Moreover, amongst the several tribes of Kshatriyas, who, having
neglected to observe the holy customs, and to visit the Bráhmans,
became so degenerate that they were expelled their caste, and regarded
as “Dasyus,” or robber tribes, Manu enumerates the “Pah-
These indications need not be enlarged on further in this place.
Many will, of course, look upon them as fanciful and extravagant.
Others, who feel so disposed, must pursue the investigation for
themselves; for it is foreign to the main design of this Note, which
has merely been to show that we have the Meds of the Arabs retaining
their own name to this day, as well as probably under a slightly
varied form, in and around the original seats of their occupation.
That object has, it is hoped, been accomplished satisfactorily, and
with regard to all extraneous matter, to use the words of Cicero,
sequimur probabilia, nec ultrà quam id, quod verisimile occurrerit, pro-
[General Cuuningham, in his Report for 1863-64, says:—“The
Meds or Mands are almost certainly the representatives of the Man-
[“The earliest notice of the Meds is by Virgil, who calls the
Jhelam Medus Hydaspes. The epithet is explained by the statement
of Vibius Sequester, which makes the Hydaspes flow “past the city
of Media.” Now this is clearly the same place as Ptolemy's Euthy-
[As the date of the Peutingerian Table is not later than A.D. 250, we have a break of upwards of four centuries before we reach the earliest notices of the Muhammadan writers. In these we find the Meds or Mands firmly established in Sindh, along with their ancient rivals the Játs, both of whom are said to be the descendants of Ham, the son of Noah. Rashíd-ud dín further states that they were in Sindh at the time of the Mahá-bhárata, but this is amply refuted by the native histories of the province, which omit both names from the list of aborigines of Sindh. Ibn Haukal describes the Mands of his time (about A.D. 977), as occupying the banks of the Indus from Multan to the sea, and to the desert between Makrán and Famhal. Masudi, who visited India in A.D. 915-16, calls them Mind, and states that they were a race of Sindh, who were at constant war with the people of Mansura. These notices are sufficient to show, that at some time previous to the first appearance of the Muhammadans, the Meds must have been forced to migrate from the Upper Panjáb to Sindh. There they have since remained, as there can be no doubt that they are now represented by the Mers of the Árávalí Range to the east of the Indus, of Káthiáwar to the south, and of Biluchistán to the west.”
[“The name of Mer, or Mand, is still found in many parts of
the Punjáb, as in Meror of the Bari and Rechna Doabs, in Mera,
Mandra, and Mandanpur of the Sind Ságar Doab, and in Mandali, of
Multan. Mera, which is ten miles to the west of Kalar Kahár, is
certainly as old as the beginning of the Christian era, as it possesses
an Arian Pali inscription, fixed in the side of a square well. The
Mers would seem also to have occupied Lahore, as Abú Ríhán states
that the capital of Loháwar was named Medhukur or Mandhukur.*
This place is said to have been on the east bank of the Ravi, and, if
so, it was most probably Lahore itself, under a new name. There
is an old place called Mandhyawála, on the west bank of the Ravi,
and only twelve miles to the south-west of Lahore, which may
possibly be the Mandhukur of Abu Ríhán. But the old mound of
Mirathira, in the Gugera district, in which figures of Buddha and
moulded bricks have been discovered by the railway cuttings, is a
more likely place. This frequent occurrence of the name in so
many parts of the Panjáb, and always attached to old places, as in
Mera, Mandra, and Meriali, of the Sindh Ságar Doab, and in Med-
[* * * * “About this time (30 to 20 B.C.) the Meds may be supposed to have retired towards the south, until they finally established themselves in Upper Sindh, and gave their name to their new capital of Minnagara. As this could scarcely have been effected with the consent of the former occupants of Upper Sindh, whom I suppose to have been the Iatii, or Jats, I would refer to this period as the beginning of that continued rivalry, which the historian Rashídu-d dín attributes to the Jats and Meds.* To this same cause I would also refer the statement of the Erythræan Periplus, that about A.D. 100, the rulers of Minnagara were rival Parthians, who were mutually expelling each other.”]