SULṬA´N MURA´D. He was married to a daughter of Mírzá 'Azíz Kokah (p. 325). Their child, Sulṭán Rustam, did not live long (Akbarn. III, 539, 552).

SULṬA´N DA´NYA´L. The correct date of his birth seems to be the 2nd Jumáda I, 979, not the 10th; but the MSS. continually confound <Arabic> and <Arabic>. His first wife was a daughter of Sulṭán Khwájah (p. 423), by whom he had a daughter of the name of Sa'ádat Bánú Begum, who was born in 1000 (Akbarn. III, 643).

Page 310.

JAHA´NGI´R'S WIVES. An additional list was given on p. 477, note 2. Besides them, I may mention, (1) a daughter of Mubárak Chak of Kashmír; (2) a daughter of Husain Chak of Kashmír (Akbarn. III, 659); (3) another Kashmírí lady, mentioned in Akbarn. III, 639.

I stated on p. 309, that Jahángír's mother was called Jodh Bái. This is wrong. Jodh Bái was the wife of Jahángír and daughter of Mot'h Rájah of Jodhpúr. There is little doubt that Jahángír's mother (the Maryam uzzamání) is the daughter of Rájah Bihárí Mall and sister to Rájah Bhagwán Dás.

Page 314, last line.

DEATH OF MI´RZA´ RUSTAM. Thus the date is given in the Maásir ul Umará; but from the Pádisháhnámah (II, 302) we see that Mírzá Rustam died on, or a few days before, the 1st Rabí' I., 1052. The author adds a remarks that “the manners (auzá') of the Mírzá did not correspond to his noble birth, which was perhaps due to the absence of nobility in his mother.”

Page 315, line 11.

QARA´QU´ILU TURKS. The correct name is Qaráqoinlü. The Calcutta Chaghtái Dic­tionary gives Qaráqúnílü. Vambéry (History of Bokhárá, p. 265, note) mentions the Ustajlü, Shámlü, Nikallü, Bahárlü, Zulqadr, Kájar, and Afshár, as the principal Turkish tribes that were living in Transcaucasia, on the southern shore of the Caspian and in the west of Khurásán. Qaráqoinlü means ‘the black sheep tribe.’

Page 317, note 1.

The correct name of the place where Bairam was defeated is Gúnáchúr, <Arabic>, which lies S. E. of Jálindhar. The word <Arabic>, which the Bibl. Indica Edition of Badáoní gives, contains ‘Phillaur,’ which lies S. W. of Gúnáchúr.

Page 324, note 1.

I do not think that Pír Muhammad came from the Sharwán mentioned in this note. It is more likely that he was a Shirwání Afghán.

Page 325, note.

This note has been corrected on p. 406, line 10, and p. 416, note 1.

Page 329, line 8 from below.

ZULQADR, is the name of a Turkmán tribe; vide above.

Page 339, last line.

GOGANDAH. Regarding the correct date of the battle vide p. 418, note 2.

Page 351.

TODAR MALL. The Maásir ul Umará says that Todar Mall was born at Láhor. But it is now certain that Todar Mall was born at Láharpúr, in Audh; vide Proceed­ings, Asiatic Society, Bengal, September 1871, p. 178.

Page 372, note.

MIYA´N KA´L. The note is to be cancelled. Miyán Kál has been explained on p. 545, note.

Page 373, line 22.

YU´SUF KHA´N. Regarding his death vide Tuzuk, p. 328. His son 'Izzat Khán is wrongly called in the Bibl. Indica Edition of the Pádisháhnámah (I, b., p. 302) <Arabic>. His name was 'Azíz ullah; hence his title 'Izzat.

Page 379, last line.

QA´SIM KHA´N. I dare say, the phrase ‘Chamanárái Khurásán’ merely means that he was Governor of Kábul.

Page 381, line 14.

BA´QI´ KHA´N. He is often called ‘Khán Báqí Khán.’

Page 389, line 1.

MI´R BA´BU´S. The spelling ‘Uigur’ is now common; but in India the word is pro­nounced ‘I´ghur.’ The query may be cancelled; vide p. 441, note.

Page 398, line 10.

DASTAM KHA´N. Vambéry spells ‘Dostum.’

Page 413.

SHAIKH FARI´D I BUKHA'RI´. That the name of Faríd's father was Sayyid Ahmad i Bukhárí, may be seen from the short inscription on the ‘Bukhárí Mosque’ in the town of Bihár, which was built by Shaikh Láḍ, at the cost of Faríd i Bukhárí, and bears the date 16th Rajab, 1017.

