Containing 48 Mahals, 7,126,107 Bíghas, 17 Biswas. Revenue 123,012,590 Dáms. Suyúrghál 10,990,260 Dáms. Castes various. Cavalry, 4000. Infantry 23,980.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Islámábád Pákal, has a stone fort on a hill, | 970,67-19 | 1,779,407 | 31,462 | 50 | 1000 | Rájpút Sánd. |
| A´ḍhah, | 14,912-8 | 513,081 | 45,420 | 20 | 200 | Ahír. |
| Pánipat, has a brick fort, | 568,444 | 10,756,647 | 3,540,632 | 100 | 2000 | Afghán, Gújar, Ranghar.1 |
| Pálam, | 245,240 | 5,726,787 | 1,231,880 | 70 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Baran, has a brick fort on the Káli Nadi, | 171,160 | 3,907,928 | 153,190 | 20 | 300 | . |
| Bághpat, on the Jumna, between two streams, | 200,515 | 3,532,368 | 180,259 | 20 | 200 | Chauhán, Bráhman. |
| Palwal,1 has a brick fort and it stands on a mound, | 234,783 | 1,769,493 | 218,225 | 25 | 500 | Rájpút., Gújar. |
| Barnáwah, | 145,000 | 1,379,125 | 50,759 | 25 | 200 | Shaikhzádah. |
| Púth, has a brick fort, | 48,191 | 621,749 | 7,243 | 60 | 600 | Toṇwar (Tuar). |
| Béri Dobalḍhan, | 119,002-19 | 1,404,225 | . | 40 | 800 | Jat. |
| Tilpat, has a brick fort, | 119,578 | 3,077,913 | 92,583 | 40 | 400 | Bráhman, Rájpút, Gújar. |
| Tándah Bhagwán (Tándah Phugánah) on the Jumna, | 51,669 | 1,289,306 | 11,366 | 25 | 200 | Afghán, |
| Tilbégampúr, | 14,237-7 | 370,374 | 15,754 | 10 | 100 | Jat. |
| Jhajhar, | 128,417 | 1,422,451 | 306,461 | 60 | 1000 | Afghán, Jat. |
| Jhársah, has a stone fort in
the village of Dhánah
built, by Sulṭán Firoz on
the banks of the |
87,923 | 3,605,228 | 176,079 | 60 | 600 | Baḍgújar. |
| Jéwar, | 133,746 | 1,878,378 | 85,439 | 40 | 400 | Rájpút, Chhókar.3 |
| Jhinjhánah, | 57,923-16 | 1,700,250 | 100,250 | 20 | 300 | Jat. |
| Chaprauli, stands between two streams | 32,701-12 | 1,138,759 | 5,719 | 20 | 300 | Do. |
| Jalálábád, stands between two streams amid much forest | 96,189 | 1,333,711 | 9,099 | 50 | 600 | Do. |
| Jalálpúr Barwat,4 much forest | 42,061-17 | 1,001,875 | 1,775 | 20 | 400 | Do. |
| The old suburban district, | 128,417 | 1,422,451 | 306,460 | 10 | 40 | Jat, Chauhán. |
| The new do. do. | 36,447 | 3,635,315 | 595,984 | 25 | 300 | Gújar, Jat, Ahír. |
| The metropolis of Delhi, | 971 | 736,406 | 18,783 | 135 | 1,500 | . |
| Dásnah, between Ganges and Jumna, | 282,777 | 4,933,310 | 162,535 | 60 | 300 | Ghelót (here some illegible words.) |
| Dádri Ṭáhá, | 179,789 | 4,326,059 | 118,577 | 20 | 400 | Afghán, Jat. |
| Dankaur, on the Jumna, | 128,523 | 1,016,682 | 4,340 | 20 | 200 | Gújar. |
| Rohtak, has a brick fort, | 636,835 | 8,599,270 | 428,000 | 100 | 2,000 | Jat. |
| Sonipat (Sonpat) has a brick fort, | 283,299 | 7,727,323 | 775,105 | 70 | 1,000 | Afghán, Jat, |
| Safídún, has a brick fort, | 81,730 | 1,975,596 | 99,647 | 60 | 600 | Rájpút Ranghar, Jat. |
| Sikandarábád, | 66,907-15 | 1,259,190 | 17,844 | 50 | 400 | Bháti, Gújar. |
| Saráwah, has a brick fort, | 42,387-12 | 1,583,899 | 31,914 | 40 | 300 | |
| Sentah1 | 39,147-9 | 854,191 | 48,207 | 30 | 300 | Chauhán. |
| Siyánah, between two streams | 166,407-17 | 849,090 | 4,959 | 50 | 400 | Taga.2 |
| Shakarpúr | 52,139 | 2,111,996 | 780,305 | 70 | 200 | Chauhán. |
| Karnál, the stream Sánjauli flows below the town | 540,444 | 5,678,242 | 207,999 | 50 | 800 | Ranghar Chauhán. |
| Ganaur, has a brick fort | 40,990-16 | 1,718,792 | 33,390 | 20 | 400 | Tagá. |
| Gaṛh Muktesar, has a brick fort on the Jumna, a Hindu place of pilgrimage | 101,340-10 | 1,591,492 | 41,490 | 40 | 400 | Rájput, Musal mán, Hindu. |
| Kutánah, | 91,706-13 | 1,423,779 | 892 | 20 | 150 | Jat. |
| Kándhlah, | 68,934-5 | 1,374,430 | 37,930 | 20 | 30 | Gújar. |
| Kásnah, on the Jumna | 104,021-19 | 1,522,315 | 149,250 | 40 | 400 | Do. |
| Kharkkandah, | 51,895-15 | 1,105,856 | 4,958 | 50 | 600 | Afghán, Jat. |
| Gangér Khérah, (E. Gangérú has a brick fort between two streams | 11,062-15 | 316,405 | 13,830 | 40 | 300 | Sayyid. |
| Lóni, has a brick fort between two streams | 75,363 | 3,278,878 | 148,445 | 20 | 200 | |
| Mírath (Meerut) has a brick fort between two streams. | 610,422 | 4,391,996 | 331,096 | 100 | 300 | Tagá, Ránghár, Chandrál1. |
| Mándáuthi, the autumn harvest abundant: near the town a tank with is never dry thoughout the year. | 90,464 | 2,858,223 | 2,934 | 30 | 500 | Jat. |
| Masạúdábád, has an old brick fort | 89,478 | 2,809,156 | 269,319 | 30 | 30 | Do. |
| Hastinápúr, on the Ganges: an ancient Hindu settlement, | 176,340 | 4,466,904 | 36,291 | 20 | 300 | Tagá. |
| Hápúr, on the Káli Nadi between two streams, | 239,845 | 2,103,589 | 5,229 | 4 | 300 | Do. |
Containing 13 Mahals. 8,093,850 Bíghas, 10 Biswas. Revenue 34,817,063 Dams. Suyúrghál. 457,181 Dáms. Castes various. Cavalry, 2,850. Infantry, 26,700.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Ajáoṇ, | 82,467-17 | 1,362,867 | . | 500 | 3000 | Chauhán. |
| Aoṇlah, | 14,701 | 690,620 | . | 50 | 400 | Káṇwar.2 |
| Badáoṇ with suburban district, | 658,320-5 | 7,357,571 | 287,986 | 50 | 5000 | Shaikhzádah, Káyath. |
| Baréli, | 661,227 | 12,507,434 | 91,320 | 1000 | 10,000 | Rájpút. |
| Barsar, | 196,700 | 2,147,824 | 6,754 | 50 | 500 | Káyath. |
| Paund, (Elliot Púnar.) | 5,749 | 260,840 | . | 50 | 300 | Kahór! |
| Talhi,3 (Balhati), | 25,982 | 1,077,811 | 1,505 | 50 | 1000 | Tagá, Bráhman. |
| Sahiswan, | 253,120 | 2,493,898 | 15,444 | 100 | 2000 | |
| Sanás Mandeh, (E. Satási Mundiyá), | 58,110 | 795,315 | 3,471 | 50 | 500 | Tagá, Bráhman. |
| Suneyá, | 29,753 | 1,315,725 | . | 50 | 500 | Ulús.? |
| Kániṭ, | 55,584 | 2,439,369 | 48,444 | 300 | 2000 | Báchhal. |
| Kóṭ Sálbáhan, has a fort: | 227,500-8 | 1,219,165 | . | 50 | 500 | Kaṇwár.2 |
| Gólah, | 24,540 | 1,136,931 | 4,257 | 100 | 1000 | Dewak.’ Báchhal. |
Containing 21 Mahals. The revenue of 5 Mahals undetermined. 16 Mahals, in money. 40,437,700 Dáms. Castes various. Cavalry, 3000. Infantry, 50,000.
| Revenue D. | Revenue D. | ||
| Au´dan,1 | 400,000 | Jakrám, | 5,000,000 |
| Bhúksi and Bháksá, 2 Mahals, | 400,000 | Jaríyah, | 3,000,000 |
| Bastwah, | 200,000 | Jáwan, | 2,500,000 |
| Pachótar, | 400,000 | Chauli, Sahajgar,2 Guzarpúr,3 | |
| Bhíkan Diwár, | 200,000 | Dwárahkót, | . |
| Bhakti, | 11,000,000 | Malwárah,4 | 2,500,000 |
| Bhúri, undetermined, | . | Maláchór, Sítachór, Kémús, | |
| Ratílá,5 | 10,025,000 | 3 Mahals, | 5,137,700 |
| Chanki,6 | 400,000 |
Containing 47 Mahals. 4,047,193 Bighas, 2 Biswas. Reveuue. 66,941,431 Dáms. Suyúrghál 2,892,394 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 4,375. Infantry, 31,550. Elephants, 50.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Elephants. | Castes. | |
| Amróhah, | 320,654 | 6,342,000 | 993,358 | 1000 | 5000 | 50 | Sayyid. |
| Aa´zampúr, | 55,467 | 2,389,478 | 137,544 | 30 | 300 | . | Tagá. |
| Islámpúr Bharú, | 66,096 | 1,370,640 | 12,133 | 100 | 200 | . | Baishnavi. |
| U´jhári, | 125,221 | 697,609 | 2,788 | 20 | 200 | . | Jat. |
| Akbarábád, | 53,790-14 | 640,264 | 27,360 | 50 | 200 | . | |
| Islámpúr Dargú, | 11,217-10 | 429,675 | 675 | 20 | 200 | . | |
| Islámábád, | 25,261-10 | 346,348 | 6,394 | 50 | 500 | . | Jat. |
| Bijnaur, | 60,362 | 3,355,465 | 18,154 | 60 | 500 | . | Tagá, Brahman. |
| Bachharáoṇ, | 115,226-12 | 828,322 | 3,632 | 50 | 300 | . | Tagá. |
| Birói, | 15,027-12 | 150,000 | . | 25 | 100 | . | Kóhi. |
| Bisárá, | 3,003-7 | 200,000 | . | 25 | 100 | . | Khasia.1 |
| Chándpúr | 87,273 | 431,071 | 259,959 | 50 | 200 | . | Tagá, Jat, &c. |
| Jalálábád, | 49,393 | 1,470,072 | 12,263 | 25 | 100 | . | Jat. |
| Chauplah, (T. and var. Chaupálah), | 1,016,199 | 1,340,812 | . | 100 | 500 | . | Gaur. |
| Jhálú, | 26,795 | 237,809 | 34,916 | 50 | 400 | . | Jat. |
| Jadwár, | 76,757-19 | 828,346 | . | 50 | 200 | . | Baḍgújar. |
| Suburban district of Sambhal, | 206,450 | 3,322,448 | 143,739 | 100 | 500 | . | Tagá, Bráhman, &c. |
| Deorah, | 96,965 | 1,924,837 | . | 25 | 200 | . | |
| Dhakah (Elliot Dhákah), | 130,158-16 | 670,364 | 6,487 | 25 | 200 | . | Rahés. |
| Dabhársi, | 82,692-11 | 280,306 | . | 25 | 200 | . | |
| Dúdílah, | 30,130-15 | 210,000 | . | 20 | 100 | . | Kóhi. |
| Rájpúr, | 189,390 | 700,000 | . | 50 | 400 | . | Rájput |
| Rájabpúr, | 40,346-9 | 612,977 | 2,288 | 25 | 150 | . | Kókar. Shaikhzádah. |
| Sambhal, has a brick fort, | 46,400 | 850,953 | 63,404 | 50 | 400 | . | Khokhar.2 |
| Seohárah, | 27,945 | 1,333,732 | 1,418 | 50 | 300 | . | Tagá. |
| Sirsí, | 52,400-11 | 958,769 | 152,314 | 20 | 200 | . | Sayyid, &c. |
| Sahanspúr, | 54,844-10 | 944,304 | 1,038 | 50 | 400 | . | Tagá. |
| Súrsáwah, | 37,502 | 308,065 | . | 15 | 400 | . | Kaurawah. |
| Shérkót, | 19,870 | 4,921,051 | 218,157 | 100 | 1000 | . | |
| Sháhi, | 80,417 | 900,496 | 472 | 20 | 200 | . | Gaur. |
| Kundarki, | 86,164 | 674,936 | 74,936 | 50 | 400 | . | Káyath. |
| Kiratpúr, | 80,973 | 2,410,609 | 166,218 | 100 | 500 | . | Tagá, Jat. |
| Kachh, | 99,868 | 1,248,995 | 5,765 | 20 | 200 | . | |
| Gandáur, | 18,576-17 | 751,520 | 34,270 | 30 | 200 | . | Taga. |
| Kábar, | 33,232-7 | 566,539 | 16,019 | 50 | 400 | . | Chauhán. |
| Ganaur, | 51,005-1 | 267,919 | 17,719 | 10 | 100 | . | Musalmán. |
| Khánkari, | 31,546-7 | 200,000 | . | 10 | 100 | . | |
| Lakhnór, | 246,440 | 2,499,208 | 32,983 | 1000 | 5000 | . | Gaur. |
| Líswah, | 1,871 | 100,000 | . | 10 | 100 | . | |
| Mughalpúr, | 168,374 | 3,580,300 | 80,300 | 100 | 500 | . | Tagá. |
| Manjhaulah, (E. Majhaulah), | 142,461 | 1,737,556 | 6,970 | 400 | 8000 | . | Baḍgújar. |
| Mandáwar, | 65,710 | 1,256,995 | 20,455 | 25 | 300 | . | Bais. |
| Nadínah, (Elliot Nagínah), | 99,233 | 2,647,242 | 284,368 | 50 | 500 | . | Ahír. |
| Nahtaur, in this parganah, the mulberry grows in great perfection of size and sweetness—a span in length,1 | 35,974-12 | 1,738,160 | 4,675 | 50 | 300 | . | Tagá. |
| Neodhanah, | 209,620-10 | 904,675 | . | 100 | 500 | . | Gaur. |
| Naróli, | 181,621 | 1,408,093 | 43,212 | 50 | 400 | . | Baḍgújar. |
| Hatamnah, | 5,706-14 | 250,000 | . | 50 | 400 | . | Kódar. |
Containing 36 Mahals. 3,530,370 Bíghas, 3 Biswas. Revenue, 87,839,659 Dáms. Suyúrghal 4,991,485 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 3,955. Infantry, 22,270.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Elephants. | Castes. | |
| Indri, has a brick fort near the Jumna, | 143,900-28 | 7,078,326 | 691,903 | 50 | 1000 | . | Ranghar, Tagá. |
| Ambihtah, | 17,764 | 324,560 | . | 20 | 300 | . | Gújar, A´ạwán.2 |
| Budhánah, | 155,633 | 3,698,041 | 131,780 | 40 | 300 | . | Tagá, Jat |
| Bídauli, | 111,226 | 3,115,125 | 1,400,255 | . | . | . | Sayyid. |
| Bahatkanjáwar, | 173,471 | 2,676,407 | 146,749 | 50 | 500 | . | Tagá Bárhah. |
