| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Bélót, | . | 322,740 | . | 100 | 10,000 | Baloch. |
| Sahlór, | . | 1,700,000 | . | 40 | 700 | Chandel and others. |
| Kahlór, (Punjáb Hill State), | . | 1,800,000 | . | 50 | 1000 | Do. |
It is situated in the first, second and third climates simultaneously. Before Tattah was comprised in this province, its length from Fírózpúr to Sewistán, was 403 kós and its breadth from Khatpur1 to Jaisalmír, 108 kós, but since its inclusion, it measures to Khach (Gandává) and Mekrán, 660 kós. On the east, it marches with the Sarkár of Sirhind; on the north with Shór; on the south, with the Súbah of Ajmer, and on the west, with Khach and Mekrán. For facility of reference, the two territories are separately described. Its principal rivers are the six already mentioned. The Bihat (Jhelum) joins the Chenáb near the parganah of Shór and after a course of 27 kós, they unite with the Ravi at Zafarpúr and the three flowing collectively in one stream for 60 kós, enter the Indus near U´ch. Within 12 kos of Fírózpúr, the Biáh joins the Sutlej which then bears several names, viz., Har, Hári, Danḍ, Núrni,2 and in the neighbourhood of Multán, confluent with the former four, their accumulated waters unite. Every river that discharges itself into the Indus takes its name of Sindh. In Tattah, they call it Mihrán.1
To the north are the mountains. Its climate is similar to that of Lahor which it resembles in many aspects, but in Multán, the rainfall is less and the heat excessive.
Multán is one of the oldest cities of India: Long. 107° 35'; Lat. 29° 52'2. It has a brick fort and a lofty minaret adds to its beauty. Shaikh Baháu'ddín Zakaríyá and many other saints here repose.
Bhakkar (Bhukkur) is a notable fortress; in ancient chronicles it is called Manṣúrah.3 The six rivers united roll beneath it, one channel passing the southern face of the fort, the other the northern. The rainfall is inconsiderable, the fruits excellent.
Between Siwi1 and Bhakkar is a vast desert, over which for three months of the hot season the simoom blows.
The river Sind (Indus) inclines every few years alternately to its southern and northern banks and the village cultivation follows its course. For this reason the houses are constructed of wood and grass.
This Súbah comprises three Sarkárs of 88 parganahs, all under assessment for crops paying special rates. The measured land is 3,273,932 bighas, 4 biswas. The gross revenue is 15 krors, 14 lakhs, 3,619 dáms. (Rs. 378,590-8-0), of which 30 lakhs, 59,948 dáms (Rs. 76,498-11-2), are Suyúrghál. The local Militia consists of 18,785 Cavalry and 165,650 Infantry.
Containing 47 Mahals, 558,649 Bíghas, 4 Biswas. Revenue, 53,916,318 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 5,494,236 Dáms. Cavalry, 8,965. Infantry, 90,650.
Containing 9 Mahals, 52,090 Bíghas. Revenue, 17,240,147 Dáms. Cavalry, 1,410. Infantry, 17,100.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| A´damwáhan,2 | 5,386 | 369,445 | . | 30 | 700 | Ḥasar.3 |
| Jalálábád, | 5,000 | 299,798 | . | 10 | 200 | Bhím. |
| Dunyapúr, | 27,889 | 1,876,862 | 11,998 | 50 | 400 | U´ki,1 Ránú. |
| Rájpúr, | 1,368 | 90,397 | . | 20 | 300 | Júnah. |
| Shérgaṛh, | 75,000 | 5,741,200 | . | 400 | 4000 | Kachhi, Júnah, Bikánah,2 Maláḥ. |
| Fatḥpúr, | 61,797 | 4,008,661 | 24,596 | 500 | 5000 | Júnah. |
| Kahrór,3 | 47,695 | 305,856 | 40,931 | 100 | 2000 | Júnah. |
| Kháibúldi,4 | 80,411 | 594,233 | . | 200 | . | Jat and another name illegible. |
| Ghalu5 Khárah, | 19,820 | 1,201,086 | . | 100 | 2000 | Kalu, Jat. |
Containing 11 Mahals, 137,629 Bíghas, 13 Bíswas. Revenue, 9,863,341 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 207,382 Dáms. Cavalry, 775. Infantry, 14,550.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Islámpúr, has a brick fort, | 23,085 | 1,550,896 | 60,394 | 1000 | 3000 | Bhím, Maral. |
| Ismạílpúr, | 900 | 49,932 | . | 5 | 50 | Maral. |
| Multán town, has a brick fort, | 2,324 | 1,719,168 | 88,980 | 50 | 1000 | Bhím, Shaikhzádah. |
| Tulambah, | 19,310 | 1,200,778 | 15,766 | 300 | 5000 | Sóhú. |
| Villages of the parganah of Chankhandi, | 2,927 | 191,054 | . | . | . | |
| Suburban district of Multán, | 35,925 | 2,288,354 | 37,463 | . | . | Bhím. |
| Villages of parganah of Khatpúr, | 2,487 | 149,578 | . | . | . | |
| Do. Do. Deg6 Rávi, | 897-14 | 50,146 | . | . | . | |
| Sháh Aálampúr, | 24,121 | 1,555,563 | 1,180 | 200 | 4000 | |
| Villages of parganah of Kháibúldi, | 7,584-19 | 490,654 | . | . | . | |
| Matílah, | 2,068 | 608,418 | 3,598 | 20 | 500 | Jat. |
Containing 6 Mahals, 83,229 Bíghas, 18 Bíswas. Revenue, 5,113,883 Dáms. Cavalry, 770. Infantry, 9,500.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenne D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Irajpúr and Dég Rávi, | 37,230 | 2,377,300 | . | 100 | 2000 | Kharal. |
| Chaukhandi, | 7,620 | 215,830 | . | 100 | 2000 | Do. |
| Khatpúr, | 8,387 | 505,398 | . | 500 | 3000 | Jat, Sindh. |
| Dalibhati, | 3,768-18 | 256,569 | . | 20 | 500 | Kharal.1 |
| Kalbah, | 16,208 | 958,786 | . | 50 | 2000 | Jat, Sóhú. |
Containing 4 Mahals, 34,812 Bíghas. Revenue, 2,178,192 Dams. Suyurghál, 13,399 Dáms. Cavalry, 220. Infantry, 2,000.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Villages of Islámpúr, | 5,775 | 373,357 | . | . | . | |
| Rangpúr, | 22,907 | 1,410,737 | 10,737 | 200 | 2000 | Jat. |
| Raépur Kanki, | 5,500 | 306,068 | 2,662 | 20 | 500 | Bhím. |
| Miscellaneous villages, 1 Mahal, | 600 | 38,030 | . | . | . |
Containing 17 Mahals,2 205,893 Bíghás, 13 Biswas. Revenue, 18,820,255 Dáms. Suyúrghal, 38,688 Dáms. Cavalry, 5,800. Infantry, 57,600.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Ubaurah, | 11,320 | 915,256 | 4,684 | 30 | 500 | Dhar. | ||
| U´ch, | 29,056 | 1,910,140 | . | 100 | 400 | Shaikzadah, Bukhari Sayyid. | ||
| Bhurtiwáhan, (var. and G. Dáman), | 16,696 | 1,336,029 | 13,564 | 200 | 2000 | Rájpút, Lodhi. | ||
| Jamshér, | 4,334 | 348,037 | . | 150 | 2000 | Baloch, Bholdi and Nardi.1 | ||
| Dúdái, has a brick fort, | 40,520-11 | 2,400,000 | . | 4000 | 30,000 | Dúdái.2 | ||
| Diwár i Awwal, (Cunningham. Diráwal), | 2,718 | 140,000 | . | 50 | 500 | Rájput, Kotwál. | ||
| Dúd Khán, | 17,890 | 1,440,000 | . | . | . | |||
| Villages of Rájpúr, | 452 | 29,854 | . | . | . | |||
| Rupari, | 12,075 | 1,080,000 | . | . | . | |||
| Sítpúr, | 44,538-8 | 4,608,000 | . | 1000 | 20,000 | Afghán. | ||
| Seoráhi, | 5,124 | 28,800 | . | 20 | 100 | Dhar. | ||
| Villages of Fateḥpúr, | 5,224 | 330,779 | . | . | . | |||
| ” | ” | Kaharór, | 1,384 | 87,289 | . | . | . | |
| Majlol3 Gházípúr, | 40,521 | 2,400,000 | . | . | . | |||
| Mauh, has a brick fort. (Cunningham Moj.) | 9,083 | 707,069 | 20,440 | 50 | 1000 | Kuraishi. | ||
| Maróṭ, do. | 5,456 | 204,000 | . | 200 | 1000 | Bhatṭi. | ||
| Mahanḍ | 9,336-12 | 8,014,000 | . | 200 | 1000 |
Containing 29 Mahals, 1,433,767 Bíghas, 8 Biswas. Revenue, 129,334,153 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 2,079,170 Dáms. Cavalry, 5,210. Infantry, 53,300.
Containing 10 Mahals, 710,946 Bíghas, 10 Biswas. Revenue, 88,808,855 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 1,481,564 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 2,400. Infantry, 20,400.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Paṭṭan, (Pák Pattan) has a brick fort, | 49,014 | 2,628,928 | 599,989 | 100 | 2000 | Bhíl, Dhókar |
| Dípálpur Lakhi, has a brick fort, | 242,344-11 | 13,514,059 | 499,535 | 500 | 7000 | Jat, Khokhar, Kasú,1 Bhaṭṭi. |
| Dhanaksháh,2 has a brick fort, | 60,676-1 | 3,484,375 | 37,152 | . | 400 | |
| Deotír, | 40,730 | 2,489,850 | 23,400 | 50 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Raḥmatábád, | 38,285 | 1,825,009 | . | 100 | 2000 | Baloch, Khokhar. |
| Ḳabúlah,3 has a brick fort, | 86,615-12 | 4,803,817 | . | 1000 | 2000 | Júsah4 Rúmi. |
| Ḳiyámpúr Lakhi, has a brick fort, | 54,678-19 | 2,008,274 | 38,855 | 300 | 2000 | Bhaṭṭi, Jat. |
| Ḳalnáki Lakhi, | 55,243-3 | 2,385,969 | 93,809 | 50 | 1000 | Do. do. |
| Khokaráín Lakhi, | 21,130 | 1,011,715 | 35,383 | 150 | 1000 | Khokhar. |
| Lakhi Losḳáni,5 | 61,519-16 | 3,156,759 | 5,940 | 100 | 2000 | Bhaṭti, Khilji. |
Containing 6 Mahals, 193,495 Bíghas, 9 Biswas. Revenue, 1,175,393 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 1,100. Infantry, 14,000.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Bahrahpál,6 | 18,717-9 | 1,175,393 | . | 50 | 500 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Bábá Bhoj, has a fort, | 39,385 | 2,020,256 | 20,256 | 150 | 2000 | Sayyid, Jat. |
| Chahni,7 | 25,993 | 1,200,600 | 600 | 50 | 2000 | Sayyid, &c. |
| Raḥímábád, | 24,329 | 1,182,714 | . | 50 | 500 | Kharal, Baloch. |
| Ṣadkharah,8 | 59,447 | 3,551,630 | 20,976 | 300 | 4000 | Do. |
| Mandháli, | 25,624 | 2,703,429 | . | 500 | 5000 | Bhím. |
Containing 7 Mahals, 142,856 Bíghas, 2 Biswas. Revenue, 8,534,915 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 5,808 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 710. Infantry, 6,300.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Khánpúr, | 19,599-18 | 1,285,740 | 80,380 | 30 | 500 | Kharal. |
| Dalchi Chandhar, | 9,153-12 | 605,557 | 1,620 | 50 | 1000 | Chandhar. |
| Shahzádah Baloch, | 12,749-12 | 789,742 | . | 100 | 1000 | Baloch. |
| Aábidi A´bád, | 5,975 | 343,932 | . | 10 | 300 | Jat. |
| Faryádábád, | 18,708 | 1,098,694 | . | 20 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Kharal, | 33,732 | 1,907,069 | 2,800 | 300 | 2000 | Khari. |
| Mahés, | 42,944 | 2,509,182 | . | 200 | 500 |
Containing 6 Mahals, 386,470 Bíghas, 7 Biswas. Revenue, 20,580,771 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 549,972 Dáms. Cavalry, 1,000. Infantry, 12,300.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Jalálábád, | 34,475-7 | 1,739,289 | . | 50 | 1000 | Ranghar, Bhaṭṭi,1 Jat. |
| Jangal, | 18,012 | 653,516 | . | 300 | 4000 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Aálampúr, | 31,008-10 | 1,579,558 | . | 50 | 1000 | Ranghar, Jat. |
| Fírózpúr, | 217,710-17 | 11,479,404 | 199,404 | 500 | 3000 | Afghán, Ranghar. |
| Villages of Lakhi Ḳabúlah, | 29,185 | 1,636,550 | . | . | . | |
| Muḥammadwaṭ, | 56,614-13 | 3,492,454 | 350,568 | 100 | 3600 | Bhaṭṭi, Khokhar. |
Containing 12 Mahals, 282,013 Bíghas. Revenue, 18,424,947 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 600,419 Dáms. Cavalry, 4,600. Infantry, 11,100.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Alor, has a fort, | 143,700 | 1,132,150 | 20,550 | 200 | 500 | Dharejah.1 |
| Bhakkar, has a strong fort, | . | 74,362 | . | 200 | 1000 | Mehar and Rahár. |
| Jándolah, | 57,847 | 3,102,709 | 85,064 | 400 | 800 | Jahna.2 |
| Jatóí, | 179,821-14 | 2,346,873 | 156,841 | 400 | 800 | |
| Darbélah, | 121,146 | 1,262,761 | 68,872 | 200 | 500 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Sankar, | 100,818 | 1,808,628 | 32,332 | 500 | 1000 | Sahéjah.3 |
| Sewi, | . | 1,381,930 | . | 500 | 1500 | |
| Fatḥpúr, | 8,050-10 | 477,859 | . | 200 | 1000 | Sahéjah, Dháréjah. |
| Khajánah,4 | 10,063 | 645,205 | . | 200 | 1000 | Jáman. |
| Khára Kákan, | 154,151 | 2,732,331 | 138,608 | 500 | 1000 | Dháréjah. |
| Kákhari, (var. Kákri), | 178,338-16 | 2,106,431 | 63,208 | 500 | 1000 | Mankrérah. |
| Mánhalah, | 128,078 | 1,353,713 | 28,944 | 500 | 1000 | Dháréjah (var. Hárejah). |
| Years. | |
| Shaikh Yúsuf, reigned | 2 |
| Sulṭán Maḥmud6 (var. Muḥammad Sháh) | 17 |
| ” Ḳuṭbu'ddín, his son | 16 |
| ” Ḥusain, his son | 30 |
| Sulṭán Firóz, his son | 1 |
| ” Ḥusain, a second time. | |
| ” Maḥmúd, son of Sulṭán Firóz | 27 |
| ” Ḥusain, son of Sulṭán Firóz | 1 |
| Sháh Ḥusain, (Arghún), ruler of Sind. | |
| Mirzá Kámrán. | |
| Sher Khán. | |
| Salím Khán. | |
| Sikandar Khán. |
At one period the province was subject to the sovereigns of Delhi: at another it was under the control of the rulers of Sind, and for a time was held by the princes of Ghazni. After its conquest by Mụizzu'ddín Sám (Ghori), it continued to pay tribute to Delhi. In the year A. H. 847 (A. D. 1443) when Sulṭán Aláu'ddín reigned at Delhi, and constituted authority fell into contempt, every chief in possession of power, set up a pretension to independence. A noisy faction raised Shaikh Yúsuf Ḳuraishi, a disciple of Shaikh Baháu'ddín Zakaríya, to supremacy. He was subsequently deposed and proceeded with haste to the court of Sulṭán Bahlól at Delhi. The sovereignty now devolved upon one of the Langáh family, who assumed the title of Sulṭán Maḥmúd Sháh. It is related that this chief had given his daughter in marriage to Shaikh Yúsuf, and on the strength of this connection, used frequently to visit her alone, till one night by a successful intrigue he accomplished his design on the throne. During the reign of Sulṭán Ḳuṭbu'ddín, Sulṭán Maḥmúd Khilji advanced from Málwah against Multán but returned without effecting anything. Some maintain that the first of the Langáh family who was raised to the throne was Ḳuṭbu'ddín. In the reign of Sulṭán Husain, Bahlól sent (his son) Barbak Sháh with a force to reinstate Shaikh Yúsuf, but they returned unsuccessful. Sulṭán Ḥusain becoming old and doting, placed his eldest son upon the throne under the title of Firóz Sháh, and withdrew into retirement. His Wazír Imadu'l Mulk, poisoned him in revenge for the murder of his own son and Sulṭán Ḥusain a second time resumed the sceptre and appointed Maḥmúd Khán, son of Sulṭán Firóz, his heir. On the death of Sulṭán Ḥusain, after a reign of 30 or 34 years,1 Sulṭán Maḥmúd ascended the throne. During his reign several incursions were made by the Mughals who, however, retired discomfited. Some malicious intriguers through jealousy created a misunderstanding between the Sulṭán and Jám Bayazíd who had long held the office of prime minister, and misrepresentations cunningly made in a roundabout way, brought them into open conflict. The minister withdrew from Multán to Shór and read the khuṭbah in the name of Sulṭán Sikandar Lódi. On the death of Sulṭán Maḥmúd, his infant son was raised to the throne as Sulṭán Ḥusain (II). Mírzá Sháh Ḥusain (Arghún) marched from Tattah and took Multán and entrusted its charge to Langar Khán. Mírzá Kámrán dispossessed him of it and after him Shér Khán, Salím Khán and Sikandar successively held it till the splendour of Humayún's equal administration filled Hindustán with its brightness and secured its peace. At the present day under the just sway of His Majesty his subjects find there an undisturbed repose.
During a long period this was an independent territory but now forms part of the imperial dominions. Its length from Bhakkar to Kach and Mekrán is 257 kós, its breadth from the town of Budín to Bandar Láhari,1 100 kós, and again from the town of Chándo one of the dependencies of Bhakkar, to Bikanér is 60 kós. On the east lies Gujarát: to the north Bhakkar and Séwi:2 to the south, the ocean, and to the west Kach and Mekrán. It is situated in the second climate and lies in Longitude 102° 30'; Lat. 24° 10'.3
The ancient capital was Bráhmanábád,4 a large city. Its citadel had 1,400 towers, at an interval of a tanáb,5 and to this day there are many traces of its fortifications. Alor1 next became the metropolis and at the present day it is Tattah, also called Debal. The mountains to the north form several branches. One of them trends towards Ḳandahár, and another rising from the sea coast extends to the town of Kohbár, called Rámgar, and terminates in Sewistán and is there known as Lakkhi.2 This tract is inhabited by an important Baloch tribe called Kalmáni,3 consisting of twenty thousand cavalry. A fine breed of camels is here indigenous. A third range runs from Séhwán to Séwi and is called Khattar4 where dwells a tribe named Nohmardi that can raise a force of 300 horse and 7,000 foot. Below this tribe, there is another clan of the Baloch known as Naẓhari with a force of a thousand men. A good breed of horses comes from this tract. A fourth mountain chain touches Kach (Gandává) on one side, and on the other the Kalmáni territory, and is called Kárah inhabited by 4,000 Balochis.
In the winter season there is no need of poshtins (fur-lined coats) and the summer heats are moderate except in Sewistán. Fruits are of various kinds and mangoes are especially fine. In the desert tracts, a small kind of melon grows wild. Flowers are plentiful and camels are numerous and of a good breed. The means of locomotion is by boats of which there are many kinds, large and small, to the number of 40,000. The wild ass is hunted, and game, such as, hares, the kotah páchah1 and wild boars; fishing likewise is much pursued.
The assessment of the country is made on the system of division of crops,2 a third being taken from the husbandman. Here are salt-pits and iron mines. Sháli rice is abundant and of good quality. Six kós from Tattah is a mine of yellow stone, large and small slabs of which are quarried and used for building. The staple food consists of rice and fish. The latter is smoked and loaded in boats, and exported to the ports and other cities, affording a considerable profit. Fish-oil is also extracted and used in boat building. There is a kind of fish called palwah which comes up into the Indus from the sea, unrivalled for its fine and exquisite flavour. Milk-curds of excellent quality are made and keep for four months.
Near Sehwán is a large lake, two days' journey in length called Manchúr, in which artificial islands have been made by fishermen who dwell on them.
But the greatest of all wonders is the Liver-Eater (Jigar Khwár), an individual who by glances and incantations can abstract a man's liver. Some aver that under certain conditions and at certain times, he renders the person senseless upon whom he looks, and then takes from him what resembles the seed of a pomegranate, which he conceals for a time in the calf of his leg. During this interval the person whose liver is stolen remains unconscious, and when thus helpless, the other throws the seed on the fire which spreads out like a plate. Of this he partakes with his fellows and the unconscious victim dies. He can convey a knowledge of his art to whomsoever he wills, by giving him a portion of this food to eat and teaching him the incantation. ?? he is caught in the act and his calf be cut ?? and the seed extracted and given to his victim, the latter will recover. The followers of this art are mostly women.
