Search Texts

Ğulām ʿAlī Khān

p. 275

articles in Akbar’s time. ↩ For a detailed description of the Fruitery in India, in Akbar’s time, see Āīn-i-Akbari (Bloch’s Tr., p. 64.) ↩ i.e. , when this history was written (1788

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 325

rise in Chinese territory, a supposition within approximate range of fact. ↩ For the taxation fixed by Akbar on the districts bordering on the Jhelum, see Vol. I, p. 346, under Bihat. Bidasta and

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 410

twenty thousand Akbar Sháhi rupees, the rupee being reckoned at forty dáms. At the present time notwithstanding the remission of various taxes, by the blessing of this ever-during rule, the revenue

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 56

of Akbar in 980 (A. D. 1572), but in 991, he collected a force, defeated Akbar's general and re-ascended the throne. His second reign was brief and the kingdom became a province of the Empire. Málwah

Jahāngīr

p. 228

building of the mosque as follows: VERSE. Nūru-d-dīn Shāh Jahāngīr s. Shāh Akbar Is a king who in the Age hath no equal. He took Fort Kangra by the aid of God. A drop from the cloud of his sword

The History of the Moghuls, Editor's Introduction

Mīrzā Ḥaydar Dughlāt

p. xvi

Akbar- náma. Page 62, line 20. For “Oirát Kalmák” read “Oirát or Kalmák.” Page 80, line 4 of note 1. Omit the last sentence: “Nikudar” is certainly correct. Page 87, note 2. Insert

Mīrzā Ḥaydar Dughlāt

p. xvi

Akbar- náma. Page 62, line 20. For “Oirát Kalmák” read “Oirát or Kalmák.” Page 80, line 4 of note 1. Omit the last sentence: “Nikudar” is certainly correct. Page 87, note 2. Insert

The Dabistān, or School of Manners, Volume 1

[Pseudo-] Muḥsin Fānī

p. xiv

thousand years was believed to be completed under the reign of Akbar. § XII.—THE RELIGION OF THE ILAHIAHS. Akbar was the greatest among the Moghul emperors of India. He began in his fourteenth year

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 189

under one governor called Malik u's Sharḳ. Akbar removed the seat of government to Allahabad, which henceforth superseded Karra in importance” I. G. Karrah is now a ruined town on the right bank

The Muntakhabu-’rukh, Volume 1

Badāʾūnī

p. 8

n 6, 580 and n 5, 581, 592 n 9, 594 and n 6, 596, 597. Akbar Nāma of Shaikh Abu-l-Faẓl ‘Allāmī, 504, 579 n 7. Akbar Shāh, 8 and n 2. See under Akbar. Akchak, a district of Hindūstān, 334 and

The Dīvān of Zeb-un-Nissa (Lal and Westbrook)

Zīb al-Nisāʾ (Makhfī)

p. 7

new style of verse. One of his sons, Mirza Kamran, was also a writer of Persian verse. Although Akbar has given the world no writings of his own—tradition even says that he never found time to learn

The Ain-i-Akbarī, Volume 3

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 1-i

line 6 for Banákiti read Banákati. ” 10 ” 2 ” proferring ” proffering. ” 19n3 and ” 20n1 ” Montulca ” Montucla, ” 21 ” 14 ” dibra ” Libra. ” 24 ” 1 ” Akbár ” Akbar

The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

1398 Volume IV: To the Year A.D. 1450 Volume V: End of the Afghan Dynasty and the First Thirty-Eight Years of the Reign of Akbar Volume VI: Akbar and Jahangir Volume VII: From Shah-Jahan to the Early

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. 314

Mauláná 'Izzu-d dín Khálid-khání; Táríkh-i Írij , by Khwája Nizámu-d dín Ahmad; Táríkh-i Akbar Sháhí , by Mírzá 'Atá Beg Kazwíní; Tuhfat-i Akbar Sháhí , by Shaikh 'Abbás bin

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. 3

D.). 'Abdu-l Hamíd himself says in his preface, that the Emperor desired to find an author who could write the memoirs of his reign in the style of Abú-l Fazl's Akbar-náma ; and that he, 'Abdu-l

The History of India, Volume 1

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. ix

so would be far removed from the Akbar-náma of Abú-l Fazl, which is a special history comprising only the reign of Akbar. A simple chronological succession, irrespective of the general or special

[Pseudo-] Muḥsin Fānī

p. xiv

next earliest date is five years later, 1033 of the Hejira (A. D. 1623). 2 He says that, in his infancy, he came with his friends and relations from Patna to the capital Akbar-abad, and was carried in

Mīr Khvānd

p. 5

both sides been protracted till weariness ensued, most of the friends agreed to appoint Ssiddiq Akbar [ i.e. , Abu Bakr] to the Khalifate and governorship, whereon Bashir B. Sa’d came forward

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. 290

Sind. He then served successively Mirzá Ísá Tarkhán, Ján Bábá, Mirzá Muhammad Bákí, and Mirzá Jání Beg. When this chief went to render his submission to the Emperor Akbar, Khán-i Zamán

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. ix

so would be far removed from the Akbar-náma of Abú-l Fazl, which is a special history comprising only the reign of Akbar. A simple chronological succession, irrespective of the general or special