| Bhógpúr, has a brick fort on the Ganges, a Hindi place of worship, | 94,428 | 2,338,120 | 6,941 | 100 | 1000 | . | Rájpút Sarír. |
| Púrchapár, | 86,949 | 2,191,460 | 120,438 | 20 | 200 | . | |
| Bhúnah, (Elliot Bhúmah), | 67,451 | 2,135,496 | 28,453 | 2000 | 7000 | . | Sayyid. |
| Baghrá, | 50,390 | 1,913,196 | 74,840 | 30 | 200 | . | Jat. |
| Bhanáṭh, | 49,288 | 1,321,440 | 8,650 | 20 | 200 | . | Tagá. |
| Thánah Bhím, | 281,377 | 3,578,540 | 317,360 | 20 | 500 | . | Rajpút, Sadbár. |
| Tughlaḳpúr, | 81,856 | 222,277 | 128,853 | 20 | 30 | . | Jat. |
| Jaurási, | 211,751 | 2,471,277 | 71,297 | 20 | 200 | . | Bídar. |
| Jauli, | 45,653 | 1,310,057 | 152,396 | . | . | . | Sayyid, (Cavalry entered under Sarót.) |
| Chartháwal, | 35,916 | 1,668,882 | 68,872 | 20 | 200 | . | Tagá. |
| Suburban district of Saháranpúr, has a brick fort cloths of the kinds, Kháṣah and Chautár (Vol. I, p. 94) are here made in perfection, | 212,335-16 | 6,951,545 | 706,448 | 100 | 800 | . | Afghán, Kulál, Tagá. |
| Deoband, has a brick fort, | 335,861 | 6,477,977 | 641,946 | 60 | 300 | . | Gújar, Tagá. |
| Rámpúr, | 79,419 | 1,777,908 | 78,597 | 50 | 400 | . | Sadbár, Tagá. |
| Rurki, | 2,768 | 1,628,360 | 8,361 | 25 | 200 | . | Rájpút, Sadbár,1 Tagá, Brahman. |
| Ráepúr Tátár, | 4,688-8 | 369,080 | . | 10 | 200 | . | Tagá. |
| Síkri Bhukarhéri, | 183,211 | 3,003,611 | 110,611 | 40 | 200 | . | Jat. |
| Sarsáwah, has a brick fort, | 106,300 | 2,516,125 | 16,165 | 30 | 200 | . | Tagá. |
| Sarót, | 90,617 | 2,207,779 | 51,571 | 50 | 1000 | . | Do. |
| Sirdhanah, | 113,780 | 1,590,606 | 43,342 | 30 | 300 | . | Tagá, Ahír. |
| Sambalhérá,2 | 31,963 | 1,011,078 | 11,078 | . | . | . | Sayyid (Cav. entered under Bhonah.) |
| Sóranpalri, | 10,648 | 574,320 | 22,628 | 40 | 250 | . | Jat. |
| Khatáuli, | 104,747 | 3,624,588 | 190,919 | 40 | 300 | . | Tagá, Kulál. |
| Khódi, | 85,618 | 2,514,673 | 58,906 | 50 | 400 | . | Jat, Tagá |
| Kairánah, | 71,245 | 2,025,238 | 223,579 | 20 | 200 | . | Gújar. |
| Gangoh, | 52,137 | 2,029,032 | 322,515 | 300 | 2000 | . | Turkomán. |
| Lakhnauti, | 79,694 | 1,796,058 | 76,602 | 300 | 2000 | . | Do. |
| Muzaffarábád, | 81,305-15 | 4,074,064 | 71,899 | 20 | 200 | . | Ranghar, Sandér.3 |
| Manglaur, has a brick fort, | 60,987 | 2,350,311 | 197,266 | 40 | 300 | . | Bráhman, Baḍgújar. |
| Malhaipúr, | 81,010 | 2,244,070 | 23,077 | 100 | 500 | . | Afghán, Tagá, Bráhman. |
| Nakór, | 65,612-10 | 1,387,070 | 26,104 | 40 | 300 | . | Afghán, Bráhman. |
| Nánautah, | 29,224 | 724,153 | 18,684 | 40 | 300 | . | Afghán. |
Containing 12 Mahals. 1,155,011 Bíghas, 10 Biswas. Suyúrghal. 739,268 Dáms. Revenue * * * *. Cavalry, 2,175. Infantry, 14,600.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Báwal, | 110,375 | 4,114,753 | 16,274 | 100 | 2001 | Rájpút, Ahír, Jat. |
| Pátaúdhi, | 61,970 | 2,270,080 | 5,260 | 50 | 500 | Do. Do. |
| Bhóharah, (E. Bhorah) | 38,547 | 755,543 | 345 | 100 | 1000 | Ahír. |
| Táorú, has a brick fort, | 35,858 | 986,228 | 51,573 | 50 | 500 | Musalmán, Khaildár.1 |
| Réwári with sub. dist.; has a brick fort, | 405,108 | 11,906,847 | 404,100 | 400 | 2000 | Ṭhaṭhar, Ahir, Jat. |
| Ratái Jatái, | 52,120 | 289,603 | 523 | . | 400 | |
| Kóṭ Ḳásim Ali, | 80,410 | 3,357,930 | 110,330 | 25 | 400 | Rájpút, Ahír. |
| Ghelót, | 27,270-10 | 656,688 | . | 700 | 2000 | Rájpút Ṭhaṭhar. |
| Kohánah, | 15,264 | 421,440 | . | 50 | 500 | Do. Do. |
| Suhnah, has a stone fort on a hill; here a hot spring and Hindu shrine, | 251,738 | 3,928,364 | 150,563 | 200 | 2000 | Do. Do. |
| Nímránah, has a stone fort on a hill, | 35,047 | 682,259 | . | 500 | 4000 | Various. |
(Hissár).
Containing 27 Mahals. 3,114,497 Bíghas. Revenue, 52,554,905 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 1,406,519 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 6,875. Infantry, 60,800.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Agrówah (var. Agróhah). Game of all kinds abounds. Sport chiefly hawking, | 45,717 | 1,743,970 | 6,654 | 200 | 2000 | Jáṭú,3 Jat. |
| Ahroni, | 19,537 | 857,357 | 160,033 | 100 | 1000 | Gújar, Jat. |
| Aṭkherah, has a brick fort, and a Hindu temple called Govardhan,1 | 32,991 | 1,576,200 | . | 200 | 2000 | Jat, Toṇwár. |
| Bhangiwál, | . | 1,800,000 | . | 200 | 2000 | Rájput, Ráthór, Jat, Púnya.2 |
| Puniyáṇ, | . | 1,200,000 | . | 150 | 3000 | Jat, Punyaṇ. |
| Bhárangi, | . | 880,832 | . | 200 | 2000 | Ráṭhór, Jat. |
| Barwálah, | 136,799 | 1,097,807 | 109,052 | 100 | 1500 | Sayyid, Malikzádah, Baḳḳál. |
| Bhatú,3 | . | 440,280 | . | 50 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Barwá, | 6,254 | 64,680 | . | 25 | 300 | Játú, Jat. |
| Bhatnér has a brick fort, | 15,683 | 933,042 | . | 500 | 10,000 | Ráṭhór, Rájpút. |
| Tohánah, Do. | 180,744 | 4,694,354 | 150,680 | 400 | 3000 | Afghán, Loháni. |
| Toshám, | 511,075 | 1,068,548 | 2,686 | 200 | 1000 | Ráṭhór, Rajpút, Jat. |
| Jínd, 3 miles from the town in the village of Pandárah, is a Hindú temple, | 281,584 | 5,401,749 | 123,080 | 500 | 4000 | Sálár, Rájpút, Jáṭú. |
| Jamálpúr, the Ghaggar flows through several villages here, | 142,455 | 4,277,461 | 81,461 | 700 | 400 | Toṇwar, Jat. |
| Hisár (Hissár) with sub. dist. has 2 forts, one of brick, one of stone, | 176,512-18 | 4,039,895 | 183,879 | 500 | 2000 | Jáṭú, Ranghar, Sowárán (Sheoran), Sángwán.4 |
| Dhátarat, has a brick fort, | 29,207-18 | 978,027 | 45,556 | 100 | 2000 | Jat, Afghán. |
| Sirsá, do. | 258,355 | 4,361,368 | 163,104 | 500 | 5000 | Júnah (note Johiya). |
| Seorán, | . | 400,000 | . | 100 | 1000 | Jat, Seoṛán (Sheoram.) |
| Sídhmukh, soil mostly sand, | . | 171,372 | . | 50 | 500 | Rájpút, Ráṭhór, Jat. |
| Sewáni, | 48,512 | 76,750 | . | 100 | 1000 | Rájpút, Jáṭú. |
| Shánzdah Dihát (sixteen villages) | 29,740 | 960,111 | 12,586 | 200 | 1500 | Rájpút, Toṇwar. |
| Fatḥábád, has a brick fort, | 33,661 | 1,184,392 | 81,867 | 200 | 3000 | Rájpút, Ráṭhór, Gújar, Jat. |
| Gohánah, | 68,951 | 2,876,115 | 16,146 | 300 | 3000 | Jat, |
| Khándah, here a large tank in which the Hindús think it auspicious and holy to bathe, | 19,438 | 1,119,364 | 47,978 | 100 | 2000 | Jat, Gadi (var. Kari.) |
| Muhim, has a brick fort (an illegible sentence follows in one MS.) | 188,080 | 4,958,613 | 84,202 | 700 | 2000 | Rájpút, Toṇwar, Jat. |
| Hánsi, has a brick fort, | 836,115 | 5,434,438 | 130,056 | 500 | 7000 | Rájpút, Multáni, Jáṭú, Jat. |
Containing 33 Mahals, 7,729,466 Bíghas, 7 Bíswas. Revenue, 160,790,549 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 11,698,330. Castes, various. Cavalry, 9,225. Infantry, 55,700.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Ambálah, | 154,769 | 4,198,094 | 321,488 | 100 | 1000 | . |
| Banór, | 420,337 | 12,549,953 | 1,087,209 | 700 | 3000 | Ranghar, Afghán. |
| Páél, has a brick fort, | 525,932 | 7,322,260 | 162,267 | 200 | 2000 | Ranghar, Jat. |
| Bhódar (Bhadór), | 86,877 | 3,103,269 | 1,406,106 | 50 | 700 | Jat, |
| Bhaṭandah, | . | 3,125,000 | . | 400 | 2000 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Pándri, | 34,190 | 686,870 | 47,152 | 20 | 300 | Ranghar. |
| Tháṛah, has a brick fort on the Sutlej, | 273,366 | 7,850,809 | 2,369,841 | 1500 | 1,000 | Munj1 (Var. Shaikh). Jat. |
| Thánésar, has a brick fort. | 228,988-17 | 7,850,803 | 2,069,841 | 50 | 1500 | Ranghar, Jat. |
| Chahat (T. and G. Jhet, Jhut.) on the Ghaggar. | 158,749 | 750,994 | 49,860 | 650 | 1100 | Afghán, Rájpút. |
| Chark (T. Djerk G. Jerk). | 63,683 | 1,538,090 | 21,619 | 20 | 300 | Jat. |
| Khizrábád, has a brick fort. | 332,489 | 12,059,918 | 528,170 | 200 | 3000 | Bhạṭṭi, Jat. |
| Dórálah, | 65,768 | 2,188,443 | 86,710 | 50 | 300 | Ranghar. |
| Dhótah, | 71,357 | 1,601,346 | 1,346 | 300 | 1500 | Rájpút. |
| Deoránah, | 12,339 | 580,985 | 17,385 | 20 | 200 | Jat. |
| Rúpar, has a brick fort, | 66,144 | 5,005,549 | 26,034 | 200 | 1000 | Rájput &c. |
| Sirhind with sub. dist. has a brick fort, | 828,458 | 12,082,630 | 603,536 | 1700 | 2000 | Rájpút, Baráh, Khauṛi, Dádah (Dádu?) Jat. |
| Samánah, | 904,261 | 12,822,270 | 782,000 | 700 | 2000 | Baráh, Jat. |
| Sunám, has a brick fort, | 988,562 | 7,007,696 | 7,696 | 500 | 2000 | Ranghar. |
| Sadhúrah, has a brick fort. | 34,361 | 4,298,064 | 273,265 | 400 | 5000 | Chauhán, Ranghar. |
| Sulṭánpúr Bárhah, | 13,736 | 427,035 | 32,759 | 20 | 100 | Do. Rájpút. |
| Sháhábád, | 134,146 | 6,751,468 | 761,587 | 200 | 1500 | Chauhán, Rájpút, Brahmán. |
| Fatḥpúr, | 50,931 | 684,370 | 15,440 | 25 | 400 | Rájpút, Pundír. |
| Karyát Ráe Samú, | 28,099 | 1,220,090 | 5,374 | 40 | 900 | Ranghar, Jat, Baráh. (var. Bárah.) |
| Kethal, has a brick fort: here Hindu shrines, | 918,025 | 10,638,630 | 309,146 | 200 | 3000 | Rájpút. |
| Guhrám, Do. | 188,574 | 6,138,630 | 1,058,982 | 50 | 100 | Ranghar, Jat, Khauri. |
| Ludhiánah, has a brick fort on the Sutlej, | 43,469 | 2,294,633 | 44,633 | 100 | 700 | Awán.1 Khauri, Ranghar. |
| Musṭafaábád, | 271,399 | 7,496,691 | 570,976 | 200 | 1000 | Chauhán, Ranghar. |
| Maséngan, | 204,377 | 7,053,259 | 626,690 | 200 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Mansúrpúr, | 116,242 | 1,830,025 | 326,690 | 200 | 1000 | Ranghar. |
| Málér, | 103,444 | 260,583 | 26,176 | 100 | 500 | Munj. |
| Máchhíwárah, has a brick fort, | 17,272 | 250,552 | 250,552 | 100 | 500 | Khauri, Wáh (var Wárah). |
| Hápari, | 93,756 | 1,145,118 | . | 30 | 300 | Ranghar, Jat. |
| Ys. | M. | D. | |
| Anangpál, Toṇwar (Tuar or Tenore of U. T.) | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Básdeva | 19 | 1 | 18 |
| Ghangnu (var. Khanku, Khankór, Kankeo, Kanakpál Gangu. | 21 | 3 | 28 |
| Pirthímal (var. Pirthipál) | 19 | 6 | 19 |
| Jaideva | 20 | 7 | 28 |
| Nirpál (var. Hirpál) | 14 | 4 | 9 |
| Adrah, (var. Andiraj and 26-8-15) | 26 | 7 | 11 |
| Bichhráj | 21 | 2 | 13 |
| Bík, (Anekpál, Anakpál) | 22 | 3 | 16 |
| Raghupál | 21 | 6 | 5 |
| Nekpál (Rekhpál) | 20 | 4 | 4 |
| Gopál | 18 | 3 | 15 |
| Sulakhan | 25 | 2 | 2 |
| Jaipál | 16 | 4 | 13 |
| Kaṇwarpál | 29 | 9 | 11 |
| Anekpál | 29 | 6 | 18 |
| Bijaipál, (var. Tajpál) | 24 | 1 | 6 |
| Mahípál (var. Muhetsál) | 25 | 2 | 13 |
| Aknépál | 21 | 2 | 15 |
| Pirthíraj | 22 | 3 | 16 |
| Ys. | M. | D. | |
| Bíldeva (Baldeva) Chauhán | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| Amr Gangú | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Khirpál | 20 | 1 | 5 |
| Súmér | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Jáhir | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Nágdeva | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Pithaura (Prithwi Ráe) | 49 | 5 | 1 |
Eleven princes of the Ghori dynasty reigned 96 years 6 months and 202 days.