They can convey intelligence from long distances in a brief space of time and if they be thrown into the river with a stone tied to them, they will not sink. When it is desired to deprive one of these of this power, they brand both sides of his head and his joints, fill his eyes with salt, suspend him for forty days in a subterraneous chamber, and give him food without salt, and some of them recite incantations over him. During this period he is called Dhachrah. Although his power then no longer exists, he is still able to recognize a Liver-Eater, and these pests are captured through his detection. He can also restore people to health by incantation or administering a certain drug. Extraordinary tales are told of these people that are beyond measure astonishing.
This country is the fourth Sarkár of the Súbah of Multán. From the confines of Uch to Tattah towards the north are rocky mountain ranges inhabited by various Baloch tribes, and on the south from Uch to Gujarát are sandhills in which region are the Ahshám bhatti1 and other numerous clans. From Bhakkar to Naṣírpúr and Umarkóṭ are the Sodah, Járejah and other tribes. This Súbah contains 5 Sarkárs subdivided into 53 parganahs. The revenue is 6,615,3932 dáms. (Rs. 165,383-13-2.)
Containing 18 Mahals. Revenue, 25,999,991 Dáms.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Láhari Bandar, | 5,521,419 | Bahrámpúr, | 1,311,612 |
| Batorá,3 | 4,932,286 | Bóri, | 434,305 |
| Jakár,1 | 348,462 | Sirsi Jám, | 142,641 |
| Járá, | 82,390 | Karhar, (var. and G. Karkar). | 3,328,476 |
| Darak, (var. Durg), | 2,970,441 | Lekín Khérah, | 535,795 |
| Dankari, (var. Dékri), | 315,921 | Maljah, | 1,105,606 |
| Ratnah, | 842,144 | Mánjar, | 1,221,752 |
| Sankúrah,2 | 2,108,097 | Niẓámpúr, | 352,724 |
Containing 11 Mahals. Revenue, 11,784,586 Dáms.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Bágh Fatḥ, | 340,173 | Karóri, | 529,937 |
| Bélah, | 656,317 | Laundá, | 1,119,973 |
| Hajkán, | 555,699 | Mandni, (var. and G. Mandri). | 694,269 |
| Jaun, | 3,165,418 | Madúi, | 2,352,605 |
| Rahbán | 742,973 | Nubiyár, (var. and G. Napiyár). | 1,280,439 |
| Detached villages3 | 436,783 |
9 Mahals. Revenue, 15,546,808 Dáms.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Bátar, (var. Pátar G. Palar) | 2,020,884 | Khaṭ, | 1,329,923 |
| Baghbánán, | 1,948,152 | Sub. dist. of Sewistán, has a | |
| Batan (var. and T. Patan), | 1,902,033 | strong fort, | 1,669,732 |
| Búsíkán (var. and G. Bústkán, | Káhán, | 1,640,764 | |
| T. Lusigán), | 1,825,190 | Lakháwat (var. Lakiáwat), | 1,231,776 |
| Janjah, | 1,978,953 |
7 Mahals. Revenue, 7,834,600 Dáms.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Umarkóṭ, | 1,057,802 | Kásár, | 401,738 |
| Ṭalsarah, | 326,104 | Márkandan, | 623,396 |
| Samáwáni, (var. and G. | Naṣírpúr, | 1,878,126 | |
| Samádáni), | 3,031,530 | ||
| Kídál, (var. Kandál), | 515,904 |
8 Mahals. Revenue, 5,085,408 Dáms.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Arpúr, | 731,190 | Tewári, (var. Lawári), | 571,073 |
| Chakarhálah, | 747,175 | Khari Júnah, | 508,152 |
| Síyár, | 719,207 | Burkah Manáwali, | 490,368 |
| Gházípúr, | 983,655 | Barhi, | 333,588 |
1. The family of Tamím Anṣári during the ascendancy of the House of Umayyah.
2. The Sumra (Rájpút) line of 36 princes, reigned 500 years, (according to Ferishta—100—their names unrecorded).
3. Of the Samma dynasty.
| Years | Months | D. | |
| Jám Unar, reigned, | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| ” Júná, his brother, | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ” Banhatiyah, | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| ” Tamáchi, his brother, | 13 | and some months. | |
| ” Ṣaláḥu'ddín, | 11 | and do. | |
| ” Nizámu'ddín, his son, | 2 | and a fraction. | |
| ” Ali Shér Tamáchi, | 6 | and some months. | |
| ” Karán, son of Tamáchi, | 0 | 0 | 1½ |
| Fateḥ Khán, son of Sikandar, | 11 | and some months. | |
| Tughlak, his brother, | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| Mubárak, the chamberlain, | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Sikandar, b. Fatḥ Khán, | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Sanjar, commonly called Rádhan (var. and G. Rádman, | 8 | and some months. | |
| Jám Nizámu'ddín, known as Jám Nandá, (see Vol. I, p. 362), | 60 | and some months. | |
| Jám Firóz, his son. | |||
| ” Ṣaláḥu'ddín a relation of Firóz, | |||
| ” Firóz, a second time. | |||
In former times, there lived a Rájá named Siharas1 whose capital was Alór. His sway extended eastwards, as far as Kashmír and towards the west to Mekrán, while the sea confined it on the south and the mountains on the north. An invading army entered the country from Persia, in opposing which the Rájá lost his life. The invaders contenting themselves with devastating part of the territory, returned. Ráe Sáhi, the Rájá's son, succeeded his father, by whose enlightened wisdom and the aid of his intelligent minister Rám, justice was universally administered and the repose of the country secured. A Bráhman named Jach2 of an obscure station in life, attached himself to the minister's service and by flattery and address made himself of much consequence and was advanced to a post of dignity, and on the death of the minister, was chosen to succeed him. He basely and dishonourably carried on an intrigue with the Rájá's wife, which the Rájá, notwithstanding its disclosure to him by the ministers of State, refused to credit. During the Rájá's illness, the wicked wretch, in collusion with this shameless paramour, sent for the generals of the army separately, on pretence of consulting them and set them apart, and by seductive promises won over the several enemies of each to accomplish their death. When they were put out of the way and the Rájá too had breathed his last, he assumed the sovereignty.
The pursuers of worldly interests attached themselves to his cause and he took the Ráni to wife, thus garnering eternal pordition, but he laboured for the prosperity and increase of his dominions and seized upon Kach (Gandává), and Mekrán.
During the Caliphate of Omar (b. u'l) Khaṭṭab, Mughírah Abu'l Aáṣ1 advanced by way of Bahrain to Debal, but the troops there opposed him and he was killed in the engagement. In the Caliphate of Othmán an intelligent explorer2 was sent to ascertain the condition of Sind, and an army of invasion was under orders. The messenger, however, reported that if a large force were sent, supplies would fail, and a small one would effect nothing and he added many dissuasive representations. The Prince of the Faithful, Ali, despatched troops that occupied the borders of Debal but on hearing of the death of the Caliph they withdrew in haste to Mekrán. Muáwiyah twice despatched an army to Sind and on both occasions many of the troops perished.
Chach died after a prosperous reign of 40 years, and his youngest son Dáhir succeeded him on the throne. In the caliphate of Walíd. b. Abdu'l Malik, when Hajjáj was governor of Iráḳ, he despatched on his own authority Muḥammad Ḳásim his cousin and son-in-law to Sind who fought Dáhir in several engagements.3 On Thnrsday the 10th of Ramazán A. H. 99, (17th April 717) the Rájá was killed in action and the territory of Tattah became subject to the invaders. The two daughters of Rájá Dáhir, who had been made captive were sent with some valuable presents to the Caliph. In a spirit of revenge, they deceitfully represented to the Caliph that Muḥammad Ḳásim had dishonoured them. He therefore abstained from visiting them, and in a fit of fury gave orders that Ḳásim should be stuffed into a raw hide and despatched to his presence. The commands of the Caliph reached him when he was about to march against Hari Chand, king of Kanauj, and he obediently submitted to them. When he was thus carried to the court, the Caliph exhibited the spectacle to the two princesses who expressed their gratification in viewing the slayer of their father in this condition. This decision of the Caliph excites astonishment inasmuch as it was pronounced without deliberate investigation. It is the duty of just princes not to be swayed by the representation of any one individual, but to be circumspect in their inquiries, since truth is rare and falsehood prevalent, and more especially in regard to the recipients of their favour, towards whom the world burns with envy without just cause of resentment. Against the outwardly plausible and inwardly vicious they should be particularly on their guard, for many are the wicked and factious who speciously impose by their affected merit and by their misrepresentations bring ruin on the innocent.
After Muḥammad Ḳásim's death, the sovereignty of this country devolved on the descendants of the Banu Tamím Anṣári.1 They were succeeded by the Súmrah race who established their rule and were followed by the Sammas who asserted their descent from Jamshíd, and each of them assumed the name of Jám. In the reign of Jám Bánhatiyah2 Sulṭán Fíróz Sháh on three occasions led an army from Delhi against that prince, and obtained some conspicuous successes. On the third occasion, he took him prisoner and carried him to Delhi, leaving Sind under charge of his own officials. Subsequently being satisfied with his good will and capacity he reinstated him in his government. On the death of Jám Tughlak, the chamberlain Mubárak succeeded him through the efforts of a vain and seditious faction, and was followed by Sikandar the son of Jám Fatḥ Khán.
During the reign of Jám Nandá, Sháh Beg Arghún made a descent from Ḳandahár and took Séwi and leaving the command of it to his brother Sulṭán Muḥammad, returned to Ḳandahár. The Jám marched a force against Muḥammad who was killed in action. Sháh Beg made a second incursion and took possession of Sehwán and a considerable part of Sind and leaving his conquests in charge of his own people, withdrew.
In the reign of Jám Fíróz, a relative of his named Ṣaláḥu'ddín rose in rebellion and failing in his attempt, took refuge with Sulṭán Maḥmúd of Gujarát who received him graciously and assisted him with an army; Daryá Khán the prime minister of Jám Fíróz espoused his cause and the kingdom of Sind fell under his power without a blow. Subsequently the said Daryá Khán determined to restore Jám Fíróz who had withdrawn into private life, but who thus recovered his kingdom. Ṣaláḥu'ddín a second time advanced from Gujarát with a force furnished by the Sulṭán and occupied Sind. Fíróz retired to Ḳandahár and Sháh Beg supplied him with troops, and an engagement took place near Sehwán in which Ṣaláḥu'ddín and his son were slain. Thus Fíróz was again established in his kingdom. In the year A. H. 9291 (A. D. 1522-3) Sháh Beg took possession of Sind and Jám Fíróz retired to Gujarát, gave his daughter in marriage to Sulṭán Bahádur and was attached to the Court in the ranks of its nobles. Sind was now subject to Sháh Beg. This prince was the son of Mír Zu'n Nún Beg, the commander-in-chief of Sulṭán Husain Mirzá,2 who received the government of Ḳandahár. He fell fighting bravely against Shaibak Khán Uzbek who was engaged in hostilities with the sons of Sulṭán Husain Mirzá. His eldest son succeeded to the government of Ḳandahár, a prince of distinguished valour and versed in the learning of his age. At his death, his son Sháh Ḥusain ascended the throne and wrested Multán from Sulṭán Maḥmúd. After him Mirzá Isá son of Abdu'l Ali Tarkhán3 succeeded, followed by Muḥammad Payandah1 but this prince being subject to fits of mental estrangement, did not personally administer the government. Mirzá Jáni Beg, his son assumed the direction of affairs till His Majesty's victorious troops advanced into the country and reduced it to order, and Mirzá Jáni Beg was enrolled in the ranks of his nobility.
It is situated in the third and fourth climates, and comprises Kashmír, Pakli, Bimbar, Swát, Bajaur, Ḳandahár and Zábulistán. Its capital was formerly Ghaznah, but now Kábul.
It lies in the third and fourth climates. Its length from Ḳambar Ver to Kishan Ganga is 120 kós, and its breadth from 10 to 25 kós. On the east are Paristán and the river Chenáb: on the south-east Bánihál and the Jammú mountains: on the north-east, Great Tibet: on the west, Pakli and the Kishen Ganga river: on the south-west, the Gakkhar country: on the north-west, Little Tibet. It is encompassed on all sides by the Himalayan ranges. Twenty-six different roads lead into Hindustán but those by Bhimbhar2 and Pakli are the best and are generally practicable on horseback. The first mentioned is the nearest and it has several routes of which three are good, viz., (1) Hasti Bhanj3 which was the former route for the march of troops; (2) Pir Panjál,1 which His Majesty has thrice traversed on his way to the rose garden of Kashmír. If on these hills an ox or a horse be killed, storm clouds and wind arise with a fall of snow and rain; (3) Tangtalah.
The country is enchanting, and might be fittingly called a garden of perpetual spring surrounding a citadel terraced to the skies, and deservedly appropriate to be either the delight of the worldling or the retired abode of the recluse. Its streams are sweet to the taste, its waterfalls music to the ear, and its climate is invigorating. The rain and snowfall are similar to that of Turkestán and Persia and its periodical rains occur at the same season as in Hindustán. The lands are artificially watered2 or dependent on rain for irrigation. The flowers are enchanting fill the heart with delight. Violets, the red rose and wild narcissus cover the plains. To enumerate its flora would be impossible. Its spring and autumn are extremely beautiful. The houses are all of wood and are of four stories and some of more, but it is not the custom to enclose them. Tulips1 are grown on the roofs which present a lovely sight in the spring time. Cattle and sundry stores are kept in the lower storey, the second contains the family apartments, and in the third and fourth are the household chattels. On account of the abundance of wood and the constant earthquakes, houses of stone and brick are not built, but the ancient temples inspire astonishment. At the present day many of them are in ruins. Woollen fabrics are made in high perfection, especially shawls which are sent as valuable gifts to every clime. But the bane of this country is its people2 yet strange to say, notwithstanding its numerous population and the scantiness of the means of subsistence, thieving and begging are rare. Besides plums and mulberries, the fruits are numerous. Melons, apples, peaches, apricots are excellent. Although grapes are in plenty, the finer qualities are rare and the vines bear on mulberry trees. The mulberry is little eaten, its leaves being reserved for the silkworm. The eggs are brought from Gilgit and Little Tibet, in the former of which they are procured in greater abundance and are more choice. The food of the people is chiefly rice, wine, fish and various vegetables, and the last mentioned they dry and preserve. Rice is cooked and kept over night to be eaten. Though sháli rice is plentiful, the finest quality is not obtainable. Wheat is small in grain and black in colour, and there is little of it, and1 little consumed. Gram2 and barley are nowhere found. They have a species of sheep3 which they call Hándú delicate and sweet in flavour and wholesome. Apparel is generally of wool, a coat of which will last for some years. The horses are small, strong, and traverse difficult ground. There are neither elephants nor camels. The cows are black and ill-shaped, but give excellent milk and butter. There are artificers of various kinds who might be deservedly employed in the greatest cities. The bazár system is little in use, as a brisk traffic is carried on at their own places of business. Snakes, scorpions and other venomous reptiles are not found in the cities. There is a mountain called Mahádeva and in any spot whence its summit can be seen, no snake exists, but fleas,1 lice, gnats and flies are very common. From the general use of pellet-bows which are fitted with bow-strings, sparrows are very scarce. The people take their pleasure in skiffs upon the lakes, and their hawks strike the wild-fowl in mid-air and bring them to the boats, and sometimes they hold them down in the water in their talons, and stand on them, presenting an exciting spectacle.
Stags and partridges likewise afford sport and the leopard too is tracked. The carriage of goods is effected by boat, but men also carry great loads over the most difficult country. Boatmen and carpenters drive a thriving trade. The Bráhman class is very numerous.
Although Kashmír has a dialect2 of its own, their learned books are in the Sanskrit language. They have a separate character which they use for manuscript work, and they write chiefly on Túz which is the bark of a tree,3 worked into sheets with some rude art and which keeps for years. All their ancient documents are written on this. Their ink is so prepared as to be indelible by washing. Although, in ancient times, the learning of the Hindús was in vogue, at the present day, various sciences are studied and their knowledge is of a more general character. Their astrological art and astronomy are after the manner of the Hindús. The majority of the narrow-minded conservatives of blind tradition are Sunnis, and there are some Imámis and Núr Bakshis,1 all perpetually at strife with each other. These are chiefly from Persia and Turkestán. Their musicians are exceeding many and all equally monotonous, and with each note they seem to dig their nails into your liver. The most respectable class in this country is that of the Bráhmans, who notwithstanding their need of freedom from the bonds of tradition and custom, are true worshippers of God.
They do not loosen the tongue of calumny against those not of their faith, nor beg nor importune. They employ themselves in planting fruit trees, and are generally a source of benefit to the people. They abstain from flesh-meat and do not marry. There are about two thousand of this class.
The Tolah1 in this country is 16 máshas, each mashá being equal to 6 surkhs. The gold mohur weighs 16 dánis, each dáni equalling 6 surkhs, being 4 surkhs more than the ordinary mohurs of Delhi. Rop Sásnú2 is a silver coin of 9 máshas. The panchhu is of copper, equal to the fourth of a dám and is called kasérah. One-fourth of this is the bahgagni, of which again one-fourth is called shakri.
| 4 | kasérahs=1 | ráhat. | |
| 40 | kasérahs=1 | sásnú. | |
| 1½ | sásnú =1 | sikkah. | |
| 100 | sikkahs =1 | lakh | which, according to the imperial estimate, is |
equal to one thousand dáms.
The whole country is regarded as holy ground by the Hindú sages. Forty-five shrines are dedicated to Mahadeva, sixty-four to Vishnu, three to Brahmá, and twenty-two to Durga. In seven hundred places there are graven images of snakes which they worship and regarding which wonderful legends are told.3
Srinagar is the capital and is 4 farsakhs in length. The rivers Bihat, Már, and Lachmahkul1 flow through it. The last-mentioned runs occasionally dry: the second, at times, becomes so shallow that boats cannot pass. This has been a flourishing city from ancient times2 and the home of artificers of various kinds. Beautiful shawls are woven, and they manufacture woollen stuffs3 extremely soft. Durmah, paṭṭú and other woollen materials are prepared but the best are brought from Tibet. Mír Sayyid Ali Hamadáni4 resided for some time in this city, and a monastery founded by him still preserves his memory. To the east is a high hill known as the Koh i Sulaimán, and adjoining the city are two large lakes always full of water, and it is remarkable that their water will not deteriorate in good savour and wholesomeness for any length of time provided that their free exit is undisturbed.
Near the town of Brang is a long defile in which is a pool seven yards square and as deep as a man's stature. It is regarded as a place of great sanctity. Strange to say it is dry during eleven months, but in the Divine month of Urdi-bihisht (April), water bubbles forth from two springs. First in one corner of it is a cavity like a mortar called Sendh brári: when this becomes full, the spring rises in another corner called Sat ríshí. From these two sources the pool runs over. Sometimes it boils up for three hours, and at times for only a second. Then it begins to decrease till not a drop remains. At three periods of the day, viz., morning, noon and evening, this rise occurs. Various flowers are thrown in as offerings to either spring, and after the reflux of the water, the flowers of each votary are found in their respective springs.1
But this, like the divining cup is a contrivance of the ancients to secure the devotion of the simple.
In this vicinity also is a spring, which during six months is dry. On a stated day, the peasants flock to worship and make appropriatory offerings of a sheep or a goat. Water then flows forth and irrigates the cultivation of five villages. If the flush is in excess, they resort to the same supplications, and the stream subsides of its own accord. There is also another spring called Kokar Nág, the water of which is limpid, cold and wholesome. Should a hungry person drink of it, his hunger will be appeased,2 and its satisfaction in turn renews appetite. At a little distance, in the midst of a beautiful temple, seven fountains excite the wonderment of the beholder. In the summer time self-immolating ascetics here heap up a large fire around themselves, and with the utmost fortitude suffer themselves to be burnt to ashes. This they consider a means of union with the Deity. There is also a spring which produces touchstone, and to the north of it a lofty hill which contains an iron mine.
The village of Vej Brára, one of the dependencies of I´nch is a place of great sanctity. It was formerly a large city3 and contained wonderful temples. In the vicinity is an upland meadow called Nandimarg, of which I know not whether most to praise its level sweep of mead, the loveliness of its verdure and flowers, or the bountiful virtues of its streams and its air. In the village of Pampúr one of the dependencies of Víhí, there are fields of saffron to the extent of ten or twelve thousand bíghas, a sight that would enchant the most fastidious. At the close of the month of March and during all April, which is the season of cultivation,1 the land is ploughed up and rendered soft, and each portion is prepared with the spade for planting, and the saffron bulbs are hard in the ground. In a month's time they sprout and at the close of September, it is at its full growth, shooting up somewhat over a span. The stalk is white, and when it has sprouted to the height of a finger, it begins to flower one bud after another in succession till there are eight flowers in bloom. It has six lilac-tinted petals. Usually among six2 filaments, three are yellow and three ruddy. The last three yield the saffron. When the flowers are over, leaves appear upon the stalk. Once planted it will flower for six years in succession. The first year, the yield is small: in the second as 30 to 10. In the third year it reaches its highest point and the bulbs are dug up. If left in the same soil, they gradually deteriorate, but if taken up they may be profitably transplanted.
