisābs or modes of calculation. But taswiyat alone also occurs there. (I. 103, 1.9.) Of course the Houses of a horoscope seldom or never exactly correspond with the Signs, for they are counted from the degree and minute which is ascending at the time of birth. The author means here that Mercury is in the Second House of the figure and also, in the Second Sign counting from Virgo, viz., Libra,—for, as the mundane and celestial do not correspond, Mercury might have been in the Second House of the figure and yet in the Third Sign, counting from the Ascendant.

↩

Though Venus be feminine, she is spoken of as Ṣāḥib, i.e., lord or master.

↩

Lit. building up of the world.

↩

Sixty degrees or two Houses, i.e., one-sixth of the heavens, apart.

↩

The author seems to have forgotten that he had already mentioned this circumstance. See supra.

↩

Referring to the Sun's control of times, and seasons.

↩

◌ hubūṭ, fall, i.e., the House opposite to, or six Houses apart from, the House of exaltation. Libra is the House of the Sun's fall, as being opposite to the House of exaltation, viz., Aries. The author says that, as the Sun has emerged from Libra and entered Scorpio, he has left his fall and is proceeding towards his exaltation in Aries.

↩

◌ Nāẓir. The aspect is one of opposition or 180° which is regarded by astrologers as malefic. I do not therefore see the appropriateness of A.F.'s remark unless indeed, he is using the word nāẓir in a non-technical sense and merely as meaning one who beholds or inspects. There is a reference to the aspects in Paradise Lost X. 656.

To the blanc Moon Her office they prescribed, to the other five Their planetary motions and aspects In Sextile, Square, and Trine and Opposite Of noxious efficacy.

↩

I do not feel sure of the meaning here. It is perhaps, the standards who are represented as illuminating the world,—the allusion being to the royal flag or standard's bearing a picture of the sun. See Blochmann Sayyid Aḥmad's Plates, IX. Figure I. The kaukabah (fig. 2) has a sphere suspended from it which apparently represents the Sun. See Blochmann's quotation from Terry IX.

↩

◌, safar. This word, like the German Reise, means both travel and war and A.F. probably intended to take advantage of the equivoque. There seems also an antithesis intended between the words safar and kanaf, ◌ region or country. The standards of victory are abroad on the march while the Sun (Akbar) remains in the region of light-giving and protecting. The literal translation is “he (i.e., the Sun or Akbar) (is in) the region of protecting and guarding and is giving light to the world.” There is a similar passage in the Bādshāhnāma (102 top line et seq.) but there is an interesting difference in the mode of treatment. The Ninth House is also that of religion. A.F. passes over this point but the caster of Shāh Jahān's horoscope lays stress on it and infers from the fact of Venus (whom he calls the planet of Islām) being in aspect towards the Ninth House that Shāh Jahān will be an upholder of religion and a faithful follower of Muḥammad. In Shāh Jahān's horoscope, the position noticed in Akbar's is reversed, the Third House being Taurus, i.e., that of Venus, and the Ninth being Scorpio.

↩

There is a similar play on the two words in Badāonī. (Lowe 71.) The expression is used there with reference to Akbar's maternal uncle, Khwāja Mu‘aẓẓam who certainly was a scorpion-relative.

↩

There are four angles or cardinal points, viz., the First, Fourth, Seventh and Tenth Houses of a horoscope. The Arabic name is ◌ watad lit.: tent-pole. They are the most important houses in a figure, the First being the Ascendant, the Fourth its nadir, i.e., the north angle or hypogeum; the Seventh, the west or descendant angle, being opposite to the First, and the Tenth being the Mid-heaven. Sagittarius is Jupiter's House and gaudium.

↩

Muttaṣil. This is perhaps a technical term and refers to a planet's applying to another planet.

↩

‘Uṭārid-i-mas‘ūd. Mercury is called mas‘ūd, benefited or auspicious, because he has become benefic by proximity to Jupiter and Venus. See Albīrūnī (Sachau II. 212.)

↩

◌ ḥadd. The degrees of each sign are divided among the five planets, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus and Mercury, and those assigned to each are called its term (terminus). The term is one of a planet's essential dignities and tables of terms, showing the degrees assigned to each planet, are to be found in all astrological books.

↩

This is the fiery triplicity, consisting of Aries, Leo and Sagittarius. Jupiter is lord of this triplicity during the night and so, was its lord at the time of Akbar's birth.

↩

According to Haly (p. 2) Capricorn is a sign of few sons. It is Mars' House of exaltation. Haly's words are: Signa multorum filiorum Pisces, Cancer, Scorpio; paucorum filiorum, Aries, Taurus, Sagittarius, Capricornus et Libra.

↩

◌ kadkhudā-i-ṭāli‘. The word kadkhudā perhaps has the sense of the Alcochoden of medieval times. It seems to mean the planet in a horoscope which has most dignities in a hylegiacal place. Alcochoden is sometimes defined as the Arabic word for hyleg. (See note infra on hyleg.) According to Vullers' Dictionary, s. v., kadkhudā means, in astrology, the soul or vital principle in opposition to kadbānū, the body. See Mafātīḥu-l-‘ulūm, 331. It would seem that kadkhudā corresponds to the term “lord of the geniture,” and means a planet in possession of all its dignities, essential and accidental. Such a planet is said to be mubtazz (from ibtizāz). Velschius in his Commentarius in Roznāma Naurus (1676) identifies kadkhudā with hyleg. The Burhān-i-qāṭi‘ states that kadbānū is equivalent to the Greek hailāj (hyleg). Kadkhudā means paterfamilias and kadbānū, materfamilias and so, Vullers suggests that hailāj may be the Greek ◌, but I believe the derivation from ◌ is correct.

Apparently what is meant here, by the Ascendant's being a centre of the laws of life, is that the Ascendant or First House is the House of Life.

↩

I take this expression to mean merely that the First House is that of life, but there may be an allusion to the Fardars,—the Alfridaria of Cardan, and the true translation may be, “a lord of the geniture who is the centre of the code of life,”—alluding to the fact of Mars' governing the years from 28 to 35.

↩

◌ wajh. This is the Greek ◌. It is the third part of a sign (10°) and thus corresponds to the decanate. The word face is also commonly used in English books on astrology. Dozy (II. 7852) says, s.v. wajh, “Les astrologues partagent chaque signe du zodiaque en trois faces, de dix degrés chacune. Les trente-six faces sont assignées, chacune à une des planètes ou au soleil ou à la lune.” Salmon, however, in his Horae Mathematicae divides each Sign of the Zodiac into six faces of 5° each. See Tetrabiblos, Ashmand 28n. The above is what is meant by the term face as applied to a Sign, but the word has another meaning as applied to a planet. Ashmand (l. c. 54) says, “Each planet is said to be in its proper face, when the aspect it holds to the Sun or Moon is similar to that which its own House bears to their Houses, for example, Venus is in her proper face when making a sextile aspect to either luminary, provided she be occidental to the Sun, but oriental to the Moon, agreeably to the primary arrangement of her Houses. And it follows that Saturn is in his proper face when he is five Signs, or in quintile, after the Sun or before the Moon; that Jupiter is so in trine; Mars when in quartile; Venus when in sextile; and Mercury when only one Sign (or, in modern phrase, semi-sextile) after the Sun or before the Moon.” Similarly Wilson (Dic. of Astr.) says, “a planet is in its face when it is at the same distance from the Sun or Moon as its House is from their Houses and in the same succession of Signs.” Probably when A. F. speaks of the wajh of a planet, he means this kind of face and not the third part of a Sign, which he designates by darījān decanate.

↩

The earthy triplicity, consisting of Taurus, Virgo and Capricornus.

↩

On the meaning of this word, see Note I. at the end of this Chapter, page 82.

↩

On the meaning of this word, see Note II. at the end of this Chapter, page 82.

↩

◌ aṯnā‘asharīah, a twelfth part or two and a half degrees of a Sign; the ◌ of the Greeks. Scaliger refers to it in his notes on Manilius (Leyden ed. 179), and a table of Twelfths is given in Bengali books on astrology. The planet which rules the Sign is lord of the First Twelfth; the rulers of the two following Signs are lords of the second, and third, and so on. Thus Mars is lord of the first dodecatemorion of Aries, he being regent of Aries; Venus lord of the second, as being ruler of Taurus; and Mercury is ruler of the third, as regent of Virgo. The expression twelfth part is explained in Dict. of T. Ts. (I. 185). Ashmand (50) says the Twelfth of a Sign is technically called a place. The Persians call it ◌ duwāzda bahra.

↩

Bib. Ind. ed. I.14. The Fifth House is that of children. The Fifth House of Tīmūr's horoscope was Taurus, and Jupiter was there as well as Mars, while Venus was in the Third House (Pisces.) Tīmūr, like Augustus was born under Capricorn. His nativity, as cast by Ashmole, will be found in Hyde's Syntagma (II. 466) as pointed out by Gibbon.

↩

The heaven of the Moon is that nearest the earth, and therefore she is regarded as a link between the heavens and the earth. She is also the distributor of light from the heavenly bodies to the earthy ones. See Akbarnāma II. 8, l.14. Haly calls the Moon, the Alguazil, i.e., the Vizier or Prime Minister of the Sun.

↩

◌ zā'idu-n-nūr. This is an epithet of the Moon. She is also called the swift-goer, sarī‘u-s-sair, in opposition, perhaps, to Saturn who is called the slow-goer. (Akbarnāma II. 10 1.8.)

Hyleg is a word well-known in European astrology and comes from the Greek ◌. It signifies the foundation or beginning of life and also the duration of life. Sédillot says (Prolegomena, Text 149). “Ce mot signifie le lieu de la vie; il est pris dans le sens de durée de la vie.” Hyleg is also defined as the Moderator, Significator or Prorogator of life.

Moxon says (Mathematical Dictionary). “Hyleg or hylech, an Arabic word signifying the Giver of life; a planet or part of heaven which, in a man's nativity becomes, in an astrological sense, the moderator or significator of his life; hence hylegiacal places are such as when a planet happens to be posited therein, he may be said to be hyleg or to have the government of life attributed to him; which places are commonly reckoned five, viz., the Ascendant, the Mid-heaven, the Seventh House, the Ninth and the Eleventh House. Also the Sun, Moon and Part of Fortune.

The question of hylegiacal places is one much discussed in astrological books. In the text the word is perhaps used as an equivalent for kadbānū, the body as opposed to the soul, kadkhudā. Sachau (Chronology of Ancient Nations) has translated it by materfamilias. There is a curious note in Schefer's Chresthomatie Persane (I. 102) where he says that hyleg is the Arabic form of the Persian hailāj which signifies master of the house or head of the family. And he mentions a book by Abu Mashar of Balkh bearing the title Kitābu-l-Hailāj. M. Schefer supposes that this book must have treated of domestic economy, but it is almost certain it was an astrological work. Haly says (147) that Ptolemy established five hylegs, viz., the Sun, the Moon, the Ascendant, the Part of Fortune and the Place of Conjunction or Opposition of the Sun and Moon prior to the birth. The Moon was probably the hyleg in Akbar's horoscope because his birth took place at night.

The hyleg was also called aphēta and was opposed to anairēta, destroyer.

↩

Anabibazon, the ascending node of the Greeks and Rāhu of the Hindus.

↩

Cardan (De judiciis geniturarum. Nuremburg 1547. 79b.) gives the first seven degrees of Pisces as the term of Venus.

↩

Venus is the noctural lord of the watery triplicity or trigon, viz., Cancer, Scorpio and Pisces, for the last is her House of exaltation.

↩

If ādarjān be the same as decanate, I do not see how the seventh degree falls within the ādarjān of Venus, for the rule is that the first decanate of a Sign belongs to the lord of that Sign and the lord of Pisces is not Venus but Jupiter. Pisces is, however, the House of Venus' exaltation, and its 27th degree is said to be the ◌, auj, of Venus. Perhaps the reference is to this. Possibly A. F. used the word ādarjān without understanding it.

↩

The Seventh House is that of marriage.

↩

The Eighth House is one of misfortune and danger. Hence the need for the Divine protection. To be in trine is to be 120°, four Houses, apart.

↩

“An imaginary point in the heavens supposed to contain equal power with the luminaries.” (Wilson, 306). In the Tetrabiblos (Ashmand) we read that the Part of Fortune is calculated by counting the number of degrees between the Sun and Moon.

↩

Katabibazon, the descending node of the Greeks; Kētu of the Hindus. It is where the Moon crosses the ecliptic on her way south.

↩

This appears to be a translation of the Greek ◌. It may be rendered judgments.

↩

Later on, we find the horoscopes of the three princes, Salīm (Jahāngīr), Murād and Dānyāl, cast both according to the Greek and the Indian rules. There is also a horoscope of the Accession.

↩

Akbar said that the Sun specially favoured kings and that this was why they worshipped it,—thereby scandalizing the shallow-minded. (Jarrett III, 388. Blochmann 155. Text 154 1.16.)

↩

◌ panja. There is a play on the double-meaning of this word, panja meaning both rays and paws and also footprints, viz., those of Leo. Punja also means, in Hindi, a cluster, e.g., of stars.

↩

Lit. have consumed, the past tense being used for the future in accordance with the Persian idiom.

↩

Perhaps this is an allusion to the story of Kṛṣṇa's having burnt off 998 of the 1,000 arms of Bāṇāsura at the place called Kardaha.

↩

This seems to be a title and not the name of an individual. See Blochmann 404n. where he compares the title of Jotik Rai—Court Astrologer, to Birbal's title of Kab Rai —Poet Laureate. The Sanscrit word is Jyautiṣika—one who knows the Jyōtiṣa. The expression Jyōtish Rai is used in Jai Singh's preface and is translated Astronomer Royal by Dr. Hunter.

↩

Or, alongside of, or, together with.

↩

◌ jabrūt, omnipotence, etc. It is a word used by Ṣūfīs.