| A. H. | A. D. | ||||
| 588 | 1192 | Sulṭán Mụizzu'ddin3 Muḥammad Sám Ghori | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| 602 | 1206 | ” Ḳuṭbu'ddín Eibak | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 607 | 1210 | ” Arám Sháh, his son | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 607 | 1210 | ” Shamsu'ddín Altmish | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| 633 | 1235 | ” Ruknu'ddín Firóz Sháh, his son | 0 | 6 | 28 |
| 634 | 1236 | ” Razíah, his sister, | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 637 | 1239 | ” Muizzu'ddín Bahrám Sháh, his brother | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| 640 | 1242 | ” Aláu'ddín Masạúd Sháh, his nephew | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| 643 | 1245 | ” Náṣiru'ddín Maḥmúd Sháh, his uncle | 19 | 3 | 0 |
| 664 | 1265 | ” Ghiyáṣu'ddín Balban | 20 | and some months. | |
| 685 | 1286 | ” Muizzu'ddín Kaikubád, his grandson | 3 | Do. | |
Thirteen princes of the Khilji dynasty reigned 129 years 10 months and 19 days.
| 688 | 1289 | Sulṭan Jalálu'ddín Khilji | 7, | — some months | |
| 695 | 1295 | Sulṭán Aláu'ddín Khilji his nephew | 20, | some months. | |
| 716 | 1316 | ” Shahábu'ddín Omar, his son | 0 | 3 | some days. |
| 717 | 1317 | ” Ḳuṭbu'ddín Mubárak Sháh, his elder brother | 141 | 4 | 0 |
| 721 | 1321 | ” Náṣiru'ddín Khusrau Khán, | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 721 | 1321 | ” Ghiyáṣu'ddín Tughlaḳ Sháh, | 4, | some months. | |
| 725 | 1324 | ” Muḥammad, his son, | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| 752 | 1351 | ” Firóz Sháh, son of his paternal uncle, | 38 | some months. | |
| 790 | 1388 | ” Tughlaḳ Sháh, his grandson, | 0 | 5 | 32 |
| 791 | 1389 | ” Abu Bakr Sháh, son of his paternal uncle, | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| 793 | 1391 | ” Muḥammad Sháh, his paternal uncle, | 63 | 7 | 0 |
| 796 | 1393 | ” Ala'uddín Sikandar, his son, | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| 796 | 1393 | ” Maḥmúd, his brother, | 20 | 2 | 0 |
| 817 | 1414 | Khizr Khán4 of the Sayyid Dynasty, | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| 824 | 1421 | Mubárak Sháh, ” | 13 | 3 | 16 |
| 837 | 1433 | Muḥammad Sháh, ” | 10, | some months. | |
| 850 | 1446 | Sulṭán Aláu'ddín Aálam Sháh, | 7 | do. | |
| 854 | 1450 | ” Behlól Lodi, | 38 | 8 | 8 |
| 894 | 1488 | ” Sikandar, his son, | 28 | 5 | 0 |
| 923 | 1517 | ” Ibrahím, his son, | 7, | some months. | |
| ” Báber, | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| ” Humayún, | 9 | 8 | 1 | ||
| 947 | 1540 | ” Shér Khán Súr, | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 952 | 1545 | ” Salím Khán, his son, | 8 | and odd. | |
| 960 | 1552 | Sulṭán Múbáriz Khán Adali. | |||
| 961 | 1553 | ” Ibrahím, | some months. | ||
| 962 | 1554 | ” Sikandar, | ditto. | ||
| ” Humáyún, | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
In the year 429 of the era of Bikramájít (A. D. 372) Anangpál1 of the Toṇwar tribe reigned with justice and founded Delhi. In the year 848 of the same luni-solar era (A. D. 791) in the vicinity of that renowned city, a hotly contested battle was fought between Prithiráj Toṇwar and Bíldeva Chauhán, and the sovereignty was transferred to this latter tribe. During the reign of Rájá Pithaura (Prithwi Rájá) Sulṭán Mụizzu'ddín Sám made several incursions into Hindustán without any material success. The Hindu chronicles narrate that the Rájá engaged and defeated the Sulṭán2 in seven pitched battles. In the year 588 A. H. (A. D. 1192,) an eighth engagement took place near Thánésar and the Rájá was taken prisoner. One hundred renowned champions (it is related) were among his special retainers. They were severally called Sámant3 and their extraordinary exploits cannot be expressed in language nor reconciled to experience or reason. It is said that at this battle none of these champions was present, and that the Rájá kept to his palace in selfish indulgence, passing his time in unseemly pleasure, heedless of the administration of the state and of the welfare of his troops.
The story runs that Rájá Jaichand Raṭhór, who held the supremacy of Hindustán was at this time ruling at Kanauj, and the other Rájás to some extent acknowledged his authority and he himself was so liberal-minded that many natives of Irán and Turán were engaged in his service. He announced his intention of celebrating the great sacrifice symbolic of paramount supremacy and set about its preparations. One of its conditions is that all menial service should be performed by princes alone, and that even the duties of the royal scullery and the kindling of fires are directly a part of their office. He likewise promised to bestow his beautiful daughter on the bravest of the assembled chivalry. Rájá Pithaura had resolved to attend the festival, but a chance speech of some courtier that while the Chauhán sovereignty existed, the great sacrifice could not legitimately be performed by the Raṭhór chief, inflamed his ancestral pride and he held back. Rájá Jaichand proposed to lead an army against him, but his counsellors representing the duration of the war and the approach of the appointed assembly, dissuaded him from the enterprise. To carry out the integrity of the festival, a statue of Rájá Pithaura was made in gold and placed in the office of porter at the royal gates. Roused to indignation at this news, Rájá Pithaura set out in disguise accompanied by 500 picked warriors and suddenly appeared at the gathering and carrying off the image, he put a great number to the sword and hastily returned. The daughter of Jaichand, who was betrothed to another prince, hearing of this adventurous deed, fell in love with Pithaura and refused her suitor. Her father, wroth at her conduct, expelled her from her chamber in the palace and assigned her a separate dwelling. Pithaura, distracted at the news, returned with a determination to espouse her, and it was arranged that Chándá a bard, a rival in skill of Babylonian1 minstrelsy, should proceed to the court of Jaichand on the pretence of chanting his praises, while the Rájá himself with a body of chosen followers should accompany him as attendants. Love transformed the intention into act, and by this ingenious device and the spell of valour, he carried off his heart's desire, and after prodigies of bravery and heroism reached his own kingdom. The hundred Sámants (above mentioned) accompanied him under various disguises. One after the other they covered his retreat and defeated their pursuers. Gobind Ráe Gehlót made the first stand and bravely fighting, fell. Seven thousand of the enemy sank engulfed in death before him. Next Narsingh Deva, Chándá, Pundír, and Sárdhól2 Solanki, and Pálhan Deva Kachhwáhah with his two brothers, during the first day's action, after performing feats of astonishing heroism sold their lives dearly, and all these heroes perished in the retreat.
The Rájá, with the bard Chándá and two of his brothers, brought his bride to Delhi amid the admiration of a wondering world.
Unfortunately the prince was all engrossed by his affection for his beautiful wife and neglected all other affairs. After a year had thus passed, Sulṭán Shahábu'ddín by reason of the above events, formed an alliance with Rájá Jaichand, and assembling an army, invaded the country and captured many places. But no one dared even to represent, not to say, remedy this state of affairs. At last, the principal nobles meeting together, introduced Chándá through the seven gates of the palace, who entering the women's apartments, by his representations somewhat disturbed the Rájá's mind. But in the pride of his former victories, he marched to battle with but a small army. As his brave champions were now no more, his kingdom fallen from its ancient renown, and Jaichand his former ally, reversing his past policy, in league with the enemy, the Rájá in this contest was taken prisoner and carried by the Sulṭán to Ghazni. Chándá in his fidelity and loyalty hastened to Ghazni, entered the Sulṭán's service and gained his favour. By his address, he discovered the Rájá and comforted him in his prison. He proposed that he should praise his dexterity with the bow to the Sulṭán who would desire to witness it, and that then he might use his opportunity. The proposal was carried out and the Rájá pierced the Sulṭán with an arrow. His retainers fell upon the Rájá and Chándá and cut them to pieces.
The Persian historians give a different account and state that the Rájá was killed in battle.
Fate discloses many such events from its treasure-house of wonders. But where—and blessed is he—who will take warning thereby and act on the lesson?