In the village of Zéwan are a spring and a reservoir which are considered sacred, and it is thought that the saffron seed came from this spring. When the cultivation begins, they worship at this fount and pour cow's milk into it. If as it falls it sinks into the water, it is accounted a good omen and the saffron crop will be plentiful, but if it floats on the surface, it will be otherwise.
In the village of Khríu 360 springs refresh the eye and each of these is accounted a means of divine worship. Near this is an iron mine.
Maru Aḍwin adjoins Great Tibet where the Handú is found of the best breed and large in size, and carries heavy burdens. Near this is a hill called Chatar Kót on the summit of which snakes are so numerous that no one can approach it. There is also a high hill difficult of ascent, on which1 is a large lake. It is not every one that can find his way to it, for it often disappears from sight. At the foot of the mountain in different places images of Mahádeva fashioned of a stone like crystal are found and are a source of wonder.
In the neighbourhood of Achh Dal, one of the dependencies of Khaṭṭár is a fountain which shoots up to the height of a cubit, and is scarce equalled for its coldness, limpidity and refreshing qualities. The sick that drink of it and persevere in a course of its waters, recover their health.
In the village of Kotihár2 is a deep spring, surrounded by stone temples. When its water decreases, an image of Mahádeva in sandal-wood appears. The quality of this spring does not alter.
In the vicinity of Wular is a lofty mountain, containing a salt spring. The Kashmír stag3 is here found in numbers.
Matan4 stands upon a hill and once possessed a large temple. There is a small pool on the summit, the water of which never decreases. Some suppose this to be the Well of Babylon, but at the present day there is no trace of anything but an ordinary pit.
On the slope of the hill is a spring, at the head of which a reservoir has been constructed, full of fish. The sanctity of the place preserves them from being touched. By the side of it is a cave, the depth of which cannot be ascertained.
In Kháwarpárah is a source, whose waters tumble headlong with a mighty roar.
In the village of Aish1 is the cell of Bábá Zainu'ddín Ríshi. It is in the side of a hill. It is said that in ancient times the hill held no water, but when he took up his abode there, a spring began to flow. For twelve years he occupied this cell and at length closed its mouth with a large stone and never went forth again, and none has ever found trace of him.
The town of Dachchhinpárah2 is on the side of a mountain bordering Great Tibet and is fed by the waters of the above-mentioned spring. Between Great Tibet and the above-mentioned parganah is a cave in which is an image in ice called Amar Nát. It is considered a shrine of great sanctity. When the new moon rises from her throne of rays, a bubble as it were of ice is formed in the cave which daily increases little by little for fifteen days till it is somewhat higher than two yards, of the measure of the yard determined by His Majesty; with the waning moon, the image likewise begins to decrease, till no trace of it remains when the moon disappears. They believe it to be the image of Mahádeva and regard it as a means (through supplication) of the fulfilment of their desires. Near the cave is a rill called Amráoti, the clay of which is extremely white. They account it auspicious and smear themselves with it. The snows of this mountainous tract nowhere melt, and from the extreme cold, the straitness of the defiles and the rough inequalities of the road, they are surmounted with great toil.
In the village of Dákhámún is a spring, and whenever its water boils up and becomes turbid its surface is covered with particles of straw and rubbish, the dust of dissension arises in the country. A quarry of Solomon's stone1 is in the vicinity of which utensils are fashioned.
About the parganah of Phák grow a variety of herbs and plants. Adjoining is a large lake called Dal. One side of it is contiguous to the city and on its surface a number of floating islands2 are constructed which are cultivated, and fraudulent people will at times cut off a piece and carry it away to a different position. Sulṭán Zainu'l Aábidín constructed in this lake a causeway (sad) of clay and stone one kós in length from the city to this parganah. In the vicinity also is a spring of which the sick drink and are restored to health.
In the village of Thíd,1 is a delightful spot where seven springs unite: around them are stone buildings, memorials of bygone times. There is also a source which in winter is warm and in summer cold.
In the village of Bázwál is a waterfall from the crest of Sháhkót. It is called Shálahmár. Here fish are caught in numbers. A streamlet is caged at two ends and when the water is carried off, the fish between are taken.
In Ishibári2 is a spring held sacred by the people of Hindustán, called Suryasar, surrounded by stone temples. Shakarnág is a spring which is dry all the year, but should the 9th of any month happen to fall on a Friday, it bubbles up and flows from morn till eve, and people flock to partake of its blessings.
In the village of Rambal3 are a spring and a pool. Those who have special needs throw in a nut, if it floats, it is an augury of success; if it sinks, it is considered adverse.
In Bánihal is a temple dedicated to Durgah. If any one desires to learn the issue of a strife between himself and his enemy, he fills two vessels with boiled rice, the one representing his own fortunes, the other those of his foe, and places them in the temple and closes the doors. On the following day the devotees present themselves to learn the result. In whose vessel roses and saffron are found, his undertaking will prosper, and that which is full of straws and dirt, portends the ruin of the person it represents. Stranger still, in a dispute where it is difficult to discover the truth, each party is given a fowl or a goat and sent to the temple. They then poison each of these animals and severally rub them with their hands. His animal whose cause is just recovers, and the other dies.
In the Vér tract of country is the source of the Bihat. It is a pool measuring a jaríb which tosses in foam with an astonishing roar, and its depth is unfathomable. It goes by the name of Vernág4 and is surrounded by a stone embankment and to its east are temples of stone. In the village of Ḳambar is a spring callcd Bawan Sendh5 which during two months of the spring-time is in agitation. It is always full and its water never decreases.
In Devsar in the village of Balau is a pool called Balau Nág 20 yards square in which the water is agitated: it is embosomed in delightful verdure and canopied by shady trees. Whosoever is desirous of knowing the prospects of the harvest, or whether his own circumstances are to be prosperous or unfavourable, fills an earthen vessel with rice, writes his name on its rim, and closing its mouth, casts it into the spring. After a time the vessel of its own accord floats on the surface, and he then opens it and if the rice be fragrant and warm, the year will be prosperous and his undertakings successful, but if it be filled with clay or mud and rubbish, the reverse will be the case.1
Veshau2 is the name of a stream which issues picturesquely from an orifice in a mountain, and at the same place is a declivity down which the waters tumble from a height of 20 yards with a thundering roar. Hindu devotees throw themselves down from its summit and with the utmost fortitude sacrifice their lives, in the belief that it is a means of securing their spiritual welfare.
Kuthár3 is a spring which remains dry for eleven years, and when the planet Jupiter enters the sign of Leo, it flows on the following Thursday and during the succeeding seven days is again dry and once more fills on the Thursday next following, and so continues for a year.
In the village of Matalhámah is a wood in which is a heronry,4 the feathers are taken for plumes, and the birds are here regularly fed.
Near Shukroh5 is a low hill on the summit of which is a fountain which flows throughout the year and is a place of pilgrimage for the devout. The snow does not fall on this spur.
In Nágám is a spring called Nílah Nág,1 the basin of which measures 40 bigahs. Its waters are exquisitely clear and it is considered a sacred spot, and many voluntarily perish by fire about its border. Strange to relate omens are taken by its means. A nut is divided into four parts and thrown in, and if an odd number floats, the angury is favourable, if otherwise, the reverse. In the same way if milk (thrown in) sinks, it is a good omen, and if not, it is unpropitious. In ancient times a volume, which they call Nilmat, arose from its depths, which contained a detailed description of Kashmír and the history and particulars of its temples. They say that a flourishing city with lofty buildings is underneath its waters, and that in the time of Badu Sháh,2 a Bráhman descended into it and returned after three days, bringing back some of its rarities and narrated his experiences.
In the village of Bíruwá is a spring and in its water lepers bathe early on the first day of the week and are restored to health. In the vicinity is a plateau, a pasture ground for cattle, the grass of which has peculiar fattening properties.
In the village of Halthal of the parganah of I´tchh is found a quivering tree.3 If the smallest branch of it be shaken, the whole tree becomes tremulous.
Lár borders on the mountains of Great Tibet. To its north is a lofty mountain which dominates all the surrounding country, and the ascent of which is arduous. At its foot are two springs, two yards distant from each other, the waters of one being extremely cold and those of the other exceedingly hot. They are considered sacred and the bones of bodies are here reduced to ashes: the bones and ashes of the dead are cast into a large lake on the mountain and this ceremony is regarded as a means of union with the Divinity. If the flesh of an animal fall into it, a heavy fall of snow and rain ensues. The river called Sind which rises in Tibet, is wholesome to drink, and is so clear that the fish in it are visible. They strike them with iron spears and catch them also in other ways. Shahábu'ddínpúr is on the banks of the Bihat, and about it are large plane trees which is a favourite resort. The Sind joins the Bihat at this point.
In Tulmúlá is an area of about 100 bíghas in extent which is flooded during the rains, and remains somewhat moist even after the waters have dried up. The people plunge in sticks of a yard in length, more or less, and work them about, and thrusting their hands into the holes pull out fish of four pounds weight and more, but commonly of small size.
In Satpúr is a pool, the depth of which cannot be fathomed. It is held in great veneration and is a place of worship. Bhutesar is a temple dedicated to Mahádeva. Whoever approaches to pay his devotions, hears the sounds of ceremonial worship and no one can tell whence they proceed.
In Khoiháma which adjoins Little Tibet is a large lake called the Wular twenty-eight kós in circumference. The Bihat flows into it and its course is somewhat lost to the eye.1 Here Sulṭán Zainu'l Aábidín built a large palace called Zain Lanka. Boats full of stones and branches of trees are sunk in the lake and pulled up by ropes after the lapse of three or four months, and many fish are taken that have homed there. The capture of water-fowl here affords considerable sport, and in the village of Ajas,2 stags are chased down to the lake and taken. Near Máchhámú is an island covered with trees which when shaken by the wind, cause the island also to quake.
Saffron is also cultivated in Paraspúr. It formerly held a lofty temple which when destroyed by Sikandar father of Sulṭán Zainu'l Aábidín, a copper tablet was discovered on which was inscribed in Sanskrit, that after the lapse of eleven hundred years, one Sikandar, would destroy it and gather for himself exceeding great chastisement.3
In the Parganah of Kamráj1 at the village of Trahgám the residence of the Chaks is a fountain of sweet water called Chatarnág and in the middle is a stone building of great age. The fish grow to great size but whosoever touches them, is afflicted by some calamity.
Near Kargón is a defile called Sóyam2 where an area of ten jaríbs of land becomes so hot at the time of the conjunction of Jupiter and Leo that trees are burnt up and a vessel of water if left on the ground will boil. A flourishing little town stands here. From Kamráj is a defile, one end of which touches Káshghar and on the west lies Pakli, where gold is obtained in the following manner. The skins of long-haired goats are spread in the fords of the river, with stones placed round them that the current may not bear them away. They are taken up after three days and left in the sun. When dry, they are shaken, yielding their three tolahs weight of gold dust. Gilgit is the name of another pass which leads to Káshghar. Gold is there obtained by soil washings.
At two days' distance from Háehámún is the river named Padmati which flows from the Dárdu3 country. Gold is also found in this river. On its banks is a stone temple called ´Sárada1 dedicated to Durgá, and regarded with great veneration. On every eighth tithi of Shuklapachch,2 it begins to shake and produces the most extraordinary effect.
The system of revenue collection is by appraisement and division of crops, assessments for crops paying special rates and cash transactions not being the custom of the country. Some part of the ´Sair Jihát3 cesses, however, are taken in cash. Payments in coin and kind were estimated in kharwárs of (Sháli) rice. Although one-third4 had been for a long time past the nominal share of the State, more than two shares was actually taken but through His Majesty's justice, it has been reduced to one half. According to the assessment of Ḳázi5 (Ali) the revenue was fixed at 30 lakhs, 63,050 kharwárs, 11 taraks, each kharwár being 3 man, 8 sérs Akbarsháhi. A weight of two dáms is called a pal, and ½ and ¼ of this weight are also in use.
Seven and a half pals are considered equivalent to one sér, two sérs
are equal to half a man, and four sérs to a tarak, and sixteen taraks to one
kharwár. A tarak, according to the royal weights (of Akbar) is eight sérs.
Taking the prices current for several years, the Ḳázi struck an average of
the aggregate, and the kharwár (in kind) was ascertained to be 29 dáms,
and the kharwár in money, was fixed according to the former rate of 13
In the revenue returns forwarded by Ḳázi Ali to the Imperial Exchequer, forty-one parganahs are taken while the return submitted by A´saf Khán contains but thirty-eight, there being but thirty-eight in point of fact. For Ḳázi Ali on a review of the question separated the two villages Karná and Dárdu, of the parganah of Kamráj, and dividing the parganah of Sáir i Mawázi into two, constituted these into two parganahs. In former times certain selected towns of each parganah were denominated Sáiru'l Mawázi (village-group) and were held as Kháliṣah.4 Ḳázi Ali united forty villages of the Marráj1 side under the name of Parganahi Háveli and retained eighty-eight2 villages of Kamráj according to the for mer distribution, as parganah of Sáiru'l Mawázi.
The whole kingdom was divided under its ancient rulers into two divisions, Marráj on the east, and Kamráj on the west.
At the present day that a great part of the army in Kashmír has been withdrawn, the local militia consists of 4,892 cavalry and 92,400 infantry.
Containing 38 Mahals. Revenue 3,011,618 kharwárs, 12 taraks, being equivalent to 62,113,040½ dáms. (Rs. 1,552,826); out of which 9,435,006 kharwárs, 14 taraks is paid in money, equivalent to 12,501,880 dáms. (Rs. 312,547.) Castes, various. Cavalry, 3,202. Infantry, 27,725.
Containing 22 Mahals. Revenue 1,792,819 kharwárs, equivalent to 35,796,122½ dáms, (Rs. 894,903), of which 670,551 kharwárs, 12 taraks are paid in money, equivalent to 8,885,248 dáms, (Rs. 222,131-3-2). Cavalry, 1,620. Infantry, 4,600.
City of ´Srinagar. Revenue 342,694 kharwárs, 12 taraks, in money, 342,996 kharwárs, 8 taraks; in kind, 1,698 kharwárs, 4 taraks.
| In kind. | In money. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Kharwárs. | Taraks. | Kharwárs. | Taraks. | ||||
| I´tchh, | 144,102 | 0 | 62,034 | 4 | 5 | 50 | |
| Brang, | 78,834 | 4 | 8,769 | 8 | 68 | 1000 | Khamash3 and Zinah. |
| Vihi, | 209,632 | 8 | 161,968 | 8 | 12 | 400 | Bat,4 i. e., Bráhman. |
| In kind. | In money. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Kharwárs. | Taraks. | Kharwárs. | Taraks. | ||||
| Wular, | 128,656 | 4 | 12,605 | 8 | 20 | 200 | Dardah and Shál. |
| Phák, | 7,1111 | 12 | 17,402 | 8 | . | . | |
| Dachhinpárah, | 75,153 | 0 | 6,902 | 12 | 20 | 100 | Khán.1 |
| Kháwarpárah, | 45,226 | 8 | 3,575 | 8 | 100 | 500 | Kháwar.2 |
| Khaṭṭár, | 37,479 | 4 | 3,221 | 12 | 15 | 300 | Dard. |
| Maru Aḍwin (Maru Wardwún, Vigne), | . | 5,041 | 0 | 200 | 200 | ||
| half bowmen | |||||||
| Matan, | 190,43⅓ | 18,62½ | 20 | 100 | Bat. | ||
| In kind. | In money. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Kharwárs. | Taraks. | Kharwárs. | Taraks. | ||||
| A´ḍwin, | 101,432 | 4 | 14,815 | 163 | 1 | 100 | Dard. |
| I´tchh, | 98,369 | 0 | 14,377 | 4 | 6 | 30 | Bráhman. |
| Banihál, | 6,435 | . | 400 | 4000 | Síhar. | ||
| 40 horseloads4 | |||||||
| Báṭú, | 3,515 | 0 | 4,235 | 8 | 50 | 300 | Náik.5 |
| besides transit duties remitted. | |||||||
| Dévsar, | 85,644 | 8 | 822 | 8 | 300 | 6 000 | Zínah.7 |
| Zínahpúr, | 15,875 | 4 | 1,790 | 1 | 20 | . | |
| Sóparsaman,8 | 6,133 besides dues on firewood. | 2,003 | 4 | 70 | 200 | Kambah. | |
| Shádarah, | 39,167 | 0 | 8,550 | 12 | . | . | Thakar.9 |
| Shukróh, | 45,224 | 0 | 12,757 | 8 | 20 | . | Ashwár. |
| Nágám, | 189,770 | 12 | 22,576 | 4 | 15 | 100 | Bat. |
| Vér, | 12,270 | 8 | 838 | 500 | 5000 | Sahsah.1 | |
Containing 16 Mahals. Revenue 1,218,799 kharwárs, 12 taraks, equivalent to 26,316,918 dáms. (Rs. 657,922-15-2.) In money, 272,954½ kharwárs, equivalent to 3,616,632 dáms. (Rs. 90,415-12-9.) Cavalry, 1,590. Infantry, 16,965.
| In kind. | In money. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Kharwárs. | Taraks. | Kharwárs. | Taraks. | ||||
| Zínahkar, | 13,253 | 0 | 32,55½ | 0 | 50 | 100 | Bat, Musalmán. |
| Khoiháma, | 83,670 | 12 | 15,522 | 0 | 50 | 1000 | Zínah.2 |
| In kind. | In money. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |||
| Kharwárs. | Taraks. | Kharwárs. | Taraks. | ||||
| Indarkól, | 9,553 | 4 | 7,238 | 0 | . | . | Bat. |
| Paraspúr, | 18,830 | 12 | 3,352 | 8 | . | . | Síyáhi. |
| Patan, | 4,799 | 4 | 523 | 0 | 30 | 110 | Bhat, Musulmán. |
| Bánkal, | 115,233 | 12 | 20,280 | 4 | 200 | 500 | Bákri.1 |
| Barwi, | 57,098 | 12 | 13,383 | 0 | 35 | 30 | Kháo.2 |
| Telkám, | 15,415 | 12 | 4,435 | 4 | . | 30 | Pandit. |
| Dínsú,3 | 53,219½ | 17,038½ | 150 | 400 | Dóni. | ||
| Dachhin Kháwarah, | 36,222 | 4 | 20,653 | 0 | 25 | 300 | Khasi, Kanku,4 Zínah. |
| Sáir u'l Mawázi, | 192,641 | 4 | 18,553 | 12 | . | . | |
| Khói, | 12,945 | 0 | 370 | . | 15 | Rawér. | |
| Kamráj, | 342,844 | 4 | 103,725 | 4 | 1000 | 10,000 | Chak. |
| Karóhan,5 | 115,474 | 0 | 29,779 | 12 | . | 110 | |
Fifty-three princes reigned during a period of 1266 years.
I.
Ugnand.
Damódar,his sons.
Bál,
Thirty-five princes succeeded whose names are unknown.6
Lavah, (var. Lava.)
Kishen, his son (var. Kish.)
Kahgandra, his son.
Surandra, his son.
Godhara, of another tribe.
Súran, his son.
Janaka, his son.
Shachinar, (var. Hashka, Bíshka).
Asóka, son of Janaka's paternal uncle.
Jalóka, his son.
Damódar, descendant of Asóka.
Hashka,three brothers. Buddhists.
Zashka.