↩

◌ safar. It is probably intended that this word should have its Sufistic meanings also, viz., self-examination and thinking of the other world.

↩

Farāham āmada. This may mean conjunction or only that both planets are in the same Sign.

↩

There is here a sketch of Akbar's personal appearance but it is very vague. See later on in Amīr Fatḥu-l-lāh's horoscope.

↩

Apparently because the Sun is regent of the First House or Ascendant.

↩

The Third House is that of brethren. The meaning is that as the Sun is in the Third House, the star of brethren is occulted or combust.

↩

Libra is Saturn's House of exaltation.

↩

The nigri barri of Horace. (Āīn III. 241 and Jarrett III. 395.) Akbar said that when he first came to India he looked upon his liking (tawajjuh) for elephants as a prognostic of his universal ascendency.

↩

Alluding to the extent of his orbit which was then the largest known. Çani or Çanaiçcara, the Sanscrit name for Saturn means the slow (goer).

↩

I.e., apparently the fiery triplicity to which both Leo and Sagittarius belong.

↩

According to Cardan, Jupiter is not friendly to Mars; but according to the Jyōtiṣa Prakāça, they are friends.

↩

Iqtibās. According to Sylvestre de Sacy, it originally meant to borrow fire from another's hearth.

↩

Being the opposite of her mansion which is Cancer.

↩

Apparently referring to the fact that Jupiter and Venus are in the House next to the Ascendant.

↩

Perhaps ◌, they will have.

↩

◌ ibtizāz. A friend suggested to me that this was a mistake for ◌ ibtirāz, superiority, and this view appeared to be confirmed by the fact that ibtirāz is the reading of MS. 564. It turns out, however, that ibtizāz is correct, it being an astrological term signifying a planet possessed of all its dignities and appearing in the horoscope (or perhaps in the First House). (See Dict. of T. Ts. I. 224 s. v. and the Mafātīḥu-l-‘ulūm 229). The next clause of the text is also an astrological term, ◌ sharaf, a planet in exaltation. The whole phrase is shahādat-i-ibtizāz u sa‘ādat-i-sharaf.

↩

The text has zā'ica, horoscope, but the list of errata shows that this is a misprint for ◌ rā'iḥat, lit. odour or smell.

↩

Apparently Jupiter and Venus are meant. They have already been spoken of as meeting in the Second House, viz., Virgo.

↩

Nuhbahr, nine parts. It means the dividing a Sign into nine parts of 3° 20' each, and assigning a planet to each part. Albīrūnī (Sachau. II. 222) gives a rule for calculating the nuhbahrāt.

Nuhbahr is the Sanscrit navāṁsa. The Lucknow editor gives (27) a table shewing the arrangement of the nuhbahr. It seems to have been a refinement of Indian astrologers and is not, I believe, referred to by Ptolemy. Carden in the peroration of his work on Astrological Aphorisms, takes credit to himself for discarding nuhbahr, etc. His words are “Abjecimus partes, facies, novenaria, dodecatemoria, horas planetarias, atque caetera id genus nugamenta.”

The Indian book to which A.F. refers, appears to be the Bṛhat Jātaka of Varāha Mihira. In N. Chidambaran Iyer's translation thereof, I find the following passage. (Madras, 1885, 114.) “The Lagna (Ascendant) or the Moon, being in Vargōttama position of (sic) all the planets, excepting the Moon, by the several groups of four, five and six planets, aspecting the Lagna or the Moon, the number of Yōga (s) obtained is 22.” See also the Bṛhajjātakam (Rasik Mohan Chatterji's ed. Calcutta, 1300 B.S. 79a.) An explanation is there given of how the number 22 is arrived at and the çlōka is explained as giving a total of 44 kingdoms or rājayōga(s). There being seven planets,—the Sun is one of them,—and the Moon being excluded, we get the number, 6, mentioned above.

Monier Williams' Sanscrit Dictionary defines rājayōga as “a constellation under which princes are born, or a configuration of planets, etc., at the birth of any person, indicating him to be destined to kingship.”

The Vargōttama above referred to is defined as follows: (Iyer 10). “In the moveable and other Signs, the first, the central and the last” (i.e., the First, Fifth and Ninth) “navāṁsa (s) are known as Vargōttama positions. Planets in such positions will produce good effects.” The chapter in which this passage occurs, is that dealing with rājayōga or the birth of kings. Yōga, however, also means conjunction.

Blochmann (105) has the following passage:—“At the command of his Majesty, Muḥammad Khān of Gujrāt translated into Persian, the Tājik, a well-known work on astrology.” (The original is at page 116 of the Bib. Ind. ed. and the notes give the various reading nājak). Gladwin similarly read tājik, but in a copy of his translation in the British Museum, Sir W. Jones has written the marginal emendation jātak. Probably this is correct. There is, it is true, a book or a—Çāstra on Hindu astrology, called the Tājik-grantha, but this was, as its name implies, a translation from the Persian. See Weber's Indische Studien II. 247. Dr. Weber is inclined to derive the word from Tājik—Arabian—and to suppose that the original language was Arabic, but there seems no reason to go further back than to Persian. Tājik is a well-known name for a Persian, hence probably the title of the Indian book. It is not likely that any Persian would take the trouble to translate from the Sanscrit a work which was itself a translation from the Persian. I therefore think the proper reading must be Jātak. The two words might easily be confounded in writing.

With reference to A. F.'s remark about the five planets being in aspect to the Moon, it may be pointed out that they are not all in one house, so that they all cannot have the same aspect. It will be remembered that the Sun was regarded as a planet by the ancients.

↩

It does not appear that Akbar ever possessed 22 kingdoms. His ṣūbahs (provinces) were originally twelve and became fifteen by the conquest of Berar, Khāndēsh, and Aḥmadnagar. (Jarrett II. 115). However on the same page, A. F. speaks of hoping to add Central Asia and Persia, etc., to the list. It is curious that under Shāh Jahān, the provinces numbered 22. (Tieffenthaler Berlin, 1786. I. 66). Bernier's list makes the number 20 only, but he includes Bengal and Orissa as one.

In the Bṛhajjātakam referred to in the previous note, the Sanscrit çlōka is thus given:—

◌: |

◌: ǁ

This may, apparently, be translated as follows:—“If the Ascendant” (i.e., the horoscope or point on the eastern horizon) “or the Moon be in Vargōttama, and four or more planets, exclusive of the Moon, be in aspect thereto, the Native will be king of two-and-twenty kingdoms.”

The editor proceeds to explain in Bengali, how this figure is arrived at; viz., by making different combinations of the planets. The figure 44 is reached by counting 22 for the case of the Ascendant's being in Vargōttama and being aspected by the planets, and 22 for the similar case of the Moon.

We are told that by some other manipulation of the figures, the number of kingdoms may rise to 528, i.e., 22×24. Apparently A.F. claims more than 22 for Akbar and reaches at the least 44,—for he says that both the Ascendant and the Moon are in nuhbahr, though, to be sure, he does not say that both are aspected by five planets. Apparently he shrinks from specifying the number of the kingdoms just as he shrinks from telling us anything about the time of Akbar's death. It is a case of Imperium sine fine dedi. Nor does A.F. take notice of the fact that the çlōka speaks of “Vargōt tama,”—a word which means chief of a class and is only applied to three out of the nine navāṁsa positions.

↩

See to this effect the Bengali astrological work, Jyotish Parkāsh, Part II. 55.

↩

The text has ◌ sa‘d-i-aṣghar, i.e., the Lesser Fortune or Venus, but the editors admit that eight out of their nine authorities read sa‘d-i-akbar (Jupiter.) They have adopted the reading of a single MS. because Venus and not Jupiter is lord of Libra, i.e., the Third House. I think this reason sufficient for the emendation, although A. F.'s language where he speaks of the planet's signifying a “great Khilāfat and majestic Government” agrees better with Jupiter and would seem to imply that Jupiter was in his thoughts. However Venus is a much more respectable and important divinity with Orientals than she is in the West. She is called the planet of Islām (Bādshāhnāma 102, 1.2) and she ruled over Arabia—so the reference to the Khilāfat may not be inappropriate. According to the Dabistān (III. 107 trans.) Muḥammad worshipped Venus and for this reason, fixed Friday for the sacred day, “as he would not reveal the meaning to the common people, he kept it secret.” This explanation of the choice of Friday for the sacred day is contrary to that commonly received, which is that Friday was the most excellent of days because the last of Creation and that on which man was made. Shāh Jahān's horoscope was under Libra and also Jahāngīr's. It is just possible that A. F. may have been thinking of Saturn who is in his exaltation in Libra.

↩

I think ◌ wujūd-i-ashraf-i-ō must mean Humāyūn's existence in heaven and not Akbar's birth, else why should the aid be secret or mysterious? Guido Bonatus mentions (636) that the second part of the Fourth House is that of the death of ancestors. A. F. alludes to the Fifth House because that is the House of children.

↩

According to A. F. (Blochmann 51) Akbar knew more about music than trained musicians and was an excellent performer, especially on the naqqārah, kettledrum.

↩

Saturn is an infortune. The Third House is that of brethren and the author infers from Saturn's presence in it that Akbar will be great through his own exertions and that his brethren will not help him. Akbar's half-brother, Muḥammad Ḥakīm (born 961=1553) the ruler of Afghānistān was ungrateful and rebellious and also a drunkard. See Akbar's remarks about him, Jarret III. 383. There was another half-brother, Ṣultān Ibrāhīm who died in infancy. (Akbarnāma I. 332.)

↩

I take ◌ to be nashd, the verbal noun signifying information, etc., and also used as a form of adjuration and entreaty. It may, however, be nashud, “was not.”

↩

The Eighth House is that of inheritance. See Bādshāhnāma 34 1, 8 from foot.

↩

This is the House of friends.

↩

According to astrology, the Moon is lord of the ocean. A statement not without its truth.

↩

Arm of the State. From Shīrāz, he went to the Deccan and joined Akbar's Court in 991=1583. We find Akbar consulting him as an astrologer, about the troubles in Gujrāt (Akbarnāma III, 431). Perhaps the title ‘Aẓdu-d-daulah was given to or assumed by Fatḥu-l-lāh in allusion to the Buyide prince, ‘Aẓdu-d-daulah Alp Arslan, who reigned in Khurāsān in the 10th century and was a patron of astronomers. (See Sédillot). There is a Canon (Set of Tables) named after him, ‘Aẓadī. (See Jarrett II. 8 and Blochmann 33n).

↩

He arranged the coinage in the 29th year, 1585 (Blochmann 33).

↩

At first sight, it appears as if the entries in this diagram were not correct, for Mercury is set down as being in Virgo, whereas the text (33 1.7.) describes him as in 25° 24' Libra. Similarly the Dragon's Tail (Katabibazon) is in Leo, and not in Cancer; and the Sun (Text 33 l.9. fr. foot) in Scorpio and not in Libra.

But it should be remembered that the Houses or compartments of the figure are mundane Houses (Houses of the horoscope) and so, overlap the Signs. All that is meant by putting the name of a Sign into one of the Compartments is that the cusp or boundary of the House is in that Sign. The First House for example does not begin till nearly the last degree (viz., 28°) of Leo. Apparently the entries in the figure misled Kavi Rāj Shyāmal Dās, for he speaks of some of the horoscopes as marking the Sun in Libra and others in Scorpio. But three out of the four put the Sun in Scorpio and probably the fourth (Jotik Rai's) does so, although details are not given. It is indeed stated in this that the Sun, Saturn and Mercury are all in one Sign, and we are told that the latter two are in Libra but perhaps all that is meant is, that the three are in the same House, viz., the Third.

↩

◌ Hailāj awwal juzū-i-ijtimā‘. Apparently this means that the first hyleg is the degree or place where the conjunction of the Sun and Moon took place before the birth. Perhaps hyleg is here to be taken to mean duration of life. The Lucknow ed. and MS. 564 contain more details in this compartment and also in the other squares of the figure.

They write “Hyleg; first, the degree of anterior conjunction; then the Part of Fortune; then the degree of the Ascendant's kadkhudā; with reference to the hyleg, Saturn is first, then Jupiter; and with reference to the Part of Fortune, Mercury, then Jupiter, then Saturn: and with reference to the degree of the Ascendant, first the Sun, then Mars, then Saturn.” In fact they insert here the words of the beginning of p. 38 of the text. Perhaps A. F. or Fatḥu-l-lāh was referring to the namūdār of Zoroaster. (See Prolegomena text 149 and trans. 204). The central entry in the diagram of our text appears inconsistent with the description at page 38 where Saturn is placed before Jupiter as regards the hyleg.

The horoscope diagrams in the Lucknow ed. and in some of the MSS. contain many abbreviations. The Lucknow ed. explains some of them, but the best account of the subject that I have seen is the tract entitled “Anonymus Persa de Siglis Arabum et Persarum astronomicis” which was found at Constantinople by J. Greaves (Gravius) the Oxford Professor and published in 1648, at the end of his Persian Grammar. The tract might well be republished for it is rare. Dr. Weber was unable to meet with it.

↩

◌ markaz. This ordinarily means centre. Marākaz-i-muḥaqqaq, true centres, is the name given to a method used by Albīrūnī for determining the limits of the twelve Houses. (See Ulugh Beg's Prolegomena 142, Sédillot 198.) But here the word means, I think, cusp, the boundary of a House. (See Dict. of T.Ts. I. 111. 1.4.) Markaz is derived, from rakz and, according to Lane means “a place where a spear or other thing is stuck in the ground upright.” Apparently the word cusp which comes from cuspis, the point of a spear, is a translation of the Arabic term. There is no Greek astrological term corresponding to it, so far as I know.

↩

Qā‘imu-l-autād ittifāq uftāda. The meaning is, apparently, that the four angles or cardinal points of the horoscope (viz., the First, Fourth, Seventh and Tenth Houses) are Fixed Signs, viz., Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius and Taurus.

