Muntaḫab al-tavārīḫ - The Muntakhabu-’rukh, Volume 3

Selections from Histories

Text ID: 003601023 View Author
CONTENTS.
PAGE
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE v
CHAPTER I 1
     I.MIYĀN ḤĀTIM OF SAMBHAL 3
II.SHAIKH JALĀLU'-D-DĪN OF THĀNESAR 5
III.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD GHAUṮ OF GWĀLIYĀR 7
IV.SHAIKH BURHĀN 10
V.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD-I-KAMBŪ, OF SAMBHAL. 12
VI.SHAIKH FAKHRU-'D-DĪN 13
VII.SHAIKH ‘AZĪZU-'LLĀH 14
VIII.SHAIKH SALĪM-I-CISHTĪ 18
IX.SHAIKH NIẒĀMU-'D-DĪN OF AMBEṬHĪ 27
X.SHAIKH BHĪKAN OF KĀKŌRĪ 41
XI.SHAIKH SA‘DĪ 42
XII.SAYYID TĀJU-'D-DĪN, OF LAKHNAU 43
XIII.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD QALANDAR OF LAKHNAU 43
XIV.SHAIKH NIẒĀMU-'D-DĪN 44
XV.SHAIKHU-'L-HIDYA OF KHAIRĀBĀD 45
XVI.SHAIKH DĀ‘ŪD OF CHATĪ 47
XVII.SHAIKH ABAN OF AMROHA 63
XVIII.KHĀJA ‘ABDU-'SH-SHAHĪD 65
XIX.SHAIKH ADHAN OF JAUNPŪR 66
XX.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'L-GHAFŪR OF A‘ẒAMPŪR 69
XXI.MIYĀṄ VAJĪHU-'D-DĪN OF AḤMADĀBĀD 70
XXII.MIYĀṄ ‘ABDU-'LLĀH NIYĀZĪ OF SIRHIND 73
XXIII.SHAIKH ABŪ-'L-FATḤ OF GUJARĀT 77
XXIV.SHAIKH ABŪ ISḤĀQ OF LĀHŌR 79
XXV.SHAIKH RUKNU-'D-DĪN 82
XXVI.MIYĀṄ MUṢṬAFā OF GUJARĀT 83
XXVII.SHAIKH ISḤĀQ-I-KĀKŪ OF LĀHŌR 85
XXVIII.SHAIKH SA‘DU-'LLĀH BANĪ ISRĀ'ĪL 87
XXIX.MIYĀṄ SHAIKH ‘ABDU-‘LLĀH OF BADĀON 90
XXX.SHAIKH JALĀLU-'D-DĪN OF QANNAUJ 93
XXXI.SHAIKH KAPŪR-I-MAJZŪB 95
XXXII.SHAIKH ALLĀH 96
XXXIII.SHAIKH ‘ĀRIF-I-ḤUSAINĪ 98
XXXIV.MĪR SAYYID ‘ALĀ'U-'D-DĪN OF AWADH 101
XXXV.SHAIKH ḤAMZAH OF LAKHNAU 103
XXXVI.SHAIKH PĪRAK 104
XXXVII.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD ḤUSAIN OF SIKANDRA 105
XXXVIII.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-L-WĀHID OF BILGRĀM 106
CHAPTER II. AN ACCOUNT OF THE LEARNED MEN, MOST OF WHOM THE AUTHOR
HAS MET, OR FROM WHOM HE HAS RECEIVED INSTRUCTION
109
I.SHAIKH ḤĀTIM OF SAMBHAL 109
II.MAULĀNĀ ‘ABDU-'LLĀH OF SULṬĀNPŪR 113
III.SHAIKH MUBĀRAK OF NĀGŌR 118
IV.MĪR SAYYID MUḤAMMAD, Mīr-i-‘Adl.OF AMROHA. 120
V.SHAIKH GADĀ'Ī OF DIHLĪ, THE KAMBŪ 122
VI.MIYĀṄ JAMĀL KHĀN, MUFTI OF DIHLĪ 123
VII.QĀẒĪ JALĀLU-'D-DĪN OF MULTĀN 124
VIII.QĀẒĪ ṬAWĀ'ISĪ 125
IX.QĀẒĪ YA‘QŪB OF MĀNIKPŪR 126
X.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'N-NABĪ 127
XI.SHAIKH AḤMADĪ FAYYĀẒ, OF AMBĒṬHI 131
XII.QĀẒĪ ṢADRU-'D-DĪN, SOME TIME OF JALANDAR, AFTERWARDS OF LĀHOR 133
XIII.MIYĀṄ ILĀHDĀD OF LAKHNAU 134
XIV.MĪR SAYYID JALĀLU-'D-DĪN-I-QĀDIRĪ 135
XV.SHAIKH ḤUSAIN OF AJMER 136
XVI.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'L-QĀDIR 141
XVII.SHAIKH KABĪR 143
XVIII.MĪR SAYYID ‘ALĪ OF LŪDHIĀNA 144
XIX.SHAIKH MU‘ĪN 147
XX.MĪR ‘ABDU-'L-LAṬĪF OF QAZVĪN 148
XXI.KHĀJA MUḤAMMAD YAḤYā 150
XXII.SHAIKH ḤUSAIN OF BADAKHSHĀN 151
XXIII.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'L-QĀDIR 152
XXIV.SHAIKH ABŪ-'L-MA‘ĀLĪ 153
XXV.MAULĀNĀ JALĀL OF TALA 157
XXVI.MAULĀNĀ ‘ABDU-'SH-SHAKŪR OF LĀHŌR 157
XXVII.SHAIKH KABĪR, SON OF SHAIKH MUNAWWAR 158
XXVIII.SHAIKH SA‘DU-'LLĀH, THE GRAMMARIAN 160
XXIX.SHAIKH NAṢĪRU-'D-DĪN 161
XXX.SHAIKH MUBĀRAK OF ALWAR 162
XXXI.SHAIKH CĀYAN LADH OF SOHNA 163
XXXII.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'L-GHANĪ OF BADĀON 164
XXXIII.SHAIKH BUHLŪL OF DIHLĪ 167
XXXIV.SHAIKH ‘ABDU-'L-ḤAQQ OF DIHLĪ 167
XXXV.MAULĀNĀ ILĀHDĀD 172
XXXVI.MAULĀNĀ ‘UṮMĀN OF SĀMĀNA 173
XXXVII.ḤĀJĪ SULṬĀN OF THĀNĒSAR 173
XXXVIII.SAYYID SHĀH MĪR OF SĀMĀNA 174
XXXIX.SAYYID YĀSĪN 176
XL.SHAIKH ẒIYĀ'U-'LLĀH 177
XLI.MĪR ABŪ'L-GHĀIṮ OF BUKHĀRĀ 183
XLII.MIYĀN KAMĀLU-D-DĪN ḤUSAIN OF SHĪRĀZ 184
XLIII.SHAIKH ABŪ-'L-FATḤ OF THĀNĒSAR 187
XLIV.MAULĀNĀ 'UṮMĀN OF BANGĀL 188
XLV.SHAIKH ḤUSAIN OF BAZHAR 188
XLVI.MAULĀNĀ ISMĀ‘ĪL THE ‘ARAB 188
XLVII.QĀZĪ MUBĀRAK OF GOPĀMAU 188
XLVIII.MAŪLĀNĀ VAIS OF GWĀLIYĀR 189
XLIX.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD OF SYRIA 191
L.SHAIKH ḤASAN ‘ALĪ OF MAUṢIL 192
LI.QĀẒĪ NŪRU-'LLĀH OF SHUSHTAR 193
LII.ḤĀJĪ IBRĀHĪM THE TRADITIONIST 196
LIII.SHAIKH JALĀL-I-WĀṢIL, OF KĀLPĪ 196
LIV.MALIK MAḤMŪD-I-PIYĀRŪ 197
LV.ṢADR-I-JAHĀN 198
LVI.SHAIKH YA‘QŪB OF KASHMĪR 200
LVII.MAULĀNĀ MĪRZĀ OF SAMARQAND 209
LVIII.QĀẒĪ ABŪ-'L-MA‘ĀLĪ 210
LIX.MAULĀNĀ MĪR-I-KALĀN 211
LX.MAULĀNĀ SA‘ĪD OF TURKISTĀN 212
LXI.ḤĀFIẒ-I-KŪMAKĪ 213
LXII.QĀẒĪ NIẒĀM OF BADAKHSHĀN 214
LXIII.MAULĀNĀ ILĀHDĀD-I-LANGARKHĀNĪ 215
LXIV.MAULĀNĀ MUḤAMMAD, THE Muftī 215
LXV.MĪR FATḤU-'LLĀH OF SHĪRĀZ 216
LXVI.SHAIKH MANṢŪR OF LĀHŌR 217
LXVII.MULLĀ PĪR MUḤAMMAD OF SHĪRVĀN. 217
LXVIII.MĪRZĀ MUFLIS THE ŪZBAK 218
LXIX.MAULĀNĀ NŪRU-D-DĪN MUḤAMMAD TARKHĀN 218
LXX.MAULĀNĀ ILĀHDĀD OF AMRŌHA 219
CHAPTER III. AN ACCOUNT OF THE PHYSICIANS OF THE REIGN OF THE
EMPEROR AKBAR
224
I.ḤAKÍMU-L-MULK OF GÍLĀN 224
II.ḤAKĪM SAIFU-L-MULŪK OF DAMĀWAND 226
III.ḤAKĪM ZANBĪL 228
IV.ḤAKĪM ‘AINU-L-MULK OF SHĪRĀZ 229
V.ḤAKĪM MASĪḤU-L-MULK, OF SHĪRĀZ 230
VI.ḤAKĪM-I-MIṢRĪ 230
VII.ḤAKĪM ‘ALĪ 232
VIII.ḤAKĪN ARŪ-L-FATḤ OF GĪLĀN 233
IX.ḤAKĪM ḤASAN OF GĪLĀN 234
X.ḤAKĪM HUMĀM 234
XI.ḤAKĪM AḤMAD, OF TATTA 235
XII.ḤAKĪM LUṬFU-'LLĀH, OF GĪLĀN 237
XIII.ḤAKĪM MUẒAFFAR, OF ARDASTĀN 237
XIV.ḤAKĪM FATḤU-'LLĀH, OF GĪLĀN 237
XV.SHAIKH BĪNĀ 237
CHAPTER IV. AN ACCOUNT OF THE POETS OF THE REIGN OF THE EMPEROR AKBAR 239
I.GHAZĀLĪ OF MASHHAD 239
II.QĀSIM-I-KĀHĪ 242
III.KH'ĀJA ḤUSAIN OF MARV 248
IV.QĀSIM-I-ARSALĀN 251
V.ĀTASHI OF QANDAHĀR 253
VI.ASHRAF KHĀN, MĪR MUNSHĪ 254
VII.AMĪR QĀZI, ASĪRĪ 255
VIII.MĪR IMĀMĪ, KNOWN AS MUGHBACA 257
IX.MĪR SHARĪF-I-AMĀNĪ, OF IṢFAHĀN 258
X.QĀẒĪ AḤMAD-I-GHAFFĀRĪ OF QAZVĪN 259
XI.MĪR ASHKĪ OF QUM 260
XII.YOL QULI ANĪSĪ 262
XIII.MULLA GHANI, AMANI 262
XIV.ABTARI OF BADAKHSH 263
XV.ULFATĪ, QILĪJ KHĀN 263
XVI.ULFATI OF YAZD 264
XVII.ULFATI OF ‘IRĀQ 265
XVIII.BAIRAM KHĀN, THE KHĀN-I-KHĀNĀN 265
XIX.BĪKASĪ OF GHAZNĪN 268
XX.BĀQĪ OF KOLĀB 270
XXI.BAYĀẒĪ 270
XXII.PAIRAVĪ 271
XXIII.BAQĀ'Ī 273
XXIV.MULLĀ NŪRU-D-DĪN MUḤAMMAD-I-TĀRKHĀN 273
XXV.TARDI, Rūda 278
XXVI.TAUSANĪ 278
XXVII.TAẔARVĪ OF ABHAR 279
XXVIII.TASHBIHI 283
XXIX.TAQĪ-UD-DĪNĪ 285
XXX.ṮĀNĪ KHĀN 286
XXXI.ṮANĀ'Ī 287
XXXII.JUDĀ'Ī 291
XXXIII.JAẔBĪ 293
XXXIV.JAMĪLĪ OF KĀLPĪ 296
XXXV.CISHTĪ 297
XXXVI.JA‘FAR 298
XXXVII.JA‘FAR BEG 299
XXXVIII.ḤAIDARĪ OF TABRĪZ 302
XXXIX.ḤUZNĪ 304
XL.ḤAYĀTĪ OF GĪLĀN 304
XLI.ḤAYĀ'Ī 306
XLII.ḤĀLATĪ 307
XLIII.THE KHĀN-I-A‘ẒAM 308
XLIV.KHANJAR BEG 310
XLV.KHUSRAVĪ 315
XLVI.MĪR DAURĪ 316
XLVII.DAKHLĪ 318
XLVIII.DĀNIHĪ 319
XLIX.DAVĀ'Ī 320
L.RAFΑΠ322
LI.RAHĀ'Ī 324
LII.RAUGHANĪ 325
LIII.ZAIN KHĀN KŪKA 327
LIV.SULṬĀN OF SAPLAK 327
LV.SULṬĀN 331
LVI.SAIRĪ 334
LVII.SIPIHRĪ 334
LVIII.SAYYĀFĪ 335
LIX.SAHMI. 336
LX.SAQQĀ 338
LXI.SIPĀHĪ 340
LXII.SARMADĪ OF IṢFAHĀN 340
LXIII.SĀQĪ OF THE JAZĀ'IR 341
LXIV.SAYYIDĪ 342
LXV.SHĀH ABŪ-'L-MA‘ĀLĪ 344
LXVI.SHĪRĪ 345
LXVII.SHAKĪBĪ OF IṢFAHĀN 351
LXVIII.SHUJ‘Π352
LXIX.SHU‘ŪRĪ OF TURBAT 353
LXX.MULLĀ SĀDIQ ḤALWĀĪ' 354
LXXI.ṢABŪḤĪ 356
LXXII.ṢĀLIḤĪ 358
LXXIII.ṢĀDIQĪ 359
LXXIV.ṢARFĪ 360
LXXV.ṢARFĪ OF SĀWA 361
LXXVI.ṢABŪRĪ OF HAMADĀN 361
LXXVII.ṢĀLIH THE MADMAN 362
LXXVIII.ṬĀRAMĪ 363
LXXIX.ṬARĪQĪ OF SĀWA 365
LXXX.ṬĀLIB OF IṢFAHĀN 367
LXXXI.ṬĀLI‘Ī OF YAZD 368
LXXXII.ṬIFLĪ 370
LXXXIII.ẒUHŪRĪ 372
LXXXIV.‘ĀLIM OF KĀBUL 373
LXXXV.MIR ‘ABDUL ḤAYY OF MASHHAD 378
LXXXVI.‘ITĀBĪ 380
LXXXVII.‘UBAIDĪ. 383
LXXXVIII.‘ISHQĪ KHĀN 384
LXXXIX.‘ILMĪ 385
XC.MIR ‘AZIZU-'LLĀH 386
XCI.MĪRZĀ ‘AZĪZ KŪKA 388
XCII.‘AHDI OF SHIRAZ 390
XCIII.‘INĀYATU-'LLĀH THE SCRIBE 391
XCIV.‘URFĪ OF SHĪRAZ 392
XCV.GHAZNAVĪ 396
XCVI.GHUBARĪ 398
XCVII.GHURBATĪ OF ḤIṢĀR 401
XCVIII.GHAIRATĪ OF SHĪRĀZ 403
XCIX.FĀRIGHĪ OF SHĪRĀZ 403
C.FAHMĪ OF ṬIHRĀN 405
CI.FAHMĪ OF SAMARQAND 405
CII.FIKRĪ 406
CIII.FANĀ'Ī 407
CIV.FUSĪNĪ OF YAZD 408
CV.FĪRŪZA OF KĀBUL 409
CVI.FAHMĪ OF ASTARĀBĀD 411
CVII.SHAIKH FAIẒĪ, THE POET LAUREATE 411
CVIII.FĀRISĪ 429
CIX.QARĀRĪ OF GILĀN 432
CX.QAUSĪ 435
CXI.QAIDĪ OF SHĪRĀR 436
CXII.QADRĪ 437
CXIII.QANDĪ 437
CXIV.KĀMĪ 437
CXV.KULĀHĪ 438
CXVI.KALĀMĪ 439
CXVII.KĀMĪ OF QUM 439
CXVIII.LIQĀ'Ī OF ASTARĀBĀD 440
CXIX.LIWĀ'Ī 440
CXX.LA‘LĪ 441
CXXI.LUṬFĪ THE ASTROLOGER 442
CXXII.MĪR MURTAẒā 442
CXXIII.MAḤWĪ 444
CXXIV.MIR MUḤSIN RIẒAVĪ OF MASHHAD 447
CXXV.MAUJĪ 448
CXXVI.MĪRZĀDA ‘ALĪ KHĀN 450
CXXVII.MU‘IZZĪ OF HIRĀT 451
CXXVIII.MURĀDĪ OF ASTARĀBĀD 451
CXXIX.MUSHFIQĪ OF BUKHĀRĀ 452
CXXX.MAĪLĪ OF HIRĀT 452
CXXXI.MALIK OF QUM 458
CXXXII.MUDĀMĪ OF BADAKHSHĀN 461
CXXXIII.MULLĀ MAQṢŪD OF QAZVĪN 462
CXXXIV.MIḤNATĪ OF ḤIṢĀR 465
CXXXV.MŪSAWĪ OF MASHHAD 465
CXXXVI.KHẈĀJA MU‘AẒẒAM 466
CXXXVII.MAUZŪN 467
CXXXVIII.MUḤAMMAD YUSUF 468
CXXXIX.MANẒARĪ OF SAMARQAND 469
CXL.MUDĀMĪ OF HAMADĀN 471
CXLI.MUQĪMĪ OF SABZAVĀR 471
CXLII.—— 472
CXLIII.MAḤWĪ 473
CXLIV.MAẒHARĪ OF KASHMĪR 474
CXLV.SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD OF DIHLĪ 474
CXLVI.NUVĪDĪ OF TURBAT 475
CXLVII.NISHĀNĪ 480
CXLVIII.NAṢIḤĪ 493
CXLIX.NIHĀNĪ 494
CL.NAJĀTĪ OF GĪLĀN 495
CLI.MULLĀ NUVĪDĪ 495
CLII.NAU‘I 495
CLIII.NIYĀZĪ 496
CLIV.NĀMĪ 498
CLV.NAẒĪRĪ OF NĪSHĀPŪR 508
CLVI.NAVĀ'Ī 510
CLVII.NUVĪDĪ OF NĪSHĀPŪR 510
CLVIII.NAẒMĪ OF TABRĪZ 511
CLIX.VUQŪ‘Ī OF NĪSHĀPŪR 512
CLX.VID‘ΠOF HIRĀT 516
CLXI.VĀQΑΠOF HIRĀT 517
CLXII.VAṢFĪ 518
CLXIII.VAṢLĪ 519
CLXIV.VUQŪFĪ OF HIRĀT 519
CLXV.VAF‘ΠOF IṢFAHĀN 520
CLXVI.HAMDAMĪ 520
CLXVII.HAJRĪ 522
CLXVIII.HĀSHIM 524
NOTICE 538
INDEX 539
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.

This volume completes the translation of the Muntakhabu-'t-tawārī kh of ‘Abdu-'l-Qādir b. Mulūk Shāh, al-Badāonī, in the Bibliotheca Indica series. Its sources are those enumerated by Lieutenant-Colonel G. S. A. Ranking in the preface to his translation of volume I.

It was begun as long ago as 1897, but owing to the constant pressure of official duties was not finished until 1909, and even then could not be immediately printed owing to difficulties in the way of allotting funds for the expenses of publication. The index and list of errata have only lately been finished.

Frequent interruptions in the work are responsible for some inconsistencies in transliteration—such, for instance, as Shamsu-'d-din and Shams-ud-din, Khāja, Kh'āja, and Khẉāja. My excuse for the frequent omission of any equivalent for the letter in transliterating the latter word is that the translation was made, for the most part, in India, where the frequent pronunciation of this mute letter was so offensive that at the time I judged it better to preserve the correct pronunciation by omitting it. I confess that this is not a very good excuse for the omission of a letter, but it is the best that I can offer.