Kaniska,
Abhiman.
| Y. | M. | D. | ||
| Rájá | Ganand (Gonerda III) reigned, | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Bhíkan (Vibhishana,) his son, | 53 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Indrajíta, his son, | 35 | 6 | 0 |
| ” | Ráwana, his son, | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Bhíkan II, his son, | 35 | 6 | 0 |
| ” | Nara, (also called Khar), his son, | 39 | 9 | 0 |
| ” | Sidha, his son, | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Utpaláchah, his son, | 30 | 6 | 0 |
| ” | Hiranya, his son, | 37 | 7 | 0 |
| ” | Hirankal, his son, | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Abaskaha, his son, | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Mihirkal, his son, | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Baka (Vaka), his son, | 63 | 0 | 13 |
| ” | Khatnanda, his son, | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Vasunanda, his son, | 52 | 2 | 0 |
| ” | Nara, his son, | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Aja, (Aksha), his son, | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| ” | Gopáditya, his son, (MSS. Kópárat), | 60 | 0 | 6 |
| ” | Karan, his son, | 57 | 0 | 11 |
| ” | Narendraditya, his son, | 36 | 3 | 10 |
| ” | Yudisht'hira, his son, | 48 | 0 | 10 |
| Y. | M. | D. | |
| Six princes reigned 192 years. | |||
| Pratapáditya, said to be a descendant of Vikramáditya, | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalóka, his son, | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Tanjír, (Tanjína) his son, (T. Tanzar G. and var Banjír), | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Bijai, relation of above, | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Jayandra, (var. Chandra), his son, | 37 | 0 | 0 |
| A´rya Ráj, | 47 | 0 | 0 |
Ten princes reigned 592 years, 2 months, 1 day.
| Meghaváhana, a descendant of Judisht'hira, | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| Srishtaséna, his son, | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Hiran, his son, | 30 | 2 | 0 |
| Mátrigupta, Bráhman, | 4 | 9 | 1 |
| Pravaraséna, a descendant of Méghaváhana, | 63 | 0 | 0 |
| Judisht'hira, his son, | 39 | 3 | 0 |
| Lakshman, called also Nandradit, | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Ranáditya, his younger brother, | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Vikramáditya, his son, | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| Báláditya, his younger brother, no issue, | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Y. | M. | D. | |
| Durlabhavardan, son-in-law of Báládit, | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Pratapáditya, grandson of his daughter, | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Chandrapíṛa,1 his eldest son, | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Tárápíṛa, his brother, | 4 | 0 | 24 |
| Lalitáditya, another brother, | 36 | 7 | 11 |
| Kavalayápíṛá, his son, | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Vajráditya, his brother, | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Prithivyápíṛá, his son, | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Sangrápíṛá, grandson of Lalitáditya by a son, | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Jayápíṛa ditto, | 31 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaj, his brother-in-law, | some months. | ||
| Lalitápíṛa, his son, | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Sangrámapíṛa, his brother, | 37 | 0 | 0 |
| Brihaspati, son of Lalitápíṛa, | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Ajitápía, or Ajayápíṛa, son of Prabhubápíṛa, | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Anangápíṛa, son of Sangrámápíṛa, | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Utpalápíṛa, son of Ajayápíṛa. | |||
Fifteen princes reigned 89 years, 1 month, 15 days.
| Y. | M. | D. | |
| Avanti Varmá, of the Chamár easte, | 28 | 3 | 3 |
| ´Sankar Varmá, his son, | 18 | 7 | 19 |
| Gopál Varmá, | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sankat, said to be his brother, | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Sugandhá Ráni, mother of above-mentioned Gopál, | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Párthá, son of Nárjit Varmá, son of Sukh Varmá, | 15 | 0 | 10 |
| Nárjit Varmá, son of Sukh Varmá, his brother, | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Chakra Varmá, | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Súra Varmá, his brother, | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Párthá, son of Nárjit, | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Chakra Varmá, second time, | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Sankar Vardhana, son of Mir Vardhana, | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Chakra Varmá, third time, | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unmatti Avanti Varmá, son of Rájá Párthá, | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Surma (´Sura) Varmá, second time, last of the Chamár princes, | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Ten princes reigned 64 years, 3 months, 14 days.
| Jasasra (Jasaskar) Dev, a peasant, | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Búranit, an uncle's descendant, | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sangráma Deva, son of Jasaskar, | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Parva Gupta, one of his subjects, | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Khema (Kshéma) Gupta, | 8 | 6 | 0 |
| Abhiman, his son, | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Nanda Gupta, his son, | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Tribhúvana, | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Bhímá Gupta, son of Abhiman, | 4 | 3 | 20 |
| Didá Ráni, mother of Abhiman, | 23 | 6 | 0 |
| Twenty-seven princes reigned 351 years, 6 months, 17 days. | |||
| Sangráma, son of Adiráj, nephew of the Ráni, | 24 | 2 | 0 |
| Harirájá, his son, | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| A´nanta, his son, | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Kalasa Déva, his son, | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Utkarśá, his son, | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| Haraś, son of Kalasa, | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Uchal, grandfather of Haraś, | 10 | 4 | 2 |
| Riddha, son of Siddha, one of the murderers of Uchal. | one night and 3 hours. | ||
| Salhan, brother of Uchal, | 0 | 3 | 27 |
| Susalha, brother of Salhan, | 7 | 10 | 0 |
| Bhekhyájar, son of Haraś, | 0 | 6 | 12 |
| Rájá Susalha, second time, | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Jaya Singh, son of Susalha, | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Parmának, son of above | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| Dati (var. and G. Danji Déva), his son, | 9 | 4 | 17 |
| Jas Déva, his younger brother, | 18 | 0 | 13 |
| Chag (Jag) Déva, son of above, | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Rájá Déva, his son, | 23 | 3 | 7 |
| Sangráma Déva, his son, | 16 | 0 | 10 |
| Ráma Déva, his son, | 21 | 1 | 13 |
| Lachhman (Lakshman) Déva, son of a Bráhman, | 13 | 3 | 12 |
| Sínha Déva, chief of Labdar of Daskhinpárah, | 14 | 5 | 27 |
| Sínha Déva, brother of above, | 19 | 3 | 26 |
| Rinjan of Tibet, a native of that country, | 10 | some | |
| months. | |||
| Adin Déva, relation of Sínha Déva, | 15 | 2 | 10 |
| Ráni Kotá Dévi, wife of Adin Déva, | 0 | 6 | 15 |
| A. H. | A. D. | Y. | M. | D. | |
| 715 | 1315 | Sulṭán Shamsu'ddín, minister of Sínha Déva, | 2 | 11 | 25 |
| 750 | 1349 | ” Jamshíd, his son, | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| 752 | 1351 | ” Aláu'ddín, son of Shamsu'ddín, | 12 | 18 | 13 |
| 765 | 1363 | ” Shahábu'ddín, | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 785 | 1386 | ” Ḳuṭbu'ddín, son of Ḥasanu'ddín, | 15 | 5 | 2 |
| 7991 | 1396 | ” Sikandar, his son whose name was Sankár, | 22 | 9 | 6 |
| 819 | 1416 | ” Ali Sháh, his son, | 6 | 9 | 0 |
| 826 | 1422 | ” Zainu'l Aábidín, younger brother of Ali Sháh, | 52 | 0 | 0 |
| 877 | 1472 | ” Ḥáji Haidar Sháh, his son, | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 878 | 1473 | ” Ḥasan Khán,2 his son, | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| 891 | 1486 | ” Muḥammad Sháh, his son, | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| 9023 | 1496 | ” Fatḥ Sháh, son of A´dam Khán, son of Sulṭán Zainu'l Aábidín, | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| 911 | 1505 | ” Muḥammad Sháh, a second time, | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| ” Fatḥ Sháh, a second time, | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| ” Muḥammad Sháh, a third time, | 11 | 11 | 11 | ||
| ” Ibrahím, his son, | 0 | 8 | 25 | ||
| 942 | 1535 | ” Názuk Sháh, son of Fatḥ Sháh, (Ferishta, “son of Ibrahím, son of Muḥammad Sháh),” | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ” Muḥammad Sháh,4 a fourth time, | 34 | 8 | 10 | ||
| ” Shamsi, son of Muḥammad Sháh, | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
| ” Ismạíl Sháh, his brother, | 2 | 9 | 0 | ||
| Sulṭán Názuk Sháh, a second time, | 13 | 9 | 0 | ||
| ” Ismạíl Sháh, a second time, | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 948 | 1541 | Mirzá Haidar Gurgán, | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Sulṭán Názuk Sháh, a third time, | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Gházi Khán, son of Káji Chak, | 10 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 971 | 1563 | Husain Chak, his brother, | 6 | 10 | 0 |
| Ali Chak, brother of Husain Chak, | 8 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 986 | 1578 | Yusuf Sháh, his son, | 1 | 0 | 20 |
| Sayyid Mubárak Sháh, one of his nobles, | 0 | 1 | 25 | ||
| Lohar Chak, son of Sikandar, son of Káji Chak, | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Yusuf Sháh, a second time, | 5 | 3 | 0 | ||
| Yáḳúb Khán, his son, | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Thus this series of 191 princes, reigning throughout a period of 4,109 years, 11 months and 9 days, passed away.
When the Imperial standards were for the first time borne aloft in this garden of perpetual spring, a book called Ráj Tarangini written in the Sanskrit tongue containing an account of the princes of Kashmír during a period of some four thousand years, was presented to His Majesty. It had been the custom in that country for its rulers to employ certain learned men in writing its annals. His Majesty who was desirous of extending the bounds of knowledge appointed capable interpreters in its translation which in a short time was happily accomplished. In this work it is stated that the whole of this mountainous region was submerged under water and called Sati Sar. Sati is the name of the wife of Mahádeva, and Sar signifies a lake. One day of Brahmá comprises 14 manvantaras.1 Up to the 40th year of the Divine Era, of the seventh manvantara, at which time Kashmír began to be inhabited, 27 (kalpas) each of four cycles (yug) as before mentioned,1 have elapsed and of the twenty-eighth three cycles, and of the fourth cycle 4,701 solar years. And when, according to the legend which they relate, the waters had somewhat subsided, Kasyapa who is regarded as one of the most sublime amongst ascetics, brought in the Bráhmans to inhabit the new region.2 When men began to multiply they sought to have a just ruler over them, and experienced elders, solicitous of the public weal met together in council and elected to the supreme authority one who was distinguished for his wisdom, his large understanding, his comprehensive benevolence and his personal courage. From this period dates the origin of their monarchical government which proceeded thus to the time of Ugnand 4,044 years prior to this the 40th year of the Divine Era.3 Ugnand fell by the hand of Balbhadra, the elder brother of Kishan in the battle fought at Mathura betwean Kishan and Jarasandha rájá of Behár. Damódara (his son), to revenge his death marched against some of the relations of Kishan who were hastening to a marriage festival in Ḳandahár, and was killed fighting on the banks of the Sind. His wife being then pregnant and the astrologers foretelling that it would prove a son, Kishan bestowed on him the government of the province. Thirty-five princes succeeded, but through their tyranny their names are no more remembered. When Lavah ascended the throne, justice was universally administered and deeds met their just recognition. He founded in Kámraj the great city of Lavapúr the ruins of which are still to be traced It is said to have held 800,000,000 houses. As the sage4 of Ganjah well says:
House linked to house fnom Ispahan to Rai
Like jointed canes, I've heard, stretch countlessly,
So that a cat might trace the distant span
From roof to roof twixt Rai and Ispahan;
But if the tale my credit doth belie,
The teller is its surety, faith not I.
When the succession devoled on Asoka the son of Janaka's paternal uncle, he abolished the Brahminical religion and established the Jain faith.1 His personal virtues adorned his reign, and his son Rájá Jalóka was distinguished for his justice, and his conquests were limited only by the ocean. On his return from Kanauj, then the capital of Hindustán, he brought with him a number of learned and enlightened men and of these his sagacity and perception of worth selected seven individuals. To one of them he entrusted the administration of justice; to another the revenue department; to a third the finances; to a fourth the superintendence of the troops; the fifth took charge of the department of commerce; the sixth controlled the material resources of the state, and the seventh interpreted the mysteries of the stars. He had also a knowledge of alchemy. It is said that a huge serpent ministered to his commands, mounted upon which be could descend below water for a long space. Sometimes he appeared as an old man, and at other times, as a youth, and marvellous tales are related of him. Buddhism became prevalent about this time.
Damodar (II) is said by some to have been one of the descendants of Asoka. He was a pious devout prince but was transformed into a snake through the curse of an ascetic. In the reign of Rájá Nara the Bráhmans prevailed over the Buddhists and levelled their temples to the ground. Rájá Mihirkal was a shameless tyrant, but by the strange freaks of fortune he made extensive conquests. As he was once returning homewards by the pass of Hastibhanj, an elephant lost its footing, and its screams and manner of falling caused him such amusement that he ordered a hundred elephants to be precipitated in a similar manner. From this circumstance the pass received its name hasti signifying elephant, and bhanj,1 injury. During his reign, a large rock blocked up the ferry of a river, and, however much it was cut away, it yet increased again during the night to its ordinary dimensions. Remedies were proposed in vain. At length a voice came forth intimating that if touched by the hand of a chaste woman, the rock would displace itself. Time after time it was touched by women in succession, and when no effect was produced, he ordered the women to be put to death for incontinence, the children for bastardy, and the husbands for consenting to the evil, until three krórs of human beings were massacred. The miracle was at length effected by the hand of a chaste woman, a potter by trade and caused great wonder. The Rájá being afflicted by various diseases, burnt himself to death.
Rájá Gopadit possessed considerable learning and his justice increased the extent of his sway. The slaughtering of animals was forbidden throughout his dominions and high and low abstained from eating flesh. The temple which now stands on Solomon's Hill was built by his minister.
Rájá Judishthira in the beginning of his rule administered the state with an impartial hand, but in a short space through his licentious conduct and intimacy with base associates, his subjects became extranged from him, and the kings of Hindustán and Tibet were arrayed against him. The chiefs of Kashmír threw him into prison.
During the reign of Rájá Tanjir (Banjír) snow fell when the sun was in Leo (July, August). The crops were destroyed and a terrible famine threw the country into disorder.
Rájá Jayandra possessed a minister wise, loyal and virtuous, and void of levity and dissimulation. His equals bore him envy and the wicked at heart but specious in appearance sought his ruin and undermined his influence by underhand misrepresentations. As princes are on these occasions apt to err and do not investigate closely, forgetful of former experiences of what envy can effect, the minister was overthrown, and banished in disgrace. His strange destiny, however, did not deprive him of his composure. He allowed not grief to encompass him, but gladdened his days with cheerfulness of heart. His wicked enemies represented him as aiming at the throne, and the Rájá, ignorant of the real facts, ordered him to be impaled. After some time had elapsed, his spiritual preceptor happened to pass that way and read on the frontal bone of his skull that he was destined to disgrace and imprisonment and to be impaled, but that he should again come to life and obtain the sovereignty. Amazed at learning this, he took down the body and secretly kept it and continued in supplication to the Almighty. One night the spirits gathered round and by their incantations restored the corpse to life. In a short time he succeeded to the throne, but his experience of life soon induced him to withdraw into retirement.
Megaváhan was renowned for his virtues and gave peace and security to Hindustán as far as the borders of the ocean. After the death of Rájá Hiran without issue, the chiefs of Kashmír paid allegiance to Rájá Bikramájít the ruler of Hindustán. Rájá Matrigupta was a learned Kashmíri Bráhman. Bikramájít profited by his wisdom but did not advance his temporal interests. He, however, gave him a sealed letter to convey to Kashmír and furnishing him with a small sum of money for his expenses as he started, despatched him on his mission. The Bráhman set out with a heavy heart. On his arrival in Kashmír, the letter was opened. It ran thus. ‘The bearer has rendered important services at my Court and has experienced many reverses of fortune. On the receipt of this letter, let the government of the country be entrusted to him, and be this mandate obeyed under fear of the royal displeasure.’ The chiefs met in council and yielded their submission.
Rájá Pravaraséna had withdrawn from the country and lived in retirement in Hindustán. A devout and enlightened servant of God predicted to him the good tidings of his future elevation to a throne. On the faith of this, he went to Nagarkóṭ and possessed himself of that place. On hearing of the death of Bikramájít, Matrigupta abdicated and setting out for Benares lived in seclusion. Pravaraséna was universally distinguished for his justice and liberality. He founded Srinagar1 the capital of the country and rendered it populous during his reign with 600,000 houses. With surpassing munificence he sent to Mátrigupta the aggregate of eleven years' revenue of Kashmír which that personage bestowed upon the indigent. Rájá Ranáditya was a just prince and made many conquests. In the neighbourhood of Kishtawár near the river Chenáb, he entered a cave with all his family and many of his courtiers, and was seen no more; many strange legends are related regarding him. Rájá Báláditya invaded Hindustán and extended his dominions to the borders of the sea.
In the reign of Rájá Chandrapíṛa the wife of a Bráhman appeared to him claiming justice, saying, that her husband had been killed and the murderer was undiscovered. He asked her if she suspected any one, to which she replied that her husband was of an amiable disposition and had no enemy, but that he often had disputations on points of philosophy with a certain person. This man was brought up but strenuously denied the accusation, and the complainant would not accept an ordeal by fire or water lest the man should employ some supernatural means of escaping it. The Rájá in his perplexity could neither eat nor sleep. An enlightened sage appearing to him in a vision taught him an incantation to be uttered over rice meal scattered about, upon which the suspected person was to walk. If the footsteps of two people were observed as he passed over it, he was not to be suffered to escape. Through this suggestion the truth was discovered and punishment duly meted out. But as a Bráhman could not be put to death, an iron image of a man without a head was made and his forehead branded therewith.
Rájá Lalitáditya devoted himself to the prosperity of his kingdom and in the strength of the divine aid overran Irán, Turán, Fárs, Hindustán, Khaṭa, and the whole habitable globe, and administered his dominions with justice. He died in the mountains of the north, and it is said that he was turned into stone by the curse of an ascetic, but others relate the story differently.
Rájá Jayápíṛa reached a lofty pitch of glory and his conquests were extensive. Ninety-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine horses were bestowed by him in charity at Benares, and his gifts to the poor were on the same munificent scale. He asked of the elders whether the army of his grandfather Lalitáditya or his own were the larger. They answered that his contained but 80,000 litters, whereas 125,000 of such conveyances were arrayed under his grandfather's standard, by which proportion he might judge of the numerical strength of his other retinue. When he had proceeded some distance on his march of conquest, his brother-in-law, Jajja, who was in Kashmír disputed the throne. The nobles of the king, in anxious fear for their wives and children, betrayed him and preferred their outward reputation before their true honour. The Rájá hastened alone to Bengal, and with the aid of troops from that country, repossessed himself of his kingdom, Jajja being slain in battle.
Rájá Lalitápíṛa took low companions into favour and associated with buffoons, and his wise councillors withdrew from the court. His minister finding remonstrance of no avail, retired from office.
Rájá Sankar Varmá conquered Gujarát and Sind, and overran the Deccan, but left it in the possession of its ruler. Although in the beginning of his reign he followed a virtuous course, he lacked perseverance. The intoxication of worldly prosperity plunged him into every vice.
During the reign of Rájá Jasaskardeva, a Bráhman lost a purse of a hundred gold mohurs. Under the impulse of violent grief he resolved to make away with himself. The thief hearing of this, asked him how much he would be satisfied to take, if he discovered the purse. The Bráhman answered, “Whatever you please.” The thief offered him ten mohurs. The Bráhman, sore at heart, appealed to the Rájá who inquired into the case, and sending for the thief ordered him to restore ninety mohurs, intending by this, that the amount the thief desired to keep for himself, should be the portion of the Bráhman.
In the reign of Sínhadeva, a Muḥammadan named Sháh Amir who traced his descent to Arjun the Pandava was in the royal service. About this time Dalju the chief commander under the king of Ḳandahár, attacked and plundered the kingdom. The Rájá took refuge in the mountain passes and levied forcible contributions on the people, and sent them to him and entreated him as a supplicant. The invader withdrew, dreading the severity of the weather, and many of his troops perished in the snow. About the same time also, Rinjan, the son of the ruler of Tibet invaded the country which was reduced to great distress. On the death of the Rájá, the sovereignty devolved on Rinjan who was distinguished for his munificence. He appointed Sháh Mír his minister whose religion, through intimacy and association with him, he eventually adopted.
When Rájá Adindeva died, the aforesaid Sháh Mír by specious flattery and intriguing, married his widow. In the year 742, A. H. (1341-2,
A. D.) he caused the khutbah to be read, and the coin to be minted in his own name and assumed the title of Shamsu'ddín and levied a tax of one-sixth on all imports into Kashmír. It had been revealed to him in a dream that he would obtain the sovereignty of the kingdom.1
Sulṭán Aláu'ddín issued an ordinance that an unchaste woman should not inherit of her husband.
Sulṭán Shahábu'ddín encouraged learning and proclaimed an equal administration of the laws. Nagarkót, Tibet and other places were overrun by him.
During the reign of Sulṭán Ḳutbu'ddín Mír Sayyid Ali Hamadáni arrived in Kashmír and was received with great favour.
Sulṭán Sikandar was a rigid follower of religious tradition and a bigot. He overthrew idolatrous shrines and persecuted people not of his faith. During his reign, Timúr invaded Hindustán and sent him two elephants. Sikandar desired to pay his homage to that conqueror, but on his road to the interview he learnt that it was reported in Tímúr's camp that the sovereign of Kashmír was bringing with him a present of a thousand horses. Concerned at the untruthfulness of this rumour he returned and sent his excuses.2 Ali Sháh appointed (his brother) Zainu'l Aábidín regent in his stead and set out for Ḥijáz. By the persuasion of foolish and evil advisers3 and through inconstancy of purpose, he returned with the view of recovering his authority in Kashmír and aided by the Rájá of Jammu he took possession of the kingdom. Zainu'l Aábidín set out for the Punjáb and joined Jasrat of the Khokhar1 tribe. Ali Sháh collecting a large army advanced into the Punjáb and a great battle took place in which Ali Sháh was defeated and fell into obscurity while Zainu'l Aábidín recovered the sovereignty of Kashmír. Jasrat leaving Kashmír advanced against Delhi but defeated by Sulṭán Bahlol Lodi retreated to Kashmír and with the assistance of an army from its monarch, conquered the Panjáb.