↩

Apparently Jupiter and not the Sun, is lord of the triplicity (it is the fiery one) because the birth took place at night.

↩

This is the third darījān or drekkāna (decanate) of Leo. A Table in the Bengali astrological work Varāha Mihira (38) gives a list of all the drckkāna.

↩

This is the Sanscrit saptāmça. It is described in Bengali books on Astrology and is, apparently, an arrangement of the hours of the week. It is thus a form of the ahargaṇa.

↩

◌ wabāl. When a planet is in a Sign opposite to his House, he is said to be in his detriment. Thus Leo is the detriment of Saturn, because it is opposite to (six Houses, 180°, away from) his House, Aquarius. That wabāl corresponds to detriment appears, among other things, from the fact that the letter lām denotes the opposite aspect in astrology. This is because the Arabs use the last letter of a word as its abbreviation instead of its first as with us.

↩

◌ sahm, pl. ◌ sahām, properly means an arrow, sc. a divining-arrow, and hence, a lot or part. European astrologers portion out the Signs of the Zodiac into Parts. Haly and Guido Bonatus have much to say about the various partes and especially about the Pars Fortunae. (See Dict. of T.Ts. 698, s. v. Saham.)

↩

I borrow this word from Ashmand. It seems to correspond to khidmat.

↩

It is stated, later on, that most authorities put it in the 10th House.

↩

(See Jarret III. 20n.) Though originally from the West and hence called Maghribī, he eventually settled in Persia and assisted Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī. He belongs to the latter half of the 13th century.

↩

The Text is doubtful here.

↩

◌ aljaish. The Lucknow ed. reads ◌ ḥabs, ‘prison.’ So does MS. No. 564, and this is, perhaps, the correct reading, it being coupled with prisoners (alasārā). However, prisoners in the sense of captives or prisoners of war, may be meant and the reading in the text be right.

↩

There appears to be a mistake in the text, for this same degree is said to be both the term of Mars and the term of Saturn. This coincidence is, I believe, impossible. Probably the second statement is wrong for, according to Bengali books on astrology, 28° Pisces falls within the term of Mars. The confusion may perhaps be due to A.F.'s use of two classifications of terms. According to the old classification, quoted by Cardan, the last two degrees of Pisces belong to the term of Saturn.

↩

Aries is the exaltation of the Sun, but it does not occur in this Ninth House which begins at 28° Aries. The Sun's exaltation is 19° Aries (according to Bengali books, it is 10°) and his fall is 19° Libra.

↩

The last five degrees of Aries are the term of Saturn, according to one classification and according to another, they are the term of Venus.

↩

There is some doubt what planet these designations are to be assigned to, but it is certain that Aries is the fall of Saturn as being opposite to Libra—his House of exaltation—and that, for a similar reason, it is the detriment of Venus, as being opposite to her Mansion, viz., Libra.

↩

The text has ◌ abār. MS. 564 reads ◌ ābār and explains it as the plural of ◌ bi'r, ‘a well.’ Either reading is right; Lane (145) gives both forms ◌ and ◌ as plural of ◌. See Mafātīḥu-l-‘ulūm, 227, l.4, (Cf. the Hebrew Becrsheba, i.e., the well of the oath.) It is difficult to see the connection of wells with degrees, but Wilson (Astrological Dict.) says that certain degrees are called deep or pitted because they subject the Native to deep marks of small-pox or scars, or, according to others, cause an impediment in speech, troubles and disputes in which he is sunk as in a deep pit. Lilly (Christian Astrology 116, 2nd. ed. 1659), gives a table of the various degrees, viz., masculine and feminine, light, dark, smoky, void, deep or pitted, lame or deficient and says (118) that deep or pitted degrees “show the man at a stand in the question he asks, not knowing which way to turn himself and that he had need of help to bring him into a better condition for as a man cast in a ditch cannot easily get out without help so no more can this querent in the case he is without assistance.” In the Astronomia (Guido Bonatus, 59) there is a table of kinds of degrees; pitted degrees are there called gradus puteales.

↩

◌ ulām, ‘messengers’ and ‘messages.’ G. Bonatus mentions (646) that the Seventh Part of the Ninth House is that of Rumores.

↩

There is, apparently, some mistake here for just above, in the account of the Ninth House, we are told that the Part of male children is 23° 49' Taurus.

↩

Cancer is Jupiter's House of exaltation.

↩

Apparently there may be more than one hyleg or prorogator of life in a figure, and the meaning of the text seems to be that the first or chief hyleg is the point of anterior conjunction; that the Part of Fortune is the second hyleg; and that the Ascendant, lit., the degree of the Ascendant, is the third.

The meaning, however, may be that the hyleg is the first or most important thing in the horoscope. This agrees with the remark in the Tetrabiblos (Ashmand, 129.) “The inquiry into the duration of life takes precedence of all other questions as to the events subsequent to birth.” Obviously until it is known whether the Native will grow up to maturity, it is useless to inquire what his career will be in other respects.

↩

◌ juzū-i-ijtimā, “point of conjunction.” See the term explained in Dict. of T. Ts. 187 1.4, where the phrase is written ◌ and where there is a quotation from Mullā ‘Abdu-l-lāh Barjandī's Commentary on the Tables of Ulugh Beg. One of the hylegs in use was the last conjunction of the Sun and Moon (syzygy) before the birth, and another was the last antecedent opposition of the Sun and Moon. The full phrase in astrological books, as I find from a MS. in the B.A.S.'s Library called the Jawāmi‘ aḥkāmu-n-nujūm was ◌ juzū-i-ijtimā‘ yā istiqbāl muqaddam bar wilādat, ‘the point to conjunction for opposition antecedent to the birth.’ The point of conjunction was presumably, the hyleg in Akbar's case, because his birth took place on the 4th day of the month and consequently shortly after a conjunction, for the Muḥammadan months are lunar and begin with the new Moon, i.e., conjunction. The phrase awwal juzū-i-ijtimā‘ also occurs in the diagram (Figure III.) (36 l.9. fr. foot and 37 l.3.). Sédillot (202) translates the phrase juzū-i-ijtimā‘, (which occurs in Ulugh Beg's Prolegomena text 147 l.1.) by le degré de la conjonction, and the word ◌ mutaqaddam for which muqaddam is a variant, by antérieure à la nativité.

The point of anterior conjunction, we are told, is posited in the Second House of the horoscope, being 24° 50' Libra and, as both Jupiter and Venus are in this House, it is possible that the conjunction referred to is that of Jupiter and Venus, i.e., the two Fortunes, and not the conjunction of the Sun and Moon. According to the second or Indian horoscope, Jupiter and Venus were in conjunction in the Second House. (text 28 l.6.)

↩

The meaning seems to be that as regards the duration of life, Saturn is the kadkhudā ‘lord of geniture,’ as he is the planet with the largest orbit and his cycle is that of longevity, being a return to the Golden Age when men lived for centuries; (See Badāonī, Lowe 335.) but that as regards fortune and sovereignty, Jupiter is first; and as regards the Ascendant, the Sun is preëminent.

↩

◌ az mamarr. Mamarr has the technical meaning of transit, but apparently not here.

↩

See Jahāngīr's Memoirs, Price 45. Jahāngīr states that his father was tall, and remarkable for the length of his arms and the breadth of his chest.

↩

◌ muttaṣil. This word, which occurs again a few lines lower down, appears to have a technical meaning, signifying that the planet is within the power of the rays of another planet. See Dict. of T.Ts. 1508. s.v. ittiṣāl.

↩

The Sun is supposed to have special sway over the fourth climate to which Kashmīr, Kābul and Badakhshān belong. Saturn rules the first climate and India. India belongs mostly to the second and third climates, though A. F. says it is an aggregate of the first four climates. Jarrett III. 44.

The first four climates extend from lat. 12°42' to 39°N. In India A. F. includes Ceylon, the Moluccas, Malacca, etc. (Jarrett III. 7.) Bābar says India belongs to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd climates. (Erskine 312.) A.F. has no Indian places in his list of the countries of the fourth climate (Jarrett III. 76) though he makes it begin at 33°43' N. The first climate must be held to begin much further south than 12° N. if Ceylon, etc., are to be included.

↩

Apparently the meaning is that, as in this horoscope the position of the Sun is posterior to that of Saturn (the latter being in Libra and the former in Scorpio), the empire of India will be acquired before that of the fourth climate. It may, however, refer to the circumstance that according to the arrangement of heavens, Saturn has the first heaven and the Sun the fourth.

↩

The translation is doubtful; the literal rendering seems to be, “Signs having many risings” (of stars and planets?). The Ascendant is Leo; the Part of Fortune is in the Tenth House, viz: in 9° 22' Gemini and the degree of prior conjunction is in Libra. As according to Ptolemy and Muḥyī'u-d-dīn Maghribī, the Part of Fortune is 18° 9' Scorpio and so is in the Third House, A.F.'s meaning may possibly be that the three things referred to all occur in the early Houses of the horoscope.

↩

Venus is in 26° 23' 37" Virgo but as this part of Virgo falls into the First House of the horoscope, Venus is said to be in the Ascendant.

↩

Perhaps Saturn is meant; Libra is his House of exaltation. If so, the word ṭāli‘ must be taken not to mean ascendant but the whole of the horoscope. It may also be the Moon, as she is described as being paramount over the Second House.

↩

120 years was considered by astrologers and doctors the natural period of a man's life. See Ibn Khaldūn's Prolegomena, (Notices et Extraits.) XIX, 347. “Selon les médicins et les astrologues, la vie naturelle de l'homme est de cent vingt ans, de l'espèce que ceux-ci nomment grandes années humaines.” Similarly A. F. says, (Blochmann 121) “The elephant, like man, lives to an age of one hundred and twenty years.” A. F. seems actually to have hoped that Akbar would outlive 120 years and that he himself might have the honour of recording the events of that period. (Jarrett III. 416.) Kishwarkhudā, ‘world's lord,’ (Jarrett II, 258, l.3) seems to mean Akbar himself and not his dynasty. Varāha Mihira says (Brhat Jātaka I. ver. 63) that 120 years and 5 days is the maximum of the life of men and elephants. Badāonī tells us (Lowe 335) that the Jogīs promised Akbar he would live three or four times as long as ordinary men. No doubt they referred to the three kadkhudā(s) spoken of by A. F. (See also Albīrūnī on the length of human life. Chronicle of Ancient Nations, 90.) The three kadkhudā(s) might give a total of nearly a thousand years, according to Badāonī, one of the periods mentioned by the Jogīs, for it appears from the Libellus Isagogicus of Alchabitius, that the maximum of Saturn's years, (Fridaria) is 465, of Jupiter's 264, and of Mars', the same; 465+264+264= 993. 120 was the maximum of the Fridaria bestowed by the Sun. As a matter of fact, Akbar did not reach even the Scriptural three-score and ten,—dying on 13th October, 1605, (Elphinstone), in his climacteric (63 years,) just before the anniversary of his birth 15th October, 1542.

↩

Viz., that of Capricornus into which the Fifth House of the figure extends.

↩

Maurid-i-saṭwat-i-naiyir-i-a‘ẓam. The Third House begins at 28° 1' Libra, but the allusion is probably to the Sun's being in the first degree, 0° 45' 57" Scorpio; for the entry of a planet into a new Sign is a time of special power and auspiciousness. See Akbarnāma I, 55, l.2 fr. foot, in the account of Enoch.

↩

The Text and all authorities read ◌ ikhwān, ‘brothers,’ but the editors propose to read a‘wān, ‘allies or helpers,’ and no doubt this is the true reading. See Akbarnāma 26 ll.3 and 17 and ‘Abdu-l-ḥamīd's Bādshāhnāma 25 and 27.

‘Abdu-l-ḥamīḍ of Lāhor is said to have been a pupil of Abu-l-faẓl (See Rieu's Catalogue I. 260, quoting Ṣāliḥ), and certainly has done his best to imitate A. F.'s turgidities. He himself tells us that he was chosen by Shāh Jahān to be his Court historian on account of his being a proficient in the style of Abu-l-faẓl. It goes without saying that writing under Shāh Jahān, he is a much straiter Musulmān than his master. The lengthy account of Shāh Jahān's horoscope which he gives, was drawn up by Mullā ‘Alā'u-l-mulk of Tun in Khurāsān who afterwards got the title of Fāẓil Khān. (Badshāhnāma 13). Apparently the conjunction of planets which led to Shāh Jahān's receiving the title of Second Lord of conjunction (the first being Tīmūr) took place in 991 (1585), nine years before Shāh Jahān's birth. Great importance was attached to Shāh Jahān's having been born in the thousandth year of the Hijra. He was born under Libra the sign under which the Prophet was born.

↩

Naql means also ‘zest to wine,’ etc.

↩

See Shāh Jahān's horoscope for a similar expression. Bādshāhnāma 20 l.5.

↩

This does not seem quite accurate. In the previous account of the Houses, we are told that the Part of the other world is 17° 50' Scorpio and that of Fortune, according to Ptolemy and Muḥyī'u-d-dīn is 18° 9' Scorpio.

↩

We are told above that Mars is posited in 10° 48' 23" Capricorn which is his House of exaltation. The Fourth House begins at 27° 21' Scorpio which is Mars' mansion.

↩

Apparently the meaning is that Mars is in the Fifth House, in Capricorn, and so has the beneficent trine aspect to the First House, that is, the House of the Native's life.

↩

Auliyā-i-daulat. This seems an honorific circumlocution for the king himself, but may mean that Akbar was then a minor, and that conquests were made by his regent, Bairām Khān.