I have nothing to add to Lieutenant-Colonel Ranking's remarks on the difficulty of translating from Persian, except that they apply with peculiar force to an author like Badāonī, writing in a language not his own. His style is stilted and inelegant, as must nearly always be the case with an author labouring under this disadvantage, and he persists in one error —the misuse of the word , which means “ungrudging emulation,” but is always used by him in the sense of “envy” —but it is free from the bombastic prolixity and gross affectation of that of his compatriot and contemporary, Shaikh Abū-'l-Faẓl.

As this volume of the historian's work consists to a great extent of literary criticism, I have been careful to translate both his text and the excerpts of verse quoted by him as literally as possible, in order to convey some idea, however faint, of his standard of literary excellence. In only one or two passages, to which reference is made in notes, have I ventured to modify expressions which in an English dress would have been merely ridiculous; but I am conscious that many of the passages which I have rendered more exactly will appear grotesque. This was unavoidable, and is due partly to the wide divergence between the standards of taste of Persian writers of the sixteenth and English readers of the twentieth centuries, and partly to Badāonī's own defects.

A few passages are so indecent that I have been constrained to veil them in such disguise as a dead language affords. To this practice it may be objected that it calls attention to what is unseemly, but a book of this nature will seldom be taken up but by genuine seekers after knowledge, who are not likely to suffer harm from the obscenities of Badāonī, or of those whom he quotes.

Interruptions in the work of translation are also responsible for a rather long list of errata, for which, and for other imperfections I crave the indulgence of my readers.

W. H.

TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN.

April 7, 1924.

“IN THE NAME OF GOD, THE MERCIFUL, THE COMPASSIONATE!”
CHAPTER I.

I will state at the outset1 that as the author of the Tārīkh-i-Niẓāmī 1a has given an account of the nobles of the realm immediately after his history of the empire, and as most of them are now dead, and gone to perdition,1b

[In no one have I seen fidelity,
If thou hast found one who possesses it convey to him my
blessing.]

I will refrain from polluting the nib of my pen with a description of such worthless wretches, and will commence with the enumeration of some of the holy men of the age, for an account of noble men who have chosen the way of God is in every way to be preferred to an account of scoundrels and debauchees. And so will I not be a mark for threats and comminations.1c (“Throw dust on the faces of those who praise without stint,” and again, “may God protect us from the wickedness of tyrants.”)1d An account of the base acts of the followers (of the Divine Faith),1e

with whose unclean existence the age is polluted may be thus described:—

Their letters do not spell sense,2
Nor do their thoughts tend in the direction of sense;
Think meanly of the base, and of those whose faith is weak,
Form the same estimate of the latter as of the former.
When one can call to mind one's friends,
And so make the heart a garden of sweet memories,
Pity were it to mention one's enemies
For that were to quit the sweet garden for the midden.2a

The holy men by whose noble existence the reign of Akbar 2. Shāh was adorned have now, for the most part, withdrawn, as the ‘anqā2b retires to the mountains of Qāf, to the neighbourhood of the Great God. It is as though they had all conspired together to roll up and remove the baggage of life from this dwelling of care and deceit and to take up their abode in the home of joy and bliss. And now of that caravan not one remains to encourage stragglers.

“The mansions are deserted, temporary and permanent
dwelling alike,
“Nothing remains but owls and rubbish.”2c

I shall begin with that class of men who were regularly employed in the Imperial service until2d their fame reached such a pitch that it was as manifest as the sun at midday.

I. MIYĀṄ ḤĀTIM OF SAMBHAL.3
(May God sanctify his tomb.)

Miyāṅ Ḥātim3a was a profound sage who passed very many years in teaching. He was endowed with both inward and outward perfection. While he was engaged in acquiring knowledge he was overcome by religious ecstasy,3b and, forsaking scholastic disputations, attached himself as a disciple to his teacher, Shaikh Azīzu-'llāh, a learned man of Ṭalamba,3c who was of those who are truly wise in the way of God, and was one of the most highly regarded of the holy men of his time. He also spent some time in the service of Shaikh ‘Alāu-'d-Dīn Cishtī3d of Dihlī, (may God sanctify his soul!) following his rule, and obtained from both of these holy men permission to perfect their students and disciples. At the time when he was first drawn towards God he wandered about for ten years, bareheaded and barefooted, in the waste country round about Sambhal and Amroha,3e and during all this time his head touched not bed or bolster. He was a man who took keen pleasure in contemplating God and whom the singing of God's praises threw into an ecstasy of delight, and ever, as he spoke and smiled, the name of God was on his tongue. In his last years the intoxication of joy which he experienced in his love for God so overpowered him that to, listen but for a short space to the chanting of God's praises placed him beside himself. He had not the strength to listen to hymns.

When I, in the year 960 A.H. (A.D. 1553), being then in my twelfth year, arrived in company with my father at Sambhal, 3. and there entered the service of the Shaikh, I learnt by heart, in his hospice, the Qaṣīda-yi-burda,4 and thus gained admission (to the ranks of his disciples), and there I also read, to my great spiritual advantage and profit, part of the book Kanz-i-fiqh-i-Ḥanafī .4a The Shaikh then enrolling me among his direct disciples said to my father, “I have bestowed upon your son the cap and the tree4b which descend from my spiritual teacher Miyāṅ Shaikh ‘Azīzu-'llāh for this reason, that he may acquire also some exoteric knowledge” (i.e., beyond the esoteric knowledge which he was to acquire). And for this praise be to God. In the year 969 A.H. (A.D. 1561-2) the holy Shaikh went into God's Presence, and the words “the wise darvīsh4c give the date of his death. May God make his dust fragrant! And it so happened that my father too received the summons of God's mercy in the same year. One might say that the position in which he stood to the Shaikh as his disciple made it necessary that he should so follow him.

II. SHAIKH JALĀLU'-D-DĪN OF THĀNESAR.

He was the Khalīfah5 or deputy of Shaikh ‘Abdu-'l-Quddūs of Gangoh5a (may God sanctify their tombs!) His attainments, both in exoteric and in esoteric learning, were great, and he employed himself in imparting instruction in divinity and in the spreading abroad of those branches of knowledge which are, as the subject of divine revelation, certainly proved. In his last years he abandoned the pursuit of secular knowledge and, choosing privacy rather than publicity, spent his valuable time in reading through the blessed Qur'ān, in performing works of supererogation, and in praise and prayer. When he was ninety-three years of age he was exceedingly weak and feeble, so that there seemed to be nothing remaining of him but skin and bone.

Couplet.

When the veins of an aged man, in consequence of his
abandonment of worldly desires, stand out on his skin.
Then it is that he becomes, as it were, a ruler to guide
disciples in the way of righteousness.5b

And although he had not so much strength left as enabled him to sit down and rise up5c and to move about, and used, in 4. consequence of his feebleness and weakness, to lie all day long in a reclining position, yet no sooner did he hear the call to prayer than he would, without the assistance of anybody, rise up, put on his shoes, take his staff in his hand, perform his ceremonial ablutions by himself and without any help, and stand up for his prayers.6 This done he would again recline in his wonted position on his couch. I twice had the honour of attending on him, once in the year H. 969 (A.D. 1561-2), in Āgra, when he had come there to settle the matter of his aima6a holding in Thānesar6b and to have the subject represented, and again in the year A.H. 981 (A.D. 1573-4) when I was accompanying Ḥusain Khān in his pursuit of Ulugh Mīrzā.6c He seemed to me to be a quantity of (divine) light in bodily form. He bade farewell to this transitory world in the year A.H. 989 (A.D. 1581), May God remember him to his good!

III. SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD GHAUṮ OF GWĀLIYĀR.6d

He was the disciple of Shaikh Ẓuhūr and Ḥājī Ḥuzūr, otherwise known as Ḥājī Ḥamīd, and his spiritual descent could be traced back, through the line of the Shaṭṭārī order of ascetics to Shaikh Bāyazīd of Busṭām,7 the prince of knowers of God. (May God sanctify his soul!) When entering on the religious life he spent twelve years on the lower slopes of the hills of Canār7a and the adjoining country, practising the most severe austerities, having his dwelling in caves and subsisting on the leaves of trees. He was an acknowledged master in the science of exorcism,7b he possessed supernatural power, and was drawn in a mysterious manner towards God.7c He obtained leave to practise this science (scil. exorcism) from his elder brother, Shaikh Buhlūl,7d who was a worker of miracles and wonders. His late Majesty, the Emperor Humāyūn, on whom God's mercy has descended, had the greatest faith in and attachment to these two saints, so much so that there were very few that ranked with them in his estimation. From these venerable men he learnt the science of exorcism. After the rebellion in India, when Shīr 5. Shāh began to oppress Shaikh Muḥammad, he betook himself to Gujarāt where also he brought princes and rulers under the yoke of subjection to him and8 belief in his teaching, so that all alike were ready to do him service. Shaikh Wajīhu-'d-Dīn too, a knower and a8a doer of the things that belong to God, a profound thinker and a teacher, drew upon his shoulders the saddle-cloth of obedience to Shaikh Muḥammad. All these things are an indication of the Shaikh's perfections and of his power of working miracles. Many other great and famous holy men in Dihlī, Gujarāt, and Bangāl have risen from the fringe of his robe,8b and memorials of his perfection still remain in Hindūstān. One day in the year H. 966 (A.D. 1558-9) I saw him from afar off, riding along in the market place at Āgra, a throng of the common people surrounding and preceding him, so that no one could pass through the crowd. In his courteous humility his head was never for one moment still, as he returned the salutations of the people on either side of him, bowing continually down to his saddle-bow. It was in this year that he came from Gujarāt to Āgra, and with much exhortation and persuasion, availing himself of the influence of those about the Court, enrolled the Emperor Akbar, then a youth, among his disciples, but the Emperor soon rejected his teaching, and since Shaikh Muḥam-mad's companionship was distasteful to the Khān-i-Khānān, Bairam Khān,8c and to Shaikh Gadāī,8d he withdrew, ill pleased, to Gwāliyār, where he spent his time in perfecting his disciples, and, having built an hospice, occupied himself with the ecstatic dances of darvīshes,9 chanting, and giving way to transports of religious ecstasy.9a He himself also wrote books on these subjects. Clad in the garments of poverty he held a high and majestic position, and possessed a subsistence allowance of a karor of tankas.9b Whomsoever he saw, were he a beggar even, he treated with great honour, standing before him. For this reason some few from among those who were vowed to poverty blamed him, and denied (that he was a true ascetic).9c But God alone knows what his motives were in this matter.

Couplet.

Since God in His omniscience alone knows whether a soul is
to be rejected or accepted,
“Judge not lest thou be judged.” 6.9d

In the year H. 970 (A.D. 1562-3), after completing his eightieth year, he died in Āgra, leaving this world for the next, and was buried in Gwāliyār. He was generous to a degree, and it is said that the word “I” never passed his lips, and that he always referred to himself as “this humble one.” So particular was he in this matter that even when giving away corn in charity he would say “Mīm and Nūn,10 give this much corn to such an one,” in order to avoid the necessity of saying “I.” May God shower his mercy plenteously upon him!

IV. SHAIKH BURHĀN.

Burhān was an ascetic of great resignation and piety, and a very prince among those who have chosen a life of religious seclusion and retirement, and of independence of worldly concerns. It is said that he was once for three days in company with Miyān Ilāhdād of Bārī,10a of the spiritual line of the famous Mīr Sayyid Muḥammad of Jaunpur,10b (may God sanctify his soul), there being only one intermediary between them, and that it was on that occasion that he acquired this excellence, and attained to perfection. He had subjected himself to severe discipline and possessed great self-control. For nearly fifty years (before his death) he had abstained from flesh-meat and from most other articles of food and drink, contenting himself with a little milk and some sweet-meats; and at the end of his life he abstained also from drinking water, so that to outward appearance he was an incorporeal spiritual form, supernaturally illuminated. He had in Kālpī a very small and dark cell in which he constantly sat, engaged in reciting God's praises and in meditation and contemplation. He used also to retain his breath,11 after the fashion of the Mahdavīs, and although he had never studied any of the sciences treated of in Arabic literature he used to give most eloquent dissertations on the Qur'ān. He was a reader of the secrets of human hearts. When I was returning from Canār (Chunār) in A.H. 967 (A.D. 1559-60) during the rule of ‘Abdu-'llāh Khān the Ūzbak11a I spent a night in attendance on the Shaikh, whose conversation was sublime. He recited, appositely 7. to the occasion, some of his own Hindī poetry of which the subjects were exhortation, admonition, mysticism,11b the longing of the human soul for God,11c the Unity of God, and withdrawal from the world. The next day Mihr ‘Alī Sildūz,11d who, in spite of his friendship towards holy men, was to some extent a slave to his own Turkish nature, and was something of a bully and a tyrant,

[I have been the slave of that man of perfect nature, from
the day on which he said,
“The Turk, though he become a mullā, can never become a
man.”]

was honoured, by means of an introduction from me, with an interview with the Shaikh. Now it so happened that about an hour before this time he had severely beaten and kicked some of his servants and attendants, and had abused them in most unbecoming language before mounting his horse to go for a ride. When we sat down together the first words the Shaikh uttered were, “The prophet (may God bless and save him!) said, ‘The (true) Muslim is he who (courteously) salutes (other) Muslims both with his hand and with his tongue.’” The Shaikh uttered this precious aphorism and sublime truth with special reference to the occasion, and Mihr ‘Ali rose to his feet for the purpose of excusing himself, and, after expressing his contrition and shame he begged the Shaikh to recite the fātiḥah12 on his behalf, offering to him, at the same time, something by way of a present, which was not accepted.

The Shaikh reached the age of nearly one hundred years and departed this life in the year A.H. 970 (A.D. 1562-3). I have made the following chronogram on his death:—

My heart said he was the chief of Saints.12a

In accordance with the terms of his will he was buried in the cell to which he had retired—may God shed light upon his resting-place!

V. SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD-I-KAMBŪ,12b
OF SAMBHAL.

He belonged to the Qādirī12c order. On first entering the religious 8. life he subjected himself to a most rigorous discipline. He was a man who was mysteriously drawn towards God12d and was subject to fits of religious ecstasy. He had a sweet voice and when he was in one of his fits of ecstasy he would chant so sweetly as to touch the hearts of all who heard him; the flavour of that ecstatic song still lingers on the palate of my soul. In his earlier years he acquired exoteric knowledge and was engaged in teaching. He had an ardent love for such forms as display, in their beauty, the power of the Creator, nor was he ever at any time free from the bonds of that love which is transferred from the Creator to the creature,13 and when in these bonds he lost all self-control, and, putting aside all dissimulation and restraint took no account of the praise or blame of others, careless alike of their disapprobation and their approval. For this reason was he known as Shaikh Muḥammad-i-‘Āshiq, or “the lover.” In A.H. 985 (A.D. 1579) he transferred the baggage of his existence to that land where the soul is united to God.13a The words “the sixth of Shavvāl”13b give the date of his death. May God make his soul fragrant!

VI. SHAIKH FAKHRU-'D-DĪN.

He was an old man in whom shone the Divine Light, ascetic in his habits, having complete trust in God, and uncontrollable religious enthusiasm. He lived a retired and solitary life, keeping the door of ingress and egress shut to himself. Every Friday he held in his hospice a meeting of Ṣūfīs,14 and would insist upon the assembly joining in ecstatic songs and dances, and, how much soever one might excuse himself from this, the Shaikh would work himself up into a state of religious ecstasy, and his phrensy would extend, in its full power, to the rest. On the conclusion of this religious exercise food was served. The Shaikh made no distinction between king and beggar. Bairām Khān, the Khān-i-Khānān,14a used generally to recite his Friday prayers in the Shaikh's masjid, and the effects of his companionship with the Shaikh were seen in his increased tenderness of heart. In sitting down and rising, in taking food, and in all other observances of etiquette no difference was made by the Shaikh between him and anybody else.

9. VII. SHAIKH ‘AZĪZU-'LLĀH.

He was a conspicuous example of the degree of divine knowledge which is within the reach of man. He was a very crucible of love for God, in which the pure gold of his being was ever at melting heat, until it reached the extreme limit of refinement and purity. This being his condition he was constantly weeping in his ardent desire for God, to such an extent that the world has never seen his equal. No sooner did the sound of a holy song or chant fall upon his ear than one would say that a violent wind had arisen, and was blowing through a fiery tempest. Praise be to God! What love and affection for God were seen in the noble nature of that great man! In the phrensied dance (of darvīshes) and when he was vying with other mystics in working himself up into a state of ecstasy,15 occupations which formed the morning and evening exercises of his blessed condition, a flint, could it have looked upon his face, would have become softer than wax.

Shaikh ‘Azīzu-'llāh had been the disciple of his own respected father, Shaikh Ḥasan, and acquired some of his excellence from his own elder brother, Shaikh Muḥammad Ḥasan, the spiritual guide and master of Shaikh Mān of Pānīpat. His life was governed by the rules of poverty, indigence, and humility. To champion the cause of the poor and helpless who came to him with their complaints he would travel long distances on foot, even though he had at the time entered into a forty days' retreat,15a and though he had to visit the house of one who was without the pale of the faith in order to gain his object. After successfully fulfilling the wants of the applicant he would return to the cell of retirement and engage in his religious exercises as though no break had occurred in his retreat. He used to give to this worship, which benefited others, precedence and place before that worship the rewards of which are confined to the worshipper.15b And it would sometimes happen that an unbeliever or an oppressor would pay no heed to his intercession on the first occasion, or, (knowing that the Shaikh was without), would purposely remain within doors, and the Shaikh would sit the livelong day expectant at his door, without being able to see his face. But on successive days15c the Shaikh would go again and again16 to his door and would sit in silence, nor would this slighting treatment produce on the clear mirror of his heart, 10. which reflected the hidden knowledge of God, the rust of resentment. He would thus sit until the person to whom the intercession was to be made fell, shamed and remorseful, at his feet, and promptly and obediently fulfilled the desire of the beggar.

One day the Shaikh was present at a meeting of the mystics engaged in ecstatic songs and dances, as their custom is,16a held by that prince of holy men Shaikh Niẓām-i-Auliyā, (may God sanctify his most pure tomb!), when a wretched maniac, uttering a yell, seized the Shaikh by the knees, and, lifting him up, turned him heels over head on the floor, so that his turban was disarranged, and he was hurt, but in outward appearance16b he was in no way disturbed. At the time this act of the maniac was attributed to religious ecstasy and he was held to be excused, but the demented fool repeated his abominable trick on a subsequent occasion, when the magistrate of the city proposed to recall his scattered senses by means of a severe caution, a beating, and threats of what would happen to him in the future. The Shaikh made much intercession for him, and, kissing his hands and feet, kept him under his own protection, and did not suffer them to molest him in any way. In exoteric knowledge he was perfect himself,16c and used to perfect others, and he used to instruct his pupils in the expounding of the ‘Arā'is,17 and of the ‘Awārif17a and of the Fuṣūṣu-'l-Ḥikam17b and its commentary. He was also the author of some well-known works, among them being the Risāla-yi-‘Ainiyyah written as a reply to the Ghairiyyah17c of Shaikh Mān of Pānīpat. Many obscure questions relating to the unity of essence17d are therein treated of,17e in accordance with the interpretation of perfect knowers of God.17f

At the time of the Khān-i-Khānān's disgrace,18 and also for some years afterwards, I studied under that master of perfection, and listened to the recital of several books and treatises on mysticism,18a and digested their contents—praise be to God. In the year H. 975 (A.D. 1567-68) the falcon of his soul winged its flight to the pinnacle of eternity, and the words “the pole-star of the path is gone,”18b were found to give the date of his death. He always wrote himself in his treatises, writings, and letters “the worthless atom,” and it was found that the words “the worthless atom”18c also gave the date of his death.

