Search Texts

Mīr Khvānd

p. viii

great Emperor Akbar, who ruled in India from A.D. 1556 to 1605, was also much interested in this matter. Both the ‘Mahabharata’ and the ‘Ramayana,’ the Lilavati, the History of Krishna, and an

Jahāngīr

p. 133

prevailed upon to issue an ordinance in conformity with his views, he would engage to make good to the imperial treasury the zekkaut of the empire, such as it was in the time of my father Akbar, to

Abū al-Fażl ʿAllāmī

p. 1-i

line 6 for Banákiti read Banákati. ” 10 ” 2 ” proferring ” proffering. ” 19n3 and ” 20n1 ” Montulca ” Montucla, ” 21 ” 14 ” dibra ” Libra. ” 24 ” 1 ” Akbár ” Akbar

Davvānī

p. 416

letters some very heavy imposts on moveables which Akbār had given up. The same Akbār, in one of his letters to Abul Fazal, casually mentions with disapprobation the rigorous and petty taxation of

Mīr Khvānd

p. 598

mosque. On his right hand rode Ssiddyq Akbar [ i.e. , Abu Bakr], and on his left Asyd B. Khadzyr, with Ballâl B. Ryâh and O’thmân B. Ttolhah, all of whom attended on the heaven-aspiring stirrup

E. G. Browne

p. 391

India, the representatives of which, commonly known in Europe as the “Great Moguls,” included such noble princes as Humáyún, Akbar, Jahángír, Sháh-Jahán and Awrang-Zíb 'Álamgír, and which

Šīr Henry M. Elliot

p. 482

confinement in the fort, and raised to the sovereignty, a person named Nekú Siyar, 482 a son of Prince Muhammad Akbar, and grandson of Aurangzeb. His accession was announced by peals of cannon, and

E. G. Browne

p. 381

sh-Shí'a (“Beliefs of the Shí'a”) composed during the reign of Muḥammad Sháh Qájár (before the middle of the nineteenth century of our era) by a certain 'Alí Aṣghar ibn 'Alí Akbar, and

Mīr Khvānd

p. 648

said: ‘My wives are on my neck. They ask for money, and want things which I do not possess.’ These words so excited Ssiddyq Akbar that he rose and struck the neck of [his daughter] A’ayshah with

The History of Asafu'd Daulah, a Translation of Tafzihu'l Ghafilin

Abū Ṭālib Khān Iṣfahānī

p. 27

employment he was guilty of embezzlement, and was imprisoned during the life of the late Nawáb, but after his death was released and became servant of Akbar Ali Khán, dárogah of Mukhtáru’d

The Literary History of Persia, Volume 3

E. G. Browne

p. 132

mentioned, by the teachings of “the most great doctor” ( ash-Shaykhu'l-akbar ) Muḥiyyu'd-Dín ibnu'l-'Arabí, by origin of the famous Arabian tribe of Ṭayy, and by birth a Moor of Andalusia

The Rauzat-us-Safa (Rehatsek), Part 2, Volume 2

Mīr Khvānd

p. 530

be slain.’ But he had not yet departed this life when Moseylamah, the liar of Yamâmah, claimed to be a prophet, and was killed during the Khalifate of Ssiddyq Akbar, 348 as shall be narrated in

[Pseudo-] Muḥsin Fānī

p. 145

the year 1033 of the Hejira (1623 A. D.), the author of this work, then in his infancy, came with his friends and relations from Patna to the capital, Akbár abad, and was brought in the arms of the

Niẓāmī Ganjavī

p. xv

Bukhára, lived at Akbár-ábád (Agra), in India. Calcutta, 1833, p. 54. ( d ) ◌ “The Fire Temple of Ázar,” by Hájí Luṭf 'Alí Ázar, born A.H. 1134. Calcutta, 1833, p. 318. ( e

Mīrzā Kalichbeg Fredunbeg

p. 335

Sálih 153 Akbar 136 Akhtiar Khán 199, 200 Ákhund Bachal 227, 230 Alahábád 155, 157, 238 Alah Bakhsh 167, 168 Alah Bakhsh Jhinjan 169, 171—175, 194 Alahdád (Líkhí) 186, 188, 198 Alahyár

Ṭīpū Sulṭān

p. 445

Akbar Ali Khân, Mahommed Othman, and other chiefs, charged with letters and presents, have set out [for Pondicherry ], where they will [in due time] safely arrive. We have no doubt that you will take

The Story of Valeh and Hadijeh

Faqīr Dihlavī

p. 13

monarchy shattered to pieces, and the streets of his native town red with the blood of the princes and nobles of his country. He had seen in Delhi, the descendant of Ghenghiz and Akbar, the Emperor of

Badāʾūnī

p. 220

of the Ganges Lat. 25° 41' N. Long. 81° 24' E. ( see Hunter, Imp. Gaz. ) Vol. VIII. Before Akbar's time Karrah was the seat of government. ↩ Qāẓī Jalālu-d-Dīn Kāsānī ( Ṭabaqāt-i

Niẓāmī Ganjavī

p. 442

campaign against the Persians. From Arabic and Turkish historians we learn that the inhabitants of the Caucasus attribute its construction to Iskandar Zú-l-Ḳarnain-i-Akbar (not Alexander the Great

Mīrzā Kalichbeg Fredunbeg

p. vii

truthful, who have been called the scavengers of the corruptions of civilisation, but who gave India an Akbar, and to Sindh the Arghun and Tarkhan dynasties. When, in 1162, in a small tent on the