↩

This is a difficult passage, and I am uncertain of the meaning. Perhaps the text is corrupt, but all the MSS. I have examined give the same reading with the apparently unimportant difference that some omit the conjunction u between hashtum and cahārum. The difficulty lies in understanding how the constellation Gemini comes in here. Jauzā' means Orion as well as Gemini, but the latter seems intended here, for A.F., goes on to speak of its lord being occulted by the Sun and this can only refer to Mercury who is the lord of Gemini. It is possible that the meaning is that Gemini is the Eighth and Fourth House from the beginning of Scorpio, i.e., is Eight Houses apart on one side of the Third House, to which the first degrees of Scorpio belong, and Four Houses apart on the other. It is also possible that A.F. has confounded Jauzā', Orion, with Jauzā', Gemini. But I rather think that by Jauzā' may be meant the “lesser Twins,” viz., the stars ◌ and ◌ Scorpionis. See Sayce's “Higher Criticism and the Monuments,” p. 69n. where Professor Hommel is quoted as stating that there are three sets of Twins, viz., Castor and Pollux in Gemini, the lesser Twins in Scorpio and the lesser Twins in Aries. Mercury is in 25° 24' Libra of the horoscope, and so is occulted or immersed in the rays of the Sun which is posited in the first degrees of Scorpio. But I do not see why the first degrees of Scorpio are referred to by A.F., in his description of the Fourth House, for that begins near the end of Scorpio. Perhaps awwal is a mistake for ākhir. The Fourth House is that of the father and so may deal with his death. It is also that of lords and states.

↩

Humāyūn was killed by an accident when Akbar was little over thirteen. I suppose the meaning is that when Akbar was born his intellect, represented by Mercury, was subject to his father, but that when he came to the age of puberty, it emerged.

↩

This refers to the fact that Jalālābād was assigned by Humāyūn for Akbar's maintenance. See quotation from the Mirāt Āftābnāma of Shāh Nawāz Khān in Kanī Lāl Dās' paper J. A. S. B. for 1886, p. 83. See also, what is more to the point, Akbarnāma I, 315, where we are told that the servants and properties of his deceased uncle Hindāl, including Ghaznī, &c., were made over to Akbar when he was ten years old. Jalālābād used to be called Jūī Shāhī and was named after Akbar (Jalālu-d-din). See Akbarnāma I. 200 l.8 from foot.

↩

The Sixth House is that of servants.

↩

The Seventh is the House of marriage.

↩

Saturn rules India.

↩

In 969 (1562) i.e., when Akbar was in his twentieth year, he married Bihārī Mal's daughter. We do not hear of any other marriages in early youth with Indian ladies, but Badāonī (Lowe 211) tells us that Akbar said he had on coming of age, married many wives, both freeborn and slaves, and had not restricted himself to the legal number of four.

↩

The Second is the House of wealth.

↩

Perhaps this is the pars nobilitatis of Guido Bonatus and which appears to be 19° Aries i.e., the Sun's exalttion.

↩

The Eighth House is a House of misfortunes, death, etc.

↩

The Ninth is a House of travels.

↩

The Moon is in the Fifth House viz., 19° 48' 14" Capricorn and so she is in trine to the First and Tenth Houses.

↩

The Eleventh House is that of hopes.

↩

The Moon is in the Fifth House in 19° 48' 14" Capricorn and so is in detriment as being in the Sign opposite to her Mansion, viz., Cancer. The Twelfth is the House of private enemies and a House of misfortune. Had the Moon been in it, this would have been a bad omen. I do not understand how the Moon is said to be in faraḥ, i.e., joy; but apparently the author draws from this the inference that the enemies will be distressed and the Native will be gladdened. Possibly it refers to the Moon's being in the Fifth House and so in trine to the Ascendant. Perhaps the word is a mistake for ◌ farah, emptiness or disengagement.

↩

The Dragon's Tail is a cause of misfortune and increases evil influences. Apparently awwal ‘first,’ must be a mistake for ākhir, ‘last,’ for the Dragon's Tail is in the last degree of the Twelfth House viz., 27° 29' 13" Leo. (See supra.)

↩

◌ arbāb. Blochmann says (563n.) that this word, which is the plural of rabb, is used in Persian as a singular to mean a headman or magistrate . Perhaps then the expression arbāb-i-istifāẓa refers to Akbar himself. Otherwise, it refers to his ministers.

↩

The couplet is Faiẓī's and occurs with slight variation in the preface to his Līlāvatī. Calcutta 1828 p. 2.l.4.

↩

A town in Persia, west of the Caspian. It was the capital of the province of Āẕarbāijān. (See Meynard's Yāqūt, Paris, 1861, 21 and Jarrett III, 81). Maulānā Alyās would naturally follow the Īlkhānī Tables, for he belonged to the country of Tabrīz or Marāgha where Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī had his observatory.

↩

◌ bajins apparently means in genere or in gross, i.e., without details.

↩

◌ mustakhrij, lit. ‘extractor.’

↩

This passage is substantially repeated in the Āīn (III, 11; Jarrett III, 20.)

↩

This is the Heaven of the Fixed Stars. In the Āīn (III, 34; Jarrett III, 38) this is numbered as the Second Heaven,—the Eighth being that of Mercury. Here the author counts them in reverse order, beginning with the lowest, viz., that of the Moon,—and by thus counting upwards, the Heaven of the Fixed Stars becomes the Eighth. It will be remembered that the ancients attributed motion to the Fixed Stars, or at least to the sphere in which they were supposed to be placed. “The Ptolemaic astronomy attributes motion and a regular course to those stars which we now call Fixed but which the Greeks merely called ◌ undeviating.” (Ashmand 4n.)

↩

I do not know what school is referred to here. In the Āīn (II, 11 1.7 fr. foot) Ibn A' (A‘lam) (cir. 985 A.D.) and Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī (cir. 1272 A.D.) are mentioned as holding that the rate is one degree in sixty solar years. Perhaps the sixty-three are lunar but these are equal to more than 60 solar years,—for at the rate of eleven days a year, we get only 660 days or not quite two years.

According to Sédillot (Notes et Éclaircissements. Prolegomena. 289) Naṣīru-d-dīn as well as Ulugh Beg held seventy years to be the time. But he refers to his Matériaux (481) as showing that Arzachil knew of a movement as correct as that of our modern Tables. Arago, in his lectures, says that the movement is 50" 103 a year, and that the revolution is completed in 25, 867 years.

In the Astronomica quaedam ex traditione Shāh Cholgīl published by Greaves (Gravius) about the middle of the 17th century, we are told that according to observations made in the time of the Khalīf Al-Māmūn (813-34 A.D.) a degree was passed in 66 years and 8 months. Perhaps these were lunar, and if so, they would correspond nearly to the 63 (solar) mentioned in the Text. Muḥammad Shāh Quljī wrote a commentary on the Tables of Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī in 866 (1461). A. F. perhaps copied from him, for the passage in the beginning of the Āīn (Jarrett 6) about the explanation of the term zīj, etc., is very similar to one on Muḥammad Shāh Quljī, as given by Greaves and also it appears, by Sédillot. But Oriental writers copy so much from one another that it is difficult to know who was the original source. Shāh Quljī also gives seventy years as the rate of precession according to the Marāgha Tables; and says that the annual rate was 51" 26.'''

↩

The text reads ◌ time, but MS. 564 has ◌ which I have adopted.

↩

I suppose the meaning is that the motion being less than a minute a year, it could not become perceptible unless after a lifetime of observations or unless the observations were continued for generations.

↩

i.e., the Ninth or Crystalline Heaven.

↩

The Penny Cyclopaedia (Art. Astrology) says: “The astrologers never made any allowance for the precession of the equinoxes. Thus though the constellation Aries is now in Taurus and the influences of its stars ought to have moved with them, we find that the astronomical Aries or first 30° of the ecliptic, is used for the constellation. Under the circumstances, this is of little consequence, but such a practice would be fatal to astronomy.”

Ashmand (Preface and p. 32) defends astrologers against this charge and says, “We should rather say that the stars have changed places than that the parts of heaven in which they once were situated have done so.”

↩

The author does not mean that the Indian astronomers were ignorant of the movement of the stars, i.e., of the precession of the equinoxes. The account in the Āīn (Jarrett III. 19) shows that they held the movement to be 54" a year. But they thought that the (westward) movement only extended to 27° Aries and that then the stars retrograded to 27° Pisces and afterwards recommenced. In other words they held that the stars librated between 27° Aries and 27° Pisces.

↩

By the “new observations” those of Ulugh Beg are commonly meant, and it must be those which are referred to here, for A. F. is dealing with the horoscope of Maulānā Cānd which, we are told, was founded on the Gurgānī Tables, i.e., those of Ulugh Beg. According to Bābar (Erskine 51) the tables used by the Indian astronomers were those of Vikramāditya and he says that 1584 years had elapsed from the building of Vikramāditya's observatory. Apparently Bābar was writing this in 1527-28,=1584 Vikramāditya Era (which began B.C. 57.) But his statement in no way coincides with A. F.'s for Ulugh Beg's Tables were drawn up in 1434 and published in 1437 and if we deduct 1190 from 1434, we get 244 A.D. as the date of the Indian Tables.

(Sédillot gives the epoch of Ulugh Beg's Tables as 841 H.=1437 A.D.)

Nor can we reconcile the statements by supposing that the “new observations” mean those of Naṣīru-d-dīn Ṭūsī which were made at Marāgha in the latter part of the 13th century. According to the Āīn (Jarrett 4) Naṣīru-d-dīn's observatory was built 362 years and Ulugh Beg's 156 before A. F. wrote his book. Now the Āīn was composed in the 40th year of Akbar, i.e., 1596, so that 1234 would be the date of the Marāgha observations and 1434 those of Samarqand (Ulugh Beg's). The date 1234 is, however, certainly wrong, as it is nearly a quarter of a century before the destruction of Baghdād (1258) and we know that it was after this that Hulāgū Khān installed Naṣīru-d-dīn at Marāgha. According to D'Herbelot, Naṣīru-d-dīn was established at Marāgha in 657 (1259) and published his Tables in 668 (1270). Perhaps ◌ shaṣt, sixty, is a copyist's error for ◌ bīst, twenty which would yield the date 1274. A. F., however, with all his industry, is not to be trusted about dates as Silvestre de Sacy has shewn with reference to a statement in the Āyār-i-Dānish about the poet Rūdagī. Even if we deduct the 1190 years from 1272, the date of the Marāgha observations, we do not get back to Vikramāditya's era, though we get very near that of Sālivāhana, viz., 78 A.D.

The most probable explanation is that Bābar was mistaken in supposing that the Vikramāditya of the Tables was the Vikramāditya of the Era. The Indian Tables were probably composed in the time of the second Vikramāditya and in that of Varāha Mihira, though this date is also inconsistent with A. F.'s calculation.

↩

It would seem (Text III. 440 1.5 fr. foot) that the exact difference was a little more than 17°, for we are told that Bānū Ārām, Akbar's daughter, was born under 19° Sagittarius or 1° 54' according to Hindū calculation.

↩

The Lucknow ed. has “last volume,” and this is probably correct, the reference apparently being to the concluding volume of the Āīn, viz., III. 8. (Jarrett III. 13.)

↩

◌ fāris. It also means a lion and so there may be an allusion to the constellation Leo. Akbar is called (Āīn I. 139) shāhsuwār-i-‘arṣa-i-iqbāl, ‘the royal rider of the plain of fortune.’

↩

The author seems to refer to the fact of eminent astrologers, having been princes, e.g., Alexander, Alphonso of Castile and Ulugh Beg.

↩

The horoscope of Tīmūr is given in the Ẓafarnāma but without much detail. There is also one, as noticed by Gibbon, in Hyde's Syntagma (Dissert: II. 466) which was cast by Ashmole.

↩

◌ ‘alwīyāt. Perhaps this word has a technical meaning here, viz., the superior planets, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, which were so-called because their orbits were supposed to be higher than that of the Sun. See Mafātīḥu-l-‘ulūm, 229, top line. Mercury and Venus and the Moon are called kawākabu-s-siflīya, inferior planets.

↩

The meaning is, that the actual facts of Akbar's life exhibit all those wonderful qualities which astrologers have found by painful investigation of his horoscope.

↩

◌ pl. of ◌. The word seems properly to mean a midwife, but, as it comes after dāya and as no midwife is mentioned by name— unless Dāya Bhāwal be one,—I have rendered it cherisher. The word ◌ means both a midwife and a wet-nurse.

↩

Farr-i-wilādat. There is a play here on the two meanings of farr. Farr in Arabic means flight, and is here used in the sense of departure or passing, being contrasted with maqdam, advent or coming. The birth or vital principle of Akbar left Heaven and came upon Earth, thereby making Heaven envious and Earth leap for pride. But farr or far means in Persian, light or splendour, being etymologically the same word as the Greek ◌ and the English fire and so, farr-i-wilādat also means the light or splendour of the birth. Farr is often used by A. F. to mean the sacred light which belongs to a king. Thus at the beginning of the Āīn, he speaks of kingship as a light emanating from God, which light modern language calls the farr-i-īzadī or Divine light and which in ancient times was called the sublime halo. (Kīyān-khura.) (Blochmann iii.)

↩

The word in the Text is not honied but only sweet. However there is perhaps an allusion to the practice of putting honey into the mouths of the newly-born.

↩

Spelled here Qanauj. Shamsu-d-dīn helped Humāyūn up the steep bank of the Ganges, after he had swum across on an elephant when defeated by Shēr Shāh. (Blochmann 321.)

↩

According to Meninski (1698) Jījī, in Turkish, means a child's plaything. It also, in Turkish, means handsome.

↩

◌ ḥiẕānat, the technical word for the charge of a child. (Baillie's Mu. Law, 429.)

↩

The child to whom she afterwards gave birth was ‘Azīz Koka, the later Khān A‘ẓam. He was thus only slightly younger than Akbar who used to say that a channel of milk connected them together. (Ma‘āṯir I. 675). Jījī is said to have died in 1008 (1599). See l.c. 685 where she is called Bīca Jiū.

