On the third of the month of Muḥarram of the year one thousand and four (1004) Ḥakím Ḥasan Gílání (P. 404), who was of a very dervish-like character, and kind, and possessed of excellent qualities, departed this life:—

“If a Rose were possible without a Thorn,
Every moment in this world would be a new delight;
We should be happy enough in this old caravansarai of Life,
If Death were not always at the door.”

At this time Shaikh Músá Gílání Qádirí, son of the Master, Shaikh Ḥámid (God sanctify his tomb!), younger brother of Shaikh 'Abd-ul Qádir* who is a devotee at Uchh, chose to do homage to the Emperor, and was raised to the rank of Commander of five hundred.

During this month Çadr Jahán, the Muftí of the imperial domi­nions, who has been appointed to a commandership of One Thousand, joined the Divine Faith, as also his two foolish sons; and having taken the Shaçt* of the new religion, he went into the snare like a fish, and so got his commandership of One Thousand. He even asked His Majesty what he was to do with his beard, when he was told to let it be. On the same day Mullá Taqí of Shustar joined, who looks upon himself as the learned of the learned, and is just now engaged in rendering the Sháhnámah into prose in accordance with the Em­peror's orders, and whenever the word ‘Sun’ occurs he uses such phrases as jallat 'azamatuhu and 'azza shánuhu.* Among others that joined was a Shaikhzádah, one Gosálah Khán by name, of Banáras, (but what good can be expected from a zádah!)* and Mullá Sháh Múḥammad of Sháhábád, and Çúfí Aḥmad musician of the Masnad-i-Çád of Dihlí, who claimed to belong to the progeny of his holiness Ghaus-us-saqalain (God be favourable to him!):—

“Alidís cub is like it;
How art thou like a prophet? say!”

They all conformed to the four degrees of the Faith, and received appointments as Commanders of from One Hundred to Five Hun­dred. They gave up their beards in the earnest pursuit of the new religion, and became hairless and beardless, and “Some shavers”* was found to give the date. These new-religionists behaved like Hindús turned Musalmáns, and like one who is dressed in red clothes, and in his conceit looks at his relatives, who say to him (P. 405):—

“My little man, these rags will be old to-morrow,
But the Islám will still remain on your neck.”

Aḥmad “the little Çúfí” is the same who claimed to be the pupil, or rather the perfect successor of Shaikh Aḥmad Bikrí of Egypt. He said, that at the express desire of that religious leader of the age he had come to India, and the Shaikh had frequently told him, to assist the Sulṭán of India, should he make a slip, and to lead him back from his place of danger. But the opposite was the result:—

“A boastful spider said: I am so very clever,
That it would be only right if to-morrow I were made “Weaver by appointment to the Houris.”
Hast not heard what another spider said to him?
Brother, why boast? first weave, then boast!”

The issue of the affair of Gosálah Banárasí, who was a catamite of “a calf in bodily shape, and lowing,”* was as follows: Through the intervention of Shaikh Abu-l-Fazl he was brought into proximity to the Emperor, and by deceit and trickery getting himself made Krorí of Banáras he managed to leave the Court. He in company with Aḥmad the little Çúfí set his eyes on a certain prostitute, and having left a considerable sum of money with her appointed a guardian over her, and went away. When the overseers of the prostitutes and dancing-girls represented this to the Emperor, one night at the New Year's assembly he allowed the matter to transpire, and took away the jágír of Two-Hundred from Aḥmad Suflí,* and Mullá Sháh Muḥammad, which they held conjointly in the skirts of the moun­tains, and recalled Gosálah of Banáras.

