I WOULD lay before the wise and critical that I, the least of God's servants, Muhammad Haidar, known among my intimates as Mirzá Haidar, son of Muhammad Husain Kurkán, have been continually possessed of the thought that the rank and dignity which historians attain to, is not so high that one should have a craving for it. Still, there can be little doubt that this poor history (which has been driven by the whirlwind of pride and the waves of ignorance and intoxication, from the sea of incapacity upon the shores of small literary attainment) may be regarded as of some value by the divers in the ocean of excellence, who have concealed in the shells of perfection, the pearls of poetry and the precious stones of prose. According to the saying: “Necessity makes lawful that which is forbidden,” and because certain important events in the annals of the Moghul Khákáns have been entirely forgotten, I was induced, as far as time should permit, to narrate some of the most trustworthy facts in their history.
When the Moghul power was high, many eminent men flourished,
and some wrote their people's history. Now, for more than a
hundred years nothing of the sort has been done—no trace of these
men remains, nor of their writings. Nor does any sign remain of
their prosperity and civilisation, except here and there a ruined
tower or fortification; and in some towns the relics of a
monastery, a college, a mosque, a portico, or a minaret, still exist,
because their foundations being of stone, or for some other reason,
God willed that they should endure. No vestige of these men
survives and no one knows anything concerning them. For
during this long lapse of time, all have become strangers to the
old customs and ways of learning. Since the conversion of the
Moghuls to Islám, more especially, no history of them has been
written. But the learned men of Mávará-un-Nahr and Khorásán
and Irák, who have written the annals for their own kings, have
made mention of the Moghuls, just where it has suited the context,
while they have paid no attention to them when not connected
with their own country. Among these histories may be mentioned
the Mujma ut Tavárikh*
of Khwája Rashid-ud-Din; the Tárikh-i-