11. VIII. SHAIKH SALĪM-I-CISHTĪ.18d

He was one of the descendants of the venerable Shaikh Farīd-i-Shakarganj18e

(may God sanctify his soul), and his native place was Dihlī. He stood in the relation of a disciple to Khājah Ibrāhīm (who was spiritually descended through five intermediaries from the most bountiful Khāja, the ascetic Fuẓail Ibn ‘Iyāẓ—19 may the mercy of God be upon him!) through whose instrumentality also he was first turned towards God. He twice travelled by land and sea from India to the two most holy places of pilgrimage, 19a there to perform the duties of the pilgrimage.19b He set forth on his travels, journeying to Asia Minor, Baghdād, Syria, Najaf,20 (that holy spot), and other countries of the western regions, spending the whole year in travelling, returning to the glorious city of Makkah at the time of the pilgrimage, and then again setting out on his travels. In this manner he performed the pilgrimage twenty-two times, fourteen times during his first period of absence from India, and eight times during his second period of absence. On this latter occasion he spent four years in the glorious city of Makkah and four years in the delightful city of Madīnah, and during his sojourn in Makkah he used to spend the period during which Muḥammad's birthday occurred in Madīnah, and the period of the pilgrimage at Makkah. Shaikh Ya‘qūb of Kashmīr who accompanied Shaikh Salīm gave the date of his latter visit to Makkah in the following couplets:—

Thanks be to God, of whose mere bounty
The holy region became our halting-place.
If any one ask the date of this event
We answer him, “We entered the holy region.”20a

And in that country he was known as Shaikhu-'l-Hind, or the holy man of India. He reached the age of ninety-five and travelled always in the path of the holy law delivered by the prophet (may God bless and save him!), always observing the most severe austerities and the most austere discipline, to a degree which can have been attained by but few of the holy men of this age. He observed, as a religious duty, the ceremonial purification and bathing before each of the five daily recitals of prayers, nor did he omit this duty before the weekly public prayers.

12. When Shaikh Mān of Pānīpat, (may God sanctify his tomb!), enjoyed companionship with Shaikh Salīm he put to him this question:—“Was it induction or revelation that was the means of your attaining to your goal?” Shaikh Salīm replied, “Our means is ‘heart to heart.’”20b Very many holy men who have reached perfection received their training in his service and companionship, and became his deputies and successors. Among them was the Shaikh21 who after being perfected received authority to impart religious instruction to other disciples, and whose history is wellknown. Another was Shaikh Kamāl of Alwar, an old man inflamed and enwrapped with zeal, resembling in disposition the leaders among holy men. Another was Shaikh Piyāra of Bangāl, a man distracted with the grief of longing after God. His fame is great in the country of Bangāl.21a Another was Shaikh Fatḥu-'llāh Tarīn of Sambhal. Another was Shaikh Ruknu-'d-dīn of Ajūdhan,21b and another was Ḥusain the Khādim, who was the best of Shaikh Salīm's deputies, and the midmost pearl in the string (of his disciples). He was the chief decider of abstruse questions in the hospice at Fatḥpūr. When Shaikh Salīm returned a second time to India the writer of these lines heard that he had attained to an extensive knowledge of, and pre-eminent proficiency in the Arabic language. I therefore sent him a letter containing two chronograms21c of his two auspicious arrivals, which have been mentioned above. A verbatim copy of the letter is set forth below.

Copy of the Arabic Letter written by the Author to Shaikh
Salīm-i-Cishtī
.

Verily the religion which is approved by God is Islām.

Verse.

Salutations to those who walk round the Ka‘bah,
By the circumambulation of which the pilgrimage of noble
men is consummated,
Salutations to those who dwell in a place,
In which he who surpassed all men lodgeth.22

I present the duties of prayers, the breezes of the sweet odours 13. of which perfume the cells of the gathering places of holiness, and I send pages of greetings, the sweet odours of the waftings of which scent the meetings of the caravans of kindly fellowship. (These I send) to that high presence and to that exalted throne, the place of prostration for the foreheads of the great kings of the age—the spot to be kissed by the lips of the emperors of the cycle—the titles of which the imagination cannot comprehend by its intelligence, before the door of which titles are cast down— the high presence of the sun, which stands in need of neither praise nor description—that is, to the presence of the pattern for men, of him who is followed at this time, the Shaikhu-'l-Islām, may his shadow be ever extended over the heads of all creatures in general, and over the foreheads of the bands of feeble seekers after knowledge in particular. And since they (scil. my prayers and greetings) spring from sincerity of intention and proceed from singleness of heart, I hope that they will meet with the honour of acceptance, and the attainment of everything that is hoped for and prayed for is from God. After the performance of what is incumbent on the neck of one of your slaves23 and on the conscience of my soul may it become clear to your enlightened mind, the mirror of what is hidden, aye, to your great heart, the mirror of certainty, that not the half of a line of the hardship of separation from you and of the violence of the pain of longing after you can be contained in vessels of letters,23a should all the trees in the earth become pens, and should the sea (become ink) with seven more seas23b to swell its tide, in the passage of time and its changes. And the heart is the most faithful witness, as is well affirmed.

Verse.

“God knows that my soul has perished
“With desire of thee, but thou revivest it;23c
“And a sight of thee, Oh, object of my desire, and my hope!
“Is more pleasant to me than the world and all that it
contains.”

And your slave, distracted with love, has striven with an utter striving and has endeavoured with a supreme effort to obtain the felicity24 of enjoying your noble company, and of hearing some of your polished discourse, but Fate assists not my designs, and ascent to the heaven of eminence is no easy matter.

Verse.

It is not everything that man desires that he obtains,
The wind blows in the direction which the ships do not
desire.

14. In spite of this my reliance on the noble beneficence24a of God is firm, and my hope in His gracious and boundless favours is sincere, (my hope being) that my eye may be suffused with light by the sight of your beauty, even as my heart is filled with the contemplation of the idea of you. Verily, God answereth our prayers and doth not disappoint us.

Verse.

I place my hope in God for the attainment of gifts,
And my Lord is the giver of what his slave desires.

And it is not far from your wonderful beneficence that you should give me to read an odour-diffusing epistle and send for me with a kind invitation. It is not fitting that the footsteps of my pen should wander more than this over the carpet of familiarity, and that the dove of composition should (any longer) sing on the branch of the tree of glee, and it is best to stop short at this period, and most meet and fitting to curtail (my letter) at the point of prayer (for you). May your exalted nature not cease to be protected from the casualties of ill-hap, and secured from the lightning-like mishaps of night and day.

Verse.

May you last as long as time, O refuge of the people of the
time!
This is the prayer of all creatures.

May God answer the prayer of his servant, by the right of him after whom there comes no one.”25

This letter was dated in the course of the years mentioned above. When I paid my respects to the Shaikh in the year H. 976 (A.D. 1568-69) having been introduced by Shaikh A‘ẓam of Badāon, who was both son-in-law and cousin to Shaikh Salīm, he asked me “How has the position of the tomb of the prophet25a (may God bless and save him) been determined in the books of ‘the sayings’ with regard to the tombs of the two Shaikhs?25b

(may God regard them both with favour!)” I said “In such a way, and others have said ‘in such another way.’” He said, “Sahrawardī, in the ‘Wāqi‘a-yi-Ṣā‘iqa,’26 where he verifies the forms of the three tombs, gives preference to the former statement of the case.” In accordance with the Shaikh's exalted command I remained for two days with Shaikh A‘ẓam, who has been 15. already mentioned, in a cell in the old hospice, and enjoyed detailed conversations with the Shaikh. Then I obtained leave to depart for Basāwar.26a Subsequently, in the year H. 978 (A.D. 1570-71) I repeatedly had the honour of paying my respects to the Shaikh, and one of his extraordinary acts26b which I observed was that in the cold wintry air of the highlands of Fatḥpūr he never wore anything on the upper part of his body but a shirt of a single thickness of fine cotton cloth,26c woven thin, and an upper garment of muslin,26d and this in spite of the duty that he imposed upon himself of bathing twice daily. His daily food in the quadragesimal fasts of union with God27 was half a water-melon, or even less than that. He passed away to the next world in the year H. 979 (A.D. 1571-72) and the words “the Indian Shaikh27a were found to give the date of his death.

IX. SHAIKH NIẒĀMU-'D-DĪN OF AMBEṬHĪ.

Ambeṭhī is the chief village of a pargana in the District of Lakhnau.27b Shaikh Niẓām was the disciple and pupil of Shaikh Ma‘rūf-i-Cishtī, the line of whose spiritual descent goes back to Shaikh Nūr Quṭb-i-‘Ālam. He followed the ordinary rule of life (of an orthodox Muslim) but was at the same time drawn towards God in a mysterious manner.27c Although he was at first one of the students of remunerative branches of knowledge27d his exalted disposition yet led him to turn much towards the things of the next world. His eyes were ever fixed on the page and his heart fixed on God, nor was he neglectful of the service of ẕikr,27e and the employment of the soul (in God's service).

Couplet.

Not for one moment do I turn my attention from that moon,28
I fear lest it should glance towards me and I should not be
on the watch.

In a short time he obtained from his spiritual guide permission to impart religious instruction and to perfect disciples, and in the village of Ambeṭhī drew his foot within the skirt of contentment and withheld his footsteps from the doors of high and low, going nowhere except to the principal masjid of the Living God (in that 16. place) and sometimes to Khairābād28a to walk round the illustrious tomb of the venerable Shaikh Sa‘d, (may his tomb be sanctified!) and to see Shaikhu-'l-Hidyah,28b the successor of Shaikh Ṣūfī, (may God sanctify his most pure tomb!), or to Gopāmau, in consequence of the friendship which he had for Qāẓī Mubārak of Gopāmau28c who was one of his faithful disciples, a master of perfection, skilled in the holy law, and abstinent, and a very wealthy man. The Shaikh in the early days of his student life had first been attracted to God in the hospice of the Qāẓī's father. At long intervals he would take the trouble to go to Fatḥpur, by way of making a tour, to see Shaikh ‘Abdu-'l-Ghanī,28d who also was one of the greatest among famous elders, and was held in the highest respect. Whenever he visited the hospice of Shaikhu-'l-Hidyah and the other places he would give of his worldly goods a rupee, a tanka, or some other offering, in accordance with the saying “Send presents to each other and you will love each other,”28e and then would fall into an ecstasy of delight. I have heard that he once snatched the book “Fuṣūṣu-'l-Ḥikam29 from the hand of Shaikh Abū-'l-Fatḥ, the son of Shaikhu-'l-Hidyah, who is now his great father's representative and sits on his prayer-carpet of Shaikh-dom, and, taking it from him, gave him another book, saying, “Read this.” He made the books “Iḥyā'u-'l-‘Ulūm,”29a‘Awārif,” “Risāla-yi-Makkiyya,”29bĀdābu-'l-Murīdīn,”29c [and other books of the same sort, the pivot on which his doctrine and practice turned, both in his religious duties and in the daily business of life. He always first recited the midday prayers with the congregation on Friday and afterwards recited the regular Friday prayers. In the khuṭbah29d he altogether omitted the praises of kings. I saw him reciting the Friday prayers with his shoes on his feet, and he said “His holiness, the resort of apostleship, (may God bless and save him!) recited his prayers with his shoes on.” On one occasion one of his pupils desired to learn a lesson from the book known as Kāfiyah,29e asking for the Shaikh's blessing on 17. his lesson. The Shaikh pretended not to hear him. After much insistence and persistence on the part of the pupil the Shaikh said “Read some divinity.” He said, “This work too is on divinity, inasmuch as divinity depends upon it.” The Shaikh, in the warmth of his love for God, said, “How can divinity depend upon a book on which the first argument that has been advanced is that the author has omitted the praises of God, (may He be honoured and glorified!) from the introduction on account of his humility?” He rarely accepted a disciple, and (when he had one) he did not appoint his tasks for him or give him instruction.30 Among his chosen disciples was Shaikh Ḥātim of Gopāmau whom he had removed from the class of students who read in the hospice of Qāẓī Mubārak and kept with himself. To please the boy he would sometimes read lessons to him, and would sometimes give him a book, and set tasks for him, until he completely won his heart, and sometimes he would give him a turban, or shoes, or clothes. The Qāẓī and the other students, when they saw these favours (bestowed upon Shaikh Ḥātim) were envious30a of him. The holy Shaikh Niẓāmu-'d-dīn, perceiving signs of this jealousy, said, “What can be done? God the Most High has willed to bestow upon Ḥātim a portion of prosperity by means of these unsatisfactory gifts, a few clothes and old shoes.” Shaikh Niẓām obtained such complete power and utter influence over Ḥātim that in a short time he (Ḥātim) attained a great reputation, and Shaikh Niẓāmu-'d-dīn in expounding Divine truths and the mystic knowledge of God used to restrict the title of Shaikh to him alone. In the meanwhile30b Shaikh Ḥātim experienced many ups and downs, and he was troubled with asthma, and various sicknesses, and just as he had acquired the right to be Shaikh Niẓamu-'d-dīn's deputy and successor he chose the path to the next world. The Shaikh would often say, “There was a servant of God to whom I used sometimes to teach the word of God, and he used to understand it. Now that he is gone to whom shall I speak of it?”

When I, the compiler of these historical selections, paid my respects to the Shaikh, Shaikh ‘Abdū-'z-Razzāq, who was both 18. brother-in-law and father-in-law31 to him, was generally in conversation with him, and sometimes, but rarely, the Shaikh would go to see (or would go out walking with) Shaikh Muḥammad also, his true deputy (or successor),31a who now adorns the prayer-carpet of the Shaikh with his presence, sitting as his successor. Since the late Muḥammad Ḥusain Khān,31b some account of whom has already been recorded by my chronicling pen, and who was a man to whom I was bound by the bond of regard more closely than can be expressed in writing, entertained a desire to become a disciple of the holy Shaikh, he was privileged to pay his respects to him by the co-operation of Sayyid Aṣghar of Badāon and Qāẓī Aḥmad, the brother of Qāẓī Mubārak of Gopāmau;31c and this happened at the time when Lakhnau was settled on Ḥusain Khān in jāgīr, in A.H. 976 (A.D. 1568-69). I observed32 that the Shaikh at the beginning of the interview addressed to everybody a few words appropriate to his condition, contenting himself with saying “Praise be to God” with the utterance of prayers, or restricting himself to such remarks as, “Glory be to God,” “there is no god but God,” “We seek protection of God,”32a “In the name of God,” “there is no power or strength but with God,” or to the recitation of a verse from the glorious word (of God), or from the ḥadīth,32b or from the sayings of noted saints. And every moment he glanced to his left, so that it seemed as though he were seeking from the master of the assembly32c permission and leave to say something. On receiving leave from one of the company,32d at the time when we were shaking hands with one another, he gave the Sayyid, mentioned above,32e his blessing, saying to Qāẓī Aḥmad “Glory be to God,” and to me, “In the name of God,” using similar (pious) expressions to everybody present. At this very moment, before he could commence a conversation, a miserable worthless wretch of a student came up and recognized32f the Shaikh, who, saying to him “I seek protection of God from the Devil, the execrable one,”32g admitted him to the interview. He then began to expound32h the verse of the Qur'ān, “Everything shall perish, except His face,”32i

addressing his discourse to Shaikh ‘Abdu-'r-Razzāq who contented himself with saying “It is indeed so,” and “Yes,” (at intervals), occasionally pointing out some allusion. Nobody else had power 19. to utter a word, awe and reverence preventing them. As for me, I was as though I was not,33 and, reviewing my sins, sat in fear lest they should have been revealed to the Shaikh, and lest my inmost being should be laid bare to the light of day,33a secretly watching all the while for an opportunity to escape from the assembly. At that moment that student asked, “Why should not the (possessive) pronoun affixed to the word wajh33b (face) be referred to some thing, as masters of the secret knowledge of God have said?” The Shaikh, the moment he heard this speech, became much agitated, and the colour of his blessed countenance33c turned to red and yellow, and he said, “Did I not, when I first set eyes on this devil, repeat the formula “We seek protection, etc.,” and now, in the manner which we have just heard, his devilry has become apparent?” And when he discovered what the student's design was he repeated several times the formula, “There is no power or strength but with God,” and quoted the following couplet from the Qaṣīda-yi-Burda:—33d

“O thou who blamest me for my pure affection, excused
“Thou art by me therefor, but had'st thou done justice thou
would'st not have blamed me.”33e

Intense love for God overpowered the Shaikh and he ordered the student to be turned out of the assembly, but afterwards, calling him back again, he appeased him, and the contemplation of this matter was a great warning to us who were present. That night passed very uncomfortably for me in the hospice, and I watched for the morning in order that I might escape. The early morning prayers34 were recited with the Shaikh at the moment the true dawn began to appear, when we could not see one another's faces without a lamp, I indeed thinking that it was yet night. At sunrise the Shaikh came out of his cell and stood at the door of the masjid, ordering Miyāṅ Shaikh Muḥammad34a to bring for us three whatever food might be ready, and I was in great agitation of mind, ever and again endeavouring to get Miyāṅ Shaikh Muḥammad to obtain leave from his master for me to depart. The holy Shaikh, with his Qur'ān in one hand and salt in the other 20. was appositely expounding the blessed verse, “Make ready then against them what force ye can, and squadrons of horse,”34b and so on to the end of the verse, ignoring my application for leave to depart. Apropos of what he was saying he then mentioned, in a most affectionate manner, Ḥusain Khan, who was at that time in the pargana of Isaulī,34c and said, “He is my son.”34d Then, following the dictates of his generous nature, which led him to bestow on every one, rich or poor, a piece of gold, or salt, or some other gift, he gave to me a tanka.

Of the miracles which I saw him perform, when I made that journey to visit him, this was one. As we three35 were on the road to Ambeṭhī, journeying to pay our respects to the Shaikh (the road-police) had arrested a man dressed as beggar on a charge of theft and highway robbery, and had seized him by his clothes.35a He in some way managed to effect his escape, and in that very hour came begging to the holy Shaikh; but notwithstanding all his persistence and lamentation the Shaikh gave him nothing. We who were present were much astonished, as we had often witnessed instances of the Shaikh's generosity. The Shaikh at once opposed and objected to35b (our expressions of surprise) saying, “Look at the35c thief, who both robs on the highway and poses as a beggar,” and he drove him out of our assembly. This caused great astonishment, and when we looked closely at the man we recognized him as the same person whom the road-police had laid hands on.

On the same day another occurrence, similar to this, took place, but an account of it would occupy much space.

On the last day of Ramaẓān, in the year already mentioned, we were travelling rapidly at night35d with Ḥusain Khān, from his pargana to Ambeṭhī, and all our efforts were centred on reaching that place in time to recite the early morning prayers36 in company with the Shaikh. The dawn had already appeared when, at three kurūh36a distance from Ambeṭhī, we put spurs to our horses, and regretted that we were not in time for the public prayers.36b We reached the Shaikh's masjid in Ambeṭhī as the sun was about to rise. At that moment the holy Shaikh, having come out of his house, was just commencing his prayers with the “Allāhu Akbar,”36c 21. and he broke off, and we thought that we were just too late, but we nevertheless attained the great honour (which we sought). Now this act of the Shaikh was contrary to his usual custom, for he always recited the early morning prayers at a time when we thought that the true dawn had hardly appeared.