↩

Gulbadan (26) speaks of Fakhr-i-nisā Anaga as the mother of Nadīm Koka and wife of Mīrzā Qulī.

↩

There is an account of him in Text (I. 222) and he is mentioned in Bāyazīd Sulṭān's list of the officers who came to India with Humāyūn. A. F. calls him Khwāja Ghāzī Tabrīzī and says that he was distinguished for his knowledge of accounts and made a dīwān by Humāyūn, and was subsequently, for a long time, excluded from Court and only returned at the end of his life to the Court of Akbar and when his intellect was enfeebled by age. Bāyazīd calls him Khwāja Ghāzī Shīrāzī and says Humāyūn made him a dīwān when he was in the Takht-i-sulaimān country. The fact of his long exclusion from Court and of his not being entered in the Grandees of the Āīn or of the Ṭabaqāt, might explain, supposing him Māham Anaga's husband, (see note at end of chapter) why no mention is made of him in that relation.

↩

Mentioned in Bāyazīd's Catalogue as Toq Begī Sāqī, i.e., page or cupbearer.

↩

Apparently a Hindūstānī and possibly a Hindū.

↩

Sa‘ādat Yār Koka is mentioned three times in the Akbarnāma, in the third volume, viz.: (192) where he is one of those sent on pilgrimage to Mecca; (579) where we are told, his brother's daughter was given in marriage by the Emperor to A. F.'s son ‘Abdu-r-raḥmān (see Blochmann, Life of A. F. XXXV.) and lastly (656) where we are told of Sa‘ādat Yār's death in the 39th year (Āẕar 1003, November 1595), from excessive drinking and of the Emperor's sorrow for this and of his paying a visit of consolation to the house of his sister, Ḥājī Koka.

↩

Called by the Ma'āṯir and Blochmann, Pīcah Jān Anaga. She was the wife of Khwāja Maqṣūd of Herāt.

↩

Mashārib, dispositions, but also beverages, and ṭabaqāt, dishes or trays as well as stages or degrees, so that apparently one of the intended meanings is “divers beverages in divers vessels,” signifying the varied nature of the nurses' milk.

↩

The text has wuḥūd, unity, but I presume this is a mistake for wujūd, which occurs in No. 564.

↩

This seems rather ungracious, especially after such complimentary expressions about them.

↩

This is a trait mentioned of Zoroaster. (See Dabistān trans: I. 218). Only he is said to have laughed aloud when he was born. Anquetil du Perron (Life of Zoroaster 13n.) quotes Pliny who, in his Natural History, says, “Risisse eodem die quo genitus esset, unum hominem accepimus Zoroastrum.” The account of Solomon in the Apocrypha is more touching. “When I was born, I drew in the common air and fell upon the earth which is of like nature, and the first voice which I uttered, was crying, as all others do.”

↩

The Lucknow ed. says that this means the Nine Heavens. Ṣadaf means the oyster-shell and also the vault of heaven. It is also a name given apparently to the two constellations of Ursa Major and Minor. See Burhān-i-qāti‘.

↩

◌ Shākh, also called zabād, whence civet. (Blochmann 79.)

↩

‘ākifān-i-ṣawāmi‘. This phrase occurs in one of Faiẓī's odes (Āīn I. 240) and is translated by Blochmann (559) “those who constantly worship in cloisters.” The next expression sākinān-i-majāmi‘-i-ins may mean “dwellers in mosques” as the note to this passage in No. 564 seems to hold, but I am inclined to think that here it means laymen or those who carry on the affairs of the world, in opposition to the solitaries and ascetic. What A. F. intends to say is, I think, that by Akbar's birth, everybody attained their desires, that is both the lonely ascetic and the worldling, and thus the whole universe was benefited. It may however be that the two classes of holy men are, intended viz., anchorites and men who live in monasteries or congregations of saints. I admit too, that this interpretation seems to agree better with what follows, viz., the description of such persons “preserving the stars from wrong.” But see Text (87) where we are told that the preparations for the revelation of the unique Pearl (Akbar) were completed, as now the stages of solitude and society had been traversed.

↩

Jigargosha lit: liver-lobe.

↩

Sharaf, an astrological term signifying the exaltation of a planet or star. This first couplet is adapted from Faiẓī. (Akbarnāma III, 678.)

↩

◌ “Talmīḥ” says Gladwin (Dissertations on Persian Rhetoric 53.) “literally signifies using something savoury and is employed when the author alludes to some popular story or verse, e.g., ‘O light of my eyes! when the garden of my condition is deprived of the rose of thy countenance, my state becomes like Jacob in the house of mourning.’”

↩

◌ tashrīḥ. This is from sharḥ and seems primarily to mean dissection. (Dict: of T. Ts. 735.)

↩

The heading of this chapter is omitted in the text and the account of Akbar's visit to his father is made part of Chapter IX. But the heading is given in No. 564 and other MSS. and is clearly required. The Persian is as follows; ◌

In the Lucknow ed. ◌ bamūjib is, apparently by mistake, substituted for ◌ bamaukib.

↩

According to Niẓāmu-d-dīn, the meeting-place was in pargana Jūn. A. F. also states that it was in Jūn. (I. 184.)

↩

◌, a phrase applied to the conjunction of the two Fortunes, Jupiter and Venus. It is the title of a famous poem by Amīr Khusrau on the meeting of Kaiqūbād and his father Naṣīru-d-dīn. (Stewart's Bengal 78).

↩

◌ surādiq-i-‘izzat. Dozy says (647b) “Dais (au-dessus d'un trône.) Ce qu'on nomme en persan ◌ (dont ◌ est peutêtre une altération) ou ◌ c. à. d. l'énorme enceinte de toile que dans les pays musalmans, entoure la vaste tente du souverain.”

↩

Apparently he had previously left his sister and joined Humāyūn's camp.

↩

20th November, 1542 O. S., According to Jauhar (trans. 45) the day was 10th Ramaẓān.

↩

Takht-i-rawān. See Ives' voyage to India (278) for a representation of this conveyance. It is usually carried on mules.

↩

Meaning the takht-i-rawān (travelling-litter.)

↩

Lit.: eyes of the Sulṭānat. There is a play on the original meaning. The eyes were to be turned towards the qibla, etc.

↩

◌ daṃbāl. From Āīn IV. 438 (Jarrett IV. 393) we learn that Akbar objected to the use of the word daṃbāl in poetry as being prosaic. It literally means tail.

↩

Meaning that there was a second assemblage, viz., one in addition to that upon earth.

↩

Jupiter and Venus; but perhaps this is only a rhetorical way of describing the meeting between Akbar and his father or his arrival in his mother's company. The time being the end of the month would be that of the conjunction of the Sun and Moon.

↩

◌ farqad, a bright star near the Pole. The word is often written ◌ and applied to two bright stars, ◌ and ◌, in the Little Bear. (Lane 2387a.)

↩

These lines are Faiẓī's.

↩

The allusion probably is to the threshold of the Caliph's palace at Baghdād which contained a piece of the famous black stone of Mecca. See Richardson's Dict. s. v. dar and D'Herbélot art. Bāb.

↩

For an account of him, see Blochmann No. 55, (541) and Badāonī III. 157 and especially 197. He ended his days as guardian of Humāyūn's tomb.

↩

These words make 949 as follows.

sh=300sh=300
h= 5h= 5
n= 50j= 3
h= 5
ā= 1
n= 50
g= 20
ī= 10
r=200
Total949
↩

Akbar, comparative of Kabīr.

↩

◌ shab-yak-shaṃbih, panj rajab. The text has an ū and the editors remark that this makes the number of years six too much, viz.: 955, but that if the ū be excluded as in one of their MSS. the letters give the correct date, 949. I find that the Lucknow ed. and No. 564 omit the ū. The letters give 949 thus:—

sh=300sh = 300
b= 2n = 50
ī= 10b = 2
k= 20h = 5
p= 2r=200
n= 50j= 3
j= 3b= 2
Total949

According to Mu. calculation Akbar was born on Sunday night, for they count the night first and then the day, beginning at sunset, but according to ordinary parlance, he was born on Saturday night, i.e., early on Sunday morning.

↩

Abū'l-faẓl was born 14th Jan., 1551, so that he was 8 years and 3 months younger than Akbar.

↩

The author is referring, in part, to the supposed fact that the true horoscope of Akbar was not known until 1583.

↩

Khaqānī is a famous Persian poet who died at Tabrīz in 580 (1185), according to one account and in 595 (1199) according to another. The lines quoted by A. F. are to be found in Khaqānī's Quatrains, (St. Petersburg ed. 1875) p. 26, Rubā‘ī 145 and p. 18, Rubā‘ī 101. See also J. A. S. B. New Series xxxvi. Oct., 1841, 156. For account of Khaqānī, see M. Khanykov's Mémoir, Journal Asiatique, Sixth Series, 1864, iv, 137 et seq. and 1865, v, 298.

↩

I adopt the reading of the St. Petersburg MS. and No. 564, of ◌ mā instead of the ◌ yā of the Text.

↩

See text, p. 51, 1.5 fr. foot, for the word har-yak-chandī.

↩

The allusion is to Khaqānī's quatrain. A. F. means that having, like Raphael in Hypatia, found the true man, he neither sighs for a past appearance nor longs for a future advent. Cf. Wordsworth's “The past unsighed for and the future sure.”

↩

See Text III. 83ff. A. F. was introduced to Akbar in the 19th year, 981 (1574).

↩

Gharfat, paradise. It means first an upper chamber and hence is used to denote the Seventh Heaven or highest place in Paradise. (Lane 2249c.) A. F. means that, by acquiring Akbar's intimacy, he has risen higher than if he had had high office and distinguished outward rank. Blochmann remarks (xxviii) that A. F. “never accepted a title.” But this is rather a question-begging phrase. He is No. 71 in the list of Manṣabdārs, being a Commander of Four Thousand and he had the title of ‘Allāmī. Bāyazīd calls him Nawāb.

↩

◌ ābāī ‘alwī, sublime fathers, i.e., the seven planets.

↩

The original gives the list in an ascending order, beginning with Akbar. I have taken the names of the patriarchs from the revised version of the Old Testament.

↩

Major Raverty (Ṭabaqāt-i-nāṣirī, 873n) prefers Alminja. Sir H. Howorth has Iltchi. Apparently Alinja is the grandson and not the son of Turk, his father's name having been Tutak. Probably “Alinja” is wrong for we find this name a little lower in the list. Col. Miles (Genealogical Tree of the Turks) has Obluchi.

↩

Major Raverty (880) says that Kun means the Sun, Āi the Moon, and Yaldūz a star, and that the three were brothers. A. F. in his account of Oghuz Khān makes them brothers and also mentions Tingīz (i.e., the sea) as one. (Text, 60 l.2 fr. foot.)

↩

It appears from D'Herbélot that this is the Turkish form of Michael, hence its frequent recurrence.

↩

Qāān, Khākān, i.e., Great Khān.

↩

Variously written in the text. In one place it is Dumanīn. Howorth has, after Erdmann, Dutūm Menen. (I. 39.)

↩

Here, for some time, the list ceases to record the names of kings. Qācūlī is also spelled Qājūlī. He was twin-brother of Qabal Khān, the ancestor of Cingīz Khān. In accordance with his father, Tumana's interpretation of his dream, he became Commander-in-Chief. (See his biography infra.)

↩

Spelled also Sūghu-jijan. It means wise, according to Raverty (898).

↩

Spelled also Nu-yīn. The word is explained as meaning, in Mongolian, king's son or prince and also a chief or general. See Jarrett III. 344n. where it is transliterated Novian. See also Farhang-i-Rashīdī II. 277. Quatremère (Rashīdu-d-dīn, Trans. 76.) says, “Le mot noian ◌ ou noin qui appartient à la langue mongole, désignait le chef d'un toman, c'est à dire d'un corps de dix mille hommes.”

↩

Blochmann (Genealogical Table) calls him Jalālu-d-dīn Mīrān Shāh and A. F. does so too. (Text 81.)

↩

Gulbadan mentions that Bābar took the title of Pādshāh after the birth of Humāyūn. Pādshāh was changed to Bādshāh in India because, says Blochmann, Pād means crepitus ventris.

↩

In the preface of the Persian translation of the Mahābhārat, (B.M. No. 5638, p.8.) A. F. calls him Abū'l-fatḥ and this is the name given in the document drawn up by A.F.'s father, Mubārak, and others and preserved by Badāonī. (Blochmann 185 and Lowe 279.) There too he is styled Ghāzī. A.F. also uses the title Abū-l-fatḥ in the introductory verses of the Tafsīr-i-Akbarī or Great Commentary which he presented to Akbar on his second introduction to him in 982 (1574). (The abjad value of the words Tafsīr-i-Akbarī is 983, but the introduction took place in 982 H. See Inshā, III.) The full name of the Emperor as there given is Abū'l-fatḥ Jalālu-d-dīn Muḥammad Akbar Shāh Al-Ghāzī, and it would seem that the Commentary which A.F. then presented was on the opening of the Ṣūratu-l-fatḥ, in allusion to Akbar's name and also to his recent victories in Bengal. On the other hand, Faiẓī (Nal ū Daman Calcutta ed. 1831. 24.) calls Akbar, Abū'l-muẓaffar Jamālu-d-daula ū Jalālu-d-dīn Muḥammad Akbar. Perhaps Muẓaffar was the original name and was changed to Fatḥ, after the victories in Bengal and to assimilate it to the name of Akbar's favourite residence, Fatḥpūr Sīkrī. The words Muẓaffar and Fatḥ are nearly synonymous, one meaning a victory or victorious, and the other victory.

This seems a fitting place, for noting that the first letter of the word Akbar is short and the Emperor's name should not be pronounced Ākbar but Ăkbar. Hence the word used to be written in English Ukbar or Ukber. The word Akbarnāma has a double meaning; it may signify the History of Akbar and also the Great or Supreme Book. It is perhaps rather significant that both A.F. and his brother should omit the title of Ghāzī which was given to the young Akbar after the defeat of Hēmū.