Zainu'l Aábidín overran Tibet and Sind. He was a wise prince, devoted to philosophical studies and it was his fortune to enjoy universal peace. He was regarded by high and low as a special servant of God and venerated as a saint. He was credited with the power of divesting himself of his corporeal form, and he foretold that under the dynasty of the Chaks, the sovereignty of Kashmír would be transferred from that family to the monarchs of Hindustán, which prediction after a period of years was ac-complished. His benevolence and love of his people induced him to abolish the capitation tax (levied on other than Muslims) and to prohibit the slaughtering of cows, as well as penalties and presents of all kinds. He added somewhat to the measure of the Jaríb. His private revenues were drawn from copper mines. He often personally administered medicinal remedies2 and resolved all difficult undertakings with ease. Robbers were employed in chained gangs on public works. His gentleness of disposition dissuaded men from the pursuit of game, and he himself eat no flesh meat. He caused many works to be translated from the Arabic, Persian, Kashmíri and Sanskrit languages. During his reign musicians from Persia and Turkestán flocked to his court; among them Mulla Ụúdi the immediate pupil of the famous Khwájah Abdu'l Ḳádir arrived from Khurásán, and Mulla Jamíl who in singing and painting was preeminent among his contemporaries. Sulṭán Abu Sạíd Mirzá sent him presents of Arab horses and dromedaries from Khurásán and Bahlol Lodi king of Delhi and Sulṭán Maḥmúd of Gujarát were in friendly alliance with him.
Sulṭán Ḥasan, collecting an army invaded the Punjáb and encountering Tátár1 Khán (Lodi) in several actions devastated the country.
In the reign of Fatḥ Sháh, Mír Shamsu'ddín one of the disciples of Sháh Ḳásim Anwár,2 came from Iráḳ and promulgated the Núr Bakshi doctrines, from which period date the dissensions between Sunnis and Shíạs in this country.
During the third reign of Muḥammad Sháh when he recovered the kingdom by the help of Sulṭán Sikandar (Lodi of Delhi), Báber invaded Hindustán.
During Sulṭán Ibrahím's domination, Abdúl Mákri3 represented to Sulṭán Báber that Kashmír might be conquered with little difficulty. Shaikh Ali Beg, Muḥammad Khán and Maḥmúd Khán were therefore despatched to that country and obtained some success but the intrigues of the people prevented a settlement and they returned with gifts and presents and Názuk Sháh succeeded to the government. Under the reign of Muḥammad Sháh for the fourth time, the emperor Humáyún ascended the throne of Delhi, and when Mirzá Kámrán1 was at Lahor, the officers formerly despatched to Kashmír (Ali Beg and Muḥammad Khán) persuaded him that Kashmír could be taken with little trouble. The Mírzá therefore, despatched Maḥram (Beg) Kokah with a body of troops to that country which they occupied. Massacres were frequent and their intolerable tyranny drove the people to rise till the Mughal chiefs sued for terms and withdrew. In the year A. H. 930, (1523-4) by command of Sulṭán Sạíd Khán of Káshghar, his son Sikandar Khán and Mirzá Haidar2 advanced into Kashmír at the head of 10,000 troops by way of Tibet and Lár, and taking an enormous booty retired after a short time under terms of peace. In the year A. H. 948 (1541-2) Mirzá Haidar, by command of Humáyún a second time entered Kashmír, guided by some of the natives of that country, as has been related in former accounts, and took possession of a part of Great Tibet. Káji Chak came to Hindustán and bringing with him the aid of an army from Sher Khán, engaged Mirzá Haidar but was defeated. The Mirzá won over the Kashmíris by peaceful and conciliatory measures, so that he succeeded in having the Khutbah read and the coin minted in the name of Humáyún, the Kashmíris having previously read the Khutbah in the name of Názuk Sháh.
At the present time under the sway of His Imperial Majesty it is the secure and happy abode of many nationalities, including natives of Persia and Turkestán as well as of Kashmír.
Its length is 35 and its breadth 25 kós. It is bounded on the east by Kashmír, on the north by Katór,3 on the south by the territory of the Gakhars,4 and on the west by Aṭak Benáres. Timúr left a few troops to hold this tract, and their descendants remain there to this day. Snow lies perpetually on these mountains and at times falls on the plains.1 The period of winter is longer than the summer. The rainfall is somewhat similar to Hindustán. It is watered by three rivers, the Kishan Ganga, the Bihat and the Sindh. The language of the country differs from that of Kashmír, Hindustán or Zábulistán. Vetches and barley are the principal crops. Apricots, peaches and walnuts grow wild, it not being the custom to plant fruit trees. Game and horses, camels and buffaloes are of middling account: goats and poultry, plentiful. The rulers of this district generally paid tribute to Kashmír.
It comprises three districts, those of Bimbar, Swát and Bajaur. The first is 16 kós long by 12 broad and is bounded by Pakli on the east, Kator and Káshghar2 on the north, Aṭak Benáres on the south and Swát on the west. Two roads approach it from Hindustán, viz., the Shérkháni3 pass and the Balandari4 Kótal; although both routes are difficult to traverse, the first is the more rugged.
The second district (Swát) is 40 kós in length by 5 to 15 in breadth. On the east lies Bimbar; to the north Katór (Kunar) and Káshghar; to the south Bigrám5 and on the west Bajaur. It possesses many defiles. Near the Damghár6 pass which leads to Káshghar is the town of Manglór7 the residence of the governor. It is entered by two routes from Hindustán, viz., the passes of Malkand Baj1 and Sherkhánah. It has no extremes of heat or cold, and though snow falls, it does not lie in the plains for more than three or four days; in the mountains it is perpetual. It is spring-time here during the periodical rains of Hindustán. Rainfall occurs and the spring and autumn are very delightful. Its flora are those of Turkestán and India, wild violets and narcissus covering the meadows, and various kinds of fruit trees grow wild. Peaches and pears are excellent, and fine hawks and falcons are obtained. It also possesses an iron mine.
The third district (Bajaur) is 25 kós in length by 5 to 10 in breadth. On the east lies Swát, on the north Katór and Káshghar, on the south Bigrám, and on the west Kunér (and) Núrkil.2 Numerous passes lead from Kábul.
An ancient mausoleum3 exists here, and there is a strong fortress which is said to be the residence of the governor. Amír Sayyid Ali Hamadáni died here and his body was conveyed to Khutlán4 by his last testament. Its climate is similar to that of Swát, but the extremes of cold and heat are greater. It has only three roads, one from Hindustán called Dánishkol, and two from Kábul, one called Samaj and the other Kunér and Núrkil, the easiest of these being Dánishkol. Adjoining this and between the mountains and the Indus and Kabul rivers, is a plain, 30 kós in length by 20 to 25 kós in breadth.
The whole of this tract of hill and plain is the domain of the Yusufzai clan. In the time of Mirzá Ulugh Beg of Kábul, they migrated from Kábul to this territory and wrested it from the Sulṭáns who affected to be descended from a daughter of Alexander Bicornutus. It is said that this monarch left some of his treasures in these parts with a few of his kindred and to this day the descendants of this band dwell in these mountains and affect to show their genealogical descent from Alexander.1
Under the present ever-during Imperial sway, of the lawless inhabitants of this country, some have been put to death, others imprisoned, while some happily dwell under their tribal rule.
and Isakhel.
This territory is to the south-east of Kábul, and is inhabited entirely by Afgháns. It is the principal settlement of the Shiráni, Kararáni and Wazíri tribes.
It is situated in the third climate. Its length from Ḳalát Banjárah to Ghor and Gharjistán3 is 300 kós: its breadth from Sind to Farah is 260 kós. On its east lies Sind; to the north Ghór and Gharjistán; on the south Síwi, and on the west Farah; Kábul and Ghaznín on the north-east. Its mountains are covered with perpetual snow which seldom falls in the city.
Eighteen dinárs4 make a túmán, and each túmán is equivalent to 800 dáms. The túmán of Khurásán is equal in value to 30 rupees and the túmán of Iráḳ to 40.
Grain is for the most part taken in kharwárs, the kharwár being equivalent to 40 Ḳandahári man, or 10 of Hindustán.
The capital of the district is Ḳandahár. Its longitude is 107°1 40', and the latitude 33° 40'. It has two forts. The summer heats are extreme and the cold in winter is inconsiderable, but the ice-pits are filled in December and January. Once in three or four years a fall of snow occurs and is hailed with delight. Flowers and fruits are in abundance. Its wheat is extremely white, and is sent as a present of value to distant countries. At a distance of five kós is a hill called Azhdarkoh (the Dragon Hill) in which is a wonderful cave known as the Cave of Jamshíd. People enter with lighted lamps, but the oppression of its atmosphere prevents exploration of its extent. Eight kós from Ḳálát is a large mountain in the side of which is a huge cave called Ghár i Sháh (the King's Cave). Within it are two natural columns, one of which touches the roof of the cave and is 30 yards high. Water flows down it and enters a basin at its foot. The other is 11 yards in height. The waters of the Hirmand (Helmand) which rises between Balkh, and Kábul, flow in this direction along the skirts2 of the mountains. The meaning of Hirmand is ‘abound-ing in blessings.’ Mauláná Mụínu'ddín in his history of Khurásán records that it feeds a thousand streams. At a distance of 16 kós is a mountain, at the base of which is an area of land called Natíl,3 formerly full of watercourses, where melons are grown in great quantity and perfection. The mountain has several clear springs. There is also an iron-mine, and at the foot of the mountain is an iron-foundry for the smelting of the ore, a work of ancient times.
West of Ḳandahár is a long torrid tract of country, (Garmsír) through which flows the Hirmand. One side of it touches the Dáwar4 territory, and on the other Sístán. There are many forts and much cultivation on both sides of the river. In this neighbourhood once stood a large city, the residence of the Sulṭáns of Ghor, and many ruins still exist of the palaces of its ancient kings.
Between the Hirmand and Ḳandahár is the well-known city of Maimand, described in old astronomical tables.
Wheat and barley are called Safédbari.1
The jaríb of sixty (square)
yards is used for measurements, but they reckon 30 yards of this according
to the Hijázi jaríb, each yard of 24½ digits, the gaz there in use; equal
altogether to 54 gaz of Ḳandahár. In the exchequer, out of every ten
kharwárs, two are taken for the minister of finance on account of revenue
and jihát cesses. Cultivation is reckoned under seven heads. In the
registers, the best kind of land is marked with an
| No. | Kind of land. | Distinguishing Mark. | Produce in Kharwárs. | Revenue in man. |
| 1 | Best. | 3 | 24 | |
| 2 | Best and Medium. | 2½ | 20 | |
| 3 | Medium. | 2 | 16 | |
| 4 | Medium and Poor. | 1½ | 12 | |
| 5 | Poor. | 1 | 8 | |
| 6 | Poor and Poorest. | 30 man. | 6 | |
| 7 | Poorest. | 8 | 4 |
But if the husbandman is incapable of sustaining this class of assessment, the produce is divided into three heaps, two of which are taken by the tenant, and the third is again subdivided into three shares, two2 of which go to the revenue department and the third is charged to incidental expenses.
The revenue from grapes also is taken by agreement and by paying a special rate. In the latter case experts appraise the average outturn of the vineyard and exact 4 báberies for each kharwár. Under the reigns of Báber and Humáyún the rate was fixed at 2 báberis and 4 tangahs. The baberi is one miskál1 weight and 2½ are equivalent to the rupee. Besides these three (wheat, barley, grapes), upon nine other articles called sabzbari, 7½ báberis are taken for every jaríb, formerly rated at 5 báberis, viz., rice (Sháli), musk-melons, water-melons, cucumbers, onions, turnips, carrots and lettuce. On other crops than these, two báberis were formerly taken, the Turkománs exacting three.
In the torrid tract (above-mentioned, between Dáwar and Sístan),
the safédbari crops are divided into three heaps according to the Ḳandahár
custom and all crops paying special rates are registered under the
In the Dáwar tract, produce under safédbari is apportioned in three heaps as described above and the exchequer receives for every 4 jaríbs, one kharwár weight of Dáwar, which is equivalent to one kharwár and ten man of Ḳandahár, and for other produce, one kharwár on three jaríbs.2
Containing 24 Mahals. Revenue 8,114½ túmáns, 39,600 dinárs: 45,775 sheep; 45 Balochi horses: 3,752,977 kharwárs of grain; 420 man of rice; 2 kharwárs of flour; 20 man of clarified butter. It furnishes 13,875 Cavalry and 25,260 Infantry. Ḳandahár city—5,270 tumáns in cash; 35,120 kharwárs of corn; 550 horse; 1,000 foot.
The valley of the Jhelum takes the name of Trímáb (Three rivers) after its junction with the Chenáb and the Rávi and that of Panjnad (Five rivers) after receiving the united waters of the Beás and Sutlej. I. G. This restricted signification cannot here apply. Certain outlying portions beyond the limits of the Punjáb Proper were evidently attached to the Súbahs of Lahor and Multán and to the sarkar of Dipalpúr and were denominated—Birún i Panjnad. Their position may be surmised but assurance is perhaps beyond reach. The first two of these three names I cannot satisfactorily trace.
↩Khatpúr is placed by Abul Fazl in the Rachna Doáb and by Tieffenthaler as the first stage in a journey from Lahor to Multán. “On passe en venant de Lahore par Kabpur, Gazarsaray, Noschhara, Satghara, Harpam, Maktounpour, Kanpour d'on l'on se rend tout droit a Moultan.”
↩ The text diffidently forms two names
of these four, viz., Harhári, Dandnúrni
but the authority of the two best MSS.
(relegated to the notes) divides them.
One at least of these names, Dand, still
lives in the local designation of a former
bank of the Sutlej, whose shifting course
has modified the aspect of the country.
One ancient bed, forming the base of the
segment where the Sutlej after its junction
with the Beás curves round to the
south-west is called the Sukhar Nai (I.
G.) which crosses the district east to west
and joins the modern channel near the
borders of Sirsa. The Danda bank points
to a still more ancient course crossing
the south-west corner 35 miles east of
the present stream, traceable as far as
Moodkee and thence at intervals to the
Sutlej 15 miles farther north. The old
beds of the Rávi and Beás which formerly
united their waters much lower down,
at present may be traced through a
great part of the Bári Doáb. (I. G.)
Tieffenthaler transforms the whole river
system locating the confluence of the
Rávi and the Galongara (his local name
for the Sutlej augmented by the Beás)
within 3 miles of Uch and that of the
Chenáb and Rávi at a town named “Sultanpour,”
otherwise called “Noschahra,”
near which the Rávi, joined by the Sutlej
and Beás falls into and loses its name
in the Chenáb, and this river, now holding
the Jhelum, Rávi, Sutlej and Beás,
continues to retain its own. See the
ancient courses of these rivers in Cunningham's
Ancient Geography of India,
p. 220, et seq. General Cunningham bases
his discussion on Gladwin's translation,
viz., ‘For the distance of 17 kós from
Feerozpoor, the rivers Beyah and Seteluj
unite: and then again as they pass
along, divide into 4 streams, viz., the
Hur, Haray, Dund and the Noorny:
and near the city of Multán these 4
branches join again,” and says that these
beds still exist but their names are lost.
Now Abul Fazl does not say that the
Sutlej divides into 4 streams, but that
it bears several names. I have been
careful to be exactly literal in my version.
The difficulty lies in the meaning
of the words
The main stream of the Indus. See its course and the names of its channels in Cunningham's Ancient Geography of India, pp. 252, 272, 286, 298, &c. The Indus is called the Mihrán by Ibn Haukal but his information leads him to believe that its source is the Oxus from whence passing Multán and being joined by the Sind! at three marches from that town falls into the sea at Dambal (Debal). Ousely, p. 155.
↩Properly 30° 12' N. Long. 71° 30' 45". Tieff. gives the longitude from the Fortunate Islands at 108° but this he considers excessive. Baháu'ddín is mentioned in Vol. I, 399, and Ferishta's monograph of the saint will probably satisfy his modern disciples.
↩After the decline of the Arab power in Sind about A. D. 871, two native kingdoms raised themselves at Multán and Mansúrah. The former comprised the upper valley of the Indus as far as Alor; the latter extended from that town to the sea and nearly coincided with the modern province of Sind. Alor, or Aror, the capital, almost rivalled Multán and had an extensive commerce. I. G. Genl. Cunningham (Ancient Geog.) gives the name of Manṣúrah to the town founded, according to Masạúdi, by Jamhúr, the Moslem governor of Sindh, and named after his own father Manṣúr, so close to Brahmanábád as to be regarded as the same place. His learned discussion depends too much on analogies of sound in names, to be quite convincing. See, also, Mansúra in Elliot's Arabs in Sind, p. 50, et seq.
↩Síwi, Sewistán, and Sehwán are constantly confounded or mistaken as Elliot remarks without, however, himself determining the position of the first which is a town or the geographical limits of the second which is a province. Síwi is somewhat south of the direct line between Dera Ghazi Khán and Quetta, now well known as Síbi. Vol. I, p. 362, Séwe.
↩Var. and G. Dáman.
↩Var. Jhhar, Chhar.
↩Var. U´ti.
↩Among some illegible variants, Thánah.
↩Var. and G. Khardar, but Kahror is well-known in Multán District. See I. G. and Cunningham, p. 241.
↩Var. and T. Khailúldi.
↩T. and G. Khelu.
↩The Degh (I. G.) is the chief tributary of the Rávi, which it receives after entering Montgomery District on its north-west bank and then passes into Multán District.
↩A slight notice of the Kharals occurs in the description of the Montgomery District. I. G.
↩Of these Cunningham can identify but Uch, Diráwal, Moj and Marot, which he places, east of the Sutlej. The limits of the province of Multán in the time of Hwen Thsang included the north half of the Bhawalpur territory in addition to the tract lying between the rivers, the north frontier extending from Derah Dín Panáh on the Indus to Pák Pattan, a distance of 150 miles; on the west, the frontier line of the Indus to Kkánpúr, 160 miles; on the east from Pák Pattan to the old bed of the Ghagar, 80 miles: on the south from Khánpúr to the Ghagar, 220 miles, p. 220.
↩Var. Narwi Barwi.
↩Var. Dawái, Dadái.
↩Var. and G. Malót.
↩See Cunningham, Ancient Geography. India, p. 213, et seq for this Sarkár.
↩Var. Kesóthi.
↩Var. and G. Dhansháh.
↩Var. and G. Lakhi Ḳabúlah.
↩Var. Jóiyah, see Johiya under Montgomery Dist. in I. G. with other Rávi tribes. Also Cunningham, p. 245.
↩Var. Yúsḳáni, Losfáni. G. Yúsḳáni.
↩Var. Bhírahpál.
↩Var. Jahni.
↩At p. 113, Sadkarah.
↩Text note suggests Laṭṭi as the proper reading. As there are about 300 clans of Sindhis, besides the tribes and castes of Hindustán proper, that may be located in or about this region, their identification is almost as hopeless as their orthography.
↩Var. Saranjah. The Dharejah forest is in Shikarpur District I. G. under Sind.
↩Var. Janah or Jatah.
↩Var. Sahechah, Sahja, Samjah.
↩Var. and G. Gharjánah.
↩This province, says the U. T., was first conquered by Mahomed Kásim at the end of the first century Hejira. It was recovered by the Hindús on the decline of the Ghazni power. After Mahomed Ghori's subjugation it remained tributary to Delhi until
| A. H. | A. D. | |
| 847. | 1443. | Shaikh Yúsuf established an independent monarchy. |
| 849. | 1445. | Ray Sehra, or Ḳuṭbu'ddin Hosen Langa I expelled the Shaikh. |
| 908. | 1502. | Maḥmúd Khán Langa; his minister Jam Bayezid. |
| 931. | 1524. | Hosen Langa II, overcome by Sháh Hosen Arghún. Under Humayún, becomes a province of the empire. |
This name is altogether omitted by Ferishta who describes Ḳuṭbu'ddín's intrigue and succession, in his history of Multán. The name of Ḳuṭbu'ddín was Ráe Sahra and he was governor of Sewi and the adjacent territory and the head of the Afghán clan of Langáh. He died in A. H. 874 (A. D. 1469), Ḥusain Sháh in 904 or 908 (1498 or 1502) and Maḥmúd in 931 (1524).
↩Ferishta gives his death on the 26th of Safar A. H. 908 (1502) but adds that another account makes it 4 years earlier. The whole of this narrative in much greater detail will be found in that historian.
↩See this name in the I. G. (Index), under “Lahari Bandar,” and in Cunningham in his account of Sindh. (Ancient Geography).
↩ The text is, I think, here in error
in transforming this name into the
Persian
The town lies in Lat. 24° 44' N. and Long. 68° E.
↩Identified by Cunningham with Harmatelia, (a softer pronunciation of Brâhmathala, or Brahmanasthala) of Diodorus and placed on the east branch of the Mihrán or Indus, 47 miles north-east of Haidarábad, 28 miles east of Hâla and 20 miles west of the eastern channel of the Indus known as Nára. He gives the number of bastions as 140 on the authority of the MSS. but both Gladwin and Blochmann concur in 1,400, and there is no variant reading. His conclusion is, that the place known now as Bambhra ka thûl represents the ruined city of Mansura and the neighbouring mound now called Dilura, Brahmanábád. They certainly attest his industry and research if not his conclusion which the absence of local coins of Hindú origin, though many of Arab governors are found, somewhat impugns.
