Vincent thinks that the Minnagara of Ptolemy, and of the Periplus
usually ascribed to Arrian, is the Manjábarí of the Arab geographers.
D'Anville supposes Minnagara to be the same as Mansúra. C. Ritter
says it is Tatta, so does Alex. Burnes, because Tatta is now called
Sa-Minagur, and Mannert says, Binagara should be read for Minna-
The Periplus merely says, “Minnagara is inland.” <greek>. Again, the Periplus says, the “Metropolis of the whole country, is Minnagara, whence great quantities of cotton goods are carried down to Barygaza,” or Broach, which could scarcely have been the place of export, if Minnagara had been on the Indus. But even allowing it to have been on the Indus, there is every reason to suppose it was on the eastern bank, whereas Manjábarí is plainly stated to be on the western.
Lassen derives the name of this capital of Indo-Scythia from the Sanskrit Nagara, a town, and Min, which he shows from Isidorus Characenus to be the name of a Scythian city. The Sindomana of Arrian may, therefore, owe its origin to this source. C. Ritter says Min is a name of the Sacas; if so, there can be little doubt that we have their representatives in the wild Minas of Rájputána, who have been driven but little to the eastward of their former haunts.
Minnagara is, according to Ptolemy, in Long. 115. 15. Lat. 19. 30, and he places it on the Nerbadda, so that his Minnagara, as well as that of the second quotation from the Periplus, may possibly be the famous Mándúgarh (not far from the river), and the Mánkír which the early Arab Geographers represent as the capital of the Balhará. [See the article “Balhará.”]
The fact appears to be that there were two Minnagaras—one on,
or near, the Indus; another on the Nerbadda (Narmada). Ptolemy's
assertion cannot be gainsaid, and establishes the existence of the
latter on the Nerbadda, [and this must have been the Minnagara of
which the Periplus represents Broach to be the port]. The one on,
or near, the Indus was the capital of Indo-Scythia, and the Bina-