↩

Or, pages issuing from.

↩

That is counting Akbar as No. I. According to the series given by the author, Yaldūz (it is Yaldūz, No. 2, and the No. 29 of the English list), is the 24th. jadd or ancestor of Akbar. Either on this account or because he found four in his MS. Chalmers has 24th ancestor.

↩

Apparently this should be Qīyān Khān for he is described as the son and not merely as the descendant of Īl Khān. For a similar reason, it should be Tīmūr Tāsh and not Mangalī Khwāja.

↩

It will be pointed out hereafter that A.F. has greatly overstated the time during which the Mughals were in Irgānaqūn. Other historians give the time as between 400 and 500 years.

↩

Chalmers makes this 25, and this is correct, unless one exclude Īl Khān himself.

↩

Lit. observe the spring and autumn of the four-fold garden (i.e., the world) and know the gamut of the seven assemblages from the highest the lowest notes—anjuman, which I presumes here means climes and not the planets.

↩

Colebrooke says (As. Res. IX. 291.) “In Hindustan, the Jains are usually called Syauras but distinguish themselves into Srāvacas and Yatis.” The name does not seem to be in use now. I do not know its origin unless it be a corruption of Çvētāmbara. (See Jarrett IV, 210n.)

The name Syaura was evidently in common use in Sūrat in the middle of the last century for Anquetil du Perron refers to it and says, (Discours Préliminaire, 365), that the two leading classes of Hindūs at Sūrat are the Brāhmans and the Sciouras. He calls these, Hindū priests, and says that they also go by the name of Djettis (Yatis). They seldom marry, he says, dress in white and have the head uncovered and wear their hair short, “like the Abbés in France.” They carry a “ballett” (brush) to clean the places where they sit down, lest they should crush an insect. In a note, he says that the Sciouras call the first man Rikaba Deva and his mother, Maru Devi, and that they say these beings were created by God in Aiodha, i.e., the north of Delhi (Oudh?). Probably, however, Aiodha is a misprint for Agroha or Agaroa. (See Tieffenthaler I. 135, where Saraug is probably a mistake for Scioura). Perhaps this is why they compared (See Text) the hair of yugala infants with that of Delhi children.

↩

Sanskrit ◌ āra, a spoke in time's wheel.

↩

So also As. Res. IX. 258. Major Mackenzie's account of the Jains.

↩

As to these numbers, see Jarrett III. 111 and Faizī's Līlavatī, Cal. 1828, 7 and 8. The statement in the text may be put into tabular form as follows:—

100,000=lak.
1,000,000=prayūt.
10,000,000=krōr.
100,000,000=arb.
1,000,000,000=kharb.
10,000,000,000=nikharb.
100,000,000,000=mahāsarūj. or padm.
1,000,000,000,000=sankha.
10,000,000,000,000,=samudr or kōrākōr.

In Text it is stated that 100 krōrs, i.e., 1000 millions=an arb but this is probably a mistake for 10 krōrs. (See the scale in Āīn, Jarrett III, 111.) Cf. ◌— Mahāsarūj Great Lake-born, i.e., the lotus, Monier Williams (Dictionary 761a), says it is equal to mahāmbuja, i.e., a billion.

↩

A.F. is apparently referring to the Mu. tradition that Eve produced twins at every birth, viz., a boy and a girl. He may also be referring to the views of the Gerbanites as given by Abraham Ecchellensis (Principles of Geology, Lyell, Chap. II). In that case, the words son and daughter should be translated male and female.

↩

(Jarrett IV. 196 and 200.) Sansc. yugala, a pair. I do not know why the number 4096 has been selected; 4696 is given in the Āīn as the period that had elapsed from the reign of Yudhiṣṭhira to 40th Akbar (Jarrett II. 15) and also as that from the Deluge to the time of writing the Āīn, i.e., 40th Akbar (1596 A.D.). Perhaps 4096 is a mistake for 4696.

The passage (about the hair) occurs also at Āīn II. 104 (Jarrett III. 200) but there seems an error in the Āīn (Text) inasmuch as it represents the hair of a yugala child as 4096 times thicker than that of a Delhi child. The point, however, clearly is that the chopped hair (See Text infra) used for filling the cavity, be excessively fine, to wit, that of a yugala child, which is 4096 times finer than that of a Delhi child and that of a seven days' yugala child being still finer. Colebrooke (As. Res. 1. c. 313) quotes Hēmacandra's Vocabulary, and says, “I do not find that he anywhere explains the space of time denominated sāgara or ocean. But I understand it to be an extravagant estimate of the time which would elapse before a vast cavity, filled with chopped hairs, could be emptied at the rate of one piece of hair in a century; the time required to empty such a cavity measured by yojanas every way is a palya and this repeated ten cotis of cotis times is a sāgara 1,000,000,000,000,000 palyas=one sāgara or sāgaropama.”

↩

Four kōs, but the Indian word is yōjana.

↩

The Āīn has 100 years, and this seems the correct reading here for B.M. MSS. Nos. 5610 and 1709 have har ṣad sāl, every hundred years. In the text is ṣad hazār, a hundred thousand.

↩

This is, apparently, differently stated in the Āīn (Jarrett III, 192), but perhaps the meaning of the Āīn (Text) is only that 24 demiurges appear in each āra and live for three or four āras.

↩

The text has Mahādēō, but this is clearly a clerical error. (See Āīn II. 99, 1.4), where the spelling is given. The error is apparently repeated at II. 106, 1.3 fr. foot.

↩

Anquetil du Perron remarks (Tieffenthaler II. XXI), that the fourth Age has served to form the first three by adding successively 432,000.

↩

Tajarrud-nihād ū danish-nizhād.

↩

The word day is used here in two senses, first as the nycthemeron or day of 24 hours and then in its ordinary sense, as opposed to night. There seems to be an error in the Text ◌ hazār ū, “a thousand and” being a mistake for ◌ hazārwī, a thousandfold. The meaning is “equal to a thousand of four Ages, i.e., Mahāyug(s).” The “1,000 Mahāyug(s)” is apparently a statement in round numbers, the more exact figures being 980, for each Manu existed for 70 kalpas (71 according to another account) or Mahāyug(s) and as there are 14 successive Manus in a day of Brahmā, the length of it is 70×14=980. Firishta has copied A.F. (he acknowledges this, stating that he is epitomizing A.F.'s translation of the Mahābhārat), but he has gone to A.F.'s preface rather than to the Akbarnāma. See his Introduction (Elliot-Dowson's trans. VI. 532 E. n. E.) A.F.'s preface to the Persian translation of the Mahābhārat is to be found in the B.M. Add. No. 5638. It was written in the 32nd Akbar and contains an account of the four Ages corresponding to that in the Text. (See 1. c. 12a).

I find in the Çāntiparvan— (Twelfth Book of the Mahābhārat)— (II, 237, Pratab Chandra Rai's tran.) that the four Yugs (Ages) contain 12,000 years of the gods, i.e., 432,000 ÷360; and that this period is called a Dēvayug. “A thousand such Yugas (i.e., Dēvayugas or Mahāyugas) compose a single day of Brahmā. The same is the duration of Brahmā's night.”

↩

The word day is used here in two senses, first as the nycthemeron or day of 24 hours and then in its ordinary sense, as opposed to night. There seems to be an error in the Text ◌ hazār ū, “a thousand and” being a mistake for ◌ hazārwī, a thousandfold. The meaning is “equal to a thousand of four Ages, i.e., Mahāyug(s).” The “1,000 Mahāyug(s)” is apparently a statement in round numbers, the more exact figures being 980, for each Manu existed for 70 kalpas (71 according to another account) or Mahāyug(s) and as there are 14 successive Manus in a day of Brahmā, the length of it is 70×14=980. Firishta has copied A.F. (he acknowledges this, stating that he is epitomizing A.F.'s translation of the Mahābhārat), but he has gone to A.F.'s preface rather than to the Akbarnāma. See his Introduction (Elliot-Dowson's trans. VI. 532 E. n. E.) A.F.'s preface to the Persian translation of the Mahābhārat is to be found in the B.M. Add. No. 5638. It was written in the 32nd Akbar and contains an account of the four Ages corresponding to that in the Text. (See 1. c. 12a).

I find in the Çāntiparvan— (Twelfth Book of the Mahābhārat)— (II, 237, Pratab Chandra Rai's tran.) that the four Yugs (Ages) contain 12,000 years of the gods, i.e., 432,000 ÷ 360; and that this period is called a Dēvayug. “A thousand such Yugas (i.e., Dēvayugas or Mahāyugas) compose a single day of Brahmā. The same is the duration of Brahmā's night.”

↩

◌ ṯiqāt, “trusty friends or confidants.” For use of this word, see Text 121 1.12, A.F. probably means here Manu or the Manus. Firishta has copied the expression and Professor Dowson (Elliot VI. 563) translates, “I have heard from my Brāhman friends, etc.”

↩

It would seem from the Āīn (Jarrett II, 15) that the half day has not fully expired, for we are told that 14 Manus appear in each of Brahmā's days. When A.F. was writing, 50 years had elapsed, and consequently 360 × 14=5,040 Manus had appeared. But instead of 7 Manus of the first day of the 51st year's having appeared, i.e., the number that appear in half a day, we are told that only 6 Manus had appeared and departed, and that only a portion of the time of the 7th, viz., 27 kalpas, 3 yugas and 4,700 years of the 4th Yug had elapsed. If this be correct, the 7th Manu had then more than half his time to run, viz., 43 kalpas out of his 70.

↩

See Jarrett III, 210 where A.F. speaks of having got his information about the Jains from learned men of the Çvētāmbara order, and says that he could not get exact information about the tenets of the Digambaras (sky-clad.)

↩

Apparently the writer referred to is Muḥyī'u-d-dīn Ibnu-l-‘Arabī, author of the Fuṣūṣu-l-ḥikam (Hājī Khalfa IV. 424). See Rieu's Cat. II. 831b, item III. and 832b, Item XVII. and Ar. Cat. No. 233. He was also the author of the Futūḥāt-i-makkīyah (see Rieu II, 874b) and of a number of definitions appended to Jorjānī in Flügel's ed. The latter gives the name as “Mohjied-dīn Mohammed b. Ali Hatimi Tajī vulgo Ibn Arabi dictus,” and says he died in 638-1240. A.F. refers to Muḥyī'ū-d-dīn in the Āīn (II. 221 and Jarrett III. 373.) See also Badāonī, Lowe, 265.

↩

Apparently Sa‘du-d-dīn Mu. B. al-Mu'ayyad Ḥamūī who died 650 H. (Rieu 755a and 1095a.) He is referred to in the Āīn (Jarrett III. 390), and there is a short notice of him in Prince Dārā Shikōh's Sajīnatu-l-auliyā' where it is stated that he died in Khurāsān 650 H. (1252 A.D.)

↩

◌ rabbānī. Lane defines this as meaning one who devotes himself to religious services or exercises, or applies himself to excess of devotion. He does not give the meaning of “a period of time,” but states that rabbī, the sing. of rubūb, means thousand, and that some say it means 10,000. Richardson gives ribbī as meaning thousands, a myriad. In the second Epistle of St. Peter ii. 8, we have the expression (as pointed out, I believe by Sale) “One day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.” See also Psalm xc. 4. In the preface to the Mahābhārat, A.F. refers to the views of Ibn ‘Arabī and Imām Ja‘far Ṣādiq.

↩

See Rieu II. 435a for an account of this work. It is an encyclopædia written by Mu. B. Maḥmūdu-l-āmulī. I have not in B. M. MS. No. 16827, been able to find the passage referred to by A. F., but the volume is thick and has no index. See Jarrett II. 19, where we aret old that 8,884 wans 60 years, have elapsed up to the date, of the Āīn. These figures seem inconsistent with those of the Text, and apparently both are wrong. D'Herbélot (art. Van.) states that the Mughals reckon that 874 H. corresponds to the 8863rd. van of 10,000 years each, and then adds that 874 H. corresponds to 1443 A.D. In the end, the figures will come out nearly as A.F.'s if we substitute a six for an eight in the Āīn figures, making them 8864 and insert an eight in our text so as to read 8863 instead of 863.

Here we are told that 863 wans, 9,800 years, had elapsed from the time of Adam to 735 H.=1334 A.D. Consequently, 1003 H., 1594 A.D. the 40th Akbar and the date of the Āīn would correspond with 864 wans, 60 years, for 1594—1334=260 years.

874 H. is 88,639,860 years from the Creation. 847 H.=1443 A.D., so that this calculation agrees pretty nearly with that quoted by A.F. for 1334 A.D., viz., 8863 wans 9800 years, the difference being 109-60=49 years. Sédillot refers to a passage of D'Herbélot which, he says, is derived from Greaves. Sédillot considers that the true figures are 8863 wans, 9860 years; or 9820 according to one MS. This last figure agrees best with A.F., for in the Āīn (Jarrett II. 19) he says that according to the Khaṭāī Era, 8884 wans 60 years have elapsed up to the date of his writing, i.e., 40th Akbar=1596 A.D. 1596-1443 =158, and this does not differ materially from 9864 wans 60 years —8863 wans 9820 years = 140.

↩

The Text has har before wan which seems a mistake.

↩

There is probably some mistake here. The cycle of the planets was generally reckoned as much longer than 7,000 years. See amongst other places, Principles of Geology, Lyell, Cap. II. Quotation from Abraham Ecchellensis. Perhaps A. F. means that each Rabbānī day is 7,000 years long and that thus a Rabbānī week is 49,000 years. If so, the trs. should be “After a week of Rabbānī days.”

↩

Perhaps “not being satisfied with big books.” The Persian is iktifa' for use of which see Text 10, 1.2 fr. foot. A.F. may mean that certain voluminous histories do not give the facts properly.