When the Chauhán dynasty fell, the choicest portion of Hindustán passed into the hands of Sulṭán Mụizzu'ddín Ghori. Leaving Malik Ḳuṭbu'ddín (Eibak) who was one of his slaves, at the village Guhrám,1 he himself returned to Ghazni, laying waste the hilly country on his northern march. Ḳuṭbu'ddín in the same year possessed himself of Delhi and many other places and followed up his successes with remarkable ability. On the death of Mụizzu'ddín, Ghiyáṣu'ddín Maḥmúd son of Ghiyáṣu'ddín Muḥammad sent from Fírózkoh (his capital) the umbrella and insignia of royalty to Malik Ḳuṭbu'ddín. Ḳuṭbu'ddín was enthroned at Lahore and exalted his reputation by his justice, munificence and valour. He lost his life while playing at chaugán.1
The nobles raised his son Arám Sháh to the throne, but a strong faction set up Malik Altmish, who had been a purchased slave, and was the son-in-law and adopted heir of Ḳuṭbu'ddín. Arám Sháh was defeated and retired into obscurity, and Altmish assumed the title of Shamsu'ddín. It is said that his father was chief of some of the Turkish tribes. His brethren and cousins distracted by envy, sold, like Joseph, this nursling of intelligence, into slavery. Through the vicissitudes of fortune, he had various changes of masters until a merchant brought him to Ghazni. Sulṭán Mụizzu'ddín Sám proposed to purchase him, but his owner chaffered for his value and placed an exorbitant price on him. The Sulṭán enraged, forbade any one to purchase him. Ḳuṭbu'ddín on his return to Ghazni after the conquest of Gujarát, having obtained permission, bought him for a large sum and adopted him as a son. Khwájah Ḳuṭbu'ddín U´shi2 was his contemporary and edified the world by his outward demeanour and the sanctity of his interior life. When Altmish died, his son (Ruknu'ddín Fíróz Sháh) succeeded him who regarded wealth as a means of self-indulgence and thought little of winning the affections of his people. He made over the control of affairs to his mother Sháh Turkán. The nobles withdrawing their allegiance raised Razíah the daughter of Sulṭán Shamsu'ddín to the throne. The Sulṭán himself had previously made her his heir. Some of his courtiers asked him the reason of his doing so while he had sons still living. He replied that his sons, addicted to drinking were unfitted for the dignity. During the reign of Mụizu'ddin Bahrám Sháh, the Mughal troops devastated Lahore. A disloyal faction imprisoned the king and put him to death. In the reign of Sulṭán Aláu'ddín Masạúd Sháh occurred an eruption of the Mughals into Bengal, entering by way of China or Tibet, but his troops defeated them. Another body advanced from Turkishtán to U´ch. The Sulṭán set out to engage them, but on reaching the banks of the Biáh, intelligence reached him that the enemy had retreated. He returned to Delhi and there affected the company of low and base flatterers and ended his days in prison.
Náṣiru'ddin Maḥmúd ruled with capacity and munificence. In his time also, the Mughals entered the Panjáb but retreated on hearing of his approach.
The “Tabaḳát i Náṣiri”1 takes its name from him. He had many excellent qualities. Ghiyaṣu'ddín Balban who had been the slave and son-in-law of his father, he raised to the rank of chief minister and gave him the title of Ulugh2 Khán. This minister filled his high office worthily and sought the divine favour in watchfulness over his people.
Náṣiru'ddín dying without children, the faithful minister was raised to the sovereignty. Clemency and solid gravity of character added fresh lustre to his dignity, and far from spending his precious hours in unworthy pursuits, he gladdened his kingdom by his appreciation of merit, his knowledge of men and his devotion to God. Those of ill repute and the wicked were banished into obscurity, and the good happily prospered under his encouragement. He conferred the government of the Panjáb on his eldest son Muḥammad, commonly known as Khán i Shahíd,3 through whose valour and vigilance the province rested in security. Mír Khusrau and Mír Hasan were in his suite. He was returning from a visit to his father unprepared for hostilities, when he encountered some Mughal troops between Dípálpúr and Lahor and lost his life in the action. Mír Khusrau was taken prisoner but contrived to escape. The province of Bengal had been bestowed by Ghiyáṣu'ddín on his youngest son Bughra Khán.
On the death of Ghiyáṣu'ddín, the nobles despatched Kai Khusrau the son of Khán i Shahíd, who had been nominated heir, to (his father's government of) Multán, and bestowed the title of Sulṭán Mụizzu'ddín Kaikubád on the son of Bughra Khán who thus acquired the sovereignty of Delhi. His father in Bengal, assuming the title of Náṣiru'ddín marched to Delhi whence Kaikubád advanced with a force to encounter him. The armies met on the banks of the Sarjú (Gogra) near the town of Ajodhya, and through the conspiracy of disloyal and evil counsellors, the father after the interview returned to Bengal and the supreme sovereignty rested with the son. It is strange that Amír Khusrau should have chosen such a subject as this interview for encomium in his poem the Kirán u's Sạdain. The fortunes of this thankless unfilial son through his insobriety fell into decay. A faction set up his son, under the title of Shamsu'ddín to remedy the disorder, and the body of the wretched Kaikubád was flung into the waters of the Jumna. Shamsu'ddín was set aside and the sovereignty, by assent of the ministers, conferred on the Khiljis.
Jalálu'ddín who was paymaster of the Imperial forces, ascended the throne and by his simplicity of character lent no favour to the designs of the factious. His nephew Malik Aláu'ddín who had been brought up under his care, went from Karrah to the Deccan and having amassed great booty was inflated by its possession and proved rebellious. The Sulṭán by the persuasion of intriguers advanced from Delhi to Karrah, where the traitor slew him and assumed the title of Sulṭán Aláu'ddín. Thus by a marvel of Fate did the empire devolve on this miscreant, yet he accomplished some excellent reforms. On several occasions he encountered and defeated the Mughals. Mír Khusrau dedicated to him his Khamsah1 and the story of Dewal2 Ráni to his son Khizr Khán. Unfortunately he abandoned his usual prudence and fell under the influence of a eunuch (Káfúr) on whom he conferred the conduct of the administration. Through the suggestions of that wretch, his three sons Khizr Khán, Shádi Khán and Mubárak Khán were imprisoned, and on his own death, by the same instrumentality the youngest son was raised to the throne under the title of Shahábu´ddín. He destroyed the sight of two of his brothers, but Mubárak Khán providentially escaped. A few days later the wretch (Káfúr) was himself assassinated and Mubárak Khán who was in prison became chief minister.
Subsequently he deposed his younger brother, and assumed the title of Sulṭán Ḳuṭbu'ddín. He reduced Gujarát and the Deccan. Through his incapacity and licentious disposition he chose a favourite of the lower orders named Hasan for the comeliness of his person, and bestowed on him the title of Khusrau Khán. Although the faithful ministers of the Crown represented the man's unworthiness and infamy, the king regarded their honest advice as the suggestions of envy, till Khusrau Khán, plotting secretly, dared to assassinate his master and assumed the sovereignty under the title of Náṣiru'ddín. He put to death the surviving members of the family of Aláu'ddín and perpetrated the greatest cruelties. Malik Gházi who was one of Aláu'ddin's chief nobles, defeated and slew him and with the concurrence of the nobles, ascended the throne with the title of Sulṭán Ghiyáṣu'ddín Tughlaḳ Sháh. After settling the affairs of Bengal, he returned to Delhi. His son Muḥammad Khán erected a pavilion at the distance of 3 kós from Delhi, in the space of three days and with much entreaty invited the king to enter it. The roof of the building fell in and the king perished in the ruins. Although (Ziáu'ddín) Barni1 endeavours to substantiate the innocence of Muḥammad Khán, the haste with which the pavilion was erected, and the eagerness to entertain the king therein, have all the appearance of guilty design.
When Sulṭán Muḥammad died, Fíróz the son of (Sálár) Rajab his paternal uncle was, according to the will of Muḥammad, raised to the throne. He ruled with capacity and prudence and left many useful works as memorials of his reign. At his death anarchy to some extent prevailed in the empire. A faction set up his grandson (Ghiyáṣu'ddín) Tughlaḳ Sháh (II) but in a short space he was sent to his last sleep by the hands of traitors and Abu Bakr1 another grandson succeeded him.
In the reign of Sulṭán Maḥmúd, the direction of affairs devolved on Mallú Khán who received the title of Iḳbál Khán, but his incapacity and ill-fortune were unequal to the burden of state guidance. Internal disorders arose. A grandson of Firóz Sháh was acknowledged by some, under the title of Naṣrat Sháh and increased the anarchy. Constant struggles took place in the vicinity of Delhi till in the year 801 A. H. (A. D. 1398) Timúr invaded the country. Sulṭán Maḥmúd fled to Gujarát and every competitor for power was crushed.
When Timúr was on his return march, he left Khizr Khán, whom he had met during this invasion, in the government of Multán and Dípálpúr. For two months Delhi was a waste. Naṣrat Sháh who had fled into the Doáb, took possession of the throne. Iḳbál Khán then marched on Delhi and seized it and the other fled to Mewát. Maḥmúd Khán now came from Gujarát and Iḳbál Khán feigned acceptance of his service. One night the Sulṭán, in desperation of his affairs departed alone to the court of Sulṭán Ibrahím of the Sharḳi dynasty (of Jaunpúr) but met with no encouragement nor assistance. He was compelled therefore to return and Iḳbál Khán now opposed him but without success, and subsequently was taken prisoner in an action against Khizr Khán and was slain. Sulṭán Maḥmúd now took possession of Delhi, and was for some time occupied in hostilities, till he was carried off by an illness, and the Khilji dynasty terminated with him.
For a short period allegiance was paid to Daulat Khán (Lodi) Kháṣah Khail, till Khizr Khán marched from Multán and took possession of Delhi. Malik Mardán Daulat Khán, one of the nobles of the Court of Sulṭán Fíróz, had adopted Sulaimán the father of Khizr Khán as his son who subsequently, in default of recognised heirs, succeeded to his government. 1 Khizr Khán in gratitude (to Timúr) did not2 assume the regal title but styled his Court “The Sublime Standards,” and adorned the Khutbah with the name of that illustrious monarch and afterwards with that of Mírzá Sháh Rukh, but it concluded with a prayer for himself. His son Mubárak Sháh succeeded him in accordance with his will. Sulṭán Ibrahím Sharḳi and Hoshang (of Málwah) being engaged in hostilities, Mubárak intended an attack on Kálpi and the adjacent territories, but he was perfidiously set upon by a band of traitors and slain.3 Muḥammad Sháh, who according to some was the son of Faríd the son of Khizr Khán, while another account makes him the son of Mubárak, was raised to the throne. Sulṭán Aláu'ddín (his son and successor) possessed no share of rectitude and abandoned himself to licentious gratification. Bahlól (Lodi) now aspired to greatness. He was the nephew of Sulṭán Sháh Lódi of the Sháhú Khél4 tribe (of Afgháns). His father Bahrám in the time of Sulṭán Maḥmúd, came with five sons from the borders of Balót to Multán and subsisted with some difficulty5 by traffic. Sulṭán Sháh6 obtained service under Khizr Khán. He received the title of Islám Khán, and the revenues of Sirhind were assigned to him. Bahlól, the son of his nephew on his brother's side was prospering ill in Sirhind, but was received into favour by him and adopted as a son. Bahlól was born in Multán and during the month in which his birth was expected, a beam of the house fell and killed his mother. He was extracted by the Cæsarean operation and his destiny proved fortunate. Although he allowed his sovereign (Aláu'ddín) who lived in retirement (at Badáoṇ) to retain nominal power, he boldly assumed the supreme authority.1 His reign showed some capacity and his conduct was marked by intelligence and recognition of merit. He was carried off by an illness in his 80th year. It is said that he once happened to meet with a darvesh, having at the time with him but a trifling sum of money. The spiritually enlightened recluse called out, “Who will buy the kingdom of Delhi for such a sum of money?” His companions laughed in mockery at the man, but Bahlól frankly gave him all he had, and paid him reverence and eventually fulfilled the prediction.2 He carried on wars with the Sharḳi kings which continued with varying successes, until he took Jaunpúr and this dynasty was overthrown. He left his son, Bárbak at Jaunpúr and returned to Delhi. As he was returning to Delhi from an expedition against Gwalior he died near the town of Saketh.3 His son Nizám Khán with the concurrence of the nobles, assumed the sovereignty and was styled Sulṭán Sikandar. He ruled with sagacity and appreciation of character and transferred the capital to Agra In the year A. H. 911 (A. D. 1505), a great earthquake occurred and many lofty buildings were levelled. Sikandar was of comely person and mild disposition and popular from his liberality and open-handedness.
On his death, his son Sulṭán Ibrahím ascended the throne of Delhi and his authority was recognised as far as the confines of Jaunpúr, the nobles conferring upon Jalál Khán another son of Sikandar's, the sovereignty of Jaunpúr. Dissensions followed between the brothers, and Jalál Khán abandoned his government and took refuge with the governor of Gwalior but meeting with no success, fled to the court of Sulṭán Maḥmúd of Málwah, and succeeding as little there, he set out for Gondwánah. There the royal partisans4 seized him and carried him to the king by whom he was put to death. During his reign various chiefs revolted, such as Daryá Khán Loháni viceroy of Behár, and his son Bahádur Khán had the Khutbah read and the coin minted in his own name. Daulat Khán Lodi fled to Kabul and sought protection at the court of Baber, whom he led to the conquest of Hindustán while affairs resulted in a prosperous issue.
It is situated in the third climate. Its length from the river Satlaj (Sutlej) to the Sind river is 180 kós. Its breadth from Bhimbar to Chaukhandi one of the dependencies of Satgarah,1 86 kós. It is bounded on the east by Sirhind; on the north by Kashmír; on the south by Bikanér and Ajmer; on the west by Multán. It has six principal rivers which all flow from the northern mountains.
(1.) The Sutlej the ancient name of which is Shattudar2 and whose source is in the Káhlór hills. Rúpar, Máchhíwárah and Lúdhiánah are situated on its banks, and it receives the Biáh at the Bauh3 ferry.
(2.) The Biáh (Beás) was anciently called Bipásha, (Sansk. Vipasa Gr. Hyphasis). Its source is named Biahkund in the Kullu mountains in the vicinity of which the town of Sulṭánpúr4 stands above the river.
(3.) The Ravi, the ancient I´rawati,5 rises in the Bhadrál6 hills. Lahor the capital, is situated on its banks.
(4.) The Chenáb, anciently Chandarbhágá. From the summit of the Khatwár7 range issue two sweet water streams, the one called Chandar, the other Bhágá which unite near Khatwár and are known by the above name whence they flow by Bahlólpúr, Súdharah and Hazárah.
(5.) The Bihat,1 anciently called Bidasta, has its rise in a lake in the parganah of Vér in Kashmír, flows through Srinagar and enters Hindustán. Bhérah2 lies on its (left) bank.
(6.) The source of the Sindh (Indus) is placed by some between Kashmír and Káshghar, while others locate it in China. It flows along the borders of the Sawád territory by Aṭak Benares3 and Chaupárah into Balúchistán.
