In this above list, a few grandees are mentioned whom Abulfazl classes among the commanders of 400. Nizám, however, adds the following note to his own list—“Let it be known that the title of Amír is given to all such as hold Mançabs from 500 upwards. None of those whom I have enumerated holds a less rank.”
The Historian Badáoní has not given a list of Amírs, but has compiled instead a very valuable list of the poets, doctors, learned men, and saints of Akbar's reign, together with biographical notices, which make up the third volume of the edition printed by the Asiatic Society of Bengal. With his usual animus he says (III. 1,)—“I shall not give the names of the Amírs, as Nizám has given them in the end of his work, and besides, most of them have died without having obtained the pardon of God.
Of the Mançabdárs whose names Abulfazl has not given, because the A´ín list refers to the period prior to the 40th year of Akbar's reign, the most famous are Mahábat Khán, Khán Jahán Lodí (p. 503), and 'Abdullah Khán Fírúz-jang.
We have no complete list of the grandees of Jahángír's reign; but the Dutch traveller De Laët, in his work on India (p. 151), has a valuable note on the numerical strength of Jahángír's Mançabdárs, which may be compared with the lists in the A´ín and the Pádisháhnámah (II., 717). Leaving out the princes, whose mançabs were above 5000, we have—
Commanders of | Under Akbar. (A´ín) | Under Jahángír. (De Laët) | Under Sháhjahán (Pádisháhnámah) |
5000 | 30 | 8 | 20 |
4500 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
4000 | 9 | 25 | 20 |
3500 | 2 | 30 | 0 |
3000 | 17 | 36 | 44 |
2500 | 8 | 42 | 11 |
2000 | 27 | 45 | 51 |
1500 | 7 | 51 | 52 |
1250 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1000 | 31 | 55 | 97 |
900 | 38 | 0 | 23 |
800 | 2 | 0 | 40 |
700 | 25 | 58 | 61 |
600 | 4 | 0 | 30 |
500 | 46 | 80 | 114 |
——— | ——— | ——— | |
Total, | 249 | 439 | 563 |
——— | ——— | ——— | |
400 | 18 | 73 | |
350 | 19 | 58 | |
300 | 33 | 72 | not specified. |
250 | 12 | 85 | |
200 | 81 | 150 | |
——— | —— | ||
Total, | 163 | 438 | |
——— | —— | ||
150 | 53 | 242 | |
120 | 1 | 0 | |
100 | 250 | 300 | |
80 | 91 | 245 | not specified. |
60 | 204 | 397 | |
50 | 16 | 0 | |
40 | 260 | 298 | |
30 | 39 | 240 | |
20 | 250 | 232 | |
10 | 224 | 110 | |
——— | ——— | ||
Total, | 1388 | 2064 | |
——— | ——— |
The number of Ahadís under Jahángír, De Laët fixes as follows—
Chaháraspahs, | 741 | |
Sihaspahs, | 1322 | |
Duaspahs, | 1428 | |
Yakaspahs, | 950 | |
——— | ||
4441 | Ahadís. |
Under Sháhjahán, 17 Grandees were promoted, up to the 20th year of his reign, to mançabs above 5000. There is no Hindú among them.
De Laët has not mentioned how many of the Amírs were Hindús. But we may compare the lists of the A´ín and the Pádisháhnámah.
We find under Akbar—
among 252 mançabdárs from 5000 to 500 | 32 | Hindús |
” 163 ” from 400 to 200 | 25 | Do. |
Under Sháhjahán (20th year of his reign), we have—
among 12 mançabdárs above 5000 | no | Hindús. |
” 580 ” from 5000 to 500 | 110 | Do. |
The names of commanders below 500 are not given in the Pádisháhnámah. Regarding other facts connected with the relative position of Hindús and Muhammadans at the Mughul court, I would refer the reader to my ‘Chapter from Muhammadan History,’ Calcutta Review, April, 1871.