↩

A.F. tells us later that these 52 persons do not fill the gap between Adam and Akbar. There is no record of some 25 generations.

↩

The Era of Adam is described in the Āīn. (Jarrett II, 2.) All the periods given there are under 7,000 years. The “7,000 years” of A.F.'s authorities are probably lunar and about 211 have to be deducted to convert them into solar. Many dates of the Creation, etc., are given in the Ḥabību-s-siyar.

↩

Capricorn is Saturn's nocturnal mansion; Pisces the nocturnal mansion of Jupiter, and Aries the diurnal house of Mars. There does not seem to be any special connection between the Moon and Leo but perhaps she is there as Vizier or deputy for the Sun, who is in Virgo, —the nocturnal house of Mercury,— but whose mansion is Leo. Libra is the diurnal house of Venus.

↩

Ittiṣāl. This is the technical meaning of the term but A.F. may only intend that Mercury was near some other planet.

↩

The Muḥammadan tradition is that Eve, at every parturition produced twins except at Seth's birth. He was born alone,— hence the numbers 21 males and 20 females. See account of Seth, infra.

↩

The Text and No. 564 have ◌ ta‘fīnāt. Ordinarily this seems to mean evil smells or putridities, but Steingass gives also the meaning tincture—“(◌ ta‘fīn v. n. 2 of ◌ tincture).” If this be taken in the sense of elixirs or efficacious drugs, it may be that ta‘fīnāt is right and it agrees with the statement in the Ḥabību-s-siyar that Adam's book dealt, among other subjects, with the properties of medicines. Yet A.F. would hardly class medicine among the occult sciences. In the sense of tincture, possibly ta‘fīnāt has reference here to the tradition mentioned in the Prolegomena to the Ẓafarnāma, that when Adam was cast out of Paradise, he fell upon the mountains of Ceylon, and spent 100 years there in prayer and penitence. During this time, he wept so much that plants grew up out of the pools of his tears, and all of these were medicinal or aromatic like cloves, cinnamon, etc.

In B.M. No. MCCCVI, (p. 19) (Rieu, Ar. Cat. 601,602) which is the Ar. Text of Shahrazūrī's Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā, the word is not ta‘fīnāt but apparently, alba‘qīnāt, which does not seem to have any meaning. The passage is ◌ ba‘ẓī kutub fi-l-ba‘qīnāt. Perhaps the word should be ◌ alyaqīnīyāt, “certainties” such as articles of religion. In I.O. No. 1579, (Per. trs. of Shahrazūrī by one Maqṣūd ‘Alī of Tabrīz) we find (16a) that unfortunately the alba‘qīnāt or alyaqīnīyāt of Shahrazūrī's Text is represented by a word without diacritical marks. The passage is ū dīdam man ba‘ẓī az kutubhā-ī-ōrā dar ◌ ẓāhir imām. Taking the illegible word to be ta‘ṣībat fr. ta‘ṣīb, the appointing a man as chief and which with ẓāhir, may mean the external marks or indications of such a person, this may be rendered, “And I saw various books about the marks (or notes) of an Imām” (? anām, mankind.) Some countenance is given to this view by finding that Seth, a son of Adam, laid down 16 rules or marks of a true believer (mu'min) as if the father had laid down those of an Imām (apostle) and the son, those of a disciple.

Another suggestion which has occurred to me is that the word is ◌ al-bayyināt, demonstrations,” and which has also the technical sense of “cabalistic interpretations of the meanings of letters.” This word occurs in Ḥājī Khalfa's account of the Sifr-i-ādam (Book of Adam) (Fluegel's ed. III. 599,600.) Here we are told that Adam's book was written on 21 olive leaves of Paradise and its gates (?) and dealt with the properties of letters, etc.

One more suggestion remains, viz., that A.F.'s word is taflīnāt, i.e., Heb. tephillim, “amulets or phylacteries.” The variants in the notes to our Text do not seem of value, and MSS. which I have consulted, throw no light on the point. Evidently the word is used in an unusual sense and the copyists have been unable to understand it.

The n of ta‘fīnāt does not, I think, occur in the MSS. I have consulted. In the beautiful MS. of Halhed (No. 5610, 31 l.3 fr. foot) the word appears to be ◌ ta‘fiyāt, “obliterations, amendments.” In R.A.S. No. 116 it is clearly written ◌ ta‘qliyāt, and this might yield a good sense for ta‘qliyāt (fr. ‘aql) seems to mean abstruse points in philosophy. (Lane 2114 a and b.) R.A.S. No. 117 has ◌ ta‘fiyāt.

↩

This is the Imām Shāmsu-d-dīn Muḥammad Shahrazūrī referred to by Āmir Khwānd (Khondamīr) in his Khalāṣatu-l-akhbār. (Persian Munshī, Gladwin, 1801, Part II. 265,266.) The Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā (Rehatsek II. Part I.) states that he was the author both of the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā and the Nazhatu-l-qulūb (Hearts' Delight), but if so, the latter is apparently not the work described by Rieu (I. 418a.) Shamsu-d-dīn is also mentioned in B.M. Ar. Cat. 209, 601, 602. The book there described is anonymous and entitled Nazhatu-l-arwāḥ ū Rauẓat-l-afrāḥ, “Delights of Souls and Gardens of Joy, Oblectamen Spirituum et Viridarium Gaudiorum,” but Dr. Rieu observes that it agrees almost entirely with the work of Shamsu-d-dīn ash-Shahrazūrī described by Ḥājī Khalfa (Fluegel VI. 321.) It is in two parts, the first, an account of ancient philosophers, the second, of those subsequent to Muḥammad, and it contains 108 Lives (that described by Ḥājī Khalfa had 111.) Apparently Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā is the secondary title. It seems to have been written at Baṣra in 995 (1587). Its author wrote a commentary on Shahrawardī, a philosopher who was put to death at Aleppo by Saladin in 587 (1191). (D'Herbélot s.v. Scheherverdi.) There is a Per. trs. (T.O. No. 1579) of the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā by Maqṣūd ‘Alī of Tabrīz, begun under the orders of Akbar and completed under Jahāngīr. The translator calls the author that pattern of writers Shamsu-l-mulka wa-d-dīn Maulānā Shamsu-d-dīn Muḥammad Shahrazūrī. A.F. seems to have made considerable use of the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā; his account of the three Hermes in the notice of Enoch agrees closely with the Persian of Maqṣūd ‘Alī.

Shahrazūr is a town in the hill-country of Persia and apparently near the battle-field of Arbela. (Jarrett III. 80,81.) A.F. gives Shahrazūr as the name of a district also. (Meynard's Yāqūt, 356.) The name is said to mean the city of Zūr,—the son of Ẓoḥāq a Persian king and founder of the town.

↩

A.F. includes Ceylon in India (Hindūstān.) The Arabs call the mountain on which Adam was buried, Rāhūn.

↩

Richardson spells Abū Kais, after D'Herbélot, and says it is 3 m. from Mecca. (D'H. s.v. Abu Cais Mecca.) Abū qubais is a mountain n. of Mecca. Abraham is said to have proclaimed from it, the institution of pilgrimage.

↩

Nedjif about 11/2 m. (2 kil.) w. of Kūfa. (Réclus IX. 458) (Kūfah. Jarret III. 64.) Najf means high land and tumulus. A.F.'s account of Adam's burial-place is perhaps taken from the Nafā'isu-l-funūn, (B.M. No. 16,259a 827.)

↩

Much of A.F.'s account of the Patriarchs seems taken from the Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā of Mīr Khwānd (Mīrkhond) and the Ḥabību-s-siyar of his grandson, Khwānd Amir (Khondamīr) or from their sources. The Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā has been translated in part by Mr. Rehatsek, and his translation published by the Or. Trs. Fund. This work may advantageously be consulted in connection with A.F. See also Persian Ṭabarī, Zotenberg's trs.

The story of Iqlīmīyā is given in Ṭabarī, (Cap. XXX.) and in the Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā. According to one tradition, Cain murdered Abel on her account, as he was not willing that she should marry Abel. Her name is variously written Iqlīmīyā, Iqlīmā (Burhān-i-qāṭi‘ s. v.) and by Bayle, Calmana. Iqlīmīyā means litharge, foam of silver. After Abel's death, Iqlīmīyā was married to Seth.

↩

Muḥammadans spell this name like that of Bathsheba's husband, but there is no connection between the two persons. Uriah means “Light of Heaven.” (Ox. “Helps to the Bible.”) D'Herbelot, Art. Uriai says: “Les Arabes se servent de ce mot, qui est tiré du Chaldaïque et du Syriaque Ouraïa et Ouroïo, pour signifier un Maître ou Docteur de la première classe, tels qu'ont été, Edris, Khedher, Hermes, qui portent les titres de premier, sécond et troisième Maîtres ou Docteurs de l'Univers.” Chwolsohn in his work on the Sabæans, gives the variants, Arānī and Arāfī and comes to the conclusion that the word is not Syriac but merely a corruption of Orpheus. See I, 782 and 800 where he says, “sammt und sonders corruptionen aus Orpheus.” But may it not be connected with Ūr, i.e., the Ūr of the Chaldees or with the ūr which means light? The form Arānī is given by Mas‘ūdī (Book of Indication and Counsel, deSacy IX. 342 n.)

↩

This is the Muḥammadan division of the sciences. (Blochmann 279 n.) It is derived from Aristotle.

↩

The Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā (Trs.) has Ṣupha, but is unlikely that Mr. Rehatsek spelt an Ar. word with a p.

↩

The Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā says his mother was a houri. (Rehatsek I. 67.)

↩

i.e., he was the first monarch. He is also said to have first planted palms.

↩

According to Genesis, Enosh. lived 905 years.

↩

The Abū'l-farāj of the Āīn. (Jarrett 33.) His full name is Abū'l-farāj ‘Abdu-l-raḥmān b. ‘Alī Ibnu-l-jauzī'l-bakrī. He died 597 (1200). His work is called the Muntaẓam. (Rieu, Ar. Cat. No. 460.) Quatremère speaks of Ibn Jauzī as author of the Mirātu-z-zamān, but it appears that this was written by Ibn Jauzī's grandson, Abū'l-muẓaffar Yūsuf b. Kizughlī who died 654 (1256). (Rieu l. c. No. 465.)

↩

Qāẓī Naṣīru-d-dīn ‘Abdu-l-lāh b. ‘Umaru-l-baiẓāwī. (Jarrett II. 36n. and Rieu II. 823b.) His work is called the Niẓāmu-t-tawārikh, and is a general history from Adam to 674 (1275). He is best known as a commentator on the Koran.

↩

Text, Qainān.

↩

A town in Khūzistān, anciently the capital of Persia;—the Susa of Herodotus and Shusan of Scripture. According to the Persians, it was founded by Hūshang, grandson of Kaiūmarṯ (Gayomars). Mīr Khwānd ascribes the building of it to Kenan's son, Mahalalil and says that before the latter's time, men lived in caves.

↩

Blochmann (99) mentions Idrīs as the inventor of the Hebrew alphabet.

↩

Text, Aghāzīmūn. See Al-bīrūnī's India and Chwolsohn on the Sabæans. Seth is the first Uria.

↩

Āīn II. 49 l.4 fr. ft. Jarrett III. 109 n.

↩

The phrase for “summoned” is da‘wat farmūd. The Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā (Per. trs. 17b, foot) has ū khalā'iq-i-rab‘-maskūn bahaftād ū dū zabān da‘wat numūd ū ‘ilm ū adab āmōkht. Mr. Rehatsek remarks that 72 is a common number in Muḥammadan theology, etc., and that David is spoken of as having 72 notes in his voice. Mas‘ūdī says (Meynard, 78) that after the Deluge, the 72 languages were divided as follows:— Shem 19, Ham 17, Japhet 36; total 72.

↩

The Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā has 108. (17b foot.) Abū'l-farāj (Pococke) ed. 1663, p. 6 has 180.

↩

Text, Zoha, but there is a var. Roha which I adopt, for the city meant is probably Edessa, the Roha of the Arabs and the modern Orfa. It is in Asiatic Turkey, east of the Euphrates. (Réclus IX. 445 and Lectures on the Jewish Church, Stanley, 6.) If, however, A.F. means Edessa, there must be some mistake on his part, for Edessa was not, I believe, taken by Hulākū Khān and it certainly was not destroyed, for it still exists. See Quatremère's Rashīdu-d-dīn (334) for a note (128) on a Roha mentioned by Rashīdu-d-dīn as having been taken by Hulākū Khān. In the Persian it is spelt ◌ and Quatremère translates “Houlagou en personne se dirigea vers Rouhah dont il se rendit maître.” The note says “J' ignore quelle est la ville que notre historien a voulu indiquer, et si le nom est correctement écrit.” Possibly the town is Riha or Riah S.W. of Aleppo. (Réclus IX. 765 and 772 n.)

↩

A.F. here refers to the destruction of the Ismailians by Hulākū, the grandson of Cingīz Khān, in the middle of the 13th century. Cf. Gibbon's remark that the extirpation of the Assassins or Ismailians of Persia by Hulākū may be considered a service to mankind.

↩

Lit. alighting of glory and renovation of felicity,—nuzūl-i-ijlāl ū taḥwīl-i-iqbāl.

↩

(Jarrett II. 10. No. 43.) He was known in the Middle Ages as Albumaser. This passage closely resembles the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā (166ft. ff.)

↩

This is Hūshang. (Ṭabarī, Zotenburg, I. 100.)

↩

Mas‘ūdī, de Saçy. Paris 1877, IX. 324 n. Their city was Kalwādha.

↩

The author of the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā distinguishes between Esculapius, who he says is the son of Āmūr, and Asqlīnus.

↩

◌ Manūf, but the ū seems wrong; the Āīn gives Manf or Minf. (Jarrett III. 75.) It is the Noph of the Bible. The Text here agrees closely with the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā.