It chanced that towards the close of the same day the Shaikh was explaining the mysticism of the Ṣūfīs36d in the masjid, and he read some36e verses from the Dīvān of Khāja Hāfiẓ.36f One of the companions of the late Ḥusain Khān asked whose disciple Khāja Ḥāfiẓ was, and the Shaikh said, “He was the disciple of Khāja Naqshband,”37 (may God sanctify his soul!) Another, apropos of the same subject, asked “How was horse-flesh regarded in the religion of the greatest of the Imāms?”37a (i.e., was it lawful food or not?) The Shaikh replied that the greatest of the Imāms himself ate horse-flesh, and when he reached this couplet:—

“The Ṣūfīs celebrate in one moment two ‘īds (great feasts)
“Spiders make pemmican of a fly.”37b

then I too, trusting in my own singleness of heart, thoughtlessly asked, “What is meant by the ‘two ‘īds?’” This question annoyed the Shaikh and he angrily said, “Let Bāyazid37c and Junaid,37d or Shiblī37e and Manṣūr37f ask such a question as this. What have you to do with such a question?” And falling into this vein he spoke much on the subject, and I, hanging my head with shame, repented my indiscretion. Ḥusain Khān, biting his finger with consternation, looked ever and anon towards me, and his friends were all bewildered. Suddenly my lot was lightened by the rising of the (joyful) clamour which is heard on the appearance of the new moon of the ‘īd,38 and all rose and busied themselves in mutual congratulations and hand-shakings. I rose, and on the plea of being fatigued went to recite my evening prayers in a tent which was pitched in a garden beside the masjid, feeling sick of life. When the holy Shaikh, going indoors, set food before his guests, he asked “Where is such an one?”38a (i.e., Badāonī), Shaikh Muḥammad, his worthy successor,38b answered, “By reason of the 22. impertinence of which he was guilty he could not appear in the masjid, and he absented himself also from the public prayers. The Shaikh then sent me some food from his own table, with his blessing, and I was somewhat consoled, and entertained hopes of forgiveness. Early the next morning Ḥusain Khān went to Lakhnau, to join in celebrating the ‘īd there, and I alone remained in Ambeṭhī. The holy Shaikh recited the prayers of the festival in his masjid and afterwards occupied himself in giving instruction in the book known as the ‘Awārif.38c Meanwhile Shaikh Muḥammad rose up to intercede for me, and asked that my fault might be forgiven. The Shaikh sent for me, and breaking off his teaching turned to me with great kindness, and when I, my eyes full of tears, placed my head on his foot, he embraced me and said “I bear no enmity or malice in my heart against anybody. Whatever I say is in the way of advice and spiritual instruction to the slaves of God, and abuse from me, as was the case with abuse from the prophet of God, (may God bless and save him), has on its object the same effect as praise (from another), and even if I utter a curse on anybody it has the same effect as a blessing.39 Then, in affection, taking his cap from his blessed head, he gave it to me, and took me apart into the cell which was in the gate-house, and said “Perform your ceremonial ablutions in my presence, and recite your prayers.” I recited them wonderingly. He said to me, “Men say of me that I do not instruct students. What instruction can I give? My instruction and religious teaching are just this much, a tongue never weary of praising God and a thankful heart.” Then he became agitated like a stormy surging sea and said “My life is instruction sufficient for seekers after God, and walkers in His way.”39a Just then two darvīshes from Sindh, breaking the Shaikh's custom, began to sing outside an Indian melody in mournful and grating tones, and my spiritual condition underwent a change39b by means of the influence brought to bear on me at that time. Apropos of this (influence) the Shaikh said that the great companions (of Muḥammad),39c (may God be gratified with them!), when they saw that the desert ‘Arabs newly converted to Islam were much affected by hearing the glorious Qur'ān read, 23. regretted their own state, and the leader of the faithful, Abū-Bakr, the faithful witness of the truth, (may God be gratified with him!), said, “We were like you, but afterwards our hearts became hard: that is to say, they became firmly fixed and immoveable, so that they were like stones for lack of ability to be softened.”40 Then the Shaikh read some sentences which were quite unfamiliar to my ear, and gave me permission to use the following prayer constantly:—“O God, I seek protection of Thee against deafness, dumbness, madness, leprosy, and leucoderma.” 40a When I took my leave and came to Lakhnau I made a stay of some days there, and the Shaikh would sometimes send me a piece of salt, which he used generally to hold in his hand and lick when in an assembly, reciting this saying of Muḥammad, “Salt is a cure for seventy diseases, except death.”40b And he would sometimes also send me some uncooked40c rice, and sometimes an earthenware jar, and other presents, and he received my younger brother, the late Shaikh Muḥammad, into the company of his disciples and pupils, and in a short time, being blessed40d with the holy Shaikh's regard he acquired angelic qualities and a love for the practice of ascetism. He generally observed the continued fast,40e and spent his time in reading the glorious Qur'ān, in reciting God's praises, in exorcism, and in works of supererogation, so that not one hour of his precious life was wasted, or was passed in idleness, as mine has been.

“In respect of rose-water and the rose the decree of fate
from time without beginning has been this,
“That the former is a courtesan of the market-place, and
the latter a chaste and curtained dame.”

And at that time he left the world, and it is certain that, preserving his faith intact, he retired to the garden of Riẓwān.41 The venerable age of the holy Shaikh extended to more than eighty years, and even at that great age he begat children, and 24. his departure from this abode of decay took place in the year H. 979 (A.D. 1571-72).

X. SHAIKH BHĪKAN OF KĀKŌRĪ.41a

Kākōrī41b is a pargana town in the Sarkār of Lakhnau. The Shaikh was the most learned of the learned men of his time, abstemious and well versed in the holy law, while in devout piety even the greatest of the Imāms41c (Abū Ḥanīfah) was his inferior. For many years he was engaged in teaching and in instructing the people. He had committed the whole of the glorious word (of God) to memory, according to each of the seven methods of reading it. He used also to give instruction in Shāṭibī.41d He reckoned his spiritual succession from Mīr Sayyid Ibrāhīm of Irīj,41e (may God sanctify his soul!) who was himself the most learned of the learned men of his time. The Shaikh would never mention the Ṣūfī mysteries in a public assembly, but only in private, to those who had been initiated in their secrets and one of his sayings was “If the mystical profession of the Unity of God42 be made in public it turns again solely to him who uttered it, or to the learned men (present).”

He would not listen to singing, and outwardly reprobated it. He left numerous children who attained perfection, all of whom were adorned with the embellishment of rectitude, piety, wisdom, knowledge, and excellence.

The compiler of these historical selections was honoured, in company with the late Muḥammad Ḥusain Khān,42a by being permitted to pay his respects to the Shaikh in Lakhnau. It was the blessed month of Ramaẓān, and a certain one brought to the Shaikh a work on logic, asking him to set him a task in that book. The Shaikh said “You should read some book on divinity.”

The Shaikh's death occurred in the year H. 981 (A.D. 1573-4).

XI. SHAIKH SA‘DĪ.

He also was one of the more esteemed among holy men. His line of spiritual descent came through his own revered father, Shaikh Muḥammad (may God render his soul fragrant). Shaikh Muḥammad wrote a commentary in Persian on Shāṭibī,42b which covered nearly seventy quires of paper. His true successor, 25. Shaikh Sa'dī, was subject to fits of overpowering religious ecstasy, and was pure both in body and soul. He was ever cheerful and light of heart, and lived happy and free from care. To one of his friends he wrote in a letter, when saying farewell to him:—

“Thy Sa'dī's eyes and heart are with thee on thy way,
“So deem not that thou goest alone, they bide with thee
alway.”
His death occurred in the year H. 1002 (A.D. 1593-4).

XII. SAYYID TĀJU-'D-DĪN, OF LAKHNAU.43

He was one of the successors of Shaikh Muḥammad Ghauṯ,43a and was a master of the art of exorcism. He had a great reputation for asceticism, holy poverty, and resignation, and was generous and open-handed. He came to Lakhnau, where very many were honoured by converse with him, and received from him permission to give instruction in religious matters. There he died.

XIII. SHAIKH MUḤAMMAD QALANDAR OF LAKHNAU.43b

In his youth he served in the army, in the reign of Sulṭān Ibrāhīm Lodī,43c but43d when the Emperor Bābar conquered India he gave up that profession for a life of holy poverty, sacrificing all his ambition thereto.43e He became a disciple of Shaikh Buhlūl, devoting himself to the service of God and to asceticism. From his spiritual instructor he learnt the proper use of some of the names of God in exorcism, and lived the life of a recluse in a garden, most of the trees of which had been planted by himself, shutting in his own face the door of entry into and exit from the houses of other men. They used to say that for more than thirty years his food had been nothing but milk alone, and that he never used pulse or any sort of food other than (milk). One day when Muḥammad Ḥusain Khān, accompanied by me, went to visit him, a cat came up to the Shaikh mewing piteously. The Shaikh said “This cat has cause of complaint, for you have wasted both her time and the time of the master of the house, 26. causing it to be passed in frivolity, and distracting my heart.”

XIV. SHAIKH NIẒĀMU-'D-DĪN44
OF NĀRNŌL.

Nārnol44a is one of the famous cities of India. Although the Shaikh was the disciple of Shaikh Khānūn of the Cishtī44b order, who was settled in the fort of Gwāliyār, he always declared that he acquired most of his excellence, and education, as well as the spiritual succession, from his own elder brother, Shaikh Isma‘īl by name. He was a Ṣūfī who had attained the first stage of recognition of God,44c had overcome his desires, and had acquired complete hope in God's mercy. He was thoroughly acquainted with the (spiritual) condition of those who had retired from the world and had chosen the religious life, and possessed great influence over them. I have heard that he used to order the darvīshes of his hospice, during eclipses of the moon, to take oil of the Celastrus,44d (a medicine well-known in India, on which treatises, describing its virtues, have been written, and of the properties of which the author has had some small experience), and that under its influence the truth about the next world44e was revealed to them, and that he used to recount to them44f other wonderful matters—but God knows the truth.

He remained seated on the throne of religious guidance for nearly forty years, and from early youth to the end of his life there were very few years in which he did45 not make a pilgrimage on foot, inflamed with strong desire and fervour, losing no time on the way, to the shrine of that holy pole-star of the world, Khāja Quṭbu-'d-dīn Bakhtyār of Ūsh,45a (may God sanctify his tomb!). Towards the end of his life, owing to old age, and other things which hindered him (from performing this pilgrimage), he used to celebrate the festival45b of the sainted Khāja in Nārnōl. In abandoning all outward show he followed the footsteps of his spiritual guide, and in his freedom from ceremoniousness and formality he regarded rich and poor alike, observing the same impartiality also in admitting disciples. I saw him when he was surrounded by a crowd, and so did not attain to the honour of 27. conversing with him. His death took place in the year H. 997, (A.D. 1588-9,) and the words “Alas for Niẓām”45c were found to give the date.

XV. SHAIKHU-'L-HIDYA OF KHAIRĀBĀD.45d

He was profoundly learned and in early life spent many years in teaching and giving instruction. He was a disciple of Shaikh Ṣafī, the spiritual successor of Shaikh Sa‘īd, and held from him a diploma, authorizing him to give religious instruction. In early life he employed45e himself to such an extent in the acquisition of exoteric knowledge that there are now living many wise men, masters of perfection, who owe their wisdom to his teaching.46 Latterly he devoted46a himself wholly to the Ṣūfī-istic rule, founding an order of devotees, vowed to personal poverty, whose rule was resignation to God, retirement from the world, and the giving of alms. A keen appreciation of the ecstatic songs and dances (of darvīshes) and an overpowering religious ecstacy were comprised in his daily system of religious exercises,46b and were never omitted. He restrained his steps from wandering to the doors of men, especially of worldly men, and those of position and rank, and on these grounds he never accepted an invitation to a feast. All his offspring and followers secured the good fortune of the assistance of the example of his practice in enduring poverty and want. One of them was his true successor46c Shaikh Abū-'l-Fatḥ, who succeeded to his prayer-mat, and is one of the most pre-eminent46d among the learned men of this time. In his rules of conduct, both outward and inward, he follows, wholly and completely, his venerable father, and he is the author of many standard works on most branches of knowledge. Never did a beggar go away disappointed from the Shaikh.

One day Muḥammad Ḥusain Khān asked the Shaikh, “What sort of a man was Sālār Mas‘ūd,46e whom the common people of India worship?” The Shaikh replied, “He was an Afghān who met his death by martyrdom.”47

Towards the end of his life, in accordance with an Imperial summons, he came to Fatḥpūr and there saw the Khalīfa47a (vice- 28. gerent) of the age. When the Emperor heard that the Shaikh, when the messenger conveyed the summons to him, set out from his hospice on foot, without allowing anything to detain him, travelling thus until his servants sent his baggage and travelling litter after him, he was much pleased. When he asked the Shaikh a question the Shaikh would make a sign to signify that he was hard of hearing, and the Emperor would give him a piece of gold. He also ordered that a subsistence allowance47b should be assigned to the Shaikh, and then immediately gave him permission to depart.

The Shaikh's death occurred in the year H. 993 (A.D. 1585). May the mercy of God be upon him!

XVI. SHAIKH DĀ‘ŪD OF CHATĪ.
(May God sanctify his soul!).

Chatī47c is the chief town of a pargana in the District of Lāhōr. The Shaikh's noble ancestors came first from the land of the ‘Arabs47d to Sītpūr,47e which is in the Multān country, and the holy Shaikh was himself born in that place. His noble father proceeded 47f from this world to eternity before his birth, and his mother died47g very shortly after it, and he, left alone, as an incomparable pearl,48 was brought up under the guardianship of his elder brother, Miyān Raḥmatu-'llāh. When they set him tasks in the reading of the Qurā'n, tears would sometimes flow over the surface of his blessed cheeks, and he would say, “Trouble me not in respect of this matter, but leave me unto God the Most High.” From this time they knew that he had no need of any acquired learning.

Couplet.

“What need had he of instruction in polite learning,
“Who was himself from the first well learned therein?”

They say that one of the two princes of both worlds, either Imām Ḥasan or Imām Ḥusain,48a (may God be gratified with them!), it cannot be decided which, taught the holy Shaikh in 29. a dream some verses from the first chapter of the Qur'ān, and sometimes when he went, to refresh his heart, to watch the play of children,48b he would dejectedly and perplexedly watch them from afar, and would say, “I see their faces scratched, their bodies48c covered with blood, and their skin torn off, and some of them appear to me as though they had lost their heads.”48d

When, after many temporal vicissitudes and various hardships, he came to the pargana town of Satgarah,48e and from there to Lāhōr, he commenced to study under Maulānā Isma‘īl of Uch,48f who had received instruction from his highness the lord Maulavī ‘Ārif-i-Jāmī, (may God sanctify his tomb!), and in early youth he read the commentary of Iṣfahānī49 with such critical acumen,49a that the best students from among the natives of the country, who were reading that book in class with him, stood49b astonished at the perspicuous quickness of his apprehension and the clearness of his intellect, and his tutor said, “Friends, just as we, in our time, used to rejoice and contend for superiority in the sight of our respected master, so too will this lad, before long, attain to such a degree of respect that the people will49c look towards him with blessing and benediction, and from his noble and profitable words will gain advantage and excellence.”49d At last he became a living witness (of the truth of) and (one might say) the source of (the saying), “Blessed is he who hath seen me or hath seen one who hath seen me.”49e

“My love, though he went not to school, nor wrote a line,
“By means of one glance instructed a hundred teachers in
(difficult) problems.”49f

And, having attained the position of a most learned sage he was rejoiced with the good news of the sacred text, “O David, verily have we made thee a vicegerent.”49g And at the very time when he was employed in the exercise of harsh and severe austerities, having conceived, by means of the attractions of God,—“which are equal to the acts of both men and jinn,”—a 30. strong craving after God, his spiritual holiness Ghauṯu-'ṯ-Ṯaqalain (may God be pleased with him!) evinced, in all circumstances, great interest in his progress, and became his helper, assister, and guardian, keeping his regard always fixed upon him, openly listening to and returning favourable answers to his petitions, until he perforce drew him, after the manner of beloved ones who are attracted, and attracted ones who are beloved,50 to the court of saintship, Divine guidance, and perfection, to the closet of propinquity (to God), to the chamber of the grandeur of God, and to the resting-place of the Holiness of the Lord of Majesty. When under the influence of this strong craving after God he used to wander bare-headed and bare-foot in the desert about Dībālpūr,50a the dwelling-place of beasts of prey, wild animals, and birds, in a spot now known as Shīrgaṛh:—

Hemistich.

“We are lovers wandering in the plains of Damascus.”50b

And sometimes when he went to circumambulate50c the blessed shrine of that holy Saint, obeyed of all the world, Ganj-i-Shakar,50d (may God sanctify his tomb!) he would there receive signs, and experience happy visions, and engage in conversation and intercourse (with the saint's spirit), a detailed account of which is beyond the limits of this hastily compiled history. They are recounted in detail in the book (known as) Naghmāt-i-Dā'ūdī,50e which was written by that cream of saints and fruit of the pure at heart, Shaikh Abū-'l-Ma‘ālī, the son of Shaikh Rahmatu-'llāh, already mentioned, the date of whose most fortunate birth may be deduced from the words “the beggar of Shaikh Dā'ūd,”51 or from the words “Abū-'l-Ma‘ālī, the worshipper of the true (God),”51a and who is now the successor of Shaikh Mīyān Dā'ūd, (may God sanctify his soul!). When he had spent a period of twenty years, or thereabouts, in ecstatic longing after God and wandering over plains and deserts, he was inspired to revert to a regular mode of life51b and to the religious instruction of the people, but since he had had no outward religious instructor and guide he hesitated to undertake the charge, until he was initiated and appointed by his spiritual holiness Ghauṯ-i-A‘ẓam51c for the following duty, namely, to assist, for the sake of preserving the spiritual succession, the reverend Shaikh Ḥāmid-i-Qādirī 31. (may God sanctify his tomb!) who was the son of Shaikh ‘Abdu-'l-Qādir the second, and the father of Shaikh ‘Abdu-'l-Qādir, 51d who at the time of writing is occupying his venerable father's place in Ucch, by drawing him (more closely) to God. And the late saint, (may God have mercy upon him!) since he had already many times asked for assistance from this disciple, who was after his own heart, and turned to him in every important business, and had asked51e that a fātiḥah51f might be offered up on his (the late saint's) behalf, delayed to draw up his blessed tree of spiritual succession and to issue a permit for perfecting of disciples until he himself went one day to the town of Satkara,52 where the saint (may God have mercy upon him!) had many times previously lodged, on which occasion, when under the influence of his ecstatic longing after God, he said, “Here is Shaikh Ghauṯ-i-A‘ẓam (may God be pleased with him!) who has come and signifies that he entrusts to me his prayer-carpet, staff, tree of spiritual succession, horse, covered litter, and all the appurtenances of Shaikh-dom and spiritual leadership.” When the saint (may God52a sanctify his tomb!) was informed from on high of that occurrence, and when his knowledge of it was afterwards completely confirmed, he entrusted the divine charge committed to him to him whom his soul desired, but who appeared as though he were the seeker (not the sought after), returning from his soaring flight (of ecstasy) to ordinary intercourse (with his fellow creatures), and spread the mat of sojourning in the newly-built town of Shīrgaṛh, near to Chatī,52b and half-way between Multān and Pattan, started a new order, the Qādirīyyah,52c which is midway between the two exalted orders, Sahrawardiyyah and Cishtiyyah,52d (blessings on them, all three, from God!) and in the Divine power and by means of close connection with the true God, he so carried forward52e the work that the sound issuing therefrom will not die away52f until the sounding of the last trump.

When Mullā ‘Abdu-'llāh of Sulṭānpūr, who was known as Makhdūmu-'l-Mulk, girded his loins to strenuous efforts in uprooting the men of God,53 becoming the means of the death of several of them, he sent an imperial order in the name of Salīm53a Shāh Sūr, the Afghān, from Gwāliyār, summoning the holy Miyāṅ among others, in obedience to which 32. order the Miyāṅ set out in haste with one or two attendants, and, meeting Makhdūmu-'l-Mulk, outside Gwāliyār, with marks of the greatest53b respect,53c alighted in a spot where he sat down with him, and where a beneficial conversation took place. The pernicious mischief-makers, as soon as they witnessed this conversation, fled away to every corner, so that they could not be discovered even by search being made. Makhdūmu-'l-Mulk said, “Their report is not on this ground (alone) falsified.”53d After much talk and conversation the Shaikh asked “What was the real motive for summoning us religious mendicants?” Makh-dūmu-'l-Mulk replied, “I heard that your disciples, when performing the religious exercise of ẕikr, said ‘O Dā'ūd, O Dā'ūd!’” The Shaikh replied “There has probably been some mistake in hearing, owing to a similarity of sounds, or else my followers must have said ‘O Wadūd, O Wadūd!’”53e In connection with this matter the Shaikh remained for a whole day, or a whole night,53f

bestowing on him sublime exhortations and advice, and imparting to him precious knowledge and facts relating to God.54 Makh-dūmu-'l-Mulk was much affected and dismissed the Shaikh from that place with honour.

On one occasion the austerity and piety of Miyāṅ Ḥisāmu-'d-dīn of Ṭalamba,54a may God have mercy upon him! (some of whose glorious attributes are mentioned in the Najātu-'r-Rashīd) happened to be the subject of conversation in the noble assembly of the Shaikh, and he said “Ah, what a pity was it that the Miyāṅ failed in personal desire of and love for God, and was the slave of mere morality:—

Hemistich.