↩See p. 61.
↩The ruins of Alor, or more correctly Aror, are situated to the south of a gap in the low range of limestone hills stretching from Bhakar to the south for about 20 miles until it is lost in the broad belt of sand hills bounding the Nára or old bed of the Indus. On the west, Cunningham regards it as the capital of the Musicani of Curtius. He disputes the assertion of Abul Fazl that Debal and Tattah are the same. Sir H. Elliot places Debal at Karáchi. General Cunningham prefers a site between Karáchi and Tattah and is “almost certain” that it must be the Indian city in which Zobeide in the Arabian Nights found all the people turned to stone. This certitude on such a point is striking and original.
↩The Lakhi range (the text duplicates the k.) is an offshoot from the Kirthar which separates Sind from Beluchistán. I. G. Kohbár has a variant Korahyár, but I do not trace it; the Maásir 'ul Umara has Kohbár but as its description of Sindh is taken from Abul Fazl, its authority is of no independent value.
↩The Baloch and the Brahui are the two great races of Balochistan, each subdivided into an infinite number of tribes. Of these the Kumberani is said to take precedence of all others. The name in the text is not mentioned in the works I have consulted. Sherring mentions Kirmani.
↩No doubt the Kirthar range of the I. G., an off shoot of which, the Lakhi, terminates abruptly a few miles south of Sehwán. Naẓhari has a variant Ṭahzari adopted by Gladwin. The plain country to the east of the mountain mass that intervenes between it and Khelát is called Kachhi or Kachh Gandává and Kárah seems to be a spur that strikes thence to the Lakhi chain. North of the Bolán, confused ranges of mountains extend to east with a strike nearly east and west to the Sulaimán range. This tract inhabited by Marris, Bugtis and other Baloch tribes is bounded on the north by the province of Sewistán (I. G.) General Cunningham states that Sehwán is said to be a contraction of Sewistán and rejects it as a modern innovation of the Hindus, but he could scarcely have seen the text of Abul Fazl whose account does not admit of this view.
↩Literally ‘short legged.’ It is mentioned by Baber in his Memoirs among the fauna of Kábul and India and is thus described in Erskine's translation. “Its size may be equal to that of the white deer. Its two fore-legs as well as its thighs are short, whence its name. Its horns are branching like those of the gawezin but less. Every year too it casts its horns like the stag. It is a bad runner and therefore never leaves the jungle.” These characteristics seem to point to the hog-deer. (Cervus porcinus.)
↩ I believe this to be the proper translation
of
According to Cunningham, the early Arab geographers place a strong fort called Bhátia between Multán and Alor, which, from its position has a claim to be identified with the city built by Alexander among the Sogdi, but he mentions no tribe of the name, neither have any of the Bhaṭṭi Rajputs mentioned by Elliot any such prefix as Ahshám. The Sodahs have been identified by Tod with the Sogdoi. Ancient Geography, pp. 253-254.
↩Var. 6,615,293.
↩Var. Patora, Batwár, Banwár.
↩Though there is no variant to this name, I suspect that there has been a transposition of the K and R, and that it is meant for the town of Jarak situated midway between Haidarábad and Tattah.
↩See Elliot, Arabs in Sind, p. 230.
↩ So I have translated
The following list is from the U. T.
| A. H. | A. D. | |
| 87. | 705. | Bélochistán invaded by Hijaj, governor of Bassora, and Md. Kásím. |
The Ansaries, the Sumeras, and the Sumanas or Jams, successively gain the ascendancy, then a Delhi, governor 1203? Nasír ud din Kabbacha, becomes independent, drowned.
The Jami Dynasty of Sumana, originally Rájputs.
| A. H. | A. D. | |
| 737. | 1336. | Jám Afra; tributary to Toghlak Sháh. |
| 740. | 1339. | Jám Choban. |
| 754. | 1383. | ” Bang; asserted his independence. |
| 782. | 1367. | ” Timaji, his brother. |
| 782. | 1380. | ” Saláhu'ddin, convert to Islám. |
| 793. | 1391. | ” Nizamu'ddin. |
| 796. | 1393. | ” Ally Sher. |
| 812. | 1409. | ” Giran, son of Timaji. |
| 812. | 1409. | ” Fatteh Khán. |
| 827. | 1423. | ” Toghlak, invaded Gujerat. |
| 854. | 1450. | ” Sikandar. |
| 856. | 1452. | ” Sangar, elected. |
| 864. | 1460. | Jám Nandá or Nizámu'ddin, cot. of Hasan Langa. |
| 894. | 1492. | ” Feroz; the Turkhan family became powerful, 1520. |
| 927. | 1520. | Sháh Beg Arghun, occupies Sind. |
| 930. | 1523. | Sháh Hosein Arghun. |
| 962. | 1554. | Maḥmúd of Bhakar. |
| 982. | 1572. | Akbar annexes Sind. (Ferishta, 1001 = 1592.) |
Tíeffenthaler's list except in the first 3
names is in accordance with these, allowing
for his erratic spelling: Elliot's
taken from the Tarikh i Masúmi, changes
the third name only. Ferishta gives the
1st and 3rd names Afzáh and Máni;
Briggs, Afrá and Bany. Ferishta makes
Tamáji son of Mání; Briggs, his brother.
Ferishta allots 62 years to the reign of
Nizámu'ddin Nandá; Briggs, 32, and
his dates are not taken from Ferishta
who gives none except to the last 3 on
the U. T. list and in accordance with it.
I have to note that Ferishta gives the
duration of the Sumra dynasty, as 100
years and not 500 as Briggs records and
the name of the succeeding race, Satmah
or Sutmah (
Of the Rai dynasty whose capital was Alor. The Tuhfatúl Kirám makes Siharas the son and successor of Rái Díwáij, followed by Rái Sáhasi, the first, second and third of that name. It was under the latter that Chach rose to power. The names are differently given by Postans. The same Persian work distributes 137 years over the reigns of these 3 Ráis. The accession of Chach and the extinction of the Rái dynasty is placed by Elliot in the year 10 A. H. Arabs in Sind, pp. 169-173. See also Chacknamah. Elliot's Hist. of India. Vol. I. p. 138.
↩So the text, but a note amends it “Chach.” The orthography is doubtful. Two MSS. in the Bibliotheque Royale have Hoj: Reinaud spells the name Tchotch: Renouard leans to Jaj as he considers it a corruption of Yajnya. De Sacy favours Hajáj. Pottinger writes Chach and is followed by all English authors. Elliot, Arabs in Sind, p. 174.
↩See Elliot's Arabs in Sind, p. 3.
↩Hákim. b. Jabala al Abdi was sent to explore Sejistán and Mekrân and the countries bordering on the Indus valley by Abdu'llah Ámar, a cousin of the Cáliph, who had succeeded Abu Músa Ashạri in the government of Basra. His report was as follows: “Water in that country is of a dark colour, flowing only drop by drop, the fruits are sour and unwholesome, rocks abound and the soil is brackish. The thieves are intrepid warriors, and the bulk of the population dishonest and treacherous. If the troops sent there are few in number, they will be exterminated, if they are numerous, they will perish of hunger.” Ibid. pp. 9 and 10. The expeditions of Ali and Muáwiyah and the progress of the Arab conquests in Sind may be read in the succeeding pages. Elliot's conclusion that Debal was taken in A. H. 93 is confirmed by As Suyúti in the biography of Al Walíd, b. Abdu'l Malik, in which year Kírakh, or Kíraj as Ibn ul Athír calls it, was also captured. (See my translation of As Suyúti's History of the Caliphs, p. 229.) Elliot thinks this probably situated in, if not named from Kachh. I supposed it to be Karáchi which he identifies with the ancient Krokala of Arrian, but this does not alter its possible metathesis among the Arabs, into Kíraj. The pursuit of these analogies may be interesting but the resnlt is conjecture.
↩Described in Elphinstone (Ed. 66) p. 308, and in Brigg's Ferishta, IV, p. 417.
↩Several of this tribe were at various periods sent to Sind. Under the Caliphate of Yazíd b. Abd u'l Malik, Halál a't Tamími was sent in pursuit of the Banu Muhallab. About 107 A. H. Tamím b. Zaid al Ụtbi succeeded Junaid in the government of that province and died near Debal. Under the Abbassides Músa b. Kạb a't Tamími, drove out Manṣúr b. Jamhúr the Umayyad governor. Abdu'r Razzák the first Ghaznevide governor of Sind, about A. H. 417, (1026) found the descendants of old Arab settlers of the tribes of Thakífi, Tamími, Asad and many other families. The length of the Tamími occupation is unknown or disputed, and the obscurity of the annals of the time precludes the possibility of decision.
↩Máni according to Ferishta who says that the expedition of Fíróz Tughlak took place in 763 A. H. (A. D. 1320) and was unsuccessful owing to want of supplies and forage which Máni had cut off by devastating the country. He retired to Gujarát and after the rains and on the approach of winter, the second invasion occurred which led to the submission of Máni.
↩Ferishta says, 927 A. H.
↩See Note 5, p. 220.
↩Tarkhán was originally a rank among the Mughals and Turks, but in the time of Baber it had come to belong to a particular family. The ancient Tarkhán was exempt from all duties and could enter the royal presence without asking leave and was to be pardoned nine times be the fault what it would. He had perfect liberty of speech and might say what he pleased before royalty. The name constantly occurs in the early portion of Baber's Memoris.
↩He has omitted the succession of Muḥammad Báḳi son of Isá Tarkhán to whom Ferishta gives a prosperous reign of 18 years. The genealogical tree of Mirzá Jáni Beg and the subsequent history of this family will be found at pp. 361-2, Vol. I of this work. Ferishta altogether omits Muḥammad Payandah and gives the succession to Jáni Beg immediately after Muḥammad Báḳi.
↩The spelling is that of the text and varies from the same name given a little above. According to Cunningham, the name of “Bhimbhar” was little used, the common appellation being Chibhán which is found in Sharfu'ddín's History of Timúr under the form of Jibhál.
↩The text has “Hasti Watar,” but the present Governor of Jammu, Pandit Radha Kishan Kaul, with whom it has been my good fortune to be placed in communication, and whose courtesy adds a grace to his learning, has proved its inaccuracy and has suggested the emendation. The name with its derivation occurs later on and will be noticed in its place. The three different routes into Kashmír are thus described by the Pandit.
The first runs almost in a straight line passing through Nowsherah, Rajori, the Pír Panjál pass and Shupiyon. The second deviating from Rajori runs to the Púnch river and on to Púnch and crossing the Háji Pír, joins the Murree road near Uri. The third, parting from Samani Sarai, passes through Kotli and Sera to Púnch and unites with the second. The route by Shupiyon is the Pir Panjál. The second is Tangtalah which name, however, is no longer known and is probably a misscript. The third is believed by the Pandit to be the Hasti Bhanj, for it is the only one by which elephants can travel, and to this day elephants from Jammu must be sent by Kotli to Púnch and across Háji Pír to Uri. Cf. Vigne's Kashmír and Ladák, I. 147 in which 20 passes into Kashmír are mentioned and described.
↩Panchál in most of the MSS. which Cunningham asserts is the pronunciation of the Punjábis, and Pantsál of the Kashmíris, p. 128. The superstition regarding the tempest of wind and snow and rain, appears to be connected with that of the Yedeh or rain-stone frequently alluded to by Baber, the history of which is given by D'Herbelot. It is of Tartar origin and the virtues of the stone are celebrated in Yarkand and attested by authorities who have never witnessed them. It is said to be found in the head of a horse or a cow, and if steeped in blood of an animal with certain ceremonies, a wind arises followed by snow and rain. See the introduction to Baber's memoirs by Erskine, p. xlvii. The word Pír, according to Drew (Jummoo and Kashmir) has come to be used more or less generally in Kashmír for “pass,” probably from the “pír” or fakír who often established himself upon it to maintain or acquire the reputation of sanctity. Pír Panjál has come to mean the pass of the Great Range, Panjál being applied to a great mountain ridge. There was once a fakír who lived on it and bore the title of “pír.” Bernier who crossed in Aurangzeb's time mentions a hermit on the pass who had lived there since the reign of Jahangír. The creed he professed was not known, but his powers were said to be miraculous and the elements were under his control, rain, hail, storm and wind rising or ceasing at his bidding. He demanded alms in a tone of authority, and forbade any noise being made lest a tempest should be the consequence, an experience which Jahángir incurred to his extreme peril through disobedience of this injunction. Voyages, II, 290.
↩ The terms are A´bi, Lalmi. The
first signifies in the N.-W. P., land
watered from ponds, tanks, lakes and
watercourses, in distinction to that
watered from wells, and as being liable
to fail in the hot season, is assessed at a
lower rate. The second is a Pushtu
word (Raverty) and means growing
spontaneously and applied to crops
wholly dependent on rain for irrigation
or spring crops. The next term Chalkhai
in the text I have ventured to
amend as
Dr. King takes this to be probably the Fritillaria Imperialis, though there is nothing against the plant being a real tulip. The T. stellata is common in many parts of the N. W. Himalayas, so common as to be a troublesome weed in the fields. The European tulip is only one of a large genus and is not likely to be the plant referred to. Moorcroft says that the roofs are formed of layers of birch bark covered by a coating of earth in which seeds dropped by birds or wafted by the wind have vegetated and they are constantly overrun with grass and flowers.
↩All travellers from Hwen Thsang downwards concur in this opinion, but Moorcroft almost alone has realised that the vices of the Kashmírian are due to the effects of his political condition rather than his nature, and that the transformation of his character is possible to a better government and a purer faith. Mendicancy has largely developed since Abul Fazl's day.
↩Gladwin and the S. ul M. have here ‘mu'ng,’ the pulse, Phaseolus mun??o.
↩The chick-pea, Cicer arietinum.
↩ Here follow two words,
The text has
The languages of Kashmír are divided into 13 separate dialects. Of these Dogri and Chibali which do not differ much from Hindustáni and Panjábi are spoken on the hills and the Púnch and Jammu country. Kashmíri is mostly used in Kashmír proper and is curiously and closely related to Sanskrit. Five dialects are included in the term Pahári: two are Tibetan spoken in Baltistán, Ludakh and Champas) and three or four varieties of the Dard dialects of Aryan origin in the North-West. The thirteen dialects are enumerated and discussed by Drew (Jummoo and Kashmír) and a Language map defines the groups that are mutually incomprehensible, classifying the dialects under five languages. Cunningham says that the Devanagari alphabet of India was introduced into Tibet from Kashmír in the first half of the 7th century of our era. Thumi Sambhota was the first who taught the Tibetans the use of the Kashmírian characters which remain unchanged to this day. Ladák, p. 5.
↩ Túz in the Burhán i Ḳáṭí is said to
be the bark of a tree used to wrap round
saddles and bows. According to Dozy,
Ibn Baitár makes it synonymous with
As the account of this sect in Ferishta has been almost entirely passed over by Briggs in his translation, the omission may be here made good and will serve the double purpose of supplementing his version and elucidating the present text. With the following note may be compared a monograph on the Roshaníyah sect by Dr. Leyden in the XIth Vol. Asiatic Researches.
Mirzá Haidar (Doghlát) in his work the Kitab i Rashídí says that formerly all the inhabitants of Kashmír were of the Ḥanifi sect. In the time of Fatḥ Sháh, a man named Shamsu'ddín came from Iráḳ and declared himself to be a follower of Mír Muḥammad Núr Baksh. He introduced a new form of religion which he called Núrbakshi and promulgated various heretic and impious opinions and circulated among the reprobate a book of theology named Uhútah which accords neither with the Sunni or Shiạh belief. And the followers of this sect, like heretics, consider it their duty to revile and abuse the three Caliphs and Ayesha, but unlike the Shiạhs, they regard Amír Sayyid Muḥammad Núr Baksh as the Mahdi and Apostle of his time, and they do not believe as the Shiạhs do in saints and holy persons, but consider them to be Sunnis. He thus introduced innovations in religious worship as well as in worldly transactions, and styled his creed Núrbakshi. Mirzá Haidar adds, ‘I have seen many elders of this sect in Badakshán who have shared in my literary and scientific pursuits. They all outwardly observe the various religious obligations and follow the instructions of the Prophet, and their belief is in conformity with that of the Sunnis. One of the sons of Amír Sayyid Md. Núr Baksh showed me his work. There was a striking passage in it which runs thus: “Kings and the rich and the ignorant are of opinion that worldly power cannot be combined with piety and purity of heart in any one person. This idea is altogether false, for the great prophets and apostles, notwithstanding their divine legation ruled kingdoms and strove likewise for purity of heart, such as Joseph, Solomon, David, Moses and our Prophet.” This opinion is opposed to the belief of the Núrbakshi sect but is in accord with that of the Sunnis. I sent the theological work Uhútah which was well known in those days in Kashmír to the learned men of India. Their judgment on it was as follows: ‘O God, show unto us the truth in its reality and the false wherein it is void, and show unto us things as they verily are.’ After a studious and careful consideration of this work, it appears to us that its author believes in a false religion, has forsaken the divine commands and prohibitions and has excluded himself from the congregation of the Sunnis. In his pretension that God hath commanded him to do away with all differences, firstly, in the developments of the religious teaching of Islam that have arisen among the followers of the Prophet and to restore it to the form it held in his time without addition or diminution, and secondly, in its fundamental principles among the sects and among all peoples with certainty of belief, he is false and inclined to the doctrine of heretics and perverts. It is the religious duty of those who have the power, to destroy this book and efface it from the earth, and to extirpate this religion, root and branch, and to prohibit persons from following it and acting according to its dogmas. And if they persist in their belief and abandon not their false creed, it is necessary for the security of the Muslims from their ill example, to chastise and even slay them. But if they abandon it and repent of their past conduct, they should be directed to follow the teaching of Abu Ḥanifa to whom our Prophet alluded in his saying, ‘Lamp of my followers.’ When this declaration reached me, I compelled many men of Kashmír who were much disposed to this heresy, to accept willingly or otherwise the true religion and I put others to death. Some of these men saved themselves by adopting mystic doctrines and called themselves Súfis. In reality they are not sincere Súfis, but are a sprinkling of heretics and atheists who lead men astray, do not know what is lawful or unlawful, consider night watching and abstinence in food, acts of piety and purity, eat whatever is put before them, are avaricious and greedy to an extreme; sedulously employ themselves in the interpretation of dreams, fortune-telling and disclosing events, past and future; prostrate themselves before one another, and together with such disgraceful acts, observe the forty days of retirement; are averse from the pursuits of the learned, walk proudly in the way of interior holiness, omitting the observance of religious forms and ceremonies, and maintain that the former is independent of the latter. In short, such heretics and atheists are not to be found elsewhere in the world. May God preserve us, and take the people of Islam under His protection, and save them from such calamities and misfortunes in the name of Muḥammad and his descendants.” Before these people, there lived in Kashmír a sect of Sun-worshippers who were called Shammássín. Their creed was that the sun's light owed its existence to their purity of faith, and that they themselves existed through the light of the sun, and that if they rendered their faith impure, the sun would cease to be. On the other hand if the sun ceased to shine they would not live; thus they owed their existence to the sun and without them it could not endure. When the sun is present, that is in the day-time they are bound to act virtuously, as he sees their actions, but when it is night and the sun neither sees them nor has knowledge of what they do, their moral responsibility for their deeds ceases. This sect called themselves “Shamsu'ddín (Sun of Religion) pretending to receive the delivery of the title from heaven. The Kashmíris abbreviated it into Shammási.”
↩Cf. Vol. I, p. 16, n. 36, and 37.
The Surkh is the common red and
black bead, Abrus precatorius, and is equal
to a Rati in weight. For Dáni, the S.
nl M. has Dának
The other = 11 máshas = 88 do.
The Kashmíri
| mohur = 16 dáni or | = 96 surkhs. |
| dánáḳs | |
| 1 D = 6 S |
The 96 ratis or surkhs in a tolah exactly represent the 96 carat grains in the gold assay pound.
↩The faultiness of the text has been correted by the learning of the Governor of Jammu who tells me that “rop” signifies silver, and “sás” a thousand, in Kashmíri. In former times ordinary money transactions were conducted in Kashmír by means of copper coins, for the great majority of payments were made in grain which has always been abundant there, but from its monopoly by the State, difficult to obtain. One copper coin was called a hundred, and two coppers two hundred, and so on. A thousand, represented 10 coppers which was probably the only silver coin of early times. Its value now would be about 2½ annas, but as Abul Fazl gives its weight as 9 máshas, its value would then have been about 10 annas. This coin is now unknown. The text has panchuhu and bárahkáni.
↩Serpent-worship, according to Genl. Cunningham, has been the prevailing religion in Kashmír from time immemorial. The reigning sovereign who at the time of Hwen Thsang's arrival in Kashmír in A. D. 631, was Durlabha, is said to have been the son of a Nága or Dragon, and the dynasty he founded is called the Nága or Karkola. Ancient Geography of India, p. 92.