↩

The Āīn gives this name to Athens. (Jarrett III. 78.)

↩

This passage occurs in the Tārīkh-i-ḥukamā. (Mīr Khwānd, Rehatsek I. 72.) The first of these three things receives explanation from another remark of Enoch (Mīr Khwānd, Rehatsek, II. Part I.) to the effect that a man should beware of uttering in the time of anger, words which will be a cause of disgrace to him. It may be noted here that Mīr Khwānd's account of some of the patriarchs is to be found in two places,—at the beginning of his work and again among the biographies of the philosophers.

↩

Koran, Sura 71. Noah is said to have invented the nāqūs ◌ =wooden gong.

↩

This passage occurs in the Tārīkhi-ḥukamā (Maqṣūd ‘Alī).

↩

This is the Muḥammadan tradition. (Ṭabarī, Zotenberg, I, 108 and Koran, Sale, Cap. XI). “And the oven poured forth water, or, as the original literally signifies, boiled over, which is consonant to what the Rabbins say, that the water was boiling hot.” (Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā, Rehatsek I, 90).

↩

Ar. Sūqu-ṯ-ṯamānīn. It was at the foot of the mountain Al Jūdi, i.e., Mount Ararat. (D'Herbelot art. Thamanin). D'H. states that it is called also Jazīra Banī ‘Umar (in Mesopotamia). Mas‘ūdī says (Meynard, 74) that Al-Jūdi is in the country of Baṣra and in Jazīra ibn ‘Umar, that the eighty persons were 40 men and 40 women and that Ṯamānīn existed in his day, 332 H.

↩

Referring apparently to the hailstorm—the seventh plague of Egypt, or perhaps to the overflowing of the Red Sea.

↩

Shahrazūrī describes Noah's Deluge as universal (17b).

↩

It is curious that A.F. should assert there was no trace of Noah's Flood in the Indian annals for Satyavrata and his Flood have often been identified with Noah and the Deluge. Probably A.F. identified Satyavrata's Flood with that which occurred before the birth of Adam, for Satyavrata belongs to the beginning of the Satya Yuga and apparently A. F. assigned Noah's Flood to the commencement of the Kali Yuga and the beginning of the reign of Yudhiṣṭhira, for he gives 4696 years as the interval between these events and the 40th Akbar. (Jarrett II-15 and 22).

↩

Or, “country of the blacks.” (Jarrett III, 108 and 109. Apparently A. F. includes the Arabs among the descendants of Ham.

↩

◌ Ṣaqlāb,—the original Sclavonia, between the Oxus and the Dnieper, (Jarrett III, 104.) In the Āīn (Text) Ṣaqlāb is described as a city of Rūm which must be a mistake for Rūs. It seems that Ṣaqlāb and Chalybes are the same word.

↩

Jarrett III, 327. There A.F. apparently repudiates the idea that the Hindus are descended from Ham.

↩

Corresponds to Mizraim of the Bible.

↩

Arpachshad of Genesis 10, 22.

↩

Ashur.

↩

Āīn, Madā'in of Chosroes. (Jarrett III, 65 and 96. Also III, 326.)

↩

Ahwāz, a town in Khūzistān (Persia) on the Karun, (Jarrett III, 65) famous for its weir. (Réclus IX, 287 and Curzon Pro. G. S. 1890.)

↩

Var. Īfan and Īqīn and (Ḥabību-s-siyar) Īqan. Probably the last is correct for the name seems connected with Iconium (Koniah) and to be that of the eponymous hero of the city.

↩

So too Ḥabību-s-siyar but it calls him Nūraj.

↩

Tubal. Miles calls him Hakyal. Perhaps the same as Tūmbel. (Jarrett II, 245 and 250.) Tambol appears as a person's name in the Tārīkh-i-Rashīdī and Bābar's Memoirs. Tembal-khāna was also a name for Farghāna, Bābar, 196.

↩

D'Herbelot art. Macran. Mekrān here appears to be the well-known maritime province of Baluchistan.

↩

The passage is obscure and perhaps there is an error in the Text. Maulavī ‘Abdu-l-ḥaqq ‘Abīd, to whom I referred the passage, writes: “The meaning is not clear. There may be some misprint in the Text. As the passage stands, it may be translated, ‘I have uttered over it the Great Name, in order that the simple, not getting clue to it, may not depart from his (your) command (or counsel), or he actually uttered the Great Name over it.” The usual account is that Noah engraved the Great Name on the stone, and possibly we should read ◌ “engraved,” for ◌ “uttered,” in the last clause. A friend has referred me to the passage in Revelations II, 17, “I will give him a white stone, and upon the stone a new name written, which no one knoweth saving he that receiveth it.”

↩

Bābar, Erskine xlvii. Rashīdu-d-dīn, Quatremère's elaborate note, 428, and Vullers II, 334a.

↩

The reputed father of Gog and Magog and, apparently, the Scriptural Mishesh.

↩

Gomer of Genesis. Probably the Text k is the MS g.

↩

Guz in Vullers II, 609a. Gozz in Mas‘ūdī I, 212. The supposed ancestor of the Turkomāns.

↩

D'Herbelot calls him Taraga and the ninth son, Isan.

↩

A note to Text states that Ōghlān means son in Turkish.

↩

? Issigh-kul. Text, Sīlūl. Perhaps the river Selenga, but the description better applies to the lake of Issik-kul (Hot Water) which is said to be ten times the size of Lake Geneva. Réclus VI, 350. It lies N. of Yarkand. Its waters do not freeze. The Shajaratu-l-atrāk calls it Jaeelgan. (Miles 25).

↩

The discovery is said to have been made accidentally by his son Tūnag or Tūtak.

↩

Shajratu-l-atrāk, Abluchi Khān.

↩

D'Herbélot, “Great Dignity.”

↩

This refers to their becoming idolaters. (Khāfī Khān I, 3).

↩

I.e., eight in all, Tātār being one. (Shajratu-l-atrāk, Miles 29). According to D'Herbélot (Art. Tatar) Alinja Khān, the father, is required to make up the eight.

↩

Vullers 48Ib. The generations are said to end with Īl Khān because, in his time, the Mughul race was all but extirpated. If the statement of the Turks, mentioned below, that this catastrophe occurred 1000 years after Aghūz's death, be correct, it is evident that far more than nine generations must have intervened between Mughul and Īl Khān.

↩

Steingass s.v. “Nine, hence present, gift, such being offered to kings, etc., by nines, as a sacred number.”

↩

I.e., the Black Prince. A.F. omits to mention that he was put to death by his own son, Aghūz. (Khāfī Khān I, 5.)

↩

I.e., black sand or dust. The Text wrongly has ◌ Qarāqaram. The Āīn mentions the place as belonging to the Sixth Climate. (Jarrett III, 102). The Āīn (Text II, 46), describes it as a mountain in Turkistān (not Kohistān as Jarrett has it) and the editor says (l.c.n.) that many MSS. read ◌ Qarāqūm. This is the correct reading. (Vullers s.v. II, 717b, and D'Herbélot art: Caracum.) In Gladwin's Āīn the lat. and long. of Qarāqūm and of Khānbālīgh which immediately follows, are given; the long. for Qarāqūm being 115° and for Khānbālī gh 124°.

N.B. Khānbālīgh is described in Text as the capital of Cathay, not of China.

↩

Erdmann, ◌ Urtāq and Gaztāq. D'Herbélot calls them Artak and Ghertak, and says they are part of Mount Imaus (Paradise Lost III, 431), and that the city of Caracum lies between them, Artak being N. and Ghertak S. He gives the long. as 116° which agrees very well with Gladwin. Of course both longs. are calculated from the Fortunate Isles. Greenwich long. is between 72° and 80.° The lat. of the Karakoram Pass (Imperial Gazeteer, Hunter), is 35° 33" or about 11° less than that given in the Āīn. (46 N.). This would imply that Qarāqūm and Qarāqaram are totally different names and places, but on the other hand, D'Herbélot gives the lat. of Caracum as 36° 36". There is an account of the city of Karacum (Caracorum) in Gibbon who (Cap. 64) makes it about 600 m. N.W. Pekin. It was also called Holin.

↩

Text, Aghūr. For account of him see Khāfī Khān I, 4 and 5, D'Herbélot s.v. Ogouz Khān, Shajratu-l-atrāk (Miles) 30. The story is that Aghūz refused immediately after birth to take the breast, and that his mother had a dream in which he told her that he would not permit her to suckle him until she became a believer in Islām. Accordingly she secretly embraced that faith. Also, when he was a twelve-month old, he told the conclave assembled to decide upon his name, that it was Aghuz (Khāfī Khān l.c.). These things occurred long before the birth of Muḥammad, but the latter was only the Seal (last) of the Prophets, and the religion of Islām is considered to have existed from all time. Hence the Mu. formula of “Peace be upon him” is applied to Adam and others of the patriarchs.

↩

◌ yāsā. Text, bāyistahāī which is an error. The best known yāsā are those of Cingiz Khān. (Miles l. c. 90 and Gibbon and D'Herbélot art. Jassa).

↩

Turkistān or Transoxiana. It is said to have been named after Tūr, the son of Farīdūn (D'H. art. Mogal), but if so, A.F.'s use of it here is an anachronism, for he describes Tūr as nearly exterminating the Mughuls about a thousand years after Aghūz Khān's death.

↩

This may mean the whole Greek Empire or only Asia Minor (Roumelia).

↩

Afranj is properly the name of a people, viz., the Franks. Rauẓatu-ṣ-ṣafā, V, gives a similar list.

↩

The meanings of this and following terms are given by Mīr Khwānd and Miles. Erdmann, the authority often quoted by Howorth, writes ◌ qārlūk, and says it means snow-lord. Qipcāk is said to mean a hollow tree.

↩

Said to mean “Broken” and “Three arrows.” The legend of origin is given by Miles. Text, Bājuq for Ujūq. Uq is an arrow, and uc means three. The etymologies are also given in Abū-l-ghāzī Des Maison 24. The name Buzmaq or “Broken” was given to the three elder sons because they brought in three pieces of a golden bow. The three younger brought in three golden arrows.

↩

The conjunction ū has dropped out of the Text, but occurs in the Lucknow ed. and in No. 564.

↩

Text, Irqīl, but admittedly this is against all the MSS.

↩

Apparently he is Kun's brother, and the “illustrious father” must be Aghūz.

↩

According to another account, he was Āī Khān's brother.

↩

Mangala may also mean sun, or the forehead, (Tar. Rash 7n.)

↩

Though this name is the heading of the Text, the narrative is in part that of Īl Khān's reign.

↩

There is perhaps a play on the words mirād and muṛād; the first meaning a precious stone possessed of wondrous qualities, the second success.

↩

Probably Naqūz is more correct.

↩

The Text does not distinctly say that the women were wives, the word used being ḥaram. One account says sisters.

↩

Nūshīrwān, a king of Persia, celebrated for his justice, reigned 531-579 A.D. Muḥammad congratulated himself on having been born (578 A.D.) in his reign.

↩

I do not understand the principle of this calculation. Yuldūz Khān, under whom the Mughuls emigrated from Irganaqūn, is the 29th ancestor, reckoning from Adam, and the total of 28 must be made up of 25 who lived previous to the flight to Irganaqūn plus three, viz., Qiyān, Tīmūr Tāsh and Mangalī, who are the only three denizens of that settlement whose names have been preserved. The period after the exodus (cir. 579 A.D.) up to the date of A.F.'s writing, was about 1,000 years, and in it there were 25 rulers including Akbar. But how do calculators reckon, upon these data, that the number of ancestors who lived in Irganaqūn for 2,000 years, was 25? One would rather expect the figure 50. But perhaps the calculation is based on lives twice as long as later ones. (Gibbon Cap. 42n.) Apparently it is roughly based on a progressive diminution of the period of human life. A.F. reckons that 7,000 years more or less, elapsed from the birth of Adam to 40th Akbar (1596). From Adam to the death of Īl Khān, 4,000 years are counted, and in this period, were 25 generations. (A.F. speaks of 28, but this is inclusive of Īl Khān's son, Qiyān and Tīmūr Tāsh and Mangalī Khwāja, viz., the grandfather and father of the Yuldūz who came out from Irgānaqūn). In the thousand years between the emigration and 40th Akbar, there were also 25 generations, and so, apparently, it was calculated that for the intervening 2,000 years (required to make up the 7,000) there must have been 25 generations. In other words, there were 4,000 years in which the length of a generation was 160 years, 2,000 in which it was 80 and 1,000 in which it was 40. I do not, however, know what authority A.F. had for his 2,000 years. “The tradition of the Mughuls,” says Gibbon (Cap. 42n.) “of the 450 years which they passed in the mountains, agrees with the Chinese periods of the History of the Huns and Turks. “(De Guignes Tom. I, Par. II, 376), and of the 20 generations from their restoration to Gingis.” (Cingīz Khān). Howorth (I, 35) puts the period at 400 years. Rashīdu-d-dīn mentions a period of 2,000 years, but this is the interval from the destruction of Īl Khān and the Mughuls by the Tātārs up to the date of Rashīdu-d-din's writing, consequently the former event occurred about 700 B.C. D'Ohsson says (I, Cap. II, 21) that according to Mughul traditions, their defeat by the Tātārs occurred 2,000 years before the birth of Cingīz Khān. (Jan. 1155 A.D.) D'Herbélot (art. Genghiz Khān) says that the Mughuls remained in Irganaqūn for several generations, and that the period was over 1,000 years. None of these statements supports A.F.'s chronology. Possibly he wrote one and not two thousand.

↩

This description is taken from Ẓafarnāma, Prolegomena.

↩

Also spelled Jūbīna and Cūbīna. For further information regarding the Muḥammadan accounts of the descendants of Japheth, I beg to refer the reader to the full and interesting note of Major Raverty which begins at p. 869 of his translation of the Ṭabaqāt-i-nāṣirī.

↩