“Thou hast kept one thing, and (many) things are lost to thee.”
“Beware, at the last,54b from whom thou remainest apart.”54c

The liberality and charity of the Shaikh's disposition were such 33. that on certain fixed occasions,54d either once or twice in the year, he scattered abroad in promiscuous charity54e all the money and goods that he had received gratuitously, and he and his chaste wife kept nothing in the cell that was their dwelling but an earthen pot and a piece of old matting, and when he saw that his treasure-chest was full he would again in the same manner disburse its contents in promiscuous charity,54f and notwithstanding this (profusion), on the birth-day and feast-day of the holy Ghauṯ-i-A‘ẓam (may God be pleased with him!) all the needs54g of the pilgrims, whether of high or low degree, who, to the number of nearly a hundred thousand souls, more or less, were gathered together, were met by disbursements from the alms-chest of his hospice, and that profusion, praise be to God, is still continued, nay rather, is increased many fold. Some of the auspicious utterances of his inspired tongue, the interpreter of divine truths, are as follows:—55

“In the name of God, the Director and Guide in the darkness of occans and deserts.” I have many times seen and experienced the efficiency of this holy saying in positions of fear55a and danger. Another is:—

“Praised be He in respect of Whose Essence our thoughts are
bewildered,
“Praised be He in respect of the understanding of Whom our
understanding soars.”55b

And there are many other examples of such prayers, praises ẕikrs and choice phrases, and the signet-ring posy of that holy man, composed by himself, was as follows:—

“Dā'ūd has been effaced in name and trace
“For poverty effaces all traces.”

When I, the author of these pages, in the time of Bairām Khān, (that best of times, when India was as a bride,)55c was a student in Āgra, I heard from certain darvīshes great reports of the Shaikh's noble and majestic attributes, and from that time forward I sowed 34. the seed of attachment to and trust in him in the ground of preparation (for meeting him) and was in secret a slave to this desire (of meeting him).

Hemistich.
“Aye, verily55d
doth the ear, in true lovers, outstrip55e
the eye.”

And at that very time I repeatedly made attempts to go and pay my respects to that holy man, clothing myself in the pilgrim's garment meet for the circumambulation of that threshold around which the angels do go, and set out56 for Shīrgaṛh (with this object). But sometimes my father, who has now obtained pardon and forgiveness of his sins, withstood me and turned me back in the way, and sometimes I was let by other hindrances, which were the means of disappointing me of the fruition of that good fortune. A period of twelve years passed over me, thus expectant, before one of the servants of that court, Shaikh Kālū by name, a solitary traveller, who had himself56a formerly been the means of my secret knowledge of the Shaikh, like the humā, from hidden regions cast his shadow on Badāon and its environs, and said to me, “Is it not a pity that the holy Miyāṅ (Shaikh Dā'ūd) should be in the land of the living and that you should (be content to) rest with hope unfulfilled and should not even once see him?” This soul-subduer kindled a fire in my perplexed soul, and the Most High God provided the means (of the fulfilment of my desire), for Muḥam-mad Ḥusain Khān, in whose56b personal service I was, went in pursuit of Ibrāhīm Ḥusain Mīrzā from Kānt u Gūla56c towards the Panjāb, and the means of attaining that happiness were thus prepared 56d for me, so that, as has been already mentioned,56e I went to Shīrgaṛh from Lāhōr, and saw with my own eyes a portion of the (spiritual) beauty of the holy man—and what possessor of beauty can be compared to him? As he smiled and spoke light sparkled from his teeth,56f a light which illuminated the dark abode of the heart, and from which the secret of the Countenance of God was manifested. In short for the space of three or four days I acquired some advantage from this transitory life.

Few days passed on which Hindus, to the number of fifty or a hundred, more or less (on each day), did not come with their families and kindred to pay their respects to that holy man, receiving the high honour of conversion to Islām, and obtaining 35. instruction in the faith.57 I found the gates and walls and trees and dwellings of that delectable town filled with the sound of the telling of rosaries and the reciting of God's praises, and the Shaikh bestowed on me his auspicious cap, saying,57a “Be57b thou my deputy to thine own people, for (thus to appoint a deputy) is my wont,” and he sent a kerchief and a veil from his chaste wife57c to my wives57d and children, and when I made a representation to him, saying, “If you bestow on me the gift of a shirt, it will be light upon light.” After some reflection he said “That also will arrive in due time.” Having disclosed to him some of the secrets of my heart and my designs and intentions, I endeavoured to obtain leave to depart. At this point57e that holy man left his masjid in his closed travelling litter, owing to his great weakness, and set out for my first halting-place. I, taking the pole of the litter on my shoulder, walked for some paces with it. While I was thus employed a powerful fit of weeping overcame me, and the Shaikh, stopping the litter, said, “Put me down.” He alighted, and sat down, and spoke so much of the knowledge and love of God, the Most High, that my agitation re-doubled. One day, at the time of leave-taking, I represented, through Mīyāṅ ‘Abdu-'l-Wahhāb, one of the Shaikh's sincere companions, (to whom is applicable the text), “Blessedness awaiteth them and a goodly home,”58 that a report was current among the holy men of Hindustān that the time for the rising of a religious leader was at hand, that most of that body, (i.e., the holy men,) concurred in fixing on one of the Sayyids of that country, whose ancestors had formerly been seated on the throne of empire in Dihlī and Badāon for some time,58a that they were engaged in making preparations for a holy war and in collecting, arms,58b that they professed to have received directions58c from the holy Ghauṯ-i-A‘ẓam 58d (may God be pleased with him!) to engage in this affair, and that they had implicated with themselves some of the Amīrs on the frontier, and that some of them professed to have received supernatural encouragement during their assemblies and when they were in difficulties, and purposed to bring the object of their desire to an issue. The Shaikh asked me, “What 36. is that Sayyid's mode of life, and condition?” I said “He is a man who lives a retired life, in holy poverty,58e conformably to the sacred law, a recluse and an ascetic who has resigned himself to God, passing most of his days among the tombs (of holy men) and his nights in his cell in worship and submission to God, but he is a man of good family,59 unrivalled and incomparable in his knowledge of the military art, of excellent moral character and following a most worthy mode of life.” The Shaikh said “The members of that body (i.e., the holy men), are no true darvīshes, in that they so traduce the holy Ghauṯ,59a and do him violence now that he can no longer help himself,59b and those spiritual encouragements and signs are all part of the delusions of Satan, for how could the holy Ghauṯ (may God be pleased with him!) countenance such matters as this, he whose rule it always was that the people should expel the love of the world from their hearts, and, in all candour and sincerity, should set their faces towards the love of God, the Most High, abandoning vain desires and lusts, and not that one should turn aside from the path of worship, asceticism and holy endeavour to fall again into the net of the world, which is the enemy of God? Say to that Sayyid from me, “May God the Most High vouchsafe to you grace to stand fast in the path which you hold. If the least suspicion of any desire for evanescent delights remains (in your heart), it behoves you to strive to overcome it, and not to be beguiled by the impostures and misrepresentations of a bewildered band of know-nothings,59c thereby straying from the path. Though the lover of the world should attain to kingship,—the supreme object of worldly men, and the seeker after the (sensual) joys of paradise59d should reach the rewards bestowed by the Everlasting God, that is, the maidens and mansions59e of the next world, and the lover of God60 should die of grief from the utter hopelessness of attaining his object, yet is the disappointment of this last a thousand-fold60a better and more happy than the fruition and 37. attainment of desire experienced by the former two classes of poor-spirited men.” And the Shaikh, speaking on this subject, scattered amongst us so many jewels of profitable advice that pearl-like tears began to fall from the eyes of those that heard him, upon the skirts of their robes, and, that (worldly) object being forgotten, we were thrown into quite a different frame of mind, one above description, and60b in that state of burning anguish I bade the Shaikh adieu, uttering cries of grief.

“My heart, in the hope that one cry might perchance reach
thee,
“Has uttered in this mountain lamentations such as were
never uttered by Farhād.”

And since the roads between Lāhōr and Shīrgaṛh were, in consequence of the rebellion60c of the Ulugh Baigī Mīrzās,60d closed, both at the time of my going to Shīrgaṛh and at the time of my return, and as I was alone, the Shaikh gave me an attendant as a guide, who was to take me to Shaikh Abū Isḥāq-i-Mihrang in Lāhōr,60e one of the most noted of the holy man's deputies, in order that he might arrange to send me with a caravan to the army of Ḥusain Khān, which had come to Lāhōr from Ṭalamba, and was to proceed thence to Kānt-u-Gūla. “When I reached Lāhōr I set out for Hindustān with Ḥusain Khān's men.” I was sitting one day at our halting-place at Sahāranpūr61 in a garden, consumed with grief at my separation from that holy man, when a traveller brought to me a Qādirī61a shirt, which he had in his hand, saying, “Take this, which I received from the hand of a venerable saint, and give me something to help me on my way.”61b When I questioned him as to the truth of the matter he said, “When Mīrzā Ibrāhīm Ḥusain met with that mischance61c I, with a party of his troops, overwhelmed with misfortune and a prey to plunderers, arrived stripped and naked at Shīrgaṛh, where we attached ourselves to the holy saint, our helper, and he gave something to each of us. When my turn came round he took this 38. shirt off his blessed body, and bestowed it upon me. I, thinking that it would be irreverent to wear it, deposited it in safe custody, with a view to taking it away to some place as a rare gift; and now I leave it with you.” I received from him that mysteriously conveyed gift, that treasure wafted to me by the wind, as though it had been a blessing and benediction.

Verses.

The perfume of thy shirt has reached me,
My soul was ravished by that sweet odour.
I had offered a fātiḥah61d for union with thee,
Praise be to God that my fātiḥah was accepted.

And, remembering the word that he had spoken, I regarded this occurrence as a miracle,61e and I now preserve that Joseph's coat61f as I preserve my life—and praise be to God for all this!

Verses.

And as I have been the companion of desire for his excellency
From the cradle, I hope that (that desire) will continue to
the grave.

Verses.

Desire for thee within my mind, and love for thee within my
heart,
Did enter me with mother's milk, and with my life will leave
me.

The following is a brief account of that holy man. He was the cynosure62 of his time, an inspired prophet, and a worker of wonders and manifest miracles, giving clear proofs of his sanctity.62a He had undergone severe discipline62b and in holy endeavour had striven much. In early life62c he acquired exoteric knowledge and had also been engaged in teaching. He had resigned himself to God and lived an eremite, going never to the houses of worldly men but once, when in obedience to the (royal) command he went from Shīrgaṛh to Gwāliyār to see Salīm Shāh,62d and although the Khalīfah of the age,62e when he was proceeding to Patan sent Shahbāz Khān62f to summon the Shaikh to bestow on him the honour of a visit, the Shaikh made his excuses, saying, 39. “My secret prayers are sufficient.” He avoided to the utmost of his power the companionship of the lords of the earth, investing himself with the cloak of “Poverty is my glory.”63 He was constant in almsgiving, and in pointing out to searchers after truth the path of holiness, and whosoever was so aided by fortune as to be led to the Shaikh received great profit from the precious utterances of that blessing of the age and cynosure63a of the world. In the year H. 982 (A.D. 1574-5) his tent was pitched under the curtain of the Majesty of God the Most High, and in the Court of union with Him, may His glory be exalted! The words “Ah, Shaikh Dā'ūd the Saint!”63b were found to give the date (of his death). May God bestow upon him His boundless mercy, and raise us with him in that hour when all shall be gathered together.63c

XVII. SHAIKH63d
ABAN OF AMROHA.63e

He was a traveller in the path (of righteousness) and was mysteriously attracted (by the love of God), but notwithstanding this he neglected not one jot of the observances of the pure Law.63f Many miracles are related as having been performed by him. He lived and received disciples without pomp or ceremony. When I after waiting upon the holy Miyāṅ Shaikh Dā'ūd64 (may his honoured tomb be sanctified!) was returning from the Panjāb and travelled to Badāon by way of Amroha, I paid my respects to the Sayyid already mentioned.64a He read a verse from the glorious word (of God), and delivered an address, not on any fixed theme,64b but now and again he would turn to me and make some remarks on the excellence of the reward and recompense64c reserved for the long-suffering, and he quoted the blessed text “But good works, which are lasting…”64d and so on to the end of the verse. And it afterwards64e became manifest that this was an indication of the occurrence of a calamity which happened to me. The facts were briefly thus: I had a daughter, whom I dearly loved, and while I was on this journey65 she passed away in Badāon from this deceitful world. Probably those consoling subjects were (mentioned) for the comfort of my 40. heart—but God knows all!

The Shaikh's death occurred in the year H. 987 (A.D. 1579).

literally, “let it not be concealed,” a common form of commencing a history.

Niẓāmu-'d-Dīn Aḥmad, vide Āīn-i-Akbarī passim. His history is generally known as the Ṭabaqāt-i-Akbarī.

Such expressions as this explain Badāonī's reason for keeping this history secret. The literal translation is “and have not been pardoned.”

I.e., “were I to mention these men at all I could only mention them in such a manner as would lead to my being persecuted, for I will not give praise where it is not due. I will therefore keep silence regarding them.”

Two pious ejaculations in Arabic, the former, which is one of the , or traditional sayings of Muḥammad, denouncing flatterers, while the latter prays for protection from tyrants.

These are evidently the persons intended by the word . Badāonī as a good Muslim was much scandalized by the strange freaks of the followers of this new religion of Akbar's.

The reference to the idiomatic use of the word (ḥarf) “a letter of the alphabet” as in the phrase , “to talk,” is hard to reproduce in a translation. The meaning of the line is:—“The letters (or sounds) of which their talk is composed do not spell (or make) sense.”

lit., ‘dustbin,’ otherwise ‘the furnace used for heating a bath.’ The unsavouriness of the latter would be due to the nature of the fuel used.

A fabulous bird, described as being “known as to name, but unknown as to body.” Its abode is in Qāf, a mountain encircling the world, which may be described in much the same terms as is the bird. In practical, as opposed to mythical geography, the name is given to the Caucasus.

This Arabic couplet is clearly a parody on the opening couplet of the fourth qaṣīdah of the . In the second hemistich the word appears in the text, and also in MSS. (A) and (B). This does not make sense. I prefer to read .

in the text, despite the clear meaning of the passage and the authority of both MSS.

Sambhal was then the principal town of the Sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Dihlī. It is now a Taḥṣīl town and Municipality in the Murādābād District. N.-W. P.

Vide Vol. I (trans. Ranking), p. 428.

I.e., the ecstasy of the Ṣūfīs, or mystics of Islām, which will be described hereafter.

Now a municipal town in the Sarāī Sidhū Taḥṣīl of the Multān District, Panjāb. (Hunter's “Imperial Gazetteer of India,” xiii., 163.) Vide Badāonī I. (trans. Ranking), p. 389 n 2.

A family and order of ascetics. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. III. trans. Jarrett, pp. 354, 357, 361, 369, 370, 422. Also Tūzuk-i-Jahāngīrī, ‘Alīgaṛh edition (1864), p. 1, and preface, pp. 3, 4. Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I. (trans. Bloch-mann), p. 309, Qānūn-i-Islām (Ja‘far Sharīf and Dr. Herklots) ed., 1832, p. 289, and Akbarnāma text, p. 154.

A town in the Sarkār of Sambhal, Ṣūba of Dihlī. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I. (trans. Jarrett), p. 289.

There are two Qaṣīdahs which go by this name. The former, the original Qaṣīdatu-'l-burdah, was written by Ka‘bu-'bnu-Zuhair, in praise of Muḥammad, during the latter's lifetime. Muḥammad bestowed upon the poet as a reward his own burdah or cloak of striped cloth of Yaman. Hence the name given to the poem. The latter was written by Shaikh Sharafu-'d-Dīn Abū ‘Abdu-‘llāh Muḥammad bin Sa‘īd Būṣīrī, who died in 694 A.H. (1294 A.D.), and was at first named Al Kawākibu-'d-darrīyah or “glittering stars.” various reasons are given for the bestowal on it of the name Qaṣīdatu-'l-burdah . This latter poem was also written in praise of Muḥammad. (Vide Ḥājī Khalfā Fluegel, 1845, Vol. IV., 523-533.) The latter poem is the better known of the two, and it was probably this that Badāonī learnt.

This book was probably the Kanzu-'d-daqā, iq fi furū‘i-'l-Ḥanafiyyah by Shaikh Al Imām Abū-'l-Barakāt ‘Abdu-'llāhi bni-Aḥmad, known as Ḥāfiẓu-'ddīni-'n-Nasafi vide Ḥājī Khalfā, Vol. V. (ed. 1850), pp. 249-253. The author died in 710 A.H. (1310 A.D.).

(Shajara) or (Shajar-nāma) a list of saints, or holy predecessors, which is drawn up in the form of a genealogical tree, and should go back to the time of Muḥammad. It is delivered into the hands of a student when he is made either a murīd (disciple) or Khalīfah (deputy) as evidence of his spiritual descent. Vide Qānūn-i-Islām by Ja‘far Sharīf and Dr. Herklots (1832), pp. 283, 300.

(darvīsh-i-dānishmand) giving the figures
4 + 200 + 6 + 10 + 300 + 4 + 1 + 50 + 300 + 40 + 50 + 4 = 969.

Vide supra, note 1.

Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I. (trans. Blochmann), pp. 538, 546, and Vol. III. (trans. Jarrett), p. 374. ‘Abdu-'l-Quddūs asserted that he was descended from Abū Ḥanīfah. He died in A.H. 959 (A.D. 1543) and was buried at Gangoh, where he had lived. Gangoh is a town now in the Sahāranpūr Dist. N.-W. P.

The translation may not perhaps render the meaning of this couplet clear, owing to a confusion of terms. The word (misṭar) means “a ruler,” the instrument for ruling lines. In the original Persian a comparison is drawn between the prominent veins of an emaciated old man, grown old in the way of holiness, and the ruler which directs the pen, or rather the hand of him who holds the pen, in a straight line.

The text omits the words (bar khāstan) “to rise up,” as does also MS. (B). In inserting them I follow MS. (A).

The miraculous part of this fact is that the ceremonial prayers of Muslims contain various genuflexions and prostrations, in addition to the standing position. The ceremonial prayers are recited five times every day. This was no mean performance for an old man of 93 who had no strength to rise or stand on ordinary occasions. If what Badāonī says is true the probability is that Shaikh Jalālu-'d-Dīn, finding that the regular ceremonial prayers so exhausted him that he could not undergo any exertion in addition to them, kept his bed except at prayer times, reserving all his strength for his religious exercises.

Lands held on aima tenure were rent-free grants given as madad-i-ma‘ā sh, or subsistence allowance, to deserving individuals. For an account of the troubles that used to befall persons who came to Court on business connected with aima holdings vide Badāonī, Vol. II. text pp. 204-5, trans. pp. 207-8.

A maḥall in the sarkār of Sarhind, Ṣūbah of Dihlī and a place of pilgrimage among the Hindus (Āīn-i-Akbarī (trans.), Vol. II. 281). It is now a small town in the Ambāla district, Panjāb.

This happened before Badāonī left the service of Ḥusain Khān for that of the Emperor. Ḥusain Khān, nicknamed Tukriya, or “the patcher,” from his having ordered Hindus, as unbelievers, to wear a patch on their garments near the shoulders, was “the Bayard and the Don Quixote of Akbar's reign” (Blochmann). For accounts of him vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I. (trans. Blochmann), p. 372. He was Badāonī's first patron. Ulugh Mīrzā (whose name had been changed from Sikandar to Ulugh by the Emperor Hūmāyūn) was the elder son of Ulugh Mīrzā, the eldest son of Muḥammad Sulṭān Mīrzā of the House of Tīmūr. Muḥammad Sulṭān Mīrzā was the great-great-grandson of ‘Umar Shaikh Mīrzā, the second son of Tīmūr. He was thus a distant cousin of Akbar.

Gwalior, the famous fortress.

Shaikh Bāyazīd of Busṭām (a small town in the hills of Ṭabaristān, between the ancient city of Rai and Nīshāpūr) was originally named Ṭaifūr, and founded the Ṭaifūriyah order of ascetics. He is said to have been born in A.H. 136 (A.D. 753-4) and to have died at Busṭām, the date of his death being variously given as A.H. 231, 234, 261, 262 and 269. One of his “spiritual descendants” was Shaikh ‘Abdu-'llāh-i-Shaṭṭārī, was founded the Shaṭṭārī order. He came from Persia to India and died in Mālwā, where he is buried, in A.H. 809 (A D. 1406). Jahāngīr erected a mausoleum over his tomb in Māndū. The word (Shaṭṭārī) is derived from the Arabic root (Shaṭara) meaning “he travelled in the direction of.” Its meaning as applied to ‘Abdu-'llāh and his followers is “one who outstrips and is quick in attaining nearness to God.” In the language of the order (‘ilm-i-Shaṭārah) means “the working and aspirations of the soul.” From the facts of Badāonī applying the title Sulṭān to Shaikh Bāyazīd, and of Shaikh Muḥammad's penance of twelve years it is pretty clear that their conceptions of Bāyazīd were coloured by the ridiculous Indian legends concerning him,—unsavoury stories shewing a strong bias towards Hindu superstitions, and coined by wandering faqīrs in order to invest with a spurious sanctity a cenotaph which they had erected in Bāyazīd's name at Cātgānv (Chittagong).