↩The Jhelum, which nearly intersects the valley is formed, says the I. G., by the junction of three streams, the Arpat, Bring and Sandaram, and receives in its course numerous tributaries. It mentions the Tsont i Kul, or apple-tree canal connecting the Dal or city lake, with the Jhelum which it enters opposite the palace and the Nalli Már which flows into the Sind near Shádipúr connecting the Auchar with the Dal. The Dúdganga, a stream of good volume joins the river on the left bank at the city of Srinagar.
↩Srinagari, the old capital, prior to the erection of Pravarasenapura is stated in the Raja Tarangini to have been founded by Asoka, who reigned between B. C. 263–266. It stood on the site of the present Pándrethán, and is said to have extended along the bank of the river from the foot of the Takt i Sulaimán to Pántasok, a distance of more than three miles.
↩ The word is
This monastery is built entirely of wood. Pandit Radha Kishan, Governor of Jammu tells me that it is still extant and known as the Khánḳáh i Muálla, on the right bank of the Bihat above Zenu Kadal the fourth bridge of the town of Srinagar. An illustration of it will be found in the title page of Drew's Jammu and Kashmír, where it is called the mosque of Sháh Hamadán. His story is given in Vigne II. 82 and in Hügel's Travels, p. 117.
↩Tieffenthaler ascribes the cause of the phenomenon to the melting of the mountain snows under the influence of the sun which descending along hollows or by subterranean passages reach this cavern and boil up within it. The later ebullitions he conceives, are due either to the shade of the trees or the declining force of the sun on the snows. Bernier's opinion is somewhat the same. Voyages, II, 293.
↩Vigne (I. 339) on the contrary bears testimony to its being provocative of appetite. The spring, situated about 2½ miles from the iron works at Sof Ahan, forms a stream equal in volume to that of Vernag and far superior in the quality of its water.
↩The principal ancient cities of Kashmír are the old capital of Srinagari and the new, Pravarasenapúra which was lost in the former name: Khagendrapura and Khanamusha, identified with Kákapur on the left bank of the Bihat, ten miles to the south of the Takht i Sulaimán, and Khunamoh, four miles north-east of Pámpur: Vijipara and Pantasók. The formertwenty-five miles south-east of the capital: the latter thrce miles from the Takht i Sulaimán; Surapura the modern Sopur, mentioned in the Kashmír chronicles as Kambuva: Kanishkapúra, corrupted to Kámpur: Hushkapura probably Baramula: Jushkapúra now Zukru or Zukur four miles north of the capital: Parihasapúra built by Lalitaditya (A. D. 723–760): Sadmapura, now Pampur: and Avanlipúra, now only a small village, Wantipur, seventeen miles south-east of the present capital. Cunningham, pp. 95, 103. The text has Panjbrárah, Vigne, and Moorcroft Bij Beara, I follow the spelling of the Governor of Jammu.
↩See Vol. I, p. 84 where the method of cultivation of this plant is explained somewhat differently, and the Wákịát i Jahángiri, in Elliot's Hist. India, VI, 375.
↩I am indebted to Dr. King for the following note:
“There are three stamens and three stigmas in each flower. The latter yield the saffron. The style divides at the level of the anthers into three yellow drooping branches which hang out of the flower and become gradually thickened and tubular upward, stigmas dilated, notched and often split down one side, dark orange coloured. The mode of collection and preparation of saffron varies in different countries, but it consists essentially in removing the stigmas with the upper part of the style from the other parts of the flower and afterwards drying the parts detached. A not uncommon adulteration of saffron is made by intermixing the dyed stamens of the saffron crocus. It takes from 7000 to 8000 flowers to yield 17½ ounces of fresh saffron which by drying is reduced to 3½.” Medicinal Plants. Bentley and Trimen, IV, 274. In the Waḳịát i Jehángiri, it is asserted that ín an ordinary year, 400 maunds or 3,200 Khurasáni maunds are produced. Half belongs to Government, half to the cultivators and a sér sells for about 10 Rs. A note states that one good grain of saffron contains the stigmata and styles of 9 flowers; hence 4,329 flowers yield one oz.
↩ I conceive the text would be amended
by a different punctuation, viz.,
Kotihár is a perganah according to Vigne and produces the best silk in Kashmir.
↩The Bárá Singha or Kashmír stag. (Cervus Cashmerianus). It is known in Kashmir as the Hanglu, and Vigne describes it as most numerous in Dachhinpárah.
↩This name is retained by Hügel (Travels, p. 135), through apparently not familiar to Vigne (I, 381), who gives it the better known appellation of Martand, situated on the highest part of the Karewah or raised plain between Islámábád and the higher mountains. The temple is described by Hügel as “Koran Pandau,” the beautiful ruins of which are the finest in Kashmír. Vigne inverts the order as Pandu Koru. At 150 yards distance as the Cháh i Bálul or well of Hárút and Márút whose story does not need repetition. The spring referred to in the following paragraph is that of Bawan, one of the holiest in Kashmír, swarming, says Vigne, (I, 359) with Himalayan trout. Hügel gives the legend of the caves one of which he was assured extended 10 kós, and that no one who ever entered, had been known to return. He penetrated to the end of it in a few minutes. Matan is the name of the Karewah at the end of which, according to Moorcroft, the Martand temple stands (II, 255) ascribed like most of the architectural remains to the Pándus.
↩The village of Aish Maḳám or the abode of pleasure, holds in a long building situated conspicuously on the left bank of the Lidar, the shrine of the saint. He directed that a tomb should be erected where his staff should be found, as his body would disappear. It is still missing. See Vigne, II, 6. The text has Ash with a variant Aish.
↩With reference to this name and that of Kháwarpárah Cunningham instances an effect on the nomenclature of the points of the compass caused by difference of creed. By the Hindú who worships the sun, the cardinal points are named with reference to the East, as para, the ‘front’ or earth, to which he turns in his daily morning worship; apara, ‘behind’ or the West, Váma, the ‘left’ hand or North, and dakshina, the ‘right’ hand or the South. By the Muḥammadan who turns to the West or Mecca, these terms are reversed, and ‘Dachin’ which still means the ‘right’ hand in Kashmíri, is now used to denote the North and Káwar on the ‘left’ to denote the South. Thus on the Lidar, there is the subdivision of Dachinpára to the west of the stream, and Káwarpára to the south. On the Behat river also, below Baráhmula, the subdivision of Dachin lies to the north, and that of Káwar to the south of the stream. This change in the meaning of Dachin from south to north must have taken place before the time of Akbar as Abul Fazl describes Dachinpára as situated at the pool of a mountain on the side of Great Tibet, that is to the north of the Lidar. Ancient Geography, India, p. 94.
The Amarnáth cave is marked in Drew's map, south-east of Baltal and Sonamarg, near the sources of the Sind river. Its history and ceremonies are told by Vigne, II, 8. The ice bubble was doubtless a stalactite. See Moorcroft, II, 252.
↩Applied indiscriminately to both agate and onyx. Tieffenthaler describes a stone of their country, as green with white streaks which is worked with diamond powder and made into phials, saucers, hafts of daggers and the like. It is probably a kind of jade.
↩Cucumbers and melons are commonly grown on them. Their construction is described by Moorcroft (II, 138) with the thoroughness which characterizes his observations. The causeway is called by Vigne, (II, 99) Sad i Chodri and is carried entirely through the lake to the village of Isha Bryri, four miles on the opposite side. It more resembled a line of rushes than a causeway in his day.
↩Thad, in the text.
↩In the text Isha balári. I am guided on these names by the Governor of Jammu.
↩Var. Zambíl, Zímbal, Ratíl.
↩Ver. is the old name for Shahábád. A description of this celebrated fountain may be read in Vigne's Kashmir, I, 332, and in Moorcroft, II, 250.
↩Var. Bhawan Send, Bíún Send, Bhu Sendh, Pawan Sendh.
↩This is also mentioned by Ferishta.
↩Vigne calls the cataract, Arabal or Haribal.
↩This appears to be the Kosah Nág of Vigne which he says is pronounced Kausar or Kautsar by the Muḥammadans after the fountain in Paradise.
↩ The text has relegated
The Bráhmans of Kashmír identify this place which Cunningham supposes to be Zukru or Zukur still a considerable village four miles north of the capital, with Jushkapura founded by the Indo-Scythian prince Jushka, a brother of Kanishka and Hushka, p. 101.
↩There are two of this name; one mentioned by Vigne, (II, 170) near Drabogám, the capital of the parganah of Shukru, which is nothing more than a large pond in the forest. He heard nothing of Abul Fazl's legend, on the spot; the other by Moorcroft, (II, 283) who did not actually visit it as it lay out of his route, but describes it as the source of two streams, one taking the direction of the Lala-Koal or Pohru in Kashmír, the other that of Kathae in the Baramula pass.
↩Badu Sháh is Zainu'l Aábidín (Vigne, II. 73).
↩Dr. King informs me that the Aspen (Populus tremula) occurs wild in the N. W. Himalaya. The P. Euphratica of which the leaves are as tremulous as the aspen, is also common in many parts. The former has a more northern range and is found in Siberia and may have been introduced into Kashmír. For the proper names in the text I follow the guidance of the Governor of Jammu.
↩See Vigne, II, 153. The legend of the Lanka islet is given in Muḥammad Aázam's Hist of Kashmír translated by me in the A. S. Journal, XLIX, Part I, 1880.
↩Var. Ahsan.
↩Cunningham alludes to this at p. 102 and adds, ‘The same story is told by Ferishta with the addition of the name of the Rája whom the translator calls Balnát probably a mistake for Láldit, the contracted form of Lalitaditya among the Kashmiris. As the difference of time between this prince and Sikandar is barely 700 years, it is strange that the tradition should preserve a date so much at variance with the chronology of their own native chronicles. ’ His inference of the inaccuracy of the translation is correct. Ferishta has distinctly Lalitadit, and not Balnát, and he places the temple at Táraspur, but P. is the right initial and pronounced by the Kashmíris Poruspúr. (Vigne, II, 148). Parihásapura was built by Rája Lalitaditya who reigned A. D. 723–760. It was, writes Cunningham, situated on the river bank of the Jhelum near the present village of Sumbal. The names in Briggs are frequently incorrect and his version skips whole passages of his author. See also p. 85, Vol. I.
↩Kamráj and Meráj were two large districts into which Kashmír was divided from the earliest times, the former being the north half of the valley below the junction of the Sind with the Jhelum, and the latter the south half, above that junction. Cunningham, p. 94. Vigne calls the village Táragáon (II, 139) the village of the stars. The remains of ancient masonry a fine spring were still to be seen, some of the blocks little inferior in size to those of Martand.
↩Suhoyum in Vigne, (II, 281,) who states that it lies near the village of Nichi Hama in the Parganah of Machiapora at the north-west end of the valley, and that 36 years before his visit an intense heat was found to issue from the spot. The phenomenon has several times occurred, a white smoke being occasionally seen to issue from the ground, but without sulphurous smell or fissures in the soil.
↩Few people can be traced through so long a period in the same place as these whom H. H. Wilson (Moorcroft, II, 266, n.) identifies as the Dáradas of Sanskrit geography, and Daradræ or Daradæ of Strabo. He supposes them to be the Káfirs of the Muḥammadans, though now nominally converted to Islam. The auriferous region of the Dáradas is mentioned by Humboldt (Cosmos II. p. 513. E. C. Otté) who places it either in the Thibetian highlands east of the Bolor chain, west of Iskardo, or towards the desert of Gobi described also as auriferous by Hewen Thsang.
↩A name of Durga as well as of Saraswati. See this name in the description of Kángra under Súbah of Lahore.
↩See p. 17 of this Volume.
↩See p. 58, n.
↩The immemorial tradition in Kashmír considered the whole of the land as the property of the ruler. Of some portions of the khálsah lands the sovereigns divested themselves by grants in jagír for various periods. The Sikhs made a general resumption, ousted the possessors of grants and reduced thousands to destitution. In Moorcroft's time (II, 125) the khálsa lands were let out for cultivation. Those near the city as Sar Kishti, head or upper cultivation, those more remote Pai-Kishti, or foot and lower. When the grain was trodden out, an equal division took place formerly between the farmer and the government, but the latter advanced its demands like it appropriated ⅞ of the Sar-Kishti and ¾ of the P. K. crop. The straw fell generously to the share of the cultivator who was also permitted to steal a portion of his own produce by the overseer,—for a consideration. In the time of Zainu'l Aábidín, the rice crop (the staple) is said to have been 77 lakhs of kharwárs. In Moorcroft's day it was 20, at from 2½ to 6½ Rs. a kharwár. His weight-measures differ from those of Abul Fazl, a kharwár being 16 taraks, a tarak 6 sérs, a sér 20 pals, a pal 3½ Mahomed Shahi rupees, which (the rupee being 173.3 grains) should make the sér nearly 2 pounds. The actual sér was, however, not above one pound avoirdupois, and a kharwár or ass-load was therefore 96 pounds. A horse-load equalled 22 taraks.
↩See pp. 347 and 411 of Vol. I, where further information is given regarding the revenue system, its exactions and the disturbances which led to the Ḳázi's murder.
↩Vol. I, p. 411.
↩Var. 15,330½.
↩I have retained these expressions as they may serve to throw some light on their exact nature. Tamghá has been already defined at p. 57 of this Volume, as being a demand in excess of the land revenue and báj is simply a toll or tax and must here have a somewhat similar application, but there were various other taxes in excess of land revenue, such as Jihát, Sáir Jihát, Farúa'át and others whose nature is defined at p. 58. Elliot discusses the value of the terms at p. 6, Vol. II, of his Races of the North-West Provinces, but he arrives at no determination of their special fiscal significance. The two are, in several instances, found coupled together when remissions of taxation are mentioned and perhaps they were thus employed to express all cesses of whatever kind over and above the land revenue. Tamgha occurs later under Kabul, signifying inland tolls.
↩Lands of which the revenue was the property of the government, not being made over in grants or gifts, Jágír or Inám to any other parties. Also to lands and villages held immediately of government and of which the State is the manager or holder. More generally it was applied to the exchequer under the Muḥammadan administration. It is more usually pronounced Khálsah. Wilson's Gloss.
↩Abul Fazl duplicates the r, but at p. 98 of the text, one MS. gives Maráj which is the usual spelling. The Governor of Jammu says that both forms are in use. Vigne, (I. 272) and Moorcroft, (II. 113) give a list of 36 parganahs. H. H. Wilson the editor of Moorcroft's travels notices that he has omitted some names.
↩Var. eight.
↩Var. Kashmah, and unintelligible variants of Zínah.
↩Further on, a variant gives Bhat, which in Elliot, I, 15?? is one of the classifications of Bráhmans in the Census N.-W. P. for 1865.
↩Var. Ḥáwah or Ḥádah.
↩Var. Káhú.
↩ This must be a mistake for 12, as
16 taraks r??ke a kharwár: in the Arabic
numerals the 2 (
A horse load is 22 taraks.
↩Var. Taik. The Náik are classified in Elliot I, 152, as Bráhmans.
↩Numeral omitted.
↩Var. Rasah, Rínhah, Ratiah.
↩Soérsaman, Súrsaman.
↩Var. Bhakar. Drew confirms the reading Thakor, which is the chief cultivating caste in the hills.
↩Var. Sahah, Sansah, Nakhah.
↩Var. Ahír.
↩Var. Akbari, Khaséri.
↩Var. Kahár.
↩Var. Daneo, Danséo.
↩Var. Khakar, Rínah, Kahikanku Dínah, Kahki Kahku.
↩Gardhan, and Kardhan, in the Gulzár i Kashmír.
↩As some of these names are supplied by the U. T., I append the series in apposition to the dynasties in the text. The series in Tieffenthaler corresponds, and is taken (says a note, apparently by Anquetil du Perron) from a history of Cashmir written by Haidar Maler, A. H. 1027 (A. D. 1607).
Rajas of Cashmír of the line of Curu in the lunar race worshippers of Nágas or snakes.
The Rájá Tarangini whence this line is taken, commences with an account of the dessication of the valley by Casyapa Muni, supposed to allude to the deluge. Wilson, As. Rs. XV, 1.
First period. Caurava race 1266 years.
| B. C. | 3714. | Cashmir colonised by Casyapa. B. C. 2666. W. | |
| Fifty-three princes, names omitted by Hindu writers, but partly supplied by Muḥammadan authority as follows: | |||
| Sulimán. | |||
| Cassalgham. | |||
| Maherkaz. | |||
| Bandu Khán, (Pandu of the lunar line.) | |||
| Lódi Khán. | |||
| Ledder Khán. | |||
| Sunder Khán, Hindú worship established. | |||
| Cunder Khán. | |||
| Sunder Khán. | |||
| Tundu Khán. | |||
| Beddu Khán. | |||
| Mahand Khán. | |||
| Durbinash Khán. | |||
| Deosir Khán. | |||
| Tehab Khán, dethroned by king of Cabul. | |||
| Cálju Khán. | |||
| Luvkhab Khán. | |||
| Shermavaran Khán. | |||
| Naureng Khán, conquered China. | |||
| Barigh Khán. | |||
| Gowasheh Khán. | |||
| Pandu Khán II, extended empire to the sea. | |||
| Haris Khán. | |||
| Sanzil Khán. | |||
| Akber Khán. | |||
| Jaber Khán. | |||
| Nandor Khán. | |||
| Sanker Khán, slain by. | |||
| Bakra Rájá. | |||
| An interval ensues and authentic history commences with | |||
| B. C. | 2448. | Gonerda, I, Kali Yuga, 653. Gonanda or Agnand, a relation of Jarasundha, 1400. Wilson. | |
| Damodara, I. | |||
| Gonerda, II. | |||
| Thirty-five princes; names forgotten. | |||
| ” | 1709. | Lava (Bal-lava) Loo of Muḥammadan historians. | |
| ” | 1664. | Causésaya. | |
| ” | 1660. | Khagendra. | |
| ” | 1600. | Surendra, cot. with Bahman of Persia. | |
| ” | 1575. | Godhara. | |
| ” | 1537. | Suvarna. | |
| ” | 1477. | Janaca. | |
| ” | 1471. | Sachinara. | |
| ” | 1394. | Asoca, established Buddhism. | |
| B. C. | 1332. | Jaloca, adopted castes. | |
| ” | 1302. | Damodara, II, a Saiva: transformed into a snake. | |
| ” | 1277. | Huskha, | Tartar princes, re-established Buddhism. |
| Jushca, | |||
| Canishca, | |||
| ” | 1217. | Abhimanyu, an orthodox Hindu. B. C. 423 W. | |
Second Period, Gonerdiya dynasty, 1013 years, or 378 years after adjustment. (Wilson.) For all these dynasties see Wilson's Essay on the Hindu History of Cashmere, As. Res. XV.
| B. C. | |||
| 1182 | Gonerda III, Nága worship resumed, | B. C. | 388 W. |
| 1147 | Vibíshana, | ” | 370 |
| 1096 | Indrajíta, | B. C. | 352 |
| 1060-6 | Rávana, | ” | 334 |
| 1030-6 | Víbishana II, | ” | 316 |
| 993 | Nara (Kinnara) persecuted Buddhists, | ” | 298 |
| 953-3 | Siddha, | ” | 280 |
| 893-3 | Utpaláxa, | ” | 262 |
| 862-9 | Hiranyáxa, | ” | 244 |
| 825-2 | Hiranyácula, | ” | 226 |
| 765-2 | Váśucula, | ” | 218 |
| 705-2 | Mihirácula, invaded Lanka or Ceylon, | ” | 200 |
| 635-2 | Vaca, | ” | 182 |
| 572-2 | Xitinanda, | ” | 164 |
| 542-2 | Vasunanda, | ” | 146 |
| 490 | Nara II, or Bara, | ” | 128 |
| 430 | Axa (by some said to have built the temple on the Takht i Sulaimán, by others, the following monarch, T.), | B. C. | 100 |
| 370 | Gopaditya, a pious bráhmanist, | ” | 82 |
| 310 | Gokerna, | ” | 64 |
| 253 | Narendraditya, | ” | 46 |
| 216-9 | Yudhisht'hira, surnamed the Blind, | ” | 28 |
| Aditya Dynasty, 192 years. | |||
| 168-9 | Pratápáditya, kinsman of Vicramaditya, | ” | 10 |
| 136-9 | Jalaucas, | ” | 22 |
| 104-9 | Tunjína, a great famine, | ” | 54 |
| 66-9 | Vijaya, | ” | 90 |
| 60-9 | Jayendra, | ” | 98 |
| 23-9 | A´rya Rájá, of miraculous accession, | B. C. | 135 |
| Gonerdiya line restored, 592 years, or 433, adjusted. | |||
| A. D. | ||
| 23-3 | Méghaváhana, invited Bauddhas and invaded Ceylon. | |
| 57-2 | Sreshtaséna, or Pravaraséna. | |
| 87-3 | Hiranya, contention with Toromána Yavaraja, connected with Vicramaditya. | |
| 117-5 | Mátrigupta, Bráhman from Ujjain succeeded by election, | 471 W. |
| 122-2 | Pravaraséna, invaded Siladitya of Gujerát, | 476 |
| 185-2 | Yudhisht'hira II, | 499 |
| 224-5 | Nandrávat, Narendráditya, or Lakshmaná, | 522 |
| 237-5 | Ranáditya, married daughter of Chola Rájá, | 545 |
| 537-5 | Vikramáditya, supposed an interpolation, | 568 |
| 579-5 | Báláditya, last of the Gonerda race, | 592 |
| Nága or Carcota dynasty, 260 years, 5 months. | ||
| 615-5 | Durlabhaverddhana, connected with Yezdijird. | |
| 651-5 | Pratápaditya, founded Pratápapúr. Durlabhaca. | |
| 701-5 | Chandrápíṛa, or Chandranand, a virtuous prince. | |
| 710-1 | Tárápíṛa, a tyrant. | |
| 714-1 | Lalitáditya, conquered Yasovarna of Kanauj (Yasovigraha of inscriptions) and overran India. | |
| 750-8 | Cuvalayápíṛa. | |
| 751-8 | Vajráditya. | |
| 758-8 | Prithivyápíṛa. | |
| 762-10 | Sangramápíṛa. | |
| 769-10 | Jajja, an usurper, deposed by | |
| 772-10 | Jayápíra, married daughter of Jayanta of Gaur, encouraged learning, invaded Bhima Séna of Gujerat; 841. | |
| 803-10 | Lalitápíṛa. | |
| 815-10 | Sangrámápíṛa, II or Prithivyápíṛa. | |
| 822-10 | Vrihaspati, or Chippatajaya, son of a prostitute whose five brothers governed in his name. | |
| 834-10 | Ajitápíṛa, set up by the same usurpers. | |
| 870-10 | Anangápíṛa, restored to succession. | |
| 873-10 | Utpalapíṛa, last of the Carcota race. | |
The text has the ḍa-kár or hard ḍ which is convertible with the Hindi hard ṛ, to which I have ventured to alter it in correspondence with the Hindi pronunciation of these names.