Mr. J. G. Delmerick has sent me the following inscription from Faríd's Jámi' Masjid in Farídábád,—

<Arabic>

1. In the reign of Sháh Núruddín, a king who is pious, just, and liberal,

2. Murtazá Khán, the unique one (faríd) of the age and faith, erected this religious building.

3. He is honored, powerful, generous, and liberal, a worthy descendant of the king of men ['Alí].

4. As Táríkh of this lasting structure, the words Khair ul Biqá' issued from the pen.

This gives 1014, A. H.

Page 424, line 24.

KHWA´JAH ṬA´HIR MUHAMMAD. He is mentioned as a Sijistání on p. 528, among the Bakhshís.

Page 431, note 1.

MA'ÇU´M KHA´N KA´BULI´. This rebel, who gave Akbar no end of trouble, had the audacity to assume royal prerogatives in Bengal. The following inscription I received, through Bábu Rájendrála Mitra, from Rájah Pramatha Náth, Rájah of Díghaputi, Rájsháhí. It was found in a ruined mosque at a village, called Chatmohor, not very far from Dighaputi.

<Arabic>

This lofty mosque was built during the time of the great Sulṭán, the chief of Sayyids, Abul Fath Muhammad Ma'çúm Khán—May God perpetuate his kingdom for ever, O Lord, O Thou who remainest! by the high and exalted Khán, Khán Muhammad, son of Túí Muhammad Khán Qáqshál, in the year 989.

This was, therefore, nearly two years after the outbreak of the Bengal Military Revolt (9th Zí Hajjah, 987); vide p. 439.

Page 438, line 13.

SAYYID MUHAMMAD. Regarding the correct date of his death, vide p. 490.

Page 450, line 14.

SU´RAT. There is every probability that Sorat'h, and not Súrat, is intended.

Page 456.

THE GAKK'HARS. Vide pp. 486, 487.

The places Pharwálah and Dángalí (<Arabic>, not Dangálí) mentioned in the note as the principal places in the Gakk'har District, are noticed in E. Terry's ‘Voyage to East India’ (London, 1655, p. 88). “Kakares, the principal Cities are called Dekalee and Púrhola; it is a large Province, but exceeding mountainous; divided it is from Tartaria by the Mountain Caucasus; it is the extremest part North under the Mogol's subjection.”

De Laët also gives the same passage.

Page 460, line 2.

YARA´Q KHA´N. The correct name is, I believe, Boráq Khán. Vide Vambéry's ‘Bokhara’, p. 153.

Page 493, line 10.

KU´CH HA´JO. Regarding Kúch Hájo and Kúch Bihár and Mukarram Khán, vide my article on these countries in Journal, Asiatic Society, Bengal, for 1872, p. 54.

Page 493, line 21.

GHAZNI´N KHA´N, of Jálor.

“The Pahlunpúr family is of Afghán origin, belonging to the Lohání tribe, and, it is said, occupied Bihár in the reign of Humáyún. They subsequently took service with the king of Dihlí; and from Akbar Sháh, in A. D. 1597, Ghaznín Khán, the chief, obtained the title of Díwán, for having successfully repulsed an invasion of Afghán tribes; for his services on this occasion, he was also rewarded with the govern­ment of Láhor. In A. D. 1682, Fath Khán Díwán received the province of Jálor, Sánchor, Pahlunpúr, and Dísah from Aurangzíb. Fath Khán died in 1688, leaving an only son, Pír Khán, who was supplanted in his rights by his uncle Kamál Khán, who, subsequently, being unable to withstand the increasing power of the Rát'hors of Máṛwáṛ, was compelled, in A. D. 1698, to quit the country [Jálor], and retire with his family and dependants to Pahlunpúr, where the family has remained ever since.— Selections, Bombay Government Records, No. XXV.—New Series, p. 15.

Page 508, line 13 from below.

WAÇLI´. This is wrong, and should be Hijrí. Khwájah Muhammad Sharíf, as correctly stated in the genealogical tree on p. 512, had two sons. The eldest is A´ghá Muhammad Ṭáhir, whose nom-de-plume is Waçlí, and Ghiás Beg.

Page 524, line 20.

ALI´ QULI´ BEG ISTAJLU´. Vambéry spells Ustajlú, which is the name of a Turkish tribe; vide p. 619.