The famous fort on the Ganges, nineteen miles above Banāras.

Vide Qānūn-i-Islām (Ja‘far Sharīf and Dr. Herklots, 1832) c. XXIX. Shaikh Muḥammad wrote a book under the title of (Aljawāhiru-'l-Khams) “the five jewels.” It is divided into five parts:—(1) on the worship of God, (2) on the ascetic life, (3) on exorcism, (4) on the recital of God's praises, (5) on the acts of those followers of the true path who have attained to knowledge.

Vide art. in Sprenger's edition of the Iṣṭilāḥāta-'ṣ-Ṣūfiyyah .

MSS. (A) and (B) have a word which looks like (phūl) but (Buhlūl) is undoubtedly the correct reading.

The text omits the words after , although they appear in both MSS.

The text omits the word after , although it appears in both MSS. Shaikh Wajihu-'d-Dīn is mentioned in the Ṭabaqāt-i-Akbarī, vide also Āīn-i-Akbarī I. (trans. Blochmann) passim and Akbarnāma (text), III. 63-744.

i.e., have “sat at his feet.”

The famous Bairām Khān, Khān-i-Khānan, also entitled Khān Bābā. He was Akbar's atālīq or tutor. He was assassinated by an Afghān named Mubārak on the 14th Jamādī I. A H. 968 (A.D. 1561).

Shaikh Gadāī was a Shī‘ah who had been appointed Ṣadru-'ṣ-Ṣudūr on the recommendation of Bairām Khān, whom he had joined in Gujarāt. He was Ṣadr till A.H. 968. Vide Badāonī, Vol. II, text, pp. 29, 30, trans., pp. 22, 23, 24. For the disappointment of Shaikh Muḥammad Ghauṯ at Court vide Badāonī, Vol. II, text, pp. 34, 35, trans., pp. 28, 29.

(samā‘).

(vajd).

The tanka was worth about 4d. Badāonī's statement means that Shaikh Muḥammad Ghauṯ had a yearly allowance of £166,666. 13s. 4d., or its equivalent in land. It is hardly possible that he can have possessed such a grant, either in land or money. Badāonī probably uses the word indefinitely, to signify “a large sum,” or it may be that the tanka referred to was the tanka-yi-siyāh, a copper coin, worth only 6/64 of the silver tanka, (vide Badāonī, Vol. I, trans. Ranking, p. 87, n. 1.) This would bring Shaikh Muḥammad's annual allowance to £15,625 sterling, still an incredibly large sum.

The objection of other “holy men” to the manners of Muḥammad Ghauṯ will be understood by those who have any experience of the manners, or rather lack of them, displayed by most “holy men” in India. Affecting complete indifference to all worldly matters, they too frequently attempt to establish a claim to superior sanctity by means of a demeanour of insulting indifference towards all with whom they are brought in contact. Numerous instances of this occur in history, the eccentricities of “holy men” being generally tolerated, just as the quips of professional jesters were formerly tolerated in Europe.

Literally “Beware of bringing forward the faults of others, for to do so is a fault in thee.”

i.e. and , the letters of which the word is composed. This practice may appear to be an absurd affectation of humility, but it must be remembered that too free a use of the first person, whether in writing or in conversation is, even at the present day, and among men who lay no special claim to sanctity, considered a breach of etiquette among Orientals.

There are three places of this name given by Sir W. W. Hunter in his Imperial Gazetteer of India. One is a town in Taḥsīl Sidhauli, Dist. Sītāpūr, Oudh; another is a village in the Garḥwāl State, N.-W. P.; and the third is a town in the Dholpur State, Rājputāna. I cannot identify the Miyān's abode. Bārī was also the name given by Akbar to the Dūāb between the Biyāh and the Rāvī. Four worthies of the name of Ilāhdād are commemorated in this Vol., viz: Nos. XIII, XXXV, LXIII and LXX, ch. ii.

At one time the capital of a Muḥammadan kingdom. Now the chief town of the District of the same name in the N.-W. P. Mīr Sayyid Muḥam-mad, the Mahdavī will be subsequently referred to.

(pās-i-anfās) lit. “guarding, or holding, the inspirations and respirations.” Hindūstānī (dam baṛhānā) and (dam sādhnā). A practice borrowed from Hindu ascetics.

Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I, (trans. Blochmann), pp. 320-1. He was a noble of Humāyūn's Court. Having been by Akbar appointed to the government of Mālwa, he re-conquered that province and reigned in Māndū like a king, whence the expression in the text. Akbar moved against him and he fled. After many wanderings and vicissitudes he made his way to Jaunpūr, where he died a natural death during the rebellion of Khān-i-Zamān (A.H. 974 = A.D. 1567).

(taṣawwuf) the mysticism of the Ṣūfīs.

(ẕauq). Vide Iṣṭilāḥātu-'ṣ-Ṣūfiyyah (Dr. Sprenger, 1845), p. 162.

In the previous year (A.H. 966=A.D. 1558-9) Mihr ‘Alī Khān Sildūz had been sent to Canār to treat with Jamāl Khān, the Afghān commandant, who wished to hand over the fort to the Mughals for a consideration. Jamāl Khān, however, did not deem Akbar's offer of five parganas near Jaunpūr sufficient and the negotiations fell through, whereupon Mihr ‘Alī returned to Āgra with Badāonī who had accompanied him to Canār. Mihr ‘Alī who was at this time a Beg was afterwards created Khān and Governor of Citōr (Chitor). For an account of Mihr ‘Alī's mission vide Badāonī, Vol. II., text, pp. 32-34; trans., pp. 26-28. Mihr ‘Alī had evidently a great regard for Badāonī. Sildūz is the name of a Caghatai clan.

The opening chapter of the Qur'ān. Its recital, in combination with a gift made to a holy man, forms an offering to God.

giving 300 + 10 + 600 + 1 + 6 + 30 + 10 + 1 + 2 + 6 + 4 = 970.

The name of a tribe to which the famous Shahbāz Khan, Commander of two thousand in Akbar's reign, belonged. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I (trans. Blochmann), pp. 399-402.

A religious order founded by Shaikh Muhiyyu-'d-dīn ‘Abdu-'l-Qādir-i-Jīlī, a Sayyid of the race of Ḥusain. Jīl is a village near Baghdād. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī , text II., 212.

(ẕauq) vide Iṣtilāḥātu-'ṣ-Ṣūfiyyah (Sprenger) sub voce.

(‘ishq-i-majāzī). This Ṣūfi-istic expression requires some explanation. is an adjective formed from the Arabic word which means literally “a thing transferred from one place to another,” and hence “a metaphor,” or “trope.” It was a belief among the Ṣūfīs that the love of a creature for the Creator, a love which they named (‘ishq), might be manifested in that creature's love for other creatures. The word means “sexual love,” and was no doubt originally used by pious Sūfīs to denote the love of a creature for the Creator in consequence of the ecstatic nature of that love. Setting aside the profanity of placing love for God, and a passion (not necessarily love) for a creature on the same, or nearly the same footing, it may easily be conceived that the idea that the latter differed but slightly in merit from the former furnished an excuse for the vilest sensuality, the nature of which need not be touched upon here.

The expression used here (dāru-'l-wiṣāl) is a further reference to the Ṣūfī-istic notion described in note 1. The mention of ‘blame’ and ‘disapprobation’ is sufficient to indicate the nature of Muḥammad Kambū's “love” for the creature.

(shishum az Shavvāl), giving 300 + 300 + 40 + 1 + 7 + 300 + 6 + 1 + 30 = 985. This is a neat chronogram, the words themselves giving the day of the month and the letters of which they are composed the year in which the Shaikh died. A similar chronogram has been composed for the date of Bābar Shāh's birth, viz:— (the sixth of Muḥarram) giving A.H. 888.

The mystics of Islām. Some reference to their extraordinary doctrines has already been made. Their mysticism is “a hypertrophy of the religious feelings,” “a monomania in which man blasphemously attempts to fathom the depths of the essence of God.” (Sprenger. Preface to “Iṣṭilāḥātu-'ṣ-Ṯūfiyyah,” 1845).

Bairām Khan was a Shī‘ah by religion. He was a pious Muslim, and long desired to make the pilgrimage to the Ḥijāz. He had no opportunity of doing so until after Akbar's estrangement from him (Badāonī II (text), p. 38, (translation), p. 32). He was assassinated in Gujarāt on his way to Makkah, in A. H. 968 (A.D. 1560), vide Āīn-i-Akbarī (trans. Blochmann) II, p. 315.

Vide Hughes, “Dictionary of Islām” s. v. ẕikr.

(i‘tikāf-i-arba‘īna). “Sometimes a Khalwatī enters a solitary cell, and remains in it for forty days and nights, fasting from daybreak till sunset the whole of this period.” They “employ their time in repeating the testimony of the faith, imploring forgiveness, praising God, etc.” (Lane's “Modern Egyptians,” ed. 1860, p. 244). This was the nature of the retreats observed by Shaikh ‘Azīzu-'d-Dīn, and that he allowed them to be thus interrupted says much for his practical piety. He continued his period of retreat as though it had not been interrupted.

The translation of this passage is unavoidably ponderous. The original is exceedingly neat, and, translated literally, runs, “He gave place and preference to this transitive worship over intransitive worship.” The terms are borrowed from grammar. The trope is somewhat obscure in English.

Lit. “The next day:” but from the use of the word (mukarrar) “frequently,” it is clear that the Shaikh did not confine himself to a second day's attendance only.

The text inserts here the words (bi-darbār-i-ū) “to his levée,” which occur in neither MS., and are clearly an interpolation. They convey a wrong impression, for the context shews us that the Shaikh sat at the door of the oppressor. If he had gone to his levée he would at least have had an opportunity of speaking to him, which we are told he had not, until the oppressor, hearing of the Shaikh's continued attendance, felt compunction.

This passage, and the fact mentioned in it, that the maniac's rude practical joke was attributed to religions ecstasy, give us some insight into the nature of the religious exercises of the Ṣūfīs.

The word here used is (basharah) the primary meaning of which is “the external skin,” “the cuticle, or epidermis.” It also means (vide Lane “Arabic Lexicon,” sub voce) “the complexion.” The meaning of the passage is clear. The Shaikh did not even change colour.

. This passage may also be translated “In exoteric knowledge he was a perfect man made perfect,” if we mark the last syllable of with . I prefer to mark it with , and translate it as above, for the mention of the Shaikh's teaching, immediately following this sentence, seems to me to indicate that is to be taken as an active and not as a passive participle. No diacritical point is given, either in the text or in the MSS.

There are five well-known works having the word (‘arā'is) as part of their title. The work here mentioned is without any doubt the ‘Arā'isu-'l-Bayān (“Brides of explanation”) by Shaikh Abū Muḥammad Rūzbihān Ibn Abī-'l-naṣri-'l-Baqilī of Shīrāz, the Ṣūfī (died A.H. 606 = A.D. 1209-10). This book is a commentary on the Qur'ān, from the point of view of the Ṣūfīs. (Hājī Khalfā IV. 195).

The work here referred to is the ‘Awārifu-'l-Ma‘ārif—“bounty (in diffusing) the knowledge of God”——, a book on the mysticism of the Ṣūfīs, written by Shaikh Shihābu-'d-dīn Abū Ḥafṣ ‘Umar Ibn Muḥammad Ibn ‘Abdi-'llāhi Sahravardī, who died in A.H. 632 (A.D. 1234-35). (Ḥājī Khalifā IV. 275).

The Fuṣūṣu-'l-Ḥikam, (articulations of the sciences), is a work by Muḥiyyu-'d-dīn Abū ‘Abdi-'llāh Muḥammad Ibn ‘Alī, known as Ibn ‘Arabīyi-'ṭ-Ṭā'ī-l-Ḥātimī-'l-Andalūsi (died A.H. 638 = A.D. 1240-41). The book is divided into twenty-seven “articulations” or “joints,” each containing the wise sayings of some prophet or sage, commencing with Adam, and going on to Shīth (Seth), Nūḥ (Noah), Idrīs (Enoch), Ibrāhīm (Abraham), Isḥāq (Isaac) and others. The (reputed) sayings of our Saviour appear in the sixteenth “articulation.” (Ḥājī Khalfā IV. 425 et seqq.).

I cannot find any mention of these treatises elsewhere, but it is clear that they were polemical works on the theology, or rather mysticism, of the Ṣūfīs.

I.e., the essential unity of all things. The doctrine of the Ṣūfīs on this point is practically pantheism. “All things being of God, it follows that there is nothing that is not a portion of God,”—is their argument. Some have followed this argument to its logical conclusion by declaring that they themselves are God.

In this place the text inserts the particle (ū) “and.” The word is found in neither of the MSS. and destroys the sense.

The expression here used is (arbāb-i-shuhūd) or “lords of (i.e., they who have experienced) ocular perception of God.” This is a Ṣūfī-istic term the meaning of which is sufficiently well represented by the translation. Vide Iṣṭilāhātū-'ṣ-Ṣūfiyyah sub voce .

A.H. 967 (A.D. 1559-60) vide Badāoni II (text), pp. 35 et seqq.

(taṣawwuf) the mysticism of the Ṣūfīs.

100 + 9 + 2 + 9 + 200 + 10 + 100 + 400 + 50 + 40 + 1 + 50 + 4 = 975.

Not quite exactly. give 700 + 200 + 5 + 50 + 1 + 3 + 10 + 7 = 976 vide Badāonī II. text, pp. 105-106.

Shaikh Salīm-i-Cishtī was highly honoured by Akbar. When the emperor desired a son he had recourse, by the advice of his courtiers, to Shaikh Salīm, who assured him that his prayers would be answered. Akbar promised to place the son, when he should be born, under the tutorship of Shaikh Salīm, and the Shaikh stipulated that he should be named after him. This was agreed to. When Jodh Bāī, the Jodhpūr princess who was married to Akbar, became pregnant, she was sent, when the time of her confinement drew near, to Shaikh Salīm's house, where she was delivered of a son, who in accordance with the Shaikh's stipulation was named Sulṭān Salīm, and who afterwards succeeded to the throne as the Emperor Jahāngīr. In gratitude for the gift of a son Akbar performed a pilgrimage on foot to the tomb of Khāja Mu‘īnu-'d-Dīn Cishtī in Ajmīr, distant rather more than 200 miles from Āgra. He travelled twelve kurūh or kos a day, reaching Ajmīr on the 17th day after leaving Āgra, (he must have rested several days on the way). Jahāngīr says that he never heard his father, drunk or sober, call him either Muḥammad Salīm or Sulṭān Salīm, but that he always called him Shaikhū Bābā (in honour of the Shaikh). Shaikh Salīm lived at Sīkrī, a village twelve kurūh distant from Āgra. The birth of Jahāngīr at Sīkrī under these circumstances caused Akbar to believe that the place was a particularly fortunate one for him, and led to the founding of the town of Fatḥpūr Sīkrī, afterwards the favourite residence of Akbar (Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. I. passim, Tūzuk-i-Jahāngīrī, ‘Alīgaṛh edition, p. 1 and preface, pp. 2-5; also Badaoni, text II. 108, 109). Jahāngīr gives the distance from Āgra to Ajmīr as 140 kurūh.

One of the most famous and popular of Indian saints, possessing cenotaph shrines in various places in Hindustan and the Dakhan. His father, Kamālu-'d-Dīn Sulaimān, was a descendant of Farrukh Shāh, ruler of Kābul. He was born in A.H. 584 (A.D. 1188) “in the Qaṣbah (pargana town) of Khotwāl,” near Multān whither his father had come from Kābul, and where he had married. By the advice of his spiritual guide (Khāja Quṭbu-'d-Dīn Bakhtyār-i-Kākī), he went through the ordinary course of studies, “for a devotee without learning is the Devil's jester.” He studied for five years in Qandahār, and then went to Dihlī to see Quṭbu-'d-Dīn. There he remained as his disciple until his fame was so much noised abroad that he was pestered by the numbers of people who came to see him, when he retired to Hānsī. On Quṭbu-'d-Dīn's death Farīdu-'d-Dīn came to Dihlī to succeed him, again retiring to Hānsī at the earnest request of the people of that place and in search of peace. Being still annoyed by visitors at Hānsī he made Shaikh Jamālu-'d-Dīn of that place his deputy there, and set out in search of some secluded spot, at last selecting as his residence Ajūdhan, since called Pattan of Shaikh Farīd, or Pāk Pattan. There he lived and married and had a family. His principal troubles there were due to the jealousy of the local Qāẓī. For the various stories accounting for his name of Shakarganj or Ganj-i-Shakar (treasure house of sweets), vide Farishta, Bombay text. Vol. II, in the account of his life, also Āīn-i-Akbarī (trans. Jarrett) III. 363, 364 note. Farishta gives the date of his death as A.H. 760 (A.D. 1358), a manifest error, as his age is given as 95, which would make the year of his death A.H. 679 (A.D. 1280).

Al Fuẓail Ibnu ‘Iyāẓi-'t-Tālakānī. A famous ascetic, born at either Abīward or Samarqand. He was called At-Tālakānī from the town of Tālakān in Khurāsān. He began life as a highway robber but was miraculously converted to God. He died at Makkah in the month of Muḥarram A.H. 187 (Jan. A.D. 803). Vide Ibn Khallikān (trans. de Slane) II. 478-480. Fuẓail's name is given in the text as Faẓl, though both MSS. have Fuẓail.

(ḥaramaini-'sh-sharīfain), i.e., Makkah and Madīnah.

(ṭawāf) circumambulation. Although the word is used here in connection with both Makkah and Madīnah, the only circumambulation enjoined (Qur'ān xxii. 27) is that of the Ka‘bah at Makkah, which is performed seven times. The ceremony is, however, commonly performed by Indian Muslims, at any rate, at any holy place, such as the grave of a Shaikh.

Najaf, or Mashhad ‘Alī, (the shrine of ‘Alī) a town in ‘Iraq-i-‘Arab, on the Baḥr-i-Najaf (Lake of Najaf) and near the ruins of Kūfa. Here ‘Alī, the nephew and son-in-law of Muḥammad, is buried.

giving 4 + 600 + 30 + 50 + 1 + 1 + 30 + 8 + 200 + 40 = 964.

The method of the Ṣūfīs. They are “the elect,” those to whom God more especially reveals Himself, drawing them to Himself with mysterious bonds, and inflaming their hearts with an ardent love for Him. Vide my note on their doctrines, supra.

The name of this Shaikh is not given either in MS. (A) or in MS. (B). The general sense of the passage indicates that the name has been omitted, probably by a copyist's error. As the passage stands it is impossible to identify the Shaikh.

. “The original name of Bengal was Bang.” Āīn-i-Akbarī text. I. 388.

Or Pattan, where is the tomb of Shaikh Farīdu-'d-din Shakarganj, vide supra, p. 19 n. 1.

For the two chronograms here referred to, vide Badāonī II, (text) p. 73. I feel bound to remark here, in order to save readers who cannot avail themselves of the original text some perplexity, that the passage just referred to has been completely mistranslated by Mr. Lowe. His translation makes Shaikh Salīm write an Arabic letter to Badāonī, whereas it was Badāonī that wrote this Arabic letter to Shaikh Salīm. These remarks are, I regret to say, absolutely necessary, as the passage in vol. II, referred to contains a refer-rence to the Arabic letter here translated, a reference which must necessarily be unintelligible to readers who are bound to rely on the translation, and who cannot be expected to study closely the long list of errata at the end of the volume.

In both MSS. and in the text the second hemistichs of these two couplets are transposed, i.e., the second hemistich of the first couplet appears as the second hemistich of the second couplet and vice versâ. Both the sense and the grammar shew that this transposition has been made. I have restored the hemistichs to their proper places. The translation of this letter will appear very stilted, but, the substance being worthless, I have judged it best to make the translation as literal as possible, for the letter itself has no place in this history except as an example of the author's Arabic style, with which he, at any rate, seems to have been well pleased.

The text has . MS. (A) has which makes better sense and which is the reading adopted by me.

, i.e., in the vessels (or receptacles) of letters of the alphabet. The simile is clear.