His Majesty has given the name of Béth Jálandhar to the valley between the Biáh and the Satlaj; of Bári, to that between the Biáh and the Rávi; of Rechna to that between the Rávi and the Chenáb; of Jenhaṭ4 to the valley of the Chenáb and the Bihat, and Sindh Ságar to that of the Bihat and Sindh. The distance1
| between | the | Satlaj | and the | Biáh | is | 50 | kós. |
| ” | ” | Biáh | ” | Rávi | ” | 17 | ” |
| ” | ” | Rávi | ” | Chenáb | ” | 30 | ” |
| ” | ” | Chenáb | ” | Bihat | ” | 20 | ” |
| ” | ” | Bihat | ” | Sindh | ” | 68 | ” |
This province is populous, its climate healthy and its agricultural fertility rarely equalled. The irrigation is chiefly from wells. The winter though not as rigorous as in Persia and Turkestán, is more severe than in any other part of India. Through the encouragement given by His Majesty, the choicest productions of Turkestán, Persia and Hindustán are to be found here. Musk-melons are to be had throughout the whole year. They come first in season when the sun is in Taurus and Gemini, (April, May, June,) and a later crop when he is in Cancer and Leo (June, July, August). When the season is over, they are imported from Kashmír and from Kábul, Badakshán and Turkestán. Snow is brought down every year from the northern mountains. The horses resemble the Iráḳ breed and are of excellent mettle. In some parts of the country, they employ themselves in washing the soil whence gold, silver, copper, rúi,2 zinc, brass and lead are obtained. There are skilful handicraftsmen of various kinds.
Láhor is a large city in the Bari Doáb. In size and population it is among the first. In ancient astronomical tables it is recorded as Loháwar. Its longitude is 109° 22', lat. 31° 50'.3 During the present reign the fortifications and citadel have been strengthened with brick masonry and as it was on several occasions the seat of government, many splendid buildings have been erected and delightful gardens have lent it additional beauty. It is the resort of people of all countries whose manufactures present an astonishing display and it is beyond measure remarkable in populousness and extent.
Nagarkót is a city situated on a hill: its fort is called Kángṛah. Near the town is the shrine of Mahamáyá4 which is considered as a manifestation of the divinity. Pilgrims from distant parts visit it and obtain their desires. Strange it is that in order that their prayers may be favourably heard, they cut out their tongues: with some it grows again on the spot, with others after one or two days. Although the medical faculty allow the possibility of growth in the tongue, yet in so short space of time it is sufficiently amazing. In the Hindú mythology, Máhamaya is said to be the wife of Mahádeva, and the learned of this creed represent by this name the energizing power of the deity. It is said that on beholding the disrespect (shown to her husband, ´Siva) she cut herself in pieces and her body fell in four places; her head and some of her limbs in the northern mountains of Kashmír near Kamráj, and these relics are called Sháradá: other parts fell near Bíjápúr in the Deccan and are known as Tuljá (Turja) Bhawáni. Such portions as reached the eastern quarter near Kamrúp are called Kámákhya,1 and the remnant that kept its place is celebrated as Jálandhari which is this particular spot.2
In the vicinity torch-like flames issue from the ground in some places, and others resemble the blaze of lamps.1 There is a concourse of pilgrims and various things are cast into the flames with the expectation of obtaining temporal blessings. Over them a domed temple has been erected and au astonishing crowd assembles therein. The vulgar impute to miraculous agency what is simply the effect of a mine of brimstone.
In the middle of Sindh Ságar near Shamsábád is the cell of Bálnáth Jogi which they call Tilah Bálnáth.1 Devotees of Hindustán regard it with veneration and Jogis especially make pilgrimage to it. Rock-salt is found in this neighbourhood. There is a mountain 20 kós in length from which they excavate it, and some of the workmen carry it out. Of what is obtained, three-fourths is the share of those that excavate and one-fourth is allotted to the carriers. Merchants purchase it at from half to two dáms a man and transport it to distant countries. The landowner takes 10 dáms for every carrier and the merchant pays a duty of one rupee for every 17 man to the state. From this salt artificers make dishes, dish-covers, plates and lamp-stands.
The five Doábs of this province are subdivided into 234 parganahs. The measured land is one krór, 61 lakhs, 55,643 Bíghas, and 3 Biswas. The gross revenue is 55 krórs, 94 lahhs, 58,423 dáms. (Rs. 1,398,646-9-2). Of this 98 lakhs, 65,594 dáms. (Rs. 246,639-13-7) are Suyúrghál. The local force consists of 54,480 Cavalry and 426,086 Infantry.
Jálandhar Doáb.
Containing 60 Mahals, 3,279,302 Bíghas, 17 Biswas. Revenue 124,365,212 Dáms in money. Suyúrghál 2,651,788 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 4,155. Infantry 79,536.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Islímábád, | 2,735 | 458,122 | . | 15 | 200 | Afghán. |
| Pati Dhínót,1 | 57,866 | 3,601,678 | 80,607 | 30 | 400 | Nárú, (var. Márú.) |
| Bhúngá, | 51,089-13 | 2,760,530 | 10,232 | 20 | 300 | Do. (var. Bárad. |
| Bajwárah, | 12,363 | 2,425,813 | 689 | 30 | 200 | Khóri Wáhah. |
| Bhalón, has a stone fort, | 32,761 | 1,305,006 | . | 70 | 1000 | Dhádwál (var. Dóal.) |
| Barwah, | 13,611 | 668,000 | . | . | . | |
| Pálakwáh,2 | 4,532 | 200,000 | . | . | . | |
| Bachhritú,3 | 4,215 | 160,000 | . | . | . | |
| Besáli and Khaṭṭah, 2 Mahals,4 | 11,405 | 566,366 | . | . | . | |
| Talwan, | 201,450 | 6,780,337 | 804,389 | 70 | 700 | Maín.5 |
| Tatárpúr, has a stone fort, | 3,458 | 170,388 | . | . | . | |
| Jálandhar, has a brick fort, | 474,308 | 14,751,626 | 773,167 | 100 | 1000 | Afghán Lodhi, and Loháni, and Ranghar tribe. |
| Chaurási. | 96,330 | 5,463,913 | 255,516 | 50 | 1000 | Afghán. |
| Jeorá, | 48,124 | 2,474,854 | 23,527 | 50 | 300 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Jasón Bálákóti, has a stone fort, | 15,054 | 600,000 | . | 500 | 3000 | Jaswál, called also Bikanér. |
| Chitór or Chítór,6 | . | 313,000 | . | 100 | 2000 | Sombansi. |
| Hájípúr Sáriyánah, | 59,255 | 2,693,874 | . | . | . | |
| Dádrak,7 | 497,202-11 | 9,707,993 | 92,153 | 150 | 4000 | Khóri Wáhah. |
| Désúhah, has a brick fort, | 157,962 | 4,474,950 | 67,249 | . | . | Khokhar.8 |
| Ḍaḍyál, has a stone fort, | 34,150 | 1,650,000 | . | 300 | 4000 | Sasahwál. |
| Ḍáḍáh, Do. | 30,218 | 1,200,000 | . | . | . | |
| Darparah, | 26,444 | 900,000 | . | . | . | |
| Dardhi, | 15,054 | 600,000 | . | 100 | 1000 | Sombansi. |
| Dúnnágór, | 11,490 | 455,870 | . | . | . | |
| Dhankali, | 1,880 | 72,000 | . | . | . | |
| Raḥímábád, | 8,750 | 2,480,639 | 13,631 | 30 | 200 | Khóri Wáah. |
| Rájpúrpatan, has a stone fort, | . | 1,800,000 | . | . | . | . |
| Sulṭánpúr, has a brick fort, | 101,865 | 4,020,232 | 405,830 | 200 | 1000 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Sánkarbanót, | 59,952 | 2,533,225 | 16,485 | 50 | 500 | Khóri Wáhah. |
| Sakhet1 Mandawi, has copper and iron mines, | 42,150 | 1,680,000 | . | 100 | 8000 | Sombansi. |
| Sópar, | 24,583 | 1,000,000 | . | . | 2000 | Sasahwál.2 |
| Síbah, has a stone fort, | 8,114-18 | 800,000 | . | 200 | 2000 | Do. |
| Során, | 213,3333 | . | . | . | . | . |
| Shaikhpúr, | 97,173 | 4,722,604 | 52,639 | 150 | 2000 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Shergaṛh, | 3,640 | 194,294 | . | . | . | . |
| Iísápúr, | . | 346,667 | . | . | . | . |
| Kóthí, | 116,286 | 5,546,661 | 30,670 | 30 | 400 | Jat. |
| Gaṛh Dumbálah.4 | 58,083 | 2,670,087 | 4,530 | 20 | 200 | Jat. |
| Koṭlah, | 42,152 | 1,680,000 | . | 300 | 4000 | Jasroṭiah. |
| Kotláhar, has a stone fort. | 32,932-16 | 1,310,847 | . | 200 | 3000 | Kotlaharíah. |
| Kharakdhár, | 42,043-12 | 48??,000 | . | . | . | . |
| Khéúnkhérá, has a stone fort, | 6,021-16 | 240,000 | . | under Nakróh | Jaswál. | |
| Gangóṭ, has a stone fort, | 6,021-16 | 240,000 | . | . | . | Do. |
| Khérah, | 6,021-16 | 240,000 | . | 20 | 4000 | Súrajbansi. |
| Ghawásan (var and G. Ghawás.) | 14,742-14 | 586,906 | . | . | . | . |
| Lóídhéri, | 15,959-8 | 536,414 | 17,810 | . | . | . |
| Lálsangi, | 5,937 | 236,850 | . | . | . | . |
| Miáni Núriah,5 | 68,229 | 21,061,565 | 6,156 | 20 | 400 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Mélsi, | 54,653-17 | 1,823,559 | 1,217 | 20 | 3000 | Ranghar, Jat. |
| Muḥammadpúr, | 38,231 | 1,802,558 | 10,553 | 100 | 1000 | Ranghar, Maín.6 |
| Mánsawál, | 6,668 | 286,667 | . | . | . | . |
| Malót,7 | 6,412 | 4,603,620 | . | . | . | . |
| Manḍhòtah, | 13,280 | 426,367 | . | . | . | . |
| Nakódar, | 78,731 | 3,710,796 | 9,757 | 20 | 1000 | Maín. |
| Nankal, | 4,808 | 267,270 | . | . | . | . |
| Nakróh,8 | 32,642 | 1,300,061 | . | 500 | 5000 | Jaswál. |
| Nonangal, | 46,180 | 2,315,368 | . | 30 | 300 | Baloch, Jat. |
| Nandón, | 133,439 | 5,300,000 | . | 100 | 1500 | Nagarkotiah. |
| Harhánah with Akbarábád, 2 Mahals, | 626,889 | 6,032,032 | 49,650 | 40 | 406 | Nárú. |
| Hadíábád, | 17,126 | 519,467 | 2,067 | . | . | . |
Containing 52 Mahals. 4,580,002 Bíghas, 18 Biswas. Revenue 142,808,183 Dáms revenue in cash from crops charged at special rates and from land paying the general bigáh rate. Suyúrghál, 3,923,922 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 31,055. Infantry, 129,300.