Utpala Dynasty, 84 years, 5 months.
| A. D. | |
| 875-10 | Aditya Varmá, or Avanti Varmá, a severe famine. |
| 904-1 | Sankara Varmá, invaded Gujjara and Rájá Bhoja, Kashmír cycle brought into use. |
| 922-9 | Gopála Varmá, killed youth. Sankata, last of the Varmá race. |
| 924-9 | Sugandhá Ráni, recommended election of |
| 926-9 | Párthá. The Tatris and Ecangas powerful. |
| 941-9 | Nirjita Varmá, also called Pangu, the Cripple. |
| 942-9 | Chakra Varmá, civil wars. |
| 952-9 | Sura Varmá. |
| 953-9 | Párthá, a second time. |
| 954-3 | Chakra Varmá, do. |
| 954-9 | Sancara Vardhana. |
| 956-3 | Chacra Varmá, third time. |
| 957-7 | Unmatti Varmá |
| 955-9 | ´Sura Varmá, II. |
| Last or mixed Dyuasty 64 years, 4 months. | |
| 960-3 | Yasascara Déva, elected sovereign. |
| 969-3 | Sangrama Déva, dethroned and killed by |
| 969-7 | Parvagupta, slain at Suréswari Ketra. |
| 971-3 | Xema Gupta, destroyed many Viharas of Buddhists. |
| 979-9 | Abhimanyu, intrigues and tumult. |
| 993-9 | Nandi Gupta, put to death by his grandmother Diddá. |
| 994-10 | Tribhúvana, shared the same fate. |
| 996-10 | Bhímá Gupta, ditto. |
| 1001-1 | Didá Ráni, assumed the throne, adopts. |
| 1024-7 | Sangráma Déva II. with whom Wilson's list closes. |
| 1032 | Harirájá and A´nanta Déva, his sons (continued from printed Taringini.)1 |
| 1054 | Kalasa. |
| 1062 | Utkarśá, and Harsha Déva. |
| 1062 | Udayama Vikrama, son of the latter. |
| 1072 | Sankha Rájá. |
| 1002 | Salha, grandson of Udayama. |
| 1072 | Susalha, usurper, ditto. |
| 1088 | Mallina, his brother, (end of Kalhana Pandit's list). |
| 1088 | Jaya Sinh, son of Susalha (Jona Rájá's list). |
| 1110 | Paramána. |
| 1119 | Bandi Déva. |
| 1126 | Bopya Déva. |
| 1135 | Jassa Déva, his brother, an imbecile. |
| 1153 | Jaga Déva, son of Bopya. |
| 1167 | Rájá Déva. |
| 1190 | Sangráma Déva, III. |
| 1206 | Ráma Déva. |
| 1227 | Lakhana Déva, adopted. |
| 1261 | Sínha Déva, new line; killed by brother-in-law |
| 1275 | Sínha Déva, II, usurper, himself deposed and killed by the Mlechchas under Rájá Dullach? |
| The Bhota Dynasty. | |
| 1294 | Sri Rinchana, obtained throne by conquest. |
| 1294 | Kota Ráni, his wife. Udyana Déva, second husband. Their minister, Sháh Amír killed the whole family and succeeded as Sri Shamsu'ddín. |
| 18 | Muḥammadan princes succeeded. Names not recorded. |
| Vikhyana Bhatt, overcame the last of these. | |
| 1298? | Jayansara, his son overcome by Sulṭán. |
| 1300 | Alla'uddín, Muḥammad Sháh. |
1 The lengths of reigns only are given in the original; calculating backwards from Aláu'ddín, it becomes necessary to curtail the reign of Harirájá (52 years) by about 30 years to form a natural link with Wilson's date of Sangráma Déva.—Prinsep. I add that the conclusion of this series is incompatible with the fictions even of Hindú Chronology, and though the intervention of 18 Muḥammadan kings be conceded, the term of four years is an extremely undignified allowance for this royal procession. The dates of the Muḥammadan kings is continued from Table LXXV of the U. T. taken apparently from Briggs whose calculations are based on two dates given by Ferishta, viz., that of Sháh Mír's arrival in Kashmír under Sinha Déva, in 715 (A. D. 1315) and the death of Rájá Adin in 747 (1346). According to Ferishta, the latter was succeeded by Kotahdevi who, after a brief opposition to Sháh Mír, espoused him. She was imprisoned the following day and her husband ascended the throne and died after a reign of three years. To his son Jamshíd is allotted 1 year and 2 months. Allowing a year for the brief reign of the Ráni, this would give the accession of Aláu'ddín about A. D. 1351. Ferishta does not give separate dates to each reign as might be inferred from Briggs' digest of his pages. He places the death of Ḳuṭbu'ddín in 796 (A. D. 1393); that of Sikandar the Iconoclast in 819 (1416). Ali Sháh in 826 (1422) and Zain u'l Aábidín in 877 (1472).
↩Death of Ḳuṭbu'ddín 793. Ferishta.
↩Of the length of this reign, Ferishta states he is ignorant, but Briggs makes him ‘led to believe’ that it “must have been nineteen years.”
↩Ferishta, 894–(1488-9).
↩Ferishta gives fifty years for the whole reign of Muḥammad Sháh, which would place the date of his son Shamsu'ddín's accession in 941, (1534); Ferishta is unable to give the length of his reign and omitting mention of Ismạíl, follows it with the accession of Názuk who, after six months gives place to Mirzá Haidar. The Shamsu'ddín of Ferishta, is the father of Názuk, viz., Ibrahím. The series and dates of Ferishta contiuue in the following order:
| Y. | M. | D. | ||
| Názuk, second time, | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| Mirzá Haidar, | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Názuk, third time, | 0 | 10 | 0 | |
| 960-1552. | Ibrahím, son of Názuk (Briggs, brother). | |||
| 963-1555. | Ismạíl, brother of Ibrahím, | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 964-1556. | Habíb, son of Ismạíl, | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Gházi Sháh (Gházi Khán Chak), | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 971-1563. | Husain, brother of Gházi. | |||
| 977-1569. | Ali Sháh Chak. | |||
| 985-1577. | Yusuf Sháh, son of Ali Sháh who abdicated in 995 (1586) in favour of his son Yáḳúb, and in the same year Kashmír was occupied by Akbar and shortly after formally annexed. | |||
A manvantara is the period or age of a Manu, being equal to 12,000 years of the gods, or 4,320,000 years of mortals. Its nature and duration are fully described in H. H. Wilson's Vishnu Purána.
↩See p. 15 of this Vol.
↩According to Tieffenthaler, he was called “Cashapmír, from Cashapa grandson of Brahmá and mér, a mountain or habitation.” Báber mentions in his Memoirs that the hill country along the upper course of the Indus was formerly inhabited by a race called Kás from whom he conjectures that Kashmír received its name. The Kasia regio of Plolemy applies to the race and seems to confirm his conjecture. Kasyapa was the son of Maríchi the son of Brahmá, and was father of Vivaswat the father of Manu. His name signifies a tortoise which form he assumed as Prajapati, the father of all, and had a large share in the work of creation. He was one of the seven great Rishis Dowson.
↩As the 40th year of Akbar's reign is A. H. 1003, commencing 5th Dec. 1594 and ending 25th Nov. 1595 A. D. the date of Ugnand would be B. C. 2449.
↩Shaikh Nizámi, who was born in that town. The lines occur in the Haft Paikar, one of the Khamsah or Five poems of Nizámi. The other four are the Makhzan i Asrár, Khusrau wa Shírín, Laila wa Majnún, and the Sikandar Námah. Some copies have the Khirad Nímah (Aristotle's instructions to Alexander) instead of the Haft Paikar.
↩The origin, history and sects of the Jains are sketched in H. G. Briggs' Cities of Gujarashtara. Prof. Wilson remarks that their faith was introduced into the peninsula about the 7th century A. D.; Col. Sykes thinks about the 4th. It is closely allied to Buddhism, though the Jains assert it to be long anterior. Sir W. Hunter defines Jainism as Buddhism equipped with a mythology of saints and narrowed in its practical aspects from a national religion to suit the exclusive requirements of a sect. According to one view, the Jains are a remnant of the Indian Buddhists who saved themselves from extinction by compromises with Hinduism and erected themselves into a separate caste. Another view represents them as the unbroken succession of the Nigantha sect of the Asoka edicts. The Buddhism of Asoka (244 B. C.) is said to be a later product than the Jain doctrines. The I. G. refers to the modern literature of the subject in Mr. Ed. Thomas' Jainism or the Early faith of Asoka. Mr. Rhys David's article in The Academy of 13th Sept. 1879; and Numismata Orientala (Ceylon fasciculus) pp. 55, 60. (Trübner, 1877.)
↩ In Sanskrit
The old capital previous to the erection of Pravarasénapura is stated to have been founded by Asoka (Ráj Tarangini, i, 104,) (B C. 263–226). It stood on the site of the present Pándrethán and is said to have extended along the bank of the river from the foot of the Takht i Sulaimán to Pántasok, a distance of more than three miles. It was still the capital in the reign of Pravaraséna I, towards the end of the 5th century when the king erected a famous symbol of the god Siva, named after himself Pravareswara. The new capital was built by Pravaraséna, II, in the beginning of the 6th century. Anct. Geog. India, p. 97. Neither the text nor the U. T. mention two homonymous monarchs. This epoch given by Cunningham shows that they must have followed in close succession, and a single name has possibly been by error duplicated.
↩ Such is the literal translation according
to the punctuation of the text
which I suspect is in error. Ferishta
states that Shamsu'ddín abolished the
exactions of his predecessors and having
repaired the ruin, caused by the invasion
and exactions of Dalju, by written
orders fixed the revenue at ⅙th of the
produce. The readings of Gladwin and
the S. ul M. here complete the sentence
and continue, that before he came to
Kashmír, it was revealed to him in a
dream that he should obtain the kingdom.
I have little doubt that this is the
correct division of the sentences. A full
stop should follow
Ferishta relates this circumstance with detail, somewhat curtailed by Briggs.
↩These, states Ferishta, were his father-in-law the Jammú Rájá, and the chief of Rajauri, who dissuaded him from abandoning his authority and abdicating in favour of his brother. Finding that without their help, his restoration could not be effected they reinstated him by force.
↩According to Ferishta Jasrat Shaikha Ghakar imprisoned by Timur in Samarkand, escaped and founded or acquired a principality in the Punjáb. Zainu'l Aábidín with his aid defeated Ali Sháh who, according to one account was taken prisoner by Jasrat, and to another was expelled from Kashmír by his successful brother. Mention of Jasrat occurs in Ferishta under Bahlol Lodi, and Zainu'l Aábidín, he says, on his accession fitted out an army under Jasrat for the conquest of Delhi and the Punjáb. Unable to cope with Bahlol Lodi at Delhi, he, however, possessed himself of the Punjáb. This freebooter gave considerable trouble to the Sayyid dynasty and held his own against Bahlol Lodi when that chief governed Multan under Sayyid Muhammad. See Vol. I, 456, n. for the Gakkhars (as it is there spelt) and the reference to Delmerick's history of this tribe.
↩Ferishta says that for the encouragement of the study of medicine, he specially favoured Sri Bhat an eminent physician, by whose advice, the Bráhmans, expelled under Sikander the Ironoclast, were recalled. Briggs has been too sparing in his extracts of this reign of the most celebrated among Moslem monarchs of Kashmír. Wearied with his long task, the gaps are greater as he approaches its completion.
↩The Delhi governor of the Punjáb and the country at the foot of the hills. Briggs mistranslates his author here, and makes Tátár Khán penetrate into Jammu and sack Siálkot, whereas Ferishta says that the Kashmír troops, under Malik Bari Bhat fought Tátár Khán, ravaged his country and plundered Siálkót.
↩Ferishta places the accession of Fatḥ Sháh in A. H. 894 (A. D. 1488-9), about which time occurred the arrival of Sháh Kásim son of Sayyid Muḥammad Núr Baksh, and the establishment of his doctrines as the prevailing creed. All religious grants and places of worship were made over to this sect, among the most illustrious converts to which were the Chak tribe. Their proselytes were very numerous, but the esoteric doctrines of Mír Shamsu'ddín being beyond the comprehension of some of them, on the death of this apostle, they fell into heresy or reverted to paganism. Briggs ornaments his page with the ceremony and explanation of the “cup of grace” given to the proselytes. It may be true, but Ferishta does not allude to it.
↩He was the son of Ibrahím Mákri who was minister in chief to Muḥammad Sháh during his second reign. Abdál Mákri his son played a considerable part in the stirring events of this time and was eventually driven from court by the intrigues of the minister Malik Káji. He went to India and incited Báber to the conquest of Kashmír. Fearing that the inhabitants would be opposed to the foreign rule of the Mughals, the enthronement of Názuk the son of Ibrahím was adopted as a pretext to conciliate the Kashmíris, who, on his instalment in authority, dismissed the troops of Báber with conciliatory gifts.
↩Brother of the Emperor, governor of Kabul and Ḳandahár, to whom Humáyún had ceded the government of the Punjáb and the Indus frontier.
↩See Vol. I, pp. 460-1, for a slight notice of this historian, poet, and prince who governed Kashmír for ten years. The events of his reign are condensed by Briggs under the name of the impotent Názuk, who is as unworthy of the preference as are the reasons by which Briggs, against the authority of Ferishta, supports it.
↩Vár. Kíór, Kanór. T. Katour. G. Kinore. Erskine says (p. 144) that Kattor or Katár is a place of note in the Kafiristán country, but in the maps Kunar occupies a corresponding position.
↩“The Gakar chiefs hold the lower valley of the Jhelum and the upper course of the Haro river to the S. W. of Kashmír. They are all Muḥammadans, but their conversion is comparatively recent as their names were Indian down to the invasion of Timur. Their occupation of these districts is of very early date; but they are Turanians and not Arians, as none but a Gakar will intermarry with a Gakar, a practice repugnant to Hinduism which permits no man to marry one of his own tribe. They also occupy several portions of the E. Doáb, as Guliána near Gujar Khán, and Bugiál under the lofty hill of Balnáth. But these districts do not properly belong to the hills, although they were subject to Kashmír at the time of Hwen Thsang's visit in the seventh century.” Anct. Geog. Ind. p. 132.
↩ I would amend the punctuation of
the text, placing a stop after
By Káshghar cannot be meant the well-known town of E. Turkestán which is too far removed, but Chitral or Káshkar, which, according to Erskine, (Báber's Memoirs) is a corruption of Káshghar with the territory of which it was long included, the name having survived the dominion. The Kasia or Akhassa regio of Ptolemy beyond Mount Imaus has perhaps given its name to both Káshghar and Kashmír.
↩Var. Sarjani, Sarkháni.
↩Var. Malandari, Makandari; a marginal gloss has Bulandi. Vol. I, p. 344, Balandri. Kotal signifies the crest of a defile.
↩This name is said by Cunningham (p. 29) to signify “the city” par excellence and is applied to 3 other ancient sites near Kábul, Jalálábád and Pesháwar. Masson derives the name from the Turki bi or be “chief” and the Hind grám, a hybrid to which Cunningham prefers the simpler Sanscrit prefix in vi??ráma.
↩ Var.
This was the capital of Udyána, the Sanskrít name for the modern districts of Panjkora, Bajaur, Swát and Bunér. It is mentioned by Hwen Thsang as Mung-kie-li or Mangala, probably the Mangora of Wilford's surveyor and the Manglora of General Court's map. It was about 2¼ miles in circuit and very populous. Anct. Geog. Ind. p. 82.
↩Var. Malkand, Sher Khán; Malik Ranj or Ríkh.
↩Erskine states that Kúner and Núrgil form another Tumán situated in the midst of Kafiristán which forms its boundary. Núrgil, says Báber, lies on the west and Kúner on the east of the Cheghán sarái or Kámeh river, p. 143.
↩ The text is here in the hesitancy of
uncertain readings and makes fact or
sense of none. Báber removes the
doubt. The word
Var. Jílán, but Báber confirms Khutlán. Hamadáni, he says, died one farsang higher up than Kúner, and his disciples carried him to Khutlán. A mausoleum is erected on the spot where he died and in the year 920 (1514) Báber circumambulated his tomb, near which are groves of orange and citron, p. 144.
↩See Elphinstone's Cabul. App. C. p. 617.
↩I am indebted to the critical acumen of Pandit Radha Kishan, governor of Jammu, for his ingenious emendation of the faulty text. The two first names of the three are jumbled together into one with a misplacement of the diacritical points in all the variants. The alteration required to clear the difficulty was simple, but its simplicity unobserved, as is usually the case, until after the discovery. Isakhail is still a tahsíl of Banu district, and Daur is independent territory. The country which the Isakhail, according to Baber, shared with the Keráni, Kivi, Súr and Niázi Afgháns, has Chaupárah and the Indus to the south, Dínkót on the east, and on the west the Desht, called also Bázár and Ták. After the sack of Kohát, Baber attacked the Isakhails who fled to the Chaupárah hills, and following them up stormed their sangars. See p. 160. But all through his operations in Banu, Báber uses W. for S. and the other points of the compass accordingly. Hence we have on the E. Chaupárah and Sind, Dinkot on the N. and Desht or Damán on the S. Erskine.
↩See Vol. I, p. 381. Its limits are defined by Erskine, (p 152), within Herat on the west, Farah on the south and Ghor on the east, and the reader is referred to Silvestre de Saci's Mines de l'Orient., Vol. I, p. 321 for a learned dissertation on its position.
↩See Vol. I, p. 35. Erskine's note on the tumán (p. 61) is at fault through his not knowing its varying local values which would account for the diverse reckonings of Tavernier, Chardin and Della Valle. Mandelsloe must be wrong in making the zecchin = 9 rupees, nearly double its gold value in silver at a time when the rate for the conversion of the rupee was as in Akbar's day, 8 or 9 to the £.
↩Var. 170. Properly, long. 65° 30' E., lat. 31° 37' N.
↩Ḳandahár is in a plain on the left bank of the Arghandáb which falls into the Dorí, a tributary of the Helmund. It is separated from the Arghandáb by a range of mountains.
↩Var. Tanil, Tabsal, Batsal, Bansaníl, Bambal.
↩See Vol. I, Geog. Index for this tract as Garmsir and under Dáwar, and Elphinstone. Cábul. pp. 136-137.
Zamín Dáwar lies west of the Helmand below the hills or as Erskine defines it elsewhere, on the right bank of the Helmand reaching from Jirbesha under the Hazára hills to the Helmand.
↩Var. and G. safédtari. I am disposed to think the marginal reading correct and that it signifies white crops in contradistinction to the sabzbari or green crops that follow lower down, though it is not easy to see why rice should be relegated to the green, rather than the white class. There are, however, two kinds of sháli rice, the white requiring deep water and the red needing only a moist soil.
↩ I read
See p. 36, Vol. I.
↩ Under the Caliphs, the land-tax was
usually rated at ⅖ of the produce of
wheat and barley if the fields were
watered by public canals;