This text from the Qur'ān (xxxi. 26) is not quite fully quoted. The text runs:—

“Even though all the trees on the earth should become pens, and the sea (ink) with seven more seas to swell its tide, the words of God would not be spent; verily God is mighty, wise!”

The misapplication of it is apparent. Badāonī substitutes for “the words of God” the affection which he bears to the Shaikh. This savours somewhat of irreverence, and reminds us of the way in which Scripture was quoted in the days of Praise-God Barebone.

This Hemistich appears, both in the text, and in the two MSS. in the following form:—

The hemistich, thus written, will neither scan nor make sense. The text has a footnote:—“Sic in all three copies; a word has evidently been omitted here.”

Mr. R. F. Azoo, Arabic Instructor to the Board of Examiners, informs me that these lines are a quotation, though he cannot remember from where, and that the correct reading of this hemistich is:—

I have therefore adopted this reading, and have translated accordingly.

The text has , a misprint for .

The text and MSS. have which does not make sense. We, should read (akrām) is a word not known in Arabic, but in Indian Arabic it is used as the plural of (karam), and, as Badāonī's letter is distinctly Indian Arabic, it is permissible to adopt this reading.

The text rightly reads instead of the of the MSS. “He after whom there comes no one” is Muḥammad, “the last of the prophets” or the “seal of the prophets.” Muḥammad said of himself “There is no prophet after me.”

lit., “the resort of apostleship.” The word used here is a compound adjective formed from this expression, and is impossible of translation. I have translated the word (Ṣūrat) “form,” by the word “position,” for that word best conveys the true meaning of the passage. Vide next note.

The two Shaikhs are Abū Bakr and ‘Umar, who are buried, in graves adjoining Muḥammad's, within the precincts of the Masjidu-'n-Nabawī, or “the prophet's mosque” at Madīnah. The three tombs are, or are supposed to be within the ḥujrah (chamber), so called because it was the room of ‘Āyishah, Muḥammad's favourite wife. The ḥujrah is “separated on all sides from the walls of the mosque by a passage about 26 ft. broad on the south side, and 20 on the eastern. The reason of this isolation has been before explained, and there is a saying of Muḥammad's, “O Allah! cause not my tomb to become an object of idolatrous adoration! May Allah's wrath fall heavy upon the people who make the tombs of their prophets places of prayer!” Inside there are, or are supposed to be, three tombs facing the south, surrounded by stone walls without any aperture, or, as others say, by strong planking. Whatever this material may be, it is hung outside with a curtain, somewhat like a large “four-post bed.” (Vide Burton's “Pilgrimage to El-Medīnah and Meccah, ed. 1855, II. c. xvi).” The question put by Shaikh Salīm to Badāonī was put, no doubt with a view to testing the visitor's knowledge of controversial works. There are few more fruitful subjects of controversy among Muslims than the relative positions of the tombs of Muḥammad, Abū Bakr and ‘Umar. This is necessarily so, as the question is utterly indeterminable, unless the ḥujrah should be violated, an act of which no Muslim would be capable. The utility of the controversy is not apparent. From what Muḥammad himself is reported to have said (vide suprā) it was clearly his wish that his tomb should be ignored. Such a wish is little likely to be respected by Indian Muslims, who are only too ready to perform the ceremony of ṭawāf, which should be restricted to the Ka‘bah, at the shrine of any petty saint. Vide Burton's strictures on the conduct of Indian pilgrims at Makkah and Madīnah, passim.

This work is not mentioned by Ḥājī Khalīfah. It was possibly a controversial work on the unedifying subject mentioned in the last note.

The text has with a footnote variant, . MS. (A) has and MS. (B). , which last is the reading that I have adopted.

“miracles.” There are, pace Badāonī, no “highlands” () in Fatḥpur Sīkrī, and it is not surprising that a man who had travelled for years in colder countries than India, undergoing the hardships which were, in those days, inseparable from travel, (), should have felt the cold, even in the cold weather, at Fatḥpur Sīkrī, very much less than stay-at-home Indians did.

(Khāṣṣah), fine cotton cloth of a close texture. Its price in the reign of Akbar was from three rupees to fifteen muhrs per piece ( ‘adad). Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī text. I. 108.

. Price Rs. 4 (otherwise, from Rs. 4 to five muhrs) per piece (ibid.).

Special fasts observed by devotees, vide note on , suprā. The only fast incumbent on all Muslims is the fast of Ramaẓān, lasting for one lunar month.

, giving 300 + 10 + 600 + 5 + 50 + 4 + 10 = 979.

Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī (text) I. 438, where the name is spelt (Abethī).

means an intense longing after God, the result of special attraction exercised by God over the subject of the sensation. Here the rule of life of a Ṣūfī (or rather the absence of any such rule) is instructively contrasted with the rule binding on an orthodox Muslim. The Ṣūfī considers himself above all ceremonial rules, and may observe them or not, as he likes. If he does observe them, it is more for the benefit of the weaker brethren, the followers of the “holy law,” than for any advantage that might accrue to himself from such observance. He is “one with God,” “converted,” “saved,” and nothing he does or leaves undone can possibly affect him.

, the branches of knowledge by means of which one gains a livelihood.

, “remembrance” and “recital.” A form of religious exercise adopted by darvishes. It may be a physical as well as a mental exercise, being the recital of God's praises, attributes, etc., either with the tongue of the flesh, () or with the “tongue of the heart” (); a detailed account of the various forms of the exercise will be found in Hughes' “Dictionary of Islām” (ed. 1885) pp. 703 et seqq.

The word “moon” is generally used in Persian poetry as a synonym for “the beloved one,” the object of the lover's devotion. Here, in Ṣūfī-istic style, it is used for God, as the Beloved of the mystic.

The chief town of a sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Awadh (Oudh). It is near the present military cantonment at Sītāpūr. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī text, I. 437. Also Hunter's Gazetteer, VIII. 128. It will be observed that Shaikh Niẓāmu-'d-dīn used to circumambulate Shaikh Sa‘d's tomb, a ceremony which should be confined to the Ka'bah at Makkah. This circumambulation of the tombs of saints has probably been borrowed, like some other customs, by Indian Muslims from the Hindus.

Vide infrā, No. XIV.

Vide infrā, Chapter II, No. XLVII.

Vide Chapter II, No. XXXII.

The text has for , in spite of the clear reading of both MSS. But the reading of the text seems, nevertheless, to be correct.

, “Articulations of the Sciences.” Vide note on this work, supra.

The “Iḥyā'u-‘ulūmi-'d-dīn” by the Shāfi‘ī Imām, Ḥujjatu-'l-Islām Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad Ibn Muḥammad Ghazālī, who died at Ṭūs, A.H. 505 (A.D. 1111-12). Of this book it has been said “If all books on Islām were lost, and the Iḥyā only remained, the loss of the others would not be felt.” It is divided into four parts: (1) on ritual, and matters of faith, (2) on manners and morals, (3) on the lusts of the world, the flesh, and the Devil, and (4) on the virtues of a religious life. (Ḥājī Khalīfah I. 180-182).

Ar-risālatu-'l-Makkiyyah, by Shaikh Imām Quṭbu-'d-dīn ‘Abdu-'llāh Ibn Muḥammad Ibn Aimani-'l-Aṣfahīdī. Ḥājī Khalīfah III. 445.

Ādābu-'l-Murīdīn, by Shaikh Abū-'n-Najīb ‘Abdu-'l-Qāhir Ibn ‘Abdi-'l-lāhi-'s-Sahrawardī, (d. A.H. 563 = A.D. 1167-68). Ḥājī Khalīfah I. 214.

The oration or sermon delivered in the masjid every Friday.

. (Kāfīyat-fī-'n-Naḥwi) a work on Arabic Grammar, by Shaikh Jamālu-'d-dīn, commonly known as Ibnu-'l-Ḥājib, (d. A.H. 646 = A.D. 1248). An edition of it was published by Capt. John Baillie, (Calcutta, 1805). Shaikh Niẓāmu-'d-dīn objected to the use of it by his pupil on the score of its having no (‘unwān), here called (khuṭbah), setting forth the praises of God. The pupil's argument was that he must learn Arabic grammar before he could read Arabic works on divinity, and that Grammar was therefore, in a sense, the foundation of a sound knowledge of divinity. The Kāfiyah commences, without the usual ‘unwān or preface, thus:—

Ibnu-'l-Ḥājib has been defended against the charge of impiety on the plea of his humility, which led him to believe that his book was not worthy of an ‘unwān. Niẓāmu-'d-dīn was evidently too much of a precisian to admit this plea.

Vide infra, p. 39, where the Shaikh gives his reason for neglecting this duty.

The word used here is (ghibṭa). Its usual meaning is “ungrudging emulation.” Badāonī, however, habitually uses it in the sense of “envy.” Vide Vol. I (Dr. Ranking's translation), p. 395 and p. 543, n. 4.

. The word is inserted in the text, though it appears in neither MS. It appears, however, necessary to the sense, and the textual reading is therefore probably the correct one.

. Both wife's brother and wife's father. Shaikh Niẓāmu-'d-dīn must therefore have married an aunt and a niece. This is allowable by Muḥammadan law, provided that the two are not at the same time wives of one husband. The Shaikh probably married the aunt first, and, after her death, the niece.

The text has here giving which is the reading of MSS. (A) and (B) as a footnote variant. The reading in the text has probably been adopted because is a much commoner phrase than . The sense is not affected. is a substantive but must be translated as though it were an adjective.

The name ‘Muḥammad’ is prefixed to Ḥusain in both MSS. The Amīr referred to is generally known as Ḥusain Khān simply, and is thus called in the subsequent passages of this narrative. He was Badāonī's first patron, vide note 4, on p. 6. He held Lakhnau in jāgīr for about a year only, during which time Badāonī was in his service. Kānt u Gola was subsequently given to him in jāgīr. For the account of Ḥusain Khān, here mentioned, vide Badāonī, vol. II passim.

I can find no notice either of Sayyid Aṣghar or of Qāẓī Aḥmad, though an account of the latter's brother, Qāẓī Mubārak, is given subsequently in this volume (c. II, No. XLVII). In the text the words are very carelessly omitted, so as to make it appear that Qāẓī Mubārak himself, and not his brother, introduced Ḥusain Khān to the Shaikh. These words are nevertheless clearly written in each MS.

The author's mention of himself in the third person, as is usual, is often apt to be confusing. It might appear from the structure of this long passage that it was Ḥusain Khān that ‘observed,’ but the subsequent context shews that Badāonī is referring to himself in the words . The whole of this passage is very involved, and I have been obliged to break it up into periods and transpose portions of it, in order to render its meaning into passable English.

The text has, wrongly, for .

, the recorded sayings of Muḥammad, which form the ground-work of Muḥammadan tradition and are venerated equally with the Qur'ān.

(haẓrat-i-jāmi‘ah) lit. “the presence which had collected us together.” Presumably Ḥusain Khān is meant.

(az jānibī) lit. ‘from a certain direction.’

Scil. Sayyid Aṣghar of Badāon.

(dar-yāft), perhaps “singled out,” or “button-holed.”

(Ash-shaitāni-'r-rajīm) lit. “the Devil, the stoned one.”

The text has a misprint here, for .

Qur'ān XXVIII, 88. The Kashshāf explains that “face” means the whole Person of God. This is the figure of speech called in Persian .

. “Completely effaced.”

Something was evidently weighing heavily on Badāonī's conscience. He has not told us what it was. His disgraceful “love” affair did not take place until four years after this time. (Vol. II text, pp. 136-37).

The text of the Qur'ān runs, in the original . The translation has just been given. The student's question meant “Can we not refer the possessive pronoun (“his” or “its”) attached to the word to some person or thing other than God?” It is but fair to remark that the question appears absurd, but still the Shaikh need not have substituted abuse for argument. Perhaps the sting of the student's question lay in his reference to the “masters of the secret knowledge of God,” () which seems to convey a hint that the Shaikh and his companions could not be classed in that category. The reference below to the student's “design” seems to bear out this view.

“the epidermis, or cuticle.” Vide suprā, p. 16, n. 3.

Vide suprā, p. 4, n. 1.

In the text the article has been carelessly omitted before the word in the first hemistich of this couplet, though it appears in both MSS. and is the correct reading.

commonly called in Persian , and in Arabic . The first of the five obligatory periods of prayer. These prayers should be recited between dawn and sunrise.

This seems to have been Badāonī's younger brother.

Qur'ān VIII, 62.

The Arabic is very badly pointed in the text.

A pargana town in the sarkār of Lakhnan, Ṣūba Awadh (Oudh). Most likely one of Ḥusain Khān's jāgīr villages, whither he had returned after the interview mentioned above.

The text has here , which means “parrot.” Both MSS. read , which means “the young of man or of any animal,” and is a far more appropriate term than . I have, of course, followed the MSS.

That is, Qāẓī Aḥmad of Gopāmau, Sayyid Aṣghar, and Badāonī himself, or perhaps Ḥusain Khān is included, in which case one of the other two must be left out.

. This seems to mean rather, “had pulled off his clothes,” the thief leaving his clothes in the hands of the police and so escaping, but as Badāonī says immediately afterwards that the thief escaped (in some way or other) I have translated the phrase by “seized him by his clothes,” in order to preserve the ambiguity regarding the thief's means of escape.

. The words are carelessly omitted from the text, though they occur in both MSS.

The text has the word (“this”) here, though it occurs in neither MS. I have omitted it in the translation.

The year was H. 976 (A.D. 1568). It must be borne in mind that the Muslims, like the Jews, reckon their day from sunset. Thus “the last day of Ramaẓān, at night,” would be, according to our reckoning “the night of the last day but one of Ramaẓān” or, in this case, as they travelled through the night “the early morning of the last day of Ramaẓān.” The necessity for this explanation will be apparent hereafter, where it is stated that Ḥusain Khān returned to Lakhnau to keep the ‘īd there.

vide suprā p. 34, n. 1.

The kos of Hindustān. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. II. (trans. Jarrett), p. 414 and n. 2.

. These prayers were hardly, in this instance, public. They were rather “common to two or more.” Their merit lay in the “gathering of two or three together,” as S. Chrysostom, quoting the Holy Scriptures, says.

. This is the repetition, at the commencement of the ritual prayers, of the mu'aẕẕin's call to prayer, which commences with the ( “God is great”) repeated three times.

. Reference has already been made to the doctrines of the Ṣūfīs.

The word (“some,”) which appears in the text, is in neither MS. I have, nevertheless, retained it, for the context clearly shews that the Shaikh read more than one couplet.

The prince of Persian poets, the “interpreter of secrets,” and “the tongue of that which is hidden.” He is too well-known to stand in need of any description here. He is known even in England, where, as a rule, no one is known who has not been, as “sweet bully Bottom” was, translated. Hāfiẓ has not been translated into English, but the English equivalents of the Persian words used by him have been given by Colonel Wilberforce Clarke, R. E.

Khāja Bahā'u-'d-Dīn Naqshband. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, text, II, 212. Riẓā Qulī, according to Col. Wilberforce Clarke, states, that the pīr who instructed Hāfiẓ was Maulānā Shamsu-'d-Dīn-i-Shīrazī.

Abū Ḥanīfah, the founder of one of the four orthodox sects or theological schools of Islām.

I cannot find this couplet in any edition of Hāfiẓ to which I have access. I know of no one English word which will translate the word , so I have used “pemmican” as the word which most conveniently translates it.

The person meant is Bāyazīd-i-Anṣārī, the apostle of the Afghāns, who is styled Pīr-i-Raushan, and founded the Ṣūfī sect called Raushaniyyah, or “the enlightened.” He established amid the mountains of Afghānistān a temporal power upon the authority of his spiritual character, and his successors disturbed the tranquillity of the Dihlī empire during the reign of Akbar. Vide Beale's “Oriental Biographical Dictionary.”

Shaikh Junaid-i-Baghdādī, a famous ascetic, born at Baghdād, where he died in A.H. 298 (A.D. 911). (Beale O.B.D.)

Shaikh Abū Bakri-'sh-Shiblī a celebrated doctor of divinity, born and brought up at Baghdād, where he died A.H. 334 (A.D. 946). Shaikh Junaid, mentioned in the last note, was one of his spiritual masters. (Beale O.B.D.).

Manṣūr-i-Ḥallāj, the surname of Shaikh Ḥusain-i-Ḥallāj, a celebrated Ṣūfī and ascetic. Musalmāns differed in their opinion of his character. By some he was believed to be a saint and a worker of miracles, by others a juggler and impostor, deceiving the people with his tricks. He was in the habit of proclaiming “Ana-'l-Ḥaqq,” “I am the Truth,” or “I am God”— the logical conclusion of his Ṣūfī doctrines. For this blasphemy he was put to death with great torture by the Khalīfah Muqtadir in A.H. 306 (A.D. 919) or, according to Ibn-u-Khallikān in A.H. 309 (A.D. 922.) He is considered by the Ṣūfīs to be one of their most spiritual leaders, and to have attained the fourth, or last stage of Ṣūfī-ism. An inspired Ṣūfī is said to have demanded of the Almighty why he permitted Manṣūr to suffer. The reply was, “This is the punishment for the revealer of secrets,” i.e., his offence was not blasphemy, but indiscretion in uttering a great truth to ears unfit to hear it. (Beale O.B.D.). It seems that the Shaikh was vexed with Badāonī for inquiring into matters which were beyond him (Badāonī) but it may be that the Shaikh was not ready with an answer and took advantage of Badāonī's known servility to “saints” to escape, by this means, the necessity of owning himself to be at a loss.

I.e., the new moon had been sighted and the ‘īdu-'l fiṭr had begun.

. The use of this word is due to modesty, as the author by its use avoids introducing his own name.

.

Vide suprā, p. 17, n. 2.

The Shaikh was evidently ashamed of himself, but, rather than confess himself in the wrong, adroitly managed to persuade Badāonī, by a line of reasoning that would be deemed irreverent by any Muslim who was not a slavish admirer, that he had received a blessing rather than an insult.

Vide suprā, p. 30, n. 1 The text inserts between the words and the conjunction , which is in neither MS. and destroys the sense.

. This sentence is somewhat obscure, as may be taken to mean either “condition,” simply, or “ecstasy.” Nor is it clear whether Badāonī means that the mournful and harsh “music” combined with the Shaikh's discourse made him a changed man, or that the “music” broke the spell under which the Shaikh's discourse had laid him.

Abū Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uṯmān, and ‘Alī.

I have not been able to find another quotation of this saying. The text and both MSS. have the word , which means (in this context) “ability to receive colour.” The sense is not apparent, as a stone can receive colour as well as can any other object. But if we read , with a difference of one letter only, the meaning will be that which I have given in my translation, which is in every way more appropriate.

and . The first is the true leprosy, in which the fingers and other extremities gradually rot away, and the face assumes the “leonine” appearance. The second is leucoderma, or white leprosy, which itself affects only the colouring matter of the skin, but is commonly said (Muḥīṭu-'l-Muḥīṭ suḅ voce ) to end in true leprosy. It is this disease with which Gehazi was smitten—“Et egressus est ab eo leprosus quasi nix.”
2 Kings v. 27.

There are many “sayings” of Muḥammad on the virtues of salt. Some specify salt as a cure for some of the diseases for protection from which Badāonī had just been directed to pray.

in both MSS. The text has , with as a footnote variant. I have, of course, adopted the reading of the MSS.

the reading of both MSS. The text has , which destroys the sense.

. This consists in fasting during the six days following the ‘īdu-'l-fiṭr, i.e., from the 2nd to the 7th of Shawwāl, inclusive. Abū Ayūb relates that Muḥammad said “The person who fasts the month of Ramaẓān and follows it up with six days of the month of Shawwāl, will obtain the rewards of a continued fast” (Hughes, Dict. of Islām, sub voce “Fasting.”)

Riẓwān is the keeper of the garden of Paradise.

The text omits the Shaikh's territorial designation in the head-line, following MS. (B). I follow MS. (A) and insert it.

Kākōrī, given in the text, for some reason or for no reason as (Kākarī). Both MSS. have Kākōrī. Vide also Āīn-i-Akbarī (text) I.

This is the reading of the text, and is undoubtedly the correct reading. The word imām is somewhat indistinct in both MSS. Perhaps the copyists considered Badāonī's comparison irreverent, and compounded with their consciences by writing the word as indistinctly as possible.