| Bíghas, Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | ||
| Anchharah, | . | 500,000 | . | 50 | 500 | Khokhar. | |
| Andórah, | 20,781 | 1,193,739 | 7,624 | . | . | . | |
| Abhípúr, | . | 168,000 | . | . | . | . | |
| U´dar, | . | 9,600 | . | . | . | . | |
| Lahore city Baldah see Elliot p. 83. | . | 2,912,600 | . | 5000 | 4000 | . | |
| Phulwári, | 4,727-10 | 452,694 | 143,955 | 20 | 100 | . | |
| Phúlrá, | 106,463 | 2,413,268 | 13,268 | 20 | 100 | Sadhál,1 Bhalar. | |
| Panchgrámi, | 65,557 | 1,461,630 | 73,177 | 15 | 1000 | Khokhar. | |
| Bharli,2 | 17,967 | 4,060,507 | 209,789 | . | . | . | |
| Bhelwál, | 62,875 | 3,181,699 | 225,408 | 20 | 400 | Jat. | |
| Pati Haibatpúr,3 | 1,576,633 | 28,395,380 | 284,647 | 700 | 10,000 | Jat. | |
| Batálah, | 515,479 | 16,820,998 | 256,853 | 200 | 5000 | Bhaṭṭi, Jat. | |
| Paṭhán, has a brick fort, | 199,872 | 7,297,015 | 97,015 | 250 | 2000 | Bráhman. | |
| Paniál, | 65,789 | 4,266,000 | 276,091 | 150 | 400 | Jat Khatián. | |
| Biáh, | 60,523 | 3,822,255 | 8,976 | 200 | 2000 | Bhatti. | |
| Bahádurpúr, | 11,489 | 447,750 | . | . | . | ||
| Talwárah, | 6,334 | 514,666 | 10,364 | 20 | 200 | Baḳḳál. | |
| Thandóṭ, | 25,222 | 610,064 | 3,234 | 20 | 500 | Afghán. | |
| Chandráu, | 7,194-10 | 263,568 | . | 20 | 100 | Jat, Sindhú. | |
| Chárbágh Barhi, | 213 | 58,502 | . | . | . | . | |
| Jamári (var. Chamári), | 250,614 | 8,813,140 | 309,090 | 200 | 2000 | Khokhar. | |
| Jalálábád, | 152,058 | 5,163,119 | 30,456 | 300 | 4000 | Afghán, Jat, Bhaṭṭi. | |
| Chhat and Ambálah, 2 Mahals, | . | 2,300,000 | . | 50 | 500 | Rájpút Sómbansi. | |
| Jaṭgar,4 | . | 45,600 | . | . | . | . | |
| Khánpúr, | . | 280,038 | . | 30 | 600 | Khokhar. | |
| Dábhawálah, | 121,495 | 6,282,139 | 57,674 | 100 | 3000 | Jat. | |
| Dahméri,5 | . | 1,600,000 | . | 60 | 1300 | . | |
| Darwah, | . | 240,000 | . | 50 | 500 | Rájpút Sombansi. | |
| Darwah, Dígar,1 | . | 24,000 | . | . | . | . | |
| Sankhá Arwal, | 10,874 | 544,145 | 19,413 | 10 | 100 | Arwal. | |
| Sindhúwán, | 263,402 | 5,854,649 | 12,700 | 200 | 400 | Jat Sindhú. | |
| Lahore suburbs, | 11,401 | 674,053 | 202,300 | . | . | . | |
| Sháhpúr, | 42,399 | 2,382,235 | 126,720 | . | . | . | |
| Shérpúr, | . | 480,000 | . | . | . | . | |
| Ghurbatráwan,2 | 7,391-13 | 411,985 | 63,103 | 20 | 100 | Jat Sindhú. | |
| Kasúr, | 259,456 | 3,915,506 | 23,124 | 300 | 4000 | Bhaṭṭi. | |
| Kalánúr, | 286,052 | 8,329,111 | 447,639 | 150 | 1500 | Jat, Baḳḳál. | |
| Kaoṇ Wáhan, | 63,608 | 3,511,499 | 127,665 | 50 | 500 | Khokhar, Bakhás.3 | |
| Khokhowál,4 | 75,194 | 3,475,510 | 3,510 | 20 | 500 | Jat. | |
| Gwáliyar, | 66,239 | 2,643,000 | 3,000 | 100 | 3000 | Rajpút Sómbansi. | |
| Kángṛah, has a stone fort, | . | 2,400,000 | . | 2400 | 29,000 | Sómbansi. | |
| Kotlah, | . | 182,518 | . | . | . | . | |
| Karkáráon, | 16,000 | . | . | . | . | ||
| Malik Sháh, | 28,684-9 | 1,475,562 | 52,283 | 10 | 100 | Bhandál, (var. Bhadál.) | |
| Mau and Nabáh,5 2 Mahals. | . | 2,400,000 | . | 300 | . | Rájpút. | |
| Mahrór, | . | 24,000 | . | . | . | . | |
| Hoshiár Karnálah,6 | 22,225 | 489,372 | . | 20 | 400 | Jat. | |
| Pálam, | These four parganahs, are now abandoned. | . | 9,600 | . | . | . | . |
| Patiyár, | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| Bhaṭṭi, | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| Jarjíyah,7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
Containing 57 Mahals. 4,253,148 Bíghas, 3 Biswas. Revenue, 172,047,691 Dams. Suyúrghál, 2,684,134 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 6,795. Infantry, 99,652.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Amráki Bhaṭṭi, | 70,752-8 | 1,942,606 | 8,673 | 50 | 1000 | Bhaṭṭi. |
| Lands of Bágh Rae Bochah. | 2,683 | 52,837 | . | . | . | . |
| Uminábád, has a brick fort. | 515,675-4 | 24,853,006 | 498,480 | 500 | 5000 | Khokhar, Chímah8 &c. |
| Panchnagar,1 | 31,741 | 1,181,266 | 27,879 | 50 | 500 | Jat. |
| Parsarór, (I. G. Pasrúr), | 509,858-4 | 27,978,583 | 486,551 | 200 | 4000 | Jat, Bájóh2 Télah &c. |
| Badúbhandál,3 | 23,752-18 | 1,611,882 | 46,979 | . | . | . |
| Pati Zafarwál, has a fort, | 6,108,148 | 3,697,338 | 150,865 | 50 | 2000 | Jat, Bhólrón.4 |
| Pati Tarmali,5 | 29,056 | 525,953 | . | 20 | 400 | Kólrá. |
| Bhalót, | 20,312-10 | 818,182 | . | 100 | 2000 | Manhás.6 |
| Bhadrán,7 situate on a hill, | . | 240,000 | . | 50 | 4000 | Do. |
| Baláwarah, | 6,021-6 | 240,000 | . | 50 | 3000 | Baláwaríah. |
| Bhútiyál, | 2,407-18 | 96,000 | . | 30 | 1000 | Bhútiyálah. |
| Ban, | 1,346-19 | 48,000 | . | 100 | 4000 | Manhás. |
| Táral, | 38,669-8 | 2,144,945 | 8,400 | 150 | 2000 | Jat, Táral. |
| Talóndi, | 95,698-17 | 1,578,207 | 3,792 | 30 | 300 | Jat. |
| Chimah Chatah, | 95,698 | 5,878,691 | 26,439 | 100 | 1000 | Chímah Chatah. |
| Chandanwarak, (var. darak), | 81,426-6 | 4,128,331 | 30,571 | 50 | 150 | Jat. Warak. |
| Chhoṭáḍhar, | 22,858-5 | 1,391,692 | . | . | . | . |
| Jabúḍhaḍi,8 | 12,474 | 815,587 | 31,135 | . | . | . |
| Chaníwat, has a brick9 fort. | 154,154 | 2,806,369 | 190,052 | 500 | 5000 | Jat, Jabúhar.10 |
| Jammú, situate at the foot of a hill, and a stone fort, above it,11 | 19,329-11 | 3,956,000 | . | 1000 | 20,000 | Manhás. |
| Jasrótá, (in one MS) | 150,430 | . | . | 400 | 5000 | Malanhás. |
| in another. | 430-19 | 1,150,000 | . | . | . | . |
| Chari Champá,12 | 6,021-6 | 240,000 | . | 100 | 1000 | Gwáléri. |
| Háfizábád, | 169,499 | 4,548,000 | 48,000 | 150 | 150 | Jat Balhan! (Bhalar.) |
| The lands of Khánpúr, | 402 | 27,028 | . | . | . | . |
| Daulatpúr, | 4,779-10 | 115,050 | . | . | . | . |
| Dáúd Bhandál Barhi, | 23,142 | 1,725,089 | 237,082 | . | . | . |
| Daulatábád, | 14,368 | 241,740 | . | 10 | 100 | Jat Salah, (var. Sad.) |
| Rúpnagar, | 6,705 | 410,513 | . | . | . | . |
| Rínhá, | 58,850-8 | 275,550 | 5,461 | . | . | Bráhman, Bághbán. |
| Rechná, | 130,207 | 8,680,742 | 442,082 | 700 | 7000 | . |
| Sáhúmali, | 152,391 | 5,574,764 | 18,353 | 40 | 1200 | . |
| Sidhpúr, | 108,923 | 3,127,212 | 76,972 | 100 | 2000 | Jat, Maráli. |
| Siálkóṭ, is situate on the edge of a ridge on the banks of the Aik torrent, has a brick fort, | 102,035 | 22,090,792 | 184,305 | 500 | 7000 | Jat, Ghaman1 and Chímah. |
| Sahajráo,2 | 5,627-7 | 362,326 | 4,803 | 100 | 1000 | Chímah. |
| Súdharah, on the Chenáb, has a high brick minaret, | 121,721-1 | 7,096,710 | 99,731 | 100 | 1000 | Do.3 |
| Shánzdah Hinjráo,4 | 64,140 | 1,536,480 | . | 50 | 1000 | Jat, Hinjráo.5 |
| Ṣhór, | 107,347 | 2,278,940 | 5,061 | 1000 | 5000 | Jat, Langáh, Sanáwal (Saháwal). |
| Fattú Bhandál Barhi, | 7,826-7 | 613,917 | 5,842 | . | . | |
| Fazlábád, | 2,115-7 | 136,528 | . | . | . | |
| Gobindwál, | 55,069 | 1,253,957 | 194,622 | 50 | 300 | Orak and Jat. |
| Káthoháh, | 126,598-12 | 5,888,254 | . | 20 | 10,000 | Kámwál (var. Káhwál.) |
| Gujrán Barhi, | 2,631-14 | 670,936 | 11,787 | . | . | |
| Kálápind, | 2,801-19 | 203,964 | 21,702 | . | . | |
| Kárnari,6 commonly called Sáníá, | 27,665-4 | 1,500,000 | . | 100 | 300 | |
| Kharli Tarli, | . | 768,000 | . | . | . | |
| Lakhnór, | 17,169-1 | 681,818 | . | . | . | |
| Mangaṭwálah, | 131,583 | 3,819,690 | 57,788 | 50 | 300 | Jat. |
| Muḥammad Bari Dúkráo, | 16,561-6 | 1,127,903 | 3,367 | . | . | Jat. |
| Mahrór, | 102,586-4 | 3,005,602 | 6,602 | 5 | 500 | Bráhman. |
| Méngri, | 62,293 | 1,475,225 | 5,748 | 20 | 1000 | Silharíyá and Gújar. |
| Mankóṭ, includes 4 towns each with a stone fort, | 1,312 | 85,119 | . | 30 | 1200 | Manhás. |
| Wan, | 140,234 | 371,553 | 20,278 | 50 | 1000 | Járak7 Silhar. |
| Hamínagar, | 141,063 | 8,391,087 | 59,541 | 30 | 1000 | Jat. |
| Hantíyál, (var. Hatiyál), | 6,201-6 | 240,000 | . | 30 | 200 | Hatíyálah. |
Containing 21 Mahals, 2,633,210 Bíghas, 5 Biswas. Revenue, 64,502,394 Dáms. Suyúrghál 511,070 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 3,730. Infantry, 44,200.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Andarhal, | 31,070 | 485,418 | . | . | . | Gakkhar (see Vol. I. 456). |
| Akhandór Ambáran, | 9,866-5 | 392,000 | . | 300 | 3000 | Manhás. |
| Bhérah, on the banks of the Bhimbar,1 | 912,107-7 | 19,910,000 | 53,560 | 700 | 10,000 | |
| Bahlólpúr, on the banks of the river Chenab, | 170,607 | 3,830,575 | 10,583 | 100 | 500 | Jat. |
| Bólét, | 8,748 | 400,080 | . | 50 | 300 | |
| Bhimbar, situated on the banks of the stream, | 28,668 | 1,200,000 | . | . | . | |
| Bhadú, | 4,717 | 192,000 | . | 30 | 1200 | Jat, Bhandwál.2 |
| Búhati, | 2,874 | 57,222 | . | 10 | 100 | Mangharwál.3 |
| Sáílá and Dudíyál,4 2 Mahals, | 27,421 | 735,741 | . | 200 | 800 | Khokhar. |
| Shórpúr, | 169,874 | 3,121,546 | 8,497 | 100 | 1000 | Jat, Khokar, Jandér. |
| Shakarpúr, | 7,684 | 1,050,819 | . | . | . | |
| Gujrát, | 285,094 | 8,266,150 | . | 120 | 1000 | |
| Karíyáli, | 57,818 | 2,643,270 | 6,633 | 100 | 2000 | |
| Khokhar, has a brick fort | 92,826 | 2,320,594 | 58,410 | 100 | 1000 | Khokar. |
| Ghari, on the river Bihat, | 20,176 | 1,505,241 | . | 20 | 2000 | Do. |
| Lólór, separated from Khusháb, | 192,253 | 3,746,166 | 11,290 | 200 | 2000 | Khokhar and Míkan.5 |
| Mangli, | 2,839 | 432,000 | . | 400 | 2000 | Manhás. |
| Malóṭ Ráe Kedári, situate on a hill, | 17,007 | 370,549 | . | 40 | 400 | Mangharwál. |
| Haréo, | 247,878 | 9,150,828 | 76,321 | 300 | 3000 | Tat, Barwánij? |
| Hazárah, has a brick fort, | 270,392 | 4,689,136 | 219,536 | 700 | 3000 | Jat, Khokar Báranij? |
Containing 42 Mahals, 1,409,929 Bighas. Revenue, 51,912,201 Dáms. Suyúrghál, 4,680 Dáms. Castes, various. Cavalry, 8,553. Infantry, 69,700.