On the tenth of the month of Çafar* of this year the King of Poets, Shaikh Faizí, after suffering for a long time from conflicting diseases, viz., from the trouble of a difficulty in breathing, and from dropsy and swelling of the hands and feet, and from a vomiting of blood, which he had borne for six months, passed from this world And since he had, in despite of Mussalmáns, associated and been mixed up with dogs day and night, they say that at the moment of (P. 406) death they heard him bark like a dog. And through his bigotry in the matter of heresy and denial of the religion of Islám, he involuntarily at that moment even in the presence of men of learning, lawyers and ascetics, uttered meaningless words and such foolish gibberish, and stuff and nonsense, and unbelief in religious matters, as he was accustomed to, and in which he had formerly so persisted. At length he went to his own place, and a mnemosynon for the date is “Woe to the heretic, and Shi'ah, and natural-philo­sopher, and the worldly man;” and another “The pillar of heresy is broken.”* And one of his friends invented this mnemosynon:—

“Seest thou what a number of tricks the Heaven plays,
The bird of my heart out of its cage became a nightingale.
That bosom, which treasured in itself a whole world,
Became too contracted to draw half a breath.”

At the time of his last agony the Emperor came in the middle of the night and took up his head and caressed it. Several times he cried out and said: “O Shaikh Jí I have brought Ḥakím 'Ali* with me, why do you say nothing?” But since he was unconscious no voice or sound proceeded from him. When the Emperor had repeatedly questioned him, he cast his turban on the ground.* And after he had given some words of sympathy to Shaikh Abu-l-Fazl the Em­peror went away. Just about this time news was brought that Faizí had breathed his last.—“O God make us firm, make us to die and raise us again in the Faith and the Islám!”

A few days after this event Ḥakím Humán died on the sixth of Rabí'-ul-awwal,* and on the seventh Kamáláí Çadr passed away. The riches of both of these were at once [confiscated and] locked up in chambers, so that they were too poor to afford themselves a shroud.

These are some of the events of various dates, which in the month of Çafar (may God conclude it in happiness and success!) of the year one thousand (P. 407) and four (1004) of the era of the Hijrah, which corresponded to the fortieth from the Accession, were written down in a concise form by the shikastah pen of this broken-hearted one, and without reservation have been strung unceremoniously on the string of narration. But, although with respect to details it is but as a bubble from the sea of Umán,* or like a drop from the clouds or the rain, everything that I have written is as far as I am conscious deliberately guarded from every trace of error, unless (God's will be done!) in the case of some years a postdating or antedating, or inversion or alteration may have crept into the original sources, which is not the business of the compiler. And if my span of life give me a little assistance, and the divine grace be my com­panion, and my brain have leisure from other occupations (if the glorious God will) I will write also a compendium of the events of the years to come. And if not, any one, who is an inhabitant of India, can after us compose a rough epitome, for such has always been the Law of God:—

“My object has been to give good advice, I have spoken,
I commit it to God, and go my way.”
NOTES.

Page 10, ll. 12-14. These lines should be,

“Is life's one lesson to the wise;
That man an arrant fool doth live
Who leaves his money when he dies.”

P. 14, ll. 5, 6. These lines should be—

“Of earth or man there was no trace upon the board of life,
When in love's school my soul from thee first learned its passion's art.”

P. 24, note 3. Instead of “Probably the Díván-i-Ḥáfiz, for” read Our author means the Díván-i-Ḥáfiz. Ouseley in his Lives of the Persían Poets says that the terms lisán-i-ghaib, and tarjumân-ul-asrár were first applied to Ḥáfiz by Jámí.

P. 37. For note2 substitute, “the phrase dar wádí-i means ‘in the subject of,’ see text, p. 185, l. 3, infra, p. 187, l. 4 and 14, p. 305, l. 10.”

P. 45. Add to note5 “the passage may refer to the zikr-í arrah, a mode of saying ḥaqq without moving the tongue, see Vullers, i. 964 a.”

P. 53. Add to note2—“Compare infra, p. 294, note.”

P. 73, ll. 1—5. This passage should run

“In this year the Shaikh-ul-Islám, Fatḥ-púrí Chishtí,—who in the year 971 had returned from Mekkah and Madínah, and for the date of whose return the author of this history had discovered two mnemosyna and included them in an Arabic letter which he wrote and sent him from Badáún, which will be given in its proper place if God, He is exalted, will,—laid.”

P. 105, l. 29. See supra, p. 67.

P. 118, l. 22. This line may mean