A few words must be said about her age at the time of her marriage, because the question has been raised through Jahāngīr's statement that she died at the age of sixty in 1021H., and commented upon by the Darbār-i-akbarī. If Jahāngīr gives her age correctly she must have been born in 961H., and this would make her a child of five when she married Bairām, and needs her betrothal by her father to Bairām to date from babyhood.

The Darbār-i-akbarī says that it is clear from Jahāngīr's statement of her age at death that she was married to Bairām ætat. 5, and that her memory is thus cleared from the reproach of two marriages!

Whatever is concealed in Jahāngīr's ‘sixty,’ nothing is said to indicate that he desired to bring Salīma-sulān into the circle of Hindū propriety. He may have had the wish; he was a Hindū mother's son. The comment of the modern author of the Darbār-i- akbarī witnesses to the Hindūizing action to which Moslim custom and thought have submitted. Adult remarriage was no reproach to Islām in Salīma's day.

It does not, however, seem correct to accept Jahāngīr's statement that Salīma-sulān was sixty only at death To have betrothed her as a baby and to have married her to a man of, at least, middle-age at five, is not in harmony with the Muḥammad custom of Ḥumāyūn's day. Moreover, Jahāngīr himself speaks of her as married (kad-khudā) to Bairām. She is said by Abū'l-faẓl to have been betrothed (nāmzād) by Humāyūn, and married (sipurdan) by Akbar to Bairām Khān.

Badāyunī's words indicate adult and not child marriage; sābiqā dar ḥabāla-i-Bairām Khān Khān-i-khānān būd, b'ad azān dakhl-i-ḥaram-i-pādshāhī shūd.

After the murder of Bairām in 968H. Salīma-sulān was married by Akbar. She was probably a few years his senior.

In 983H. she made her pilgrimage with Gul-badan. Particulars of the expedition are given in the Intro­duction to this volume.

Her name appears in the histories as a reader, a poet who wrote under the pseudonym of makhfī, and as pleading with Akbar for Salīm's forgiveness.

Her death is chronicled by Jahāngīr who heard of it on Ẕū'l-qa'da 2nd, 1021H. (December 15th, 1612). He gives particulars of her birth and descent, and of her marriages; and he states that she was sixty at the time of her death. By his orders her body was laid in a garden which she herself had made.

Jahāngīr praises her both for her natural qualities and her acquirements. She creates an impression of herself as a charming and cultivated woman.

Gul-badan, (?)26a.

Akbar-nāma s.n..

Badāyunī, Lowe, 13, 216, 389.

Tūzūk-i-jahāngīrī, Sayyid Ahmad, Aligarh, 113.

Khāfī Khān, Bib. Ind. ed., I. 276.

Āīn-i-akbarī, Blochmann, s.n..

Darbār-i-akbarī, 736.

The genealogical table on the next page illustrates Salīma-sulān's descent, and the following dates bear also upon the topic:

Pāshā married Maḥmūd 873H.—1469.
Bayasanghar born 882H.—1477.
Maḥmūd died 900H.—Jan. 1495
Bābar married Zainab, d. of Maḥmūd 910H.—1504.
Zainab died 913H.-914H.—1507-8.
Sālḥa's child, the wife of Nūru-d-dīn, was not born in 911H.—1511, because she is not in the list of children who left Kābul with Bābar in that year. (Gul-badan, 7a.)

CLXXI. Salīma Khānam Chaghatāī Mughal.

Daughter of Khiẓr Khwājā, but whether also of Gul-badan is not recorded.

She went with Gul-badan to Makka in 983H. (1575).

Āīn-i-akbarī, Blochmann, 441.

CLXXII. Salīqa-sulān Begam (Āq Begam) Mīrān-shāhī.

(Ilminsky, 25, reads Ṣālḥa.) The princess of excel­lent disposition; Ar. salīqa, of good disposition, and sulān, pre-eminence.

Daughter of Sulān Aḥmad Mīrzā Mīrān-shāhī and Qūtūq (Katak) Begam; wife of her cousin Ma'sūd. The marriage was announced to Bābar in 900H. (1494) with gifts of gold and silver, almonds, and pistachios. She was captured by Abū-bakr Dughlāt with Shāh Begam and Mihr-nigār Khānam.

Mems., 22, 27.

CLXXIII. Sāmiḥa Begam Barlās.

The gentle princess; Ar. sāmiḥ, gentle.

Daughter of Muḥibb 'Alī Barlās (son of Niāmu-d­dīn 'Alī Khalīfa), and presumably of Nāhīd Begam; mother of Mujāhid Khān.

Mujāhid (who is named in the abaqāt-i-akbarī as commander of 1,000, but is not in the Āīn) was a son