| Bíghas Biswas. | Revenue D. | Suyúrghál D. | Cavalry. | Infantry. | Castes. | |
| Akbarábád Tarkhéri,1 | 204,381 | 5,491,738 | . | 2000 | 15,000 | Gakkhar. |
| Aṭak Benáres (Attock), | 5,418 | 3,202,2162 | . | 1000 | 5000 | Khatar, called also Salásah.3 |
| Awán, here are horses of good breed,4 | 10,096 | 415,970 | . | 50 | 500 | Awán. (See Vol. I. 456, n. and I. G. under Hazára). |
| Paharhálah, has a stone fort, below the fort runs the river Sowári5 (Sohán), | 192,247 | 5,158,109 | . | . | . | |
| Bél Gházi Khán, | 17,426 | 320,000 | . | 100 | 1500 | Jánóhah (Janjúah, see Vol. I, 456) |
| Bálá Khaṭṭar, | 5,825 | 1,000,040 | . | 20 | 100 | Khaṭṭar. |
| Paru6 Khaṭṭar, | 1,195 | 48,000 | . | . | . | |
| Balókidhan, | 7,679 | 1,316,801 | . | 100 | 500 | Gakkhar. |
| Tharchak7 Dámi, | 6,082 | 250,575 | . | 100 | 1000 | Do. |
| Suburban district of Rohtas, has a stone fort, beneath which flows the Kuhán stream,8 | 120,884 | 60,403,140 | 67,052 | 500 | 3000 | Gakkhar, Bagiyál. |
| Khusháb, situate near the river Bihat (Jhelum) the greater part is jungle, | 73,086 | 2,702,509 | . | 500 | 7000 | Afghán Niyazi9 and Isá Khél. |
| Dán Gari, | 147,647 | 3,301,201 | . | 1500 | 10,000 | Gakkhar. |
| Dhankoṭ situato on the banks of the river Mihran, viz., Indus, has a salt mine, | 8,927 | 480,000 | . | 150 | 4000 | Awán. |
| Darband, (here two unintelligible words), | . | 3,100,000 in money. | . | 20 | 500 | Jánóhah (Janjúah). |
| Dharáb, | 2,330 | 96,000 | . | 20 | 150 | Do. |
| Dúdwat, | 2,830 | 96,000 | . | 20 | 300 | Do. |
| Réshán, | 1,195 | 92,496 | . | 10 | 200 | Awán. |
| Shamsábád, | 24,664 | 7,034,503 | . | 50 | 500 | Gakkhar, (var. Khokhar). |
| Patálá (var. Batálá, Miálá, Shambálá), | 11,146 | 624,000 | . | 100 | 1500 | Jánóhah. |
| Fateḥpúr Kálauri (var. Kanauri and T.), | 157,042 | 4,261,831 | . | 500 | 10,000 | Gakkhar. |
| Kalbhalak, | 40,913 | 2,883,253 | 18,176 | 30 | 200 | Baloch. |
| Ghéb (var. Khét, Khés, Khep), | 16,961 | 934,161 | . | 300 | 1200 | Khaṭṭar (sic). |
| Khár Darwázah, | 4,316 | 24,541 | . | 50 | 300 | Jánóhah. |
| Kirjhák,1 | 21,491 | 961,755 | . | 100 | 1500 | Do. |
| Kachákoṭ, one kós distant from this parganah is the spring of Ḥasan Abdál2 | 5,825 | 340,000 | . | 50 | 2000 | Ráwalah Tarín Afghán. |
| Káhwán, has a stone fort, | 4,660 | 192,000 | . | 10 | 200 | Jánóhah. |
| Kambat, | 2,330 | 96,000 | . | . | . | |
| Langahtiyár, (var. G. Siyár). | 2,330 | 96,000 | . | 10 | 100 | |
| Mákhiálah, has a stone fort on a hill—there is scarcity of water—has a salt mine and a shrine, | 9,320 | 834,000 | . | 100 | 1500 | Jánóhah. |
| Maráli, at the foot of a mountain, | 5,825 | 240,000 | . | 15 | 500 | |
| Malót, has a stone fort on a hill, | 3,236 | 133,233 | . | 10 | 200 | Janohah. |
| Nandanpúr, has a brick fort on a hill, | 40,997 | 24,110 | 4,110 | 20 | 150 | Do. |
| Níláb, (Indus) land included under (Attock) Bénares | 8,787 | 481,305 | . | . | . | |
| Nárwi, on the Sind, | 997 | 38,??91 | . | under Akbarábád. | Gakkhar. | |
| Nókósíral Khaṭṭar, | 926 | 38,096 | . | 10 | 50 | Khaṭṭar. |
| Hazárah Ḳarlaḳ,1 | 214,932 | 1,805,342 | 5,342 | 100 | 500 | Dálázák Afghán. |
| Hatíyár Lang, | 7,281 | 300,000 | . | . | . | Bhakar barkhatri (with illegible variants.) |
| Hazárah Gújrán, | 6,575 | 280,896 | . | under Akbarábád. | ||
| Himmat Khán Karmún, | 165 | 48,000 | . | Do. | Gakkhar. | |
This term is more strictly confined
to Rájpúts converted to Islám, but in
parts of Delhi, particularly Rohtak, it
is indiscriminately applied to Rájpúts,
whether Hindu or Muhammadan. The
probable derivation is from the Sansk.
This mound stands to this day considerably above the surrounding level and consists entirely of ancient remains crumbling to decay. It is a town of undoubted antiquity and supposed to figure in the earliest Aryan traditions under the name of Apelava, part of the Pandava Kingdom of Indraprasthra, I. G.
↩A note states that the maps mark a village called Dáhinah in the parganah of Sahnah near the confines of Jársah parganah, but no river is mentioned.
↩Claim descent from a Jádon Rájpút. Elliot. I. 99.
↩T. and G. have Serót and Seroot respectively. The I. G. mentions one in Rae Bareli the other in Fyzabad Dist. the latter was a flourishing weaving town and an imámbárah was built at a cost of £400 by a voluntary contribution of ¼ of a pice for each piece of cloth from each weaver. The King of Oudh hearing of this, commended their liberality and piety and as an encouragement, graciously desired its continuance, as a contribution to his private purse. It is not reported how the weavers received the royal message.
↩T. Sanhata, G. Sanyhet.
↩Sir H. Elliot has an interesting discussion on the Gaur Tagas, an important tribe of Brahmincal descent in the N.-W. of India extending over a great part of upper Rohilkhand, the upper Doáb and the Delhi territory. Mr. Beames supplements his conclusions with a note which embodies without accepting the learned but unsafe deductious of General Cunningham. Tod's Rajasthán furnishes additional matter if not imformation, regarding the obscurity of their origin. Sherring's Hindu Tribes and Castes should be consulted in elucidation of the doubtful readings of the text, a note on each of which would be impracticable.
↩Var. Jandrán.
↩Var. Toṇwar (Tuár).
↩Vár. Talhati. Elliot Balai.
↩Var. and G. Batila.
↩Var. and T. Adon, G. Adown.
↩Var. and G. Batila.
↩Var. Thanki. G. Thungy. T. Lunghi.—Note “in the maps, Chanki, now called Balahri and Sarbaná.”
↩Now Jaspúr.
↩Now Gadarpúrah.
↩Var. Talwárah.
↩Khassiah is given in Elliot (Appendix, C. 287, I.) as a branch of the Sudras.
↩A Rájpút clan, which has been considered to be the same as the Ghakkar. E. I. 99.
↩Probably, according to Dr. King, the Morus laevigata, a long thin berry with a mawkish, sweet taste.
↩ This word (
Var. Sadar.
↩Sanbaltará.
↩Var. Sadri note suggests Pundír.
↩Var. Khaldán, Jaldáz.
↩Called after the Emperor Fíróz Sháh Tughlak who founded the town of that name about 1354 A. D.
↩Var. Ḥátú, Jálú. Jáṭú is no doubt correct. It is another form of the word Jat, but also means a branch of the Chamár tribe, and is said to be a Rájpút tribe about Karnál, chiefiy Muḥammadans.
↩Govardhan (nourisher of kine) name of a hill in Brindában, said to have been lifted up and supported by Krishna upon one finger for 7 days to shelter the cowherds from a storm of rain sent by Indra to test Krishna's divinity. Hence he is called Govardhan dhar and Giri dhar the hill-supporter. A variant of Aṭkhérah is Ankharah. G. and T. Augharah.
↩A Jat clan.
↩At p. 105, Bhaṭṭú. These discrepancies cannot always be noted and must be compared by reference to both lists, See Elliot's Races N-W. P. Vol. II, p. 133.
↩This and the Sheoram are two of the chief Jat clans of the Delhi territory.
↩See. Vol. I, p. 526.
↩See Elliot, I. 113. Extract from Cunningham who gives the possession of Taxila to this people before Alexander's invasion. Also Vol. I, p. 456, of the present work.
↩This number does not accord with the totals. It would be as unprofitable as it is hopeless to attempt to digest or reconcile the order, number and length of these reigns among various authorities, when dates are unknown or conjectural, the names of the princes disputed and their existence mythical. After this, the minute exactness of their duration of reigns would be ridiculous enough even were not the totals short of the number that heads the list, by about 60 years. Tieffenthaler begins the series from Yudishthira, differing as widely from Wilford and Tod, as they do from each other, and follows with another series from “quelques eorits persans” at variance with what has preceded, and continuing with a further list of princes “rapportés encore différement” from a Persian history. The unravelling of this tangle will afford abundant occupation to those interested in these details. I suspect that they are not many.
↩Var. 73 and Gladwin 83. The total gives 94-7. Cf. Table XXIII of U. T. p. 104, and Table L of the Indian dynasties taken from Ferishta, p. 124.
↩Var. 8.
↩Also called Shahábu'ddín.
↩All the MSS. concur in this glaring error, an evident slip of a copyist of 14 for 4. He was raised to the throne on the 7th Muharram A. H. 717 (22nd March 1317) and was killed 5th Rabíi I, A. H. 721 (5th April 1321.)
↩Var. 8.
↩Thus in all MSS., but Ferishta discovers the method of computation by dating this reign from the abdication of his father Firóz Sháh in his favour on the 6th Shạbán 789 A. H. (21st August 1387) to his death on the 17th Rabíi I 796 (20th January 1393) disregarding the two intermediate reigns.
↩I take the dates from the U. T. but discrepancies arise from disputed successions, and the state of anarchy which often existed in the intervals of these reigns.
↩Another name for Raya-Séna. Wilford says that he was called Anangpála or befriended by love probably for his success in his amours, which he displayed by carrying off his brother's wife. Teiffenthaler calls him Rasena and credits him with the building of Delhi, which is confirmed by the Agni-purána. Wilford's criticism of these dates and his emendations (Vol. IX. As. Res. p. 169) are based on the incorrect statement that Abul Fazl makes the 1st year of Vikramaditya to correspond with the 1st of the Hijra. His conclusions are consequently entirely wrong.
↩ The text should have
I learn from Professor Cowell that the primary meaning attached to this term in the St. Petersburg Dict. is ‘neighbour,’ and the second signification, ‘vassal,’ in which sense it often occurs in Sanskrit poetry. Monier Williams defines it as “a neighbouring king—a feudatory or tributary prince” and adds a third meaning ‘a leader, general, champion’ which applies to the text.
↩ The words in the text
Var. Sádhól.
↩ See list of towns in Sirhind Division,
p. 296. Ferishta writes
He fell with his horse while playing at polo, the modern term for an ancient game, and the pommel of his saddle entered his chest and killed him. A. H. 607, (1210 A. D.) Ferishta. The Kutab Mínár, a mosque at Delhi still preserve his name, if not his memory. The old chaugán or polo grounds still exist, says Cunningham, (Ladák, p. 311) in every large town in the Panjab hills; in Biláspur, Nadon, Kangra, Haripur and Chamba where the goal stones are still standing. The game is repeatedly mentioned by Baber, but became obsolete gradually after his time.
↩U´sh is in Transoxiana and was his birthplace. He is also known as Káki from the miraculous production of bread cakes of the kind called in the vernacular kák supplied by the prophet Khizr for the needs of his family whose sustenance his meditations gave him no leisure or occasion to provide. These cakes were in Ferishta's day still baked and offered at his shrine. His mother was a woman of great and austere virtue, and his future sanctity was predicted by Khizr by whose personal apparition he was twice honoured. He was offered by Altmish the office of Shaikh u'l Islám which he declined. His intercourse with that monarch and the eminent saints of his day may be gathered from Ferishta's monograph of his life at the close of his history. He died on the 14th Rabai I, A. H. 634, (A. D. 1236). A sketch of his life is given in Dorn's History of the Afghans, Book III, p. 2, and his death placed in A. H. 603.
↩A general history of Persia and India, down to the time of Sulṭán Nasíru'ddin of Delhi, A. D. 1252. The author was Abu Omar Manháj al Jorjáni.
↩
Or the martyred prince. See his death in Elphinstone, after his defeat of the Mughals under Tímúr Khán, and in Ferishta under Ghiyásu'ddin Balban where Abul Fazl's assertion of the prince's unpreparedness is not confirmed. It was in the pursuit of the flying Mughals that he was surprised by an ambush while he halted by the banks of a stream to drink and to return thanks to God for his victory. Mír Khusrau alludes to his escape in his well-known poem, the Khizr Kháni.
↩Or five poems, viz., the Hasht Bihisht, Sikandar Námah, Panj Ganj, Laila wa Majnún, Shírín wa Khusrau.
↩Known as Dewildé to western literature. Moore in a note to the preface of Lalla Rookh alludes to this poem on the authority of Ferishta as “the history of the loves of Dewildé and Chizer the son of the Emperor Alla, written in an elegant poem by the noble Chusero.” The story will be found in Briggs, Vol. I, pp. 327-366. Kauṇla Devi her mother, the wife of Karan Ráe of Nahrwála had been taken captive in the wars against that prince (1297) and placed in the royal harem. In 1306 an expedition proceeding to the Deccan under Káfúr, Kauṇla Devi represented to the king that she had borne two daughters to her former husband, that one had died, but the other Dewal Devi was still alive and she desired to recover her. Passing through Málwah, Káfúr demanded her of Karan Rae without success. Shankan Deva Ráe, prince of Deogarh had long sought to obtain her hand, but the proud Rajput had hitherto refused his daughter to the upstart Mahratta. The desire to gain his aid in the war against the king's troops secured his consent and he despatched her under an escort which fell in accidentally with a body of Muḥammadan troops near the caves of Ellora. An engagement resulted in the capture of the princess and her despatch to her mother at Delhi. Her beauty won the heart of Khizr Khán the king's son and the rough course of their love with its hapless termination is celebrated in the Khizr Kháni. When they first met these precocious lovers were respectively ten and eight years of age.
↩The well-known author of the Taríkh i Fíroz Sháhi.
↩Son of Zafar Khán son of Fíróz Sháh.
↩The obscurity of this sentence in the original lies in the elliptical style of Abul Fazl. The sense I have given is in accordance with the facts of Ferishta who says that Malik Marwán Daulát had adopted Sulaimán, and being himself appointed to the government of Multán, was succeeded at his death by his own son Malik Shaikh. The latter dying, made way for Sulaimán who was in turn succeeded by his son Khizr Khán. Ferishta makes the name Marwán and not Mardán.
↩The MSS. omit the negative, but the text supplies it. Ferishta is clear on the point. “He did not take the name of king uor assume any regal epithet.” The title in the text is not mentioned by him, which, however, is somewhat analogous to the Ottoman style of the ‘Babi Aåali’ or Sublime Porte, though in the latter it is absolute, and in the former vicarious.