This reference is to a poem named Ḥirzu-'l-amānī wa wajhu-'t-tahānī, the subject of which is the seven methods of reading the Qur'ān. The author was Abū-'l-Muḥammadi-'l-Qāsimi-'sh-Shāṭibī, from whom the poem is known as Ash-shāṭibiyyah. The author died in H. 590 (A.D. 1194). Shāṭib is said by Ibn Khallikan to be a town in Eastern Spain. I cannot identify it. Vide Ḥājī Khalfā III. 43, and Ibn Khallikān; s. v. Ash-shāṭibī.

Īrij was the chief town of a sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Āgra. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, text, Vol. I., p. 448.

. This means really the confession of the unity of everything with God and of God with everything, the expression of belief in the pantheism of the Ṣūfīs. The meaning of this somewhat enigmatical “saying” is that such a statement made in public cannot possibly edify the uninitiated, and is confined in its results to the speaker and the initiated present. The text wrongly following MS. (B) has “men of the world,” for (MS. A) “men of knowledge.”

Badāonī's first patron, vide suprā, p. 6, n. 4.

Vide suprā in the life of Shaikh Bhīkan, the last mentioned holy man.

In MS. (A) the life which here follows is headed with the name of Shaikh Muḥammad Qalandar of Lakhnau, biography No. XIII being given as the life of this saint. I follow the text and MS. (B) in the arrangement of the names, but follow the two MSS. in the designation of Sayyid Tāju-'d-dīn—“of Lakh-nau”—which is omitted in the text.

No. III.

Vide note on the heading of biography No. XII.

The third and last sovereign of the Lodī dynasty, grandson of Buhlūl Lodī, the first of the line. Sulṭān Ibrahīm was conquered and slain by Bābar on the field of Panipat in A.D. 1525.

MS. (A) has here—correctly as it seems to me. The text and MS. (B) omit it.

A cumbrous translation of , but one which explains its meaning fully.

The text and MS. (B) have “Shaikh Niẓām” only, but MS. (A), which I follow, gives the Shaikh's full name.

The chief town of a sarkār in the Ṣūba of Āgra (vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. II. trans. Jarrett, pp. 97, 182, 193.

Vide suprā, passim.

vide Iṣṭilāḥātu-'ṣ-Ṣūfiyyah (Sprenger) s. v.

(raughan-i-māl-kaṅgnī). Māl-kaṅgnī is the Hindī name of celastrus or staff-tree. The oil is extracted from “the aromatic bitter seed” of this tree, and is “held in much repute for diseases of the stomach and bowels.” Vide Fallon, s. v.

. This is not one of the properties attributed to the drug by Fallon. It is pretty evident, from what Badāonī says, that the drug, whatever it may have been, was an intoxicant, used by Niẓāmu-'ddīn's orders for the purpose of inducing a trance, or mock state of religious ecstasy. The ordering of the use of the drug on the particular occasions mentioned points to a debased superstition which has but little connection with pure Muḥammadanism.

The text inserts here, although the word appears in neither MS. and is pleonastic. I follow the readings of the MSS.

MS. (A) has here , which is wrongly substituted for . I have followed the reading of the text and MS. (B) which is correct.

MS. (B) has (wrongly) for . Ūsh is in Transoxiana and was the birthplace of the Khāja, who died on the 14th Rabī‘u-'l-Awwal A.H. 634 (A.D. 1236). He was offered by Sulṭān Shamsu-'d-dīn Iyaltamish the post of Shaikhu-'l-Islām, which he declined. The Khāja's full name and titles were Khāja Qutbu-'d-dīn Muḥammad Bakhtyār-i-Ūshī-yi-Kākī. Vide Farishta, Bo. text, II. 717-725 and Āīn-i-Akbarī II. trans. Jarrett, 303 and note 2.

. The term usually applied to the festival of a Musalmān saint in India. The word means “nuptials,” and is used to signify the saint's union with God, the festival usually commemorating his death.

. 1 + 5 + 50 + 900 + 1 + 40 = 997.

The chief town of a sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Awadh (Oudh). The unusual name of this saint recurs in the Pādishāhnāma, as the name of one of Shāh Jahān's officers.

MS. (A) has wrongly, for here. I follow the text, which is supported by MS. (B).

Lit. “are his heirs.”

The text has while both MSS. have , which is correct.

The text has here which is a very unsatisfactory reading. The MSS. give , which is undoubtedly correct.

.

pl. of . Literally “males.” The force of the expression will be understood when the Oriental view of masculine superiority is remembered.

Sister's son to Sulṭān Maḥmūd of Ghaznī. He was slain by Hindūs at Bahrāic, in Awadh (Oudh) on his wedding-day, which thus became, in a double sense, his (vide suprā). The point of the question, put to a presumably orthodox Musalmān, will be appreciated only by those who are acquainted with the latitudinarian cult of this “saint.” Want of space compels me to forego an account of this cult, but those who are interested in the popular religion of Indian peoples and in the peculiar developments of Muḥammadanism in India will do well to study “Heroes Five” by Mr. R. Greeven of the Indian Civil Service. Curiously enough this Northern Indian cult finds its counterpart in the Dakhan in the cult of ‘Abdu-'r-Raḥmān, a close relation of Sālār Mas‘ūd, which however is not nearly so popular as is the cult of the latter.

The very curtness of this reply shews the Shaikh's unwillingness to countenance in any way the debased cult of Sālār Mas‘ūd.

Scil. Akbar.

. Either a subsistence allowance in money, or, more probably, lands held on aima tenure.

MS. (A) and the text have . MS. (B) has . The description of this town given in the text enables us to identify it with Chat. Chat and Ambāla (not to be confounded with the well-known military cantonment, which was in the Sirhind Sarkār of the Ṣūba of Dihlī), together formed a maḥall in the Sarkār of the Bārī Dūāb in the Ṣūba of Lāhōr. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī Vol. II. (trans. Jarrett), p. 318.

. A vague term including both Turkish Arabia and Arabia Proper.

A pargana town in the district “Bīrūn-i-Panjnad,” (beyond the five rivers,) opposite the Sind Sāgar Dūāb Sarkār of the Ṣūba of Multān. A.A. II. (Jarrett), 331.

.

.

lit. “an orphan pearl,” i.e., a pearl which has no peer. The double meaning of the word cannot be reproduced in English.

The slaughtered sons of ‘Alī and Fāṭimah, and grandsons of Muḥammad.

The text has , but both MSS. have , which is evidently the correct reading. I follow the MSS.

The text here has with the though the word is thus written in neither MS. The mistake does not alter the sense, but it destroys the structural uniformity of the sentence.

This phrase is here used in its literal sense. The Persian has .

This must be Ṣadkhara or Ṣadkara, as it is written in the Āīn-i-Akbarī, (both text and translation) in the Bārī Dūāb Sarkār of the Ṣūba of Multān.

The well-known town in the Sarkār Bīrūn-i-Panjnad (beyond the five rivers) in the Ṣüba of Multān. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī, Vol. II. (trans. Jarrett), p. 331, Raverty “The Mihrān of Sind,” J. A. S. B., Pt. I., 1892 passim.

“El-Sharḥ El-Mokammel, commentarius absolutus de genealogiâ Hasani neglecta, auctore Imam Hāfitz Abu Musa Mohammed Ben Omar Medini Isfahāni, [anno 581 (inc. 4 Apr. 1185) mortuo]. In hoc com-pendio, quod ita incipit: Laus Deo, qui ex cultoribus suis eos quos vult praeter ceteros distinxit, etc., auctoritatem Hasani Ben Moslim in traditione ‘Moslim de potionibus’ describit.” Haji Khalfa. iv. 41.

.

MS. (B) has . The text rightly follows MS. (A) with .

MS. (B) has . The text rightly follows (A) with .

The text, following MS. (A) has . There is no such word. MS (B) has which is correct.

One of the traditionary sayings of Muḥammad, in which he refers to himself.

A couplet from Hāfiẓ, Ode 241 (Colonel Jarrett's edition). The text and MS. (A) have for , MS. (B) has is correct.

. Qur'an XXXVIII. 25.

. The pleonasm is unavoidable.

Or Dīpālpūr. The chief town of a Sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Multān, now the headquarters of the Dīpālpūr Taḥṣīl in the Montgomery District, Panjāb. Vide Hunter's “Imperial Gazetteer” iv. 303. Āīn-i-Akbarī (trans. Jarrett), Vol. II. 331 et passim, and Raverty's “Mīhrān of Sind,” J. A. S. B., Pt. I., 1892 passim.

MS. (A) has, wrongly, for .

Another instance of the use by Indian Muslims of the practice of circumambulation, which should be restricted to the Ka‘bah, at the tombs of saints.

Vide suprā, p. 19, n. 1.

The title of this book, written in honour of Shaikh Dā'ūd, evidently bears reference to the psalms of David.

. 20 + 4 + 1 + 10 + 300 + 10 + 600 + 4 + 1 + 6 + 4 = 960.

. 1 + 2 + 6 + 1 + 30 + 40 + 70 + 1 + 30 + 10 + 8 + 100 + 2 + 200 + 60 + 400 = 961. The totals of the two chronograms differ by one. This latter chronogram is given in Abū-'l-Ma'ālī's life, on p. 103 of the text of this volume as the date of his birth, and therefore presumably gives the correct date.

.

An instance of the belief among Muslims leading the religious life that something which seems, according to their ideas, to correspond to the Sacrament of Orders in the Christian Church, is necessary to enable a man to start as a religious instructor of the people.

His life is given on p. 91 (text) of this volume. (Chapter II, No. XVI.)

The word is omitted in MS. (B) probably by an oversight of the copyist.

Prayers offered up for the|welfare of any person. Vide “Qānūn-i-Islām,” Ja'far Sharīf and Herklots, s. v. “Fateeha neeut khyr kee.”

Vide suprā, p. 48, n. 6.

The word is omitted in MS. (B). As vowel points are not used the reading of MS. (B) is to the same purport as that of the text and MS. (A), but would be literally translated, “May his tomb be sanctified.”

MS. (B). The text and MS. (A) have . Vide suprā, p. 47, n. 6.

This order must not be confounded with an older order bearing the same title, instituted in A.H. 561 (A.D. 1165-6) by Sayyid ‘Abdu-'l-Qādīri-'l-Jīlānī, surnamed Pīr-i-Dastgīr, whose shrine is at Bāghdād. The older order is the most popular religious order among the Sunnīs of Asia. Hughes' Dict. of Islām, s. v.

These orders have been already referred to. Following the names of these two orders the text wrongly has . The conjunction must be omitted to make sense.

Both MSS. insert here, which makes nonsense, and is rightly omitted in the text.

Both MSS. have , but the textual emendation is correct.

Vide Badāonī, Vol. I. (trans. Ranking), pp. 513-525. The “men of God” referred to seem to have been the Mahdawīs.

MS. (A). The text has the corrupted form .

omitted in MS. (B). The text rightly follows MS. (A).

The text has , erroneously. Both MSS. read .

. MS. (A) has . The text rightly follows MS. (B).

Makhdūmu-'l-Mulk accused Shaikh Dā'ūd of permitting his disciples to address their ẕikr (vide Hughes' “Dict. of Islam,” s. v.), directly to him (Dā'ūd) instead of to God. Dā'ūd rebuts the accusation by asserting that the words actually used, which might conceivably have been mistaken for “O, Dā'ūd!” were “O, Wadūd!” i.e., “O, God!” means “loving.” “the loving King” is one of the titles of God.

. The editor of the text appears to be doubtful as to the meaning of the words , for he finds it necessary to explain in an apologetic footnote that this is the reading of each of the three MSS. to which he had access. It seems to me that the author means to say that Dā'ūd spent about twelve hours with Makhdūmu-'l-Mulk, and that he (the author) cannot say whether the conference began in the morning or in the evening.

.

Vide suprā, p. 3, n. 4.

MS. (A) has . The text, rightly following MS. (B), reads .

MS. (B) omits .

The text reads . Both MSS. read . MS. (B) adds after . This may or may not be an interpolation. It signifies only that the occasions were fixed by the Shaikh himself.

“he relinquished to rapine.” Both MSS. read, for . I prefer the reading of the text.

, “he ordered a raid (to be made).”

. MS. (B) omits .

, omitted in MS. (A).

. MS. (B) has which does not make sense.

Both MSS. read , and there is a footnote in the text giving this as the reading of the MSS. It is, however, wrong. The reading of the text () is probably correct, though it is not very good Arabic.

Badāonī's abhorrence of the infidelity of Abū-'l-Faẓl and Akbar's later advisers causes him to forget his abhorrence of the Shī‘ah tenets of Bairām Khān.

. MS. (B) has , which is nonsense.

text. MS. (A) has , which reading I prefer, as it seems to me that would accompany more fitly than , I have nevertheless translated the phrase by “outstrip” rather than by “excel.” The meaning does not suffer. The reading of MS. (B) is not distinct.

The verb is omitted in both MSS. and rightly inserted in the text.

The text has . Both MSS. read , which is correct.

wrongly omitted in MS. (A).

Vide Badāonī, Vol. II. (text), p. 153. These events happened in the year H. 981 (A.D. 1573-4). Kānt u Gūla (Shāhjahānpūr) was Muḥammad Ḥusain Khān's jāgīr.

MS. (B) has .

(text). Both MSS. have . The sense is not affected.

. The literal translation of this (“a light sparkled from his auspicious incisors”) reads so very grotesquely in English that I have softened the expression of Badāonī's almost idolatrous veneration for the Shaikh. In plain English the phrase means no more than that the holy man shewed his teeth when he smiled.

Badāonī's enthusiasm probably leads him into some exaggeration here. Taking the number “fifty or a hundred” to be about seventy-five, and supposing that these conversions were made on two hundred days in each year—a very mild rendering of the author's statement—we should have a result of 15,000 converts per annum.

The text rightly follows MS. (B) with . MS. (A) has , which is incorrect.

MS. (B) incorrectly omits the word .

Lit. “the folk of the house of purity,” a circumlocution in strict accordance with Muslim etiquette.

The text reads . Both MSS. have , which I prefer.

. MS. (B) has , a mis-spelling due to the employment, in speaking, of the .

. Qur'ān XIII. 28.

This was evidently a descendant of Sulṭān ‘Alā'u-d-Dīn ibn-i-Muḥammad Shāh ibn-i-Mubārak Shāh ibn-i-Khiẓr Khān, the last Emperor of the Sayyid dynasty. Vide Badāonī, Vol. I. (trans. Ranking), pp. 400-402. This dynasty was not exterminated as was the usual custom when an usurpation of the throne took place, but the last Emperor was, in accordance with his own request, permitted by Buhlūl Lōdī, the usurper, to retire to Badāon. It seems that Badāonī himself, disgusted with the fashionable infidelity, favoured the claims of this pretended Mahdī.

omitted in MS. (B).

. MS. (B) has , which is nonsense.

Vide suprā for the biography of Ghauṯ-i-A‘ẓam. MS. (B) has the Arabic form Ghauthu-'l-A‘ḍham.

The text here has the particle , which is in neither MS. Its interpolation is unidiomatic.

. Possibly “a married man with a family,” but I prefer the translation which I have given, on account of what follows. The assertion that the religious Sayyid was a married man would make the statement that he was acquainted with the art of war a non sequitur. The assertion that he is of imperial descent gives a reason for his knowledge of that art.

The text here inserts . These words are in neither MS. and I have omitted them.

lit. “commit highway robbery on that helpless one.” De mortuis nil nisi bonum.

. The paradox contained in the expression cannot well be expressed in English.

. (B) has , evidently a copyist's error. The context clearly shews that this expression is used here for one who is religious solely for the purpose of attaining to the sensual joys promised to good Muslims in the next world.

The text has . Both MSS. have the conjunction , which the sense requires.

I.e., he who loves God for His own sake, irrespective of any hope of reward. Cf. S. Francis Xavier's hymn, “O Deus, ego amo te!”

. Both MSS. have . The reading of the text appears to me to be preferable.

The text omits , though both MSS. have it.

. (B) has , which makes nonsense.

I understand this phrase to mean the Mīrzās who were, with their relative Ulugh Mīrzā (not Ulugh Baig Mīrzā, who was a younger brother of ‘Umar Shaikh Mīrzā and uncle of Bābar) in rebellion.

His biography is given on p. 48 (text) of this volume, but no reference is made to the title . In the reading I follow MS. (A). The text and MS. (B) have . The Āīn-i-Akbarī (Calcutta text I. 233) reads .

The chief town of the Sarkār of the same name in the Ṣūba of Dilhī. Now the headquarters of the District of the same name in the N.-W. P.

This expression seems to have puzzled the editor of the text, for he appends a footnote stating that it occurs in all the three MSS. to which he had access. The Qādirī shirt was probably a shirt of a distinctive pattern or cut, worn by the Qādirīyyah order of ascetics, founded by Shaikh Dā'ūd.

. Both MSS. have, wrongly, .

Scil. when his army was defeated at Ṭalamba. Vide Badāonī, text, vol. II., pp. 157, 158.

A prayer for the attainment of an object, the recitation of the or first chapter of the Qur'ān being part of the exercise.

It is quite possible that the soldier may have been instructed by Shaikh Dā'ūd to deliver the shirt to Badāonī, without mentioning that he was merely a messenger.

Lit. “Joseph's shirt.” The reference is obvious.

, literally “the pole-star,” “the pivot on which everything turns, or the point of attraction.” “Cynosure,” as used by Milton, fairly represents the sense in English.

The text has . MS. (B) has , and MS. (A) has , which has been altered to is without doubt the true reading.

The text follows MS. (A) with . (B) has .

—Text and MS. (A). MS. (B) has , which is wrong.

Vide suprā, p. 53, n. 2. The text has the corrupted form , also the MSS.

Scil. the Emperor Akbar, who went to Gujarāt in A.H. 981 (A.D. 1573-4).

Shahbāz Khān-i-Kambū. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī I. (trans. Blochmann's) 399. Shahbāz Khān was probably selected for the mission as being, himself, of a holy family.

A saying of Muḥammad. It is related that a beggar came to Muḥammad complaining that he was poor. Muḥammad replied “Poverty is my glory.” Shortly afterwards a second beggar approached with the same complaint. Muḥammad replied, “Poverty is disgrace both in this world and the next.” On being asked by his companions how these two apparently contradictory sayings could be reconciled, he said, “Did ye not see that the first man had forsaken the world, while the second had been forsaken by the world?”

, the point towards which all face in prayer. “Cynosure” does not literally translate either or (vide suprā) but it is the nearest word we have in English to these words in the sense in which they occur in the text.

. 10 + 1 + 300 + 10 + 600 + 4 + 1 + 6 + 4 + 6 + 30 + 10 = 982.

For another account of Badāonī's visit to this saint vide Badāonī, vol. II. (text), pp. 156, 157. Ḥusain Khān, Badāonī's patron, also visited him about the same time, vide Badāonī II., 156.

A footnote in the text gives “Sayyid” as a variant, but both MSS. have “Shaikh.”

A pargana town in the sarkār of Sambhal, Ṣūba Dilhi. Vide Āīn-i-Akbarī , vol. II. (trans. Jarrett), 289.

That is to say that the Shaikh, though a Ṣūfī, observed the ceremonial and ritual law. This is mentioned as something uncommon, for Ṣūfīs believe that their supposed close union with God absolves them from the obligation of such observances.

Vide suprā, in the account of Shaikh Dā'ūd's life (No. XVI).

Scil. Shaikh Aban. His being here styled “the Sayyid” may account for the variant referred to in note 5 on the preceding page.

, may be translated either as above, or by “not by appointment,” which would mean that the discourse was not one of a regular series or delivered at a time when the Shaikh was in the habit of delivering an address. The text and MS. (B) have , MS. (A) has , which is better.

. MS. (B) has , evidently a copyist's error.

These words, occur twice in the Qur'ān, once in Sūrah XVIII. 44.

“But good works, which are lasting, are better in the sight of thy Lord as to recompense, and better as to hope.”

And in Sūrah XIX. 79.

“And good works, which are lasting, are better in the sight of thy Lord as to recompense, and better in the issue (than all worldly possessions).”

It was probably the second of these two texts that the Shaikh quoted, for the former is but a portion of a verse, while the latter is a complete verse. There is, however, no real difference between the meanings of the two passages. There is a difference of one word only in the Arabic and this difference in no way alters the sense in either case.

. MS. (A) has .

The particle is wrongly omitted from the text, which follows MS. (B). The reading of MS. (A) is correct.