↩He had laid the foundations of the city of Mubárakábád on the Jumna and was in the habit of visiting it to inspect the progress of the buildings. It was in one of these that he was assassinated at the instigation of the Wazir Sarwar ul Mulk on the 9th Rajab 837 (A. D. 1433). Ferishta.
↩See Vol. I, p. 502.
↩ One MS. reads
His eldest son, the others were Malik Kálá, Malik Fíróz, Malik Muḥammad and Malik Khwájah. Ferishta.
↩Removing the name of Aláu'ddín from the Khutbah, and assuming the insignia of royalty. Ferishta.
↩This story is also told in Ferishta.
↩“Near Bhadáwali, one of the dependencies of Saket,” Ferishta; but Abul Fazl places Bhadauli in the Sarkár of Sahár in the Agra Súbah. It was on his return from Etawah that he was seized with illness. Suketa or Saketa according to the I. G. is one of the classical names borne by Ajodhya, the ancient capital of Oudh. Abul Fazl places Sakeṭh in the Sarkár of Kanauj.
↩He was captured by a body of Gonds. Ferishta.
↩Satgarha is situated 13 miles east of Gugaira on one of the projecting points of the high bank which marks the limits of the windings of the Ravi on the east. The name means ‘seven castles’ but these no longer exist. There is an old brick fort and several isolated mounds which mark the site of an ancient city. Cunuingham, p. 212.
↩
In the maps, according to the text note, Baupúr. The junction is at the south boundary of the Kaparthala state.
↩It is in Kullu proper on the right bank of the Beas in lat. 31° 58' N., and long 77° 7' E, at an elevation of 4,092 feet above sea level. It is perched on a natural eminence, once surrounded by a wall. Only two gateways remain of the ancient fortifications. I. G.
↩Hydraotes of Arrian.
↩Var. Bhadrá It rises in the northern half of the Bangáhal valley in Kangra dist.
↩ Var. Khatwáráh. Another variant
is Kishtwárah and undoubtedly the true
reading. The I. G. places Kistawár in
the Kashmir state, lat. 33° 18' 30" N.,
long 75° 48' E. near the left bank of the
Chenab which here forces its way through
a gorge with precipitous cliffs 1000 feet
high. The course of this river and
details of its volume will be found in
Genl. Cunningham's Ladak and in
Drew's ‘Jummoo and Kashmir’ where
the history of Kishtwár is briefly
sketched. Káshtavára is said by Cunningham
to signify ‘abounding in wood.’
The Chenáb is called Sandabad by Ptolemy
but the Greek historians of Alexander
named it Akesines because its
proper name was of ill omen, from its
similarity thinks Bishop Thirlwall to
For the taxation fixed by Akbar on the districts bordering on the Jhelum, see Vol. I, p. 346, under Bihat. Bidasta and Bihat are corruptions of the Sansk. Vitasta, the Hydaspes of Horace, and the more correct Bidaspes of Ptolemy. The pool of Vira Nág was walled round by Jahangír, but the true source of the river is more to the S.-W. in N. lat. 33° 30' and E. long. 75° 25' Cunningham's Ladák, p. 112.
↩In Sháhpúr dist. lat. 32° 29' N., long. 72° 57' E. The old town was destroyed by hill tribes, the new was founded about 1540, and was the centre of a mahal under Akbar. The ruins of the original city known as Jobnáthnagar are identified by Genl. Cunningham with the capital of Sopheites, contemporary of Alexander the Great.
↩It is so called by the Muḥammadan historians in contradistinction to Katak Benares in Orissa at the opposite extremity of the empire I. G. On his return from Kábul, on the 14th Safar 989 A. H. (20th March 1581), Akbar crossed the Indus at Attock and ordered the building of the fort, of mortar and stone in order to control that part of the country and called it Aṭak which signifies in the vernacular ‘hindrance’ or ‘prohibition,’ it being forbidden to the Hindús to cross the Indus. Ferishta. The Swát territory is here meant, the river of that name, the Suastos of the Greeks (Sansk. Suvastu) rising on the east slopes of the mountains which divide Panjakora from the Swát country, receives the drainage of the Swát valley and entering the Peshawar dist. north of Mlchni, joins the Kábul river at Nisatha. The course of the Indus has there a somewhat parallel direction.
↩Var. Jhat and Chhat, (under list of Sarkárs Chenhat) more commonly known as the Jech or Jechná Doáb.
↩Tieffenthaler quotes other measurements besides these, giving the reason for the variations in the differences of route, the incapacity of travellers and the universal ignorance of geometry.
↩This metal is defined at p. 41 Vol. I. as be composed of 4 sérs of copper to ½ of lead, and in India called Bhangár.
↩Properly, lat. 31° 34' 5" N., long. 74° 21' E.
↩The Great Illusion, or the illusory nature of worldly objects divinely personified, an spithet of the goddess Durgá. The earlier name of Hardwár, Mayapúr, represents the ancient worship of this supreme energy and ‘by her, whose name is Maya,’ says the Bhagavata the Lord made the universe. His temple still exists in Hardwar, and is described in Cunningham's Anct. Geog.
↩The names in the text are incorrectly transliterated.
↩The erudition of Professor Cowell has directed me to the source of this legend which may be read with variation of detail in the preface to the Gopatha Bráhmana published in Nos. 215-252 of the Bibl. Ind. pp. 30-35. It occurs in the 2nd Book in the germ which afterwards developed into the Pauranic tale of Daksha's great sacrifice. This mind-born son of Brahmá and father of Uma or Durga assisted at a Visrasrig sacrifice celebrated by his father in which discourtesy was shown to ´Siva. A quarrel broke out between Daksha and ´Siva, resulting in the exclusion of the latter from the great sacrifice to which the whole Hindú pantheon was bid. Uma seated in her blissful mansion on the crest of the Kailása mountain, saw the crowds proceeding to her father's court to which she repaired and learning the exclusion of her husband, upbraided her father for his injustice and refused to retain the body she had inherited from him. Covering herself up with her robe, she gave up her life in a trance of meditation. The wrath of ´Siva incarnate in a giant form pursued the feasters and created stupendous havoc. Vishnu unable to pacify ´Siva and knowing that his fury was kindled by the sight of his dead wife, cut the body to pieces bit by bit with his discus and threw it about the earth and thus calmed the irate and oblivious deity who thereupon restored the killed and wounded to life and soundness. Daksha's head having been burnt in the melée, it was replaced by that of a goat which happened to be at hand, apparently without remonstrance from the reanimated demigod or even his consciousness of the substitution. The Tantra Chudámani is able fortunately to detail the portions of the body and to identify the places where they fell. As these are said to be still held in high veneration, I record them for the instruction of the curious or the devout.
1. The crown of the head at Hingulá
(Hinglaj). 2. The three eyes at Sarkarára.
3. The nose at Sugandhá. 4.
The top of the neck at Kásmira. 5.
The tongue at Jwálamukhi. 6. Right
breast at Jálandhara. 7. Heart at Vaidyanátha.
8. Knees at Nepála. 9.
Right hand at Mánasa. 10. Navel at
Ukala. 11. Right cheek at Goṇḍakí.
12. Left arm at Vahulá. 13. Elbow
at Ujjayaní. 14. Right arm at Cháttóla,
Chandraṣekhara. 15. Right foot
at Tripurá. 16. Left foot at Triṣrota.
17.
See Hügel's Travels in Kashmír
p. 42, for this phenomenon. The text has
General Cunningham (Ancient Geog. of India, p. 164) says that the Tila range, 30 miles in length, occupies the west bank of the Jhelum from the east bend of the river below Mangala to the bed of the Bunhar river, 12 miles north of Jalálpur. The full name is Goraknáth ka Tila, the more ancient, Bálnath ka Tila, both derived from the temple on the summit dedicated to the sun as Bálnath, but now devoted to the worship of Goraknath, a form of Siva. The name Bálnath, he considers older than the time of Alexander identical with Plutarch's Hill of the Elephant, but his inferences are more plausible than secure.
↩ The spelling of this word has several
variants, but its true orthography seems
to be
Var. Dhaniyát. Compare these names, with the nominal list of Sarkárs and Mahals of Lahor under the ten years' rates.
↩Var. Balukwáh. Palkwárah. (T. do.). Bálkwárah. Text-note says Pálukwáh in maps is north of Mánsawál.
↩Text-note. In maps Bachhertú and in one MS. local force, 2 Cavalry, 10,000 Infantry.
↩Var. Betáli and Khésah. Bálsati and Kanah.
↩See Vol. I, p. 526, a subdiv of Ranghar Rájpúts.
↩Text note: in maps Chanór near the Béas.
↩At p. 110 Dárdak.
↩See Vol. I, p. 456.
↩Var. Saket, Text-note: in maps Saket and Mandi.
↩Var. Sanahwál, Sasnahwál, Sínahwál.
↩One MS. gives this as the revenue.
↩So in the MSS. but text-note gives Gaṛh Diwálah in maps: also in I. G. in Hoshiarpúr Dist.
↩Var. Nurbah, Nurtah, Nurínah.
↩See Vol. I, 526.
↩Var. Alhipúr Malót.
↩Var. Nakródah: in the maps Nakrotah.
↩Text-note suggests Sindhú, as that and Bhalar are two among the very numerous septs of the Jat tribe.
↩Var. Kharli in nominal list of Mahals of this Súbah under ten years Rates which ee.
↩See Cunningham, Anc. Geog. of India, p. 201.
↩Var. Jaṭkar, Hankar, Chankar. G. Jutker.
↩Now known as Núrpúr, according to a text-note, having been so called in the reign of the Emperor Jahángir.
↩Var. Dékar, Darodah Dígar.
↩Var. Gharíbráwan.
↩Text-note, suggests Baghéla.
↩Var. and G. Ghoghowál.
↩Var. Dhanah, Banah, in map Ombah south of Núrpúr.
↩Var. Kariálah, Karbálah.
↩Var. Jarjar.
↩See Vol. I, 456, n. 2.
↩Var. and G. Bijnagar.
↩Var. Bájrah and Bélah, Mahúd and Salah.
↩Var. Badúhindál.
↩Var. Bholrán, Bhoáwan.
↩Var. Barmali.
↩Var. Balínás, Balíhás, Malhás.
↩Var. Bhadán.
↩Var. Jíúḍhaḍi, Jíúdhary, Habúdhadi, G. Jeodhery.
↩Var. Stone.
↩Var. Jaubúhar, Habúhar.
↩The town and palace stand on the south bank of tke river Távi a tributary of the Chenab; the fort overhangs the left or east shore at an elevation of 150 feet above the stream, I. G.
↩Var. and G. Charijíná.
↩Var. Khams, Kíman.
↩Var. Sajhráo, Sanjráo.
↩Var. Jat. Mahjráo.
↩Var. Sháhzádah Sanjrár, Sháhzádah Hinjráo, Shánzdah Sinjráo, (Do. G.).
↩Var. Mahjráo, Sinjráo, Hijráo.
↩Var. Karbari, called Sanibá, Saníár Sásá.
↩Khárak Siharíá, Hárak.
↩See p. 180, Bhérah is on the left bank of the Jhelum. The Bhimbar torrent rising in the second Himalayan range flows within 4 miles N. W. of Gújrát and eventually joins the Jalália nálá a branch of the Chenab. I. G.
↩Var. Bhéawál, Bhadwál.
↩Var. Sakkarwál.
↩Var. Dudwál.
↩Var. Sakan, Masín.
↩Var. Barkhérí. In maps Tark Pari.
↩Ferry receipts.
↩Var. Karan called Halásah, Salásah, Salamah. For Khatar, see Vol. I, 456.
↩ The text has
Var. Sowái. T. Soi but there can be no doubt the Sohán is meant which rising in the Murree Hills passes, according to the I. G. “near the ruined Ghakkar fortress at Pharwála.”
↩Var. Paru, Bhiro, Text note. “Khátar” now comprises Harri Khaṭṭar and Nála Khaṭṭar.
↩Var. Bharchak.
↩The fort built by Shér Sháh as a check on the Gakkhar tribes, now in picturesque ruin. It is situated in the Salt Range on a gorge overlooking the Kuhán Nadi 11 miles north-west of Jhelum town. The walls extend for three miles and encircle the rocks which command the entrance of the pass. Some parts have a thickness of from 30 to 40 feet. One gateway still remains in excellent preservation. I. G.
↩See Vol. I, p. 484, and under Kábul of this volume.
↩Said by Cunningham, (Anct. Geog., p. 163 and pronounced Girjhak) to be the Hindu name for Jalálpúr, the probable site of the famous city of Bukephala built in memory of Alexander's horse.
↩This well-known village lies on the road between Rawal Pindi and Peshawar which with its ruins, says the I. G., forms part of a group of ancient cities lying round the site of the ancient Taxila. Hwen Thsang the Chinese Buddhist pilgrim of the 7th Century A. D. visited the tank of the Serpent King, Elapatra, identified with the spring of Bábá Wali (Kandahári) or Panja Sáhib. The fountain is hallowed by legends of Buddhist, Brahman, Moslem and Síkh. The shrine of Panja Sáhib crowns a precipitous hill about one mile east of the town, and at its foot is the holy tank, a small square reservoir, full of fish. Delapidated brick temples surround the edge and on the west side the water gushes out from beneath a rock made with the representation of a hand, ascribed by the Sikhs to their founder Bábá Nának. The scenery is extremely picturesque; the river Haroh hard by affords excellent fishing, and on its near shore two ancient cypresses are the only epitaph above the tomb of one of Akbar's wives. For Kachakót, see Cunningham, Anct. Geog., p. 116.
↩Var. and G. Faríḳ. Var. and T. Ḳaraḳ.
↩